eMedicine Specialties > Gastroenterology > Systemic Disease

WDHA Syndrome: Treatment & Medication

Author: Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Randall E Brand, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Richard K Gilroy, MBBS, FRACP, Assistant Professor, Medical Director of Liver Transplantation and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center; Daniel Schafer, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jun 4, 2008

Treatment

Medical Care

Management of WDHA syndrome is initially directed at treating symptoms related to hormone excess and, subsequently, at the tumor itself.

  • Resuscitation: Rehydration and correction of electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities are the most urgent steps in patient care. These can be life-saving measures because the most common cause of death in these patients is acute renal failure associated with hypokalemia.
  • Octreotide: This is a long-acting synthetic analog of somatostatin, which inhibits the release of VIP. It controls diarrhea in as many as 87% of patients and may reduce the tumor size in a minority of patients. Slow-release lanreotide and Sandostatin LAR are 2 longer-acting preparations that have been developed, but lanreotide is not available in the United States.
  • Antidiarrheals: Antidiarrheal medications, such as loperamide (Imodium), may be used in addition to octreotide in patients with breakthrough diarrhea.
  • Chemotherapy  
    • Several chemotherapeutic agents have been used to treat patients with metastatic disease. Streptozotocin and doxorubicin have emerged as the agents of choice based primarily on a 1992 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study in which the combined use of these agents was associated with a 69% response rate, which was significantly higher than the 45% rate for the streptozotocin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination or 30% with chlorozotocin alone.
    • A review of 322 patients with metastatic disease treated with interferon alfa suggested that interferon has minimal tumoricidal activity, although it may stabilize tumor growth in 20-30% of patients.
    • A case report from France demonstrated major clinical improvement and regression in tumor size in a patient with jejunal VIPoma metastatic to the liver and peritoneum treated with a combination of interferon alfa and 5-FU.
    • Because of the scarcity of this condition and the incomplete understanding of its natural history, interpreting the effectiveness of these therapeutic interventions is difficult.
  • Interventional radiology
    • Because most metastatic tumors in the liver are highly vascular and receive their blood supply by the hepatic artery, hepatic artery occlusion, with or without chemotherapy, may be used for palliative treatment in patients with a patent portal vein.
    • In one large study involving 111 patients with metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumors or carcinoid tumors, hepatic artery occlusion was associated with an objective beneficial response in 60% of patients, which improved to 80% of patients with the use of chemotherapy (ie, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, streptozotocin, 5-FU). In this study, chemoembolization was also associated with longer remission time (ie, 4 mo vs 18 mo).
    • Another study reported that chemoembolization with doxorubicin in iodized acid combined with gelatin or sponge particles resulted in improved symptoms in 68-100% of patients and a decrease in tumor size and/or hormone levels in 57-100% of patients.
    • A report by Case et al reported dramatic improvement in diarrhea following hepatic artery embolization in a patient with VIPoma and liver metastases that had not responded to surgical debulking, antidiarrheals, octreotide, and targeted radioisotope injections.6

Surgical Care

Surgical resection provides the only hope for cure because 50-60% of VIPomas are malignant. Therefore, all patients should be considered for exploratory laparotomy, with the exception of those with unresectable metastatic disease or with coexisting medical illnesses that preclude surgery.

