eMedicine Specialties > Plastic Surgery > Wound Healing

Vascular Ulcers: Treatment

Author: Allen Gabriel, MD, Director of Research, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Coauthor(s): Matthew C Camp, MD, Resident Surgeon, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center; Christian Paletta, MD, FACS, Professor, Division Chief and Program Director, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine; Brandon Massey, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 19, 2008

Treatment

Medical Therapy

The latest research on wound care has resulted in increased use of interactive and active dressings rather than passive dressings that cover and absorb. Interactive hydrocolloid dressings provide a controlled microenvironment for wound healing. Active dressings deliver substances such as growth factors, which are important in the healing cascade.

Interactive dressings are typically occlusive dressings. They provide important moisture and supply a favorable microenvironment for the growth of new tissue. The advantages of moist occlusive dressings are numerous. Exudate is controlled, while epithelial cell migration is encouraged. Eschar is liquefied and fibrin is lysed to allow convenient debridement. Infection is managed through wound fluid rich in leukocytes. These dressings are also believed to provide symptomatic relief, such as decreased pain and pruritus.

Dressings that deliver substances active in the healing process, such as growth factors, have been the subject of much recent investigation. While normal wounds heal because of epidermal division and migration within a neovascularized mesh of granulation tissue, resulting in a cover of new skin, chronic wounds typically show inadequate repair due to insufficient perfusion or wound infection.

Wounds caused by venous hypertension are commonly treated with multilayer compression dressings that assist the return of pooled blood to the central circulation. These dressings have shown good results, with 73% of wounds healing with no other intervention needed.7

Topically applied growth factors are meant to assist the chronic wound with establishing healthy granulation tissue or epidermal cell function for improved healing. Several growth factors have been studied to this end. Platelet-derived growth factor has been shown to reduce the size of chronic ulcers by up to 70%, as compared to 17% for placebo, probably via acceleration of provisional wound matrix deposition. Epidermal growth factor supplementation was associated with healing of 8 of 9 wounds in which therapy had previously failed. Fibroblast growth factor has also been studied, but positive results have not yet been achieved.

Chronic wounds may be associated with active infection, such as cellulitis. Additionally, an occasional chronic wound may be the nidus for bacteremia and sepsis. In these cases, administer systemic antibiotics. Alternatively, the wound itself may be infected, without systemic effects. Take steps to lower the bacterial count of these wounds, including topical methods to encourage wound healing.

Edlich et al have shown that dressing changes alone usually lower the bacterial load, regardless of the type.8 Silver sulfadiazine has been shown to almost universally reduce the bacterial load to levels acceptable for wound closure. It is a broad-spectrum antibiotic and does not cause pain, as has been noted with mafenide acetate (Sulfamylon). However, penetration of eschar is questionable with this antibiotic. Saline-dampened gauze dressing changes also reduce the bacterial load in the large majority of wounds, but not as effectively as silver sulfadiazine. Povidone-iodine solution (Betadine) has also been used as a topical antibiotic and is largely successful at reducing bacterial counts. However, a widely held belief is that this solution also kills granulation tissue, which significantly impairs healing of these wounds.

New investigations have focused on nonsurgical methods of improving the microcirculation of the healing wound. The use of low-intensity ultrasonic stimulation of venous ulcers has shown a significant improvement in the rate of wound healing from 29% in a control group to 63% in the experimental group. This increased rate of healing is thought to be mediated by stimulation of signal-transduction pathways directly involved in angiogenesis, leukocyte adhesion, and growth factor production.9

Investigations have highlighted the possibility of using injected low molecular weight heparin to speed healing in neurotrophic ulcers in the setting of occlusive peripheral artery disease. (Click here to complete a Medscape CME activity on predictors of PAD.) The rationale for this therapy is to improve the microcirculation of the healing wound by thinning the blood and increasing the flow of capillary flow of blood to the injured tissues. Data published by Kalani et al show 67% wound healing in patients treated with dalteparin compared to 47% healing in individuals treated with placebo.10 This medication also showed benefit in a lower rate of amputation, from 19% amputation rate in the placebo group to 5% rate of amputation in the dalteparin group.10 Oral therapies under investigation reportedly decrease the symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency but remain experimental at this time.11

