Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis Treatment & Management

  • Author: F Brian Boudi, MD; Chief Editor: Yasmine Subhi Ali, MD, MSCI, FACC, FACP   more...
 
Updated: May 15, 2012
 

Approach Considerations

The treatment goals for patients with coronary artery atherosclerosis are to relieve symptoms of CAD and to prevent future cardiac events, such as unstable angina, AMI, and death.

The mainstays of pharmacologic therapy of angina include nitrates, beta-blockers, statins, calcium-channel blockers, and ranolazine.[37] The prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis requires control of the known modifiable risk factors for this disease. This includes therapeutic lifestyle changes and the medical treatment of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus.

Typically, patients with CAD are first seen after they present with a cardiac event. The main focus of their treatment is the index event. The past 4 decades have witnessed tremendous progress in the areas of acute cardiac care, coronary care unit expansion, thrombolytic usage, and PCI. Nevertheless, prevention of cardiac events is likely to have the largest impact on decreasing the burden of atherosclerosis.

High-risk subgroups, in particular, can be targeted for early intervention. Grover and colleagues showed statin therapy in diabetic patients without CAD to be as cost-effective as statin therapy in nondiabetic patients with CAD. Pharmacotherapeutic strategies that affect the risk factor profile, such as the administration of statins for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) reduction or the administration of agents that alter atherosclerotic plaque, are of paramount importance.

Prevention of future cardiac events

Findings from the World Health Organization's Monitor Trends in Cardiovascular Diseases (MONICA) project involving 21 countries showed a 4% fall in CAD death rates. Improvement in the case fatality rate accounted for only one third of the decline; two thirds of the decline resulted from a reduction in the number of events. These findings strongly suggest that the largest impact on decreasing the global burden of atherosclerosis will come from prevention of events.

Fortunately, the natural history of CAD is characterized by early onset and a long dormant phase. This provides an excellent opportunity to intervene in order to reduce the number and severity of cardiovascular events.

Next

Pharmacologic Strategies

The goals of therapy should include arresting atherosclerosis or even reversing its progression. Large, multicenter randomized trials of various pharmacologic modalities have recently achieved great success in the treatment of patients with coronary artery atherosclerosis. In addition, addressing risk factors with lifestyle changes is an integral part of atherosclerosis prevention. Therapy with lipid-lowering agents should be a component of multiple risk factor intervention and is indicated in primary prevention as an adjunct to diet therapy when the response to a diet restricted in saturated fat and cholesterol has been inadequate.

Substantial evidence supports the use of statins in the secondary prevention of CAD, and the efficacy of statins has recently been extended to include primary prevention of CAD in patients with average cholesterol levels. Niacin is superior to ezetimibe for combination therapy in high-risk patients being treated with statin monotherapy. In an industry-supported study, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C levels of < 70 mg/dl (1.81 mol/L) experienced no incremental clinical benefit from the addition of niacin to statin therapy during a 36-month follow-up period, despite significant improvements in HDL-C and triglyceride levels.[38]

In a meta-analysis of nearly 5000 patients, findings showed that statins administered before invasive procedures significantly reduced the risk for postprocedural myocardial infarction.[39] The risk for MI was reduced after percutaneous coronary intervention and noncardiac surgical procedures, but not for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Statins decreased the risk for atrial fibrillation following CABG.

The Clopidogrel After Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease CASCADE trial evaluated the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin on the development of saphenous vein graft disease after CABG. Patients received the standard of care, including postoperative statin therapy with targeted LDL levels less than 100 mg/dL. Twelve months postoperatively, patients returned for coronary angiography and saphenous vein graft (SVG) intravascular ultrasonography. The results suggest statin therapy to achieve LDL levels less than 100 mg/dL is independently associated with improved graft patency.[40]

Statin therapy is also safe and can improve liver tests while reducing cardiovascular morbidity in patients with mild- to moderately-abnormal liver test results that may be attributable to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.[41]

In the United States, the most commonly used guidelines for cholesterol management are those from the NCEP Adult Treatment Panel (ATP). In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is less than 100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of less than 70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option and a reasonable clinical strategy based on available clinical trial evidence. For moderately high-risk persons (≥2 risk factors and 10-y risk of 10-20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is less than 130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal of less than 100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option based on trial evidence.

A separate study found that, compared with placebo or statin monotherapy, evacetrapib as monotherapy or in combination with statins increased HDL-C levels and decreased LDL-C levels. However, further investigation is warranted.[42]

To see complete information on Statins, please go to the main article.

Previous
Next

Treatment of Low HDL levels and High Triglyceride levels in Patients with Diabetes

A combination of low HDL levels and high triglyceride levels is frequently encountered in patients with diabetes and is often referred to as atherogenic dyslipidemia. Many of these patients have metabolic syndrome.

Additional follow-up and analysis of the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial (VA-HIT) indicated that treatment with gemfibrozil versus placebo resulted in a 32% reduction in major cardiovascular events and a 41% reduction in CHD deaths, in 769 male subjects with diabetes mellitus and CHD who had HDL-C levels of less than 40 mg/dL and LDL-C levels of less than 140 mg/dL.

Interestingly, among 1733 nondiabetic men, increased plasma fasting insulin levels and insulin resistance, as assessed by the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; fasting insulin [µU/mL] X fasting glucose [mmol/L]/22.5), were predictive of increased major cardiovascular events and of greater benefit from gemfibrozil treatment.[43, 44]

Somewhat inexplicable was the finding that despite higher plasma triglyceride and lower HDL-C levels in insulin-resistant subjects, these measurements were associated with greater treatment benefit only in those subjects classified as not having insulin resistance by HOMA-IR.

