Background
Fibular development and its impact on the kinematics of the ankle and foot are complex topics.[1, 2, 3] The normal fibula is approximately equal in length to the tibia, but its distal tip extends more caudad. Thus, the fibula acts as a lateral buttress, bearing approximately 15% of the body weight during gait (see Image below). Ankle valgus is an insidious deformity that results in pronation of the foot and medial malleolar prominence. The causes are varied and include neuromuscular disorders, skeletal dysplasias, and clubfeet.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Left untreated, this deformity may progress, despite the use of orthotics or corrective shoes, resulting in the medial collapse of the ankle and foot. After skeletal maturity, the only remedy is to perform a supramalleolar osteotomy. However, in growing children, there is the opportunity to intervene by means of guided growth or hemi-epiphysiodesis of the distal medial
tibia.
Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87º, and the fibular physis is at or distal to the level of the plafond, which is horizontal and, thus, perpendicular to gravity. (Click Image to enlarge.)Related eMedicine topics:
History Of The Procedure
The focus of this article is to discuss the pathophysiology and evolution of ankle valgus and elucidate the role of guided growth (prior to skeletal maturity) to reverse this problem, without the need for osteotomy. If the physis has closed, an osteotomy will be required.
Problem
In the normally aligned extremity, the mechanical axis bisects the knee and ankle, at an angle of 3º with respect to the vertical (gravity). The physes of the tibia and fibula, along with the ankle plafond, are parallel to the floor and perpendicular to gravity. This permits the physeal and articular cartilage chondrocytes to resist compression—a task that they are well suited for—while sparing them from shear forces.
Malhotra classified progressive ankle valgus, which is directly proportional to the degree of fibular physis elevation (stage 0 = normal). The described triad of fibular physis elevation, wedging of the lateral tibial epiphysis, and ankle tilt may be accompanied by horizontal expansion of the fibular epiphysis (impingement), medial clear space widening, and avulsion injuries of the tip of the medial malleolus. (Click Image to enlarge.)Malhotra devised a grading system that is applicable to children older than 2 years (see Image above).[8] With reference to children with spina bifida, he discussed the following triad of findings:
- Proximal migration of the fibular physis
- Lateral wedging of the distal tibial epiphysis
- Lateral tilt of the talus
The wedging of the lateral distal tibial epiphysis progresses as the stages increase. The situation is compounded by lateral shift of the ground reaction forces. In addition to the triad, one may observe widening of the distal fibular epiphysis consistent with lateral shift of the ground reaction forces, increased fibular weight-bearing and impingement on the talus-calcaneus laterally. In some cases, there is also widening of the medial clear space of the ankle and an obvious “os subtibiale.”
Epidemiology
Frequency
Depending on the etiology, ankle valgus is often bilateral; its overall frequency is unknown. It is far more common than ankle varus and may accompany (or mimic) hindfoot deformities, compounding their management. Developing during childhood, if left untreated, it may become relatively disabling by the time of skeletal maturity.
Etiology
Ankle valgus, which is rare at birth, may gradually develop because of a variety of conditions, including the following (but not limited to these)[7, 8, 9, 10, 11] :
- Cerebral palsy
- Spina bifida
- Arthrogryposis
- Down syndrome
- Congenital clubfoot[12]
- Neurofibromatosis
- Hereditary multiple exostoses
- Postaxial hypoplasia
- Skeletal dysplasia
- Posttraumatic events
- Ball-and-socket ankle[13]
All told, ankle valgus is considerably more common than (bony) ankle varus. Often bilateral, it may be seen in conjunction with other limb malalignment problems, including subtalar valgus (or varus) and genu valgum. When unilateral, it may contribute to relative foreshortening of the limb due to lateral tilt and translocation of the hindfoot. This will not be appreciated on a scanogram; a standing AP radiograph of the ankles is necessary to document its contribution.[14, 15]
Pathophysiology
Normally, the tip of the fibula is caudad to the medial malleolus, and the fibula serves as a lateral buttress to the ankle, bearing up to 15% of the weight. This preserves a horizontal plafond and ameliorates strain on the deltoid and tibiofibular ligaments.
If the fibula is foreshortened because of developmental, posttraumatic, or iatrogenic causes, the lateral buttress effect is lost. As the ankle tilts and the ground reaction force shifts laterally, the balance changes. The deltoid and interosseous ligaments are subject to strain, and the lateral distal tibial epiphysis is compressed, resulting in characteristic wedging. The distal fibular epiphysis may enlarge, reflecting the Heuter-Volkmann principle as it impinges on the hindfoot and assumes increased weight-bearing stresses (see Image below). This continues in a vicious cycle that is refractory to shoe modification or bracing; eventually, surgical intervention is needed. Ankle valgus may also contribute to progressive outward rotation of the tibia and result in secondary valgus strain on the knee.
Lateral impingement may be due to ankle valgus, hindfoot valgus, or both. This is an extreme example. (Click Image to enlarge.)Presentation
In the standing position, the medial malleolus is unduly prominent, and the heel and hindfoot are angled laterally, relative to the calf (see top Image below). A common finding is subfibular tenderness due to impingement. There may be concomitant hindfoot deformity, more commonly planovalgus than cavovarus. Proximally, there may be concomitant genu valgum with a corresponding increase in the intermalleolar distance (see bottom Image below). When the etiology is neuromuscular, the patient may have muscle weakness, imbalance, or contractures.
One needs to differentiate between ankle valgus (shown here) and hindfoot valgus. It is imperative to obtain a standing AP radiograph of the ankle when evaluating foot problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Patients may have valgus at more than just the hindfoot and ankle. This boy with congenital clubfeet has genu valgum compounding his gait problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)Indications
The indications for treatment of ankle valgus are the presence of related discomfort, excessive shoe wear, and documented progression.