Surgical Therapy

When considering surgical therapy for chronic vascular ulcers, consider which is more appropriate for the patient: (1) revascularization and/or coverage of the wound, (2) ligation of incompetent venous perforators, or (3) primary amputation and rehabilitation. The plastic surgeon has several options when choosing operative coverage of an ulcer.

When the ulcer is caused by venous reflux in the superficial venous system, the problem can be addressed with minimally invasive procedures commonly practiced by vascular surgeons. These surgeries include saphenofemoral junction disconnection, stripping of the long saphenous vein to below the knee, calf varicosity avulsions, or saphenopopliteal junction disconnection. The rate of wound healing for those treated with surgery is not significantly higher than that of patients who are treated conservatively, but the resultant diminished rate of wound recurrence is a benefit.7

Ligation of superficial venous perforators has been shown to reduce the 4-year recurrence rate of vascular ulcers, from 56% in ulcers treated by compression alone to 31% in ulcers treated by compression plus surgery (P < .01).12 This is a tremendous leap forward, as the natural history of these wounds is one of frequent recurrence. In the case of ulcers not caused by venous hypertension, other approaches must be considered.

Revision of the wound followed by split-thickness skin graft (STSG) has long been an option for chronic wound management. Once a clean, granulating wound bed has been established through debridement, placement of a skin graft is usually all that is required to attain closure. Skin grafting can be effective for coverage of venous ulcers, but attention must be paid to extremity elevation during healing. Ischemic wounds located in areas that are difficult to treat also may be closed with skin grafting; studies have reported closure rates of 40% for diabetic foot wounds.

Often, the wound bed is not suitable for grafting or a structure such as a bone or tendon is exposed. Under these circumstances, consider pedicled or free flaps. These flaps are desirable for several reasons. Healing is promoted even in a suboptimal bed. All diseased tissue, including bone, may be debrided or excised. Neovascularization of the ischemic bed from the flap may occur, and vascular graft patency may be improved by the vascular runoff provided by free tissue transfer.

Microvascular flap coverage of chronic ulcers has met with much success in the treatment of arterial ulcers. Colen performed 10 such transfers in patients with peripheral vascular disease; 7 of these patients had revascularization prior to the procedure.13 All anastomoses were successful, although 1 patient underwent amputation after sepsis and its cardiovascular sequelae. Ciresi and coworkers reported successful salvage of limb length and function in 5 of 7 patients who underwent free tissue transfer for ischemic ulcers.14

Recently, plastic surgeons have begun treating venous ulcers with free tissue transfer, with mixed results. Steffe and Caffee report a 43% complication rate after tissue transfer to venous wounds and the development of new ulcers in all patients at approximately 17 months.15 Alternatively, Kumins et al16 and Weinzweig and Schuler17 reported good success using free muscle flaps and skin grafting to cover venous ulcers. In the first study, all ulcers were healed, and the second study reports a 90% success rate. Both studies were notable for a low recurrence of ulceration and an acceptable complication rate.

Preoperative Details

Familiarity with the perfusion and vascular supply to the lower extremity is critical to the surgeon for operative planning. Studies estimating perfusion can help predict healing of the wound or flap. Specific knowledge of the arterial supply is invaluable when performing either pedicled or free tissue transfer. Angiography yields detailed visualization of the vessels. Colen and Musson advocate using duplex imaging to select both the recipient vessel and the region of the vessel most suitable for vascular anastomosis.18

Intraoperative Details

Normally, vascular ulcers are treated conservatively with nonoperative techniques. When treated surgically, STSG to the affected areas is the usual procedure.

