eMedicine Specialties > Gastroenterology > Liver

Hepatorenal Syndrome

Author: Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Hemant K Roy, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Evanston-Northwestern Healthcare; Rowen K Zetterman, MD, Chief, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Omaha; Director of Clinical Operation, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: May 15, 2008

Introduction

Background

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the development of renal failure in patients with advanced chronic liver disease, occasionally fulminant hepatitis, who have portal hypertension and ascites. Estimates indicate that at least 40% of patients with cirrhosis and ascites will develop HRS during the natural history of their disease.

During the 19th century, Frerichs and Flint made the original description of renal function disturbances in liver disease. They described oliguria in patients with chronic liver disease in the absence of proteinuria and linked the abnormalities in renal function to disturbances present in the systemic circulation. In the 1950s, the clinical description of HRS by Sherlock, Popper, and Vessin emphasized the functional nature of the syndrome, the coexistence of systemic circulatory abnormalities, and its dismal prognosis. Further studies in the following 2 decades demonstrated that renal failure occurred because of vasoconstriction of the renal circulation and intense systemic arteriolar vasodilatation resulting in reduced systemic vascular resistance and arterial hypotension.

In HRS, the histological appearance of the kidneys is normal, and the kidneys often resume normal function following liver transplantation. This makes HRS a unique pathophysiological disorder that provides possibilities for studying the interplay between vasoconstrictor and vasodilator systems on the renal circulation.

Relevant studies include those implicating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), and the role of renal prostaglandins (PGs).Strong associations have been reported between spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and HRS and the use of vasopressin analogues with volume expanders in the management and prevention of HRS. Although a similar syndrome may occur in acute liver failure, HRS is usually described in the context of chronic liver disease. Despite some encouraging studies of new pharmacological therapies, the development of HRS in people with cirrhosis portends a dismal prognosis because renal failure is usually irreversible unless liver transplantation is performed.

Pathophysiology

The hallmark of HRS is renal vasoconstriction, although the pathogenesis is not fully understood. Multiple mechanisms are probably involved and include interplay between disturbances in systemic hemodynamics, activation of vasoconstrictor systems, and a reduction in activity of the vasodilator systems. The hemodynamic pattern of patients with HRS is characterized by increased cardiac output, low arterial pressure, and reduced systemic vascular resistance. Renal vasoconstriction occurs in the absence of reduced cardiac output and blood volume, which is in contrast to most clinical conditions associated with renal hypoperfusion.

Although the pattern of increased renal vascular resistance and decreased peripheral resistance is characteristic of HRS, it also occurs in other conditions, such as anaphylaxis and sepsis. Doppler studies of the brachial, middle cerebral, and femoral arteries suggest that extrarenal resistance is increased in patients with HRS, while the splanchnic circulation is responsible for arterial vasodilatation and reduced total systemic vascular resistance.

The RAAS and SNS are the predominant systems responsible for renal vasoconstriction. The activity of both systems is increased in patients with cirrhosis and ascites, and this effect is magnified in HRS. In contrast, an inverse relationship exists between the activity of these 2 systems and renal plasma flow (RPF) and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Endothelin is another renal vasoconstrictor present in increased concentration in HRS, although its role in the pathogenesis of this syndrome has yet to be identified. Adenosine is well known for its vasodilator properties, although it acts as a vasoconstrictor in the lungs and kidneys. Elevated levels of adenosine are more common in patients with heightened activity of the RAAS and may work synergistically with angiotensin II to produce renal vasoconstriction in HRS. This effect has also been described with the powerful renal vasoconstrictor, leukotriene E4.

The vasoconstricting effect of these various systems is antagonized by local renal vasodilatory factors, the most important of which are the PGs. Perhaps the strongest evidence supporting their role in renal perfusion is the marked decrease in RPF and the GFR when nonsteroidals, medications known to sharply reduce PG levels, are administered.

Nitric oxide (NO) is another vasodilator believed to play an important role in renal perfusion. Preliminary studies, predominantly from animal experiments, demonstrate that NO production is increased in people with cirrhosis, although NO inhibition does not result in renal vasoconstriction due to a compensatory increase in PG synthesis. However, when both NO and PG production are inhibited, marked renal vasoconstriction develops.

These findings demonstrate that renal vasodilators play a critical role in maintaining renal perfusion, particularly in the presence of overactivity of renal vasoconstrictors. However, whether vasoconstrictor activity becomes the predominant system in HRS and whether reduction in activity of the vasodilatory system contributes to this have yet to be proven.

