Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Perineal Reconstruction Treatment & Management

  • Author: Chet L Nastala, MD; Chief Editor: Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS  more...
 
Updated: Feb 16, 2016
 

Preoperative Details

Obtain a full preoperative evaluation of the patient. This includes determination of the patient's history of the present illness with regard to status of the radiation dose and in particular, the radiation ports. Chronically indurated or erythematous tissue should be noted and potentially removed with ablation. Also explore chronic problems with fistula formation.

Next

Intraoperative Details

Gracilis flap [2, 3, 4, 5, 17, 18]

The operative technique for the gracilis flap is outlined below.

  • Careful marking of the flap and skin island preoperatively is critical. This may be accomplished with the patient in the standing position and checked in the supine or lithotomy position.
  • Assess the gracilis origin and insertion and draw a line from the pubic tubercle to the distal semitendinosus tendon.
  • The skin paddle can be designed up to 10 cm wide, allowing a primary closure of the donor site.
  • In general, accomplish the anterior incision first and raise the subcutaneous tissue as a flap anteriorly on the thigh. This allows for harvesting a larger portion of muscle fascia than that which directly underlies the skin paddle, capturing additional septocutaneous perforators. See image below.
    Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis myocut Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis myocutaneous flaps raised.
  • As the fascia is elevated anteriorly, identify the gracilis tendon distally and confirm the location of the skin paddle directly over the proximal muscle by "bowstringing" the tendon. The saphenous vein remains anterior to the flap.
  • With the dominant proximal pedicle exposed, ligate and divide the distal pedicles from the superficial femoral artery.
  • Additional mobilization may be achieved by dissecting proximally to the profundus origin, dividing the branches that enter the adductor brevis and longus. This translocates the rotation point of the flap to approximately 7-8 cm below the pubic tubercle. Visualize and divide the obturator nerve.
  • The muscle is not divided at its attachments to the pubic tubercle unless required for mobilization, thus providing a secondary blood supply through the proximal branches of the obturator vessels.
  • The skin panel can be made into a complete island and tunneled into the perineum underneath the remaining perineal skin.
  • Myocutaneous flaps can be rotated clockwise from the left thigh and counterclockwise from the contralateral thigh. Perform this with the patient in the lithotomy position with the hips adducted 45° and slightly flexed 15° while the knees are flexed slightly, taking pressure off the peroneal nerve. If these flaps are used to restore the pelvic cavity, they can be tubed to create a neovagina.
  • For eliminating pelvic dead space, the flaps may be de-epithelialized as necessary.
  • The image below depicts postoperative healing after application of bilateral gracilis flaps.
    Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis flaps Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis flaps for neovaginal reconstruction following postoperative healing.

Rectus abdominis flap [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]

The rectus abdominis flap, distally based in the deep inferior epigastric vessels, provides several distinct advantages over bilateral gracilis flap reconstruction. Its most obvious advantage is the robust skin paddle that can be de-epithelialized for bulk or tubed for neovaginal reconstruction. For large pelvic exenteration defects, the rectus abdominis muscle can be used alone or in combination with the de-epithelialized skin paddle. This flap is well perfused by the robust dominant pedicle and the deep inferior gastric artery and vein. In addition, this flap provides adequate muscle bulk to obliterate pelvic dead space (see image below). The skin island can be used for resurfacing the perineal region, including the vaginal wall, and provides versatility for all patterns of resection.[8]

Perineal reconstruction. Demonstration of the peri Perineal reconstruction. Demonstration of the perineal defect and large dead space to be obliterated. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.

The operative technique for the rectus abdominis flap is outlined below.

