Introduction
The management of complex abdominal wall defects has been perplexing to both general surgeons and reconstructive surgeons since the turn of the last century. The goals of the reconstructive surgeon in managing complex abdominal wall defects are to restore the structural and functional continuity of the musculofascial system and to provide stable and durable wound coverage. The criterion standard of tissue selection for abdominal wall reconstruction is autologous tissue, which includes the use of adjacent tissue rearrangement techniques, regional flaps, and, occasionally, free tissue transfer.
The initial assessment of a patient with a complex abdominal wall defect should focus on which structures are present, absent, or distorted with respect to each anatomical layer of the abdominal wall. Previous scars should be taken into consideration during preoperative planning. Incision design and knowledge of the vascular supply to the skin and soft tissue can be crucial, particularly in patients who have had multiple abdominal procedures. For example, a paucity of well vascularized skin and subcutaneous tissue may jeopardize the reconstructive outcome. This becomes particularly important if prosthetic material is required to replace an area of the musculofascial layer.
Reconstruction of the structural components of the abdominal wall is important, but even more important is the restoration of abdominal wall function. This concept is demonstrated in the components separation technique for ventral hernia repair, first reported by Ramirez and colleagues.1 This technique uses musculofascial components of the abdominal wall in continuity with their vascular and nerve supply to reconstruct ventral defects. A thorough understanding of structural and functional anatomy of the abdominal wall is essential to achieve a successful reconstruction.
Indications
Indications for abdominal wall reconstruction include defects caused by trauma, tumor extirpation, multiple previous abdominal procedures, and, occasionally, infection. Recently, with the great success of small bowel transplantation in infants with short gut syndrome, abdominal wall reconstructive principles have been employed to accommodate the small bowel from a living related adult into the abdominal cavity of an infant. Abdominal wall defects of any size may allow herniation of the abdominal viscera, which can lead to incarceration and, ultimately, strangulation. However, larger abdominal wall defects usually do not pose a threat of incarceration.
The rate of incisional hernia following celiotomy ranges from 3-20%. Factors associated with the formation of an incisional hernia include wound infection, immunosuppression, morbid obesity, previous operations, patient age, and medical conditions (eg, prostatism) that may cause an increase in intra-abdominal pressure postoperatively. Direct primary closure involves direct suture apposition of healthy strong fascial tissue on each side of the defect. However, recurrence rates after this procedure range from 41-52% during long-term follow-up. Herniorrhaphies in which large prosthetic meshes are implanted appear to have lower failure rates (12-4%).
Transverse incisions course parallel to the relaxed skin tension lines of the abdominal wall and tend to heal as thinner, flatter scars, as less tension is present on these wounds.2,3,4 Additionally, transverse incisions have the lowest rate of herniation compared to midline and paramedian incisions.5 The reason for this is that lateral traction of the external oblique, internal oblique, transversus abdominis, and rectus abdominis muscles places tension on the fascia at the linea alba and on the skin to increase risk of skin and fascial dehiscence. Increased intra-abdominal pressure, as observed with chronic lung disease, coughing, or ascites, can also contribute to the risk of incisional hernia. The authors have also found that the rate of hernia recurrence following repair is markedly reduced in patients who have transverse abdominal wall defects, even when prosthetic or bioprosthetic material has been used.
Of the various tumors that develop on the abdominal wall, desmoid tumors are the most common benign tumors. These lesions are histologically benign but locally invasive. Treatment consists of full-thickness abdominal wall resection. Methods for reconstruction of such defects include musculocutaneous flap reconstruction or the use of prosthetic or bioprosthetic material. For more detail, please see Media files 1-4 below. Local recurrence remains approximately 40% and usually occurs within 2 years, despite aggressive treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be required when margins are inadequate.
