Updated: Nov 9, 2009
Delirium tremens (DTs) is a severe manifestation of alcohol withdrawal. Pearson first described it in 1813 as an acute psychosis following abstinence from alcohol. Although it only occurs in a relatively small number of patients who undergo alcohol withdrawal, it can be fatal. DTs is a medical emergency that requires prompt recognition and treatment.
Chronic intake of alcohol affects several of the neurotransmitter systems in the brain. These effects include increased release of endogenous opiates; activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA-A) receptor and a decrease in GABA-A receptor function, with resultant influx of chloride ions; inhibition of the N -methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type of glutamate receptor, which mediates the postsynaptic excitatory effects of glutamate, with up-regulation of this receptor; and interactions with serotonin and dopamine receptors. During withdrawal from alcohol, the loss of GABA-A receptor stimulation causes a reduction in chloride flux and is associated with tremors, diaphoresis, tachycardia, anxiety, and seizures. In addition, the lack of inhibition of the NMDA receptors may lead to seizures and delirium. Excessive nervous system excitability during periods of abstinence from alcohol is related to the effect of alcohol on the number andfunction of brain receptors.
Fewer than 50% of alcohol-dependent persons develop any significant withdrawal symptoms that require pharmacological treatment upon cessation of alcohol intake. DTs, the most severe manifestation of withdrawal, occurs in 5% of patients with alcohol withdrawal.
Despite appropriate treatment, the current mortality for patients with DTs ranges from 5-15%. Mortality was as high as 35% prior to the era of intensive care and advanced pharmacotherapy. The most common conditions leading to death in these patients are respiratory failure and cardiac arrhythmias.
According to surveys among the US population, men have a higher prevalence of alcohol dependence than women. Research on gender differences among persons with alcohol dependence have found that women are more likely to deny that they have an alcohol problem and frequently minimize problems related to excessive alcohol use. Whether or not gender differences exist in the rates of development of severe alcohol withdrawal are not clear.
According to surveys, young adult males have the highest prevalence of alcohol dependence and unsafe alcohol use. Unsafe alcohol use is also common among the elderly. According to the US 2000 National Health Interview Survey, the prevalence of heavy drinking is 10% in men over 65 years of age, but only 2% among women in this age group. Among older adults presenting to emergency departments, the prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence is 10-15%.
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is the clinical syndrome that occurs when people who are physically dependent upon alcohol stop drinking or reduce their alcohol consumption. Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is divided into 4 categories.
The most objective and best validated tool to assess the severity of alcohol withdrawal is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar).[2 ]This survey consists of 10 items and can be administered rapidly at the bedside.
The 10 items include nausea and vomiting, anxiety, tremor, sweating, auditory disturbances, visual disturbances, tactile disturbances, headache, agitation, and clouding of sensorium. Zero to 7 points are assigned for each item except for the last item, which is assigned 0-4 points, with a total possible score of 67.
This scale has been demonstrated to have high reliability, reproducibility, and validity based on comparisons with ratings by experienced clinicians and has been shown to be usable in detoxication units, psychiatry units, and hospital medical/surgical wards.
The CIWA-Ar scale is intended only for patients who have been drinking recently. It relies on patients’ ability to respond to questions about their symptoms. Patients must be able to communicate and have a clear enough sensorium to reply logically because many of the items require coherent answers. The CIWA-Ar scale has not been validated in complex medical patients, postsurgical patients and critically ill patients.
A score of greater than 15 is seen in patients with moderate-to-severe alcohol withdrawal. Patients with a score greater than 15 or those who have a history of alcohol withdrawal seizures should be treated with medication upon presentation. These patients need to be monitored carefully for the development of DTs. Patients with a score of 8-15, who have mild alcohol withdrawal, should probably also receive drug treatment. Careful and frequent monitoring with the CIWA-Ar is particularly helpful in patients receiving treatment with symptom-triggered drug therapy.
