eMedicine Specialties > Cardiology > Myocardial Disease and Cardiomyopathies

Cardiogenic Shock

Author: Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Coauthor(s): Michael E Zevitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Finch University of the Health Sciences, The Chicago Medical School; Consulting Staff, Private Practice
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 20, 2008

Introduction

Background

Cardiogenic shock is a major, and frequently fatal, complication of a variety of acute and chronic disorders that impair the ability of the heart to maintain adequate tissue perfusion. Cardiac failure with cardiogenic shock continues to be a frustrating clinical problem; the management of this condition requires a rapid and well-organized approach.

Cardiogenic shock is a physiologic state in which inadequate tissue perfusion results from cardiac dysfunction, most commonly following acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although ST-elevation MI (STEMI, previously termed Q-wave MI) is encountered in most patients, cardiogenic shock may also develop in patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI, NSTACS, or unstable angina). The clinical definition of cardiogenic shock is decreased cardiac output and evidence of tissue hypoxia in the presence of adequate intravascular volume. Hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock are sustained hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg for at least 30 min) and a reduced cardiac index (<2.2 L/min/m2) in the presence of elevated pulmonary capillary occlusion pressure (>15 mm Hg).

The diagnosis of cardiogenic shock can sometimes be made at the bedside by observing hypotension and clinical signs of poor tissue perfusion, which include oliguria, cyanosis, cool extremities, and altered mentation. These signs usually persist after attempts have been made to correct hypovolemia, arrhythmia, hypoxia, and acidosis.

Historical aspects

MI is the most common cause of cardiogenic shock in modern times. Morgagni first recognized MI in 1761, and it was subsequently described by Caleb Parry in 1788 and by Heberden in 1802. John Hunter, a surgeon at St. George's Hospital in London, England described his personal experience with MI in 1773. Adam Hammer, a physician in Mannheim, Germany, identified the role of coronary thrombosis in the causation of MI in 1878. The clinical features of acute MI and survival of patients after such an event were reported in 1912 in the Journal of the American Medical Association by James Herrick, a Chicago physician. In the late 20th century, clinicians recognized cardiogenic shock as a low cardiac output state secondary to extensive left ventricular infarction, development of a mechanical defect (eg, ventricular septal defect or papillary muscle rupture), and right ventricular (RV) infarction.

Pathophysiology

Disorders that can result in the acute deterioration of cardiac function and can lead to cardiogenic shock include MI or myocardial ischemia, acute myocarditis, sustained arrhythmia, acute valvular catastrophe, and decompensation of end-stage cardiomyopathy from multiple etiologies. Autopsy studies show that cardiogenic shock is generally associated with the loss of more than 40% of the left ventricular myocardial muscle. The pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock, which is well understood in the setting of coronary artery disease, is described below.

Myocardial pathology

Cardiogenic shock is characterized by both systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Patients who develop cardiogenic shock from acute MI consistently have evidence of progressive myocardial necrosis with infarct extension. Decreased coronary perfusion pressure and increased myocardial oxygen demand play a role in the vicious cycle that leads to cardiogenic shock. These patients often have multivessel coronary artery disease with limited coronary blood flow reserve. Ischemia remote from the infarcted zone is an important contributor to shock. Myocardial diastolic function is also impaired because ischemia causes decreased myocardial compliance, thereby increasing left ventricular filling pressure, which may lead to pulmonary edema and hypoxemia.

Cellular pathology

Tissue hypoperfusion, with consequent cellular hypoxia, causes anaerobic glycolysis, the accumulation of lactic acid, and intracellular acidosis. Also, myocyte membrane transport pumps fail, which decreases transmembrane potential and causes intracellular accumulation of sodium and calcium, resulting in myocyte swelling. If ischemia is severe and prolonged, myocardial cellular injury becomes irreversible and leads to myonecrosis, which includes mitochondrial swelling, the accumulation of denatured proteins and chromatin, and lysosomal breakdown. These pathophysiologic events induce fracture of the mitochondria, nuclear envelopes, and plasma membranes. Additionally, apoptosis (programmed cell death) may occur in peri-infarcted areas and may contribute to myocyte loss. Activation of inflammatory cascades, oxidative stress, and stretching of the myocytes produces mediators that overpower inhibitors of apoptosis, thus activating the apoptosis.

