Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Treatment & Management

  • Author: Marco G Patti, MD; Chief Editor: BS Anand, MD  more...
 
Updated: May 02, 2016
 

Approach Considerations

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) involves a stepwise approach. The goals are to control symptoms, to heal esophagitis, and to prevent recurrent esophagitis or other complications. The treatment is based on (1) lifestyle modification and (2) control of gastric acid secretion through medical therapy with antacids or PPIs or surgical treatment with corrective antireflux surgery.[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

Approximately 80% of patients have a recurrent but nonprogressive form of GERD that is controlled with medications. (See Medical Therapy.) Identifying the 20% of patients who have a progressive form of the disease is important, because they may develop severe complications, such as strictures or Barrett esophagus. For patients who develop complications, surgical treatment should be considered at an earlier stage to avoid the sequelae of the disease that can have serious consequences. (See Surgical Therapy.)

Use of a patient management tool such as the self-administered GERD Questionnaire (GerdQ) to stratify patients may improve the management of GERD patients in primary care settings.[28]

Next

Lifestyle Modifications

Lifestyle modifications include the following:

  • Losing weight (if overweight)
  • Avoiding alcohol, chocolate, citrus juice, and tomato-based products (2005 guidelines from the American College of Gastroenterology [ACG] also suggest avoiding peppermint, coffee, and possibly the onion family [7] )
  • Avoiding large meals
  • Waiting 3 hours after a meal before lying down
  • Elevating the head of the bed by 8 inches

According to the ACG 2005 guidelines, studies have shown decreased distal esophageal acid exposure after these changes are made, but few data are available to confirm these findings.[7]

Lifestyle modifications are the first line of management in pregnant women with GERD. Advise patients to elevate the head of the bed; avoid bending or stooping positions; eat small, frequent meals; and refrain from ingesting food (except liquids) within 3 hours of bedtime.

Previous
Next

Pharmacologic Therapy

Antacids

Antacids were the standard treatment in the 1970s and are still effective in controlling mild symptoms of GERD. Antacids should be taken after each meal and at bedtime.

H2 receptor antagonists and H2 blocker therapy

H2 receptor antagonists are the first-line agents for patients with mild to moderate symptoms and grades I-II esophagitis. Options include ranitidine (Zantac), cimetidine (Tagamet), famotidine (Pepcid), and nizatidine (Axid).

H2 receptor antagonists are effective for healing only mild esophagitis in 70-80% of patients with GERD and for providing maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Tachyphylaxis has been observed, suggesting that pharmacologic tolerance can reduce the long-term efficacy of these drugs.

Additional H2 blocker therapy has been reported to be useful in patients with severe disease (particularly those with Barrett esophagus) who have nocturnal acid breakthrough.

Proton pump inhibitors

PPIs are the most powerful medications available for treating GERD. These agents should be used only when this condition has been objectively documented. They have few adverse effects and are well tolerated for long-term use. However, data have shown that PPIs can interfere with calcium homeostasis and aggravate cardiac conduction defects. These agents have also been responsible for hip fracture in postmenopausal women.[29]

Available PPIs include omeprazole (Prilosec), lansoprazole (Prevacid), rabeprazole (Aciphex), and esomeprazole (Nexium). In November 2013, the FDA approved the first generic versions of rabeprazole sodium delayed-release tablets for the treatment of GERD in adults and adolescents ages 12 and up. In clinical trials, the most commonly reported adverse reactions to rabeprazole were sore throat, flatulence, infection, and constipation in adults, and abdominal pain, diarrhea, and headache in adolescents.[30]

A research review by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) concluded, on the basis of grade A evidence, that PPIs were superior to H2 receptor antagonists for the resolution of GERD symptoms at 4 weeks and healing of esophagitis at 8 weeks.[31] In addition, the AHRQ found no difference between individual PPIs (omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) for relief of symptoms at 8 weeks. For symptom relief at 4 weeks, esomeprazole 20 mg was equivalent, but esomeprazole 40 mg superior, to omeprazole 20 mg.[31]

A systematic review and meta-analysis of two randomized trials and four prospective cohort studies on the effects of PPI in obstructive sleep apnea in patients with GERD found a lack of definitive data.[32]  

Prokinetic medications and reflux inhibitors

Prokinetic agents are somewhat effective but only in patients with mild symptoms; other patients usually require additional acid-suppressing medications, such as PPIs. The usual regimen in adults is metoclopramide, 10 mg/day orally. Long-term use of prokinetic agents may have serious, even potentially fatal, complications and should be discouraged.