- Bracing: While one may temporize and treat mild deformities with lateral heel wedges, or orthoses of varying designs, the underlying growth disturbance will persist and, likely, will progress. As the child grows and gains body mass, these measures will eventually prove inadequate.
- Osteotomy: One surgical option is to perform a supramalleolar osteotomy. Considering the deformities are often bilateral, the patient will need to be immobilized and non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks. For deformities less than 20 º, a closing wedge osteotomy, leaving the fibula intact, is relatively simple and well tolerated. When the deformity is more than 20 º, it is necessary to cut the fibula and translocate the distal tibia-fibula to restore the mechanical axis. This requires more fixation and carries higher risks.
Unfortunately, depending on the age and etiology, recurrent ankle valgus is common with further growth, and the procedure(s) may need to be repeated.
- Guided growth: As an alternative, guided growth, to redirect the distal tibial physis, is a good option for patients of virtually any age, regardless of the etiology. (See Images below.) A transmalleolar screw or an 8-plate (Orthofix, McKinney, Texas) is necessary. The screw is economical and simple to insert; however, there may be major challenges when it comes time to remove the implant. The 8-plate offers some advantages: It is simple to apply; the flexible tension band offers a fulcrum that is medial to the physis; the correction is more rapid; and the 8-plate is simpler to remove.[16]
Transmalleolar screws, though easy to insert, may be difficult to remove. Shown here are 2 complications: screw breakage and intra-articular migration of the screw head, reflecting the drawbacks of imposing a rigid restraint on a dynamic and growing physis.
This patient (see also Image below) failed to return for follow-up for 24 months following medial malleolar epiphysiodeses. There is obvious iatrogenic varus with tenting of the physes and risk of premature closure. (Click Image to enlarge.)
These screws were removed (with difficulty) on an urgent basis (see also Image above).
Relevant Anatomy
Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87º, and the fibular physis is at or distal to the level of the plafond, which is horizontal and, thus, perpendicular to gravity. (Click Image to enlarge.)Normal
- Horizontal plafond
- Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87 º
- Rectangular-shaped distal tibial epiphysis
- Fibular tip caudal to medial malleolus
- Fibular physis at or below level of the tibial plafond (Malhotra stage 0)
- Medial clear space = superior clear space
- Tibiofibular syndesmosis not widened
Ankle valgus
- Plafond tilted laterally
- Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) < 87 º
- Triangular-shaped tibial epiphysis with wedging
- Fibular tip elevated; distal epiphysis broadened
- Fibular physis above plafond (Malhotra stage I, II, or III)
- Medial clear space widened with or without os subtibiale
- Tibiofibular syndesmosis may be widened (HME)
Contraindications
There are no contraindications to the surgical correction of ankle valgus. If the physis is closed an osteotomy is required; if it is open, guided growth is preferred in most circumstances.
Lewin SO, Opitz JM. Fibular a/hypoplasia: review and documentation of the fibular developmental field. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;2:215-38. [Medline].
Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;233:1-24. [Medline].
Tickle C. Genetics and limb development. Dev Genet. 1996;19(1):1-8. [Medline].
Cuervo M, Albiñana J, Cebrian J, Juarez C. Congenital hypoplasia of the fibula: clinical manifestations. J Pediatr Orthop B. Winter 1996;5(1):35-8. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Arms D. Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 2000;20(2):166-72. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Aoki S, Olson P. Ball-and-socket ankle. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 2006;26(4):427-31. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Otis S. Ankle valgus and clubfeet. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1999;19(4):515-7. [Medline].
Malhotra D, Puri R, Owen R. Valgus deformity of the ankle in children with spina bifida aperta. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1984;66(3):381-5. [Medline].
Lampasi M, Antonioli D, Di Gennaro GL, Magnani M, Donzelli O. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula and valgus deformity of the ankle in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B. Nov 2008;17(6):315-21. [Medline].
Takikawa K, Haga N, Tanaka H, Okada K. Characteristic factors of ankle valgus with multiple cartilaginous exostoses. J Pediatr Orthop. Oct-Nov 2008;28(7):761-5. [Medline].
Gibson V, Prieskorn D. The valgus ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. Mar 2007;12(1):15-27. [Medline].
Nabeshima Y, Mori H, Fujii H, Ozaki A, Mitani M, Fujioka H. Ankle valgus and subtalar varus in treated clubfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Nov-Dec 2009;48(6):615-9. [Medline].
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Development of the ball-and-socket ankle as assessed by radiography and arthrography. A long-term follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1999;81(6):1001-4. [Medline].
Machen MS, Stevens PM. Should full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs replace the scanogram for measurement of limb length discrepancy?. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jan 2005;14(1):30-7. [Medline].
Stevens PM. Effect of ankle valgus on radiographic appearance of the hindfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1988;8(2):184-6. [Medline].
Aurégan JC, Finidori G, Cadilhac C, Pannier S, Padovani JP, Glorion C. Children ankle valgus deformity treatment using a transphyseal medial malleolar screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. Jun 2011;97(4):406-9. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Toomey E. Fibular-Achilles tenodesis for paralytic ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1988;8(2):169-75. [Medline].
Hou ZH, Zhou JH, Ye H, Shi JG, Zheng LB, Yao J, et al. Influence of distal tibiofibular synostosis on ankle function. Chin J Traumatol. Apr 2009;12(2):104-6. [Medline].
Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
Stevens PM, Klatt JB. Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep 2008;28(6):632-9. [Medline].
Stevens PM, Belle RM. Screw epiphysiodesis for ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 1997;17(1):9-12. [Medline].