Routine screening for unhealthy alcohol use in patients admitted to the hospital can detect patients who are at risk for developing alcohol withdrawal. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma mandates routine screening for unhealthy alcohol use for level one and two trauma centers. Such screening tools include AUDIT, CAGE, and AUDIT-C.
Risk factors for developing DTs include coexisting acute illness, long duration of alcohol intake, large volume of alcohol intake, severe withdrawal symptoms at presentation, prior DTs, prior seizures, prior detoxification, and intense craving for alcohol.
The signs of alcohol withdrawal in critically ill patients, especially if accompanied by delirium, may mimic those of other serious disorders, including sepsis, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, meningitis, drug toxicity, hepatic encephalopathy, hypoxia, hypoglycemia, and other metabolic disorders. These disorders may need to be excluded before a firm diagnosis of alcohol withdrawal is made.
| Acute Liver Failure | Head Trauma |
| Alcoholic Ketoacidosis | Hypoglycemia |
| Brain Abscess | Meningitis |
| Chronic Renal Failure | Opioid Abuse |
| Diabetic Ketoacidosis | Toxicity, Cocaine |
| Encephalopathy, Hepatic | Toxicity, Heroin |
| Encephalopathy, Hypertensive | Uremia |
| Encephalopathy, Uremic | Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome |
AIDS and HIV
Cerebral embolism
Cerebral hemorrhage
Cerebral tumors
Encephalitis
Hypoxia
Raised intracranial pressure
Substance intoxication and withdrawal
Toxic ingestions or exposures (eg, methanol, salicylates, ethylene glycol, carbon monoxide, anticholinergics)
Vitamin B-12 deficiency
Thyrotoxicosis
Lumbar puncture
Patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome who have had a seizure and continue to be obtunded should have a lumbar puncture if no signs of increased intracranial pressure are present.
Some patients may not have the classic signs of meningitis, such as nuchal rigidity, and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of these patients should be examined to rule out meningitis. CSF pleocytosis is often present after withdrawal seizures, even in the absence of infection or intracranial bleeding. However, CSF pleocytosis after seizures should not be attributed solely to the seizures without a search for a treatable infectious cause. Even in the absence of seizures, perform lumbar puncture if any suspicion of meningitis exists (fever, lethargy, confusion, or headache). The absence of nuchal rigidity does not reliably rule out meningitis in these patients.
Supportive therapy is an important component of the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome and delirium tremens (DTs). This includes providing a calm, quiet, well-lit environment; reassurance; ongoing reassessment; attention to fluid and electrolyte deficits; and treatment of any coexisting addictions. Commonly, these patients have coexisting medical, surgical, and psychiatric conditions that need careful diagnosis and treatment.
Although thiamine has no effect on the symptoms or signs of alcohol withdrawal or on the incidence of seizures or DTs, thiamine (100 mg PO/IV/IM qd for 3 d) is useful in preventing Wernicke encephalopathy (confusion, ataxia, ophthalmoplegia) and Korsakoff syndrome. Multivitamins (PO/IV qd) and folate (1 mg PO/IV qd) are frequently administered to these patients, but no evidence exists that vitamins, other than thiamine, have any benefit in the acute setting.
Many varying pharmacotherapeutic management recommendations exist for alcohol withdrawal and DTs. Even many authoritative textbooks and journal articles have made recommendations for use of pharmacotherapeutic agents that have never been tested in clinical trials for this condition.
Benzodiazepines are considered the drugs of choice for the management of all stages of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome, including DTs. Not only do they have a high margin of safety, but also prospective randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that benzodiazepines are very effective in treating the symptoms and signs of alcohol withdrawal and in decreasing the incidence of seizures and DTs. The longer-acting benzodiazepines, such as chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, appear to be more effective at preventing the serious complications of seizures and DTs than shorter-acting benzodiazepines such as alprazolam and oxazepam. Most experts recommend that intermittent IV bolus dosing of diazepam or lorazepam is the treatment of choice for drug therapy of DTs.
