Colonic Polyps Workup
- Author: Gregory H Enders, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: BS Anand, MD more...
No laboratory test can determine definitively whether a given patient has a colonic polyp. A stool occult blood test can detect a fraction (20-40%) of colonic polyps that are larger than 10 mm in diameter but, it may also indicate other causes of gastrointestinal blood loss.
Anemia is not specific for colonic polyps but can be an indication of their presence.
A patient with a family history of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) may inherit a mutation in the APC gene. A blood test may detect this heterozygous state. In addition, because most APC mutations involve truncations of the protein, an in vitro protein truncation assay has been developed by Powell et al. This assay amplifies segments of APC messenger RNA (mRNA) and expresses the protein parts in vitro to readily detect the truncated products. A positive test finding only indicates susceptibility, not the actual presence of a colonic polyp.
Genetic testing of blood samples can also detect most cases of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)/Lynch syndrome. Despite the name, patients with HNPCC have multiple polyps but much fewer than that in patients with APC syndrome.
Air contrast barium enema
An air contrast barium enema study can detect larger colonic polyps, but it can also miss smaller ones. This imaging modality has a low false-positive rate. In one study, air contrast barium enema detected only about 50% of colonic polyps larger than 1 cm in diameter.
Virtual colonoscopy is performed by computed tomography (CT) scanning (or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and it has shown promise in research studies, detecting more than 80% of large polyps. In a large, multicenter trial, however, a disappointing sensitivity of only 55% was obtained for colonic polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter. Another trial found a detection rate for CT scanning that was comparable to colonoscopy, although some methodological issues have been raised regarding this study.
Virtual colonoscopy is beginning to be performed for screening outside of research settings on limited numbers of patients. Relatively recent data from such screening procedures suggest that virtual colonoscopy results in the detection of far fewer polyps that are smaller than 1 centimeter in diameter than standard optical colonoscopy. Most small polyps have very benign characteristics at the time of removal and may be clinically insignificant. However, some are presumably precursors to advanced polyps. Therefore, their clinical significance, particularly for screening intervals, needs better definition.
The main drawback of virtual colonoscopy is that a second procedure, an optical colonoscopy, is required to remove the detected colonic polyps. Whether the radiation exposure from CT scanning may be significant is debated.[9, 10]
In most methods, a thorough colon preparation is required. Methods are under development to label stool with barium meals, obviating the need for cathartic bowel prep.
Adequate bowel cleansing is necessary prior to many procedures.
Several preparations are marketed for bowel cleansing (eg, polyethylene glycol 3350 [GoLYTELY, NuLYTELY, HalfLYTELY], magnesium citrate [Citroma], senna [X-Prep]) in preparing patients for gastrointestinal procedures, such as colonoscopy and barium x-ray studies. More recent experience suggests that splitting the preparation in half, with one portion taken the day before the procedure and the second portion taken early on the day of the procedure (eg, completed at least 4-6 h before the procedure) yields more effective cleansing of the right colon.
Bowel cleansing preparations may be used with various dietary preparations (eg, clear liquid diet the day before surgery or procedure) and are convenient to administer on an outpatient basis. Nonetheless, distaste for or discomfort from the preparation remains a complaint of some patients.
Colonoscopy is the preferred test to detect colonic polyps, obtain biopsies, and/or perform endoscopic resection of polyps. Sensitivities for large colonic polyps in the 80-90% range have been reported.
Although flexible sigmoidoscopy and stool tests for occult blood have been the mainstays of screening to prevent colon cancer, some clinicians now favor colonoscopy as a primary screening tool. Colonoscopy is the preferred tool in patients with defined polyposis or colorectal-cancer syndromes or in patients with a marked family history of colorectal cancer.
Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a good screening test and the only procedure or imaging modality to be validated by studies that document a decrease in colorectal cancer mortality. However, this procedure does not examine the entire colon. Studies indicate that the majority of large adenomatous polyps in women will be missed by using flexible sigmoidoscopy alone.
Screening is usually begun at age 50 years in patients who are at average risk.
Randomized controlled trials have documented a reduction in mortality from colon cancer in populations screened by flexible sigmoidoscopy. However, studies suggest that about 40% of high-risk proximal adenomas remain undetected when this procedure is used as the primary screening modality.
An ingestible, camera-equipped capsule developed as a means of exploring the gastrointestinal tract was approved by the FDA in 2014 for the detection of colon polyps in patents who have had an incomplete optical colonoscopy. The device, a 12 mm ̶ by ̶ 33 mm capsule equipped with 2 miniature color video cameras, transmits images for approximately 10 hours. A study by Hagel et al demonstrated that the capsule had an 81.5% accuracy in detecting polyp carriers (per-patient analysis).[11, 12]
This procedure is currently not endorsed for colon polyp screening. Van Gossum et al compared the efficacy of this device with that of a colonoscope in the detection of colorectal polyps, advanced adenomas, and cancer. In a study of 328 patients with known or suspected colonic disease, the authors found that capsule endoscopy had a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 84%, respectively, for the detection of polyps that were 6 mm or more in size. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of advanced adenomas were 73% and 79%, respectively. Capsule endoscopy detected 14 of 19 cancers that had been found using colonoscopy.
The investigators also determined that in patients with good or excellent colon cleanliness, capsule endoscopy's sensitivity was higher for all lesions than it was in individuals whose colon cleanliness was fair or poor. Van Gossum and colleagues concluded that in comparison with colonoscopy, capsule endoscopy has a low sensitivity for the detection of colonic lesions.