This was the first trial to demonstrate the cardiovascular benefit of treating diabetic and insulin-resistant subjects with low HDL-C levels. Interestingly, the insulin resistance was more predictive of CHD event rate and benefit from gemfibrozil than were HDL-C or triglyceride levels. Because no significant reduction in LDL-C was realized with gemfibrozil therapy, one possibility is that additional CHD benefit would be accrued by adding statins, which have been shown in subgroup analyses of several trials to benefit CHD risk in diabetic patients and in nondiabetic patients with low HDL-C levels.

One caveat is that because of the relatively higher risk of myopathy with combined gemfibrozil-statin treatment and findings that indicate much less risk with statins and fenofibrate, the latter is currently the preferred choice for combined treatment.

Previous
Next

ACE Inhibitors to Reduce Blood Pressure

The efficacy of ACE inhibitors on CAD has been examined in blood pressure reduction studies and in studies of subjects with high risk factors for CAD.

ACE inhibitors are effective blood pressure–reducing agents and affect the heart and vasculature through direct and other mechanisms.

ACE inhibitors were not shown to affect plaque in a randomized angiographic regression study, the Quinapril Ischemic Event Trial (QUIET), of 463 subjects with CAD.[45]

B-mode ultrasonographic studies investigating plaque regression have provided confusing results at best. Although the second Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril Trial (PART 2) showed no reduction in intima-media thickness at 4-year follow-up in 617 subjects randomized to placebo or ramipril (5-10 mg/d), the Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound Changes with Ramipril and Vitamin E (SECURE) showed a reduction in carotid intima-media thickness proportional to the dose of ramipril (2.5-10 mg/d) in 750 subjects over a 4.5-year follow-up period.[46]

ACE inhibitors probably affect endothelial function, as well as those of A-II and kinin, to elicit the clinical effects observed in the clinical trials. Tissue binding is variable among the ACE inhibitors, with the highest affinity shown by quinapril, benazepril, and ramipril. In the Trial on Reversing Endothelial Dysfunction (TREND),[47] which included 105 subjects with CAD (but without CHF or left ventricular dysfunction), the group receiving quinapril at 40 mg/d showed significantly improved response to acetylcholine. ACE inhibitors also increase levels of nitric oxide by increasing its release through a kinin-mediated pathway and through reduction of its breakdown.

Statin therapy decreases cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in both women and men.[48]

In addition, ACE inhibitors decrease the plasma levels of type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor, increase the release of tissue-type plasminogen activator, and favorably affect the fibrinolytic balance, an effect not observed with the angiotensin receptor–blocking agents.

In terms of blood pressure reduction, even though a greater stroke incidence was observed with higher baseline blood pressure in the treatment group in the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP), a pooled analysis of 16,161 patients from blood-pressure control trials evaluating ACE inhibitors showed no difference in the cardiovascular outcome risk.[49]

A possible direct effect of ACE inhibitors on atherosclerosis, independent of blood pressure reduction, was suggested by the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study,[50] which included 9297 subjects with history of CAD, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes, along with one other CAD risk factor (eg, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypoalphalipoproteinemia, tobacco abuse, microalbuminuria). Subjects were randomized to placebo or ramipril (10 mg/d). At 5-year follow-up, the cardiac death rate was reduced by 25%, nonfatal MI by 20%, need for bypass surgery/PTCA by 16%, and all-cause mortality by 16%. The effects were unrelated to the blood pressure–lowering effect.

Previous
Next

Antiplatelet Agents for Acute Coronary Events

Antiplatelet agents help reduce the number of acute coronary events. Convincing data are available from the following studies:

  • Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration[51]
  • Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (CAPRIE) trial[52]
  • Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Events (CURE) trial[53]
  • Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (TRITON TIMI-38)[54]

The risk of myocardial ischemic events in patients with ACS has been shown to be reduced by means of platelet inhibition with the use of aspirin. Currently, all patients with documented CAD are recommended to be treated with daily aspirin, unless contraindicated. The CAPRIE trial studies the efficacy of clopidogrel (an inhibitor of the P2Y12 adenosine-diphosphate receptor), compared with that of aspirin, on long-term events.[52] Recurrent cardiovascular events were modestly reduced in patients treated with clopidogrel, in comparison with aspirin.

Extending this, the CURE trial found that regardless of the initial treatment strategy (medical therapy, PCI, or CABG), treatment with the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel was superior to aspirin alone in reducing recurrent events for up to 12 months after hospitalization with ACS. However, in the CHARISMA trial, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel did not significantly reduce recurrent events in patients with stable cardiovascular disease or in asymptomatic patients at high risk for cardiovascular events.