  • Exploration  
    • During exploration, the liver should be examined carefully for metastatic disease and an attempt should be made to resect isolated hepatic metastasis.
    • A careful examination of the entire pancreas requires an extended Kocher maneuver, with incision of the retroperitoneum on the superior and inferior aspects of the pancreatic body. Mobilization of the spleen may be required in order to examine the pancreatic tail, and the small bowel should be explored for extrapancreatic tumors.
    • Although VIPomas are usually intrapancreatic, nearly 10% tumors may have an ectopic location, occurring frequently along the ganglia of the autonomic nervous system. An intraoperative ultrasound is recommended for identifying tumors that were not detected preoperatively and for establishing the presence of local invasion.
  • Pancreatectomy  
    • Isolated tumors in the pancreatic body or tail should be removed by distal pancreatectomy, with or without splenectomy. Laparoscopic resection has been performed successfully in 2 patients, but experience remains limited.
    • More proximal tumors in the pancreatic head or body may be treated by enucleation rather than a Whipple procedure because these more radical techniques have not always been associated with better outcomes.
    • However, a review of 125 patients with neuroendocrine tumors by the Johns Hopkins Group revealed that the most common operation performed was pancreaticoduodenectomy (in 40% of patients). The most favorable outcome in this retrospective series was observed in patients with benign functional tumors and in those with completely resected malignant tumors.
  • Blind distal pancreatectomy is a controversial procedure that is occasionally performed in symptomatic patients in whom no tumor is found because of the 20% rate of islet cell hyperplasia in symptomatic patients. Because other hormones may cause the diarrheogenic syndrome, one reasonable alternative when faced with this clinical conundrum is to close the abdomen and to perform further localizing studies.
  • Cytoreductive/debulking surgery  
    • Cytoreductive/debulking surgery may prolong life expectancy in certain patients. However, the natural history of metastatic WDHA syndrome is not well understood because of its rarity, and, as a result, no studies have evaluated cytoreductive surgery in a controlled prospective manner to determine if survival is improved.
    • As expected, patients with resectable disease have a 5-year survival rate as high as 79%, while patients with incompletely resected or unresectable disease have a 5-year survival rate of only 28%. Note that these patients represent only a very small proportion (5-9%) of patients with metastatic disease.
    • Although only a minority of patients with metastatic WDHA syndrome have resectable disease, whether patients whose illness is well controlled with medical therapy experience any long-term benefit from debulking surgery is unclear.
  • No surgical discussion is complete without reference to the role of liver transplantation in metastatic WDHA syndrome. Although this was first described in 1990, caution should be exercised when evaluating patients with extrahepatic pancreatic endocrine tumors, particularly noncarcinoid tumors.

Consultations

A multispecialty team comprised of gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiologists, and oncologists should evaluate patients with WDHA syndrome. Because of the rarity of VIPomas, most treatment recommendations are based on the experience of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Octreotide is recommended for symptom control and may have minor antineoplastic effects. Most experts agree that chemotherapy and interferon are indicated for patients with extensive metastatic disease; however, no agreement exists as to when such treatment should be started. New treatment modalities undoubtedly will be devised for chemotherapy, hormonal modulation, and receptor modulation; however, surgical resection currently remains the cornerstone of successful treatment.

  • Oncologist
  • Interventional radiologist

Diet

No dietary modifications are required.

Activity

Activity is unrestricted.

Medication

Medications used to treat WDHA syndrome are divided into 2 categories, antisecretory agents (eg, somatostatin and its synthetic derivatives) and chemotherapeutic agents. Conventional antidiarrheals are useful adjuncts to somatostatin analogs.

Antisecretory agents

Used to treat the profuse secretory diarrhea of WDHA syndrome after patients have been resuscitated adequately. Although conventional antidiarrheals may play an adjunctive role, somatostatin derivatives are the most effective and cost-saving drugs for treating the diarrhea of WDHA syndrome.

Because VIPomas possess somatostatin receptors, somatostatin and its synthetic derivatives are used not only for tumor imaging but also to inhibit hormonal secretion of functional tumors. Radioactive-labeled somatostatin derivatives currently are being investigated in the treatment of these tumors.


Octreotide (Sandostatin, Sandostatin LAR)

A synthetic analog of somatostatin with a half-life of approximately 100 min.
A potent physiological inhibitor of numerous GI functions, including (1) release of GI peptides (eg, CCK, gastrin, secretin), (2) gastric acid secretion, (3) intestinal blood flow, (4) gall bladder and intestinal motility, (5) pancreatic enzyme secretion, and (6) small intestinal mucosal secretion. These inhibitory effects, either alone or in combination, contribute to the antidiarrheal effect. These agents improve diarrhea in as many as 86% of patients with WDHA syndrome and have been reported to decrease tumor size in up to 16% patients.
Octreotide may stabilize tumor growth in some patients but has only minimal tumoricidal activity. Some patients with troublesome diarrhea experience reduced responsiveness to octreotide with time, and, although the VIP levels decline, they do not return to baseline values. Two possible reasons for such tachyphylaxis are accelerated octreotide degradation or down-regulation of somatostatin receptors. Regardless of the mechanism, rebound diarrhea can be difficult to treat.
Sandostatin LAR is a long-acting somatostatin analog that is currently not available in the United States.

