eMedicine Specialties > Dermatology > Allergy & Immunology

Fixed Drug Eruptions

Author: David F Butler, MD, Professor of Dermatology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine; Director, Division of Dermatology, Scott and White Clinic; Director Dermatology Residency Training Program, Scott and White Clinic
Coauthor(s): Jordan R Ilse, MD, Staff Physician, Scott and White Internal Medicine Residency Program, Temple, Texas
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 15, 2007

Introduction

Background

Adverse reactions to medications are common and often manifest as a cutaneous eruption.

Drug-induced cutaneous disorders frequently display a characteristic clinical morphology such as morbilliform exanthem, urticaria, hypersensitivity syndrome, pseudolymphoma, photosensitivity, pigmentary changes, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, lichenoid dermatitis, vasculitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or fixed drug eruption (FDE). The term FDE describes the development of one or more annular or oval erythematous patches as a result of systemic exposure to a drug; these reactions normally resolve with hyperpigmentation and may recur at the same site with reexposure to the drug. Repeated exposure to the offending drug may cause new lesions to develop in addition to “lighting up” the older hyperpigmented lesions. 

Several variants of FDE have been described, based on their clinical features and the distribution of the lesions.1,2,3 These include the following:

  • Pigmenting FDE
  • Generalized or multiple FDE
  • Linear FDE
  • Wandering FDE
  • Nonpigmenting FDE
  • Bullous FDE
  • Eczematous FDE
  • Urticarial FDE
  • Erythema dyschromicum perstans–like FDE

Pathophysiology

Although the exact mechanism is unknown, recent research suggests a cell-mediated process that initiates both the active and quiescent lesions. The process may involve an antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxic response.4

The offending drug is thought to function as a hapten that preferentially binds to basal keratinocytes, leading to an inflammatory response.5 Through liberation of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, keratinocytes may locally up-regulate expression of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1).6 The up-regulated ICAM1 has been shown to help T cells (CD4 and CD8) migrate to the site of an insult.7,8 The newly arriving and residential CD8 cells likely perpetuate tissue damage by their production of the inflammatory cytokines interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. CD8 cells isolated from active lesions have also been shown to express alpha E beta 7, a ligand for E-cadherin, which may further contribute to the lymphocyte’s ability to localize to the epidermis. Other cell surface molecules, such as CLA/alpha4Beta1/CD4a, that bind E-selectin/vascular cellular adhesion molecule-2/ICAM1 help to further attract CD8 cells to the area.4  

Changes in cell surface markers allow vascular endothelium to select CD4 cells for migration into active lesions. These regulatory CD4 cells likely produce interleukin 10, which has been shown to help suppress immune function, resulting in a resting lesion.4 As the inflammatory response dissipates, interleukin 15 expression from keratinocytes is thought to help ensure the survival of CD8 cells, helping them fulfill their effector memory phenotypes. Thus, when reexposure to the drug occurs, a more rapid response develops in the exact location of any prior lesions.4

Frequency

United States

The prevalence of drug eruptions has been reported to range from 2-5% for inpatients and greater than 1% for outpatients.9 FDEs may account for as much as 16-21% of all cutaneous drug eruptions. The actual frequency may be higher than current estimates, owing to  the availability of a variety of over-the-counter medications and nutritional supplements that are known to elicit FDEs.

International

The international prevalence is variable but is likely similar to that in the United States. Most studies report FDEs to be the second or third most common skin manifestation of adverse drug events.10  

Mortality/Morbidity

No deaths have been attributed to FDEs. Widespread lesions may initially mimic toxic epidermal necrolysis, but they have a benign clinical course.11 Localized hyperpigmentation is a common complication, but pain, infection, and, rarely, hypopigmentation, also may occur.1  

Race

FDEs have no known racial predilection. A genetic susceptibility to developing an FDE with an increased incidence of HLA-B22 is possible.12,13

Sex

One large study of 450 patients revealed a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1.1

Age

FDEs have been reported in patients as young as 1.5 years and as old as 87 years. The mean age at presentation is 30.4 years in males and 31.3 years in females.1

Clinical

History

The initial eruption is often solitary and located on the sacral region, hip, proximal extremity, lip/perioral region, or genitalia. With the initial FDE attack, a delay of up to 2 weeks may occur from the initial exposure to the drug to the development of the skin lesion.14 Skin lesions develop over a period of hours but require days to become necrotic. Lesions may persist from days to weeks and then fade slowly to residual oval hyperpigmented patches.

