eMedicine Specialties > Gastroenterology > Pancreas
Pancreatitis, Acute: Follow-up
Updated: Jun 10, 2008
Follow-up
Further Inpatient Care
- Further inpatient care depends on whether any of the complications of severe pancreatitis develop and how well patients respond to treatment. This ranges from a few days to several months of intensive care.
- Patients can be discharged when their pain is well controlled with oral analgesia, they are able to tolerate an oral diet that maintains their caloric needs, and all complications have been addressed adequately.
Further Outpatient Care
- Once the patient is stable enough to be discharged from the hospital, routine clinical follow-up care is needed to monitor for potential complications of the pancreatitis, especially pseudocysts.
- No evidence-based guidelines have been established for outpatient follow-up care. Generally, a reasonable time to see the patient is within 7-10 days from the date of hospital discharge to evaluate how he or she is doing and to check for signs or symptoms of complications. If the pancreatitis was moderate to severe and associated with peripancreatic fluid collections, subsequent imaging studies are indicated to determine if a pseudocyst has developed.
Transfer
- No evidence-based guidelines have been established to indicate when a patient should be transferred to a more experienced or skilled medical center. Nevertheless, if severe acute pancreatitis is suggested by the Atlanta Criteria or by a CRP level greater than 10 mg/dL, a Ranson score of 4 or greater, or an APACHE II score of 9 or greater, it is appropriate to consider transfer to an institution where an intensivist staffs the critical care unit and an interested subspecialist experienced in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis is available.
Deterrence/Prevention
- When the cause of pancreatitis can be determined, prevention depends on preventing the etiologic agent from causing subsequent episodes.
- In patients with documented gallstone pancreatitis, and probably in those with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis, a cholecystectomy is required.
- In patients who abuse alcohol, a dedicated person (eg, physician, psychologist, addiction counselor) who can help the patient overcome the addiction to alcohol is required.
- When an uncommon cause of pancreatitis is identified, the path of prevention is specific to the etiology.
Complications
- Acute fluid collections
- These commonly occur early in the course of acute pancreatitis.
- They are primarily detected by imaging studies and not physical examination.
- Because they lack a defined wall and usually regress spontaneously, most acute fluid collections require no specific therapy.
- Pseudocyst
- This is a collection of pancreatic fluid enclosed by a wall of granulation tissue and requires 4 or more weeks to develop.
- While they are sometimes palpable on physical examination, they are usually detected with abdominal ultrasonography or CT scanning.
- Intra-abdominal infections
- Within the first 1-3 weeks, fluid collections or pancreatic necrosis can become infected and jeopardize clinical outcome.
- From 3-6 weeks, pseudocysts may become infected or a pancreatic abscess may develop. A pancreatic abscess is a circumscribed intra-abdominal collection of pus, within or in proximity to the pancreas. It is believed to arise from localized necrosis, with subsequent liquefaction that becomes infected.
- Intestinal florae are the predominant source of bacteria causing the infection. The usual suspects are Escherichia coli (26%), Pseudomonas species (16%), Staphylococcus species (15%), Klebsiella species (10%), Proteus species (10%), Streptococcus species (4%), Enterobacter species (3%), and anaerobic organisms (16%).
- Fungal superinfections may occur weeks or months into the course of severe necrotizing pancreatitis.
- Pancreatic necrosis
- This is a nonviable area of pancreatic parenchyma that is often associated with peripancreatic fat necrosis and is principally diagnosed with the aid of dynamic spiral CT scans.
- Distinguishing between infected and sterile pancreatic necrosis is an ongoing clinical challenge.
- Sterile pancreatic necrosis is usually treated with aggressive medical management, whereas almost all patients with infected pancreatic necrosis require surgical debridement or percutaneous drainage if they are to survive.
Prognosis
- Clinical assessment and prognostication
- Identifying patients in greatest need of aggressive medical treatment by differentiating their disease severity as mild or severe is recommended.
- In mild disease, the pancreas exhibits interstitial edema, an inflammatory infiltrate without hemorrhage or necrosis, and, usually, minimal or no organ dysfunction.
- In severe disease, the inflammatory infiltrate is severe, associated with necrosis of the parenchyma, often accompanied by evidence of severe gland dysfunction, and it may be associated with multiorgan system failure.
- Several clinical scoring systems (eg, Ranson criteria, Glasgow, Imrie) are available. The APACHE II scoring system, though cumbersome, appears to be the best validated.
- Biological markers
- The most widely available marker is the hematocrit value. Admission hemoconcentration to a hematocrit value greater than 47% had been reported as a sensitive marker to predict pancreatic necrosis at admission. However, subsequent study has revealed admission hematocrit to be useful only as a negative predictor for necrosis in patients without hemoconcentration.