Adult

Sandostatin: 50-150 mcg SC q4-8h; doses as high as 500-1000 mcg/d have been used
Sandostatin LAR: 30 mg IM q3-4wk

Pediatric

2-20 mcg/kg SC qd; experience is limited because of the rarity of this condition in children

May reduce effects of cyclosporine; patients on insulin, oral hypoglycemics, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers may need dose adjustment

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Adverse effects are common but rarely severe enough to discontinue treatment; discomfort at injection site is common; postprandial hyperglycemia is reported occasionally; the most common adverse effects are GI and include nausea, abdominal cramps, and alterations in bowel habit that usually improve with time; long-term use results in development of gallstones and/or sludge in as many as 52% patients; however, the percentage of patients developing symptomatic gallstone disease is low


Lanreotide (Somatuline LA)

Somatostatin analog with a considerably longer half-life than octreotide.
Currently not available in the United States.

Adult

30 mg IM q10-14d

Pediatric

Not established

May increase absorption of bromocriptine

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Transient abdominal pain, pain at injection site, and hypoglycemia were reported in 3 of 16 patients in a European study

Antineoplastic agents

Chemotherapeutic agents are used to treat metastatic WDHA syndrome when surgical resection is not possible. The combination of streptozotocin and doxorubicin is superior to streptozotocin and 5-FU in the treatment of advanced islet cell carcinoma. Chlorozotocin alone is similar in efficacy to streptozotocin plus 5-FU but has fewer adverse effects than streptozotocin-containing regimens.


Streptozotocin (Zanosar)

Naturally occurring nitrosourea originally discovered as antibiotic obtained from Streptomyces achromogenes. Capable of inhibiting DNA synthesis during all stages of mammalian cycle through liberation of alkylating and carbamoylating moieties. Streptozotocin has a methylnitrosourea (MNU) moiety attached to 2 carbon of glucose and has special affinity for islet of Langerhans cells. Has half-life of approximately 15 min, and only 10-20% of dose recovered in urine.

Adult

500 mg/m2/d IV for 5 d; repeat q6wk for combination regimens

Pediatric

Not established

Aminoglycosides, loop diuretics, and doxorubicin may increase nephrotoxicity; phenytoin may decrease effects

Documented hypersensitivity; jaundice; renal failure; leucopenia; thrombocytopenia

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Severe nausea and vomiting are common; liver dysfunction can occur; renal toxicity is dose-related and cumulative; requires close monitoring of renal, hepatic, and hematologic functions; hyperglycemia is a frequent adverse effect because the drug destroys pancreatic islet cells


Chlorozotocin (DCNU, Dome, NSC 178248)

Not available in the United States. Antineoplastic nitrosourea in which the 2 carbon of glucose is substituted by the chloronitrosourea group (CNU).

Adult

150 mg/m2 q7wk

Pediatric

Not established

Documented hypersensitivity; jaundice; renal failure; leucopenia; thrombocytopenia

Pregnancy

X - Contraindicated; benefit does not outweigh risk

Precautions

Myelosuppression, nausea, and vomiting of short duration may occur


Doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Rubex)

Anthracycline antibiotic derived from fungus Streptomyces peucetius var caesius. Intercalates with DNA and disrupts many functions, including DNA and RNA synthesis. Maximum toxicity occurs during S phase of cell cycle.
Doxorubicin has multiphasic disappearance curve, with half-lives ranging up to 30 h. Does not cross blood-brain barrier but taken up rapidly by heart, lungs, liver, kidney, and spleen.

