Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Portal Hypertension

  • Author: Jesus Carale, MD; Chief Editor: BS Anand, MD  more...
 
Updated: Nov 07, 2015
 

Practice Essentials

The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. Vascular resistance and blood flow are 2 important factors in its development. The images below depict esophageal varices, which are responsible for the main complication of portal hypertension, massive upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage.

Large esophageal varices with red wale signs seen Large esophageal varices with red wale signs seen on endoscopy. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstr Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstrates multiple serpiginous filling defects primarily involving the lower one third of the esophagus with striking prominence around the gastroesophageal junction. The patient had cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse.

Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of liver disease include the following:

  • Weakness, tiredness, and malaise
  • Anorexia, weight loss (common with acute and chronic liver disease)
  • Sudden and massive bleeding, with or without shock on presentation
  • Nausea and vomiting; abdominal discomfort and pain
  • Jaundice or dark urine
  • Edema and abdominal swelling (ascites); splenomegaly
  • Spider angiomas
  • Males: Gynecomastia, testicular atrophy (common with cirrhosis)
  • Pruritus: Usually associated with cholestatic conditions
  • Spontaneous bleeding and easy bruising
  • Symptoms of encephalopathy: Sleep-wake cycle disturbance; intellectual function deterioration, memory loss, and an inability to communicate effectively at any level; personality changes; and, possibly, displays of inappropriate or bizarre behavior
  • Impotence and sexual dysfunction
  • Muscle cramps (common in patients with cirrhosis), muscle wasting
  • Dupuytren contracture
  • Palmar erythema and leukonychia: May be present in patients with cirrhosis
  • Asterixis ("flapping tremor," "liver flap")

Complications of portal hypertension in patients may present with the following symptoms:

  • Hematemesis or melena: May indicate gastroesophageal variceal bleeding or bleeding from portal gastropathy
  • Mental status changes: May indicate the presence of portosystemic encephalopathy
  • Increasing abdominal girth: May indicate ascites formation
  • Abdominal pain and fever: May indicate spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, although this disease also presents without symptoms
  • Hematochezia: May indicate bleeding from portal colopathy

Signs of portosystemic collateral formation include the following:

  • Anterior abdominal wall dilated veins: May indicate umbilical epigastric vein shunts
  • Venous pattern on the flanks: May indicate portal-parietal peritoneal shunting
  • Caput medusae (tortuous paraumbilical collateral veins)
  • Rectal hemorrhoids
  • Ascites [1]
  • Paraumbilical hernia

Signs of a hyperdynamic circulatory state include the following:

  • Bounding pulses
  • Warm, well-perfused extremities
  • Arterial hypotension
  • Flow murmur over the pericardium

Other signs of portal hypertension and esophageal varices include the following:

  • Pallor: May suggest active internal bleeding
  • Parotid enlargement: May be related to alcohol abuse and/or malnutrition
  • Cyanosis of the tongue, lips, and peripheries: Due to low oxygen saturation
  • Dyspnea and tachypnea
  • Telangiectasis of the skin, lips, and digits
  • Fetor hepaticus: Occurs in portosystemic encephalopathy of any cause (eg, cirrhosis)
  • Small-sized liver
  • Venous hums: Continuous noises audible in patients with portal hypertension; may be present as a result of rapid, turbulent flow in collateral veins
  • Tarry stool (digital rectal examination): Suggests upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
  • Hemorrhoids

See Clinical Presentation for more detail.

Diagnosis

Laboratory testing

  • Complete blood count
  • Liver disease–associated blood tests (eg, aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT], bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase [ALP])
  • Type and cross-match
  • Coagulation studies (prothrombin time [PT], partial thromboplastin time [PTT], international normalized ratio [INR]): Prolonged INR is suggestive of impaired hepatic synthetic function
  • Albumin: hypoalbuminemia is common. (impaired hepatic synthetic function)
  • Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolytes
  • Arterial blood gas (ABG) and pH measurements
  • Hepatic and viral hepatitis serologies, particularly hepatitis B and C serologies

Other laboratory tests may include the following:

  • Antinuclear antibody, antimitochondrial antibody, antismooth muscle antibody
  • Iron indices
  • Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency
  • Ceruloplasmin, 24-hour urinary copper: Consider this test only in individuals aged 3-40 years who have unexplained hepatic, neurologic, or psychiatric disease

Imaging studies

  • Duplex Doppler ultrasonography of the liver and upper abdomen
  • Computed tomography (CT) scanning and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Can be used when ultrasonographic findings are inconclusive
  • Bleeding scan or angiography: Used when bleeding is obscure and the source is unclear

Procedures

  • Liver biopsy and histologic examination
  • Hemodynamic measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG): A criterion standard for assessment of portal hypertension
  • Upper GI endoscopy (or, esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD]): A criterion standard for assessment of portal hypertension

See Workup for more detail.

Management

Treatment is directed at the cause of portal hypertension. Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is the most dramatic and lethal complication of portal hypertension; therefore, the focus is on the treatment of variceal hemorrhage. Management of patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites but without hemorrhage includes a low-sodium diet and diuretics.

