eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Nose

Rhinoplasty, Supratip Deformity: Treatment

Author: Gregory A Buford, MD, FACS, Medical Director, Body by Buford
Coauthor(s): Armand R Lucas, MD, Attending Plastic Surgeon, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Dean Fardo, MD, Associate Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 28, 2008

Treatment

Medical Therapy

Proper preoperative surgical planning and identification of those patients at highest risk for the deformity are the hallmarks for prevention of supratip deformity. Though many patients demonstrate mild degrees of supratip prominence following removal of the dorsal splint and dressings, aside from supratip taping, immediate intervention generally is not recommended.

To address supratip prominence, Gruber advises waiting 4-6 weeks after surgery, at which time he injects 1-2 mg of triamcinolone (0.1-0.2 mL of 10 mg/mL triamcinolone) into the supratip with an equal volume of lidocaine.19 The patient is evaluated the following week and the dose repeated as necessary. This regimen then is repeated for several weeks as needed.

Guyuron stresses the importance of preoperative identification of those patients at risk.4 For patients with a history of prior hypertrophic or keloid scarring and those with noticeably sebaceous oily skin, he suggests prophylactic Kenalog injection into the supratip region at the time of surgery, emphasizing the need for deep injection and avoidance of dermal instillation. In patients who develop noticeable supratip fullness within 1-3 months after surgery, he recommends early aggressive taping (1-3 mo postoperatively) of the supratip region for as many hours as the patient tolerates. If this proves unsuccessful, he proceeds with steroid injection (0.1-0.2 mL of triamcinolone 40 mg/mL or 0.2-0.4 mL of 20 mg/mL) into the supratip swelling. If no improvement is noted after 3 injections, he suggests waiting for at least 1 year before attempting surgical intervention.

Although subcutaneous steroid injection may prove effective at resolving or at least minimizing the appearance of the postoperative supratip deformity, it must be used with caution to avoid associated stigmata. Local complications including telangiectasias, thinning of the skin, and poor healing can result from local installation, and the patient should be warned of these potential adverse events before proceeding with therapy.

The newest medical treatment for supratip deformity involves injection of calcium hydroxylapatite into the deep dermis or dermal-subcutaneous junction above the affected area. The injected substance can then effectively be molded to shape and used to build up and diminish the lower prominence by creating a continuous nasal dorsal profile. Treatment can be performed using topical numbing cream and takes as little as 15 minutes. The result can then be expected to last 8-12 months or longer.

Surgical Therapy

Timing of surgical intervention to address the supratip deformity is equally as important as the overall approach. Although early revision may be tempting, it also may prove disastrous. Nonoperative measures should be exercised and exhausted before surgical plans are made, and these plans should not be pursued before 12 months following the initial surgery. Prior to surgical revision, the nose should be analyzed through a systematic approach focusing on all aspects of its architecture. If possible, obtain old operative records or notes in the planning of this procedure.

The deformity first is defined through a detailed history and complete aesthetic facial and nasal analysis. Next, its etiology is identified. Are displaced anatomic structures present? Have structural components been underresected (incomplete surgery) or overresected (overzealous surgery), or has a combination thereof occurred? From here, surgical goals are established. Finally, a treatment plan is formulated. Displaced anatomic structures must be repositioned appropriately. Areas of underresection should be identified and the proper amount and location determined. Likewise, in areas of overresection, missing tissue should be identified and replaced as needed. Finally, the optimal method of approach (closed vs open) is determined based on the overall findings and the deformity itself.20

In addressing the deformity, Sheen suggested making a proper diagnosis of the abnormality, limiting dissection, using only autogenous graft material, and designing a well-defined preoperative concept of the aesthetic goal. Although he acknowledged that the deformity can reflect local underresection or overresection, in his experience, most were the end result of overzealous resection and inadequate tip support. For these, he advocated autologous augmentation of the dorsal septum and proper tip grafting.

For those patients in whom underresection was the culprit, Rees et al suggest trimming the high dorsum, excising scar tissue, and lowering the upper lateral cartilages, as necessary.15 Although he recognized the effectiveness of increasing tip projection through columellar advancement and alar cartilage modification, he advised against the use of alloplastic materials or autogenous grafts to achieve this end, warning of the risk of extrusion or resorption. He also argued against overresection of the upper lateral cartilages, the end result of which can be "...unsightly grooves on either side of the midline of the nasal dorsum below the nasal lines..." that he said are "...almost impossible to correct...."15

In an analysis of the deformity, Guyuron suggested that "...the simplest type of secondary supratip deformity is an overprojected caudal dorsum...."4 He believed this can be corrected by resection of excessive cartilage. In patients with thick skin, he advocated placing a supratip stitch to optimize coaptation of the dorsal skin envelope over the modified cartilaginous framework, adding that the goal should be to create a 6- to 8-mm differential between the tip and supratip apices to achieve aesthetically pleasing supratip definition.