Adult

5 mg/m2 IV; repeat after 21 d of each 6-wk treatment cycle when administered with streptozotocin

Pediatric

Not established

May decrease phenytoin and digoxin plasma levels; phenobarbital may decrease its plasma levels; cyclosporine may induce coma or seizures; mercaptopurine increases toxicity; cyclophosphamide increases cardiac toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; severe heart failure; cardiomyopathy; impaired cardiac function; preexisting myelosuppression

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression is major dose-limiting complication, with leucopenia reaching its lowest level in the second week of therapy; stomatitis, GI disturbances, and alopecia are frequent complications; cardiotoxicity is a unique characteristic of anthracycline antibiotics manifested by CHF unresponsive to digoxin; extravasation may result in severe local tissue necrosis; reduce dose in patients with impaired hepatic function


Fluorouracil (Adrucil)

Pyrimidine analog of uracil, which inhibits RNA function and thymidylate synthesis. Requires enzymatic conversion to nucleotide to exert cytotoxic activity. Interruption of thymidylate synthesis results in inhibition of DNA synthesis while RNA and protein production continues. Results in an imbalance in growth that is not compatible with cell survival.
Administered parenterally and metabolized primarily in liver. Inactivated by reduction of pyrimidine ring by dihydrouracil dehydrogenase. Because enzyme widely distributed in body, dose modification not required in presence of liver disease. Readily enters CSF, with values that slowly subside over 9 h. Urinary excretion of a single IV dose is only 11% in 24 h.

Adult

400 mg/m2 IV qd for 5 d concurrently with streptozotocin

Pediatric

Not established

Increased risk of bleeding with anticoagulants, NSAIDs, platelet inhibitors, and thrombolytic agents; enhanced bone marrow toxicity with other immunosuppressive agents

Documented hypersensitivity; bone marrow suppression; serious infection

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Nausea, oral and GI ulcers, depression of immune system, and failure of hemopoiesis may occur; adjust dosage in renal impairment.

Interferons

Interferons are glycoproteins with a variety of biological actions. They are important cytokines that have immunomodulating, antiviral, and antiproliferative properties. Interferons alfa and beta are produced by most cells in response to viral infections, while interferon gamma is only produced by T lymphocytes.


Interferon alfa (Roferon-A, Intron A)

Highly purified protein, containing 165 amino acid residues. Interferons must be administered SC or IM. Rapidly inactivated in body fluids and various tissues, with initial half-life of 40 min and a terminal half-life of 5 h. Negligible amounts excreted renally. Interferon has been used as monotherapy and combined with octreotide.

Adult

5 million U SC 3 times/wk

Pediatric

Not established

Theophylline may increase toxicity; cimetidine may increase antitumor effects; zidovudine and vinblastine may increase toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; myelosuppression; severe depression

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Early adverse effects include a flulike illness with fever, chills, nausea, and headache occurring about 6 h after injection; fatigue, myalgia, and malaise occur a few weeks later; bone marrow suppression and alopecia are observed in 1-5% of patients, although predicting which adverse effects will occur is not possible; it may precipitate or worsen underlying autoimmune diseases, the most common of which is thyroiditis

Antidiarrheals

These agents are often used with somatostatin analogs. Although a wide variety of these medications has been tried, the most commonly used antidiarrheal is loperamide (Imodium).


Loperamide (Imodium)

Synthetic piperidine derivative that slows intestinal transit by direct effect on nerve endings and intestinal wall ganglia. Interferes with cholinergic and noncholinergic mechanisms involved in peristalsis, resulting in reduced activity of the intestinal wall muscles. Like diphenoxylate and morphine, it may enhance contractions of intestinal circular muscles, thus increasing segmentation and retarding intestinal forward motion. It is more specific, longer-acting, and 3 times more potent than diphenoxylate on a weight basis. Neither tolerance to the antidiarrheal effect of loperamide nor physical dependence reported.
Apparent elimination half-life in healthy adults is 9-14 h. Less than 2% of the drug is excreted in urine, and 30% is excreted as an intact molecule in feces. Enterohepatic circulation described in animals. Whether loperamide crosses placenta or distributed in milk is unknown.