Emergent treatment

  • Airway, breathing, and circulation evaluation
  • Nasogastric tube placement with hemodynamically significant upper GI bleeding
  • Nothing by mouth; establish 2 large-bore venous accesses
  • Volume resuscitation, with or without blood product transfusion
  • Portal pressure reduction (ie, anti-secretory agent infusion)
  • Patient transfer to tertiary center with liver transplant service for uncontrolled bleeding from portal hypertension
  • Control and prevention of bleeding from esophageal varices
  • Prevention of complications (eg, prophylactic antibiotics, combination endoscopic/pharmacologic therapy)
  • Administration of vasoconstrictors (eg, octreotide [agent of choice in acute variceal bleeding], vasopressin)
  • Endoscopic therapy (variceal ligation [EVL] [preferred], injection sclerotherapy)
  • Balloon-tube tamponade
  • Percutaneous transhepatic embolization (PTE)
  • Endoscopic administration of cyanoacrylate monomer
  • Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

Primary prophylaxis

  • Surveillance
  • Nonselective beta-blockers (eg, propranolol, nadolol, carvedilol)
  • Vasodilators (eg, isosorbide mononitrate [ISMN])
  • Combination pharmacotherapy when a single agent fails

Secondary prophylaxis

  • Nonselective beta-blockers
  • Endoscopic therapy (EVL, treatment of choice; endoscopic sclerotherapy)
  • Combination EVL and pharmacotherapy

Surgery has no role in primary prophylaxis. Consider procedures, such as the following, for the prevention of rebleeding when pharmacologic and/or endoscopic therapy have failed:

  • Portosystemic shunts
  • Devascularization procedures
  • Orthotopic liver transplantation: Treatment of choice for advanced liver disease

See Treatment and Medication for more detail.

Next

Background

Many conditions are associated with portal hypertension, with cirrhosis being the most common cause of this disorder.

Two important factors—vascular resistance and blood flow—exist in the development of portal hypertension. Ohm law is V = IR, where V is voltage, I is current, and R is resistance. This can be applied to vascular flow; ie, P = FR, where P is the pressure gradient through the portal venous system, F is the volume of blood flowing through the system, and R is the resistance to flow. Changes in either F or R affect the pressure, although in most types of portal hypertension, both of these are altered. (See Anatomy and Etiology and Pathophysiology.)

Normal portal pressure is generally considered to be between 5 and 10 mm Hg. Once the portal pressure rises to 12 mm Hg or greater, complications can arise, such as varices and ascites. Indeed, esophageal varices are responsible for the main complication of portal hypertension, massive upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (see Etiology and Pathophysiology, Prognosis, Presentation, and Workup). (See the images below.)

Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstr Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstrates multiple serpiginous filling defects primarily involving the lower one third of the esophagus with striking prominence around the gastroesophageal junction. The patient had cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse.
Barium swallow demonstrating esophageal varices in Barium swallow demonstrating esophageal varices involving the entire length of the esophagus. This appearance may be seen in advanced uphill varices or downhill varices secondary to superior vena cava obstruction at or below the level of the azygous vein.

Pathogenesis

The portal vein carries approximately 1500 mL/min of blood from the small and large bowel, the spleen, and the stomach to the liver.[2] Obstruction of portal venous flow, whatever the etiology, results in a rise in portal venous pressure. (See Etiology and Pathophysiology.)

The response to increased venous pressure is the development of collateral circulation that diverts the obstructed blood flow to the systemic veins. These portosystemic collaterals form by the opening and dilatation of preexisting vascular channels connecting the portal venous system and the superior and inferior vena cava.[3, 4, 5] (See the image below.)

Computed tomography scan showing esophageal varice Computed tomography scan showing esophageal varices. Note the extensive collateralization within the abdomen adjacent to the spleen as a result of severe portal hypertension.

Although high portal pressure is the main cause of the development of portosystemic collaterals, other factors, such as active angiogenesis, may also be involved. The most important portosystemic anastomoses are the gastroesophageal collaterals, which include esophageal varices. The gastroesophageal collaterals drain into the azygos vein.

Previous
Next

Anatomy

The portal vein drains blood from the small and large intestines, stomach, spleen, pancreas, and gallbladder. The superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein unite behind the neck of the pancreas to form the portal vein. The portal trunk divides into 2 lobar veins. The right branch drains the cystic vein, and the left branch receives the umbilical and paraumbilical veins that enlarge to form umbilical varices in portal hypertension. The coronary vein, which runs along the lesser curvature of the stomach, receives distal esophageal veins, which also enlarge in portal hypertension. (See the image below.)

Portal vein and associated anatomy. Portal vein and associated anatomy.
Previous
Next

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Increase in vascular resistance

The initial factor in the etiology of portal hypertension is the increase in vascular resistance to the portal blood flow. Poiseuille’s law, which can be applied to portal vascular resistance, R, states that R = 8hL/pr4, where h is the viscosity of blood, L is the length of the blood vessel, and r is the radius of the blood vessel. The viscosity of the blood is related to the hematocrit. The lengths of the blood vessels in the portal vasculature are relatively constant.

Thus, changes in portal vascular resistance are determined primarily by blood vessel radius. Because portal vascular resistance is indirectly proportional to the fourth power of the vessel radius, small decreases in the vessel radius cause large increases in portal vascular resistance and, therefore, in portal blood pressure (P = F8hL/pr4, where P is portal pressure and F is portal blood flow).

Liver disease that decreases the portal vascular radius produces a dramatic increase in portal vascular resistance. In cirrhosis, the increase occurs at the hepatic microcirculation (sinusoidal portal hypertension). Increased hepatic vascular resistance in cirrhosis is not only a mechanical consequence of the hepatic architectural disorder; a dynamic component also exists due to the active contraction of myofibroblasts, activated stellate cells, and vascular smooth-muscle cells of the intrahepatic veins.

Endogenous factors and pharmacologic agents that modify the dynamic component include those that increase or decrease hepatic vascular resistance. Factors that increase hepatic vascular resistance include endothelin-1 (ET-1), alpha-adrenergic stimulus, and angiotensin II. Factors that decrease hepatic vascular resistance include nitric oxide (NO),[6] prostacyclin, and vasodilating drugs (eg, organic nitrates, adrenolytics, calcium channel blockers).[4, 7]

Endothelin and nitric oxide

Studies have demonstrated the role of ET-1 and NO in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension and esophageal varices.[4, 7] ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor synthesized by sinusoidal endothelial cells that has been implicated in the increased hepatic vascular resistance of cirrhosis and in the development of liver fibrosis.