For the underprojected tip, he recommended tip grafts if the lobule is small or columellar struts if the lobule is of adequate size. For the underprojected mid vault, he proposed the use of septal, costochondral, or conchal cartilage grafts. For the cephalically oriented lower lateral cartilages, he suggested simply repositioning them to address supratip prominence. Finally, he supported Sheen's conclusion that most supratip deformities are the result of overzealous resection and that the deformity is the end product of scar tissue formed in response to overresection and creation of dead space.4

Review of the comprehensive literature describing both the supratip deformity and its correction suggests an approach tailored not only to diagnosing the problem but also, of equal importance, to identifying its etiology. In the end, the best method for preventing the secondary supratip is to avoid it altogether. This can be accomplished only through a systemic preoperative analysis of the nasal architecture and a focused surgical plan.

Preoperative Details

In the case of a supratip deformity caused by a previous attempt at a rhinoplasty, a detailed discussion must be carried out with the patient. One feature that is worth emphasizing is that in a secondary or tertiary procedure, the resolution of edema may be slower than in the primary procedure.

Postoperative Details

While a close follow-up is important in all rhinoplasty patients, it is of particular import in patients who have undergone previous attempts at correction of the deformity. Because of their past experience, they may be significantly more anxious or demanding than "routine" rhinoplasty (ie, patients undergoing their first procedure).

More on Rhinoplasty, Supratip Deformity

Overview: Rhinoplasty, Supratip Deformity
Workup: Rhinoplasty, Supratip Deformity
Treatment: Rhinoplasty, Supratip Deformity
References
[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

References

  1. Converse JM. Corrective rhinoplasty. In: Converse JM, ed. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1977:1152.

  2. Sheen JH. A new look at supratip deformity. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1979;3(6):498-504. [Medline].

  3. Sheen JH. Secondary rhinoplasty. In: Sheen JH, ed. Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1978:464.

  4. Guyuron B, DeLuca L, Lash R. Supratip deformity: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2000;105(3):1140-51; discussion 1152-3. [Medline].

  5. Labrakis G. The universal nose of early childhood: nature's aid in understanding the supratip deformity and its correction. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 1992;29(1):55-7. [Medline].

  6. Daniel RK. Secondary rhinoplasty following open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1995;96(7):1539-46. [Medline].

  7. Byrd HS. The supratip break. Presented at: The Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium. Dallas, TX: 1996.

  8. Klabunde EH, Falces E. Incidence of complications in cosmetic rhinoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1964;34:192-6. [Medline].

  9. McKinney P, Cook JQ. A critical evaluation of 200 rhinoplasties. Ann Plast Surg. Nov 1981;7(5):357-61. [Medline].

  10. Swanepoel PF, Eisenberg I. Current concepts in cosmetic rhinoplasty. S Afr Med J. Oct 3 1981;60(14):536-44. [Medline].

  11. Stucker FJ, Bryarly RC, Shockley WW. The failed rhinoplasty. In: Gates GA, ed. Current Therapy in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: BC Decker; 1984:129.

  12. Stucker FJ. 120 cases of revision rhinoplasty. In: Sisson GA, ed. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Face and Neck: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1975:29.

  13. O'Connor GB, McGregor MW. Secondary rhinoplasties: their cause and prevention. Plast reconstr surg (1946). May 1955;15(5):404-10. [Medline].

  14. Kamer FM, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty. Analysis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 1988;114(3):257-66. [Medline].

  15. Rees TD, Krupp S, Wood-Smith D. Secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1970;46(4):332-40. [Medline].

  16. Johnson C, Toriumi DM. Open Structure Rhinoplasty. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1990.

  17. Anderson JR. Symposium: the supra-tip in rhinoplasty: a dilemma. III. Supra-tip soft-tissue rounding after rhinoplasty: causes, prevention and treatment. Laryngoscope. Jan 1976;86(1):53-7. [Medline].

  18. Deneke HJ, Meyer R. Corrective and Reconstructive Rhinoplasty. NY: Springer-Verlag; 1967:451.

  19. Gruber RP. Primary open rhinoplasty. In: Gruber RP, Peck GC, eds. Rhinoplasty, State of the Art. St Louis: Mosby; 1993:85.

  20. Gunter J. External approach for secondary rhinoplasty. Dallas, TX: Presented at: Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium; 1999:291-304.

  21. Aufricht G. Rhinoplasty and the face. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1969;43(3):219-30. [Medline].