Applying a skin graft to a vascular ulcer requires the same techniques as grafting to other wounds or burns. Varying degrees of ulcer debridement may be required prior to grafting.

Harvest a graft from an area of healthy tissue; it may be left in its contracted state or meshed for greater surface-area coverage. Then, apply the graft to the clean, granulating ulcer. It may be secured in place using sutures or skin staples. Grafts also adhere without suturing or stapling if protected well from disruptive forces.

Pedicled and free flaps also may be used for coverage of a vascular ulcer. A wide array of choices may be used, based on the location of the ulcer and the status of the vessels perfusing the various pedicled flaps. The patency of the vessel providing inflow for a free flap is also a consideration. The details for performing flap coverage of a chronic ulcer are best studied in a text dedicated to tissue flaps (eg, Flaps, Random Skin Flaps).

Complications

The greatest risk of complications in surgical coverage of vascular ulcers lies with tissue transfer. An obvious source of postoperative concern with regard to successful free tissue transfer is the vascular supply to the flap. The rate of vascular complications in flaps transferred to vascularly compromised tissue is not known, but Rieck et al report a 16% rate of vascular complications out of 631 cases of free tissue transfers.19 Yajima et al experienced 39 complications in 250 similar cases.20

The complication rate in patients with ischemic ulcers is expected to be higher than these rates because of the patients' primary diseases. Indeed, Lepantalo and Tukiainen observed vascular patency rates of 68% in their study.21 Ciresi et al report minor wound complications in 4 of 7 patients studied.14

Complication rates among cases of tissue transfer for venous ulceration are less well defined. Weinzweig and Schuler report a loss of 2 of 20 flaps, both due to vasospasm, although one occurred in a patient with a history of cocaine abuse.17 They also noted 3 cases of infection with partial flap and/or graft loss and 2 cases of partial graft loss. Steffe and Caffee experienced a loss of 2 of 14 flaps, caused by venous thrombosis.15 Two patients had partial flap necrosis in their study, while another 2 had partial graft loss.

More on Vascular Ulcers

Overview: Vascular Ulcers
Workup: Vascular Ulcers
Treatment: Vascular Ulcers
Follow-up: Vascular Ulcers
Multimedia: Vascular Ulcers
References

References

  1. O'Brien JF, Grace PA, Perry IJ, et al. Prevalence and aetiology of leg ulcers in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci. Apr-Jun 2000;169(2):110-2. [Medline].

  2. Perrotto J, Glick B. Lower extremity malignancies masquerading as ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. Oct 2006;52(10):46-52. [Medline].

  3. Labropoulos N, Manalo D, Patel NP, et al. Uncommon leg ulcers in the lower extremity. J Vasc Surg. Mar 2007;45(3):568-573. [Medline].

  4. Yucel EK, Dumoulin CL, Waltman AC. MR angiography of lower-extremity arterial disease: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. May-Jun 1992;2(3):303-9. [Medline].

  5. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med. Jun 11 1992;326(24):1577-81. [Medline].

  6. Neglén P, Raju S. A rational approach to detection of significant reflux with duplex Doppler scanning and air plethysmography. J Vasc Surg. Mar 1993;17(3):590-5. [Medline].

  7. van Gent WB, Hop WC, van Praag MC, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. Sep 2006;44(3):563-71. [Medline].

  8. Edlich RF, Rogers W, Kasper G, et al. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. I. Optimal time for closure of contaminated open wounds. II. Comparison of resistance to infection of open and closed wounds during healing. Am J Surg. Mar 1969;117(3):323-9. [Medline].

  9. Kavros SJ, Miller JL, Hanna SW. Treatment of ischemic wounds with noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound: the Mayo clinic experience, 2004-2006. Adv Skin Wound Care. Apr 2007;20(4):221-6. [Medline].

  10. Kalani M, Apelqvist J, Blombäck M, et al. Effect of dalteparin on healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. Sep 2003;26(9):2575-80. [Medline].

