Pediatric Ankle Valgus 

  • Author: Peter M Stevens, MD; Chief Editor: Dennis P Grogan, MD   more...
 
Updated: Nov 21, 2011
 

Background

Fibular development and its impact on the kinematics of the ankle and foot are complex topics.[1, 2, 3] The normal fibula is approximately equal in length to the tibia, but its distal tip extends more caudad. Thus, the fibula acts as a lateral buttress, bearing approximately 15% of the body weight during gait (see Image below). Ankle valgus is an insidious deformity that results in pronation of the foot and medial malleolar prominence. The causes are varied and include neuromuscular disorders, skeletal dysplasias, and clubfeet.[4, 5, 6, 7, 8] Left untreated, this deformity may progress, despite the use of orthotics or corrective shoes, resulting in the medial collapse of the ankle and foot. After skeletal maturity, the only remedy is to perform a supramalleolar osteotomy. However, in growing children, there is the opportunity to intervene by means of guided growth or hemi-epiphysiodesis of the distal medial

tibia.

Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87º, and the fibular physis is at or distal to the level of the plafond, which is horizontal and, thus, perpendicular to gravity. (Click Image to enlarge.)

Related eMedicine topics:

Ankle Arthroscopy

Clubfoot

Skeletal Dysplasia

Next

History Of The Procedure

The focus of this article is to discuss the pathophysiology and evolution of ankle valgus and elucidate the role of guided growth (prior to skeletal maturity) to reverse this problem, without the need for osteotomy. If the physis has closed, an osteotomy will be required.

Previous
Next

Problem

In the normally aligned extremity, the mechanical axis bisects the knee and ankle, at an angle of 3º with respect to the vertical (gravity). The physes of the tibia and fibula, along with the ankle plafond, are parallel to the floor and perpendicular to gravity. This permits the physeal and articular cartilage chondrocytes to resist compression—a task that they are well suited for—while sparing them from shear forces.

Malhotra classified progressive ankle valgus, whicMalhotra classified progressive ankle valgus, which is directly proportional to the degree of fibular physis elevation (stage 0 = normal). The described triad of fibular physis elevation, wedging of the lateral tibial epiphysis, and ankle tilt may be accompanied by horizontal expansion of the fibular epiphysis (impingement), medial clear space widening, and avulsion injuries of the tip of the medial malleolus. (Click Image to enlarge.)

Malhotra devised a grading system that is applicable to children older than 2 years (see Image above).[8] With reference to children with spina bifida, he discussed the following triad of findings:

  1. Proximal migration of the fibular physis
  2. Lateral wedging of the distal tibial epiphysis
  3. Lateral tilt of the talus

The wedging of the lateral distal tibial epiphysis progresses as the stages increase. The situation is compounded by lateral shift of the ground reaction forces. In addition to the triad, one may observe widening of the distal fibular epiphysis consistent with lateral shift of the ground reaction forces, increased fibular weight-bearing and impingement on the talus-calcaneus laterally. In some cases, there is also widening of the medial clear space of the ankle and an obvious “os subtibiale.”

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Depending on the etiology, ankle valgus is often bilateral; its overall frequency is unknown. It is far more common than ankle varus and may accompany (or mimic) hindfoot deformities, compounding their management. Developing during childhood, if left untreated, it may become relatively disabling by the time of skeletal maturity.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Ankle valgus, which is rare at birth, may gradually develop because of a variety of conditions, including the following (but not limited to these)[7, 8, 9, 10, 11] :

  • Cerebral palsy
  • Spina bifida
  • Arthrogryposis
  • Down syndrome
  • Congenital clubfoot[12]
  • Neurofibromatosis
  • Hereditary multiple exostoses
  • Postaxial hypoplasia
  • Skeletal dysplasia
  • Posttraumatic events
  • Ball-and-socket ankle[13]

All told, ankle valgus is considerably more common than (bony) ankle varus. Often bilateral, it may be seen in conjunction with other limb malalignment problems, including subtalar valgus (or varus) and genu valgum. When unilateral, it may contribute to relative foreshortening of the limb due to lateral tilt and translocation of the hindfoot. This will not be appreciated on a scanogram; a standing AP radiograph of the ankles is necessary to document its contribution.[14, 15]

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

Normally, the tip of the fibula is caudad to the medial malleolus, and the fibula serves as a lateral buttress to the ankle, bearing up to 15% of the weight. This preserves a horizontal plafond and ameliorates strain on the deltoid and tibiofibular ligaments.