In the TRITON TIMI-38 trial, prasugrel, a more potent thienopyridine P2Y12 inhibitor, proved more effective than clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, among patients with ACS who were scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding, was higher with prasugrel (2.4% versus 1.8% with clopidogrel), although overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that after an ACS, all patients should receive dual antiplatelet therapy, ideally for 12 months, followed by lifelong aspirin therapy.[37] The ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 Expert Consensus provides a detailed report on reducing the GI risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID Uuse.[55]

Previous
Next

Pharmacologic Treatment of Angina

A number of agents have proven helpful for the treatment of angina. These include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, nitrates, and ranolazine (see below).[37]

Beta-blockers

Beta-blockers inhibit sympathetic stimulation of the heart, reducing heart rate and contractility; this can decrease myocardial oxygen demand and thus prevent or relieve angina in patients with CAD. Since beta-blockers reduce the heart rate–blood pressure product during exercise, the onset of angina or the ischemic threshold during exercise is delayed or avoided. All types of beta-blockers appear to be equally effective in the treatment of exertional angina. The ACC and AHA recommend beta-blockers, unless contraindicated, in all patients with stable angina who have had an ACS or who have left ventricular dysfunction.

Calcium channel blockers

Calcium-channel blockers prevent calcium entry into vascular smooth muscle cells and myocytes, which leads to coronary and peripheral vasodilatation, decreased atrioventricular (AV) conduction, and reduced contractility. In patients with angina, these effects result in decreased coronary vascular resistance and increased coronary blood flow. Calcium blockers also reduce systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressure and provide a negative inotropic effect.

Nitrates

Nitrates are effective in the treatment of acute anginal symptoms. In this situation, they are usually given sublingually. The primary anti-ischemic effect of nitrates is to decrease myocardial oxygen demand by producing systemic vasodilation, although they also cause modest coronary and arteriolar vasodilation, as well as venodilation.

In patients with chronic stable angina, nitrate therapy improves exercise tolerance, time to onset of angina, and ST-segment depression during exercise testing. They are particularly effective in combination with beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers.

Ranolazine

Ranolazine is a novel antianginal agent believed to relieve ischemia by reducing myocardial cellular sodium and calcium overload via inhibition of the late sodium current of the cardiac action potential.

In 3 randomized, double-blind trials of patients with chronic angina, ranolazine prolonged exercise duration and reduced symptoms when given as either monotherapy or in combination with other antianginal drugs. When evaluated in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS, ranolazine reduced recurrent ischemia but did not significantly reduce the risk of death or MI at 1 year.

Previous
Next

Hormone Therapy Concerns

Hormone therapy has been found to be more risky than beneficial as a means of protecting postmenopausal women against CAD.[15] The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS-II), completed in 2002, reported that after 6.8 years, hormone therapy did not reduce risk of cardiovascular events.[56]

Similarly, in a study by the Women’s Health Initiative, overall health risks exceeded benefits from the use of combined estrogen and progestin therapy as a means of primary prevention of CAD in healthy, postmenopausal women. Participants in the trial were randomized into hormone therapy (n = 8506) or placebo (n = 8102) groups. The average follow-up period was 5.2 years. All-cause mortality in the study was unaffected by the combination therapy.[57]

Because of overall increased risk, combined estrogen and progestin therapy should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CAD.[58]

Previous
Next

Antibiotic Therapy in Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis

Although inflammation is considered to be a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, antibiotic therapy does not appear to have a significant role in secondary prevention of this disorder. Several multicenter trials have evaluated the effect of antibiotic therapy on recurrent cardiac events when used as secondary prevention. The Azithromycin in Coronary Artery Disease: Elimination of Myocardial Infarction with Chlamydia (ACADEMIC) trial,[59] the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome (AZACS) study,[60] the South Thames Trial of Antibiotics in Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina (STAMINA),[61] the Azithromycin Coronary Events Study (ACES),[62] and the antibiotic arm of the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE-IT) trial[63] all returned negative results in terms of any significant benefit from antibiotic therapy.

Previous
Next

Revascularization Procedures

Revascularization therapies for symptomatic or ischemia-producing atherosclerotic lesions include percutaneous approaches and open heart surgery. For a detailed discussion of these approaches, see Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Comparison of Revascularization Procedures in Coronary Artery Disease. Long-term mortality is similar after CABG and PCI in most patient subgroups with multivessel coronary artery disease; therefore, the choice of treatment should depend on patient preferences for other outcomes. Exceptions to this are patients with diabetes and those age 65 years or older; Hlatky et al found CABG to be a superior option in these subgroups, because of lower mortality.[64] Other revascularization techniques include transmyocardial laser revascularization.

Medical therapy versus PCI revascularization

The COURAGE trial demonstrated that performing PCI in severe lesions reduces angina but does not improve overall outcomes over medical therapy alone in patients with stable CAD. The trial randomized patients with stable CAD, ischemia, and significant stenoses of 70% or more in at least 1 proximal coronary artery to a regimen of optimal medical treatment alone or optimal medical treatment combined with PCI. The primary outcome was death from any cause or non-fatal MI during a follow-up period of between 2.5 and 7 years (median 4.6 years).[65]

The results of COURAGE showed no evidence of a better outcome for the PCI group than for the group receiving medical treatment alone, for the combined endpoint death, MI and stroke (20.0% PCI group vs 19.5% medical treatment); for admission to hospital for ACS (12.4% vs 11.8%, respectively); or for MI (13.2% vs 12.3%, respectively). Thus, at least among the patients studied in COURAGE, both treatment strategies resulted in similar outcomes for major cardiac complications and deaths. There was a statistically significant advantage for reduction in the prevalence of angina in the PCI group, with respect to freedom from angina. However, by the end of 5 years of follow-up, the difference was no longer significant (74% of the PCI group and 72% of the group receiving medical treatment only were free of angina).