- CRP, an acute-phase reactant released in response to interleukin-6, is a useful marker at 36-48 hours.
- Interleukin-6 levels begin to rise in the first several hours of pancreatitis, stimulating the release of CRP. Early studies appear promising, indicating that this may be a reliable indicator of severity. This is not yet validated and not yet commercially available for clinical use.
- Genetic markers: Polymorphisms in the chemokine monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) gene may play a role in predisposing patients to severe acute pancreatitis, although this marker is still under investigation and is not used clinically.
Patient Education
- For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Liver, Gallbladder, and Pancreas Center and Cholesterol Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Gallstones.
Miscellaneous
Medicolegal Pitfalls
- Serum amylase and lipase levels can be elevated in patients with brain injury (eg, cerebrovascular accident, brain trauma).
- These patients are generally cared for in an intensive care unit and require mechanical ventilation.
- Pancreatic enzyme elevations may rise and fall dangerously over many days to weeks. The elevation is believed to result from the hyperstimulation of the pancreas from a central mechanism, but no evidence of acute pancreatitis is present on imaging studies.
- Failure to identify disease severity can be an area of medical/legal hazard. Recognizing patients with severe acute pancreatitis as soon as possible is critical to achieving optimal outcomes.
- Patients should not have ERCP in the setting of acute pancreatitis unless they (1) are clinically worsening and have suspected gallstone pancreatitis, or (2) have increasing obstructive liver tests with known choledocholithiasis. Otherwise, ERCP should be avoided in all patients with acute pancreatitis.
- Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare condition. Corticosteroids should not be used to treat this condition in the short term in patients who are suspected of having autoimmune pancreatitis and who present with acute pancreatitis.
Special Concerns
- Recurrent acute pancreatitis can be a challenging clinical problem. First, seek to determine the etiology using modalities that subject the patient to the least risk while simultaneously assessing for treatable causes.
- Abdominal CT scanning is a reasonable first approach. If neoplasia or chronic pancreatitis is found, it must be addressed and treated accordingly.
- If the CT scan is not diagnostic, order MRCP. If this shows developmental abnormalities, strictures, or evidence of chronic pancreatitis, remember that endoscopic or surgical treatment may be of benefit in a subset of patients.
- If the MRCP findings are normal, further evaluation by EUS is indicated. This has a better sensitivity for detecting biliary sludge and microlithiasis, which are probably the most common causes of recurrent idiopathic pancreatitis. EUS may also help detect periampullary lesions missed by abdominal CT scanning or MRCP.
- If prior studies showed evidence of microlithiasis or biliary sludge, a cholecystectomy is indicated. If the patient has already had a cholecystectomy or if pancreatitis recurs, further evaluation by ERCP is indicated. This may reveal papillary stenosis, in which case a pancreatic and, possibly, biliary sphincterotomy are indicated.
- The role of genetic testing is emerging, and whether testing for cationic trypsinogen mutations, SPINK1 mutations, or CFTR mutations should be performed remains unclear, because no effective treatment currently exists for these diseases.
- If recurrent pancreatitis continues, ERCP with sphincter of Oddi manometry is indicated. This is placed last in the evaluation because patients with suspected SOD (especially resulting from sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia) have a very high rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and creating more iatrogenic complications than cures of recurrent pancreatitis is a concern.
More on Pancreatitis, Acute |
| Overview: Pancreatitis, Acute |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Pancreatitis, Acute |
| Treatment & Medication: Pancreatitis, Acute |
Follow-up: Pancreatitis, Acute |
| Multimedia: Pancreatitis, Acute |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Adams DB, Zellner JL, Anderson MC. Arterial hemorrhage complicating pancreatic pseudocysts: role of angiography. J Surg Res. Feb 1993;54(2):150-6. [Medline].
Ahearne PM, Baillie JM, Cotton PB, Baker ME, Meyers WC, Pappas TN. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. Jan 1992;163(1):111-5; discussion 115-6. [Medline].
Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, Megibow AJ, Caccavale R, Cooper MM. Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology. Sep 1985;156(3):767-72. [Medline].
Balthazar EJ, Robinson DL, Megibow AJ, Ranson JH. Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. Feb 1990;174(2):331-6. [Medline].
Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis: conservative medical management. In: Buchler MW, Halter F, Uhl W, eds. Digestive Surgery. Vol 11. Farmington, Conn: Karger; 1994:220-25.
Banks PA, Freeman ML,. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 2006;101(10):2379-400. [Medline].