Reversible myocardial dysfunction

Understanding that large areas of dysfunctional but viable myocardium can contribute to the development of cardiogenic shock in patients with MI is important. This potentially reversible dysfunction is often described as myocardial stunning or hibernating myocardium.

Myocardial stunning represents postischemic dysfunction that persists despite restoration of normal blood flow. By definition, myocardial dysfunction from stunning eventually resolves completely. The mechanism of myocardial stunning involves a combination of oxidative stress, abnormalities of calcium homeostasis, and circulating myocardial depressant substances.

Hibernating myocardium is a state of persistently impaired myocardial function at rest, which occurs because of the severely reduced coronary blood flow. Hibernation appears to be an adaptive response to hypoperfusion that may minimize the potential for further ischemia or necrosis. Revascularization of the hibernating (and/or stunned) myocardium generally leads to improved myocardial function.

Consideration for the presence of myocardial stunning and hibernation is vital in patients with cardiogenic shock because of the therapeutic implications of these conditions. Hibernating myocardium improves with revascularization, whereas the stunned myocardium retains inotropic reserve and can respond to inotropic stimulation. Although hibernation is considered a different physiologic process than that of myocardial stunning, the conditions are difficult to distinguish in the clinical setting and they often coexist.

Cardiovascular mechanics of cardiogenic shock

The main mechanical defect in cardiogenic shock is that the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume curve shifts to the right because of a marked reduction in contractility. As a result, at a similar or even lower systolic pressure, the ventricle is able to eject less blood volume per beat. Therefore, the end-systolic volume is usually greatly increased in persons with cardiogenic shock. The stroke volume is decreased. To compensate for the diminished stroke volume, the curvilinear diastolic pressure-volume curve also shifts to the right, with a decrease in diastolic compliance. This leads to increased diastolic filling that is associated with an increase in end-diastolic pressure. The attempt to enhance cardiac output by this mechanism comes at the cost of having a higher left ventricular diastolic filling pressure, which ultimately increases myocardial oxygen demand and causes pulmonary edema.

As a result of decreased contractility, the patient develops elevated left ventricular and RV filling pressures and low cardiac output. Mixed venous oxygen saturation falls because of the increased tissue oxygen extraction, which is due to the low cardiac output. This, combined with the intrapulmonary shunting that is often present, contributes to substantial arterial oxygen desaturation.

Systemic effects

When a critical mass of left ventricular myocardium becomes ischemic and fails to pump effectively, stroke volume and cardiac output are curtailed. Myocardial ischemia is further exacerbated by compromised myocardial perfusion due to hypotension and tachycardia. The pump failure increases ventricular diastolic pressures concomitantly, causing additional wall stress, hence elevating myocardial oxygen requirements. Systemic perfusion is compromised by decreased cardiac output, with tissue hypoperfusion intensifying anaerobic metabolism and instigating the formation of lactic acid, which further deteriorates the systolic performance of the myocardium.

Depressed myocardial function also leads to the activation of several physiologic compensatory mechanisms. These include sympathetic stimulation, which increases the heart rate and cardiac contractility and causes renal fluid retention, hence augmenting the left ventricular preload. The raised heart rate and contractility increases myocardial oxygen demand, further worsening myocardial ischemia. Fluid retention and impaired left ventricular diastolic filling triggered by tachycardia and ischemia contribute to pulmonary venous congestion and hypoxemia. Sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction to maintain systemic blood pressure amplifies myocardial afterload, which additionally impairs cardiac performance. Finally, excessive myocardial oxygen demand with simultaneous inadequate myocardial perfusion worsens myocardial ischemia, initiating a vicious cycle that ultimately ends in death, if uninterrupted.