The results of the trial likely resulted from the fact that most of the lesions responsible for later coronary events are nonobstructive. Thus, prophylactic stenting of all identified lesions (the full metal jacket) is impractical and certainly not justified at this time.

In a prospective, natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis, patients underwent 3-vessel coronary angiography and gray-scale and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonographic imaging after percutaneous coronary intervention.[66] Major adverse events were related to both recurrence at the site of culprit lesions and to nonculprit lesions.

Previous
Next

Lifestyle Changes

Diet

High intakes of red or processed meat were associated with modest increases in total mortality, cancer mortality, and cardiovascular disease mortality in a study by Sinha et al. The baseline population was a cohort of half a million people aged 50-71 years from the National Institutes of Health-AARP (formerly known as the American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study.[67]

A meta-analysis by Ferdowsian and Barnard suggested that plant-based diets are effective in lowering plasma cholesterol concentrations. In a review of 4 types of plant-based diets studied in 27 trials, a vegetarian or vegan diet combined with nuts, soy, and/or fiber demonstrated the greatest effects (up to 35% reduction in plasma LDL-C, followed by vegan and ovolactovegetarian diets. Diets that included small amounts of lean meat demonstrated less dramatic reductions in levels of total cholesterol and LDL.[68]

The ATP III recommended a multifaceted lifestyle approach to reduce the risk for CHD. This is the approach of therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLCs), and its essential features are as follows:

  • Reduced intake of saturated fats (< 7% of total energy intake) and cholesterol (< 200 mg/d)
  • Therapeutic options for enhancing LDL lowering, such as plant stanols/sterols (2 g/d) and increased viscous (soluble) fiber intake (10-25 g/d)
  • Weight reduction
  • Increased physical activity

To initiate TLCs, intake of saturated fats and cholesterol is first reduced to lower LDL-C levels. To improve overall health, the ATP III TLC diet generally contains the recommendations embodied in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2000. One exception is that total fat is allowed to range from 25-35% of total energy intake, provided saturated fats and trans fatty acids are kept low. A higher intake of total fat, mostly in the form of unsaturated fat, can help to reduce triglyceride levels and to raise HDL-C levels in persons with the metabolic syndrome.

In accordance with the Dietary Guidelines, moderate physical activity is encouraged. After 6 weeks, the LDL response is determined; if the LDL-C goal has not been achieved, other therapeutic options for LDL lowering, such as plant stanol/sterols and viscous fiber, can be added.

After maximum reduction of LDL-C levels with dietary therapy, emphasis shifts to management of the metabolic syndrome and associated lipid risk factors. Most persons with these latter abnormalities are overweight or obese and sedentary.

Weight therapy for patients who are overweight or obese enhances LDL lowering and provides other health benefits, including modification of other lipid and nonlipid risk factors. Assistance in the treatment of these patients is provided by the Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults from the NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative (1998). Additional risk reduction can be achieved by simultaneously increasing physical activity.

At all stages of dietary therapy, physicians are encouraged to refer patients to registered dietitians or other qualified nutritionists for medical nutrition therapy, which is the term for the nutritional intervention and guidance provided by a nutrition professional.

Moderate alcohol intake (20 g/day or less) in men is associated with a reduced incidence of coronary heart disease events.[69] The mechanism(s) of this benefit is not well understood. Although alcohol may have cardiovascular benefits in women,[70] even moderate intake of alcohol in women has been associated with a significantly increased risk for breast cancer.[71] Heavy alcohol intake is associated with an increased incidence of coronary heart disease events, as well as with cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and other adverse health effects and obviously should be discouraged.

Physical activity

Lack of physical activity is a major modifiable risk factor for CHD. A sedentary lifestyle augments the lipid and nonlipid risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. Inactivity may enhance risk by impairing cardiovascular fitness and coronary blood flow. Regular physical activity reduces very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) levels, raises HDL-C levels, and, in some persons, lowers LDL levels. It can also lower blood pressure, reduce insulin resistance, and favorably influence cardiovascular function.

Most health benefits occur with at least 150 minutes a week of moderate-intensity physical activity, such as brisk walking. Additional benefits occur with more physical activity.[60]

The ATP III therefore recommends that regular physical activity become a routine component in the management of high serum cholesterol levels. The evidence base for this recommendation is contained in the US Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity.

Previous
Next

Additional Therapies for Atherosclerosis

Partial ileal bypass is a surgical procedure that uses shortening of the ileum to lower circulating cholesterol levels. It has been used since the 1960s for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Chelation therapy, using intravenous ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and/or hydrogen peroxide, is a controversial treatment for atherosclerosis. Plethysmography/extracorporeal counterpulsation may reduce angina and improve exercise tolerance in patients with CAD, possibly by improving vascular endothelial function.

Previous
Next

Stable Coronary Artery Disease after Intervention

Patients presenting with stable angina or ischemia after physiologic testing and who have undergone revascularization therapy, either in the form of PCI or CABG, benefit from adjuvant pharmacologic therapy and aggressive risk reduction. In post-PCI patients, adjuvant pharmacologic therapy, such as administration of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (eg, eptifibatide, abciximab), oral aspirin, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine, significantly reduces adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Consultation with a cardiac rehabilitation team is recommended for assistance with aggressive risk reduction, which comprises smoking cessation, weight management, physical exercise, and lipid control.