  • The cutaneous paddle can be designed in various ways along the epigastric region using the superior subcostal musculocutaneous perforators of the upper abdominal wall.
  • The well-perfused region extends from below the costal margin to below the umbilicus and is approximately 20-25 cm long, directly overlying the rectus muscle.
  • The skin paddle of 8-10 cm width usually can be closed primarily. However, if a larger paddle is desired, skin grafting usually is necessary and may be tenuous over the fascial closure. Alternative skin paddle designs to the longitudinally based pattern include a transverse orientation.
  • If the pattern is to be de-epithelialized, this can be performed to resurface a large perineal defect. As the flap is elevated, the anterior fascia sacrifice remains somewhat narrower than the skin paddle. Thus, a strip of anterior rectus sheath, both lateral and medial, can be closed primarily.
  • Detach the rectus muscle from its superior attachments to the lower costal margin and divide the superior epigastric vessels with cautery. The flap must be mobilized sufficiently by dividing the inferior intercostal perforators. See image below.
    Perineal reconstruction. This 70-year-old man with Perineal reconstruction. This 70-year-old man with recurrent rectal cancer underwent a completion abdominal perineal resection and pelvic exenteration including resection of his bladder. The patient also had received external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis to help treat his cancer, making primary closure of the perineal skin unreliable. The operation left a very large defect in the perineal area including a large dead space in the pelvis. This was reconstructed using a pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). This image shows the flap as it was elevated off the anterior abdominal wall. The flap is very well perfused and has sufficient bulk to fill the pelvic canal and obliterate the dead space. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.
  • After transposition into the perineal region through the pelvic defect (see image below), close the abdominal donor site. Use closed suction drains for both the donor and recipient sites.
    Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset into the perin Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset into the perineal defect showing good vascularity. The patient recovered uneventfully and went on to complete healing without difficulty. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.

In a study of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection and neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer, Touny et al found the perineal wound complication rate associated with the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM) procedure for perineal reconstruction to be lower than that for primary perineal wound closure. In the prospective, randomized study of 60 patients with low rectal cancer, the investigators found that perineal wound complications occurred in 17.2% of patients who underwent VRAM and in 46.4% of patients treated with primary perineal wound closure, although surgical time and operative blood loss were lower in the latter group. The prevalence of abdominal wound morbidity was not significantly different between the two procedures.[19]

Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap

Although the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become well-established as an accepted technique for breast and trunk reconstruction, its use in the perineum as both a pedicled and free flap has become more common. An advantage of the DIEP flap over pedicled rectus myocutaneous techniques is significantly less abdominal wall morbidity.[15] However, this advantage may be outweighed by some considerations. First, the technical difficulties in flap harvest must be overcome by the steep learning curve with difficulties in flap venous insufficiency and perforator injury. Second, limitations in flap design with the DIEP flap make its use in perineal reconstruction more challenging than pedicled vertical rectus techniques.

Please refer to the perforator flap article in breast reconstruction for the technical details in flap harvest. In summary, the DIEP flap is designed as a horizontal skin island extending from the umbilicus to the suprapubic crease. Harvest includes no rectus abdominis muscle but a large segment of lower abdominal wall subcutaneous tissue, the Scarpa fascia, and the fatty layer below the Scarpa fascia. Once the tissue is freed to the level of the deep inferior epigastric vessels, the flap may be transposed into the pelvis without free tissue transfer; care should be taken not to kink or place tension on the pedicle.

Split gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap

While many variations of gluteus maximus flaps have been described,[20, 21] the split gluteal flap is particularly useful in resurfacing pelvic defects.[13] In this flap, only the superficial 1-1.5 cm of gluteal muscle is harvested, supplied by the proximal parasacral perforators. This allows elevation of the gluteal region primarily as a musculofascial cutaneous flap.

The operative technique for this flap is outlined below.

  • With the patient in the prone jackknife position, mark the flap based proximally on the sacral border along the direction of the gluteus muscle fibers for an appropriate width to cover the defect.
  • Elevate the flap from distal to proximal, splitting through the superficial 1-2 cm of the gluteus maximal muscle.
  • Carry dissection proximally to within 1 cm of the sacral border while the deep portion of the muscle remains in situ. The inferior gluteal artery is protected, and the inferior gluteal and sciatic nerves are deep to the plane of dissection. Bilateral elevation of these flaps may be required if the dead space is substantial (see image below).
    Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral split gluteal f Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral split gluteal flaps raised for obliteration of dead space. Note the myocutaneous flaps with gluteal musculature split longitudinally.
  • The images below depict the original defect and postoperative healing.
    Perineal reconstruction. Complex postoncologic per Perineal reconstruction. Complex postoncologic perineal defect following abdominoperineal resection with large dead space and anticipated postoperative irradiation (prone position).
    Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset with excellent Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset with excellent healing postoperatively. Patient management similar to pressure sore protocol with air-fluidized mattress followed by early ambulation.

Gluteal thigh flap [22]

The gluteal thigh flap may provide a reliable, versatile reconstruction of perineal defects, with low donor site morbidity. This flap includes the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle and encompasses the territory of the posterior thigh, directly supplied by the descending branch of the inferior gluteal artery.