Various theories have been proposed to explain the development of HRS in cirrhosis. The 2 main theories are the arterial vasodilation theory and the hepatorenal reflex theory. The former theory not only describes sodium and water retention in cirrhosis, but also may be the most rational hypothesis for the development of HRS. Splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation in patients with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension may be mediated by several factors, the most important of which is probably NO. In the early phases of portal hypertension and compensated cirrhosis, this underfilling of the arterial bed causes a decrease in the effective arterial blood volume and results in homeostatic/reflex activation of the endogenous vasoconstrictor systems.

Activation of the RAAS and SNS occurs early with antidiuretic hormone secretion, a later event when a more marked derangement in circulatory function is present. This results in vasoconstriction not only of the renal vessels, but also in vascular beds of the brain, muscle, spleen, and extremities. The splanchnic circulation is resistant to these effects because of the continuous production of local vasodilators such as NO.

In the early phases of portal hypertension, renal perfusion is maintained within normal or near-normal limits as the vasodilatory systems antagonize the renal effects of the vasoconstrictor systems. However, as liver disease progresses in severity, a critical level of vascular underfilling is achieved. Renal vasodilatory systems are unable to counteract the maximal activation of the endogenous vasoconstrictors and/or intrarenal vasoconstrictors, which leads to uncontrolled renal vasoconstriction. Support for this hypothesis is provided by studies in which the administration of splanchnic vasoconstrictors in combination with volume expanders results in improvement in arterial pressure, RPF, and the GFR.

The alternative theory proposes that renal vasoconstriction in HRS is unrelated to systemic hemodynamics but is due to either a deficiency in the synthesis of a vasodilatory factor or a hepatorenal reflex that leads to renal vasoconstriction. Evidence points to the vasodilation theory as a more tangible explanation for the development of HRS.

Frequency

United States

HRS is common, with a reported incidence of 10% among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and ascites. In decompensated cirrhotics, the probability of developing HRS with ascites ranges between 8-20% per year and increases to 40% at 5 years.

International

The incidence of HRS globally is similar to that in the United States.

Mortality/Morbidity

Physicians need to be aware that 2 different forms of HRS are described. Although their pathophysiology is similar, their manifestations and outcomes are different.

  • Type 1 HRS is characterized by rapid and progressive renal impairment and is most commonly precipitated by SBP. Type 1 HRS occurs in approximately 25% of patients with SBP, despite rapid resolution of the infection with antibiotics. Without treatment, median survival of patients with type 1 HRS is less than 2 weeks, and virtually all patients die within 10 weeks after the onset of renal failure.
  • Type 2 HRS is characterized by a moderate and stable reduction in the GFR and commonly occurs in patients with relatively preserved hepatic function. These patients are often diuretic-resistant with a median survival of 3-6 months. Although this is markedly longer than type 1 HRS, it is still shorter compared to patients with cirrhosis and ascites who do not have renal failure.

Race

People of all races who have chronic liver disease are at risk for HRS.

Sex

Frequency is equal in both sexes.

Age

Most patients with chronic liver disease are in their fourth to eighth decades of life.

Clinical

History

Most individuals with cirrhosis who develop HRS have nonspecific symptoms, such as fatigue, malaise, or dysgeusia. Development of HRS is usually noticed when patients observe decreased urine output and when blood test results show a decline in renal function.

Physical

HRS has no specific signs. However, detecting stigmata of chronic liver disease is important because most patients at risk for HRS have cirrhosis. The following list of physical findings is not all-inclusive, and these findings are not present in all patients with chronic liver disease.

  • Hands
    • Palmar erythema
    • Leuconychia
    • Asterixis
    • Muscle wasting
    • Clubbing
  • Head, ears, nose, throat
    • Scleral icterus
    • Muscle wasting
    • Spider nevi (usually confined to the drainage area of the superior vena cava)
    • Fetor hepaticus
    • Xanthelasma
    • Chest - Gynecomastia
  • Abdomen
    • Caput medusae
    • Hepatosplenomegaly
    • Ascites
    • Paraumbilical hernia
    • Bruits
  • Genitalia
    • Loss of pubic hair/secondary sexual characteristics in men
    • Atrophic testes
  • Extremities
    • Peripheral edema
    • Clubbing

Causes

Risk factors for developing HRS have been reported based on a large series of patients with cirrhosis and ascites and, for the most part, are related to circulatory and renal function. Three important and easily recognized risk factors are low mean arterial blood pressure (<80 mm Hg), dilutional hyponatremia, and severe urinary sodium retention (urine sodium <5 mEq/L). Interestingly, patients with advanced liver disease, defined by a high Child-Pugh score or worsening parameters of liver function, such as albumin, bilirubin, and prothrombin levels, are not at higher risk of developing HRS.