Beckingham IJ, Bornman PC. ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas, and biliary system. Acute pancreatitis. BMJ. Mar 10 2001;322(7286):595-8. [Medline].
Beger HG, Bittner R, Block S, Büchler M. Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis. A prospective clinical study. Gastroenterology. Aug 1986;91(2):433-8. [Medline].
Berk JE. Management of acute pancreatitis: critical assessment. Keio J Med. Sep 1995;44(3):93. [Medline].
Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. May 1993;128(5):586-90. [Medline].
Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Schmalz MJ. Pancreatic pseudocyst (PPC) treatment with pancreatic duct endoprosthesis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:102.
Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Takahashi N, Zhang L. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Aug 2006;4(8):1010-6; quiz 934. [Medline].
Cremer M, Deviere J, Engelholm L. Endoscopic management of cysts and pseudocysts in chronic pancreatitis: long-term follow-up after 7 years of experience. Gastrointest Endosc. Jan-Feb 1989;35(1):1-9. [Medline].
Domínguez-Munoz JE, Carballo F, García MJ, Miguel de Diego J, Gea F, Yangüela J, et al. Monitoring of serum proteinase--antiproteinase balance and systemic inflammatory response in prognostic evaluation of acute pancreatitis. Results of a prospective multicenter study. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 1993;38(3):507-13. [Medline].
Eatock FC, Chong P, Menezes N, Murray L, McKay CJ, Carter CR. A randomized study of early nasogastric versus nasojejunal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. Feb 2005;100(2):432-9. [Medline].
Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, Lo CM, Zheng SS, Wong J. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med. Jan 28 1993;328(4):228-32. [Medline].
Gan SI, Romagnuolo J. Admission hematocrit: a simple, useful and early predictor of severe pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. Nov-Dec 2004;49(11-12):1946-52. [Medline].
Goldstein F, Kucer FT, Thornton JJ 3rd, Abramson J. Acute and relapsing pancreatitis caused by bile pigment aggregates and diagnosed by biliary drainage. Am J Gastroenterol. Sep 1980;74(3):225-30. [Medline].
Grace PA, Williamson RC. Modern management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Br J Surg. May 1993;80(5):573-81. [Medline].
Guelrud M, Siegel JH. Hypertensive pancreatic duct sphincter as a cause of pancreatitis. Successful treatment with hydrostatic balloon dilatation. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 1984;29(3):225-31. [Medline].
Havala T, Shronts E, Cerra F. Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Sep 1989;18(3):525-42. [Medline].
Imrie CW. Indications for surgery in acute pancreatitis. Dig Surg. 1994;11:242-4.
Jacobson E, Assareh H, Cannerfelt R, Anderson RE, Jakobsson JG. The postoperative analgesic effects of intra-articular levobupivacaine in elective day-case arthroscopy of the knee: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Feb 2006;14(2):120-4. [Medline].
Karjalainen J, Airo I, Nordback I. Routine early endoscopic cholangiography, sphincterotomy and removal of common duct stones in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Eur J Surg. Oct 1992;158(10):549-53. [Medline].
Kelly TR, Wagner DS. Gallstone pancreatitis: a prospective randomized trial of the timing of surgery. Surgery. Oct 1988;104(4):600-5. [Medline].
Khan Z, Vlodov J, Horovitz J, Jose RM, Iswara K, Smotkin J. Urinary trypsinogen activation peptide is more accurate than hematocrit in determining severity in patients with acute pancreatitis: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. Aug 2002;97(8):1973-7. [Medline].
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. Oct 1985;13(10):818-29. [Medline].
Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Freeny PC, Ryan JA, Traverso LW. Endoscopic transpapillary therapy for disrupted pancreatic duct and peripancreatic fluid collections. Gastroenterology. May 1991;100(5 Pt 1):1362-70. [Medline].
Lankisch PG, Mahlke R, Blum T, Bruns A, Bruns D, Maisonneuve P. Hemoconcentration: an early marker of severe and/or necrotizing pancreatitis? A critical appraisal. Am J Gastroenterol. Jul 2001;96(7):2081-5. [Medline].
Lee SP, Nicholls JF, Park HZ. Biliary sludge as a cause of acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. Feb 27 1992;326(9):589-93. [Medline].
Lumsden A, Bradley EL 3rd. Secondary pancreatic infections. Surg Gynecol Obstet. May 1990;170(5):459-67. [Medline].
Malfertheiner P, Dominguez-Munoz JE. Diagnosis and staging of acute pancreatitis. Dig Surg. 1994;11:198-208.
Mann DV, Hershman MJ, Hittinger R, Glazer G. Multicentre audit of death from acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg. Jun 1994;81(6):890-3. [Medline].
