Irinotecan Toxicity and UGT1A 

  • Author: Ali Torkamani, PhD; Chief Editor: Bruce Buehler, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 28, 2012
 

Overview

Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor used to treat several solid tumor types, especially in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Inhibition of topoisomerase I by irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, prevents re-ligation of single-stranded DNA breaks induced during the DNA synthesis phase of cellular replication. Because the ensuing double-stranded DNA damage is not repaired efficiently, cell death ultimately occurs.

Adverse effects of irinotecan treatment include severe diarrhea, myelosuppression, and neutropenia. These effects are likely induced by inefficient metabolism and excretion of SN-38, which undergoes glucuronidation primarily in the liver by UGT1A prior to excretion through the kidneys.[1, 2]

The UGT1A locus is alternatively spliced to produce 9 isoenzymes. These isoenzymes are responsible for the phase II metabolism of numerous endogenous and exogenous compounds by glucuronidation, which solubilizes compounds for excretion through the kidneys. The UGT1A1 isoform is solely responsible for the metabolism of bilirubin, numerous endogenous hormones, and numerous pharmacologic compounds, including irinotecan. Thus, genetic variation in UGT1A correlates with adverse events caused by irinotecan toxicity.[3]

Many UGT1A1 variants have been described, a few of which can have a significant impact on irinotecan metabolism and toxicity. UGT1A1*28, the most well-characterized variant, is a TA repeat expansion in the promoter of UGT1A1, most commonly increasing the number of TA dinucleotides from 6 to 7 repeats. This variant causes reduced levels of UGT1A1 gene expression. UGT1A1*28 occurs at high frequency in white and African populations (26% to 31% and 42 to 56%, respectively) and at lower but appreciable frequency in Asian populations (9% to 16%).[4, 5] Two other promoter variants known to lower UGT1A1 levels include UGT1A1*60 and UGT1A1*93. These variants occur at significant frequency in many populations (>10%). Both variants occur at a frequency of greater than 30% in white populations, and UGT1A1*60 occurs at an estimated frequency of 83% in Japanese populations.[6, 7]

UGT1A1*6 G71R, a nonsynonymous variant also known to reduce UGT1A1 activity, occurs at a frequency of 13% to 32% in Asian populations, but at very low frequency in other populations. Another nonsynonymous variant observed in Asian populations, UGT1A1*27 P229Q, occurs at even lower frequency (< 3%), but almost completely abolishes UGT1A1 activity.[8, 9] Two other promoter variants, UGT1A1*36 and UGT1A1*37, increase expression levels of UGT1A1 and occur at appreciable frequencies in African populations (3% to 10% and 2% to 7%, respectively).[4, 5]

Next

Clinical Implications

The role of routine testing for the presence of germline isoforms of UGT1A remains unsettled. Evidence indicates that, at relatively high irinotecan dose levels (>250 mg/m2), patients who are homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 variant experience a greater risk of clinically important neutropenia.[10] However, at the lower doses of irinotecan (100-125 mg/m2) that are most commonly used in the practice setting, the negative impact of UGT1A1*28 is far more modest and of questionable clinical relevance.[10]

Further complicating this issue are data demonstrating that irinotecan combined with particular chemotherapy agents (eg, oxaliplatin) may cause excessive neutropenia in the presence of this specific genetic variant. However, this complication does not occur when other agents (eg, 5-fluorouracil) are added.[11] In addition, other variants may potentially impact outcome in patients receiving irinotecan-based chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.[12]

Given this uncertainty, for patients scheduled to receive a high-dose irinotecan regimen, or one that combines irinotecan with oxaliplatin, it is reasonable (but not absolutely mandatory) to determine the UGT1A genetic background to assist in toxicity management.

Previous
Next

Testing for the Genetic Mutation

Commercial testing for the UGT1A1*28 variant, which determines the number of TA repeats in the UGT1A1 promoter, is available. Repeat length is inversely correlated with UGT1A1 expression levels and, thus, correlated with risk of toxicity.