Adult

4 mg PO initially, then 2 mg after each loose stool; not to exceed 16 mg/d

Pediatric

Not established; 0.08-0.24 mg/kg PO divided bid/tid is suggested

Phenothiazines, tricyclic antidepressants, and CNS depressants may increase its toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; diarrhea resulting from infections; pseudomembranous colitis

Pregnancy

B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals

Precautions

Discontinue use if no clinical improvement is observed in 48 h; because loperamide is primarily metabolized in liver, CNS toxicity should be monitored in patients with hepatic insufficiency; should not be used if high fever or blood in stool is noted; perform resuscitation of dehydrated patients before administering antidiarrheals; caution in children <2 y; no well-controlled studies of loperamide in pregnant women exist, it should only be used in pregnancy when clearly needed; use caution in breastfeeding women because whether the drug is distributed in milk is not clear

More on WDHA Syndrome

Overview: WDHA Syndrome
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: WDHA Syndrome
Treatment & Medication: WDHA Syndrome
Follow-up: WDHA Syndrome
References

References

  1. Priest WM, Alexander MK. Isletcell tumour of the pancreas with peptic ulceration, diarrhoea, and hypokalaemia. Lancet. Dec 7 1957;273(7006):1145-7. [Medline].

  2. Verner JV, Morrison AB. Islet cell tumor and a syndrome of refractory watery diarrhea and hypokalemia. Am J Med. Sep 1958;25(3):374-80. [Medline].

  3. Matsumoto KK, Peter JB, Raymond G. Watery diarrhea and hypokalemia associated with pancreatic islet cell adenoma. Gastroenterology. 1966;50:231-42.

  4. Tannapfel A, Vomschloss S, Karhoff D, Markwarth A, Hengge UR, Wittekind C, et al. BRAF gene mutations are rare events in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. Feb 2005;123(2):256-60. [Medline].

  5. Virgolini I, Kurtaran A, Leimer M, Kaserer K, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Angelberger P, et al. Location of a VIPoma by iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. Sep 1998;39(9):1575-9. [Medline].

  6. Case CC, Wirfel K, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-secreting tumor (VIPoma) with liver metastases: dramatic and durable symptomatic benefit from hepatic artery embolization, a case report. Med Oncol. 2002;19(3):181-7. [Medline].

  7. Soga J, Yakuwa Y. Vipoma/diarrheogenic syndrome: a statistical evaluation of 241 reported cases. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. Dec 1998;17(4):389-400. [Medline].

  8. Akerström G, Hellman P. Surgery on neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. Mar 2007;21(1):87-109. [Medline].

  9. Alexakis N, Neoptolemos JP. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(1):183-205. [Medline].

  10. Ayub A, Zafar M, Abdulkareem A, Ali MA, Lingawi T, Harbi A. Primary hepatic vipoma. Am J Gastroenterol. Jun 1993;88(6):958-61. [Medline].

  11. Bartsch D, Hahn SA, Danichevski KD, Ramaswamy A, Bastian D, Galehdari H, et al. Mutations of the DPC4/Smad4 gene in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Oncogene. Apr 8 1999;18(14):2367-71. [Medline].

  12. Bartsch DK, Fendrich V, Langer P, Celik I, Kann PH, Rothmund M. Outcome of duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Ann Surg. Dec 2005;242(6):757-64, discussion 764-6. [Medline].

  13. Berkovic MC, Altabas V, Herman D, Hrabar D, Goldoni V, Vizner B, et al. A single-centre experience with octreotide in the treatment of different hypersecretory syndromes in patients with functional gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Coll Antropol. Jun 2007;31(2):531-4. [Medline].

  14. Bettini R, Boninsegna L, Mantovani W, Capelli P, Bassi C, Pederzoli P, et al. Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours. Ann Oncol. May 2008;19(5):903-8. [Medline].

  15. Bramley PN, Lodge JP, Losowsky MS, Giles GR. Treatment of metastatic Vipoma by liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. Oct 1990;4(5 part 1):276-8; discussion 279. [Medline].

  16. Brunt LM, Mazoujian G, O'Dorisio TM, Wells SA Jr. Stimulation of vasoactive intestinal peptide and neurotensin secretion by pentagastrin in a patient with VIPoma syndrome. Surgery. Mar 1994;115(3):362-9. [Medline].