If the fibula is foreshortened because of developmental, posttraumatic, or iatrogenic causes, the lateral buttress effect is lost. As the ankle tilts and the ground reaction force shifts laterally, the balance changes. The deltoid and interosseous ligaments are subject to strain, and the lateral distal tibial epiphysis is compressed, resulting in characteristic wedging. The distal fibular epiphysis may enlarge, reflecting the Heuter-Volkmann principle as it impinges on the hindfoot and assumes increased weight-bearing stresses (see Image below). This continues in a vicious cycle that is refractory to shoe modification or bracing; eventually, surgical intervention is needed. Ankle valgus may also contribute to progressive outward rotation of the tibia and result in secondary valgus strain on the knee.

Lateral impingement may be due to ankle valgus, hiLateral impingement may be due to ankle valgus, hindfoot valgus, or both. This is an extreme example. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Previous
Next

Presentation

In the standing position, the medial malleolus is unduly prominent, and the heel and hindfoot are angled laterally, relative to the calf (see top Image below). A common finding is subfibular tenderness due to impingement. There may be concomitant hindfoot deformity, more commonly planovalgus than cavovarus. Proximally, there may be concomitant genu valgum with a corresponding increase in the intermalleolar distance (see bottom Image below). When the etiology is neuromuscular, the patient may have muscle weakness, imbalance, or contractures.

One needs to differentiate between ankle valgus (sOne needs to differentiate between ankle valgus (shown here) and hindfoot valgus. It is imperative to obtain a standing AP radiograph of the ankle when evaluating foot problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)Patients may have valgus at more than just the hinPatients may have valgus at more than just the hindfoot and ankle. This boy with congenital clubfeet has genu valgum compounding his gait problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Previous
Next

Indications

The indications for treatment of ankle valgus are the presence of related discomfort, excessive shoe wear, and documented progression.

  • Bracing: While one may temporize and treat mild deformities with lateral heel wedges, or orthoses of varying designs, the underlying growth disturbance will persist and, likely, will progress. As the child grows and gains body mass, these measures will eventually prove inadequate.
  • Osteotomy: One surgical option is to perform a supramalleolar osteotomy. Considering the deformities are often bilateral, the patient will need to be immobilized and non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks. For deformities less than 20 º, a closing wedge osteotomy, leaving the fibula intact, is relatively simple and well tolerated. When the deformity is more than 20 º, it is necessary to cut the fibula and translocate the distal tibia-fibula to restore the mechanical axis. This requires more fixation and carries higher risks.

Unfortunately, depending on the age and etiology, recurrent ankle valgus is common with further growth, and the procedure(s) may need to be repeated.

  • Guided growth: As an alternative, guided growth, to redirect the distal tibial physis, is a good option for patients of virtually any age, regardless of the etiology. (See Images below.) A transmalleolar screw or an 8-plate (Orthofix, McKinney, Texas) is necessary. The screw is economical and simple to insert; however, there may be major challenges when it comes time to remove the implant. The 8-plate offers some advantages: It is simple to apply; the flexible tension band offers a fulcrum that is medial to the physis; the correction is more rapid; and the 8-plate is simpler to remove.[16] Transmalleolar screws, though easy to insert, may Transmalleolar screws, though easy to insert, may be difficult to remove. Shown here are 2 complications: screw breakage and intra-articular migration of the screw head, reflecting the drawbacks of imposing a rigid restraint on a dynamic and growing physis. This patient (see also Image below) failed to retuThis patient (see also Image below) failed to return for follow-up for 24 months following medial malleolar epiphysiodeses. There is obvious iatrogenic varus with tenting of the physes and risk of premature closure. (Click Image to enlarge.)These screws were removed (with difficulty) on an These screws were removed (with difficulty) on an urgent basis (see also Image above).
Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87º, and the fibular physis is at or distal to the level of the plafond, which is horizontal and, thus, perpendicular to gravity. (Click Image to enlarge.)