Stool DNA studies
Tests have been developed that detect mutant, fragmented, and/or methylated DNA from exfoliated colon tumor cells in stool. These tests have shown the ability to detect a substantial fraction of tumors in clinical trials but are expensive and appear to be less sensitive than colonoscopy.
Histologic Findings and Staging
Adenomatous polyps are of 3 different histological types, as follows: tubular, villous, and tubulovillous. Adenomatous polyps may show changes of dysplasia, which distinguish them from hyperplastic polyps. The most common benign polyp is hyperplastic.
Colonic polyps are typically benign. Colonic polyps that contain high-grade dysplasia or microinvasive cancer confined to the mucosa are often termed carcinoma in situ.
Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Lammersdorf K, et al. Chromoscopy-guided endomicroscopy increases the diagnostic yield of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007 Mar. 132(3):874-82. [Medline].
Spring KJ, Zhao ZZ, Karamatic R, et al. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov. 131(5):1400-7. [Medline].
Ferlitsch M, Reinhart K, Pramhas S, et al. Sex-specific prevalence of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and colorectal cancer in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. JAMA. 2011 Sep 28. 306(12):1352-8. [Medline].
Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology. 1987 Nov. 93(5):1009-13. [Medline].
Powell SM. Direct analysis for familial adenomatous polyposis mutations. Mol Biotechnol. 2002 Feb. 20(2):197-207. [Medline].
Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 4. 357(14):1403-12. [Medline].
Benson M, Dureja P, Gopal D, Reichelderfer M, Pfau PR. A Comparison of Optical Colonoscopy and CT Colonography Screening Strategies in the Detection and Recovery of Subcentimeter Adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec. 105(12):2578-85. [Medline].
Shah JP, Hynan LS, Rockey DC. Management of small polyps detected by screening CT colonography: patient and physician preferences. Am J Med. 2009 Jul. 122(7):687.e1-9. [Medline].
Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2009 Sep. 58(9):1242-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
FDA Clears Colon Camera Pill. Medscape. Feb 3 2014. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/820087. Accessed: Feb 11 2014.
Hagel AF, Gabele E, Raithel M, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy: Detection of colonic polyps compared with conventional colonoscopy and visualization of extracolonic pathologies. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb. 28(2):77-82. [Medline].
Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I, et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 16. 361(3):264-70. [Medline].
Itzkowitz SH, Jandorf L, Brand R, et al. Improved fecal DNA test for colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan. 5(1):111-7. [Medline].
Heresbach D, Chauvin P, Hess-Migliorretti A, Riou F, Grolier J, Josselin JM. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun. 22(6):716-23. [Medline].
Zafar A, Mustafa M, Chapman M. Colorectal polyps: when should we tattoo?. Surg Endosc. 2012 Nov. 26(11):3264-6. [Medline].
Beach R, Chan AO, Wu TT, et al. BRAF mutations in aberrant crypt foci and hyperplastic polyposis. Am J Pathol. 2005 Apr. 166(4):1069-75. [Medline].
Burke CA, Choure AG, Sanaka MR, Lopez R. A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jun. 55(6):1716-20. [Medline].
Bussey HJ, DeCosse JJ, Deschner EE, et al. A randomized trial of ascorbic acid in polyposis coli. Cancer. 1982 Oct 1. 50(7):1434-9. [Medline].
Cohen LB. A color atlas of colorectal lesions. Pazdur R, Hoskins WJ, Wagman L, Coia LR, eds. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Huntington, NY: Publisher Research & Representation, Inc; 2000. 301-305.
Coia LR, Ellenhorn JDI, Ayoub JP. Colorectal and anal cancers. Pazdur R, Hoskins WJ, Wagman L, Coia LR, eds. Cancer Management: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Huntington, NY: Publisher Research & Representation, Inc; 2000. 273-299.
Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Tumors of the small and large intestines. Cotran R, Kumar V, Robbins S, eds. Pathologic Basis of Disease. 5th ed. Huntington, NY: WB Saunders Company; 1994. 809-822.
Giardiello FM, Offerhaus GJ, DuBois RN. The role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer. 1995 Jul-Aug. 31A(7-8):1071-6. [Medline].
Itzkowitz SH, Kim YS. Colonic polyps and polyposis syndromes. Feldman M, Sleisenger MH, Scharschmidt BF, eds. Sleisinger & Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease; Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Company; 1998. Vol 2: 1865-1905.
Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996 Oct 18. 87(2):159-70. [Medline].
Ladabaum U, Song K. Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology. 2005 Oct. 129(4):1151-62. [Medline].
Logan RF, Grainge MJ, Shepherd VC, et al. Aspirin and folic acid for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2008 Jan. 134(1):29-38. [Medline].
Powell SM, Petersen GM, Krush AJ, et al. Molecular diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 30. 329(27):1982-7. [Medline].
Regueiro CR. AGA future trends committee report. Colorectal cancer: a qualitative review of emerging screening and diagnostic technologies. Gastroenterology. 2005 Sep. 129(3):1083-103. [Medline].
Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006 May. 130(6):1865-71. [Medline].
Swan MP, Bourke MJ, Alexander S, Moss A, Williams SJ. Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec. 70(6):1128-36. [Medline].
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006 May. 130(6):1872-85. [Medline].