  17. Buchanan KD, Johnston CF, O'Hare MM, Ardill JE, Shaw C, Collins JS, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors. A European view. Am J Med. Dec 22 1986;81(6B):14-22. [Medline].

  18. Crowley PF, Slavin JL, Rode J. Massive amyloid deposition in pancreatic vipoma: a case report. Pathology. Nov 1996;28(4):377-9. [Medline].

  19. Doherty GM. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Surg Oncol. Mar 1 2005;89(3):143-50. [Medline].

  20. Doherty GM. Rare endocrine tumours of the GI tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. Oct 2005;19(5):807-17. [Medline].

  21. Eriksson B, Oberg K. Interferon therapy of malignant endocrine pancreatic tumors. In: Mignon M, Jensen RT, eds. Endocrine Tumors of the Pancreas: Recent Advances in Research and Management. Series: Frontiers in Gastrointestinal Research. Vol 23. Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger; 1995:451-60.

  22. Fendrich V, Habbe N, Celik I, Langer P, Zielke A, Bartsch DK, et al. [Operative management and long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas--experience with 144 patients]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. Feb 2 2007;132(5):195-200. [Medline].

  23. Frank M, Klose KJ, Wied M, Ishaque N, Schade-Brittinger C, Arnold R. Combination therapy with octreotide and alpha-interferon: effect on tumor growth in metastatic endocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors. Am J Gastroenterol. May 1999;94(5):1381-7. [Medline].

  24. Ghaferi AA, Chojnacki KA, Long WD, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ. Pancreatic VIPomas: subject review and one institutional experience. J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 2008;12(2):382-93. [Medline].

  25. Gibril F, Reynolds JC, Chen CC, Yu F, Goebel SU, Serrano J, et al. Specificity of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy: a prospective study and effects of false-positive localizations on management in patients with gastrinomas. J Nucl Med. Apr 1999;40(4):539-53. [Medline].

  26. Goh BK, Ooi LL, Tan YM, Cheow PC, Chung YF, Chow PK. Clinico-pathological features of cystic pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and a comparison with their solid counterparts. Eur J Surg Oncol. Jun 2006;32(5):553-6. [Medline].

  27. Gumbs AA, Grès P, Madureira F, Gayet B. Laparoscopic vs open resection of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: single institution's experience over 14 years. Langenbecks Arch Surg. May 2008;393(3):391-5. [Medline].

  28. Görtz B, Roth J, Krahenmann A, de Krijger RR, Muletta-Feurer S, Rütimann K, et al. Mutations and allelic deletions of the MEN1 gene are associated with a subset of sporadic endocrine pancreatic and neuroendocrine tumors and not restricted to foregut neoplasms. Am J Pathol. Feb 1999;154(2):429-36. [Medline].

  29. Harris AG, O'Dorisio TM, Woltering EA, Anthony LB, Burton FR, Geller RB, et al. Consensus statement: octreotide dose titration in secretory diarrhea. Diarrhea Management Consensus Development Panel. Dig Dis Sci. Jul 1995;40(7):1464-73. [Medline].

  30. Ichimura T, Kondo S, Okushiba S, Morikawa T, Katoh H. A calcitonin and vasoactive intestinal peptide-producing pancreatic endocrine tumor associated with the WDHA syndrome. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2003;33(2-3):99-102. [Medline].

  31. Ikuta S, Yasui C, Kawanaka M, Aihara T, Yoshie H, Yanagi H, et al. Watery diarrhea, hypokalemia and achlorhydria syndrome due to an adrenal pheochromocytoma. World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14 2007;13(34):4649-52. [Medline].

  32. Jackson C, Buchman AL. Calcitonin-secreting VIPoma. Dig Dis Sci. Dec 2005;50(12):2203-6. [Medline].

  33. Kazanjian KK, Reber HA, Hines OJ. Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of 70 cases. Arch Surg. Aug 2006;141(8):765-9; discussion 769-70. [Medline].