In some patients, HRS may occur spontaneously, whereas in others, it may be associated with infections (particularly SBP), acute alcoholic hepatitis, or large-volume paracentesis without albumin replacement. SBP precipitates type 1 HRS in approximately 20% of patients despite appropriate and timely diagnosis, treatment, and resolution of infection. Large-volume paracentesis without albumin replacement can precipitate type 1 HRS in up to 15% of patients. Although renal failure occurs in up to 10% of cirrhotics with gastrointestinal bleeding, this is usually in the presence of hypovolemic shock, suggesting that renal failure is related to acute tubular necrosis rather than HRS.

The following is a list of risk factors associated with the development of HRS in patients with cirrhosis who are nonazotemic. All measurements were obtained after a minimum of 5 days on a low-salt diet and without diuretics.

  • Low urinary sodium excretion  (<5 mEq/L)
  • Low serum sodium (dilutional hyponatremia)
  • Reduced free-water excretion after water load
  • Low mean arterial pressure
  • High plasma renin activity
  • Increased plasma norepinephrine
  • Low plasma osmolality
  • High urine osmolality
  • High serum potassium
  • Previous episodes of ascites
  • Absence of hepatomegaly
  • Presence of esophageal varices
  • Poor nutritional status
  • Moderately increased serum urea (>30 mg/dL)
  • Moderately increased serum creatinine (>1.5 mg/dL)
  • Moderately reduced GFR  (<50 mL/min)

More on Hepatorenal Syndrome

Overview: Hepatorenal Syndrome
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Hepatorenal Syndrome
Treatment & Medication: Hepatorenal Syndrome
Follow-up: Hepatorenal Syndrome
References

References

  1. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, Habet K, Zanotti S, Marshall S, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. Mar 2004;32(3):691-9. [Medline].

  2. Bellomo R, Chapman M, Finfer S, Hickling K, Myburgh J. Low-dose dopamine in patients with early renal dysfunction: a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Clinical Trials Group. Lancet. Dec 23-30 2000;356(9248):2139-43. [Medline].

  3. Fevery J, Van Cutsem E, Nevens F, Van Steenbergen W, Verberckmoes R, De Groote J. Reversal of hepatorenal syndrome in four patients by peroral misoprostol (prostaglandin E1 analogue) and albumin administration. J Hepatol. Sep 1990;11(2):153-8. [Medline].

  4. Gines A, Salmeron JM, Gines P, Arroyo V, Jimenez W, Rivera F, et al. Oral misoprostol or intravenous prostaglandin E2 do not improve renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites with hyponatremia or renal failure. J Hepatol. Feb 1993;17(2):220-6. [Medline].

  5. Soper CP, Latif AB, Bending MR. Amelioration of hepatorenal syndrome with selective endothelin-A antagonist. Lancet. Jun 29 1996;347(9018):1842-3. [Medline].

  6. Lenz K, Druml W, Kleinberger G, Hortnagl H, Laggner A, Schneeweiss B, et al. Enhancement of renal function with ornipressin in a patient with decompensated cirrhosis. Gut. Dec 1985;26(12):1385-6. [Medline].

  7. Lenz K, Hortnagl H, Druml W, Grimm G, Laggner A, Schneeweisz B, et al. Beneficial effect of 8-ornithin vasopressin on renal dysfunction in decompensated cirrhosis. Gut. Jan 1989;30(1):90-6. [Medline].

  8. Lenz K, Hortnagl H, Druml W, Reither H, Schmid R, Schneeweiss B, et al. Ornipressin in the treatment of functional renal failure in decompensated liver cirrhosis. Effects on renal hemodynamics and atrial natriuretic factor. Gastroenterology. Oct 1991;101(4):1060-7. [Medline].