Previous
Next

Indications for Surgical Treatment

As in many other fields, surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux has evolved a great deal. A few historical procedures of note include the Allison crural repair, the Boerema anterior gastropexy, and the Angelchik prosthesis. Both the Allison and the Boerema repairs have high failure rates and are rarely, if ever, used.[33, 34] The Angelchik prosthesis is a silicone ring that is positioned at the gastroesophageal junction and prevents reflux. The Angelchik prosthesis was rarely used in children and has been largely abandoned because of a high rate of complications.[35]

Today, both transthoracic and transabdominal fundoplications are performed, including partial (anterior or posterior) and circumferential wraps. The most commonly performed operation today in both children and adults is the Nissen fundoplication, which is a 360° transabdominal fundoplication (see the image below).[36, 37] First reported in 1991, laparoscopic fundoplication is well studied in adult populations. Laparoscopic fundoplication has also quickly gained acceptance for use in children.[38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43]  However, in one study in which 119 children underwent fundoplication for severe GERD,  7.6% required a redo fundoplication and 53.8% needed to restart their antireflux medications within 6 months of surgery.[44]

Nissen fundoplication. Nissen fundoplication.

Indications for fundoplication include the following:

  • Patients with symptoms that are not completely controlled by PPI therapy can be considered for surgery; surgery can also be considered in patients with well-controlled GERD who desire definitive, one-time treatment
  • The presence of Barrett esophagus is an indication for surgery (whether acid suppression improves the outcome or prevents the progression of Barrett esophagus remains unknown, but most authorities recommend complete acid suppression in patients with histologically proven Barrett esophagus)
  • The presence of extraesophageal manifestations of GERD may indicate the need for surgery; these include the following: (1) respiratory manifestations (eg, cough, wheezing, aspiration); (2) ear, nose, and throat manifestations (eg, hoarseness, sore throat, otitis media); and (3) dental manifestations (eg, enamel erosion)
  • Young patients
  • Poor patient compliance with regard to medications
  • Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis
  • Patients with cardiac conduction defects
  • Cost of medical therapy

Several randomized clinical trials have challenged the benefits of surgery in controlling GERD. Lundell followed up his cohort of patients for 5 years and did not find surgery to be superior to PPI therapy.[45] Spechler found that, at 10 years after surgery, 62% of patients were back on antireflux medications.[46] A very rigorous, randomized study by Anvari et al reestablished surgery as the criterion standard in treating GERD.[47] The investigators showed that, at 1 year, the outcome and the symptom control in the surgical group was better than that in the medical group.[47]

A British multicenter randomized study conducted by Grant et al also compared surgical treatment versus medical therapy in patients with documented evidence of GERD.[48] The type of laparoscopic fundoplication was decided by the respective surgeons. Individuals who had received medication for their condition had taken them for a median of 32 months before participating in the study. The investigators reported that by 12 months, 38% of those who had undergone surgery were taking reflux medication, compared with 90% of the individuals randomized to medical management.[48]

Long-term results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery have shown that, at 10 years, 90% of patients are symptom free and only a minority still take PPIs.[49]

Long-term follow-up results from a multicenter, randomized trial showed that, relative to pharmacotherapy, fundoplication maintained better symptomatic relief in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease without evidence of long-term postsurgical adverse symptoms. At 5 years, among patients with a treatment response, almost twice as many of those randomized to medical management (82%) were taking antireflux agents relative to those who had been randomized to surgery (44%).[50]

Laparoscopic fundoplication

Laparoscopic fundoplication is performed under general endotracheal anesthesia. Five small (5-mm to 10-mm) incisions are used (see image below). The fundus of the stomach is wrapped around the esophagus to create a new valve at the level of the esophagogastric junction.

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

The essential elements of the operation are as follows:

  • Complete mobilization of the fundus of the stomach with division of the short gastric vessels
  • Reduction of the hiatal hernia
  • Narrowing of the esophageal hiatus
  • Creation of a 360° fundoplication over a large intraesophageal dilator (Nissen fundoplication)

Laparoscopic fundoplication procedure takes about 2-2.5 hours. The hospital stay is approximately 2 days. Patients resume regular activities within 2-3 weeks. Approximately 92% of patients obtain resolution of symptoms after undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication.