Usually, both systolic myocardial dysfunction and diastolic myocardial dysfunction are present in patients with cardiogenic shock. Metabolic derangements that impair myocardial contractility further compromise systolic ventricular function. Myocardial ischemia decreases myocardial compliance, thereby elevating left ventricular filling pressure at a given end-diastolic volume (diastolic dysfunction), which leads to pulmonary congestion and congestive heart failure. For more information, see Medscape's Heart Failure Resource Center.

Shock state

Shock state, irrespective of the etiology, is described as a syndrome initiated by acute systemic hypoperfusion that leads to tissue hypoxia and vital organ dysfunction. All forms of shock are characterized by inadequate perfusion to meet the metabolic demands of the tissues. A maldistribution of blood flow to end organs begets cellular hypoxia and end organ damage, the well-described multisystem organ dysfunction syndrome. The organs of vital importance are the brain, heart, and kidneys.

A decline in higher cortical function may indicate diminished perfusion of the brain, which leads to an altered mental status ranging from confusion and agitation to flaccid coma. The heart plays a central role in propagating shock. Depressed coronary perfusion leads to worsening cardiac dysfunction and a cycle of self-perpetuating progression of global hypoperfusion. Renal compensation for reduced perfusion results in diminished glomerular filtration, causing oliguria and subsequent renal failure.

Frequency

United States

The incidence rate of cardiogenic shock ranges from 5-10% in patients with acute MI. In the Worcester Heart Attack Study, a community-wide analysis, the reported incidence rate is 7.5%.13 The literature contains few data on cardiogenic shock in patients without ischemia.

International

Several multicenter thrombolytic trials in Europe report a prevalence rate of cardiogenic shock following MI of approximately 7%.

Mortality/Morbidity

The historic mortality rates from cardiogenic shock are 80-90%; more recent studies have reported somewhat lower in-hospital mortality rates, in the range of 56-67%. With the advent of thrombolytics, improved interventional procedures, and better medical therapies for heart failure, the mortality rates from cardiogenic shock are expected to decline.

  • The following predictors of mortality were identified from the GUSTO-I trial14 : increasing age; prior MI; altered sensorium; cold, clammy skin; and oliguria.
  • Mortality rates are similar in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to STEMI and NSTACS.
  • Echocardiographic predictors such as left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and mitral regurgitation are independent predictors. EF of less than 28% is associated with a survival rate of 24% at 1 year compared to a survival rate of 56% with a higher EF. Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation led to a 1-year survival rate of 31% compared to a survival rate of 58% in those with no regurgitation.

Sex

The overall incidence of cardiogenic shock is higher in men compared to women because of the increased prevalence of coronary artery disease in males. However, the percentage of female patients with MI who develop cardiogenic shock is higher compared to their male counterparts.

Clinical

History

Cardiogenic shock is a medical emergency. A complete clinical assessment is critical to understanding the cause of the shock and to targeting therapy for correcting the cause.

  • Cardiogenic shock following acute MI generally develops after admission to the hospital, although a small number of patients are in shock at presentation. Patients demonstrate clinical evidence of hypoperfusion (low cardiac output), which is manifested by sinus tachycardia, low urine output, and cool extremities. Systemic hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg or a decrease in mean blood pressure by 30 mm Hg, ultimately develops and further propagates tissue hypoperfusion.
  • Most patients who develop acute MI present with an abrupt onset of squeezing or heavy substernal chest pain; the pain may radiate to the left arm or the neck. The chest pain may be atypical, the location being epigastric or only in the neck or arm. The pain quality may be burning, sharp, or stabbing. The pain may be absent in persons with diabetes or in elderly individuals.
  • Patients also may report associated autonomic symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and sweating.
  • A history of previous cardiac disease, use of cocaine, previous MI, or previous cardiac surgery should be obtained. A patient thought to have myocardial ischemia should have an assessment for cardiac risk factors. The evaluation should reveal a history of hyperlipidemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, or cigarette smoking or should reveal a family history of premature coronary artery disease. The presence of 2 or more risk factors increases the likelihood of acute MI.
  • Other associated symptoms are diaphoresis, exertional dyspnea, or dyspnea at rest. Presyncope or syncope, palpitations, generalized anxiety, and depression are other features indicative of poor cardiac function.