Previous
Next

Consultations

Consultation with the following may be indicated:

  • Cardiologists
  • Cardiovascular surgeons
  • Lipidologists
  • Nutritionists and dietitians
  • Cardiac rehabilitation team
  • Radiologists

Consultation with a cardiac rehabilitation team for assistance with smoking cessation, weight management, physical exercise, and lipid control is recommended.

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

F Brian Boudi, MD  Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Fellow, Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine; Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine, Mid-Western University; Consulting Staff, Director of Ambulatory Medicine Clinical Rotation, Carl T Hayden Veterans Affairs Medical Center

F Brian Boudi, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Cardiology, American College of Healthcare Executives, American College of Physicians, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Arizona Medical Association, and Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Chowdhury H Ahsan, MD, PhD, MRCP, FSCAI  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Director of Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention, Marlon Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Director of Cardiovascular Research, University Medical Center, University of Nevada School of Medicine

Chowdhury H Ahsan, MD, PhD, MRCP, FSCAI is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

George A Stouffer III, MD  Henry A Foscue Distinguished Professor of Medicine and Cardiology, Director of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Chief of Clinical Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina Medical Center

George A Stouffer III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Steven J Compton, MD, FACC, FACP  Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Alaska Heart Institute, Providence and Alaska Regional Hospitals

Steven J Compton, MD, FACC, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alaska State Medical Association, American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, and Heart Rhythm Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Yasmine Subhi Ali, MD, MSCI, FACC, FACP  President, Nashville Preventive Cardiology, PLLC; Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Yasmine Subhi Ali, MD, MSCI, FACC, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, National Lipid Association, and Tennessee Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

The authors and editors of Medscape Reference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors James L Orford, MBChB and Andrew P Selwyn, MD, MA, FACC, FRCP, and John A McPherson, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI, to the development and writing of a source article.

References
  1. Samady H, Eshtehardi P, McDaniel MC, et al. Coronary artery wall shear stress is associated with progression and transformation of atherosclerotic plaque and arterial remodeling in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. Aug 16 2011;124(7):779-88. [Medline].

  2. Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. Dec 11 2003;349(24):2316-25. [Medline].

  3. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W Jr, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. Sep 1 1995;92(5):1355-74. [Medline].

  4. Ross R, Fuster V. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. In: Ross R, Fuster V, Topol EJ eds. Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:441-62.

  5. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, Larson MG, Massaro JM, Vasan RS. Predicting the 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease: the framingham heart study. Circulation. Jun 23 2009;119(24):3078-84. [Medline].

  6. [Guideline] Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. Dec 14 2010;56(25):e50-103. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. [Guideline] Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, et al. Effectiveness-Based Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Women--2011 Update: A Guideline From the American Heart Association. Circulation. Feb 16 2011;[Medline].

  8. Nakano T, Ninomiya T, Sumiyoshi S, Fujii H, Doi Y, Hirakata H, et al. Association of kidney function with coronary atherosclerosis and calcification in autopsy samples from Japanese elders: the Hisayama study. Am J Kidney Dis. Jan 2010;55(1):21-30. [Medline].

  9. Manzi S, Meilahn EN, Rairie JE, Conte CG, Medsger TA Jr, Jansen-McWilliams L. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison with the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. Mar 1 1997;145(5):408-15. [Medline].

  10. Chung CP, Oeser A, Raggi P, Gebretsadik T, Shintani AK, Sokka T, et al. Increased coronary-artery atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: relationship to disease duration and cardiovascular risk factors. Arthritis Rheum. Oct 2005;52(10):3045-53. [Medline].

  11. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. Dec 4 2002;288(21):2709-16. [Medline].

  12. Deo R, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, et al. Risk factor and prediction modeling for sudden cardiac death in women with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med. Oct 24 2011;171(19):1703-9. [Medline].

  13. Semba RD, Cappola AR, Sun K, et al. Plasma Klotho and Cardiovascular Disease in Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. Aug 24 2011;[Medline].

  14. Guallar-Castillón P, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, et al. Consumption of fried foods and risk of coronary heart disease: Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. BMJ. Jan 23 2012;344:e363. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Schrott HG, Bittner V, Vittinghoff E, Herrington DM, Hulley S. Adherence to National Cholesterol Education Program Treatment goals in postmenopausal women with heart disease. The Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS). The HERS Research Group. JAMA. Apr 23-30 1997;277(16):1281-6. [Medline].

  16. Vittinghoff E, Shlipak MG, Varosy PD, Furberg CD, Ireland CC, Khan SS, et al. Risk factors and secondary prevention in women with heart disease: the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med. Jan 21 2003;138(2):81-9. [Medline].

  17. Conti A, Poggioni C, Viviani G, Luzzi M, Vicidomini S, Zanobetti M, et al. Short- and long-term cardiac events in patients with chest pain with or without known existing coronary disease presenting normal electrocardiogram. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 16 2012;[Medline].

  18. Paynter NP, Mazer NA, Pradhan AD, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Diabetic Men and Women Using Hemoglobin A1c vs Diabetes as a High-Risk Equivalent. Arch Intern Med. Oct 24 2011;171(19):1712-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 4 2004;44(3):720-32. [Medline].

  20. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. Dec 17 2002;106(25):3143-421. [Medline].

  21. Stone NJ, Bilek S, Rosenbaum S. Recent National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III update: adjustments and options. Am J Cardiol. Aug 22 2005;96(4A):53E-59E. [Medline].