The AHRQ found, on the basis of limited evidence, that laparoscopic fundoplication was as effective as open fundoplication in relieving heartburn and regurgitation, improving quality of life, and decreasing the use of antisecretory medications.[31]

Although a prospective, randomized trial has never been performed to compare PPIs to laparoscopic fundoplication, the authors believe fundoplication is preferable for the following reasons:

  • PPIs, although effective in controlling the acid component of the refluxate, do not eliminate the reflux of bile, which some believe to be a major contributor to the pathogenesis of Barrett epithelium
  • Patients with Barrett esophagus tend to have lower LES pressure and worse esophageal peristalsis than patients without Barrett esophagus; patients with Barrett esophagus are also exposed to a larger amount of reflux
  • A fundoplication offers the only possibility of stopping any kind of reflux by creating a competent LES; however, until the definitive answer is known, the authors recommend that patients with Barrett esophagus should continue to undergo periodic endoscopic surveillance even after laparoscopic fundoplication

Sleeve gastrectomy

In a study that evaluated laparascopic sleeve gastrectomy for GERD in 71 morbidly obese patients, symptomatic and reflux control improved in most patients following the procedure.[51] However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 studies was unable to determine the effect of sleeve gastrectomy on the prevalence of  GERD owing to the high heterogeneity among available studies and paradoxical outcomes of objective esophageal function tests.[52]

Devices

The US Food and Drug Administration approved the LINX Reflux Management System in March 2012. This device is designed to augment the lower esophageal sphincter. The system is a small flexible band that is placed laparoscopically around the esophagus just above the stomach to create a natural barrier to reflux. The band consists of interlinked titanium beads with magnetic cores. The act of swallowing temporarily breaks the magnetic bond, allowing food and liquid to pass normally.[53]

In a systematic review, magnetic sphincter augmentation appeared to reinforce the lower esophageal sphincter to antireflux, effectively reducing the time percentage of esophageal acid exposure (pH <4), improving the GERD health-related quality of life score, reducing the operative time (vs Nissen fundoplication), and achieving similar treatment success as that of fundoplication.[54]  These findings suggest that magnetic sphincter augmentation may have potential as an alternative surgical option for patients with conservative GERD treatment failure.[54]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Marco G Patti, MD Professor of Surgery, Director, Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine

Marco G Patti, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Surgical Association, American College of Surgeons, American Gastroenterological Association, American Medical Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Southwestern Surgical Congress, Western Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

BS Anand, MD Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine

BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Julian Katz, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine

Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Piero Marco Fisichella, MD Assistant Professor of Surgery, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University; Director, Esophageal Motility Center, Loyola University Medical Center.

Piero Marco Fisichella is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Fernando AM Herbella, MD, PhD, TCBC Affiliate Professor, Attending Surgeon in Gastrointestinal Surgery, Esophagus and Stomach Division, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; Private Practice; Medical Examiner, Sao Paulo's Medical Examiner's Office Headquarters, Brazil

Fernando AM Herbella, MD, PhD, TCBC is a member of the following medical societies: Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John Gunn Lee, MD Director of Pancreaticobiliary Service, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California at Irvine School of Medicine

John Gunn Lee, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Thomas F Murphy, MD Chief of Abdominal Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Tripler Army Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Manish K Varma, MD Chief of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Tripler Army Medical Center

Manish K Varma, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Radiology, American Roentgen Ray Society, and Radiological Society of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Noel Williams, MD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Noel Williams, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Giannini EG, Zentilin P, Dulbecco P, Vigneri S, Scarlata P, Savarino V. Management strategy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb. 103(2):267-75. [Medline].

  2. Katz PO. Medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2007. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2007 Fall. 7(4):193-203. [Medline].

  3. Fass R, Sifrim D. Management of heartburn not responding to proton pump inhibitors. Gut. 2009 Feb. 58(2):295-309. [Medline].

  4. Fass R. Proton pump inhibitor failure--what are the therapeutic options?. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar. 104 Suppl 2:S33-8. [Medline].

  5. Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM. Overutilization of proton pump inhibitors: a review of cost-effectiveness and risk [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar. 104 Suppl 2:S27-32. [Medline].

  6. Dial MS. Proton pump inhibitor use and enteric infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar. 104 Suppl 2:S10-6. [Medline].

  7. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan. 100(1):190-200. [Medline].

  8. Gallup Organization. Heartburn Across America: A Gallup Organization National Survey. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.; 1988.

  9. Richter JE. Surgery for reflux disease: reflections of a gastroenterologist. N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 19. 326(12):825-7. [Medline].

  10. Chen CL, Robert JJ, Orr WC. Sleep symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan. 42(1):13-7. [Medline].

  11. Sveen S. Symptom check: is it GERD?. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2009 Mar. 40(3):103-4. [Medline].