Physical

Cardiogenic shock is diagnosed after documentation of myocardial dysfunction and exclusion of alternative causes of hypotension, such as hypovolemia, hemorrhage, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, pericardial tamponade, aortic dissection, or preexisting valvular disease. Shock is present if evidence of multisystem organ hypoperfusion is detected upon physical examination.

  • Patients in shock usually appear ashen or cyanotic and have cool skin and mottled extremities.
  • Peripheral pulses are rapid and faint and may be irregular if arrhythmias are present.
  • Jugular venous distention and crackles in the lungs are usually (but not always) present. Peripheral edema also may be present.
  • Heart sounds are usually distant, and both third and fourth heart sounds may be present.
  • The pulse pressure may be low, and patients are usually tachycardic.
  • Patients show signs of hypoperfusion, such as altered mental status and decreased urine output.
  • A systolic murmur is generally heard in patients with acute mitral regurgitation or ventricular septal rupture.
  • The associated parasternal thrill indicates the presence of a ventricular septal defect, whereas the murmur of mitral regurgitation may be limited to early systole.
  • The systolic murmur, which becomes louder upon Valsalva and prompt standing, suggests hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (idiopathic hypertropic subaortic stenosis).

Causes

Based on the etiology and pathophysiology, cardiogenic shock can be divided into systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, valvular dysfunction, cardiac arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, and mechanical complications.

Systolic dysfunction

The primary abnormality in systolic dysfunction is abated myocardial contractility. Acute MI or ischemia is the most common cause; cardiogenic shock is more likely to be associated with anterior MI. The other causes of systolic dysfunction leading to cardiogenic shock are severe myocarditis, end-stage cardiomyopathy (including valvular causes), myocardial contusion, and prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass.

Diastolic dysfunction

Increased left ventricular diastolic chamber stiffness contributes to cardiogenic shock during cardiac ischemia, but also in the late stages of hypovolemic shock and septic shock. Increased diastolic dysfunction is particularly detrimental when systolic contractility is also depressed. The causes of cardiogenic shock due primarily to diastolic dysfunction are listed in Diastolic dysfunction.

Valvular dysfunction

Valvular dysfunction may immediately lead to cardiogenic shock or may aggravate other etiologies of shock. Acute mitral regurgitation secondary to papillary muscle rupture or dysfunction is caused by ischemic injury. Rarely, acute obstruction of the mitral valve by left atrial thrombus may result in cardiogenic shock by means of severely decreased cardiac output. Aortic and mitral regurgitation reduce forward flow, raise end-diastolic pressure, and aggravate shock associated with other etiologies.

Cardiac arrhythmias

Ventricular tachyarrhythmias are often associated with cardiogenic shock. Furthermore, bradyarrhythmias may cause or aggravate shock due to another etiology. Sinus tachycardia and atrial tachyarrhythmias contribute to hypoperfusion and aggravate shock.

Coronary artery disease

Cardiogenic shock is generally associated with the loss of more than 40% of the left ventricular myocardium, although in patients with previously compromised left ventricular function, even a small infarction may precipitate shock. Cardiogenic shock is more likely to develop in people who are elderly or diabetic or in those who have had a previous inferior infarction.

Mechanical complications

Complication of acute MI, such as acute mitral regurgitation, large RV infarction, and rupture of the interventricular septum or left ventricular free wall, are other causes of cardiogenic shock.