Phenobarbital, a long-acting barbiturate, has been used successfully in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal and DTs. It has well-documented anticonvulsant activity, is inexpensive, and can be administered by the oral, intramuscular, or intravenous route. However, compared with benzodiazepines, even at high doses, phenobarbital has a greater risk of respiratory depression and hypotension and has a lower overall safety profile. Therefore, only use phenobarbital as an alternative agent when benzodiazepines cannot be used or have not been effective.
An appropriate use for phenobarbital might be the situation in which agitation has not been controlled well with high doses of benzodiazepines. Then, one could administer a small dose of phenobarbital (60-120 mg) and repeat every 30 minutes until sedation occurs. For patients with refractory DTs, propofol recently has been described in case studies as effective in managing patients who are intubated.[4 ]No clinical trial has demonstrated any superiority over benzodiazepines.
Clonidine and beta-blockers have been used to treat the hyperadrenergic state of alcohol withdrawal. Although these agents may correct some of the autonomic manifestations of withdrawal, they have not been demonstrated to have any effect on seizures or DTs, and they should only be used in conjunction with benzodiazepines in the treatment of patients with alcohol withdrawal. The recommended dose for clonidine is 0.2 mg orally bid, but this dose should be individualized. The recommended dose for atenolol is 50 mg orally once per day for heart rate of 50-79 beats per minute, 100 mg once daily for heart rate greater than 80 beats per minute, and no drug is administered if heart rate is less than 50 beats per minute. The usual contraindications for clonidine and beta-blockers apply.
Carbamazepine has been shown in some clinical trials to be effective in treating patients with minor symptoms of alcohol withdrawal and has been used extensively in Europe as monotherapy. No evidence exists to indicate that carbamazepine is effective in prevention or treatment of DTs.
Drugs such as esmolol and midazolam, which have a short half-life and rapid onset of action, can be administered by continuous intravenous infusion and have been used in critically ill patients with DTs. Clinical studies have not shown them to be superior or even equal in overall effectiveness compared with longer-acting agents.
Neuroleptic drug therapy is inferior to sedative-hypnotic drug therapy in reducing mortality or the duration of severe alcohol withdrawal. Neuroleptic drugs are associated with more adverse effects, including lowering of seizure threshold, hypotension, prolonged QT interval, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. These precautions apply to the older neuroleptics. Little experience with the newer neuroleptics (atypical antipsychotics) exists in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Some authorities recommend haloperidol at a dose of 0.5-5 mg IV or IM every 30-60 minutes or the same dose orally every 4 hours for severe agitation, perceptual disturbances, or disturbed thinking not adequately controlled by high-dose benzodiazepines.
By acting on the GABA receptor, benzodiazepines produce a cross-tolerance to alcohol, thus reducing the hemodynamic and peripheral symptoms of alcohol withdrawal. The dose of benzodiazepine used should be based on the patient's symptoms and signs of alcohol withdrawal, including vital signs and amount of agitation. The longer-acting agents appear to be superior compared with the short-acting agents and may result in a smoother withdrawal course with less breakthrough and rebound symptoms, although a risk of excessive sedation exists in certain patient groups (elderly patients, patients with liver failure) with the longer-acting agents.
For the treatment of minor or moderate alcohol withdrawal (patient able to take oral therapy), symptom-triggered therapy (also known as prn therapy) has been shown in prospective, randomized, controlled trials to be superior to fixed-dose drug therapy, with less medication use and a shorter duration of therapy.[5 ]The dosage of benzodiazepine needs to be individualized for each patient. Successful use of symptom-triggered therapy requires motivated and attentive nursing.
Drug regimens and doses recommended for minor withdrawal are not appropriate for patients with DTs, who often require very high doses of these agents. For the treatment of DTs, benzodiazepines should only be administered parenterally.