Normal

  • Horizontal plafond
  • Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87 º
  • Rectangular-shaped distal tibial epiphysis
  • Fibular tip caudal to medial malleolus
  • Fibular physis at or below level of the tibial plafond (Malhotra stage 0)
  • Medial clear space = superior clear space
  • Tibiofibular syndesmosis not widened

Ankle valgus

  • Plafond tilted laterally
  • Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) < 87 º
  • Triangular-shaped tibial epiphysis with wedging
  • Fibular tip elevated; distal epiphysis broadened
  • Fibular physis above plafond (Malhotra stage I, II, or III)
  • Medial clear space widened with or without os subtibiale
  • Tibiofibular syndesmosis may be widened (HME)
Previous
Next

Contraindications

There are no contraindications to the surgical correction of ankle valgus. If the physis is closed an osteotomy is required; if it is open, guided growth is preferred in most circumstances.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Peter M Stevens, MD  Professor, Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Fellowship Program, Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah School of Medicine

Peter M Stevens, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Society ASAMI-North America, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, Utah Medical Association, and Western Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Orthofix Inc Royalty Independent contractor

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Paul E Di Cesare, MD, FACS  Professor and Chair, Department of Orthopedic Sugery, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine

Paul E Di Cesare, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Stryker Consulting fee Consulting

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS  Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Dennis P Grogan, MD  Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Chief of Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa

Dennis P Grogan, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Eastern Orthopaedic Association, Irish American Orthopaedic Society, Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and Scoliosis Research Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Lewin SO, Opitz JM. Fibular a/hypoplasia: review and documentation of the fibular developmental field. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;2:215-38. [Medline].

  2. Lundberg A. Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1989;233:1-24. [Medline].

  3. Tickle C. Genetics and limb development. Dev Genet. 1996;19(1):1-8. [Medline].

  4. Cuervo M, Albiñana J, Cebrian J, Juarez C. Congenital hypoplasia of the fibula: clinical manifestations. J Pediatr Orthop B. Winter 1996;5(1):35-8. [Medline].

  5. Stevens PM, Arms D. Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 2000;20(2):166-72. [Medline].

  6. Stevens PM, Aoki S, Olson P. Ball-and-socket ankle. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 2006;26(4):427-31. [Medline].

  7. Stevens PM, Otis S. Ankle valgus and clubfeet. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul-Aug 1999;19(4):515-7. [Medline].

  8. Malhotra D, Puri R, Owen R. Valgus deformity of the ankle in children with spina bifida aperta. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1984;66(3):381-5. [Medline].

  9. Lampasi M, Antonioli D, Di Gennaro GL, Magnani M, Donzelli O. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the fibula and valgus deformity of the ankle in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B. Nov 2008;17(6):315-21. [Medline].

  10. Takikawa K, Haga N, Tanaka H, Okada K. Characteristic factors of ankle valgus with multiple cartilaginous exostoses. J Pediatr Orthop. Oct-Nov 2008;28(7):761-5. [Medline].

  11. Gibson V, Prieskorn D. The valgus ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. Mar 2007;12(1):15-27. [Medline].

  12. Nabeshima Y, Mori H, Fujii H, Ozaki A, Mitani M, Fujioka H. Ankle valgus and subtalar varus in treated clubfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. Nov-Dec 2009;48(6):615-9. [Medline].

  13. Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Development of the ball-and-socket ankle as assessed by radiography and arthrography. A long-term follow-up report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Nov 1999;81(6):1001-4. [Medline].

  14. Machen MS, Stevens PM. Should full-length standing anteroposterior radiographs replace the scanogram for measurement of limb length discrepancy?. J Pediatr Orthop B. Jan 2005;14(1):30-7. [Medline].

  15. Stevens PM. Effect of ankle valgus on radiographic appearance of the hindfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1988;8(2):184-6. [Medline].

  16. Aurégan JC, Finidori G, Cadilhac C, Pannier S, Padovani JP, Glorion C. Children ankle valgus deformity treatment using a transphyseal medial malleolar screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. Jun 2011;97(4):406-9. [Medline].

  17. Stevens PM, Toomey E. Fibular-Achilles tenodesis for paralytic ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop. Mar-Apr 1988;8(2):169-75. [Medline].

  18. Hou ZH, Zhou JH, Ye H, Shi JG, Zheng LB, Yao J, et al. Influence of distal tibiofibular synostosis on ankle function. Chin J Traumatol. Apr 2009;12(2):104-6. [Medline].

  19. Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.

  20. Stevens PM, Klatt JB. Guided growth for pathological physes: radiographic improvement during realignment. J Pediatr Orthop. Sep 2008;28(6):632-9. [Medline].

