Toxic Shock Syndrome Treatment & Management

  • Author: Ramesh Venkataraman, MBBS; Chief Editor: Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, FCCP, FCCM   more...
 
Updated: Jul 16, 2010
 

Medical Care

TSS has a rapid, dramatic, and fulminant onset. Quick recognition of the syndrome is important for enabling appropriate and prompt treatment. S pyogenes continues to be susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics. Although very effective in treating pharyngitis and other superficial infections, aggressive GAS infections do not respond well to penicillin and continue to be associated with high mortality rates and extensive morbidity.

The principles in the management of septic shock in general must be instituted as soon as possible (see Septic Shock). These include the following components:

  1. Early recognition
  2. Early and adequate antibiotic therapy
  3. Source control and early debridement of infected/necrotic wounds
  4. Early hemodynamic resuscitation and continued support
  5. Corticosteroids (refractory vasopressor-dependent shock)
  6. Drotrecogin alpha (Severely ill if APACHE II > 25) within 24 hours of onset of first organ dysfunction
  7. Tight glycemic control (Glucose target of < 180 mg/dL are considered to be adequate based on present data.)
  8. Proper ventilator management with low tidal volume in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with maintenance of plateau pressures of less than 30 cm of water.
  • In experimental models of S pyogenes infection, penicillin proved to be inferior to clindamycin. The physiologic state of the organism attributed to the inoculum effects is suggested as the mechanism of failure.
    • Penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics are most efficacious against rapidly growing bacteria; therefore, these antibiotics have the greatest efficacy when organisms are growing rapidly during the early stages of infection or in mild infections. When higher concentrations of GAS accumulate (eg, deep-seeded infections), the effectiveness of beta-lactam antibiotics decreases because the bacterial growth slows (stationary phase).
    • Penicillin mediates its antibacterial action against GAS by interacting with penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Experimentally, the binding of penicillin has been shown to decrease in stationary cells, related to cells in the logarithmic growth phase; thus, the loss of certain PBPs during the stationary growth phase may be secondary to the inoculum effect and may account for penicillin failure.
  • Clindamycin
    • This drug has multiple effects against GAS infection.
    • The efficacy of clindamycin is not affected by inoculum size or growth stage; furthermore, this agent is a potent suppressor of bacterial toxin synthesis.
    • Clindamycin facilitates phagocytosis of S pyogenes by inhibiting M protein synthesis.
    • Clindamycin suppresses synthesis of PBPs, which also are enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis.
    • Clindamycin has a longer postantibiotic effect than penicillin.
    • Clindamycin causes suppression of lipopolysaccharide-induced monocyte synthesis of TNF.[14]
  • Recommended antibiotic therapy
    • For patients with GAS infection, the administration of clindamycin (600 mg -900 mg IV q8h) is recommended. Other clinicians recommend combined therapy, in which penicillin G (4 million U IV q4h) is combined with clindamycin.
    • Because differentiating between STSS and streptococcal TSS on clinical grounds alone is difficult, intravenous penicillin also should be administered in addition to a beta-lactamase resistant antibiotic until a bacteriologic diagnosis is confirmed by culture. Alternatively, a first-generation cephalosporin or vancomycin can be used.
  • Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome
    • Large doses of a beta-lactamase–resistant, antistaphylococcal, antimicrobial agent should be administered intravenously to patients with staphylococcal infections. The usually prescribed antibiotics are nafcillin, oxacillin, and first generation cephalosporin. Nafcillin or oxacillin (2 g q4h) is generally recommended. Vancomycin can be used in penicillin-allergic patients.