NO is a vasodilator substance that is also synthesized by sinusoidal endothelial cells. In the cirrhotic liver, the production of NO is decreased, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activity and nitrite production by sinusoidal endothelial cells are reduced. As a result, intrahepatic vasoconstriction occurs in cirrhotic liver and accounts for approximately 20-30% of the increased intrahepatic resistance.[7, 8, 9] Another major contribution to increased portal venous pressure is the concomitant splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation causing increased portal venous inflow.

Location of resistance in relation to the liver and sinusoids

Obstruction and increased resistance can occur at 3 levels in relation to the hepatic sinusoids, as follows (see the Table, below):

  • Presinusoidal venous block (eg, portal vein thrombosis, schistosomiasis, primary biliary cirrhosis) - Characterized by elevated portal venous pressure and a normal wedged hepatic venous pressure (WHVP); these abnormalities cannot be detected by surrogate measurement (WHPV, HVPG), because the measured pressure represents portal pressure in the segment distal to the lesions, which is normal; however, direct measurement of the portal venous pressure will be elevated
  • Postsinusoidal obstruction (eg, right sided heart failure, inferior vena caval obstruction) - WHVP is characteristically elevated, whereas the HVPG and FHVP can be either elevated or normal, depending on the site of obstruction (intrahepatic postsinusoidal vs posthepatic obstruction)
  • Sinusoidal obstruction (eg, cirrhosis) - Characterized by HVPG, FHVP, and WHVP, with WHVP being equal to portal venous pressure (because disrupted intersinusoidal communications diminishes compressibility and compliance of the sinusoids, allowing direct transmission of portal pressure to the WHVP)

Table 1. Interpretation of Surrogate Portal Venous Pressure Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension (Open Table in a new window)

Etiology of Portal Hypertension WHVP FHVP HVPG
Prehepatic Normal Normal Normal
Intrahepatic Presinusoidal Normal Normal Normal
Sinusoidal Increased Increased Increased
Postsinusoidal Increased Normal Increased
Posthepatic Budd-Chiari syndrome N/A Hepatic vein cannot be cannulated N/A
Other posthepatic causes Increased Increased Normal
FHVP = free hepatic venous pressure; HVPG = hepatic venous pressure gradient; N/A = not applicable; WHVP = wedged hepatic venous pressure.

With regard to the liver itself, causes of portal hypertension usually are classified as prehepatic, intrahepatic, and posthepatic.

Prehepatic resistance

Prehepatic causes of increased resistance to flow include the following:

  • Portal vein thrombosis [10]
  • Splenic vein thrombosis
  • Congenital atresia or stenosis of portal vein
  • Extrinsic compression (tumors)
  • Splanchnic arteriovenous fistula

Intrahepatic resistance

Studies of hepatic microcirculation have identified several mechanisms that may explain increased intrahepatic vascular resistance to flow. These mechanisms may be summarized as follows[6] :

  • A reduction of sinusoidal caliber due to hepatocyte enlargement
  • An alteration in the elastic properties of the sinusoidal wall due to collagen deposition in the space of Disse
  • Compression of hepatic venules by regeneration nodules
  • Central vein lesions caused by perivenous fibrosis
  • Veno-occlusive changes
  • Perisinusoidal block by portal inflammation, portal fibrosis, and piecemeal necrosis

More specifically, intrahepatic, predominantly presinusoidal causes of resistance to flow include the following:

  • Schistosomiasis (early stage)
  • Primary biliary cirrhosis (early stage)
  • Idiopathic portal hypertension (early stage) [11]
  • Nodular regenerative hyperplasia - The pathogenesis probably is obliterative venopathy; the presence of nodules that press on the portal system has also been postulated to play a role, although nodularity is present in most cases without clinical evidence of portal hypertension
  • Myeloproliferative diseases - These act via direct infiltration by malignant cells
  • Polycystic disease
  • Hepatic metastasis
  • Granulomatous diseases (sarcoidosis, tuberculosis) - Clinical liver dysfunction is rare in sarcoidosis, whereas portal hypertension is an unusual, although well-recognized, manifestation of hepatic sarcoidosis; sarcoid granulomas frequently localize in the portal areas, resulting in injury to the portal veins

Intrahepatic, predominantly sinusoidal causes of resistance include the following:

  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • Acute alcoholic hepatitis
  • Schistosomiasis (advanced stage)
  • Primary biliary cirrhosis (advanced stage)
  • Idiopathic portal hypertension (advanced stage) [11]
  • Acute and fulminant hepatitis
  • Congenital hepatic fibrosis
  • Peliosis hepatitis
  • Veno-occlusive disease
  • Budd-Chiari syndrome
  • Vitamin A toxicity
  • Sclerosing cholangitis
  • Hepatitis B virus–related and hepatitis C virus–related cirrhosis
  • Wilson disease
  • Hemochromatosis
  • Chronic active hepatitis

With regard to chronic active hepatitis, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis is observed with various toxic injuries, and one of these includes vitamin A toxicity. This probably is due to vascular injury. Excessive doses of vitamin A taken for months or years can lead to chronic hepatic disease. Intake of doses ranging from as small as 3-fold the recommended daily dose continued for years to doses as high as 20-fold the approved dose for a few months can lead to hepatic disease. The pericellular fibrotic characteristic of vitamin A toxicity may lead to portal hypertension.

Postsinusoidal obstruction syndrome and veno-occlusive disease of the liver are postsinusoidal causes of resistance.

Posthepatic resistance

Posthepatic causes of resistance to flow include the following:

  • Thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC)
  • Right-sided heart failure
  • Constrictive pericarditis
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation
  • Budd-Chiari syndrome
  • Arterial-portal venous fistula
  • Increased portal blood flow
  • Increased splenic flow

Increase in portal blood flow

The second factor that contributes to the pathogenesis of portal hypertension is an increase in blood flow in the portal veins. This increase is established through splanchnic arteriolar vasodilatation caused by an excessive release of endogenous vasodilators (eg, endothelial, neural, humoral).