  9. Guevara M, Ginès P. Hepatorenal syndrome. Dig Dis. 2005;23(1):47-55. [Medline].

  10. Guevara M, Rodés J. Hepatorenal syndrome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. Jan 2005;37(1):22-6. [Medline].

  11. Angeli P, Volpin R, Gerunda G, Craighero R, Roner P, Merenda R, et al. Reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome with the administration of midodrine and octreotide. Hepatology. Jun 1999;29(6):1690-7. [Medline].

  12. Wong F, Pantea L, Sniderman K. Midodrine, octreotide, albumin, and TIPS in selected patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology. Jul 2004;40(1):55-64. [Medline].

  13. Gonwa TA, Morris CA, Goldstein RM, Husberg BS, Klintmalm GB. Long-term survival and renal function following liver transplantation in patients with and without hepatorenal syndrome--experience in 300 patients. Transplantation. Feb 1991;51(2):428-30. [Medline].

  14. Akriviadis E, Botla R, Briggs W, Han S, Reynolds T, Shakil O. Pentoxifylline improves short-term survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. Dec 2000;119(6):1637-48. [Medline].

  15. Alessandria C, Ottobrelli A, Debernardi-Venon W, Todros L, Cerenzia MT, Martini S, et al. Noradrenalin vs terlipressin in patients with hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective, randomized, unblinded, pilot study. J Hepatol. Oct 2007;47(4):499-505. [Medline].

  16. Arieff AI, Chidsey CA. Renal function in cirrhosis and the effects of prostaglandin A. Am J Med. May 1974;56(5):695-703. [Medline].

  17. Arroyo V, Bosch J, Rivera F, et al. The renin angiotensin system in cirrhosis. Its relation to functional renal failure. In: Bartoli E, Chiandussi L, eds. Hepatorenal Syndrome. Padua, Italy: Piccin Medical Books; 1979:201-29.

  18. Arroyo V. The liver and the kidney: mutual clearance or mixed intoxication. Contrib Nephrol. 2007;156:17-23. [Medline].

  19. Arroyo V, Gines P, Gerbes AL, Dudley FJ, Gentilini P, Laffi G, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. International Ascites Club. Hepatology. Jan 1996;23(1):164-76. [Medline].

  20. Arroyo V, Terra C, Ginès P. Advances in the pathogenesis and treatment of type-1 and type-2 hepatorenal syndrome. J Hepatol. May 2007;46(5):935-46. [Medline].

  21. Arroyo V, Terra C, Ginès P. New treatments of hepatorenal syndrome. Semin Liver Dis. Aug 2006;26(3):254-64. [Medline].

  22. Arroyo V, Torre A, Guevara M. Recent advances in hepatorenal syndrome. Trop Gastroenterol. Jan-Mar 2005;26(1):13-20. [Medline].

  23. Bacq Y, Gaudin C, Hadengue A, Roulot D, Braillon A, Moreau R, et al. Systemic, splanchnic and renal hemodynamic effects of a dopaminergic dose of dopamine in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. Sep 1991;14(3):483-7. [Medline].

  24. Barnardo DE, Baldus WP, Maher FT. Effects of dopamine on renal function in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. Apr 1970;58(4):524-31. [Medline].

  25. Bennett WM, Keeffe E, Melnyk C, Mahler D, Rosch J, Porter GA. Response to dopamine hydrochloride in the hepatorenal syndrome. Arch Intern Med. Jul 1975;135(7):964-71. [Medline].

  26. Betrosian AP, Agarwal B, Douzinas EE. Acute renal dysfunction in liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14 2007;13(42):5552-9. [Medline].

  27. Cárdenas A. Hepatorenal syndrome: a dreaded complication of end-stage liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. Feb 2005;100(2):460-7. [Medline].

  28. Cárdenas A, Gines P. Hepatorenal syndrome. Clin Liver Dis. May 2006;10(2):371-85, ix-x. [Medline].

  29. Cárdenas A, Ginès P. Therapy insight: Management of hepatorenal syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jun 2006;3(6):338-48. [Medline].

  30. D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. Jan 2006;44(1):217-31. [Medline].

  31. Dagher L, Patch D, Marley R, Moore K, Burroughs A. Review article: pharmacological treatment of the hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. May 2000;14(5):515-21. [Medline].

  32. Epstein M, Berk DP, Hollenberg NK, Adams DF, Chalmers TC, Abrams HL, et al. Renal failure in the patient with cirrhosis. The role of active vasoconstriction. Am J Med. Aug 1970;49(2):175-85. [Medline].