  11. Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Rohdewald P, et al. Comparison of Pycnogenol and Daflon in treating chronic venous insufficiency: a prospective, controlled study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. Apr 2006;12(2):205-12. [Medline].

  12. Gohel MS, Barwell JR, Taylor M, et al. Long term results of compression therapy alone versus compression plus surgery in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR): randomised controlled trial. BMJ. July 2007;335:7610. [Medline].

  13. Colen LB. Limb salvage in the patient with severe peripheral vascular disease: the role of microsurgical free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1987;79(3):389-95. [Medline].

  14. Ciresi KF, Anthony JP, Hoffman WY, et al. Limb salvage and wound coverage in patients with large ischemic ulcers: a multidisciplinary approach with revascularization and free tissue transfer. J Vasc Surg. Oct 1993;18(4):648-53; discussion 653-5. [Medline].

  15. Steffe TJ, Caffee HH. Long-term results following free tissue transfer for venous stasis ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. Aug 1998;41(2):131-7; discussion 138-9. [Medline].

  16. Kumins NH, Weinzweig N, Schuler JJ. Free tissue transfer provides durable treatment for large nonhealing venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg. Nov 2000;32(5):848-54. [Medline].

  17. Weinzweig N, Schuler J. Free tissue transfer in treatment of the recalcitrant chronic venous ulcer. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 1997;38(6):611-9. [Medline].

  18. Colen L, Musson A. Preoperative assessment of the peripheral vascular disease patient for free tissue transfers. J Reconstr Microsurg. Oct 1987;4(1):1-14. [Medline].

  19. Rieck B, Mailander P, Machens HG. Vascular complications after free tissue transfer. Microsurgery. 1995;16(6):400-3. [Medline].

  20. Yajima H, Tamai S, Mizumoto S, et al. Vascular complications of vascularized composite tissue transfer: outcome and salvage techniques. Microsurgery. 1993;14(8):473-8. [Medline].

  21. Lepantalo M, Tukiainen E. Combined vascular reconstruction and microvascular muscle flap transfer for salvage of ischaemic legs with major tissue loss and wound complications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. Jul 1996;12(1):65-9. [Medline].

  22. Browse NL. The pathogenesis of venous ulceration: a hypothesis. J Vasc Surg. Mar 1988;7(3):468-72. [Medline].

  23. Christensen KS, Klarke M. Transcutaneous oxygen measurement in peripheral occlusive disease. An indicator of wound healing in leg amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1986;68(3):423-6. [Medline].

  24. Gomes AS. Principles of angiography and interventional radiology. In: Moore WS, ed. Vascular Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1991:198-236.

  25. Hertz SM, Baum RA, Owen RS, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and contrast arteriography in peripheral arterial stenosis. Am J Surg. Aug 1993;166(2):112-6; discussion 116. [Medline].

  26. Johnson M. The prevalence of leg ulcers in older people: implications for community nursing. Public Health Nurs. Aug 1995;12(4):269-75. [Medline].

  27. Kucan JO, Robson MC, Heggers JP, et al. Comparison of silver sulfadiazine, povidone-iodine and physiologic saline in the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc. May 1981;29(5):232-5. [Medline].

  28. Margolis DJ, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Risk factors associated with the failure of a venous leg ulcer to heal. Arch Dermatol. Aug 1999;135(8):920-6. [Medline].

  29. Marklund B, Sulau T, Lindholm C. Prevalence of non-healed and healed chronic leg ulcers in an elderly rural population. Scand J Prim Health Care. Mar 2000;18(1):58-60. [Medline].

  30. Monstrey SJ, Ramasastry SS, Mullick PC. Leg ulcers. In: Cohen M. Mastery of Plastic and Reconstuctive Surgery. 1st. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1994.

  31. Moore WS, Henry RE, Malone JM, et al. Prospective use of xenon Xe 133 clearance for amputation level selection. Arch Surg. Jan 1981;116(1):86-8. [Medline].