    • These agents have been known to increase TSST-1 in culture possibly by cell lysis. Therefore, clindamycin may be used in combination for the first few days to reduce synthesis of TSST-1.
    • The antibiotic treatment is continued for 10 to 14 days in absence of a complication.
  • Intravenous fluids
    • TSS causes intractable hypotension and diffuse capillary leak; therefore, massive amounts of intravenous fluids (10-15 L/d) often are necessary. Patients in shock may require central venous monitoring or right heart catheterization to guide fluid management.
    • The patient's blood pressure may improve with administration of fluids alone; otherwise, vasopressors (eg, dopamine) or even more potent vasoconstrictors (eg, norepinephrine) are required. Norepinephrine with or without dobutamine may be more effective than high-dose dopamine or epinephrine to preserve splanchnic perfusion.
    • Patients with TSS will require supportive measures, including intubation and mechanical ventilation, dialysis in patients who have developed renal failure, and adequate nutritional support.
  • Other treatment measures
    • Intravenous immunoglobulin: Several anecdotal reports, 1 large series of 21 patients and a case control study, reported lower mortality rates for patients with Streptococcal TSS treated with intravenous immunoglobulins.[11, 15, 16] Intravenous immunoglobulins also have been reported to be beneficial in severe cases of Staphylococcal TSS. A single dose of IVIG (400 mg/kg), generates protective levels of antibody to TSST-1 that persist for week. The recommended initial dosage is 2 g/kg, followed by 0.4 g/kg for as long as 5 days. The mechanism responsible for the efficacy of gamma-globulin therapy may be neutralization of the circulating toxins, inhabitation of TNF-alpha production via nonspecific inhabitation of monocyte or T-cell activation, or inhibition of other streptococcal virulence factors. The contraindications include a history of anaphylaxis from immune globulin in past, immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency, and circulating anti-IgA antibodies.A recent case series described 7 patients with severe soft tissue infection caused by GAS and toxic shock syndrome. All were treated with effective antimicrobials and high-dose intravenous immune serum globulin (IVIG). Surgery was either not performed or only limited exploration was carried out. Six of the patients had toxic shock syndrome. The study suggests that the use of a medical regimen including IVIG in patients with severe GAS soft tissue infections may allow a minimally invasive approach. This can limit the need to perform immediate wide debridements and amputations in unstable patients.[17] Another prospective, randomized, controlled study included patients with severe sepsis and septic shock of intra-abdominal origin admitted to the ICU. Polyvalent IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (Ig) (Pentaglobin; IVIG group) at a dosage of 7 mL/kg/day for 5 days or an equal amount of 5% human albumin (control group) was randomized. Fifty-six patients were enrolled. The overall mortality rate was 37.5%. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mortality rate was reduced from 48.1% in patients treated with antibiotic plus albumin to 27.5% for patients with antibiotic plus IVIG. IVIG administration in combination with adequate antibiotics improved the survival of surgical ICU patients with intra-abdominal sepsis.[18]
    • Hyperbaric oxygen has been used anecdotally in few patients, but whether this treatment is useful is not clear.
    • High-dose corticosteroid therapy has not been shown to be beneficial; Stress dose steroids (hydrocortisone 50 mg IV every 6 hours) should be considered in patients with refractory shock despite adequate antimicrobial theory and source control.
    • In recent years, research is continuing to develop either monoclonal antibodies against TSST-1 or other peptides to block the ability of bacterial toxins to activate T cells, therefore blocking the toxicity cascade. Most of this research presently is focused on in vitro and animal models of toxic shock.
Next

