Maxillary Augmentation Rhinoplasty 

  • Author: Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS; Chief Editor: John R Taylor, MD, FRCSC, FACS   more...
 
Updated: Apr 6, 2010
 

Background

Maxillary augmentation denotes the genre of reconstructive surgeries that address the correction of maxillary hypoplasia. Maxillary hypoplasia results from the underdevelopment of the maxillary bones and produces midfacial retrusion, creating the illusion of protuberance of the lower jaw. As a result the profile appears prognathic.

Next

History of the Procedure

Cinelli provided one of the earliest descriptions of correcting maxillary hypoplasia in 1958.[1] Correction of the premaxillary segment of a patient with an acute columella-labial angle and an overly long nose was undertaken by rotating a caudal septal cartilage flap onto the maxilla.

Previous
Next

Problem

Maxillary hypoplasia can affect different subunits of the maxillary bone. If the entire maxilla is hypoplastic, it is termed maxillary micrognathia, while premaxillary hypoplasia refers to the part of the maxillary bone between the lateral maxillary incisor fissures. Many authors refer to this area when speaking of maxillary hypoplasia in relation to rhinoplasty. The anterior spine of the maxilla can be hypoplastic, requiring augmentation with a maxillary spine graft. Hypoplasia in the area of the alar-facial junction may also occur, while Byrd and Hobar defined perialar hypoplasia as a deficiency of the nasal base skeleton.[2] This deficiency results in ptosis and a diminished projection of the nasal tip. With an acute columella-labial angle, an edentulous appearance can be appreciated along with deepening of facial folds and posterior displacement of the alar base in relation to the cheek. Hinderer described para-alar implants for the correction of deep alar and nasolabial grooves.[3]

Medial maxillary hypoplasia, also known as nasomaxillary hypoplasia, can create a "dishpan face" appearance.[2] Hinderer described this as maxillary body hypoplasia resulting in a depression of the paranasal mid face.

Hypoplasia of the maxillary bone in the medial inferior orbital region can result in a tear-trough deformity, occasionally observed with malar (zygoma) hypoplasia. At times, various authors interchange premaxillary with maxillary and perialar hypoplasia when referring to the same hypoplastic area.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Often, maxillary hypoplasia is observed in various ethnic groups, but it may not be appreciated as a cause of facial deformity if subtle.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Congenital, acquired, or developmental maxillary hypoplasia can occur.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Craniofacial anomalies, Apert syndrome, and Crouzon syndrome include maxillary and cranial hypoplasia.

More localized anomalies, such as Binder syndrome, refer to congenital maxillary hypoplasia. In Binder syndrome, also referred to as maxillonasal dysplasia, anterior nasal spine, nasal bone, and anterior maxillary hypoplasia are found. These patients have a concave mid face with a C-shaped profile, a blunted, short nose, and an acute columella-labial angle.[4]

Cleft palate and labial deformities are often coupled with premaxillary hypoplasia,[5] resulting in an acute columella-labial angle, ptosis of the nasal tip, and upper labial retraction, with possible exposure of the upper gingiva.

Etiologies of acquired hypoplasia are often from trauma or from malposition of the maxillary bone following surgery. Converse et al have postulated that during childhood, trauma can have a retarding effect on facial development.[6]

Developmental hypoplasia may be a sequela to dental extraction, with failure of the maxillary bone to properly mature and expand.

Previous
Next

Presentation

Patients of Northern European ancestry, including English descendants, can have maxillary hypoplasia.[7]

Premaxillary hypoplasia is often observed in patients of Hispanic, African American, and Asian (mesorrhine) heritage. Platyrrhine (African American) noses can also appear flared with widened alae, insufficient dorsal nasal support, and underprojection of the nasal tip.[8]

Previous
Next

Indications

Aesthetic considerations

The middle third of the face is the area delineated by a horizontal line connecting the lateral canthi to a horizontal line tangentially placed at the upper edge of Cupid's bow of the lip.[9] More common descriptions denote the middle third of the face to encompass from the glabella to the subnasale[9] or from the brow to the base of the nose.[10]

Ideally, the face is divided into thirds from the hairline to the lower border of the chin and into fifths from outer ear to outer ear. Dividing the face into vertical thirds and horizontal fifths connotes symmetry. However, not all faces considered beautiful adhere to these aesthetic "rules." Aesthetically appealing facial features vary by sex, race, and the eye of the beholder.

While certain aspects of facial beauty or facial handsomeness transcend culture, ethnicity, and time, other aspects are particular to one or more of these conditions. Facial features that are considered beautiful in today's world can differ not only between Eastern and Western cultures, but from age to age within a given culture.

Maxillary augmentation is indicated when any part of the maxilla is hypoplastic and creates an aesthetic or functional deficiency. Maxillary augmentation in the context discussed herein denotes an adjunctive procedure used during rhinoplasties. If malocclusion exists, surgeries that create osteotomies, such as Le Fort I-type fractures, anterior maxillary displacement, and other orthognathic procedures, can be employed.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Each of the two maxillary bones is pyramidal and consists of 4 legs or processes: the zygomatic process, the frontal process, the alveolar process, and the palatine process. These processes emanate from the body of the maxillary bone. The premaxilla is found between the lateral maxillary incisor fissures anterior to the incisive foramen (see images below). The premaxilla includes the 4 incisor teeth and the nasal spine.

