eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Rhytidectomy
Facelift, Subperiosteal: Follow-up
Updated: Oct 3, 2006
Outcome and Prognosis
Endoscopic facial surgery has been performed at this practice for approximately a decade, and no patient has yet required re-elevation of his or her mid face or forehead. The operation produces reliable and reproducible results that can improve transverse forehead creases, glabella frown lines, brow position, position of the lateral canthus, and the corners of the mouth. It can improve the tear trough and projection of the cheek. It is the technique of choice for patients younger than 45 years and when implants are to be placed.
Future and Controversies
Although the subperiosteal facelift has been used for many years, it was the advent of endoscopic surgery that has made this technique more popular. Initially, the technique was plagued by reports of persistent facial edema. This problem has been overcome with increasing speed of dissection and decreasing soft tissue trauma. The authors believe the subperiosteal plane allows better optical cavity than subgaleal or subcutaneous dissection. The bone is bright and almost bloodless, allowing for light reflection rather than light absorption.
The bony landmarks and attachments of muscles useful for orientation are clearly seen. These landmarks are not always available in the subgaleal or intermediate plane techniques. The subperiosteal plane allows the forehead and mid face to be dissected in the same plane. This plane does not contain branches of the facial nerve. The vascularity of the face is not compromised. This may be a consideration in patients who smoke. It is the only technique that allows repositioning of the soft tissues with relation to their bony attachments. These advantages combined with the longevity of the procedure make it the procedure of choice for facial rejuvenation.
More on Facelift, Subperiosteal |
| Overview: Facelift, Subperiosteal |
| Treatment: Facelift, Subperiosteal |
Follow-up: Facelift, Subperiosteal |
| Multimedia: Facelift, Subperiosteal |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Besins T. The "R.A.R.E." technique (reverse and repositioning effect): the renaissance of the aging face and neck. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2004;28(3):127-42. [Medline].
De La Plaza R, Valiente E, Arroyo JM. Supraperiosteal lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face. Br J Plast Surg. Jul 1991;44(5):325-32. [Medline].
Ramirez OM. Full face rejuvenation in three dimensions: a "face-lifting" for the new millennium. Aesthetic Plast Surg. May-Jun 2001;25(3):152-64. [Medline].
Ramirez OM, Robertson KM. Update in endoscopic forehead rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. Feb 2002;10(1):37-51. [Medline].
Ramirez OM. Subperiosteal endoscopic techniques in facial rejuvenation. In: Guyuron B, ed. Plastic Surgery Indications, Operations and Outcomes. Vol 5. St. Louis:. Mosby;2000.
Ramirez OM. Mandibular matrix implant system: a method to restore skeletal support to the lower face. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2000;106(1):176-89. [Medline].
Tessier P. [Subperiosteal face-lift]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34(3):193-7. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
subperiosteal facelift, rhytidectomy, forehead and mid facelift, endoscopic facelift, scarless facelift, face lift, face-lift
Follow-up: Facelift, Subperiosteal