Colonic Obstruction Follow-up

  • Author: Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS; Chief Editor: Julian Katz, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jun 27, 2011
 

Further Inpatient Care

  • Resuscitation
  • Anatomic and, if possible, pathological characterization of the cause of the obstruction
  • Bowel cleansing if the obstruction is incomplete
  • Surgical relief of the obstruction
  • Dictated by the demands of postoperative convalescence
Next

Further Outpatient Care

Care after discharge focuses on surgical convalescence and, if relevant, the need to care for the disease that caused the obstruction. An obstructing colon cancer may require postoperative chemotherapy, depending on the stage of the disease. The patient who is chronically obstipated may need stool softeners.

If the patient has received a colostomy or ileostomy, a decision regarding whether it is temporary or permanent may have been made at the time of discharge, depending on the patient's diagnosis, comorbidity, and postoperative convalescence.

Most patients who retain a rectum are, at least in principle, candidates for reanastomosis at a subsequent stage. Generally, it is performed 2-3 months after the initial operation. Careful counseling and assessment are required before proceeding with the second procedure.

Counseling is directed at the risks of the second procedure because the patient must understand that this surgery is elective and that a colostomy or ileostomy is compatible with a reasonable lifestyle. Often, local ostomy support groups and meeting with other patients with ostomies are helpful at this time.

Patients who had stool incontinence before their first operation, those with substantial surgical risks, and patients with decreased mental status who are cared for in nursing homes may potentially be better off without a reanastomosis.

In addition, the remaining colon, both proximally and distally, must be evaluated radiographically or endoscopically to rule out synchronous colonic lesions, such as neoplasms, because the presence of the large bowel obstruction prevented this from being performed before the first procedure.

Previous
Next

Inpatient & Outpatient Medications

  • Pain medicines generally should be avoided preoperatively. If the pain is sufficiently severe to merit use of significant analgesics, peritonitis, rather than large bowel obstruction, should be considered as the first diagnosis.
  • Oral laxatives are contraindicated in patients with complete large bowel obstruction.
  • A slow preoperative mechanical bowel preparation is indicated for patients who have incomplete obstruction, provided the patient can tolerate it.
  • The author's preference is for polyethylene glycol solutions, such as GO-LYTELY, because they avoid issues of fluid and electrolyte imbalance. The fluid should be administered slowly (rather than given in the standard manner of 1 gal over 4 h), and the patient should be observed for abdominal cramping and intolerance.
Previous
Next

Transfer

  • Transfer to another facility is indicated if adequate surgical management or backup is not available.
  • Prior to transfer, the patient should be adequately hydrated and resuscitated.
Previous
Next

Deterrence/Prevention

  • Patients with an endoscopically reduced sigmoid volvulus should be offered elective surgical procedures, including sigmoid resection or fixation, because of the high risk of recurrence.
  • Aggressive screening for colorectal cancer in individuals who are older than 50 years or who have a strong family history of colorectal cancer, as indicated by current guidelines, should reduce the future incidence of malignant colonic obstruction.
Previous
Next

Complications

  • Peritonitis from bowel perforation secondary to overstrenuous attempts at reduction of volvulus or intussusception or injudicious attempts to dilate or stent an unsuitable colonic obstruction
  • Misdiagnosis of an ileus secondary to intra-abdominal infection as large bowel obstruction, with consequent delay in treatment
  • Intra-abdominal abscess from anastomotic leakage
  • Pneumonia from aspiration during emesis
  • Dehydration
  • Electrolyte disturbance
Previous
Next

Prognosis

  • Prior to surgical decompression, the patient's overall medical condition and presence of any comorbidities that define surgical risk determine the prognosis.
  • After surgical decompression, prognosis is determined by the underlying disease.
Previous
Next

Patient Education

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS  Professor, Chair, Department of Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Development in Research, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Gastroenterological Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Juan B Ochoa, MD  Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh; Medical and Scientific Director, HCN, Nestle Healthcare Nutrition

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

BS Anand, MD  Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine

BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP  Senior Associate Dean for Undergraduate Medical Education, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, and Society of General Internal Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Julian Katz, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine

Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Nagata K, Ota Y, Okawa T, et al. PET/CT colonography for the preoperative evaluation of the colon proximal to the obstructive colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. Jun 2008;51(6):882-90. [Medline].