Treatment of malignant tumors of the abdominal wall requires aggressive resection of involved skin and subcutaneous tissue as well as the myofascial component, if it is violated by the tumor. Sarcomas are the most common and require both aggressive resection and radiotherapy. Intra-abdominal tumors can also involve the abdominal wall, either from contiguous or hematogenous spread. Reconstruction of the abdominal wall in these cases is usually directed by the extent of resection and the possibility of further surgical intervention.
Abdominal wall defects associated with traumatic abdominal injuries are commonly a result of gunshot injury. These abdominal wounds may be grossly contaminated from simultaneous bowel injuries and require delayed reconstruction in multiple stages.
Abdominal wall soft tissue infections are rare except as a complication of a prior mesh repair of abdominal fascia. However, cases of necrotizing fasciitis following inadvertent bowel injury during abdominal liposuction have been reported. Abdominal wall mesh infections commonly present as draining sinuses over the abdomen. Mesh infections are resistant to wound care and antibiotics. Often, successful treatment of the abdominal infection requires removal of the infected mesh and staged abdominal reconstruction.
Patient selection is also crucial. Performing a technically sound operation on a patient with multiple comorbidities may result in an outcome that is less than optimal. For a discussion of patient selection and preoperative considerations, see Preoperative considerations.
Relevant Anatomy
Anterior Abdominal Wall Anatomy
The anatomical layers of the abdominal wall include skin, subcutaneous tissue, superficial fascia, deep fascia, muscle, extraperitoneal fascia, and peritoneum. This anatomy may vary with respect to the different topographic regions of the abdomen. The major source of structural integrity and strength of the abdominal wall is provided by the musculofascial layer. The main paired abdominal muscles include the external oblique muscles, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis muscles, and rectus abdominis muscles and their respective aponeuroses, which are interdigitated with each other, and provide core strength and protection to the abdominal wall viscera. The integrity of the abdominal wall is essential not only to protect the visceral structures but also to stabilize the trunk and to aid trunk movement and posture.
Skeletal System
Early 19th century anatomist August Rauber described the large gap in the skeletal system between the lower edges of the thorax and the upper edge of the pelvis as the lacuna sceleti sterno-pubica. This gap is closed by the abdominal muscles and their aponeuroses. The skeletal system, which is relatively fixed, provides attachment points for the soft tissue and muscles of the abdominal wall. The skeletal anatomy of the abdomen consists of the xiphoid process, the costal cartilages of ribs 7-10, the floating ribs 11 and 12, the L1-L5 vertebrae, the iliac crests, the anterior superior iliac spine, the pubic tubercle/pubic crest, and the pubic symphysis. The abdominal wall musculoaponeurotic structure is attached to the ribs superiorly, the bones of the pelvis inferiorly, and the vertebral column posteriorly.
Subcutaneous Tissue
Superficial fascia
The superficial fascia of the abdominal wall is divided into a superficial and a deep layer. It may be as thin as half an inch or less or as thick as 6 inches or more. Above the umbilicus, the superficial fascia consists of a single layer. Below the umbilicus, the fascia divides into 2 layers: the Camper fascia (a superficial fatty layer) and the Scarpa fascia (a deep membranous layer). The superficial epigastric neurovascular bundle is located between these 2 layers. The abdominal subcutaneous fat, which is separated by the Scarpa fascia, is highly variable in thickness. The clinical relevance of this anatomy is appreciated when designing superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The SIEA flap has been used as a pedicled flap for hand reconstruction or as a free flap in breast reconstruction.
Deep fascia
The deep fascia is a thin, tough layer that surrounds and is adherent to the underlying abdominal muscles. Each abdominal muscle has an aponeurotic component that contributes to the deep fascia. The individual abdominal muscles are described below.