Subsequent reexposure to the medication results in a reactivation of the site, with inflammation occurring within 30 minutes to 16 hours.15 The reactivation of old lesions also may be associated with the development of new lesions at other sites.

Patients may not be cognizant that a drug, nutritional supplement, or over-the-counter medication triggered the skin problem. They may be convinced that an insect, particularly a spider, may be the culprit. A careful history is required to elicit the fact that a drug has been taken and is temporally related to the onset of the eruption. Medications taken episodically, such as pain relievers, antibiotics, or laxatives, are often to blame. When able to be identified, patients often report ingestion of one the following types of medications16 :

  • Analgesics
  • Muscle relaxants
  • Sedatives
  • Anticonvulsants
  • Antibiotics
Local symptoms may include pruritus, burning, and pain.1 Systemic symptoms are uncommon, but fever, malaise, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, anorexia, and dysuria have been reported.15,16

Further questioning may reveal prior episodes of FDE, atopic disease, or other past drug reactions. Family history may render a history of atopy, drug reactions, or diabetes mellitus.1

Physical

The most common clinical manifestation is the pigmenting FDE, which usually manifests as round or oval, sharply demarcated erythematous/edematous plaques located on the lip, hip, sacrum, or genitalia.2  These erythematous patches or plaques gradually fade with residual hyperpigmentation (see Media Files 1-5). The center of the patch may blister or become necrotic. Other less common variants may manifest as lesions resembling erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis, eczema, urticaria, a linear pattern following Blaschko lines, bullous lesions, a migrating eruption, or a nonpigmenting form with no postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.3

Initially, a single lesion or a few lesions develop, but, with reexposure, additional lesions occur. The vast majority of patients present with 1-30 lesions, ranging in size of 0.5-5 cm, but reports of lesions greater than 10 cm have been published. Lesions may be generalized. The most common reported site is the lips, and these may be seen in up to half of all cases.1

Medications may also follow a site-specific eruption pattern. For example, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim) has been shown to favor the genital region (especially in males) and naproxen and the oxicams involve the lips.2

Resting/inactive lesions tend to appear as round or oval, gray, hyperpigmented macules. 

Upon reexposure, the resting hyperpigmented macules activate, developing a violaceous center encircled by concentric rings of erythema. Re-administration of the medication poses the risk of increased pigmentation, size, and number of lesions.
 
Individuals with darker pigmentation may develop postinflammatory hypopigmented macules once the lesions have resolved.5

Causes

The major categories of causative agents of FDE include antibiotics, antiepileptics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and phenothiazines, although numerous other agents and certain foods have also been reported as causative agents. Ingestion of the causative agent may occur via any route, including oral, rectal, or intravenous.16
 
The most common cause is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.3  Other substances implicated to cause FDEs are as follows1,5,16 :