  22. Burgess LP, Everton DM, Quilligan JJ, et al. Complications of the external (combination) rhinoplasty approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 1986;112(10):1064-8. [Medline].

  23. Cohen S. Complications following rhinoplasty. Plast reconstr surg (1946). Sep 1956;18(3):213-26. [Medline].

  24. Constantian MB. Distant effects of dorsal and tip grafting in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1992;90(3):405-18; discussion 419-20. [Medline].

  25. Farrior EH. Dramatic refinement of the nasal tip. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Aug 1999;32(4):621-36. [Medline].

  26. Funcik T, Hochman M. The effect of intradermal corticosteroids on skin flap edema. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 1995;121(6):654-7. [Medline].

  27. Goldman IB. Rhinoplasty; its surgical complications and how to avoid them. J Int Coll Surg. Mar 1950;13(3):285-99. [Medline].

  28. Holt GR, Garner ET, McLarey D. Postoperative sequelae and complications of rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Nov 1987;20(4):853-76. [Medline].

  29. Maliniac JW. Prevention and treatment of late sequelae in corrective rhinoplasty. Am J Surg. 1940;50:84.

  30. McKinney P, Cunningham BL. Concepts. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1989:31.

  31. Millard DR. Secondary corrective rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1969;44(6):545-57. [Medline].

  32. Pardina AJ, Vaca JF. Evaluation of the different methods used in the treatment of rhinoplastic sequelae. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1983;7(4):237-9. [Medline].

  33. Parkes ML, Kanodia R, Machida BK. Revision rhinoplasty. An analysis of aesthetic deformities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 1992;118(7):695-701. [Medline].

  34. Pastorek N. Surgery of the nasal tip. Presented at: the Dallas Rhinoplasty Symposium. Dallas, Tex: 1999.

  35. Pitanguy I. Surgical importance of a dermocartilaginous ligament in bulbous noses. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1965;36:247-53. [Medline].

  36. Rogers BO. Rhinoplasty. In: Goldwyn RM, ed. The Unfavorable Result in Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little Brown; 1972.

  37. Safian J. A new anatomical concept of postoperative complications in esthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1973;51(2):162-3. [Medline].

  38. Safian J. Fact and fallacy in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1953;12:24.

  39. Sheen JH. Rhinoplasty: personal evolution and milestones. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 2000;105(5):1820-52; discussion 1853. [Medline].

  40. Smith TW. As clay in the potter's hand. A review of 221 rhinoplasties. Ohio State Med J. Aug 1967;63(8):1055-7. [Medline].

  41. Steiss CF. Errors in rhinoplasty and their prevention. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. Sep 1961;28:276-8. [Medline].

  42. Stucker FJ, Bryarly RC, Shockley WW. Complications in nasal surgery. In: Ward PH, Berman WE, eds. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Head and Neck: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1984:156.

  43. Tebbetts JB. Shaping and positioning the nasal tip without structural disruption: a new, systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1994;94(1):61-77. [Medline].

  44. Thomas JR, Tardy ME. Complications of rhinoplasty. In: Johns ME, ed. Complications of Head and Neck Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: BC Decker; 1986:269.

  45. Webster RC. Revisional rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Oct 1975;8(3):753-82. [Medline].

  46. Wright WK. Study on hump removal in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope. Apr 1967;77(4):508-17. [Medline].

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Further Reading

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Keywords

rhinoplasty, revision rhinoplasty, rhinoplasty revision, supratip deformity, supratip rhinoplasty, polly beak deformity, parrot beak deformity, supratip prominence, supratip protrusion, rhinoplasty surgery, rhinoplasty plastic surgery, nose surgery, nasal surgery

[ CLOSE WINDOW ]

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Gregory A Buford, MD, FACS, Medical Director, Body by Buford
Gregory A Buford, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Medical Student Association/Foundation, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Dermik Aesthetics Honoraria Speaker/National Trainer; Allergan Honoraria Speaker/National Trainer; Medicis Honoraria Speaker/National Trainer; Sound Surgical Technologies Honoraria Speaker/National Trainer; Kinetic Concepts International Honoraria Speaker/National Trainer

Coauthor(s)

Armand R Lucas, MD, Attending Plastic Surgeon, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Armand R Lucas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Dean Fardo, MD, Associate Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Dean Fardo, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Frederick J Menick, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine; Private Practice in Tucson, Arizona
Frederick J Menick, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: none None None

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

George Peck, Jr, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Plastic Surgery, St Barnabas Hospital of New Jersey
George Peck, Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Deepak Narayan, MD, FRCS, Associate Professor of Surgery (Plastic), Yale University School of Medicine; Chief of Plastic Surgery, West Haven Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Deepak Narayan, MD, FRCS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Indian Medical Association, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, and Royal College of Surgeons of England
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.