The increase in portal blood flow aggravates the increase in portal pressure; the increased flow contributes to the ability of portal hypertension to exist despite the formation of an extensive network of portosystemic collaterals that may divert as much as 80% of the portal blood flow.

Manifestations of splanchnic vasodilatation include increased cardiac output, arterial hypotension, and hypervolemia. This explains the rationale for treating portal hypertension with a low-sodium diet and diuretics to attenuate the hyperkinetic state.

Formation of varices

An elevated pressure difference between systemic and portal circulation (ie, HVPG) directly contributes to the development of varices.[8, 12, 13] HVPG is a surrogate marker of portal pressure gradient and is derived from WHVP corrected (subtracted) with free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP).

The hypertensive portal vein is decompressed by diverting up to 90% of the portal flow through portasystemic collaterals back to the heart, resulting in enlargement of these vessels. These vessels are commonly located at the gastroesophageal junction, where they lie subjacent to the mucosa and present as gastric and esophageal varices. Varices form when the HVPG exceeds 10 mm Hg; they usually do not bleed unless the HVPG exceeds 12 mm Hg (normal HVPG: 1-5 mm Hg).[8, 12, 13, 14]

Gastroesophageal varices have 2 main inflows. The first is the left gastric or coronary vein, and the second is the splenic hilum, through the short gastric veins. The gastroesophageal varices are important because of their propensity to bleed. (See the images below.)

Normal venous flow through the portal and systemic Normal venous flow through the portal and systemic circulation. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.
Redirection of flow through the left gastric vein Redirection of flow through the left gastric vein secondary to portal hypertension or portal venous occlusion. Uphill varices develop in the distal one third of the esophagus. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.

Mechanisms of variceal hemorrhage

Increased portal pressure contributes to increased varix size and decreased varix wall thickness, thus leading to increased variceal wall tension. Rupture occurs when the wall tension exceeds the elastic limits of the variceal wall. Varices are most superficial at the gastroesophageal junction and have the thinnest wall in that region; thus, variceal hemorrhage invariably occurs in that area.[14]

The following are risk factors for variceal hemorrhage[8, 12, 15] :

  • Variceal size - The larger the varix, the higher the risk of rupture and bleeding; however, patients may bleed from small varices too
  • The presence of endoscopic red color signs (eg, red wale markings, cherry red spots)
  • Child B or C classification, especially the presence of ascites, increases the risk of hemorrhage
  • Active alcohol intake in patients with chronic, alcohol-related liver diseases
  • Local changes in the distal esophagus (eg, gastroesophageal reflux) – These have been postulated to increase the risk of variceal hemorrhage, but evidence to support this view is weak; studies indicate that gastroesophageal reflux does not initiate or play a role in esophageal hemorrhage [16, 17]
  • Bacterial infection - A well-documented association exists between variceal hemorrhage and bacterial infections, and this may represent a causal relationship

Note that bacterial infection could also trigger variceal bleeding through a number of mechanisms, including the following:

  • The release of endotoxin into the systemic circulation
  • Worsening of hemostasis
  • Vasoconstriction induced by the contraction of stellate cells
Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Population-based prevalence data for portal hypertension in the United States are not available, but portal hypertension is a frequent manifestation of liver cirrhosis. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), liver cirrhosis accounted for almost 30,000 deaths in the United States in 2007, making it the 12th leading cause of US deaths.[18]

The international incidence of portal hypertension is also not known, although it is probably similar to that of the US, with differences primarily in the causes. In Western countries, alcoholic and viral cirrhosis are the leading causes of portal hypertension and esophageal varices; 30% of patients with compensated cirrhosis and 60-70% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis have gastroesophageal varices at the time of diagnosis.[8, 12] The frequency of gastroesophageal varices directly correlates with the severity of the liver disease from 40% in Child class A to 85% in Child class C.[8, 12]

The de novo rate of development of esophageal varices in US patients with chronic liver disease is approximately 8% per year for the first 2 years and 30% by the sixth year. The risk of bleeding from esophageal varices is 30% in the first year after identification. Bleeding from esophageal varices accounts for approximately 10% of episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Hepatitis B is endemic in the Far East and Southeast Asia, particularly, as well as in South America, North Africa, Egypt, and other countries in the Middle East. Schistosomiasis is an important cause of portal hypertension in Egypt, Sudan, southern and sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, Caribbean, and South America. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a major cause of liver cirrhosis in the United States as hepatitis C is becoming a major cause of liver cirrhosis worldwide.

Sex- and age-related demographics

Liver disease demonstrates a sex predilection, with males making up more than 60% of patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.[19]

In general, alcoholic liver disease and viral hepatitis are the most common causes for esophageal varices in both sexes. However, veno-occlusive diseases and primary biliary cirrhosis are more common in females; and in females with esophageal varices, alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis, veno-occlusive disease, and primary biliary cirrhosis are usually responsible. In males with esophageal varices, alcoholic liver disease and viral hepatitis are usually the cause.

Portal vein thrombosis and secondary biliary cirrhosis are the most common causes of esophageal varices in children. Cirrhosis is the most common cause of esophageal varices in adults.

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Patients with severe and persistent upper gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (ie, requiring transfusions of >5 U of packed red blood cells) have higher morbidity and mortality rate.

Variceal hemorrhage is the most common complication associated with portal hypertension. Almost 90% of patients with cirrhosis develop varices, and approximately 30% of varices bleed. The estimated mortality rate for the first episode of variceal hemorrhage is 30-50%.