Subserous and peritoneal fascia
The subserous fascia is also known as extraperitoneal fascia and serves to bond the peritoneum to the deep fascia of the abdominal wall or to the outer lining of the gastrointestinal tract. It may receive different names depending on its location (ie, transversalis fascia when it is deep to that muscle, psoas fascia when it is next to that muscle, iliac fascia, and so on). The peritoneum is a thin (one cell thick) membrane that lines the abdominal cavity. It is useful in reconstructive efforts because it provides a layer between the bowel and mesh. Also, studies have exemplified the utility of the thin, pliable, peritoneal-lined rectus flap in vaginal wall reconstructions.
Musculofascial layer
The abdominal wall includes 5 paired muscles (3 flat muscles, 2 vertical muscles). The 3 flat muscles are the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis. The 3-layered structure, combined with extensive aponeuroses, works in a synkinetic fashion not only to protect the abdominal viscera but also to increase abdominal pressure, which facilitates defecation, micturition, and parturition. The 2 vertical muscles are the rectus abdominis and pyramidalis. Fusion of the fascial layers of these muscles forms 3 distinct fascial lines: the linea alba and 2 semilunar lines. The linea alba is formed by the fusion of both rectus sheaths at the midline, while the semilunar lines are formed by the union of the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis aponeuroses at the lateral border of the rectus abdominis muscle.
External oblique
The external oblique muscle is the largest and thickest of the flat abdominal wall muscles. It originates from the lower 8 ribs, interlocks with slips of latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior, and courses inferior-medially, attaching via its aponeurosis centrally at the linea alba. Inferiorly, the external oblique aponeurosis folds back upon itself and forms the inguinal ligament between the anterior superior iliac spine and the pubic tubercle. Medial to the pubic tubercle, the external oblique aponeurosis is attached to the pubic crest. Traveling superior to the medial part of the inguinal ligament, an opening in the aponeurosis forms the superficial inguinal ring. The innervation to the external oblique is derived from the lower 6 thoracic anterior primary rami and the first and second lumbar anterior primary rami.
Internal oblique
The internal oblique muscle originates from the anterior portion of the iliac crest, lateral half to two-thirds of the inguinal ligament, and posterior aponeurosis of the transversus abdominis muscle. The internal oblique fibers run superior-anteriorly at right angles to the external oblique and insert on the cartilages of the lower 4 ribs. The anterior fibers become aponeurotic at around the ninth costal cartilage. At the lateral border of the rectus abdominis muscle and above the arcuate line, the aponeurosis splits anteriorly and posteriorly to enclose the rectus muscle to help form the rectus sheaths. However beneath the arcuate line, the internal oblique aponeurosis does not split, resulting in an absent posterior rectus sheath. The inferior aponeurotic fibers arch over the spermatic cord, pass through the inguinal canal and then descend posterior to the superficial ring to attach to the pubic crest. The most inferior medial tendinous fibers fuse with the aponeurotic fibers of the transversus abdominis muscle to form the conjoint tendon, which also inserts on the pubic crest.
Transversus abdominis
The transversus abdominis muscle is the innermost of the 3 flat abdominal muscles. The fibers of the transversus abdominis course predominately in a horizontal orientation. It has 2 fleshy origins and 1 aponeurotic origin. The first fleshy origin is from the anterior three-fourths of the iliac crest and lateral third of the inguinal ligament, while the second origin is from the inner surface of the lower 6 costal cartilages where they interdigitate with fibers of the diaphragm. Between the 2 fleshy origins is the aponeurotic origin from the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae. These fibers course medially to the lateral border of the rectus muscle. From about 6.6 cm inferior to the xiphoid process to the arcuate line, the insertion is aponeurotic and contributes to the formation of the posterior rectus sheath.