Surgical Care

Prompt, aggressive exploration and debridement of patients thought to have deep-seeded pyogenic infection constitutes a surgical emergency. Surgical exploration through a small incision with visualization of the muscle and fascia may provide an early and definitive diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. Infection often is more extensive than is apparent from external examination. Surgical debridement of infected tissue is extremely important and often requires re-exploration to ensure adequacy of resection.

Previous
Next

Consultations

  • Consultation with a surgeon should occur early.
  • A consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is mandatory, and a consultation with an intensivist also is required for management of these patients in an intensive care unit.
Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ramesh Venkataraman, MBBS  Consultant, Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, India

Ramesh Venkataraman, MBBS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, Indian Medical Association, and Society of Critical Care Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC  Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St Boniface General Hospital

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Thoracic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal Society of Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and World Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Cory Franklin, MD  Professor, Department of Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science; Director, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cook County Hospital

Cory Franklin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: New York Academy of Sciences and Society of Critical Care Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

Richard B Brown, MD, FACP  Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baystate Medical Center; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine

Richard B Brown, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD  Clinical and Research Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital

Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Society for Microbiology, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, FCCP, FCCM  Professor of Critical Care Medicine, Bioengineering, Cardiovascular Disease and Anesthesiology, Vice-Chair, Academic Affairs, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Michael R Pinsky, MD, CM, FCCP, FCCM is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Critical Care Medicine, American Heart Association, American Thoracic Society, Association of University Anesthetists, Shock Society, and Society of Critical Care Medicine

Disclosure: LiDCO Ltd Honoraria Consulting; iNTELOMED Intellectual property rights Board membership; Edwards Lifesciences Honoraria Consulting; Applied Physiology, Ltd Honoraria Consulting; Cheetah Medical Consulting fee Consulting

References
  1. Todd J, Fishaut M, Kapral F. Toxic-shock syndrome associated with phage-group-I Staphylococci. Lancet. Nov 25 1978;2(8100):1116-8. [Medline].

  2. Shands KN, Schmid GP, Dan BB. Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: association with tampon use and Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features in 52 cases. N Engl J Med. Dec 18 1980;303(25):1436-42. [Medline].

  3. Davis JP, Chesney PJ, Wand PJ. Toxic-shock syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention. N Engl J Med. Dec 18 1980;303(25):1429-35. [Medline].

  4. Ellies E, Vallée F, Mari A, Silva S, Bauriaud R, Fourcade O, et al. [Toxic shock syndrome consecutive to the presence of vaginal tampon for menstruation regressive after early haemodynamic optimization and activated protein C infusion]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. Jan 2009;28(1):91-5. [Medline].

  5. Cone LA, Woodard DR, Schlievert PM. Clinical and bacteriologic observations of a toxic shock-like syndrome due to Streptococcus pyogenes. N Engl J Med. Jul 16 1987;317(3):146-9. [Medline].

  6. Stevens DL, Tanner MH, Winship J. Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a toxic shock- like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N Engl J Med. Jul 6 1989;321(1):1-7. [Medline].

  7. Lappin E, Ferguson AJ. Gram-positive toxic shock syndromes. Lancet Infect Dis. May 2009;9(5):281-90. [Medline].

  8. Davies HD, McGeer A, Schwartz B. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group. N Engl J Med. Aug 22 1996;335(8):547-54. [Medline].

  9. Eriksson BK, Andersson J, Holm SE. Epidemiological and clinical aspects of invasive group A streptococcal infections and the streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1998;27(6):1428-36. [Medline].

  10. Stevens DL. Invasive group A streptococcus infections. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 1992;14(1):2-11. [Medline].

  11. Demers B, Simor AE, Vellend H. Severe invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada: 1987-1991. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1993;16(6):792-800; discussion 801-2. [Medline].

  12. Matsuda Y, Kato H, Ono E, Kikuchi K, Muraoka M, Takagi K, et al. Diagnosis of toxic shock syndrome by two different systems; clinical criteria and monitoring of TSST-1-reactive T cells. Microbiol Immunol. Nov 2008;52(11):513-21. [Medline].

  13. Park JS, Kim JS, Yi J, Kim EC. [Production and characterization of anti-staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 monoclonal antibody]. Korean J Lab Med. Dec 2008;28(6):449-56. [Medline].

  14. Kalyan S, Chow AW. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 induces the translocation and secretion of high mobility group-1 protein from both activated T cells and monocytes. Mediators Inflamm. 2008;2008:512196. [Medline].

  15. Kaul R, McGeer A, Norrby-Teglund A. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for streptococcal toxic shock syndrome--a comparative observational study. The Canadian Streptococcal Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. Apr 1999;28(4):800-7. [Medline].