  34. Keller J, Mueller-Wolf JC, Ahmadi-Simab K, Fibbe C, Rosien U, Layer P. Do elevated plasma vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) levels cause small intestinal motor disturbances in humans?. Dig Dis Sci. Feb 2005;50(2):276-82. [Medline].

  35. Krejs GJ. Comparison of the effect of VIP and PHI on water and ion movement in the canine jejunum in vivo. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1984;8:868.

  36. Levy-Bohbot N, Merle C, Goudet P, Delemer B, Calender A, Jolly D, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and prognosis of MEN 1-associated glucagonomas, VIPomas, and somatostatinomas: study from the GTE (Groupe des Tumeurs Endocrines) registry. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. Nov 2004;28(11):1075-81. [Medline].

  37. Lubinski SM, Hendrix T. Images in clinical medicine. VIPoma. N Engl J Med. Aug 19 2004;351(8):808. [Medline].

  38. Lévy-Bohbot N, Merle C, Goudet P, Delemer B, Calender A, Jolly D, et al. Prevalence, characteristics and prognosis of MEN 1-associated glucagonomas, VIPomas, and somatostatinomas: study from the GTE (Groupe des Tumeurs Endocrines) registry. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. Nov 2004;28(11):1075-81. [Medline].

  39. Mansour JC, Chen H. Pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Surg Res. Jul 2004;120(1):139-61. [Medline].

  40. Mao C, Carter P, Schaefer P, Zhu L, Dominguez JM, Hanson DJ, et al. Malignant islet cell tumor associated with hypercalcemia. Surgery. Jan 1995;117(1):37-40. [Medline].

  41. Maton PN, Gardner JD, Jensen RT. Use of long-acting somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 in patients with pancreatic islet cell tumors. Dig Dis Sci. Mar 1989;34(3 Suppl):28S-39S. [Medline].

  42. Moertel CG, Lefkopoulo M, Lipsitz S, Hahn RG, Klaassen D. Streptozocin-doxorubicin, streptozocin-fluorouracil or chlorozotocin in the treatment of advanced islet-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Feb 20 1992;326(8):519-23. [Medline].

  43. Moug SJ, Leen E, Horgan PG, Imrie CW. Radiofrequency ablation has a valuable therapeutic role in metastatic VIPoma. Pancreatology. 2006;6(1-2):155-9. [Medline].

  44. Murphy MS, Sibal A, Mann JR. Persistent diarrhoea and occult vipomas in children. BMJ. Jun 3 2000;320(7248):1524-6. [Medline].

  45. Nguyen HN, Backes B, Lammert F, Wildberger J, Winograd R, Busch N, et al. Long-term survival after diagnosis of hepatic metastatic VIPoma: report of two cases with disparate courses and review of therapeutic options. Dig Dis Sci. Jun 1999;44(6):1148-55. [Medline].

  46. Nikou GC, Toubanakis C, Nikolaou P, Giannatou E, Safioleas M, Mallas E. VIPomas: an update in diagnosis and management in a series of 11 patients. Hepatogastroenterology. Jul-Aug 2005;52(64):1259-65. [Medline].

  47. Nobels FR, Kwekkeboom DJ, Bouillon R, Lamberts SW. Chromogranin A: its clinical value as marker of neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Clin Invest. Jun 1998;28(6):431-40. [Medline].

  48. Oberg K, Eriksson B. Endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. Oct 2005;19(5):753-81. [Medline].

  49. Onozawa M, Fukuhara T, Minoguchi M, Takahata M, Yamamoto Y, Miyake T. Hypokalemic rhabdomyolysis due to WDHA syndrome caused by VIP-producing composite pheochromocytoma: a case in neurofibromatosis type 1. Jpn J Clin Oncol. Sep 2005;35(9):559-63. [Medline].

  50. Orlefors H, Sundin A, Ahlstrom H, Bjurling P, Bergstrom M, Lilja A, et al. Positron emission tomography with 5-hydroxytryprophan in neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. Jul 1998;16(7):2534-41. [Medline].

  51. Park SK, O'Dorisio MS, O'Dorisio TM. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-secreting tumours: biology and therapy. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. Dec 1996;10(4):673-96. [Medline].