  32. Mustoe TA, Cutler NR, Allman RM, et al. A phase II study to evaluate recombinant platelet-derived growth factor- BB in the treatment of stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers. Arch Surg. Feb 1994;129(2):213-9. [Medline].

  33. Neglen P, Raju S. A comparison between descending phlebography and duplex Doppler investigation in the evaluation of reflux in chronic venous insufficiency: a challenge to phlebography as the "gold standard". J Vasc Surg. Nov 1992;16(5):687-93. [Medline].

  34. Olivencia JA. Pathophysiology of venous ulcers: surgical implications, review, and update. Dermatol Surg. Nov 1999;25(11):880-5. [Medline].

  35. Pierce GF, Tarpley JE, Yanagihara D, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor (BB homodimer), transforming growth factor-beta 1, and basic fibroblast growth factor in dermal wound healing. Neovessel and matrix formation and cessation of repair. Am J Pathol. Jun 1992;140(6):1375-88. [Medline].

  36. Pinzur MS, Sage R, Stuck R, et al. Transcutaneous oxygen as a predictor of wound healing in amputations of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle. Jun 1992;13(5):271-2. [Medline].

  37. Richard JL, Parer-Richard C, Daures JP, et al. Effect of topical basic fibroblast growth factor on the healing of chronic diabetic neuropathic ulcer of the foot. A pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. Jan 1995;18(1):64-9. [Medline].

  38. Rutherford RB. Vascular Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1995.

  39. Smith WJ, Jacobs RL, Fuchs MD. Salvage of the diabetic foot with exposed os calcis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov 1993;71-7. [Medline].

  40. Wipke-Tevis DD, Rantz MJ, Mehr DR, et al. Prevalence, incidence, management, and predictors of venous ulcers in the long-term-care population using the MDS. Adv Skin Wound Care. Sep-Oct 2000;13(5):218-24. [Medline].

  41. Wipke-Tevis DD, Sae-Sia W. Caring for vascular leg ulcers. Home Healthc Nurse. Apr 2004;22(4):237-47; quiz 248-9. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

vascular disease, vascular diseases, vascular ulcer, leg ulcer, vascular legs, venous ulcer, diabetic ulcer, ischemic ulcer, vascular peripheral, foot ulcer, neurotrophic ulcer, vein ulcer, vascular surgery, arterial vascular, vascular diabetes, ulcer treatment, peripheral vascular disease, nonhealing ulcer, chronic ulcer, non-healing ulcer, hypertension, atherosclerosis, vasculitides, Buerger disease, thromboangiitis obliterans, Takayasu disease, Takayasu arteritis, leg ulceration, venous ulceration, ischemic ulceration, vein ulceration, chronic ulceration, arterial ulcer, neurotrophic ulcer, venous ulcer, stasis ulcer

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Allen Gabriel, MD, Director of Research, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Allen Gabriel, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Medical Association, and California Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Matthew C Camp, MD, Resident Surgeon, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Christian Paletta, MD, FACS, Professor, Division Chief and Program Director, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine
Christian Paletta, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American Cleft Palate/Craniofacial Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Missouri State Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Brandon Massey, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Louis University School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Albert E Cram, MD, FACS, Professor Emeritus, Departments of Surgery, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Iowa City Plastic Surgery
Albert E Cram, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Tissue Banks, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Heart Association, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and American Society of Plastic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Wayne Stadelmann, MD, Stadelmann Plastic Surgery, PC
Wayne Stadelmann, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, New Hampshire Medical Society, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center
Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Colorado Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Subhas Gupta, MD, PhD, CM, FRCS(C), FACS, Professor of Surgery, Chair, Department of Plastic Surgery, Director of Plastic Surgery Residency, Director of Comprehensive Wound Service, Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine
Subhas Gupta, MD, PhD, CM, FRCS(C), FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Phlebology, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Medical Informatics Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, California Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Medical Association, Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Quebec Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, and Wound Healing Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.