  33. Esrailian E, Pantangco ER, Kyulo NL, Hu KQ, Runyon BA. Octreotide/Midodrine therapy significantly improves renal function and 30-day survival in patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 2007;52(3):742-8. [Medline].

  34. Esrailian E, Runyon BA. Alcoholic cirrhosis-associated hepatorenal syndrome treated with vasoactive agents. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. Mar 2006;2(3):169-72. [Medline].

  35. Esrailian E, Runyon BA. Alcoholic cirrhosis-associated hepatorenal syndrome treated with vasoactive agents. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. Mar 2006;2(3):169-72. [Medline].

  36. Esteva-Font C, Baccaro ME, Fernández-Llama P, Sans L, Guevara M, Ars E, et al. Aquaporin-1 and aquaporin-2 urinary excretion in cirrhosis: Relationship with ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology. Dec 2006;44(6):1555-63. [Medline].

  37. Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P. Meta-analysis: terlipressin therapy for the hepatorenal syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Sep 15 2006;24(6):935-44. [Medline].

  38. [Best Evidence] Fernández J, Navasa M, Planas R, Montoliu S, Monfort D, Soriano G, et al. Primary prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis delays hepatorenal syndrome and improves survival in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. Sep 2007;133(3):818-24. [Medline].

  39. Flint A. Clinical report on hydro-peritoneum based on an analysis of forty-six cases. Am J Med Sci. 1863;45:306-39.

  40. Follo A, Llovet JM, Navasa M, Planas R, Forns X, Francitorra A, et al. Renal impairment after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: incidence, clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis. Hepatology. Dec 1994;20(6):1495-501. [Medline].

  41. Ganne-Carrie N, Hadengue A, Mathurin P, Durand F, Erlinger S, Benhamou JP. Hepatorenal syndrome. Long-term treatment with terlipressin as a bridge to liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci. Jun 1996;41(6):1054-6. [Medline].

  42. Gines A, Escorsell A, Gines P, Salo J, Jiménez W, Inglada L, et al. Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of the hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis with ascites. Gastroenterology. Jul 1993;105(1):229-36. [Medline].

  43. Gines P, Rimola A, Planas R, Vargas V, Marco F, Almela M, et al. Norfloxacin prevents spontaneous bacterial peritonitis recurrence in cirrhosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. Oct 1990;12(4 Pt 1):716-24. [Medline].

  44. Gines P, Tito L, Arroyo V, Planas R, Panes J, Viver J, et al. Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. Jun 1988;94(6):1493-502. [Medline].

  45. Gines P, Uriz J, Calahorra B, Garcia-Tsao G, Kamath PS, Del Arbol LR, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting versus paracentesis plus albumin for refractory ascites in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. Dec 2002;123(6):1839-47. [Medline].

  46. Ginès P, Cárdenas A, Arroyo V, Rodés J. Management of cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 2004;350(16):1646-54. [Medline].

  47. Ginès P, Guevara M, Arroyo V, Rodés J. Hepatorenal syndrome. Lancet. Nov 29 2003;362(9398):1819-27. [Medline].

  48. [Best Evidence] Gluud LL, Kjaer MS, Christensen E. Terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 18 2006;CD005162. [Medline].

  49. Guevara M, Gines P, Bandi JC, Gilabert R, Sort P, Jimenez W, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in hepatorenal syndrome: effects on renal function and vasoactive systems. Hepatology. Aug 1998;28(2):416-22. [Medline].

  50. Hadengue A, Gadano A, Moreau R, Giostra E, Durand F, Valla D, et al. Beneficial effects of the 2-day administration of terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. J Hepatol. Oct 1998;29(4):565-70. [Medline].

  51. Hadengue A, Moreau R, Bacq Y, Gaudin C, Braillon A, Lebrec D. Selective dopamine DA1 stimulation with fenoldopam in cirrhotic patients with ascites: a systemic, splanchnic and renal hemodynamic study. Hepatology. Jan 1991;13(1):111-6. [Medline].

  52. Halimi C, Bonnard P, Bernard B, Mathurin P, Mofredj A, di Martino V, et al. Effect of terlipressin (Glypressin) on hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients: results of a multicentre pilot study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2002;14(2):153-8. [Medline].