For patients with severe withdrawal symptoms, including DTs, the benzodiazepine dose should be front loaded. That is, large doses should be administered intravenously at short intervals until the patient is calm but easily aroused. Then additional doses are administered only as needed. Most authorities recommend intravenous diazepam as the first choice for front-loading treatment of severe alcohol withdrawal. Because of its long serum half-life, and the even longer half-life of its active metabolite (desmethyldiazepam), additional doses may not be required once the patient is calm. Intravenous lorazepam rather than diazepam has been successfully used and may be preferable in the elderly or in those with severe liver disease.
No controlled studies show superiority of shorter-acting agents (propofol, pentobarbital, lorazepam, and midazolam) over diazepam or other long-acting benzodiazepines.
If the intravenous route is not available, then intramuscular lorazepam (or midazolam as an alternative) is recommended. Diazepam and chlordiazepoxide should not be administered intramuscularly because absorption is erratic.
The use of continuous intravenous infusions of short-acting benzodiazepines (lorazepam, midazolam) has been reported, but these infusions have required very large amounts of drug and are very expensive. No evidence indicates that continuous infusion therapy with short-acting agents leads to better outcomes than oral or intravenous intermittent bolus therapy with long-acting agents.
Patients with DTs whose conditions do not respond to high doses of benzodiazepines may respond to pentobarbital or propofol.
Depresses all levels of CNS, including limbic and reticular formation, possibly by increasing GABA activity, a major inhibitory neurotransmitter. Parenteral form usually used initially. Because of limited experience with IV chlordiazepoxide for severe alcohol withdrawal and DTs, the use of intravenous diazepam or lorazepam is preferred.
Minor withdrawal:
Symptom-triggered therapy (preferred): 50-100 mg PO q1-2h until symptoms are controlled, then prn based on symptoms
Fixed-schedule dosing (not recommended): 50 mg PO q6h for 4 doses, then 25 mg q6h for 8 doses; additional 25- to 50-mg doses prn based on symptoms
Not established
Coadministration with alcohols, phenothiazines, barbiturates, and MAOIs increases CNS toxicity
Documented hypersensitivity; narrow-angle glaucoma
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in patients receiving other CNS depressants, patients diagnosed with low albumin levels, or hepatic failure
Depresses all levels of CNS (eg, limbic and reticular formation), possibly by increasing activity of GABA.
Individualize dosage and increase cautiously to avoid adverse effects.
Minor withdrawal:
Symptom-triggered therapy (preferred): 10-20 mg PO q1-2h until symptoms controlled, then repeat prn
Fixed-schedule dosing (not recommended): 10 mg PO q6h for 4 doses, then 5 mg q6h for 8 doses; additional 5- to 10-mg doses prn based on symptoms
DTs:
10 mg IV, followed by 5 mg q5min until patient is calm but awake
Not established
Increased toxicity of benzodiazepines in CNS with coadministration of phenothiazines, barbiturates, alcohols, and MAOIs
Documented hypersensitivity; narrow-angle glaucoma
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in elderly patients (>60 y) or hepatic dysfunction, such as cirrhosis or abnormal liver function (prothrombin time >14 s or total bilirubin > 2 mg/dL) because toxicity may increase; caution in patients with renal failure because accumulation of active metabolites can occur; diazepam has a long-acting active metabolite, desmethyldiazepam, which can accumulate after repeated large doses, especially in elderly patients or those with renal insufficiency, although toxic serum levels of diazepam and its metabolite have not been reported in patients with DTs, even after very large doses of drug
Caution in severely depressed patients; be aware that diazepam can produce psychological and physical dependence; rarely, very large doses of diazepam administered IV (several hundred mg daily for several days) have been reported to result in an elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis due to accumulation of the propylene glycol component of the carrier solution; diazepam can produce thrombophlebitis when injected into small peripheral veins
Sedative hypnotic with short onset of effects and relatively long half-life. By increasing action of GABA, which is major inhibitory neurotransmitter in brain, may depress all levels of CNS, including limbic and reticular formation. When patient must be sedated for longer than 24-h period, this medication is excellent. Commonly used prophylactically to prevent DTs. Has a medium half-life. It is especially useful in elderly persons and in those with hepatic dysfunction because it does not produce active metabolites.