  22. Ridker PM, Manson JE, Buring JE, Goldhaber SZ, Hennekens CH. The effect of chronic platelet inhibition with low-dose aspirin on atherosclerotic progression and acute thrombosis: clinical evidence from the Physicians' Health Study. Am Heart J. Dec 1991;122(6):1588-92. [Medline].

  23. Wallentin L, Husted S, Kontny F, Swahn E. Long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmin) and/or early revascularization during instability in coronary artery disease (the FRISC II Study). Am J Cardiol. Sep 4 1997;80(5A):61E-63E. [Medline].

  24. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, et al. The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med. Oct 3 1996;335(14):1001-9. [Medline].

  25. [Best Evidence] Wang TJ, Gona P, Larson MG, Tofler GH, Levy D, Newton-Cheh C. Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. Dec 21 2006;355(25):2631-9. [Medline].

  26. Einstein AJ, Johnson LL, Bokhari S, Son J, Thompson RC, Bateman TM, et al. Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 30 2010;56(23):1914-21. [Medline].

  27. Ferket BS, Genders TS, Colkesen EB, et al. Systematic review of guidelines on imaging of asymptomatic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Apr 12 2011;57(15):1591-600. [Medline].

  28. Bamberg F, Sommer WH, Hoffmann V, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the long-term predictive value of assessment of coronary atherosclerosis by contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 14 2011;57(24):2426-36. [Medline].

  29. Glineur D, D'hoore W, de Kerchove L, et al. Angiographic predictors of 3-year patency of bypass grafts implanted on the right coronary artery system: A prospective randomized comparison of gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and right internal thoracic artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. Nov 2011;142(5):980-8. [Medline].

  30. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. Nov 15 2011;124(20):2215-24. [Medline].

  31. Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, et al. Age- and Sex-Related Differences in All-Cause Mortality Risk Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Findings Results From the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 16 2011;58(8):849-60. [Medline].

  32. O'Rourke RA, Brundage BH, Froelicher VF, Greenland P, Grundy SM, Hachamovitch R, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus Document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jul 2000;36(1):326-40. [Medline].

  33. Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Sacco DE, Albers JJ. Lipid lowering and plaque regression. New insights into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronary disease. Circulation. Jun 1993;87(6):1781-91. [Medline].

  34. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Nov 1 2011;58(19):1989-97. [Medline].

  35. El-Shafei A, Chiravuri R, Stikovac MM, El-Badry MA, Donohue TJ, Bach RG. Comparison of relative coronary Doppler flow velocity reserve to stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Jun 2001;53(2):193-201. [Medline].

  36. Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, Crowe TD, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM. Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes : an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. Feb 15 2000;101(6):598-603. [Medline].

  37. Anderson JL, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. Aug 14 2007;50(7):e1-e157. [Medline].

  38. Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, Koprowicz K, et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. Dec 15 2011;365(24):2255-67. [Medline].

  39. Winchester, DE, et al. Evidence of pre-procedural statin therapy a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1099-109.

  40. Kulik A, Voisine P, Mathieu P, et al. Statin Therapy and Saphenous Vein Graft Disease After Coronary Bypass Surgery: Analysis From the CASCADE Randomized Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. Oct 2011;92(4):1284-91. [Medline].

  41. Athyros VG, Tziomalos K, Gossios TD, Griva T, Anagnostis P, Kargiotis K, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term statin treatment for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease and abnormal liver tests in the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study: a post-hoc analysis. Lancet. Dec 4 2010;376(9756):1916-22. [Medline].

  42. Nicholls SJ, Brewer HB, Kastelein JJ, et al. Effects of the CETP inhibitor evacetrapib administered as monotherapy or in combination with statins on HDL and LDL cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Nov 16 2011;306(19):2099-109. [Medline].

  43. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, Nelson DB, Elam MB, Schaefer EJ. Diabetes, plasma insulin, and cardiovascular disease: subgroup analysis from the Department of Veterans Affairs high-density lipoprotein intervention trial (VA-HIT). Arch Intern Med. Dec 9-23 2002;162(22):2597-604. [Medline].

  44. Robins SJ, Rubins HB, Faas FH, Schaefer EJ, Elam MB, Anderson JW, et al. Insulin resistance and cardiovascular events with low HDL cholesterol: the Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial (VA-HIT). Diabetes Care. May 2003;26(5):1513-7. [Medline].

  45. Pitt B, O'Neill B, Feldman R, Ferrari R, Schwartz L, Mudra H. The QUinapril Ischemic Event Trial (QUIET): evaluation of chronic ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease and preserved left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. May 1 2001;87(9):1058-63. [Medline].

  46. Lonn E, Yusuf S, Dzavik V, Doris C, Yi Q, Smith S, et al. Effects of ramipril and vitamin E on atherosclerosis: the study to evaluate carotid ultrasound changes in patients treated with ramipril and vitamin E (SECURE). Circulation. Feb 20 2001;103(7):919-25. [Medline].

  47. Mancini GB, Henry GC, Macaya C, O'Neill BJ, Pucillo AL, Carere RG. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. The TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) Study. Circulation. Aug 1 1996;94(3):258-65. [Medline].

  48. Kostis WJ, Cheng JQ, Dobrzynski JM, Cabrera J, Kostis JB. Meta-analysis of statin effects in women versus men. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 7 2012;59(6):572-82. [Medline].

  49. Hansson L, Lindholm LH, Niskanen L, Lanke J, Hedner T, Niklason A. Effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition compared with conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) randomised trial. Lancet. Feb 20 1999;353(9153):611-6. [Medline].