  2. Small AJ, Baron TH. Comparison of Wallstent and Ultraflex stents for palliation of malignant left-sided colon obstruction: a retrospective, case-matched analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 2008;67(3):478-88. [Medline].

  3. van Hooft JE, Fockens P, Marinelli AW, et al. Early closure of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgery for stage IV left-sided colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. Mar 2008;40(3):184-91. [Medline].

  4. Ripamonti CI, Easson AM, Gerdes H. Management of malignant bowel obstruction. Eur J Cancer. May 2008;44(8):1105-15. [Medline].

  5. Mukai M, Tanaka A, Tajima T, et al. Two-port hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for the 2-stage treatment of a complete bowel obstruction by left colon cancer: a case report. Oncol Rep. Apr 2008;19(4):875-9. [Medline].

  6. Caceres A, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, et al. Colorectal stents for palliation of large-bowel obstructions in recurrent gynecologic cancer: an updated series. Gynecol Oncol. Mar 2008;108(3):482-5. [Medline].

  7. De Giorgio R, Stanghellini V, Barbara G, et al. Prokinetics in the treatment of acute intestinal pseudo-obstruction. IDrugs. 2004/02;7(2):160-5.

  8. de Gregorio MA, Mainar A, Tejero E, et al. Acute colorectal obstruction: stent placement for palliative treatment--results of a multicenter study. Radiology. Oct 1998;209(1):117-20. [Medline].

  9. Deen KI, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM, et al. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: the University of Minnesota experience. J Am Coll Surg. Dec 1998;187(6):573-6. [Medline].

  10. Fan YB, Cheng YS, Chen NW, et al. Clinical application of self-expanding metallic stent in the management of acute left-sided colorectal malignant obstruction. World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7 2006;12(5):755-9. [Medline].

  11. Forloni B, Reduzzi R, Paludetti A, et al. Intraoperative colonic lavage in emergency surgical treatment of left-sided colonic obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. Jan 1998;41(1):23-7. [Medline].

  12. Isbister WH, Prasad J. Emergency large bowel surgery: a 15-year audit. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(5):285-90. [Medline].

  13. Lopez-Kostner F, Hool GR, Lavery IC. Management and causes of acute large-bowel obstruction. Surg Clin North Am. Dec 1997;77(6):1265-90. [Medline].

  14. Losanoff JE, Basson MD. Amyand hernia: what lies beneath--a proposed classification scheme to determine management. Am Surg. Dec 2007;73(12):1288-90. [Medline].

  15. Reemst PH, Kuijpers HC, Wobbes T. Management of left-sided colonic obstruction by subtotal colectomy and ileocolic anastomosis. Eur J Surg. Jul 1998;164(7):537-40; discussion 541-2. [Medline].

  16. Sakorafas GH, Peros G. Obstructing sigmoid cancer in a patient with a large, tender, non-reducible inguinal hernia: the obvious diagnosis is not always the correct one. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). Jan 2008;17(1):72-3. [Medline].

  17. Schermer CR, Hanosh JJ, Davis M, et al. Ogilvie's syndrome in the surgical patient: a new therapeutic modality. J Gastrointest Surg. Mar-Apr 1999;3(2):173-7. [Medline].

  18. [Best Evidence] Sgouros SN, Vlachogiannakos J, Vassiliadis K, et al. Effect of polyethylene glycol electrolyte balanced solution on patients with acute colonic pseudo obstruction after resolution of colonic dilation: a prospective, randomised, placebo controlled trial. Gut. May 2006;55(5):638-42. [Medline].

  19. Stefanidis D, Brown K, Nazario H, et al. Safety and efficacy of metallic stents in the management of colorectal obstruction. JSLS. Oct-Dec 2005;9(4):454-9. [Medline].

  20. Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, et al. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol. Jul 1999;40(4):422-8. [Medline].

  21. Turegano-Fuentes F, Echenagusia-Belda A, Simo-Muerza G, et al. Transanal self-expanding metal stents as an alternative to palliative colostomy in selected patients with malignant obstruction of the left colon. Br J Surg. Feb 1998;85(2):232-5. [Medline].

  22. Turegano-Fuentes F, Munoz-Jimenez F, Del Valle-Hernandez E, et al. Early resolution of Ogilvie's syndrome with intravenous neostigmine: a simple, effective treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. Nov 1997;40(11):1353-7. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.