eMedicine Specialties > Gastroenterology > Biliary

Bile Duct Strictures: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: William R Brugge, MD, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital
Coauthor(s): Ashraf Saleemuddin, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center; Hemant Pande, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Gastroenterology, Leesville Surgical Clinic and Digestive Disease Center; Parviz Nikoomanesh, MD, Clinical Director of Gastroenterology, Director of Endoscopy, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Lawrence J Cheskin, MD, Associate Professor, International Health/Human Nutrition, JH Bloomberg School of Public Health; Joint Appointment, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Mar 27, 2009

Differential Diagnoses

Choledocholithiasis

Other Problems to Be Considered

Autoimmune cholangiopathy
Cholestasis associated with parenteral nutrition
Cholestasis associated with sepsis
Drug-induced cholestasis
Postoperative jaundice
Primary sclerosing cholangitis
Primary biliary cirrhosis

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Patients with partial bile duct obstruction have elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT, GGTP). The serum of patients with clinically apparent jaundice shows increases in total and conjugated bilirubin. Alkaline phosphatase levels are increased to more than 3 times normal. Elevated alkaline phosphatase levels are accompanied by increases in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and 5' nucleotidase, usually disproportionate to serum transaminase levels. Serum aminotransferase levels are usually less than 300 IU/mL.
  • The prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) may be prolonged and can usually be normalized with parenteral administration of vitamin K. Total cholesterol and lipoprotein levels may be elevated in patients with chronic cholestatic disorders.
  • In malignant bile duct strictures (biliary strictures) with complete obstruction, the level of total serum bilirubin is generally much higher than that observed in benign strictures, and a bilirubin level of greater than 20 mg/dL is highly suggestive of malignant obstruction. Again, in malignant strictures causing only partial obstruction (eg, Klatskin tumor), a rise in the alkaline phosphatase level may not be accompanied by a rise in the bilirubin level.
  • Other laboratory abnormalities sometimes observed are anemia, elevated amylase and lipase levels, and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level.
  • Several tumor markers may be helpful in the diagnosis of malignant bile duct strictures (biliary strictures). A serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) value of greater than 100 U/mL is 55-65% sensitive for cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer.18 One study found that serum trypsinogen-2 is a useful marker for diagnosing patients with cholangiocarcinoma.19 It is unclear whether trypsinogen-2 could be a new method to screen PSC or whether tumor marker combinations would be more useful. Elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels may be present in 50-70% of cases of pancreatic cancer, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are elevated in as many as 60% cases of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Imaging Studies

  • In patients presenting acutely with features of cholangitis, the initial radiologic study should be an urgent right upper quadrant ultrasonogram. If the ultrasonographic (US) examination findings show dilated bile ducts but do not provide clues to the site or cause of the obstruction, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning should be performed next. In some patients, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be needed for definitive diagnosis and has the advantage of being therapeutic (see Images 1-2 and 4-7, or below).
    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic i...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic image of a cholangiocarcinoma at the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (Klatskin tumor).

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic i...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic image of a cholangiocarcinoma at the bifurcation of the right and left hepatic ducts (Klatskin tumor).


    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating a long bile duct stricture that represents external compression by gallbladder cancer.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating a long bile duct stricture that represents external compression by gallbladder cancer.


    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic i...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic image of a cholangiogram in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma whose condition has been treated with a metal stent.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic i...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic image of a cholangiogram in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma whose condition has been treated with a metal stent.


    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram of a solitary benign stricture of the distal bile duct. Resection demonstrated sclerosing cholangitis.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram of a solitary benign stricture of the distal bile duct. Resection demonstrated sclerosing cholangitis.


    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating an isolated mid-hepatic duct stricture as a result of pancreatic cancer.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating an isolated mid-hepatic duct stricture as a result of pancreatic cancer.


    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating diffuse stricturing of the intrahepatic ducts that is consistent with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic c...

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic cholangiogram demonstrating diffuse stricturing of the intrahepatic ducts that is consistent with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