  52. Pederzoli P, Bassi C, Falconi M, Camboni MG. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of complications of elective pancreatic surgery. Italian Study Group. Br J Surg. Feb 1994;81(2):265-9. [Medline].

  53. Phan GQ, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Cameron JL. Surgical experience with pancreatic and peripancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: review of 125 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. Sep-Oct 1998;2(5):472-82. [Medline].

  54. Pratz KW, Ma C, Aubry MC, Vrtiska TJ, Erlichman C. Large cell carcinoma with calcitonin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-associated Verner-Morrison syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc. Jan 2005;80(1):116-20. [Medline].

  55. Ram R, Natanzi N, Saadat P, Eliav D, Vadmal MS. Skin metastasis of pancreatic vasoactive intestinal polypeptide tumor: case report and review of the literature. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2006;142(7):946-7. [Medline].

  56. Remme CA, de Groot GH, Schrijver G. Diagnosis and treatment of VIPoma in a female patient. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jan 2006;18(1):93-9. [Medline].

  57. Rigabert J, De Clermont H. [Diagnostic procedures and more particularly, place of scintigraphy in neuroendocrine tumors, example of vipoma in MEN 1]. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). Jun 2007;68(2-3):199-203. [Medline].

  58. Rindi G, Candusso ME, Solcia E. Molecular aspects of the endocrine tumours of the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Oct 1999;31 Suppl 2:S135-8. [Medline].

  59. Schonfeld WH, Eikin EP, Woltering EA, Modlin IM, Anthony L, Villa KF, et al. The cost-effectiveness of octreotide acetate in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome and VIPoma. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. Summer 1998;14(3):514-25. [Medline].

  60. Smith SL, Branton SA, Avino AJ, Martin JK, Klingler PJ, Thompson GB, et al. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide secreting islet cell tumors: a 15-year experience and review of the literature. Surgery. Dec 1998;124(6):1050-5. [Medline].

  61. Stephen AE, Hodin RA. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas, excluding gastrinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Jul 2006;15(3):497-510. [Medline].

  62. Tauber MT, Harris AG, Rochiccioli P. Clinical use of the long acting somatostatin analogue octreotide in pediatrics. Eur J Pediatr. May 1994;153(5):304-10. [Medline].

  63. Tomassetti P, Migliori M, Gullo L. Slow-release lanreotide treatment in endocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Am J Gastroenterol. Sep 1998;93(9):1468-71. [Medline].

  64. Virgolini I, Traub-Weidinger T, Decristoforo C. Nuclear medicine in the detection and management of pancreatic islet-cell tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. Jun 2005;19(2):213-27. [Medline].

  65. Warner RR. Enteroendocrine tumors other than carcinoid: a review of clinically significant advances. Gastroenterology. May 2005;128(6):1668-84. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

pancreatic cholera; Verner-Morrison syndrome; VIPoma syndrome; watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and achlorhydria syndrome; vasoactive intestinal peptide; VIP; non–beta pancreatic islet cells; dehydration; hypokalemia; ganglioneuroma; ganglioneuroblastoma; hypercalcemia; hyperglycemia; hypochlorhydria; flushing; multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome; MEN-1 syndrome; Werner syndrome; watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and hypochlorhydria syndrome; WDHH syndrome; amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation tumors; APUD tumors; APUDomas

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Sandeep Mukherjee, MB, BCh, MPH, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Randall E Brand, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Randall E Brand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Pancreatic Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Richard K Gilroy, MBBS, FRACP, Assistant Professor, Medical Director of Liver Transplantation and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Daniel Schafer, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Manoop S Bhutani, MD, FACG, FACP, Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Director, Center for Endoscopic Ultrasound, Co-Director, Center for Endoscopic Research, Training and Innovation, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Manoop S Bhutani, MD, FACG, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

BS Anand, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Professor, Baylor University College of Medicine
BS Anand, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP, Assistant Dean for Medical Curriculum, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, and Society of General Internal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Julian Katz, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the Medical College of Pennsylvania
Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law Medicine and Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.