The anatomy and technique for the gluteal thigh flap are outlined below.

  • The design of the flap is centered on the descending branch of the inferior gluteal artery. Outline the flap on the central axis of the posterior thigh, perpendicular to the gluteal crease, with the rotation point 5 cm above the ischial tuberosity. It extends to 5-7 cm above the popliteal fascia.
  • As the flap is elevated, divide the fascia lata and elevate the fascia overlying the hamstring musculature along with the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh.
  • Ligate deep perforators as dissection proceeds proximally and elevate the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle, with the flap up to the lower border of the piriformis muscle. The flap may remain sensate and provides excellent cover for the perineal region. It may be de-epithelialized in its distal portion and tubed for distal vaginal reconstruction.
  • A disadvantage includes a "dog ear" formation at the medial rotation point, which may require secondary revision.

Regional fasciocutaneous flaps

The use of fasciocutaneous flaps in perineal reconstruction is well described and the vascular anatomy of the perineal region is quite distinct. The super-fascial plane contains 3-5 segmental musculocutaneous perforators from the superficial vascular plexus. Venous drainage is by way of vena comitantes, thus a proximally based fascial cutaneous thigh flap can be designed with the flap base located approximately 5 cm from the perineum to preserve proximal vascular supply. This allows for primary closure of the donor site. The anterolateral thigh perforator (ATP) flap has enjoyed recent success in perineal reconstruction. Pedicled ATP island flaps can be used for reconstructing perineal defects up to 20 cm in size. Although the vascular anatomy is quite variable, it is well-described as a septocutaneous or musculocutaneous perforator.[23]

Subcutaneous and musculocutaneous perforators differ from the gracilis musculocutaneous flap. When the defect is superficial and dead space obliteration is not required, these may be appropriate flaps for perineal reconstruction. However, in the irradiated field or if postoperative radiation is planned, use caution in the design of these regional flaps.

Previous
Next

Complications

A common complication is ischemia of the overlying skin paddle, resulting in delayed healing or partial or complete skin paddle loss. This often is related to an imprecise location of the skin island territory over the gracilis muscle or failure to include perforators to the overlying skin. The skin paddle can be positioned accurately by carefully marking the patient prior to induction of anesthesia in a standing position, drawing a line from the pubic tubercle to the distal semitendinosus tendon. This outlines the anterior border of the skin paddle and the gracilis muscle. With the patient anesthetized and in the lithotomy position, posterior displacement of the skin paddle occurs due to gravity, allowing for inaccurate marking and malposition of the flap skin territory.

Another common mistake is to inadequately harvest the septocutaneous perforators with the elevation of the muscle, causing ischemia of the overlying skin paddle. This may be prevented by dissecting the fascia widely on either side of the narrow gracilis muscle, including additional perforators with the flap. The muscle still may be used if the skin paddle is not perfused.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Gracilis myocutaneous reconstruction of perineal defects has the added advantages of reliability and long-standing use. Since its original description by McCraw,[3] it has proved to be a time-honored workhorse for perineal reconstruction. Functional donor site morbidity is minimal, with the other thigh adductors serving to take over muscular function. In addition, the bulk of these flaps provides soft tissue fill where required. However, the bulk may limit the aesthetics of the reconstruction if the defect is more superficial.

The rectus abdominis flap provides several advantages over bilateral gracilis flap reconstruction. The robust skin paddle can be de-epithelialized for bulk or tubed for neovaginal reconstruction. This flap is well perfused by the deep inferior gastric artery and provides adequate muscle bulk to obliterate dead space. The skin island is versatile both for resurfacing the perineal region and for reconstructing the vaginal vault.

The split gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap and the gluteal thigh flap are particularly useful in resurfacing pelvic defects. They both provide a reliable, versatile reconstruction of perineal defects with low donor site morbidity. In addition, the gluteal thigh flap may remain sensate when taken with the posterior thigh sensory branch and may be de-epithelialized and tubed for distal vaginal reconstruction. "Dog ear" formation remains a problem at the medial rotation point and may require secondary revision.

Regional fasciocutaneous flaps remain useful in perineal reconstruction when the defect is superficial. When dead space obliteration is not required, they may provide a more cosmetic contour than musculocutaneous flaps. However, use caution in the irradiated field or if postoperative radiation is planned.