Patients with a known diagnosis of esophageal varices have a 30% chance of variceal bleeding within the first year after the diagnosis.[12] The mortality rate of the bleeding episode depends on the severity of the underlying liver disease.[12]

Patients who have had 1 episode of bleeding from esophageal varices have a 60-80% chance of rebleeding within 1 year after the initial episode; approximately one third of further bleeding episodes are fatal.[8, 12, 20] The risk of death is maximal during the first few days after the bleeding episode and decreases slowly over the first 6 weeks. However, despite improvements in therapy, the mortality rate at 6 weeks is remains greater than 20%; this rate is higher when surgical intervention is needed.[8]

Associated abnormalities in the renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and immune systems of patients with esophageal varices contribute to 20-65% of deaths in these individuals. Complications associated with portal hypertension and GI bleeding include the following:

  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Bronchial aspiration, aspiration pneumonia
  • Renal failure
  • Systemic infections, sepsis
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
  • Ascites
  • Hepatorenal syndrome
  • Bacteremia and/or endotoxemia
  • Vascular collapse
  • Cardiomyopathy
  • Arrhythmias
  • Hypotension
  • Portal hypertensive gastropathy - This is a common complication of cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but significant bleeding from this source is relatively uncommon

Other complications include those related to blood transfusion(s) and/or those related to the therapeutic procedures used in the management of bleeding varices.

In a retrospective study (2002-2014) of 80 patients with portopulmonary hypertension, Mayo Clinic investigators noted that intrapulmonary vascular dilatations (IPVDs) were common and associated with reduced survival.[21]  The presence of IPVDs was detected by agitated saline contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), traditionally more frequently associated with hepatopulmonary syndrome than with portopulmonary hypertension.[21]

Prognosis in patients with esophageal varices

Patients with a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) of 20 mm Hg measured 24 hours after the onset of bleeding esophageal varices have a higher 1-year mortality rate.[12] Other factors that can affect the prognosis of patients with esophageal varices include the following:

  • Rebleeding
  • Child classification - Especially the presence of ascites
  • Active alcohol intake in patients with chronic, alcohol-related liver diseases
  • Occurrence of complications

Several factors are known to influence the prognosis of esophageal bleeding. These include the following:

  • The natural course of the disease causing portal hypertension
  • The severity of the portal hypertension
  • The location and number of the bleeding varices
  • The functional status of the liver and the severity of the liver disease - Early rebleeding, within 5 days of admission; occurred in 21% of patients classified as Child-Pugh grade A, 40% of patients classified as grade B, and 63% of patients classified as grade C
  • Presence of associated systemic disorders
  • Continued alcohol abuse
  • Response to emergency treatment
Previous
Next

Patient Education

Educate patients about the benefits and disadvantages of available treatment options.

Alcohol intake should strongly be discouraged, especially in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Available resources for alcohol rehabilitation should be provided, along with any prophylaxis for alcohol withdrawal symptoms, when indicated.

Unless contraindicated, all patients with esophageal varices should take beta-blockers to reduce the risk of bleeding. Patients should also be educated about the adverse effects of beta-blockers and the possible risks of their abrupt discontinuation.

Advise patients who have ascites of the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during an episode of acute variceal bleeding.

For patient education information, see the Digestive Disorders Center and the Heartburn & GERD Center, as well as Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Cirrhosis, and Gastritis.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Jesus Carale, MD Consulting Gastroenterologist, Arkansas Valley Regional Medical Center, La Junta, Colorado

Jesus Carale, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH Professor of Medical Education, Chair of Medical Education Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia; Visiting Professor of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan; Former Senior Lecturer in Medical Education, Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne and University of Sydney, Australia

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: New York Academy of Sciences, Sigma Xi, Association for Psychological Science, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, American College of Gastroenterology, Royal Society of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Parit Mekaroonkamol, MD Resident Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein Medical Center

Parit Mekaroonkamol, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, Pennsylvania Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

BS Anand, MD Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine

BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH Professor of Medical Education and Head of Curriculum Development Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Visiting Professor of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Japan; former Professor of Medical Education, Chair of Medical Education Research and Development Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia; former Consultant to the Victorian Postgraduate Medical Foundation, Melbourne, Australia; former Senior Lecturer in Medical Education, Faculty Education Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne and University of Sydney, Australia

Samy A Azer, MD, PhD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, Association for Psychological Science, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, New York Academy of Sciences, Royal Society of Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Simmy Bank, MD Chair, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Merck Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Ikaria Pharmaceuticals Honoraria Board membership

Ann Ouyang, MBBS Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milton S Hershey Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Waqar A Qureshi, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Chief of Endoscopy, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Waqar A Qureshi, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Reference Salary Employment

Noel Williams, MD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Noel Williams, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Hou W, Sanyal AJ. Ascites: diagnosis and management. Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jul. 93(4):801-17, vii. [Medline].

  2. Khurana I. Essentials of Medical Physiology. Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India: Elsevier; 2008. 215.

  3. Lubel JS, Angus PW. Modern management of portal hypertension. Intern Med J. 2005 Jan. 35(1):45-9. [Medline].

  4. Obara K. Hemodynamic mechanism of esophageal varices. Dig Endosc. 2006 Jan. 18(1):6-9.

  5. Ravindra KV, Eng M, Marvin M. Current management of sinusoidal portal hypertension. Am Surg. 2008 Jan. 74(1):4-10. [Medline].

  6. Theodorakis NG, Wang YN, Wu JM, Maluccio MA, Sitzmann JV, Skill NJ. Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the development of portal hypertension in the carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009 Oct. 297(4):G792-9. [Medline].

  7. Gupta TK, Toruner M, Chung MK, Groszmann RJ. Endothelial dysfunction and decreased production of nitric oxide in the intrahepatic microcirculation of cirrhotic rats. Hepatology. 1998 Oct. 28(4):926-31. [Medline].

  8. [Guideline] Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey WD, and the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Sep. 102(9):2086-102. [Medline].