Rectus abdominis
The rectus abdominis muscles are paired, long, straplike muscles that are the principal vertical muscles of the anterior abdominal wall. The rectus abdominis is interrupted throughout its length by 3-4 tendinous inscriptions, all of which are adherent to the anterior rectus sheath and separated by the linea alba. These inscriptions can be visualized externally in a well-developed individual secondary to fasciocutaneous ligaments. The medial tendon of the rectus abdominis originates from the pubic symphysis and the lateral tendon of the rectus abdominis originates from the pubic crest. It inserts to the anterior surfaces of the fifth, sixth, and seventh costal cartilages and xiphoid process. The lateral border of each rectus muscle and its sheath merge with the aponeurosis of the external oblique to form the linea semilunaris. The rectus abdominis muscle functions as a tensor of the abdominal wall and flexor of the vertebrae. Additionally, this muscle helps to stabilize the pelvis during walking, protects the abdominal viscera, and aids in forced expiration.
The rectus sheath is a strong, semifibrous compartment that houses the rectus muscles, the superior and inferior epigastric vessels, and the inferior 5 intercostal and subcostal nerves. It is formed by interlacing aponeurotic fibers from the 3 flat abdominal muscles. The anterior rectus sheath is the union of the external oblique aponeurosis and the anterior layer of the internal oblique. The posterior rectus sheath is composed of the posterior layer of the internal oblique aponeurosis, the transversus abdominis aponeurosis, and the transversalis fascia. Superior to the costal margin, the posterior rectus sheath is absent because the internal oblique muscle is attached to the costal margin and the transversus abdominis courses internal to the costal cartilages.
Pyramidalis
The pyramidalis is a small triangular muscle located anterior to the inferior aspect of the rectus abdominis; the pyramidalis is absent in about 20% of the population. The pyramidalis originates from the body of the pubis directly inferior to the insertion of the rectus abdominis and inserts into the linea alba inferior to the umbilicus to assist in stabilization of the lower midline.
Arcuate line
Above the arcuate line, the anterior rectus fascia exists anterior to the rectus muscle, and the posterior rectus fascia is posterior to the rectus muscle. Below the arcuate line, the 3 aponeuroses merge together to form exclusively the anterior rectus sheath, with little or no posterior sheath. The arcuate line is generally located 2 fingerbreadths from the umbilicus to midway between the umbilicus and pubis. However, some reports in the literature state that the arcuate line is closer to 75% of the distance between the pubic crest and the umbilicus or 1.8 cm superior to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS).
Linea alba
The linea alba is the fusion of the anterior and posterior rectus fascia; it is located in the abdominal midline, between the rectus muscles, from the xiphoid to the pubis. The linea alba is a 3-dimensional composition of tendon fibers from abdominal wall muscles. Midline insertions of these fibers play a significant role in stabilizing the abdominal wall. The cranial aspect is attached to the xiphoid process, while, caudally, it inserts at the pubic symphysis.
Linea semilunaris
The linea semilunares can be seen as a pair of linear impressions in the skin that correspond with the most lateral edges of the rectus abdominis. These lines are visible in a person who is physically fit but obscured in a person who is obese. They are formed by the band of aponeuroses of the external oblique, the internal oblique, and the transversus abdominis muscles.
Vascular Supply and Innervation
The plane between the internal oblique muscle and transversus abdominis muscle contains the neurovascular structures that supply the abdominal muscles. The superior and inferior deep epigastric vessels enter the rectus muscle superiorly and inferiorly. Transperitoneal vessels enter the rectus in the periumbilical region. The abdominal wall receives its blood supply from direct cutaneous vessels and musculocutaneous perforating vessels.6 The 2 subdivisions of perforators course medially and laterally. The lateral branch is usually the dominant branch and contains most of the perforator vessels.7 The lateral fasciocutaneous perforators pierce the aponeuroses of the internal and external oblique muscles. They may pass through the linea alba and emerge on the lateral aspect of the rectus abdominis.7
El-Mrakby et al performed microdissections to analyze the vascular anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall. They concluded that the musculocutaneous perforators are the main providers of blood supply to the anterior abdominal wall.8 Also, the vessels were further categorized into large (direct) or small (indirect) perforators. The indirect perforators generally have diameters less than 0.5 mm and terminate in the deep layer of the subcutaneous fat.8 Conversely, the direct perforators have diameters greater than 0.5 mm and course into the subdermal plexus to supply the superficial subcutaneous fat and skin.8 In addition, El-Mrakby et al described the area lateral and inferior to the umbilicus as the area with the richest concentration of perforator vessels.8 This vascular network allows multiple flap designs that may incorporate one or several perforator vessels.