A study by Wang et al indicated that in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection or pelvic exenteration for anorectal cancer, immediate flap reconstruction of the perineum carries a lower risk than primary wound closure of a subsequent chronic draining wound. However, flap reconstruction was also associated with a higher rate of local infectious complications, although the investigators attributed this to a greater incidence of comorbidities in the group of study patients chosen for the flap procedure.[24]

A study by Seo et al indicated that in vascularized free flap reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the perineal or inguinal regions, acceptable flap survival can be achieved by using a perforator artery as the recipient artery. The study involved 13 patients, with no instances of flap necrosis, arterial insufficiency, venous congestion, or infection.[25]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Chet L Nastala, MD Plastic, Reconstructive, and Microsurgical Associates of South Texas, PA

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS Consulting Staff, Private Practice

Jaime R Garza, MD, DDS, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, Texas Medical Association, Texas Society of Plastic Surgeons

Disclosure: Received none from Allergan for speaking and teaching; Received none from LifeCell for consulting; Received grant/research funds from GID, Inc. for other.

Chief Editor

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chief, Division of Plastic Surgery, Residency Program Director, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Director, Center for Advanced Surgical Aesthetics

Jorge I de la Torre, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Association for Academic Surgery, Medical Association of the State of Alabama

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Associate Chief of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Dennis P Orgill, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Plastic Surgery Research Council, American Medical Association, Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Integra LifeSciences, Inc for consulting; Received consulting fee from Integra LifeSciences, Inc. for program and training services agreement; Received grant/research funds from Integra LifeSciences, Inc. for clinical research; Received grant/research funds from KCI for basic science research; Received grant/research funds from KCI for clinical research; Received consulting fee from DSM for consulting; Received consulting fee from Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundatio.

References
  1. Brodbeck R, Horch RE, Arkudas A, Beier JP. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Treatment of Oncological Perineal and Genital Defects. Front Oncol. 2015. 5:212. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Ducic I, Dayan JH, Attinger CE, Curry P. Complex perineal and groin wound reconstruction using the extended dissection technique of the gracilis flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug. 122 (2):472-8. [Medline].

  3. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE. Vaginal reconstruction with gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976 Aug. 58(2):176-83. [Medline].

  4. Nastala CL, McCraw JB, McMellin A. Vaginal reconstruction using the gracilis myocutaneous flap. In: Alter G, ed. Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery of the External Genitalia. WB Saunders Co. 1998.

  5. Persichetti P, Cogliandro A, Marangi GF, et al. Pelvic and perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: the role of gracilis flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Aug. 59(2):168-72. [Medline].

  6. Bell SW, Dehni N, Chaouat M, et al. Primary rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for repair of perineal and vaginal defects after extended abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg. 2005 Apr. 92(4):482-6. [Medline].

  7. Buchel EW, Finical S, Johnson C. Pelvic reconstruction using vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Jan. 52(1):22-6. [Medline].

  8. Hui K, Zhang F, Pickus E, et al. Modification of the vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM) flap for functional reconstruction of complex vulvoperineal defects. Ann Plast Surg. 2003 Dec. 51(6):556-60. [Medline].

  9. Sunesen KG, Buntzen S, Tei T, Lindegaard JC, Norgaard M, Laurberg S. Perineal healing and survival after anal cancer salvage surgery: 10-year experience with primary perineal reconstruction using the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan. 16(1):68-77. [Medline].

  10. Tobin GR, Day TG. Vaginal and pelvic reconstruction with distally based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Jan. 81(1):62-73. [Medline].

  11. Weiwei L, Zhifei L, Ang Z, Lin Z, Dan L, Qiaoqun. Vaginal reconstruction with the muscle-sparing vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Oct 18. [Medline].

  12. McMenamin DM, Clements D, Edwards TJ, Fitton AR, Douie WJ. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for perineal reconstruction: modifications to the technique based on a large single-centre experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Jul. 93(5):375-81. [Medline].

  13. Gould WL, Montero N, Cukic J, et al. The "split" gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Feb. 93(2):330-6. [Medline].

  14. Eo S, Kim D, Jones NF. Microdissection thinning of a pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for burn scar contracture of the groin: case report. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005 Oct. 21(7):447-50; discussion 451-2. [Medline].