  50. Hegele RA. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in the secondary prevention of vascular disease: the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) Trial and its substudies. Curr Atheroscler Rep. Sep 2000;2(5):361-2. [Medline].

  51. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). Jan 30 1988;296(6618):320-31. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  52. Caprie Group. [New analysis of CAPRIE (Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) shows: myocardial infarct most effectively prevented in the clopidogrel group]. Z Kardiol. Feb 1998;87(2 Suppl Herzinfark):1-4. [Medline].

  53. Mehta SR, Yusuf S. The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial programme; rationale, design and baseline characteristics including a meta-analysis of the effects of thienopyridines in vascular disease. Eur Heart J. Dec 2000;21(24):2033-41. [Medline].

  54. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. Nov 15 2007;357(20):2001-15. [Medline].

  55. Abraham NS, Hlatky MA, Antman EM, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 Expert Consensus Document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation. Dec 14 2010;122(24):2619-33. [Medline].

  56. Grady D, Herrington D, Bittner V, Blumenthal R, Davidson M, Hlatky M, et al. Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II). JAMA. Jul 3 2002;288(1):49-57. [Medline].

  57. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Jul 17 2002;288(3):321-33. [Medline].

  58. Rossouw JE. Hormones for coronary disease-full circle. Lancet. Dec 21-28 2002;360(9350):1996-7. [Medline].

  59. Anderson JL, Muhlestein JB, Carlquist J, Allen A, Trehan S, Nielson C, et al. Randomized secondary prevention trial of azithromycin in patients with coronary artery disease and serological evidence for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: The Azithromycin in Coronary Artery Disease: Elimination of Myocardial Infection with Chlamydia (ACADEMIC) study. Circulation. Mar 30 1999;99(12):1540-7. [Medline].

  60. Cercek B, Shah PK, Noc M, Zahger D, Zeymer U, Matetzky S, et al. Effect of short-term treatment with azithromycin on recurrent ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome (AZACS) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Mar 8 2003;361(9360):809-13. [Medline].

  61. Stone AF, Mendall MA, Kaski JC, Edger TM, Risley P, Poloniecki J, et al. Effect of treatment for Chlamydia pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori on markers of inflammation and cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes: South Thames Trial of Antibiotics in Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina (STAMINA). Circulation. Sep 3 2002;106(10):1219-23. [Medline].

  62. Grayston JT, Kronmal RA, Jackson LA, Parisi AF, Muhlestein JB, Cohen JD, et al. Azithromycin for the secondary prevention of coronary events. N Engl J Med. Apr 21 2005;352(16):1637-45. [Medline].

  63. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Grayston JT, Muhlestein B, Giugliano RP, et al. Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. Apr 21 2005;352(16):1646-54. [Medline].

  64. Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet. Apr 4 2009;373(9670):1190-7. [Medline].

  65. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. Apr 12 2007;356(15):1503-16. [Medline].

  66. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. Jan 20 2011;364(3):226-35. [Medline].

  67. Sinha R, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, Leitzmann MF, Schatzkin A. Meat intake and mortality: a prospective study of over half a million people. Arch Intern Med. Mar 23 2009;169(6):562-71. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  68. [Best Evidence] Ferdowsian HR, Barnard ND. Effects of plant-based diets on plasma lipids. Am J Cardiol. Oct 1 2009;104(7):947-56. [Medline].

  69. Streppel MT, Ocké MC, Boshuizen HC, Kok FJ, Kromhout D. Long-term wine consumption is related to cardiovascular mortality and life expectancy independently of moderate alcohol intake: the Zutphen Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. Jul 2009;63(7):534-40. [Medline].

  70. Djoussé L, Lee IM, Buring JE, Gaziano JM. Alcohol consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and death in women: potential mediating mechanisms. Circulation. Jul 21 2009;120(3):237-44. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  71. Lew JQ, Freedman ND, Leitzmann MF, Brinton LA, Hoover RN, Hollenbeck AR. Alcohol and risk of breast cancer by histologic type and hormone receptor status in postmenopausal women: the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. Aug 1 2009;170(3):308-17. [Medline].

  72. Cannon CP, Shah S, Dansky HM, et al. Safety of anacetrapib in patients with or at high risk for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. Dec 16 2010;363(25):2406-15. [Medline].

  73. Denton TA, Fonarow GC, LaBresh KA, Trento A. Secondary prevention after coronary bypass: the American Heart Association "Get with the Guidelines" program. Ann Thorac Surg. Mar 2003;75(3):758-60. [Medline].

  74. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, et al. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med. Nov 16 1995;333(20):1301-7. [Medline].

  75. Haffner SM, Alexander CM, Cook TJ, Boccuzzi SJ, Musliner TA, Pedersen TR, et al. Reduced coronary events in simvastatin-treated patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes or impaired fasting glucose levels: subgroup analyses in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Arch Intern Med. Dec 13-27 1999;159(22):2661-7. [Medline].

  76. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. Nov 19 1994;344(8934):1383-9. [Medline].

  77. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, et al. Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study. JAMA. May 27 1998;279(20):1615-22. [Medline].

  78. Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ, et al. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N Engl J Med. Dec 1 2011;365(22):2078-87. [Medline].