  9. Bhathal PS, Grossman HJ. Reduction of the increased portal vascular resistance of the isolated perfused cirrhotic rat liver by vasodilators. J Hepatol. 1985. 1(4):325-37. [Medline].

  10. Chawla Y, Duseja A, Dhiman RK. Review article: the modern management of portal vein thrombosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 1. 30(9):881-94. [Medline].

  11. Seijo S, Reverter E, Miquel R, et al. Role of hepatic vein catheterisation and transient elastography in the diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Oct. 44(10):855-60. [Medline].

  12. [Guideline] Dite P, Labrecque D, Fried M, et al, for the World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). World Gastroenterology Organisation practice guideline: esophageal varices. Munich, Germany: World Gastroenterology Organisation; 2008. Available at http://guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=13000. Accessed: August 6, 2012.

  13. Thalheimer U, Leandro G, Samonakis DN, Triantos CK, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Assessment of the agreement between wedge hepatic vein pressure and portal vein pressure in cirrhotic patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Aug. 37(8):601-8. [Medline].

  14. Sanyal AJ, Bosch J, Blei A, Arroyo V. Portal hypertension and its complications. Gastroenterology. 2008 May. 134(6):1715-28. [Medline].

  15. [Guideline] Qureshi W, Adler DG, Davila R, et al, for the Standards of Practice Committee. ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov. 62(5):651-5. [Medline].

  16. Heil T, Mattes P, Loeprecht H. Gastro-oesophageal reflux: an aetiological factor for bleeding in oesophageal varices?. Br J Surg. 1980 Jul. 67(7):467-8. [Medline].

  17. Eckardt VF, Grace ND. Gastroesophageal reflux and bleeding esophageal varices. Gastroenterology. 1979 Jan. 76(1):39-42. [Medline].

  18. Yoon Y, Yi H. Surveillance report no. 88: liver cirrhosis mortality in the United States, 1970-2007. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Available at http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/surveillance88/Cirr07.htm. Accessed: Jul 17 2012.

  19. Kim WR, Brown RS Jr, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002 Jul. 36(1):227-42. [Medline].

  20. D'Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2006 Nov. 131(5):1611-24. [Medline].

  21. Fussner LA, Iyer VN, Cartin-Ceba R, Lin G, Watt KD, Krowka MJ. Intrapulmonary vascular dilatations are common in portopulmonary hypertension and may be associated with decreased survival. Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov. 21 (11):1355-64. [Medline].

  22. Jutabha R, Jensen DM. Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the patient with chronic liver disease. Med Clin North Am. 1996 Sep. 80(5):1035-68. [Medline].

  23. Boonpongmanee S, Fleischer DE, Pezzullo JC, et al. The frequency of peptic ulcer as a cause of upper-GI bleeding is exaggerated. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jun. 59(7):788-94. [Medline].

  24. Enestvedt BK, Gralnek IM, Mattek N, Lieberman DA, Eisen G. An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar. 67(3):422-9. [Medline].

  25. Singal AK, Ahmad M, Soloway RD. Duplex Doppler ultrasound examination of the portal venous system: an emerging novel technique for the estimation of portal vein pressure. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 May. 55(5):1230-40. [Medline].

  26. Wereszczynka-Siemiatkowska U, Swidnicka-Siergiejko A, Siemiatkowski A, et al. Endothelin 1 and transforming growth factor-β1 correlate with liver function and portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. Cytokine. 2015 Dec. 76 (2):144-51. [Medline].

  27. Beppu K, Inokuchi K, Koyanagi N, et al. Prediction of variceal hemorrhage by esophageal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 Nov. 27(4):213-8. [Medline].

  28. Khan NM, Shapiro AB. The white nipple sign: please do not disturb. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011 May. 5(2):386-90. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  29. de Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep. 63(3):743-52. [Medline].

  30. Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2012 Mar. 56(3):696-703. [Medline].

  31. Kim TY, Jeong WK, Sohn JH, Kim J, Kim MY, Kim Y. Evaluation of portal hypertension by real-time shear wave elastography in cirrhotic patients. Liver Int. 2015 Nov. 35 (11):2416-24. [Medline].

  32. Pollo-Flores P, Soldan M, Santos UC, et al. Three months of simvastatin therapy vs. placebo for severe portal hypertension in cirrhosis: A randomized controlled trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Nov. 47 (11):957-63. [Medline].

  33. de Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno III Consensus Workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2000 Nov. 33(5):846-52. [Medline].

  34. Ferreira FG, Ribeiro MA, de Fatima Santos M, Assef JC, Szutan LA. Doppler ultrasound could predict varices progression and rebleeding after portal hypertension surgery: lessons from 146 EGDS and 10 years of follow-up. World J Surg. 2009 Oct. 33(10):2136-43. [Medline].

  35. Burger-Klepp U, Karatosic R, Thum M, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography during orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with esophagoastric varices. Transplantation. 2012 Jul 27. 94(2):192-6. [Medline].

  36. Bonnet S, Sauvanet A, Bruno O, et al. Long-term survival after portal vein arterialization for portal vein thrombosis in orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Jan. 34(1):23-8. [Medline].

  37. Lo GH, Lai KH, Cheng JS, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation plus nadolol and sucralfate compared with ligation alone for the prevention of variceal rebleeding: a prospective, randomized trial. Hepatology. 2000 Sep. 32(3):461-5. [Medline].

  38. Lo GH, Chen WC, Chan HH, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of banding ligation plus drug therapy versus drug therapy alone in the prevention of esophageal variceal rebleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Jun. 24(6):982-7. [Medline].

  39. Kumar A, Jha SK, Sharma P, et al. Addition of propranolol and isosorbide mononitrate to endoscopic variceal ligation does not reduce variceal rebleeding incidence. Gastroenterology. 2009 Sep. 137(3):892-901, 901.e1. [Medline].