  15. Muneuchi G, Ohno M, Shiota A, et al. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for vulvar reconstruction after radical vulvectomy: a less invasive and simple procedure utilizing an abdominal incision wound. Ann Plast Surg. 2005 Oct. 55(4):427-9. [Medline].

  16. Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M, Monstrey SJ. Soft tissue reconstruction with the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg. 2003 Jul. 30(3):371-82. [Medline].

  17. Yun IS, Lee JH, Rah DK, Lee WJ. Perineal reconstruction using a bilobed pudendal artery perforator flap. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Sep. 118(3):313-6. [Medline].

  18. Vyas RM, Pomahac B. Use of a bilobed gracilis myocutaneous flap in perineal and genital reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Aug. 65(2):225-7. [Medline].

  19. Touny A, Othman H, Maamoon S, et al. Perineal reconstruction using pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun 24. [Medline].

  20. Benito P, De Juan A, Cano M, Elena E. Reconstruction of an extensive perineal defect using two modified V-Y flaps based on perforators from the gluteus maximus muscle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Sep. 61(9):e1-4. [Medline].

  21. Di Mauro D, D'Hoore A, Penninckx F, De Wever I, Vergote I, Hierner R. V-Y bilateral gluteus maximus myocutaneous advancement flap in the reconstruction of large perineal defects after resection of pelvic malignancies. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jul 15. [Medline].

  22. Hurwitz DJ, Walton RL. Closure of chronic wounds of the perineal and sacral regions using the gluteal thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1982 May. 8(5):375-86. [Medline].

  23. Wang X, Qiao Q, Burd A, et al. Perineum reconstruction with pedicled anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Feb. 56(2):151-5. [Medline].

  24. Wang ED, Conkling N, Xu X, et al. Perineal flap reconstruction following oncologic anorectal extirpation: an outcomes assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan. 135 (1):176e-84e. [Medline].

  25. Seo BF, Yun Choi J, Ho Han H, et al. Perforators as recipients for free flap reconstruction of the inguinal and perineal region. Microsurgery. 2015 Nov. 35 (8):627-33. [Medline].

  26. Abbott DE, Halverson AL, Wayne JD, Kim JY, Talamonti MS, Dumanian GA. The oblique rectus abdominal myocutaneous flap for complex pelvic wound reconstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug. 51(8):1237-41. [Medline].

  27. Nelson RA, Butler CE. Surgical outcomes of VRAM versus thigh flaps for immediate reconstruction of pelvic and perineal cancer resection defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jan. 123(1):175-83. [Medline].

  28. Nisar PJ, Scott HJ. Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Nov 14. [Medline].

  29. Said HK, Bevers M, Butler CE. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum with human acellular dermal matrix and thigh flaps following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Dec. 107(3):578-82. [Medline].

  30. Wang TN, Whetzel T, Mathes SJ, Vasconez LO. A fasciocutaneous flap for vaginal and perineal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987 Jul. 80(1):95-103. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Perineal reconstruction. This 70-year-old man with recurrent rectal cancer underwent a completion abdominal perineal resection and pelvic exenteration including resection of his bladder. The patient also had received external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis to help treat his cancer, making primary closure of the perineal skin unreliable. The operation left a very large defect in the perineal area including a large dead space in the pelvis. This was reconstructed using a pedicled vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM). This image shows the flap as it was elevated off the anterior abdominal wall. The flap is very well perfused and has sufficient bulk to fill the pelvic canal and obliterate the dead space. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.
Perineal reconstruction. Demonstration of the perineal defect and large dead space to be obliterated. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.
Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset into the perineal defect showing good vascularity. The patient recovered uneventfully and went on to complete healing without difficulty. Courtesy of Wayne Stadelman, MD, Louisville, KY.
Perineal reconstruction. Complex perineal defect following pelvic exenteration.
Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis myocutaneous flaps raised.
Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral gracilis flaps for neovaginal reconstruction following postoperative healing.
Perineal reconstruction. Complex postoncologic perineal defect following abdominoperineal resection with large dead space and anticipated postoperative irradiation (prone position).
Perineal reconstruction. Bilateral split gluteal flaps raised for obliteration of dead space. Note the myocutaneous flaps with gluteal musculature split longitudinally.
Perineal reconstruction. Flap inset with excellent healing postoperatively. Patient management similar to pressure sore protocol with air-fluidized mattress followed by early ambulation.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.