  53. Han MK, Hyzy R. Advances in critical care management of hepatic failure and insufficiency. Crit Care Med. Sep 2006;34(9 Suppl):S225-31. [Medline].

  54. Heidelbaugh JJ, Sherbondy M. Cirrhosis and chronic liver failure: part II. Complications and treatment. Am Fam Physician. Sep 1 2006;74(5):767-76. [Medline].

  55. Kaffy F, Borderie C, Chagneau C, Ripault MP, Larzilliere I, Silvain C, et al. Octreotide in the treatment of the hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients. J Hepatol. Jan 1999;30(1):174. [Medline].

  56. Linas SL, Schaefer JW, Moore EE, Good JT Jr, Giansiracusa R. Peritoneovenous shunt in the management of the hepatorenal syndrome. Kidney Int. Nov 1986;30(5):736-40. [Medline].

  57. Martin PY, Ginès P, Schrier RW. Nitric oxide as a mediator of hemodynamic abnormalities and sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. Aug 20 1998;339(8):533-41. [Medline].

  58. Mitzner SR, Stange J, Klammt S, Risler T, Erley CM, Bader BD, et al. Improvement of hepatorenal syndrome with extracorporeal albumin dialysis MARS: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Liver Transpl. May 2000;6(3):277-86. [Medline].

  59. Moreau R, Lebrec D. Diagnosis and treatment of acute renal failure in patients with cirrhosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(1):111-23. [Medline].

  60. Nakae H, Igarashi T, Tajimi K, Kusano T, Shibata S, Kume M, et al. A case report of hepatorenal syndrome treated with plasma diafiltration (selective plasma filtration with dialysis). Ther Apher Dial. Oct 2007;11(5):391-5. [Medline].

  61. Neri S, Pulvirenti D, Malaguarnera M, Cosimo BM, Bertino G, Ignaccolo L, et al. Terlipressin and albumin in patients with cirrhosis and type I hepatorenal syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 2008;53(3):830-5. [Medline].

  62. Neri S, Pulvirenti D, Malaguarnera M, Cosimo BM, Bertino G, Ignaccolo L, et al. Terlipressin and albumin in patients with cirrhosis and type I hepatorenal syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 2008;53(3):830-5. [Medline].

  63. O'beirne JP, Heneghan MA. Current management of the hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatol Res. Aug 2005;32(4):243-9. [Medline].

  64. Ortega R, Gines P, Uriz J, Cardenas A, Calahorra B, De Las Heras D, et al. Terlipressin therapy with and without albumin for patients with hepatorenal syndrome: results of a prospective, nonrandomized study. Hepatology. Oct 2002;36(4 Pt 1):941-8. [Medline].

  65. PAPPER S. The role of the kidney in Laennec's cirrhosis of the liver. Medicine (Baltimore). Dec 1958;37(4):299-316. [Medline].

  66. Perez GO, Golper TA, Epstein M. Dialysis, hemofiltration and other extracorporeal techniques in the treatment of renal complications of liver disease. In: Epstein M, ed. The kidney in liver disease. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Hanley & Belfus; 1996:517-28.

  67. Portal AJ, Austin M, Heneghan MA. Novel approaches to assessing renal function in cirrhotic liver disease. Hepatol Res. Sep 2007;37(9):667-72. [Medline].

  68. Restuccia T, Ortega R, Guevara M, Gines P, Alessandria C, Ozdogan O, et al. Effects of treatment of hepatorenal syndrome before transplantation on posttransplantation outcome. A case-control study. J Hepatol. Jan 2004;40(1):140-6. [Medline].

  69. Ruiz R, Barri YM, Jennings LW, Chinnakotla S, Goldstein RM, Levy MF, et al. Hepatorenal syndrome: a proposal for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT). Liver Transpl. Jun 2007;13(6):838-43. [Medline].

  70. Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Monescillo A, Arocena C, Valer P, Gines P, Moreira V, et al. Circulatory function and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology. Aug 2005;42(2):439-47. [Medline].

  71. Salerno F, Cazzaniga M, Gobbo G. Pharmacological treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: a note of optimism. J Hepatol. Nov 2007;47(5):729-31. [Medline].

  72. Salerno F, Gerbes A, Gines P, Wong F, Arroyo V. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Gut. Sep 2007;56(9):1310-8. [Medline].