Specific causes of cardiogenic shock include the following:

Left ventricular failure

  • Systolic dysfunction (decreased contractility)
    • Ischemia/MI
    • Global hypoxemia
    • Valvular disease (see Valvular or structural abnormality)
    • Myocardial depressant drugs (eg, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiarrhythmics)
    • Myocardial contusion
    • Respiratory acidosis
    • Metabolic derangements (eg, acidosis, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia)
  • Diastolic dysfunction/increased myocardial diastolic stiffness
    • Ischemia
    • Ventricular hypertrophy
    • Restrictive cardiomyopathy
    • Consequence of prolonged hypovolemic or septic shock
    • Ventricular interdependence
    • External compression by pericardial tamponade
  • Greatly increased afterload
    • Aortic stenosis
    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    • Dynamic aortic outflow tract obstruction
    • Coarctation of the aorta
    • Malignant hypertension
  • Valvular or structural abnormality
    • Mitral stenosis
    • Endocarditis
    • Mitral aortic regurgitation
    • Obstruction due to atrial myxoma or thrombus
    • Papillary muscle dysfunction or rupture
    • Ruptured septum or free wall arrhythmias
  • Decreased contractility
    • RV infarction
    • Ischemia
    • Hypoxia
    • Acidosis

Right ventricular failure

  • Greatly increased afterload
    • Pulmonary embolism
    • Pulmonary vascular disease (eg, pulmonary arterial hypertension, veno-occlusive disease)
    • Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction
    • Peak end-expiratory pressure
    • High alveolar pressure
    • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
    • Pulmonary fibrosis
    • Sleep disordered breathing
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Arrhythmias
    • Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias (tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy)
    • Conduction abnormalities (eg, atrioventricular blocks, sinus bradycardia)

More on Cardiogenic Shock

Overview: Cardiogenic Shock
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cardiogenic Shock
Treatment & Medication: Cardiogenic Shock
Follow-up: Cardiogenic Shock
Multimedia: Cardiogenic Shock
References

References

  1. Ajani AE, Maruff P, Warren R, et al. Impact of early percutaneous coronary intervention on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. Mar 1 2001;87(5):633-5, A9-10. [Medline].

  2. Alonso DR, Scheidt S, Post M, Killip T. Pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock. Quantification of myocardial necrosis, clinical, pathologic and electrocardiographic correlations. Circulation. Sep 1973;48(3):588-96. [Medline].

  3. Ammann P, Straumann E, Naegeli B, et al. Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Int J Cardiol. Feb 2002;82(2):127-31. [Medline].

  4. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A, et al. Relation of time to treatment and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. Jun 1 2002;89(11):1248-52. [Medline].

  5. Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, et al. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J. Jun 2001;141(6):933-9. [Medline].

  6. Bengur AR, Meliones JN. Cardiogenic shock. New Horiz. May 1998;6(2):139-49. [Medline].

  7. Berger PB, Tuttle RH, Holmes DR, et al. One-year survival among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, and its relation to early revascularization: results from the GUSTO-I trial. Circulation. Feb 23 1999;99(7):873-8. [Medline].

  8. Chauhan A, Zubaid M, Ricci DR, et al. Left main intervention revisited: early and late outcome of PTCA and stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. May 1997;41(1):21-9. [Medline].

  9. Dzavik V, Burton JR, Kee C, et al. Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients. Can J Cardiol. Jul 1998;14(7):923-30. [Medline].

  10. Edep ME, Brown DL. Effect of early revascularization on mortality from cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in California. Am J Cardiol. May 15 2000;85(10):1185-8. [Medline].

  11. Fechner PU. [Diseases of the orbit]. Buch Augenarzt. 1976;67(0):136-43. [Medline].

  12. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, et al. Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988. N Engl J Med. Oct 17 1991;325(16):1117-22. [Medline].

  13. Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J, et al. Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1162-8. [Medline].

  14. Hasdai D, Califf RM, Thompson TD, et al. Predictors of cardiogenic shock after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 2000;35(1):136-43. [Medline].

  15. Hasdai D, Holmes DR, Topol EJ, et al. Frequency and clinical outcome of cardiogenic shock during acute myocardial infarction among patients receiving reteplase or alteplase. Results from GUSTO-III. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries. Eur Heart J. Jan 1999;20(2):128-35. [Medline].