Genotyping tests are available through the following companies:

ARUP Laboratories

LabCorp

Genzyme Genetics

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Ali Torkamani, PhD  Director of Drug Discovery, The Scripps Translational Science Institute; Assistant Professor of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Maurie Markman, MD  Vice President for Medical Oncology Services, National Director for Medical Oncology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America

Maurie Markman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Eli Lilly Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Genentech Consulting fee Consulting; Cellgene Consulting fee Consulting; Hana Pharmaceuticals Consulting fee Consulting; Boehringer Ingelheim Consulting fee Consulting; Ortho Biotech Consulting fee Consulting; Morphotech Consulting; Amgen Consulting fee Consulting

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Bruce Buehler, MD  Professor, Department of Pediatrics and Genetics, Director RSA, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Bruce Buehler, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association on Mental Retardation, American College of Medical Genetics, American College of Physician Executives, American Medical Association, and Nebraska Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Iyer L, King CD, Whitington PF, Green MD, Roy SK, Tephly TR, et al. Genetic predisposition to the metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Role of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 in the glucuronidation of its active metabolite (SN-38) in human liver microsomes. J Clin Invest. Feb 15 1998;101(4):847-54. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Gupta E, Lestingi TM, Mick R, Ramirez J, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ. Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: correlation of glucuronidation with diarrhea. Cancer Res. Jul 15 1994;54(14):3723-5. [Medline].

  3. Innocenti F, Undevia SD, Iyer L, Chen PX, Das S, Kocherginsky M, et al. Genetic variants in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene predict the risk of severe neutropenia of irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. Apr 15 2004;22(8):1382-8. [Medline].

  4. Hall D, Ybazeta G, Destro-Bisol G, Petzl-Erler ML, Di Rienzo A. Variability at the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter in human populations and primates. Pharmacogenetics. Oct 1999;9(5):591-9. [Medline].

  5. Beutler E, Gelbart T, Demina A. Racial variability in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1A1) promoter: a balanced polymorphism for regulation of bilirubin metabolism?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul 7 1998;95(14):8170-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Sugatani J, Yamakawa K, Yoshinari K, Machida T, Takagi H, Mori M, et al. Identification of a defect in the UGT1A1 gene promoter and its association with hyperbilirubinemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Mar 29 2002;292(2):492-7. [Medline].

  7. Innocenti F, Grimsley C, Das S, Ramírez J, Cheng C, Kuttab-Boulos H, et al. Haplotype structure of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 promoter in different ethnic groups. Pharmacogenetics. Dec 2002;12(9):725-33. [Medline].

  8. Akaba K, Kimura T, Sasaki A, Tanabe S, Ikegami T, Hashimoto M, et al. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and mutation of the bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase gene: a common missense mutation among Japanese, Koreans and Chinese. Biochem Mol Biol Int. Sep 1998;46(1):21-6. [Medline].

  9. Gagné JF, Montminy V, Belanger P, Journault K, Gaucher G, Guillemette C. Common human UGT1A polymorphisms and the altered metabolism of irinotecan active metabolite 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). Mol Pharmacol. Sep 2002;62(3):608-17. [Medline].

  10. Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, de Boer A, et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte--an update of guidelines. Clin Pharmacol Ther. May 2011;89(5):662-73. [Medline].

  11. McLeod HL, Sargent DJ, Marsh S, Green EM, King CR, Fuchs CS, et al. Pharmacogenetic predictors of adverse events and response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: results from North American Gastrointestinal Intergroup Trial N9741. J Clin Oncol. Jul 10 2010;28(20):3227-33. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. Cecchin E, Innocenti F, D'Andrea M, Corona G, De Mattia E, Biason P, et al. Predictive role of the UGT1A1, UGT1A7, and UGT1A9 genetic variants and their haplotypes on the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan. J Clin Oncol. May 20 2009;27(15):2457-65. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.