Intestinal Motility Disorders Workup

  • Author: Nafisa K Kuwajerwala, MD; Chief Editor: Julian Katz, MD   more...
 
Updated: Feb 23, 2012
 

Approach Considerations

A complete workup should be performed to exclude an organic cause for the patient’s symptoms (eg, myxedema, dynamic bowel obstruction, or malignancy, which are eminently treatable conditions). Only after the complete workup has been carried out can the patient be deemed to have a functional problem.

Workup may include laboratory studies, diagnostic imaging, manometry, electromyography (EMG), endoscopy, and diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy.[11]

Next

Laboratory Studies

Routine laboratory examinations are not very useful for diagnosing primitive intestinal motility disorders, except pseudo-obstructive attacks. However, laboratory studies may be helpful for diagnosing motility disorders of the gut due to intestinal cancers or irritable bowel disease.

The complete blood count (CBC) is usually altered in patients with intestinal cancers (in whom it may show anemia) and in patients with irritable bowel disease (in whom leukocytosis is the more frequent result). In such patients, the protein electrophoresis pattern may show alterations of both albumin and globulins (especially alpha-1 and gamma globulins).

Electrolyte imbalance is common in patients with intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Serum levels of triiodothyronine, thyroxine, and glucose are also altered in these patients. Vitamin B-12 levels are reduced in persons with malabsorption. Transaminase levels can be altered in patients with liver metastases. A stool sample should be sent for analysis if the diagnosis of steatorrhea from small bowel bacterial overgrowth is suggested.

Tumor markers may be studied in patients who may have cancer of the digestive system. The most useful tumor markers for these patients are carbohydrate antigen 19-9, cancer antigen 125, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CEA is nonspecific but is useful in follow-up evaluations. Alpha-fetoprotein evaluation may help detect liver involvement by metastases from intestinal cancers.

Urinalysis is not useful in establishing a diagnosis of an intestinal motility disorder.

Previous
Next

Radiography and Scintigraphy

Plain radiographic films of the abdomen may show bowel blockage (without any actual mechanical bowel obstruction) in patients with intestinal pseudo-obstruction, but findings are usually negative in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or constipation (see the image below).

Dilated cecum (16 cm) and colon in patient with psDilated cecum (16 cm) and colon in patient with pseudocolonic obstruction.

A barium meal is a helpful study in the diagnosis of intestinal motility disorders, but it should never be administered to patients with symptoms of pseudo-obstruction, because it may cause irreversible blockage of intestinal transit. It may show a delay in transit time in persons with constipation, or the results may be normal in patients with IBS.

Computed tomography (CT) and nuclear magnetic resonance examinations are expensive and should be reserved for patients with possible intestinal malignancy.

Although defecography offers some information about the kinetics of rectal emptying, scintigraphic study of the small bowel or colonic transit time is currently preferred. Radionuclide gastric emptying tests are also performed when needed. Scintigraphic study of intestinal transit time, accomplished by oral administration of radiolabeled foods, allows study of gastric emptying and intestinal progression of the meal. It is not helpful in the diagnosis of patients with possible intestinal cancer.[12]

Previous
Next

Manometry and Electromyography

Rectal manometry, a procedure for measuring the intestinal pressure exerted by the muscles of the pelvic floor, may provide some important information in patients with intestinal motility disorders, especially in those with fecal incontinence. Esophageal or gastroduodenal manometry or cystometrography may be performed as indicated.

EMG of the pelvic floor yields information about nervous conduction and muscle function, though it is not very accurate. Such information makes it possible to distinguish between functional and organic disorders of defecation.

Previous
Next

Endoscopy

Endoscopy usually provides information about morphologic and functional patterns of the digestive tract. Perform endoscopic studies of the upper and lower digestive tracts in any patient with an intestinal motility disorder because, in most of these patients, dysmotility has been described in the whole digestive tract.

A rectal mucosal or full-thickness biopsy may be useful in helping to diagnose amyloidosis or pathologic abnormalities of the muscularis propria or the nerve plexus (myopathies and neuropathies). Echoendoscopy may provide additional information about the muscular layer of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Previous
Next

Diagnostic Laparoscopy or Laparotomy

Diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy, with full-thickness biopsy or resection, and immunohistochemistry can be performed to assess for c-kit –positive cells. A full-thickness biopsy sample of the small intestine can be obtained via laparoscopy, with or without a feeding jejunostomy tube. Full-thickness biopsy specimens should be examined for muscle disease, inflammatory infiltrates of the myenteric plexus, neuronal intranuclear and intracytoplasmic inclusions, neuronal destruction, and absent or deficient c-kit immunoreactivity.

If laparotomy is performed, specimens should be taken from 2 sites, with tissue obtained from dilated and nondilated segments of intestine and processed for conventional light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Because of their functional origin, no specific histologic pattern has been associated with primary intestinal motility disorders. Some sort of molecular damage in muscle fibers of the digestive tracct is thought to occur, or intrinsic innervation (enteric nervous system) may cause motor incoordination as a result of alterations of migrating myoelectric complexes.