Minor withdrawal:
Symptom-triggered therapy (preferred): 2-4 mg PO/IV/IM q1-2h prn to control symptoms
Fixed-schedule dosing (not recommended): 2 mg PO/IV/IM q6h for 4 doses, then 1 mg q6h for 8 doses; additional 1- to 2-mg doses prn if symptoms not controlled
DTs:
1-2 mg IV q5min until patient is calm but awake
Not established
Toxicity of benzodiazepines in CNS increases when used concurrently with alcohol, phenothiazines, barbiturates, and MAOIs
Documented hypersensitivity; preexisting CNS depression; hypotension; narrow-angle glaucoma
D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
Caution in renal or hepatic impairment, myasthenia gravis, organic brain syndrome, or Parkinson disease; rarely, very large doses administered IV (several hundred mg daily for several days) have been reported to produce elevated anion gap metabolic acidosis due to the propylene glycol component
Propofol, an intravenous anesthetic agent, is active on both the glutamate and GABA-A receptors, similar to the alcohol itself, whereas benzodiazepines are active only against the GABA receptors. It may be effective for patients with DTs refractory to benzodiazepines. Due to its rapid onset of hypnosis and anticonvulsant properties, propofol is an alternative treatment for intubated patients with DTs refractory to high-dose benzodiazepines. Advantages to its use are that it is easily titratable with predictable effects and has a rapid metabolic clearance.
Phenolic compound unrelated to other types of anticonvulsants. Has general anesthetic properties when administered IV. Propofol IV produces rapid hypnosis, usually within 40 s. Effects are reversed within 30 min following discontinuation of infusion.
Bolus IV injection of 0.5 mg/kg q10s to a total dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg or by continuous infusion at 25-75 mcg/kg/min
Not established
Reduce propofol dose when administered concomitantly with benzodiazepines, opiates, phenothiazines, ethanol, and narcotics; propofol may potentiate neuromuscular blockade of vecuronium; theophylline may weaken effects of propofol, and dose increase may be needed
Documented hypersensitivity; those who are not mechanically ventilated
B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals
Do not administer with blood or blood products using the same IV catheter; patients may develop apnea; may experience a decrease in systemic vascular resistance leading to hypotension; prolonged use (>72 h) may result in hyperlipidemia (hypertriglyceridemia) due to its high lipid load; propofol-induced hypertriglyceridemia may cause pancreatitis in patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome; monitor serum triglyceride levels when propofol is used for >72 h
Chan GM, Hoffman RS, Gold JA, Whiteman PJ, Goldfrank LR, Nelson LS. Racial variations in the incidence of severe alcohol withdrawal. J Med Toxicol. Mar 2009;5(1):8-14. [Medline].
Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneiderman J, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM. Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar). Br J Addict. Nov 1989;84(11):1353-7. [Medline].
Krishel S, SaFranek D, Clark RF. Intravenous vitamins for alcoholics in the emergency department: a review. J Emerg Med. May-Jun 1998;16(3):419-24. [Medline].
McCowan C, Marik P. Refractory delirium tremens treated with propofol: a case series. Crit Care Med. Jun 2000;28(6):1781-4. [Medline].
Jaeger TM, Lohr RH, Pankratz VS. Symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in medical inpatients. Mayo Clin Proc. Jul 2001;76(7):695-701. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Weinberg JA, Magnotti LJ, Fischer PE, Edwards NM, Schroeppel T, Fabian TC, et al. Comparison of intravenous ethanol versus diazepam for alcohol withdrawal prophylaxis in the trauma ICU: results of a randomized trial. J Trauma. Jan 2008;64(1):99-104. [Medline].