Open table in new window

Table
AcetaminophenAcyclovirAllopurinolAllylisopropyl-acetylureaAmlexanox
AmoxicillinAmpicillinAnticonvulsantsArticaineAspirin
AtenololBarbituratesBotulinum toxinCarbamazepineCelecoxib
CetirizineChloral hydrateChlordiazepoxideChlorhexidineChlormezanone
Chlorphenesin carbonateCiticolineClarithromycinClioquinolCodeine
ColchicinesCyclizineCyproterone acetateDextromethorphanDimenhydrinate
DiphenhydramineDipyroneDocetaxelEperisone hydrochlorideErythromycin
EthenzamideFeprazoneFluconazoleFluoroquinolonesFoscarnet
GriseofulvinHydroxyzineIbuprofenInterferonIomeprol
KakkonKetoconazoleLactoseLamotrigineLentils
LomeprolLopamidolnLoratadineLormetazepamMagnesium trisilicate
Mefenamic acidMelatoninMethaqualoneMetramizoleMetronidazole
MetaformMinocyclineMultivitaminsNaproxenNimesulide
OmeprazoleOndansetronOpium alkaloidsOxyphenbutazonePaclitaxel
PamabromPapaverinePara-aminosalicylic acidPenicillinsPhenazone
PhenolphthaleinPhenylbutazonePhenylpropanolaminePhenytoinPipemidic acid
PiroxicamProcarbazineProchlorperazinePseudoephedrineQuinine
RifampinScopoliaSodium benzoateStrawberriesSulfamethoxazole
TartrazineTerbinafineTetracyclinesTheophyllineThiacetazone
TiclopidineTinidazoleTolfenamic acidTosufloxacinTranexamic acid
TrimethoprimTropisetron
AcetaminophenAcyclovirAllopurinolAllylisopropyl-acetylureaAmlexanox
AmoxicillinAmpicillinAnticonvulsantsArticaineAspirin
AtenololBarbituratesBotulinum toxinCarbamazepineCelecoxib
CetirizineChloral hydrateChlordiazepoxideChlorhexidineChlormezanone
Chlorphenesin carbonateCiticolineClarithromycinClioquinolCodeine
ColchicinesCyclizineCyproterone acetateDextromethorphanDimenhydrinate
DiphenhydramineDipyroneDocetaxelEperisone hydrochlorideErythromycin
EthenzamideFeprazoneFluconazoleFluoroquinolonesFoscarnet
GriseofulvinHydroxyzineIbuprofenInterferonIomeprol
KakkonKetoconazoleLactoseLamotrigineLentils
LomeprolLopamidolnLoratadineLormetazepamMagnesium trisilicate
Mefenamic acidMelatoninMethaqualoneMetramizoleMetronidazole
MetaformMinocyclineMultivitaminsNaproxenNimesulide
OmeprazoleOndansetronOpium alkaloidsOxyphenbutazonePaclitaxel
PamabromPapaverinePara-aminosalicylic acidPenicillinsPhenazone
PhenolphthaleinPhenylbutazonePhenylpropanolaminePhenytoinPipemidic acid
PiroxicamProcarbazineProchlorperazinePseudoephedrineQuinine
RifampinScopoliaSodium benzoateStrawberriesSulfamethoxazole
TartrazineTerbinafineTetracyclinesTheophyllineThiacetazone
TiclopidineTinidazoleTolfenamic acidTosufloxacinTranexamic acid
TrimethoprimTropisetron


More on Fixed Drug Eruptions

Overview: Fixed Drug Eruptions
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Fixed Drug Eruptions
Treatment & Medication: Fixed Drug Eruptions
Follow-up: Fixed Drug Eruptions
Multimedia: Fixed Drug Eruptions
References

References

  1. Mahboob A, Haroon TS. Drugs causing fixed eruptions: a study of 450 cases. Int J Dermatol. Nov 1998;37(11):833-8. [Medline].

  2. Ozkaya-Bayazit E. Specific site involvement in fixed drug eruption. J Am Acad Dermatol. Dec 2003;49(6):1003-7. [Medline].

  3. Ozkaya-Bayazit E, Bayazit H, Ozarmagan G. Drug related clinical pattern in fixed drug eruption. Eur J Dermatol. Jun 2000;10(4):288-91. [Medline].

  4. Teraki Y, Shiohara T. IFN-gamma-producing effector CD8+ T cells and IL-10-producing regulatory CD4+ T cells in fixed drug eruption. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Sep 2003;112(3):609-15. [Medline].

  5. Weedon D. The lichenoid reaction pattern ('interface dermatitis'). In: Skin Pathology. 2nd ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:42-43.

  6. Smoller BR, Luster AD, Krane JF, Krueger J, Gray MH, McNutt NS, et al. Fixed drug eruptions: evidence for a cytokine-mediated process. J Cutan Pathol. Feb 1991;18(1):13-9. [Medline].

  7. Hindsén M, Christensen OB, Gruic V, Löfberg H. Fixed drug eruption: an immunohistochemical investigation of the acute and healing phase. Br J Dermatol. Mar 1987;116(3):351-60. [Medline].

  8. Shiohara T, Nickoloff BJ, Sagawa Y, Gomi T, Nagashima M. Fixed drug eruption. Expression of epidermal keratinocyte intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Arch Dermatol. Oct 1989;125(10):1371-6. [Medline].

  9. Krähenbühl-Melcher A, Schlienger R, Lampert M, Haschke M, Drewe J, Krähenbühl S. Drug-related problems in hospitals : a review of the recent literature. Drug Saf. 2007;30(5):379-407. [Medline].

