Diagnostic Liver Biopsy
- Author: Kenneth Ingram, PA-C; Chief Editor: Julian Katz, MD more...
Practiced since the late 19th century, liver biopsy remains the criterion standard in the evaluation of the etiology and extent of disease of the liver. Paul Ehrlich performed a percutaneous liver biopsy in Germany in 1883. In the late 1950s, Menghini developed a 1-second aspiration technique, which led to wider use of the procedure and broadened its applications.
Since Menghini, the evolution of liver biopsy has been extensive. At present, percutaneous biopsies are performed primarily by specialists in gastroenterology/hepatology or by radiologists.
A variety of approaches may be utilized for obtaining a liver tissue specimen. These include a blind percutaneous approach after percussion of the chest wall, biopsy under the guidance of ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT), intravascular tissue sampling via the hepatic vein, and intra-abdominal biopsy at laparoscopy or laparotomy. An endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach has been described.
The choice of one technique over another is based on availability, personal preference, and the clinical situation. Likewise, various needles are available for use, depending on the approach and on physician experience.
Some controversy remains as to what constitutes an adequate liver biopsy sample for accurate evaluation. In general, a sample that is 1.5 cm long and 1.2-2 mm in diameter and contains at least six to eight portal triads is considered adequate. This represents approximately 0.002% of the adult liver. Some hepatologists have advocated the use of 4-cm tissue samples to minimize sampling error, whereas others have found samples of 1 cm to produce minimal interobserver variability.
Although liver biopsy is generally safe and is currently considered the criterion standard for the evaluation of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, sampling error, rare complications, and, occasionally, significant patient anxiety do occur. These factors have led to keen interest in the development of noninvasive tests for hepatic fibrosis,[4, 5] some of which are now commercially available in the United States.
Although these tests hold promise for reducing the need for liver biopsy, most hepatologists feel that their clinical usefulness is limited at this time. The available tests appear to perform well at the extreme ends of the spectrum of chronic liver disease, but results vary considerably in the intermediate stages of disease frequently seen in clinical practice. Lack of validation of these tests in the community settings where they would most likely be used is also a potential shortcoming of the current testing methods.
Liver biopsy, in combination with history and physical examination data, is a powerful clinical tool for diagnosing and treating liver disease. Indications for obtaining a biopsy specimen, divided according to the type of clinical question framed, are as follows:
Evaluation of abnormal hepatic laboratory test results
Confirmation of diagnosis and prognostication
Suspected hepatic neoplasm
Diagnosis of cholestatic liver disease
Evaluation of infiltrative or granulomatous disease
Following a case of liver transplantation to evaluate and manage rejection
To evaluate unexplained jaundice or suspected drug reactions
The biopsy specimen may be used to identify or exclude possible etiologies for physical or laboratory abnormalities. Although various disease states may present similarly, diagnostic histologic patterns exist when used in the context of clinical presentation. For example, infiltration of the hepatic parenchyma by fat may exist in diseases due to alcohol abuse, hepatitis C, diabetes, obesity, or combinations thereof. For each disease state, histologic clues exist that distinguish one from the other.[6, 7, 8]
Liver biopsy plays little role in the determination of the organism responsible for systemic infection because blood cultures generally are revealing. The notable exceptions are intrahepatic tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC).
Another indication for biopsy is the determination of the extent of histologic change present in a biopsy specimen. This involves scoring systems for the degrees of inflammation and fibrosis noted by the pathologist. Many systems exist for describing the microscopic findings, ranging from simplistic to complex. The majority of scoring systems report the degree of inflammation as the grade of the disease and the amount of fibrosis as the stage. An example here would be the finding of moderate inflammation (grade 3) in a specimen from a cirrhotic (stage 4) liver.
The third set of indications is the monitoring of the progression of disease or of treatment efficacy. For example, liver biopsy specimens frequently are used to evaluate and treat rejection following liver transplantation. Repeated biopsies are used less frequently to monitor progression of diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, or alcoholic liver disease.
Regardless of the indication for the biopsy, identifying which information the procedure is anticipated to yield is important.
Contraindications to percutaneous liver biopsy are relatively few, but identifying contraindications is important to avoid the major complications associated with the procedure. Contraindications to liver biopsy include the following:
Pinelo E, Presa J. Outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy: still a good option. Eur J Intern Med. 2009 Sep. 20(5):487-9. [Medline].
Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HS, Stavropoulos SN, Al-Haddad M, Ramesh J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open. 2015 Jun. 3 (3):E210-5. [Medline].
Adeyi O, Fischer SE, Guindi M. Liver allograft pathology: approach to interpretation of needle biopsies with clinicopathological correlation. J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jan. 63(1):47-74. [Medline].
Castera L. Hepatitis B: are non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis reliable?. Liver Int. 2014 Feb. 34 Suppl 1:91-6. [Medline].
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Non-Invasive Methods for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and C: A Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet]. 2015 Jun 22. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Ugiagbe EE, Udoh MO. The histopathological pattern of liver biopsies at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013 Oct-Dec. 16(4):526-9. [Medline].
Costa-Pinho A, Melo RB, Graca L, Lopes JM, Costa-Maia J. Multiple Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumours Diagnosed after Laparoscopic Excisional Biopsy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Aug. 7(8):1730-1731. [Medline].