  12. Mittal RK, Rochester DF, McCallum RW. Sphincteric action of the diaphragm during a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter in humans. Am J Physiol. 1989 Jan. 256(1 Pt 1):G139-44. [Medline].

  13. Mittal RK, McCallum RW. Characteristics of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in humans. Am J Physiol. 1987 May. 252(5 Pt 1):G636-41. [Medline].

  14. Mittal RK, Rochester DF, McCallum RW. Effect of the diaphragmatic contraction on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in man. Gut. 1987 Dec. 28(12):1564-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Stein HJ, DeMeester TR. Outpatient physiologic testing and surgical management of foregut motility disorders. Curr Probl Surg. 1992 Jul. 29(7):413-555. [Medline].

  16. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Kern M, Arndorfer RC, Reece A. Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 1986 Oct. 91(4):897-904. [Medline].

  17. Buttar NS, Falk GW. Pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett esophagus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Feb. 76(2):226-34. [Medline].

  18. Hampel H, Abraham NS, El-Serag HB. Meta-analysis: obesity and the risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease and its complications. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 2. 143(3):199-211. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Herbella FA, Sweet MP, Tedesco P, Nipomnick I, Patti MG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and obesity. Pathophysiology and implications for treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Mar. 11(3):286-90. [Medline].

  20. Merrouche M, Sabaté JM, Jouet P, Harnois F, Scaringi S, Coffin B, et al. Gastro-esophageal reflux and esophageal motility disorders in morbidly obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2007 Jul. 17(7):894-900. [Medline].

  21. Murray L, Johnston B, Lane A, Harvey I, Donovan J, Nair P, et al. Relationship between body mass and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: The Bristol Helicobacter Project. Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug. 32(4):645-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  22. Pandolfino JE, El-Serag HB, Zhang Q, Shah N, Ghosh SK, Kahrilas PJ. Obesity: a challenge to esophagogastric junction integrity. Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar. 130(3):639-49. [Medline].

  23. El-Serag HB, Graham DY, Satia JA, Rabeneck L. Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun. 100(6):1243-50. [Medline].

  24. Tutuian R,. Adverse effects of drugs on the esophagus. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr. 24(2):91-7. [Medline].

  25. Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, et al. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 May 18. 305(19):1969-77. [Medline].

  26. Bhatia J, Parish A. GERD or not GERD: the fussy infant. J Perinatol. 2009 May. 29 Suppl 2:S7-11. [Medline].

  27. Levine MS, Rubesin SE. Diseases of the esophagus: diagnosis with esophagography. Radiology. 2005 Nov. 237(2):414-27. [Medline].

  28. Ponce J, Garrigues V, Agréus L, Tabaglio E, Gschwantler M, Guallar E, et al. Structured management strategy based on the Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Questionnaire (GerdQ) vs. usual primary care for GERD: pooled analysis of five cluster-randomised European studies. Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Sep. 66(9):897-905. [Medline].

  29. Yang YX, Lewis JD, Epstein S, Metz DC. Long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy and risk of hip fracture. JAMA. 2006 Dec 27. 296(24):2947-53. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  30. US Food and Drug Administration Press Announcements. FDA approves first generic versions of Aciphex delayed-release tablets to treat GERD. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm374329.htm. Accessed: November 12, 2013.

  31. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Executive Summary. AHRQ pub. no. 06-EHC003-1. December 2005. Available at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/healthInfo.cfm?infotype=rr&ProcessID=1&DocID=42. Accessed: September 27, 2010.

  32. Rassameehiran S, Klomjit S, Hosiriluck N, Nugent K. Meta-analysis of the effect of proton pump inhibitors on obstructive sleep apnea symptoms and indices in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2016 Jan. 29 (1):3-6. [Medline].

  33. Boerema I. Hiatus hernia: repair by right-sided, subhepatic, anterior gastropexy. Surgery. 1969 Jun. 65(6):884-93. [Medline].

  34. Allison PR. Hiatus hernia: (a 20-year retrospective survey). Ann Surg. 1973 Sep. 178(3):273-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  35. Varshney S, Kelly JJ, Branagan G, Somers SS, Kelly JM. Angelchik prosthesis revisited. World J Surg. 2002 Jan. 26(1):129-33. [Medline].

  36. Nissen R, Rossetti M, Siewert R. [20 years in the management of reflux disease using fundoplication]. Chirurg. 1977 Oct. 48(10):634-9. [Medline].