  10. Lee AY. Fixed drug eruptions. Incidence, recognition, and avoidance. Am J Clin Dermatol. Sep-Oct 2000;1(5):277-85. [Medline].

  11. Baird BJ, De Villez RL. Widespread bullous fixed drug eruption mimicking toxic epidermal necrolysis. Int J Dermatol. Apr 1988;27(3):170-4. [Medline].

  12. Pellicano R, Ciavarella G, Lomuto M, Di Giorgio G. Genetic susceptibility to fixed drug eruption: evidence for a link with HLA-B22. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 1994;30(1):52-4. [Medline].

  13. Pellicano R, Lomuto M, Ciavarella G, Di Giorgio G, Gasparini P. Fixed drug eruptions with feprazone are linked to HLA-B22. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1997;36(5 Pt 1):782-4. [Medline].

  14. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP. Fixed drug eruptions. In: Dermatology. London, England: Mosby; 2003:344-5.

  15. Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI. Fixed drug eruptions. In: Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2003:1333.

  16. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G. Fixed drug eruption (FDE): changing scenario of incriminating drugs. Int J Dermatol. Aug 2006;45(8):897-908. [Medline].

  17. Lammintausta K, Kortekangas-Savolainen O. Oral challenge in patients with suspected cutaneous adverse drug reactions: findings in 784 patients during a 25-year-period. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(6):491-6. [Medline].

  18. Lammintausta K, Kortekangas-Savolainen O. The usefulness of skin tests to prove drug hypersensitivity. Br J Dermatol. May 2005;152(5):968-74. [Medline].

  19. Zedlitz S, Linzbach L, Kaufmann R, Boehncke WH. Reproducible identification of the causative drug of a fixed drug eruption by oral provocation and lesional patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. Jun 2002;46(6):352-3. [Medline].

  20. Kelso JM, Keating RM. Successful desensitization for treatment of a fixed drug eruption to allopurinol. J Allergy Clin Immunol. May 1996;97(5):1171-2. [Medline].

  21. Zawar V, Kirloskar M, Chuh A. Fixed drug eruption - a sexually inducible reaction?. Int J STD AIDS. Aug 2004;15(8):560-3. [Medline].

  22. Tornero P, De Barrio M, Baeza ML, Herrero T. Cross-reactivity among p-amino group compounds in sulfonamide fixed drug eruption: diagnostic value of patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. Aug 2004;51(2):57-62. [Medline].

  23. Gonzalo-Garijo MA, de Argila D, Rodríguez-Nevado I. Generalized reaction after patch testing with metamizol. Contact Dermatitis. Sep 2001;45(3):180. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

fixed drug reaction, FDE, adverse drug reaction, adverse cutaneous drug reaction, drug-induced hypersensitivity, drug-induced pigmentation, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

David F Butler, MD, Professor of Dermatology, Texas A&M University College of Medicine; Director, Division of Dermatology, Scott and White Clinic; Director Dermatology Residency Training Program, Scott and White Clinic
David F Butler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American Medical Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for MOHS Surgery, Association of Military Dermatologists, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jordan R Ilse, MD, Staff Physician, Scott and White Internal Medicine Residency Program, Temple, Texas
Jordan R Ilse, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Medical Association and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH, Professor and Head of Dermatology, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Pediatrics, Professor of Pathology, Professor of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School
Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Richard P Vinson, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech University School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Mountain View Dermatology, PA
Richard P Vinson, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Association of Military Dermatologists, Texas Dermatological Society, and Texas Medical Association
Disclosure: none None None

Managing Editor

Jeffrey P Callen, MD, Professor of Medicine, Chief, Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville School of Medicine
Jeffrey P Callen, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, and American College of Rheumatology
Disclosure: Amgen Honoraria Consulting; Abbott Honoraria Consulting; Electrical Optical Sciences Honoraria Consulting; Centocor Honoraria Consulting

CME Editor

Catherine Quirk, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Brown University
Catherine Quirk, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American Academy of Dermatology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

William D James, MD, Paul R Gross Professor of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Vice-Chair, Program Director, Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Health System
William D James, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology and Society for Investigative Dermatology
Disclosure: elsevier Royalty Other

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.