A study by Huger et al classified the vascular blood supply of the abdominal wall into 3 simple zones for abdominoplasty.9
Zone I is defined by the mid abdomen and is supplied primarily by the deep epigastric arcade. As the internal thoracic artery passes behind the costal cartilages to enter the abdominal wall, it gives rise to the superior epigastric artery. This vessel then enters the abdomen and travels underneath the surface of the posterior rectus sheath. The superior epigastric artery joins the deep inferior epigastric artery through a series of choke vessels within the rectus above the umbilicus.
Zone II is defined by the lower abdomen and is supplied by branches of the epigastric arcade and the external iliac artery. Blood supply superficial to the fascia is provided by the superficial epigastric and superficial pudendal arteries. Both of these arteries originate from the femoral artery. The deep iliac circumflex artery originates from the external iliac and runs deep to all abdominal muscles to provide blood supply to the area of the anterior iliac spine; it also pierces all 3 muscles of the lateral abdominal wall and provides a sizable musculocutaneous perforator.
Zone III comprises the flanks and lateral abdomen. Blood supply to this area comes from the intercostal, subcostal, and lumbar arteries. The intercostal vessels leave the rib cage and enter the abdominal wall between the transversus abdominis and internal oblique muscles, where they anastomose with the lateral branches of the superior epigastric artery and deep inferior epigastric artery.
Sensory innervation to the abdomen is derived from the roots of the nerves T7 to L4. These nerves travel in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Motor innervation is provided by the intercostal, subcostal, iliohypogastric, and ilioinguinal nerves. These nerves must be preserved during abdominal wall reconstruction in order to maintain abdominal wall sensation and muscular function.
Contraindications
As stated above, patients with significant comorbidity and low potential benefit of hernia repair are poor candidates for abdominal wall reconstruction. Patients with conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart disease, and liver failure must be preoperatively screened. Postoperatively, patients with COPD may be difficult or impossible to wean from the ventilator. Intra-abdominal operations involve large fluid shifts and place a significant stress on the heart intraoperatively and postoperatively, with intravascular return of third space volume (ie, on postoperative day 3).
In addition, patients with liver failure have high morbidity and mortality rates with operations that require general anesthesia and should not undergo elective abdominal wall reconstruction. The risk of such a major operation for patients with the above comorbid conditions must be defined, as these risks almost always outweigh the benefit of abdominal wall reconstruction.
Other relative contraindications to elective abdominal wall reconstruction/ventral hernia repair include preexisting conditions that may increase the risk of recurrence (ie, smoking, mild COPD, obesity, diabetes, ascites, cancer, multiple hernia recurrences, a noncompliant patient). For more information on these conditions, visit the following Medscape Resource Centers: Smoking, COPD, Diabetes, Hernia.
More on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
Overview: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
| Treatment: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
| Follow-up: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
| Multimedia: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
| References |
| Next Page » |
References
Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1990;86(3):519-26. [Medline].
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Phillips LG. Langer's lines: to use or not to use. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1999;104(1):208-14. [Medline].
Kraissl CJ. The selection of appropriate lines for elective surgical incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1951;8:1.
Conway H. Notes on cutaneous healing in wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1938;676:140.
Carlson G, Bostwick. Abdominal wall reconstruction. In: Achauer BM, Eriksson E, Guturon B, Coleman J, Russell R, Vander Kolk, CA, eds. Plastic Surgery: Indications, Operations, and Outcomes. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000:563-74.
Nahai F, Brown RG, Vasconez LO. Blood supply to the abdominal wall as related to planning abdominal incisions. Am Surg. Sep 1976;42(9):691-5. [Medline].