[Guideline] Mayo-Smith MF, Beecher LH, Fischer TL, Gorelick DA, Guillaume JL, Hill A, et al. Management of alcohol withdrawal delirium. An evidence-based practice guideline. Arch Intern Med. Jul 12 2004;164(13):1405-12. [Medline].
Coomes TR, Smith SW. Successful use of propofol in refractory delirium tremens. Ann Emerg Med. Dec 1997;30(6):825-8. [Medline].
D'Onofrio G, Rathlev NK, Ulrich AS, Fish SS, Freedland ES. Lorazepam for the prevention of recurrent seizures related to alcohol. N Engl J Med. Mar 25 1999;340(12):915-9. [Medline].
Daeppen JB, Gache P, Landry U, Sekera E, Schweizer V, Gloor S, et al. Symptom-triggered vs fixed-schedule doses of benzodiazepine for alcohol withdrawal: a randomized treatment trial. Arch Intern Med. May 27 2002;162(10):1117-21. [Medline].
Erwin WE, Williams DB, Speir WA. Delirium tremens. South Med J. May 1998;91(5):425-32. [Medline].
Feussner JR, Linfors EW, Blessing CL, Starmer CF. Computed tomography brain scanning in alcohol withdrawal seizures. Value of the neurologic examination. Ann Intern Med. Apr 1981;94(4 pt 1):519-22. [Medline].
Gold JA, Rimal B, Nolan A, Nelson LS. A strategy of escalating doses of benzodiazepines and phenobarbital administration reduces the need for mechanical ventilation in delirium tremens. Crit Care Med. Mar 2007;35(3):724-30. [Medline].
Guthrie SK. The treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Pharmacotherapy. 1989;9(3):131-43. [Medline].
Hecksel KA, Bostwick JM, Jaeger TM, Cha SS. Inappropriate use of symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal in the general hospital. Mayo Clin Proc. Mar 2008;83(3):274-9. [Medline].
Hoey LL, Nahum A, Vance-Bryan K. A retrospective review and assessment of benzodiazepines in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal in hospitalized patients. Pharmacotherapy. Sep-Oct 1994;14(5):572-8. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Kaner EF, Beyer F, Dickinson HO, Pienaar E, Campbell F, Schlesinger C, et al. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 18 2007;CD004148. [Medline].
Kosten TR, O'Connor PG. Management of drug and alcohol withdrawal. N Engl J Med. May 1 2003;348(18):1786-95. [Medline].
Kuehn BM. Despite benefit, physicians slow to offer brief advice on harmful alcohol use. JAMA. Feb 20 2008;299(7):751-3. [Medline].
Mayo-Smith MF, Beecher LH, Fischer TL, Gorelick DA, Guillaume JL, Hill A, et al. Management of alcohol withdrawal delirium. An evidence-based practice guideline. Arch Intern Med. Jul 12 2004;164(13):1405-12. [Medline].
Moss M, Burnham EL. Alcohol abuse in the critically ill patient. Lancet. Dec 23 2006;368(9554):2231-42. [Medline].
Ntais C, Pakos E, Kyzas, P, Ioannidis JP. Benzodiazepines for alcohol withdrawal. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. July 2005;Issue 3, Article No. CD005063.
Olmedo R, Hoffman RS. Withdrawal syndromes. Emerg Med Clin North Am. May 2000;18(2):273-88. [Medline].
Poikolainen K, Alho H. Magnesium treatment in alcoholics: a randomized clinical trial. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. Jan 25 2008;3:1. [Medline].
Polycarpou A, Papanikolaou P, Ioannidis JP, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. Anticonvulsants for alcohol withdrawal. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jul 20 2005;CD005064. [Medline].