  40. de Franchis R. Evolving consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno IV consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2005 Jul. 43(1):167-76. [Medline].

  41. Castaneda B, Morales J, Lionetti R, et al. Effects of blood volume restitution following a portal hypertensive-related bleeding in anesthetized cirrhotic rats. Hepatology. 2001 Apr. 33(4):821-5. [Medline].

  42. Sass DA, Chopra KB. Portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage. Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jul. 93(4):837-53, vii-viii. [Medline].

  43. Rimola A, Garcia-Tsao G, Navasa M. Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. International Ascites Club. J Hepatol. 2000 Jan. 32(1):142-53. [Medline].

  44. de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2010 Oct. 53(4):762-8. [Medline].

  45. Chandramouli J, Jensen L. Vasopressin injection. [Updated October 16, 2012.] Alternative agents & management. Table 1. Alternatives to vasopressin in selected situations. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Available at https://www.ashp.org/DrugShortages/Current/bulletin.aspx?id=795. Accessed: November 20, 2012.

  46. Imperiale TF, Teran JC, McCullough AJ. A meta-analysis of somatostatin versus vasopressin in the management of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology. 1995 Oct. 109(4):1289-94. [Medline].

  47. Baik SK, Jeong PH, Ji SW. Acute hemodynamic effects of octreotide and terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized comparison. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar. 100(3):631-5. [Medline].

  48. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Pietrosi G, Tarantino I. Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for bleeding oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17. CD002233. [Medline].

  49. Bajaj JS, Sanyal AJ. Treatment of active variceal hemorrhage. UpToDate. Available at http://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-active-variceal-hemorrhage. Accessed: August 2, 2012.

  50. Garcia-Pagan JC, Bosch J. Endoscopic band ligation in the treatment of portal hypertension. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Nov. 2(11):526-35. [Medline].

  51. Avgerinos A, Armonis A, Stefanidis G, et al. Sustained rise of portal pressure after sclerotherapy, but not band ligation, in acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2004 Jun. 39(6):1623-30. [Medline].

  52. Cheng LF, Wang ZQ, Li CZ, Lin W, Yeo AE, Jin B. Low incidence of complications from endoscopic gastric variceal obturation with butyl cyanoacrylate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep. 8(9):760-6. [Medline].

  53. Garcia-Pagan JC, Caca K, Bureau C, Laleman W, Appenrodt B, Luca A. Early use of TIPS in patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 24. 362(25):2370-9. [Medline].

  54. Danziger J, Thummalakunta L, Nelson R, Faintuch S. The risk of acute kidney injury with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Nephrol. 2015 Dec. 28 (6):725-8. [Medline].

  55. Samonakis DN, Triantos CK, Thalheimer U. Management of portal hypertension. Postgrad Med J. 2004 Nov. 80(949):634-41. [Medline].

  56. D'Amico G, Pagliaro L, Bosch J. Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: an evidence-based approach. Semin Liver Dis. 1999. 19(4):475-505. [Medline].

  57. Bosch J, Abraldes JG, Groszmann R. Current management of portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2003. 38 Suppl 1:S54-68. [Medline].

  58. Chang YW. Indication of treatment for esophageal varices: who and when?. Dig Endosc. 2006 Jan. 18(1):10-5.

  59. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2007 Sep. 46(3):922-38. [Medline].

  60. Merkel C, Marin R, Enzo E, et al. Randomised trial of nadolol alone or with isosorbide mononitrate for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Gruppo-Triveneto per L'ipertensione portale (GTIP). Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28. 348(9043):1677-81. [Medline].

  61. Garcia-Tsao G. Portal hypertension. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2000 May. 16(3):282-9. [Medline].

  62. Gluud LL, Klingenberg S, Nikolova D, Gluud C. Banding ligation versus beta-blockers as primary prophylaxis in esophageal varices: systematic review of randomized trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Dec. 102(12):2842-8; quiz 2841, 2849. [Medline].

  63. Lay CS, Tsai YT, Lee FY, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation versus propranolol in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Feb. 21(2):413-9. [Medline].

  64. Abraczinskas DR, Ookubo R, Grace ND. Propranolol for the prevention of first esophageal variceal hemorrhage: a lifetime commitment?. Hepatology. 2001 Dec. 34(6):1096-102. [Medline].

  65. Augustin S, Millan L, Gonzalez A, et al. Detection of early portal hypertension with routine data and liver stiffness in patients with asymptomatic liver disease: a prospective study. J Hepatol. 2014 Mar. 60(3):561-9. [Medline].

  66. Bhasin DK, Siyad I. Variceal bleeding and portal hypertension: new lights on old horizon. Endoscopy. 2004 Feb. 36(2):120-9. [Medline].

  67. Boggs W. Newborn health advocates propose acceleration of kangaroo mother care. Reuters Health Information. December 4, 2013. [Full Text].

  68. Boggs W. Simple strategy detects early portal hypertension in asymptomatic patients. Reuters Health Information. November 28, 2013. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/815191. Accessed: December 10, 2013.

  69. Chalasani N, Imperiale TF, Ismail A. Predictors of large esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Nov. 94(11):3285-91. [Medline].

  70. Conn HO. Portal hypertension, varices, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Clin Liver Dis. 2000 Feb. 4(1):133-50, vii. [Medline].

  71. de Franchis R, Primignani M. Why do varices bleed?. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1992 Mar. 21(1):85-101. [Medline].

  72. Feldman M, Scharschmidt B, Zorab R, eds. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1998.

  73. Garcia-Pagan JC, Bosch J. Medical treatment of portal hypertension. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec. 14(6):895-909. [Medline].

  74. Garcia-Tsao G. Current management of the complications of cirrhosis and portal hypertension: variceal hemorrhage, ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Gastroenterology. 2001 Feb. 120(3):726-48. [Medline].