  21. Stevens PM, Belle RM. Screw epiphysiodesis for ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 1997;17(1):9-12. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Normal ankle alignment. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is 87º, and the fibular physis is at or distal to the level of the plafond, which is horizontal and, thus, perpendicular to gravity. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Malhotra classified progressive ankle valgus, which is directly proportional to the degree of fibular physis elevation (stage 0 = normal). The described triad of fibular physis elevation, wedging of the lateral tibial epiphysis, and ankle tilt may be accompanied by horizontal expansion of the fibular epiphysis (impingement), medial clear space widening, and avulsion injuries of the tip of the medial malleolus. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Lateral impingement may be due to ankle valgus, hindfoot valgus, or both. This is an extreme example. (Click Image to enlarge.)
One needs to differentiate between ankle valgus (shown here) and hindfoot valgus. It is imperative to obtain a standing AP radiograph of the ankle when evaluating foot problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Patients may have valgus at more than just the hindfoot and ankle. This boy with congenital clubfeet has genu valgum compounding his gait problems. (Click Image to enlarge.)
Transmalleolar screws, though easy to insert, may be difficult to remove. Shown here are 2 complications: screw breakage and intra-articular migration of the screw head, reflecting the drawbacks of imposing a rigid restraint on a dynamic and growing physis.
This patient (see also Image below) failed to return for follow-up for 24 months following medial malleolar epiphysiodeses. There is obvious iatrogenic varus with tenting of the physes and risk of premature closure. (Click Image to enlarge.)
These screws were removed (with difficulty) on an urgent basis (see also Image above).
This patient had asynchronous medial malleolar epiphysiodeses. The screw on the left could not be retrieved. His opening wedge osteotomy to correct iatrogenic varus collapsed into a nonunion, necessitating salvage with a Taylor spatial frame. This unfortunate sequence would not have happened with an 8-plate.
A drawback of the intraphyseal fulcrum is the rigid constraint of the physis. Correction is relatively slow and inefficient when compared to the flexible, extraphyseal 8-plate.
The nonlocking 8-plate is placed superficial to the intact periosteum. As lateral growth occurs, the screws diverge, permitting safe and gradual correction of the valgus deformity. The ground reaction force moves medially, toward the center of the ankle. The distal tibial physis can expand and grow laterally; the articular cartilage is spared from harmful shear forces.
The fibula may not respond in a synchronous manner. However, as lateral impingement is alleviated, symptoms abate and there are no functional consequences. In children, it is not necessary to lengthen the fibula or fuse it to the distal tibia.
Through a 2.5 -cm incision, one can place a Keith needle into the distal tibial physis, preserving the periosteum. Center the 8-plate on the physis, and secure it with the 4.5-mm cannulated screws (either 16 or 24 mm). Place the epiphyseal screw first, with care to avoid the ankle joint or physis.
Fluoroscopic sequence showing the steps. The 24-mm screws are preferable if there is enough space to insert them.
Sick physes are not a contraindication to medial malleolar epiphysiodesis, even with screws. Note the remodeling of the distal tibial epiphysis as the ground reaction force is restored to neutral and the plafond rendered horizontal.
Ankle valgus is relatively common in children with previously operated clubfeet. While these feet may be presumed to be overcorrected, ankle films may reveal ankle valgus and lateral impingement. If the feet are flexible, it may be preferable to deliberately overcorrect into 5º of ankle varus before removing the plates. Continue to observe the child annually until maturity, and repeat as needed.
Presenting with an anterolateral bow and initially intact fibula, this child went on to a fibular fracture/pseudarthrosis and ankle valgus by age 3 years. Note the medial widening. It is not necessary to fix, bone-graft, or lengthen the fibula, nor is it helpful to create a tibia-fibular synostosis.
The medial malleolar screw was placed at age 4 years, and over the ensuing 2 years, the valgus corrected into slight varus. This procedure was repeated at age 7 years and again at 9 years, employing the 8-plate.
This 12-year-old boy with hemiplegia underwent a rotational supramalleolar osteotomy. Despite the fibula being left intact, he drifted into valgus over the ensuing year.
This 10-year-old boy demonstrates the stigmata of hereditary multiple exostoses, with concurrent knee and ankle valgus. These deformities were managed by 8-plates applied to the distal medial femora and distal medial tibiae. The deformities corrected over the ensuing year, and the plates were then removed.
This 9-year-old patient with spina bifida had progressive and symptomatic ankle valgus. One year following 8-plate insertion, it is evident that the 16-mm screws are losing their grip. The goal was to achieve slight varus overcorrection.
In this patient (see also Image above),the plates were moved distally and resecured with 24-mm screws.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.