  16. Hasdai D, Holmes DR, Califf RM, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: predictors of death. GUSTO Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue-Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. Am Heart J. Jul 1999;138(1 Pt 1):21-31. [Medline].

  17. Ho TC, Ting CT, Liu TJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary revascularization improves the prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome: a chronological study. Int J Cardiol. Jun 2003;89(2-3):135-43. [Medline].

  18. Hochman JS, Boland J, Sleeper LA, et al. Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an International Registry. SHOCK Registry Investigators. Circulation. Feb 1 1995;91(3):873-81. [Medline].

  19. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. Aug 26 1999;341(9):625-34. [Medline].

  20. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA. Jan 10 2001;285(2):190-2. [Medline].

  21. Hochman JS, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction--etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1063-70. [Medline].

  22. Hollenberg SM, Kavinsky CJ, Parrillo JE. Cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. Jul 6 1999;131(1):47-59. [Medline].

  23. Holmes DR, Bates ER, Kleiman NS, et al. Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 1995;26(3):668-74. [Medline].

  24. Holmes DR, Berger PB, Hochman JS, et al. Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation. Nov 16 1999;100(20):2067-73. [Medline].

  25. Hsu RB, Chien CY, Wang SS, Chu SH. Survival after early surgical revascularization in patients with both acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. J Formos Med Assoc. Nov 2001;100(11):725-8. [Medline].

  26. Jacobs AK, French JK, Col J, et al. Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded coronaries for Cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1091-6. [Medline].

  27. Lehmann A, Boldt J. New pharmacologic approaches for the perioperative treatment of ischemic cardiogenic shock. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. Feb 2005;19(1):97-108. [Medline].

  28. Mehta SR, Eikelboom JW, Natarajan MK, et al. Impact of right ventricular involvement on mortality and morbidity in patients with inferior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jan 2001;37(1):37-43. [Medline].

  29. Menon V, Webb JG, Hillis LD, et al. Outcome and profile of ventricular septal rupture with cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1110-6. [Medline].

  30. Mueller H, Ayres SM, Conklin EF, et al. The effects of intra-aortic counterpulsation on cardiac performance and metabolism in shock associated with acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. Sep 1971;50(9):1885-900. [Medline].

  31. Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, Bates ER, et al. Impact of thrombolysis, intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, and their combination in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for ca. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1123-9. [Medline].

  32. Scheidt S, Wilner G, Mueller H, et al. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in cardiogenic shock. Report of a co-operative clinical trial. N Engl J Med. May 10 1973;288(19):979-84. [Medline].

  33. Slater J, Brown RJ, Antonelli TA, et al. Cardiogenic shock due to cardiac free-wall rupture or tamponade after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1117-22. [Medline].

  34. Srimahachota S, Boonyaratavej S, Udayachalerm W, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: immediate and late outcomes. J Med Assoc Thai. Oct 2001;84(10):1449-54. [Medline].

  35. Sutton AG, Finn P, Hall JA, et al. Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock. Heart. Mar 2005;91(3):339-44. [Medline].

  36. Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambrecht R, et al. Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation. Dec 11 2001;104(24):2917-22. [Medline].

  37. Thompson CR, Buller CE, Sleeper LA, et al. Cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we use emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1104-9. [Medline].

  38. Urban P, Stauffer JC, Bleed D, et al. A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock-(S)MASH. Eur Heart J. Jul 1999;20(14):1030-8. [Medline].

  39. Webb JG, Sleeper LA, Buller CE, et al. Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1084-90. [Medline].

  40. Webb JG, Sanborn TA, Sleeper LA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry. Am Heart J. Jun 2001;141(6):964-70. [Medline].

  41. Wong SC, Sanborn T, Sleeper LA, et al. Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 2000;36(3 Suppl A):1077-83. [Medline].