  75. Goh SH, Tan WP, Lee SW. Clinical predictors of bleeding esophageal varices in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Jul. 23(4):531-5. [Medline].

  76. Henderson JM. Surgical treatment of portal hypertension. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec. 14(6):911-25. [Medline].

  77. Krige JE, Beckingham IJ. ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas, and biliary system. Portal hypertension-1: varices. BMJ. 2001 Feb 10. 322(7282):348-51. [Medline].

  78. Krige JE, Shaw JM, Bornman PC. The evolving role of endoscopic treatment for bleeding esophageal varices. World J Surg. 2005. 29:966-73. [Medline].

  79. Lowe RC, Grace ND. Pharmacologic therapy for portal hypertension. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001 Feb. 3(1):24-9. [Medline].

  80. Merkel C, Zoli M, Siringo S. Prognostic indicators of risk for first variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a multicenter study in 711 patients to validate and improve the North Italian Endoscopic Club (NIEC) index. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct. 95(10):2915-20. [Medline].

  81. Pruvot FR, Quandalle P, Paris JC. [What's left for surgical treatment of portal hypertension in cirrhosis patients?]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003 Nov. 27(11):1013-20. [Medline].

  82. Russo MW, Brown RS Jr. Endoscopic treatment of patients with portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2001 Jan. 11(1):1-14. [Medline].

  83. Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology. 1992 Dec. 16(6):1343-9. [Medline].

  84. Schiff ER, Sorrell MF, Maddrey WC, eds. Schiff's Diseases of the Liver. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

  85. Sherlock S, Dooley J, eds. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary System. 10th ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 1997.

  86. Soares-Weiser K, Brezis M, Tur-Kaspa R. Antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial infections in cirrhotic inpatients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003 Feb. 38(2):193-200. [Medline].

  87. Sterling RK, Sanyal AJ. Are TIPS tops in the treatment of portal hypertension? A review on the use and misuse of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov. 14 Suppl D:122D-128D. [Medline].

  88. Wongcharatrawee S, Groszmann RJ. Diagnosing portal hypertension. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2000 Dec. 14(6):881-94. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Large esophageal varices with red wale signs seen on endoscopy. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Uphill esophageal varices. Barium swallow demonstrates multiple serpiginous filling defects primarily involving the lower one third of the esophagus with striking prominence around the gastroesophageal junction. The patient had cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse.
Barium swallow demonstrating esophageal varices involving the entire length of the esophagus. This appearance may be seen in advanced uphill varices or downhill varices secondary to superior vena cava obstruction at or below the level of the azygous vein.
Computed tomography scan showing esophageal varices. Note the extensive collateralization within the abdomen adjacent to the spleen as a result of severe portal hypertension.
Normal venous flow through the portal and systemic circulation. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.
Redirection of flow through the left gastric vein secondary to portal hypertension or portal venous occlusion. Uphill varices develop in the distal one third of the esophagus. IMC = inferior mesenteric vein; IVC = inferior vena cava; SVC = superior vena cava.
Portal vein and associated anatomy.
Power Doppler sonogram through the spleen shows varices at the hilum of an enlarged spleen. The final diagnosis was hepatitis C cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma of the left hepatic lobe (which had ruptured into the peritoneum), and portoarterial fistula (which had developed inside the ruptured tumor, giving rise to severe portal hypertension).
Duplex spectral Doppler sonogram of the portal vein (same patient as in the previous image) shows a bidirectional flow within the vein. The final diagnosis was hepatitis C cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma of the left hepatic lobe (which had ruptured into the peritoneum), and portoarterial fistula (which had developed inside the ruptured tumor, giving rise to severe portal hypertension).
Digital subtraction selective common hepatic artery angiogram shows immediate filling of the portal venous radicles in the left lobe of the liver (straight arrow) and early filling of portal vein (curved arrow), suggestive of hepatic arterial-portal vein fistula. The final diagnosis was hepatitis C cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma of the left hepatic lobe (which had ruptured into the peritoneum), and portoarterial fistula (which had developed inside the ruptured tumor, giving rise to severe portal hypertension).
Delayed venous phase of a selective common hepatic angiogram (same patient as in the previous image) shows the portal vein (P), with filling of the coronary vein caused by retrograde flow feeding gastric and lower esophageal varices (arrows). Retrograde flow in enlarged umbilical veins also is seen. The final diagnosis was hepatitis C cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma of the left hepatic lobe (which had ruptured into the peritoneum), and portoarterial fistula (which had developed inside the ruptured tumor, giving rise to severe portal hypertension).
Digital subtraction venous phase of a superior mesenteric artery angiogram (same patient as in the previous 2 images) shows retrograde flow into the coronary vein (curved arrow) and the inferior mesenteric vein (straight arrow). Note the flow defect of the distal portal vein caused by retrograde flow (open arrowhead). The final diagnosis was hepatitis C cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma of the left hepatic lobe (which had ruptured into the peritoneum), and portoarterial fistula (which had developed inside the ruptured tumor, giving rise to severe portal hypertension).
This video, captured via esophagoscopy, shows band ligation of esophageal varices. Video courtesy of Dan C Cohen, MD, and Dawn Sears, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Scott & White Healthcare.
Table 1. Interpretation of Surrogate Portal Venous Pressure Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Portal Hypertension
Etiology of Portal Hypertension WHVP FHVP HVPG
Prehepatic Normal Normal Normal
Intrahepatic Presinusoidal Normal Normal Normal
Sinusoidal Increased Increased Increased
Postsinusoidal Increased Normal Increased
Posthepatic Budd-Chiari syndrome N/A Hepatic vein cannot be cannulated N/A
Other posthepatic causes Increased Increased Normal
FHVP = free hepatic venous pressure; HVPG = hepatic venous pressure gradient; N/A = not applicable; WHVP = wedged hepatic venous pressure.
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.