  16. Stevens DL. The flesh-eating bacterium: what's next?. J Infect Dis. Mar 1999;179 Suppl 2:S366-74. [Medline].

  17. Norrby-Teglund A, Muller MP, Mcgeer A. Successful management of severe group A streptococcal soft tissue infections using an aggressive medical regimen including intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin together with a conservative surgical approach. Scand J Infect Dis. 2005;37(3):166-72. [Medline].

  18. Rodríguez A, Rello J, Neira J, Maskin B, Ceraso D, Vasta L. Effects of high-dose of intravenous immunoglobulin and antibiotics on survival for severe sepsis undergoing surgery. Shock. Apr 2005;23(4):298-304. [Medline].

  19. Anderson JF, Cunha BA. Group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis of the psoas muscle. Heart Lung. May-Jun 1999;28(3):219-21. [Medline].

  20. Bachmeyer C, Langman B, Blum L. Fulminant streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis. Dermatology. 2004;209(4):346-7; author reply 347.

  21. Barry W, Hudgins L, Donta ST. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for toxic shock syndrome. JAMA. Jun 24 1992;267(24):3315-6. [Medline].

  22. Bisno AL. Group A streptococcal infections and acute rheumatic fever. N Engl J Med. Sep 12 1991;325(11):783-93. [Medline].

  23. Bisno AL, Stevens DL. Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues. N Engl J Med. Jan 25 1996;334(4):240-5. [Medline].

  24. Cronin L, Cook DJ, Carlet J. Corticosteroid treatment for sepsis: a critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. Aug 1995;23(8):1430-9. [Medline].

  25. Ekelund K, Skinhøj P, Madsen J. Reemergence of emm1 and a changed superantigen profile for group A streptococci causing invasive infections: results from a nationwide study. J Clin Microbiol. Apr 2005;43(4):1789-96.

  26. Hribalova V. Streptococcus pyogenes and the toxic shock syndrome. Ann Intern Med. May 1988;108(5):772. [Medline].

  27. Issa NC, Thompson RL. Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome. Suspicion and prevention are keys to control. Postgrad Med. Oct 2001;110(4):55-6, 59-62. [Medline].

  28. Kaul R, McGeer A, Low DE. Population-based surveillance for group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis: Clinical features, prognostic indicators, and microbiologic analysis of seventy-seven cases. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study. Am J Med. Jul 1997;103(1):18-24. [Medline].

  29. Lee YT, Chou TD, Peng MY. Rapidly progressive necrotizing fasciitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. Oct 2005;38(5):361-4.

  30. Lina G, Vandenesch F, Etienne J. [Staphylococcal and streptococcal pediatric toxic syndrome from 1998 to 2000. Data from the National Center for Staphylococcal Toxemia]. Arch Pediatr. Sep 2001;8 Suppl 4:769s-775s. [Medline].

  31. Martin PR, Hoiby EA. Streptococcal serogroup A epidemic in Norway 1987-1988. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990;22(4):421-9. [Medline].

  32. Mascini EM, Jansze M, Schouls LM. Penicillin and clindamycin differentially inhibit the production of pyrogenic exotoxins A and B by group A streptococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents. Oct 2001;18(4):395-8. [Medline].

  33. Mulla ZD. Treatment options in the management of necrotising fasciitis caused by Group A Streptococcus. Expert Opin Pharmacother. Aug 2004;5(8):1695-700.

  34. Norrby-Teglund A, Newton D, Kotb M. Superantigenic properties of the group A streptococcal exotoxin SpeF (MF). Infect Immun. Dec 1994;62(12):5227-33. [Medline].

  35. Schumann C, Triantafilou K, Kamenz J. Septic shock caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in a post-splenectomy patient successfully treated with recombinant human activated protein C. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(2):139-42.