  73. Salo J, Gines A, Quer JC, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Guevara M, et al. Renal and neurohormonal changes following simultaneous administration of systemic vasoconstrictors and dopamine or prostacyclin in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome. J Hepatol. Dec 1996;25(6):916-23. [Medline].

  74. Sanyal AJ, Genning C, Reddy KR, Wong F, Kowdley KV, Benner K, et al. The North American Study for the Treatment of Refractory Ascites. Gastroenterology. Mar 2003;124(3):634-41. [Medline].

  75. Schepke M. Hepatorenal syndrome: current diagnostic and therapeutic concepts. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Sep 2007;22 Suppl 8:viii2-viii4. [Medline].

  76. Schepke M, Appenrodt B, Heller J, Zielinski J, Sauerbruch T. Prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD: results of a prospective study. Liver Int. Sep 2006;26(7):834-9. [Medline].

  77. Schrier RW, Arroyo V, Bernardi M, Epstein M, Henriksen JH, Rodes J. Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology. Sep-Oct 1988;8(5):1151-7. [Medline].

  78. Sen S, Williams R, Jalan R. Emerging indications for albumin dialysis. Am J Gastroenterol. Feb 2005;100(2):468-75. [Medline].

  79. Senzolo M, Cholongitas E, Tibballs J, Burroughs A, Patch D. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of ascites and hepatorenal syndrome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Nov 2006;18(11):1143-50. [Medline].

  80. Singh N, Gayowski T, Yu VL, Wagener MM. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. Apr 15 1995;122(8):595-8. [Medline].

  81. Solanki P, Chawla A, Garg R, Gupta R, Jain M, Sarin SK. Beneficial effects of terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2003;18(2):152-6. [Medline].

  82. Sort P, Navasa M, Arroyo V, Aldeguer X, Planas R, Ruiz-del-Arbol L, et al. Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med. Aug 5 1999;341(6):403-9. [Medline].

  83. [Best Evidence] Tandon P, Bain VG, Tsuyuki RT, Klarenbach S. Systematic review: renal and other clinically relevant outcomes in hepatorenal syndrome trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. May 1 2007;25(9):1017-28. [Medline].

  84. Testro AG, Wongseelashote S, Angus PW, Gow PJ. Long-term outcome of patients treated with terlipressin for types 1 and 2 hepatorenal syndrome. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Sep 3 2007;[Medline].

  85. Thabut D, Massard J, Gangloff A, Carbonell N, Francoz C, Nguyen-Khac E, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease score and systemic inflammatory response are major prognostic factors in patients with cirrhosis and acute functional renal failure. Hepatology. Dec 2007;46(6):1872-82. [Medline].

  86. Turban S, Thuluvath PJ, Atta MG. Hepatorenal syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14 2007;13(30):4046-55. [Medline].

  87. Verma S, Ajudia K, Mendler M, Redeker A. Prevalence of septic events, type 1 hepatorenal syndrome, and mortality in severe alcoholic hepatitis and utility of discriminant function and MELD score in predicting these adverse events. Dig Dis Sci. Sep 2006;51(9):1637-43. [Medline].

  88. Wong F, Moore K, Dingemanse J, Jalan R. Lack of renal improvement with nonselective endothelin antagonism with tezosentan in type 2 hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology. Jan 2008;47(1):160-8. [Medline].

  89. Zusman RM, Axelrod L, Tolkoff-Rubin N. The treatment of the hepatorenal syndrome with intra-renal administration of prostaglandin E1. Prostaglandins. May 1977;13(5):819-30. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

HRS, hepato-renal syndrome, acute renal failure, renal dysfunction, renal disorder, chronic liver disease, liver failure, fulminant hepatitis, ascites, portal hypertension, cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, liver transplantation, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, RAAS, sympathetic nervous system, SNS, renal prostaglandins, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, SBP, renal vasoconstriction, renal hypoperfusion, type 1 HRS, type 2 HRS

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Hemant K Roy, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University, Evanston-Northwestern Healthcare
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rowen K Zetterman, MD, Chief, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Omaha; Director of Clinical Operation, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Rowen K Zetterman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Gastroenterological Association, American Medical Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Ann Ouyang, MBBS, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Oscar S Brann, MD, FACP, Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego; Consulting Staff, Mecklenburg Medical Group
Oscar S Brann, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP, Assistant Dean for Medical Curriculum, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, and Society of General Internal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Julian Katz, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the Medical College of Pennsylvania
Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law Medicine and Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.