Rathlev NK, Ulrich AS, Delanty N, D'Onofrio G. Alcohol-related seizures. J Emerg Med. Aug 2006;31(2):157-63. [Medline].
Rosenbloom A. Emerging treatment options in the alcohol withdrawal syndrome. J Clin Psychiatry. Dec 1988;49 Suppl:28-32. [Medline].
Saitz R. Clinical practice. Unhealthy alcohol use. N Engl J Med. Feb 10 2005;352(6):596-607. [Medline].
Saitz R. Recognition and management of occult alcohol withdrawal. Hosp Pract (Minneap). Jun 15 1995;30(6):49-54, 56-8. [Medline].
Saitz R, O'Malley SS. Pharmacotherapies for alcohol abuse. Withdrawal and treatment. Med Clin North Am. Jul 1997;81(4):881-907. [Medline].
Stuppaeck CH, Barnas C, Hackenberg K, Miller CH, Fleischhacker WW. Carbamazepine monotherapy in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. Oct 1990;5(4):273-8. [Medline].
Thompson WL, Johnson AD, Maddrey WL. Diazepam and paraldehyde for treatment of severe delirium tremens. A controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. Feb 1975;82(2):175-80. [Medline].
Turner RC, Lichstein PR, Peden JG Jr, Busher JT, Waivers LE. Alcohol withdrawal syndromes: a review of pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. J Gen Intern Med. Sep-Oct 1989;4(5):432-44. [Medline].
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician's guide, December 2007 Update. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (www.niaaa.nih.gov/guide). Available at http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/Practitioner/CliniciansGuide2005/PrescribingMeds.pdf. Accessed April 29, 2008.
delirium tremens, DTs, severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome, alcohol withdrawal, alcoholism, acute psychosis, chronic intake of alcohol, withdrawal seizures, hallucinations, Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol
Michael James Burns, MD, FACEP, FACP, Health Science Clinical Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California Irvine School of Medicine
Michael James Burns, MD, FACEP, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, California Medical Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Phi Beta Kappa, Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
James B Price, MD, Attending Emergency Physician, Mission Hospital; Clinical Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
James B Price, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha and American College of Emergency Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Michael E Lekawa, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine; Chief, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Director of Trauma Services, Director of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Director of Student Critical Care Teaching Program, Medical Director of Surgery Clinics, University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Michael E Lekawa, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Surgeons, and Society of Critical Care Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Lisa Kirkland, MD, FACP, CNSP, MSHA, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic; ANW Intensivists, Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Lisa Kirkland, MD, FACP, CNSP, MSHA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of Hospital Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment
Harold L Manning, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Physiology, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School
Harold L Manning, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and American Thoracic Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Timothy D Rice, MD, Associate Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine
Timothy D Rice, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, FCCP, FCCM, Professor of Critical Care Medicine, Bioengineering, Cardiovascular Disease and Anesthesiology, Vice-Chair, Academic Affairs, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, FCCP, FCCM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Critical Care Medicine, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, Association of University Anesthetists, Shock Society, and Society of Critical Care Medicine
Disclosure: LiDCO Ltd Honoraria Consulting; iNTELOMED Intellectual property rights Board membership; Edwards Lifesciences Honoraria Consulting; Applied Physiology, Ltd Honoraria Consulting; Cheetah Medical Consulting fee Consulting
Clinical guidelines
Mayo-Smith MF, Beecher LH, Fischer TL, Gorelick DA, Guillaume JL, Hill A, Jara G, Kasser C, Melbourne J. Management of alcohol withdrawal delirium. An evidence-based practice guideline. Arch Intern Med 2004 Jul 12;164(13):1405-12.[ 7 ]
Physical detoxification services for withdrawal from specific substances. In: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). Detoxification and substance abuse treatment. Rockville (MD): Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA); 2006 Jan 18. p. 41-111. (Treatment improvement protocol (TIP); no. 45).
© 1994-
by Medscape.
All Rights Reserved
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)