  79. Holdaas H, Holme I, Schmieder RE, et al. Rosuvastatin in Diabetic Hemodialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. Jul 2011;22(7):1335-1341. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  80. Baseline serum cholesterol and treatment effect in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. May 20 1995;345(8960):1274-5. [Medline].

  81. Bhatt DL, Fox KA, Hacke W, Berger PB, Black HR, Boden WE, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. Apr 20 2006;354(16):1706-17. [Medline].

  82. Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, et al. Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol. Nov 1 2002;156(9):871-81. [Medline].

  83. Blumenthal RS, Michos ED. The HALTS trial--halting atherosclerosis or halted too early?. N Engl J Med. Nov 26 2009;361(22):2178-80. [Medline].

  84. Brown BG, Hillger L, Zhao XQ, Poulin D, Albers JJ. Types of change in coronary stenosis severity and their relative importance in overall progression and regression of coronary disease. Observations from the FATS Trial. Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Jan 17 1995;748:407-17; discussion 417-8. [Medline].

  85. Colhoun HM, Betteridge DJ, Durrington PN, Hitman GA, Neil HA, Livingstone SJ, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with atorvastatin in type 2 diabetes in the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS): multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. Aug 21-27 2004;364(9435):685-96. [Medline].

  86. Farmer JA, Gotto AM. Dyslipidemia and other risk factors for coronary artery disease. In: Braunwald E. Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997:1126-60.

  87. Gotto AM Jr, Farmer JA. Reducing the risk for stroke in patients with myocardial infarction: a Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) substudy. Circulation. Sep 24 2002;106(13):1595-8. [Medline].

  88. Howard BV, Rodriguez BL, Bennett PH, Harris MI, Hamman R, Kuller LH. Prevention Conference VI: Diabetes and Cardiovascular disease: Writing Group I: epidemiology. Circulation. May 7 2002;105(18):e132-7. [Medline].

  89. Kastelein JJ, Bots ML. Statin therapy with ezetimibe or niacin in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. Nov 26 2009;361(22):2180-3. [Medline].

  90. Keating GM, Robinson DM. Rosuvastatin: a review of its effect on atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(2):127-46. [Medline].

  91. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. Jan 27 2009;119(3):e21-181. [Medline].

  92. Maher VM, Brown BG, Marcovina SM, Hillger LA, Zhao XQ, Albers JJ. Effects of lowering elevated LDL cholesterol on the cardiovascular risk of lipoprotein(a). JAMA. Dec 13 1995;274(22):1771-4. [Medline].

  93. Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT). JAMA. Dec 18 2002;288(23):2998-3007. [Medline].

  94. Michael H. Merson, Robert E. Black, Anne Mills. Chronic Diseases and Risks. In: International public health: diseases, programs, systems, and policies. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006.

  95. Mills NL, Donaldson K, Hadoke PW, Boon NA, MacNee W, Cassee FR, et al. Adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. Jan 2009;6(1):36-44. [Medline].

  96. O'Keefe JH, Carter MD, Lavie CJ, Bell DS. The gravity of JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Primary Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). Postgrad Med. May 2009;121(3):113-8. [Medline].

  97. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at. Available at http://www.health.gov/paguidelines/Report/Default.aspx. Accessed 5/28/2010.

  98. Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med. Nov 5 1998;339(19):1349-57. [Medline].

  99. Ridker PM. Evaluating novel cardiovascular risk factors: can we better predict heart attacks?. Ann Intern Med. Jun 1 1999;130(11):933-7. [Medline].

  100. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, Kastelein JJ, et al. Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial. Lancet. Apr 4 2009;373(9670):1175-82. [Medline].

  101. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, Genest J, Gotto AM Jr, Kastelein JJ, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. Nov 20 2008;359(21):2195-207. [Medline].

  102. Ronner E, Boersma E, Laarman GJ, Somsen GA, Harrington RA, Deckers JW, et al. Early angioplasty in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation improves outcome but increases the need for six-month repeat revascularization: an analysis of the PURSUIT Trial. Platelet glycoprotein IIB/IIIA in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 19 2002;39(12):1924-9. [Medline].

  103. Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. Jan 14 1999;340(2):115-26. [Medline].

  104. Scanu AM, Bamba R. Niacin and lipoprotein(a): facts, uncertainties, and clinical considerations. Am J Cardiol. Apr 17 2008;101(8A):44B-47B. [Medline].

  105. Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Bollen EL, Buckley BM, Cobbe SM, et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Nov 23 2002;360(9346):1623-30. [Medline].

  106. Singh V, Deedwania P. Expanding roles for atorvastatin. Drugs Today (Barc). Jun 2008;44(6):455-71. [Medline].

  107. Taylor AJ, et al. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness. N Engl J Med. Nov 26 2009;361(22):2113-22. [Medline].

  108. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: implications for clinical practice. The WOSCOPS Study Group. Eur Heart J. Feb 1996;17(2):163-4. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Stress test, part 1. Resting ECG showing normal baseline ST segments. (See the image below for part 2.)
Stress test, part 2. Stress ECG showing significant ST-segment depression. (See the image above for part 1.)
Stress nuclear imaging showing anterior, apical, and septal wall perfusion defect during stress, which is reversible as observed on the rest images. This defect strongly suggests the presence of significant stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery.
Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography in the left panel shows severe left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. This lesion was treated with stent placement in the left anterior descending coronary artery, as observed in the right panel.
A vulnerable plaque and the mechanism of plaque rupture.
Positive and negative arterial remodeling.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.