Testing of c-kit immunoreactivity is used to assess the volume of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Literature suggests that a decrease in the volume of these cells is associated with slow transit of the bowel.[13, 14, 15, 16]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Nafisa K Kuwajerwala, MD  Staff Surgeon, Breast Care Center, William Beaumont Hospital

Nafisa K Kuwajerwala, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Society of Breast Disease, and American Society of Breast Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Venkata Subramanian Kanthimathinathan, MD  Fellow in Bariatric/Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, University of Missouri Healthcare

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Luigi Santacroce, MD  Assistant Professor, Medical School, State University at Bari, Italy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vivek V Gumaste, MD  Associate Professor of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine of New York University; Adjunct Clinical Assistant, Mount Sinai Hospital; Director, Division of Gastroenterology, City Hospital Center

Vivek V Gumaste, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Julian Katz, MD  Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine

Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Silvia Gagliardi, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Medical Center Vita, Italy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Douglas M Heuman, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF Chief of GI, Hepatology, and Nutrition at North Shore University Hospital/Long Island Jewish Medical Center; Professor, Department of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine

Douglas M Heuman, MD, FACP, FACG, AGAF is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Physicians, and American Gastroenterological Association

Disclosure: Novartis Grant/research funds Other; Bayer Grant/research funds Other; Otsuka Grant/research funds None; Bristol Myers Squibb Grant/research funds Other; Scynexis None None; Salix Grant/research funds Other; MannKind Other

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Merck Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Ikaria Pharmaceuticals Honoraria Board membership

Shivkumar Prabhu, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Internal Medicine, St John Detroit Riverview Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Daniel Schafer Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Di Lorenzo C, Youssef NN. Diagnosis and management of intestinal motility disorders. Semin Pediatr Surg. Feb 2010;19(1):50-8. [Medline].

  2. Keller J, Layer P. Intestinal and anorectal motility and functional disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(3):407-23. [Medline].

  3. Venkatasubramani N, Sood MR. Motility disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Indian J Pediatr. Oct 2006;73(10):927-30. [Medline].

  4. Ouyang A, Locke GR 3rd. Overview of neurogastroenterology-gastrointestinal motility and functional GI disorders: classification, prevalence, and epidemiology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Sep 2007;36(3):485-98, vii. [Medline].

  5. Rao SS. Constipation: evaluation and treatment of colonic and anorectal motility disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Sep 2007;36(3):687-711, x. [Medline].

  6. De Giorgio R, Cogliandro RF, Barbara G, Corinaldesi R, Stanghellini V. Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction: clinical features, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Dec 2011;40(4):787-807. [Medline].

  7. Rudolph CD, Hyman PE, Altschuler SM, Christensen J, Colletti RB, Cucchiara S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction in children: report of consensus workshop. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Jan 1997;24(1):102-12. [Medline].

  8. Knowles CH, Martin JE. Slow transit constipation: a model of human gut dysmotility. Review of possible aetiologies. Neurogastroenterol Motil. Apr 2000;12(2):181-96. [Medline].

  9. Amiot A, Tchikviladze M, Joly F, et al. Frequency of mitochondrial defects in patients with chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Gastroenterology. Jul 2009;137(1):101-9. [Medline].

  10. Li B, Wang JR, Ma YL. Bowel sounds and monitoring gastrointestinal motility in critically ill patients. Clin Nurse Spec. Jan 2012;26(1):29-34. [Medline].

  11. Remes-Troche JM, Rao SS. Diagnostic testing in patients with chronic constipation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. Oct 2006;8(5):416-24. [Medline].

  12. Maqbool S, Parkman HP, Friedenberg FK. Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit. Dig Dis Sci. Oct 2009;54(10):2167-74. [Medline].

  13. Burns AJ. Disorders of interstitial cells of Cajal. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Dec 2007;45 Suppl 2:S103-6. [Medline].

  14. He CL, Burgart L, Wang L, Pemberton J, Young-Fadok T, Szurszewski J, et al. Decreased interstitial cell of cajal volume in patients with slow-transit constipation. Gastroenterology. Jan 2000;118(1):14-21. [Medline].

  15. Pardi DS, Miller SM, Miller DL, Burgart LJ, Szurszewski JH, Lennon VA, et al. Paraneoplastic dysmotility: loss of interstitial cells of Cajal. Am J Gastroenterol. Jul 2002;97(7):1828-33. [Medline].

  16. Sanders KM. Interstitial cells of Cajal at the clinical and scientific interface. J Physiol. Nov 1 2006;576(Pt 3):683-7. [Medline].

  17. Cleveland Clinical Foundation, Center for Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders. Intestinal motility disorders. Available at: http://www.ccf.org/gastro/motility/default.htm. Cleveland, Ohio: Cleveland Clinic;. 1999. [Full Text].

  18. Fu A. Neostigmine: an alternative treatment for constipation. Dynamics. 2005;16(1):13-5. [Medline].

  19. Karamanolis G, Tack J. Promotility medications--now and in the future. Dig Dis. 2006;24(3-4):297-307. [Medline].

  20. Sarna SK. Molecular, functional, and pharmacological targets for the development of gut promotility drugs. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. Oct 2006;291(4):G545-55. [Medline].

  21. Quigley EM. Prucalopride: safety, efficacy and potential applications. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. Jan 2012;5(1):23-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  22. Mazzone A, Farrugia G. Evolving concepts in the cellular control of gastrointestinal motility: neurogastroenterology and enteric sciences. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Sep 2007;36(3):499-513, vii. [Medline].

  23. Sigurdsson L, Reyes J, Kocoshis SA, et al. Intestinal transplantation in children with chronic intestinal pseudo- obstruction. Gut. Oct 1999;45(4):570-4. [Medline].

  24. Millar AJ, Gupte G, Sharif K. Intestinal transplantation for motility disorders. Semin Pediatr Surg. Nov 2009;18(4):258-62. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Dilated cecum (16 cm) and colon in patient with pseudocolonic obstruction.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.