  37. Kazerooni NL, VanCamp J, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA, Coran AG. Fundoplication in 160 children under 2 years of age. J Pediatr Surg. 1994 May. 29(5):677-81. [Medline].

  38. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S, Lombard R. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991 Sep. 1(3):138-43. [Medline].

  39. Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period. Br J Surg. 2000 Jul. 87(7):873-8. [Medline].

  40. Wenner J, Nilsson G, Oberg S, Melin T, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Short-term outcome after laparoscopic and open 360 degrees fundoplication. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct. 15(10):1124-8. [Medline].

  41. Somme S, Rodriguez JA, Kirsch DG, Liu DC. Laparoscopic versus open fundoplication in infants. Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan. 16(1):54-6. [Medline].

  42. Rangel SJ, Henry MC, Brindle M, Moss RL. Small evidence for small incisions: pediatric laparoscopy and the need for more rigorous evaluation of novel surgical therapies. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Oct. 38(10):1429-33. [Medline].

  43. Rothenberg SS. The first decade's experience with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Jan. 40(1):142-6; discussion 147. [Medline].

  44. Pascoe E, Falvey T, Jiwane A, Henry G, Krishnan U. Outcomes of fundoplication for paediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015 Dec 8. [Medline].

  45. Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Pedersen SA, Liedman B, Hatlebakk JG, et al. Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Feb. 192(2):172-9; discussion 179-81. [Medline].

  46. Spechler SJ. Epidemiology and natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion. 1992. 51 Suppl 1:24-9. [Medline].

  47. Anvari M, Allen C, Marshall J, Armstrong D, Goeree R, Ungar W, et al. A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for treatment of patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease: One-year follow-up. Surg Innov. 2006 Dec. 13(4):238-49. [Medline].

  48. Grant AM, Wileman SM, Ramsay CR, Mowat NA, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, et al. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial. BMJ. 2008 Dec 15. 337:a2664. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  49. El-Serag HB. Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan. 5(1):17-26. [Medline].

  50. Grant AM, Cotton SC, Boachie C, Ramsay CR, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, et al. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX). BMJ. 2013 Apr 18. 346:f1908. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  51. Rebecchi F, Allaix ME, Giaccone C, Ugliono E, Scozzari G, Morino M. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a physiopathologic evaluation. Ann Surg. 2014 Nov. 260 (5):909-14; discussion 914-5. [Medline].

  52. Oor JE, Roks DJ, Unlu C, Hazebroek EJ. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016 Jan. 211 (1):250-67. [Medline].

  53. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves LINX Reflux Management System to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm296923.htm.

  54. Zhang H, Dong D, Liu Z, He S, Hu L, Lv Y. Revaluation of the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec 10. [Medline].

  55. Kramer JR, Shakhatreh MH, Naik AD, Duan Z, El-Serag HB. Use and Yield of Endoscopy in Patients With Uncomplicated Gastroesophageal Reflux Disorder. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan 27. [Medline].

  56. Mattioli S, Lugaresi ML, Di Simone MP, D'Ovidio F, Pilotti V, Bassi F, et al. The surgical treatment of the intrathoracic migration of the gastro-oesophageal junction and of short oesophagus in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun. 25(6):1079-88. [Medline].

  57. Osterwell N. GERD: High-Risk Patients Get Endoscopic Short Shrift. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/819754. Accessed: February 3, 2014.

  58. Scheffer RC, Samsom M, Haverkamp A, Oors J, Hebbard GS, Gooszen HG. Impaired bolus transit across the esophagogastric junction in postfundoplication dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Aug. 100(8):1677-84. [Medline].

  59. Talley NJ, Napthali KE. Endoscopy in Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Scoping Out Whom to Target. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan 27. [Medline].

  60. Telem DA, Altieri M, Gracia G, Pryor AD. Perioperative outcome of esophageal fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease in obese and morbidly obese patients. Am J Surg. 2014 Aug. 208 (2):163-8. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Relationship of the phrenoesophageal ligament to the diaphragm and esophagus.
Arterial blood supply and lymphatic drainage of the esophagus.
Peptic esophagitis.
Reflux esophagitis is demonstrated on barium esophagram.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)/Barrett esophagus/adenocarcinoma sequence.
Endoscopy demonstrating intraluminal esophageal cancer.
The image is a representation of concomitant intraesophageal pH and esophageal electrical impedance measurements. The vertical solid arrow indicates commencement of a nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) episode (diagonal arrow). The vertical dashed arrow indicates the onset of a normal swallow.
Nissen fundoplication.
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
Hiatal hernia.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.