  36. Schwartz B, Facklam RR, Breiman RF. Changing epidemiology of group A streptococcal infection in the USA. Lancet. Nov 10 1990;336(8724):1167-71. [Medline].

  37. Sims KD, Barton TD. Group B streptococcal toxic shock syndrome in an asplenic patient: case report and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Mar 2006;25(3):208-10.

  38. Stegmayr B, Bjorck S, Holm S. Septic shock induced by group A streptococcal infection: clinical and therapeutic aspects. Scand J Infect Dis. 1992;24(5):589-97. [Medline].

  39. Stevens DL, Bryant AE, Hackett SP. Antibiotic effects on bacterial viability, toxin production, and host response. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 1995;20 Suppl 2:S154-7. [Medline].

  40. Stevens DL, Bryant AE, Hackett SP. Group A streptococcal bacteremia: the role of tumor necrosis factor in shock and organ failure. J Infect Dis. Mar 1996;173(3):619-26. [Medline].

  41. Tang J, Wang C, Feng Y. Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome Caused by Streptococcus suis Serotype 2. PLoS Med. Apr 11 2006;3(5):e151.

  42. Thomas JC, Carr SJ, Fujioka K. Community-acquired group A streptococcal deaths in Los Angeles County. J Infect Dis. Dec 1989;160(6):1086-7. [Medline].

  43. Weiss KA, Laverdiere M. Group A Streptococcus invasive infections: a review. Can J Surg. Feb 1997;40(1):18-25. [Medline].

  44. Wheeler MC, Roe MH, Kaplan EL. Outbreak of group A streptococcus septicemia in children. Clinical, epidemiologic, and microbiological correlates. JAMA. Jul 24-31 1991;266(4):533-7. [Medline].

  45. Working Group on Severe Streptococcal Infections. Defining the group A streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Rationale and consensus definition. The Working Group on Severe Streptococcal Infections. JAMA. Jan 20 1993;269(3):390-1. [Medline].

  46. Yan S, Mendelman PM, Stevens DL. The in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftriaxone against Streptococcus pyogenes is unrelated to penicillin-binding protein 4. FEMS Microbiol Lett. Jul 1 1993;110(3):313-7. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Description of M proteins and streptococcal toxins.
Group A streptococci cause beta hemolysis on blood agar.
Group A streptococci on Gram stain of blood isolated from a patient who developed toxic shock syndrome. Courtesy of T. Matthews.
This schematic shows interaction among T-cell receptor, superantigen, and class II major histocompatability complex. The binding of superantigen to class II molecules and T-cell receptors is not limited by antigen specificity and lies outside the normal antigen binding sites.
Progression of soft tissue swelling to vesicle or bullous formation is an ominous sign and suggests streptococcal shock syndrome. Courtesy of S. Manocha.
A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The leg was incised to exclude underlying necrotizing infection. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.
A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. This patient also had streptococcal pharyngitis. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.
A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.
A 46-year-old man presented with nonnecrotizing cellulitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. The patient had diffuse erythroderma, a characteristic feature of the syndrome. The patient improved with antibiotics and intravenous gammaglobulin therapy. Several days later, a characteristic desquamation of the skin occurred over palms and soles. Courtesy of Rob Green, MD.
A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.
A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.
A 58-year-old patient presented in septic shock. On physical examination, progressive swelling of the right groin was observed. On exploration, necrotizing cellulitis, but not fasciitis, was present. The cultures grew group A streptococci. The patient developed severe shock (toxic shock syndrome). The CT scanning helped evaluate the extent of infection and exclude other pathologies, such as psoas abscess, osteomyelitis, and inguinal hernia.
Necrotizing cellulitis of toxic shock syndrome.
Soft tissue infection secondary to group A streptococci, leading to toxic shock syndrome.
Extensive debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand.
The hand is healing following aggressive surgical debridement of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand (see Image 15).
Necrosis of the little toe of the right foot and cellulitis of the foot secondary to group A streptococci.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.