  42. Gowda RM, Fox JT, Khan IA. Cardiogenic shock: Basics and clinical considerations. Int J Cardiol. Nov 23 2007;[Medline].

  43. Windecker S. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. Oct 2007;13(5):521-7. [Medline].

  44. Singh M, White J, Hasdai D, Hodgson PK, Berger PB, Topol EJ. Long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock: insights from the GUSTO-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 30 2007;50(18):1752-8. [Medline].

  45. Singh M, White J, Hasdai D, Hodgson PK, Berger PB, Topol EJ. Long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock: insights from the GUSTO-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 30 2007;50(18):1752-8. [Medline].

  46. Bailey A, Pope TW, Moore SA, Campbell CL. The tragedy of TRIUMPH for nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in cardiogenic shock: where do we go from here?. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7(5):337-45. [Medline].

  47. Jeger RV, Lowe AM, Buller CE, Pfisterer ME, Dzavik V, Webb JG. Hemodynamic parameters are prognostically important in cardiogenic shock but similar following early revascularization or initial medical stabilization - A report from the SHOCK Trial. Chest. Oct 20 2007;[Medline].

  48. Farrar DJ, Lawson JH, Litwak P, Cederwall G. Thoratec VAD system as a bridge to heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant. Jul-Aug 1990;9(4):415-22; discussion 422-3. [Medline].

  49. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. Nov 15 2001;345(20):1435-43. [Medline].

  50. Damme L, Heatley J, Radovancevic B. Clinical results with the HeartMate LVAD: Worldwide Registry update. J Congestive Heart Failure Circ Support. 2001;2,:5-7(3).

  51. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W. Long-term mechanical left ventricular assistance for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. Nov 15 2001;345(20):1435-43. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

cardiogenic shock, cardiac failure, heart failure, myocardial infarction, MI, ST-elevation MI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, NSTEMI, unstable angina, myocardial ischemia, heart attack, cardiac dysfunction, acute myocarditis, sustained arrhythmia, acute valvular catastrophe, end-stage cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, CAD, myocardial pathology, myocardial stunning, hibernating myocardium, systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, valvular dysfunction, cardiac arrhythmias, mechanical heart complications, left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume curve, curvilinear diastolic pressure-volume curve, shock state, hemodynamic support, vasopressor supportive therapy, inotropic supportive therapy, thrombolytic therapy, intra-aortic balloon pump, ventricular assist device, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary artery bypass grafting, shock trial

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Thoracic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal Society of Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and World Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Michael E Zevitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Finch University of the Health Sciences, The Chicago Medical School; Consulting Staff, Private Practice
Michael E Zevitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, and Michigan State Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Russell F Kelly, MD, Program Director, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Cook County Hospital, Rush Medical College
Russell F Kelly, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Ronald J Oudiz, MD, Director of Pulmonary Hypertension, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Ronald J Oudiz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, and American Heart Association
Disclosure: Actelion Grant/research funds Clinical Trials + honoraria; Encysive Grant/research funds Clinical Trials + honoraria; Gilead Grant/research funds Clinical Trials + honoraria; Pfizer Grant/research funds Clinical Trials + honoraria; United Therapeutics Grant/research funds Clinical Trials + honoraria

CME Editor

Amer Suleman, MD, Consultant in Electrophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical City Dallas Hospital
Amer Suleman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Institute of Stress, American Society of Hypertension, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Royal Society of Medicine, and Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Patrice Delafontaine, MD, FACC, FAHA, FACP, FESC, Sidney W and Marilyn S Lassen Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chief, Section of Cardiology, Director, Cardiovascular Center of Excellence, Tulane University; Professor of Physiology, Chair, Department of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine
Patrice Delafontaine, MD, FACC, FAHA, FACP, FESC is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Diabetes Association, American Federation for Clinical Research, American Federation for Medical Research, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Clinical Investigation, Association of American Physicians, Association of Professors of Cardiology, Association of Professors of Medicine, Endocrine Society, European Society of Cardiology, Louisiana State Medical Society, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.