John A, Al Kaabi S, Soofi ME, Mohannadi M, Kandath SM, Derbala M, et al. Liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease-Is routine real time image guidance unnecessary?. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 19. [Medline].
Flemming JA, Hurlbut DJ, Mussari B, Hookey LC. Liver biopsies for chronic hepatitis C: should nonultrasound-guided biopsies be abandoned?. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun. 23(6):425-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Dohan A, Guerrache Y, Boudiaf M, Gavini JP, Kaci R, Soyer P. Transjugular liver biopsy: Indications, technique and results. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 Sep 2. [Medline].
Jacobs WH, Goldberg SB. Statement on outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Mar. 34 (3):322-3. [Medline].
Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009 Mar. 49 (3):1017-44. [Medline].
Goyal N, Jain N, Rachapalli V, Cochlin DL, Robinson M. Non-invasive evaluation of liver cirrhosis using ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2009 Nov. 64(11):1056-66. [Medline].
Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Nakajima H, et al. Cholangiolocellular carcinoma of the liver: imaging findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Sep-Oct. 33(5):682-8. [Medline].
Mortelé KJ, Peters HE. Multimodality imaging of common and uncommon cystic focal liver lesions. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2009 Oct. 30(5):368-86. [Medline].
Govender P, Jonas MM, Alomari AI, Padua HM, Dillon BJ, Landrigan-Ossar MF, et al. Sonography-guided percutaneous liver biopsies in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep. 201(3):645-50. [Medline].
Reddy KR, Schiff ER. Complications of Liver Biopsy. Taylor MB, ed. Gastrointestinal Emergencies. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
American College of Physicians Guidelines. Amer College of Physicians. American College of Physicians. Clinical Competence in Percutaneous Liver Biopsy.
Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 15. 344(7):495-500. [Medline].
Chiprut RO, Greenwald RA, Morris SJ, Zeppa R, Schiff ER. Intrahepatic hematoma resulting in obstructive jaundice. An unusual complication of liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1978 Jan. 74(1):124-7. [Medline].
Conn HO. Intrahepatic hematoma after liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1974 Aug. 67(2):375-9. [Medline].
Counihan TC, Islam S, Swanson RS. Acute cholecystitis resulting from hemobilia after tru-cut biopsy: a case report and brief review of the literature. Am Surg. 1996 Sep. 62(9):757-8. [Medline].
Firpi RJ, Soldevila-Pico C, Abdelmalek MF, Morelli G, Judah J, Nelson DR. Short recovery time after percutaneous liver biopsy: should we change our current practices?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep. 3(9):926-9. [Medline].
Forssell PL, Bonkowsky HL, Anderson PB, Howell DA. Intrahepatic hematoma after aspiration liver biopsy. A prospective randomized trial using two different needles. Dig Dis Sci. 1981 Jul. 26(7):631-5. [Medline].
Garcia-Tsao G, Boyer JL. Outpatient liver biopsy: how safe is it?. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 15. 118(2):150-3. [Medline].
Gilmore IT, Burroughs A, Murray-Lyon IM, Williams R, Jenkins D, Hopkins A. Indications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: an audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Gut. 1995 Mar. 36(3):437-41. [Medline].
Hederstrom E, Forsberg L, Floren CH, Prytz H. Liver biopsy complications monitored by ultrasound. J Hepatol. 1989 Jan. 8(1):94-8. [Medline].
Janes CH, Lindor KD. Outcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 15. 118(2):96-8. [Medline].
Lichtenstein DR, Kim D, Chopra S. Delayed massive hemobilia following percutaneous liver biopsy: treatment by embolotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Dec. 87(12):1833-8. [Medline].
Mahal AS, Knauer MC, Gregory PB. Bleeding after liver biopsy. Western J Med. 1981. 134:11-14.
McGill DB, Rakela J, Zinsmeister AR, Ott BJ. A 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1990 Nov. 99(5):1396-400. [Medline].
Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol. 1986. 2(2):165-73. [Medline].
Pietrobattista A, Fruwirth R, Natali G, Monti L, Devito R, Nobili V. Is juvenile liver biopsy unsafe? Putting an end to a common misapprehension. Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Sep. 39(9):959-61. [Medline].
Raines DR, Van Heertum RL, Johnson LF. Intrahepatic hematoma: a complication of percutaneous liver biopsy. Gastroenterology. 1974 Aug. 67(2):284-9. [Medline].
Reddy KR, Jeffers LJ. Evaluation of the liver B: Liver biopsy and laparoscopy. Schiff's Diseases of the Liver. 8th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1999. 245-266.
Reichert CM, Weisenthal LM, Klein HG. Delayed hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1983 Jun. 5(3):263-6. [Medline].
Sandbolm P. Hemobilia. Diseases of the Liver. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1993. 1489-1497.
Schiano TD, Azeem S, Bodian CA, et al. Importance of specimen size in accurate needle liver biopsy evaluation of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep. 3(9):930-5. [Medline].
Sugano S, Sumino Y, Hatori T, Mizugami H, Kawafune T, Abei T. Incidence of ultrasound-detected intrahepatic hematomas due to Tru-cut needle liver biopsy. Dig Dis Sci. 1991 Sep. 36(9):1229-33. [Medline].
Van Leuwen DJ, Wilson L, Crowe DR. Liver biopsy in the mid-1990s: questions and answers. Semin Liver Dis. 1995. 15:340-359.