Skeleton of the head. Superiofrontal view showing Skeleton of the head. Superiofrontal view showing maxilla and premaxilla. View of head skeleton from below showing incisive View of head skeleton from below showing incisive foramen, palate, and premaxilla.

Within the body of the maxillary bone is the maxillary sinus. The orbital floor serves as the roof of the maxillary sinus and transmits the infraorbital neurovascular structures via the infraorbital groove and canal. These structures exit at the infraorbital foramen, superior to the canine fossa.

The frontal surface of the maxillary bone forms the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus and contains the infraorbital foramen. The lateral nasal wall forms the medial wall of the maxillary sinus and the alveolar and palatine processes form the floor of the sinus.

The alveolar process houses the teeth, and the palatine process forms most of the hard palate. The zygomatic process of the maxilla joins the zygoma, forming the infraorbital rim and most of the floor of the orbit. Lastly, the frontal process of the maxilla extends superiorly and joins with the nasal bone, the lacrimal bone, and the frontal bone.

The maxillary bone is composed of 4 vertical buttresses. One buttress is the lateral buttress, which is also referred to as the zygomaticomaxillary buttress; the anterior buttress is referred to as the nasomaxillary buttress. The posterior buttress is also referred to as the pterygomaxillary buttress. The final buttress, the median buttress, is also referred to as the frontoethmoidovomerian. The first 3 buttresses are dual or paired whereas the last buttress is single.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

A major contraindication is an allergy to implant materials.

A relative contraindication is presented by patients who have extremely thin skin, making implant camouflage challenging.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS  Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Doctors Hospital of Sarasota

Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Sarasota County Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Adam J Cohen, MD  Eyelid and Facial Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Diseases and Surgery of the Orbit and Lacrimal System, Cosmetic Laser Surgery

Adam J Cohen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, and American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward W Chang, MD, DDS  Consulting Staff, Department of Cosmetic Services, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California at Santa Rosa

Edward W Chang, MD, DDS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, and California Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Edward H Farrior, MD, FACS  Affiliate Associate Professor, Voluntary Faculty, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of South Florida Health Sciences Center; Visiting Clinical Associate Director, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia

Edward H Farrior, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Florida Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Donald R Laub Jr, MD, FACS  Professor, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine; Interim Chief of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Fletcher-Allen Health Care

Donald R Laub Jr, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Hand Surgery, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, AO Foundation, Association for Academic Surgery, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Vermont State Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Frederick J Menick, MD  Chief, Division of Plastic Surgery, St. Joseph's Hospital; Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine; Facial and Nasal Reconstructive Surgeon, Tucson, Arizona

Frederick J Menick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: none None None

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

George Peck, Jr, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, St Barnabas Hospital of New Jersey

George Peck, Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD  Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John R Taylor, MD, FRCSC, FACS  Independent Practice, Ontario

John R Taylor, MD, FRCSC, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Medical Association, and Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Cinelli JA. Correction of combined elongated nose and recessed naso-labial angle. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1958;21(2):139-42. [Medline].

  2. Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Alloplastic nasal and perialar augmentation. Clin Plast Surg. Apr 1996;23(2):315-26. [Medline].

  3. Hinderer UT. Nasal base, maxillary, and infraorbital implants--alloplastic. Clin Plast Surg. Jan 1991;18(1):87-105. [Medline].

  4. Watanabe T, Matsuo K. Augmentation with cartilage grafts around the pyriform aperture to improve the midface and profile in binder's syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. Feb 1996;36(2):206-11. [Medline].

  5. Cook TA, Wang TD, Brownrigg PJ, Quatela VC. Significant premaxillary augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 1990;116(10):1197-201. [Medline].

  6. Converse JM, Horowitz SL, Valauri AJ, Montandon D. The treatment of nasomaxillary hypoplasia. A new pyramidal naso-orbital mazillary osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1970;45(6):527-35. [Medline].

  7. Flowers RS. Augmentation maxilloplasty. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS, eds. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. Mosby: St Louis; 2000:129-150.

  8. Romo T 3rd, Shapiro AL. Aesthetic reconstruction of the platyrrhine nose. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 1992;118(8):837-41. [Medline].

  9. Brink RR. Premaxillary augmentation. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS, eds. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. St Louis: Mosby; 2000:119-127.

  10. Tolleth H. Aesthetics and plastic surgery. In: Terino EO, Flowers RS, eds. The Art of Alloplastic Facial Contouring. Mosby: St Louis; 2000:3-11.

  11. Cochran CS, Ducic Y, DeFatta RJ. Restorative rhinoplasty in the aging patient. Laryngoscope. May 2007;117(5):803-7. [Medline].

  12. Fanous N, Yoskovitch A. Premaxillary augmentation for central maxillary recession: an adjunct to rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Nov 2002;10(4):415-22. [Medline].

  13. Foda HM. Mersiline mesh in premaxillary augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2005;29(3):169-73. [Medline].

  14. Mathog RH, Leonard M, Bevis R. Surgical correction of maxillary hypoplasia. Arch Otolaryngol. Jul 1979;105(7):399-403. [Medline].

  15. Nassif PS, Kokoska MS. Aesthetic Facial Analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin of North Am. November 1999;7(1):4.

Previous
Next
 
Skeleton of the head. Superiofrontal view showing maxilla and premaxilla.
View of head skeleton from below showing incisive foramen, palate, and premaxilla.
Front view of Brink peri-pyriform silicone implant from Implantech.
Side view of Brink peri-pyriform silicone implant from Implantech.
Fanous premaxillary silicone implant from Implantech.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.