Nathens AB, Curtis JR, Beale RJ, Cook DJ, Moreno RP, Romand JA. Executive summary: management of the critically ill patient with severe acute pancreatitis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2004;1(4):289-90. [Medline].
National Center for Health Statistics. National hospital discharge survey: 2002 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Series Report 13. 2003;No. 158 (PHS 2005-1729):207.
Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, Bailey IA, James D, Fossard DP. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. Oct 29 1988;2(8618):979-83. [Medline].
Neoptolemos JP, Davidson BR, Winder AF, Vallance D. Role of duodenal bile crystal analysis in the investigation of 'idiopathic' pancreatitis. Br J Surg. May 1988;75(5):450-3. [Medline].
Neoptolemos JP, Raraty M, Finch M. Acute pancreatitis: the substantial human and financial costs. Gut. 1988;42(6):886-91.
Okazaki K, Yamamoto Y, Ito K. Endoscopic measurement of papillary sphincter zone and pancreatic main ductal pressure in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. Aug 1986;91(2):409-18. [Medline].
Pandol SJ, Saluja AK, Imrie CW, Banks PA. Acute pancreatitis: bench to the bedside. Gastroenterology. Mar 2007;132(3):1127-51. [Medline].
Pinkas H, Dolan RP, Brady PG. Successful endoscopic transpapillary drainage of an infected pancreatic pseudocyst. Gastrointest Endosc. Jan-Feb 1994;40(1):97-9. [Medline].
Pisters PW, Ranson JH. Nutritional support for acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Sep 1992;175(3):275-84. [Medline].
Ranson J H. Acute pancreatitis. In: Braasch JW, ed. Surgical Disease of the Biliary Tract and Pancreas. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1994:432-72.
Ranson JH. The timing of biliary surgery in acute pancreatitis. Ann Surg. May 1979;189(5):654-63. [Medline].
Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Turner JW. Prognostic signs and nonoperative peritoneal lavage in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Aug 1976;143(2):209-19. [Medline].
Ros E, Navarro S, Bru C, Garcia-Pugés A, Valderrama R. Occult microlithiasis in 'idiopathic' acute pancreatitis: prevention of relapses by cholecystectomy or ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Gastroenterology. Dec 1991;101(6):1701-9. [Medline].
Rossi R L, Tsao J I. Chronic pancreatitis: complications. In: Surgical Disease of the Biliary Tract and Pancreas. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994:490-504.
Sacks D, Robinson ML. Transgastric percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1988;151(2):303-6. [Medline].
Sahel J. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic cysts. Endoscopy. May 1991;23(3):181-4. [Medline].
Sarr MG. Planned reoperative necrosectomy/debridement of necrotizing acute pancreatitis and delayed primary closure. Dig Surg. 1994;11:252-6.
Schwesinger WH, Page CP, Sirinek KR, Levine BA, Aust JB. Biliary pancreatitis. Operative outcome with a selective approach. Arch Surg. Jul 1991;126(7):836-9; discussion 839-40. [Medline].
Segal I. Controversies in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: alternative therapies to surgery. Gastroenterologist. Mar 1993;1(1):34-8. [Medline].
Smits ME. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:127.
Stanten R, Frey CF. Comprehensive management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis and pancreatic abscess. Arch Surg. Oct 1990;125(10):1269-74; discussion 1274-5. [Medline].
Stelzner M, Pellegrini C. The treatment of gallstone pancreatitis. Adv Surg. 1999;33:163-79. [Medline].
Stoupis C, Becker C, Vock P. Imaging procedures in acute pancreatitis. Dig Surg. 1994;11:209-13.
Toouli J, Roberts-Thomson IC, Dent J, Lee J. Sphincter of Oddi motility disorders in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Br J Surg. Nov 1985;72(11):859-63. [Medline].
Traverson LW. Infections complicating severe pancreatitis. Infec Dis Clin North Am. 1992;6:601-11.
Uhl W, Schrag HJ, Buchler MW. Acute pancreatitis: Necrosectomy and closed continuous lavage of the retroperitoneum. Dig Surg. 1994;11:245-51.
Whitcomb DC. Clinical practice. Acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. May 18 2006;354(20):2142-50. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
pancreas, pancreatic enzymes, pancreastasis, pancreatic autodigestion, abdominal pain, elevated pancreatic enzyme levels, inflammation of the pancreas, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ERCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, MRCP, endoscopic ultrasound, zymogen granules, alcohol abuse, alcohol dependence, alcoholism, alcoholics, biliary disease, biliary tract disease
Follow-up: Pancreatitis, Acute