Taylor GI. The angiosomes of the body and their supply to perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 2003;30(3):331-42, v. [Medline].
El-Mrakby HH, Milner RH. The vascular anatomy of the lower anterior abdominal wall: a microdissection study on the deep inferior epigastric vessels and the perforator branches. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 2002;109(2):539-43; discussion 544-7. [Medline].
Huger WE Jr. The anatomic rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Am Surg. Sep 1979;45(9):612-7. [Medline].
Byrd HS, Hobar PC. Abdominal wall expansion in congenital defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1989;84(2):347-52. [Medline].
Hamilton JE. The repair of large or difficult hernias with mattressed onlay grafts of fascia lata: a 21-year experience. Ann Surg. Jan 1968;167(1):85-90. [Medline].
Crawford JS. Nature of fascia lata and its fate after implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. Jun 1969;67(6):900-7. [Medline].
Matloub HS, Jensen P, Grunert BK, Sanger JR, Yousif NJ. Characteristics of prosthetic mesh and autogenous fascia in abdominal wall reconstruction after prolonged implantation. Ann Plast Surg. Dec 1992;29(6):508-11. [Medline].
Bauer JJ, Salky BA, Gelernt IM, Kreel I. Repair of large abdominal wall defects with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). Ann Surg. Dec 1987;206(6):765-9. [Medline].
Okunski WJ, Sonntag BV, Murphy RX Jr. Staged reconstruction of abdominal wall defects after intra-abdominal catastrophes. Ann Plast Surg. May 1996;36(5):475-8. [Medline].
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG. Creep vs. stretch: a review of the viscoelastic properties of skin. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 1998;41(2):215-9. [Medline].
Hobar PC, Rohrich RJ, Byrd HS. Abdominal-wall reconstruction with expanded musculofascial tissue in a posttraumatic defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1994;94(2):379-83. [Medline].
Huwitz DJ, Hollins RR. Reconstruction of the abdominal wall and groin. In: Cohen M, Goldwyn RM, eds. Mastery of Plast and Reconstruction Surgery. ed. Boston: Little Brown; 1994:1357.
Nahai F, Hill L, Hester TR. Experiences with the tensor fascia lata flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1979;63(6):788-99. [Medline].
Dibbell DG Jr, Mixter RC, Dibbell DG Sr. Abdominal wall reconstruction (the "mutton chop" flap). Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1991;87(1):60-5. [Medline].
Ger R, Duboys E. The prevention and repair of large abdominal-wall defects by muscle transposition: a preliminary communication. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1983;72(2):170-8. [Medline].
Hartrampf CR Jr. The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction. A 7-year experience. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1988;15(4):703-16. [Medline].
Larson GM, Vandertoll DJ. Approaches to repair of ventral hernia and full-thickness losses of the abdominal wall. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1984;64(2):335-49. [Medline].
Law NW, Ellis H. A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects--an experimental study. Surgery. May 1991;109(5):652-5. [Medline].
Poole GV Jr. Mechanical factors in abdominal wound closure: the prevention of fascial dehiscence. Surgery. Jun 1985;97(6):631-40. [Medline].
Stoppa RE. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg. Sep-Oct 1989;13(5):545-54. [Medline].
Wantz GE. Incisional hernioplasty with Mersilene. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Feb 1991;172(2):129-37. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
abdominal wall reconstruction, abdominal reconstruction, abdominal defect, abdominal wall defect, tissue rearrangement, regional flap, free tissue transfer, abdominal layer, abdominal wall, abdominal procedure, abdomen defect, abdominal wall function, ventral hernia repair, ventral defect, abdominal viscera herniation, hernia, hernia reconstruction, incisional hernia, celiotomy, intraabdominal pressure, herniorrhaphies, desmoid tumor, abdominal tumor, abdominal gunshot injury, abdominal gunshot
Overview: Abdominal Wall Reconstruction