  • US20
    • US generally is considered the imaging modality of choice for the initial screening of biliary disorders. US does not use ionizing radiation to create the image, and it is the least invasive radiologic technique for imaging the biliary tract. The technique is portable, quick, and the technique of choice in pregnant women and in patients with contrast allergies. US can help differentiate between intrinsic liver diseases and extrahepatic obstruction. Furthermore, US is more sensitive for detecting stones in the gallbladder.
    • US can accurately detect dilatation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, thus providing indirect evidence for the presence of bile duct strictures. However, US is less accurate for determining the etiology and level of obstruction.
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and PSC may cause biliary obstruction without ductal dilatation, and some benign strictures with partial obstruction may not be associated with biliary dilatation.
    • The sensitivity of US also depends on the degree of obstruction; it has been found to be 94% with a serum bilirubin level of greater than 10 mg/dL but only a sensitivity of 47% with bilirubin levels of less than 10 mg/dL. The sensitivity increases with the serum bilirubin concentration and the duration of jaundice.
  • CT scanning
    • Spiral CT (SCT) and multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning are highly sensitive for the diagnosis of biliary obstruction, particularly when these modalities are performed with oral and intravenous contrast agents.
    • Similar to US, CT scanning also helps detect intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile duct dilatation; however, the main value of CT scanning is its ability to detect the site of obstruction with greater accuracy than US and to help predict the cause of obstruction, especially malignant obstruction. CT scanning is rather insensitive for detecting stones in the CBD.
    • CT cholangiography scanning is another technique that rivals ERCP in delineating biliary tract abnormalities but has not achieved widespread use because of some adverse reactions to the contrast material.
    • CT scanning is is superior to US in visualizing the distal CBD area, because gas artifacts may obscure this region when examined by US.
    • Other important areas that can be seen better on CT scans are the porta hepatis, pancreas, and liver parenchyma.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    • Since its introduction, MRCP has rapidly become an important tool for visualizing the biliary system.
    • MRCP takes advantage of the fact that bile has a high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, whereas the surrounding structures do not enhance and can be suppressed during image analysis.21
    • MRCP is as sensitive as US for helping detect cholelithiasis and is superior to US for helping diagnose CBD stones, malignant biliary obstruction, and benign pancreatic disease (see Image 11 or below).
    • The presence of biliary dilatation can be accurately detected by MRCP in 97-100% of patients. The level of obstruction is correct in almost 87% cases.
    • In one study, sensitivity for the detection of any abnormality was 89% and and specificity was 92%; for the detection of malignancy, sensitivity was 81% and specificity was 100%. These results were equivalent to the figures for ERCP (91% sensitivity and 92% specificity for any abnormality; 93% sensitivity and 94% specificity for malignant diseases). High-quality MRCP examinations require a high level of patient cooperation.
    • Bile duct calculi also appear as low signal intensity. CBD strictures and stones can be differentiated as a cause of obstruction in most cases.
    • MRCP is also very useful in helping identify cholangiocarcinoma, which characteristically appears as enhancement in delayed images.
    • More importantly, MRCP provides valuable staging information because of its ability to help visualize the hepatic parenchyma and surrounding vascular structures in the same examination.
    • Benign strictures due to sclerosing cholangitis are multifocal and alternate with slight dilatation or normal-caliber bile ducts, producing a beaded appearance.
    • Dilatation of both the pancreatic and bile ducts viewable using MRCP is highly suggestive of a pancreatic head malignancy. Side-branch ectasia is the most prominent and specific feature of chronic pancreatitis. Thus, MRCP provides a viable alternative to ERCP and allows imaging of the biliary tree when ERCP is unsuccessful; however, MRCP does not currently allow any intervention to be performed, such as stone extraction, stent insertion, or biopsy.
  • Hepatic iminodiacetic acid scan
    • A hepatic iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan is a radionuclide scanning technique commonly used for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and biliary leaks. HIDA scanning can help determine the clearance of bile across strictures and surgical anastomosis, thus providing a functional assessment of incomplete strictures and surgical anastomosis.
    • HIDA scanning is also useful for distinguishing cholangitis from cholecystitis. HIDA scan findings suggest complete biliary obstruction if the small intestine is not visualized in 60 minutes.
    • However, HIDA scans are insensitive for helping detect biliary dilatation or the site and cause of bile duct obstruction.

Other Tests

  • Cytology22,23
    • Cytologic sampling is best performed by brushing the bile duct stricture (biliary stricture) during ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). Under optimal conditions and using a variety of techniques, cytology sampling can provide a cytologic diagnosis in 75% of cholangiocarcinomas and 50% of pancreatic carcinomas. The results in practice are more disappointing.
    • Routine cytology and histology yield a high specificity but low sensitivity for determining the etiology of bile duct strictures. Advanced cytologic techniques such as digital image analysis (DIA) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identify chromosomal abnormalities and improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity. DIA and FISH enhance the accuracy of standard techniques in evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures, allowing the diagnosis of malignancy in a substantial number of patients with false-negative cytology and histology. The sensitivity of FISH could improve the clinical management of patients being evaluated for malignant bile duct strictures (biliary strictures) by enabling a definitive diagnosis at earlier stages in the clinical evaluation.
    • Cytologic brushing of bile duct strictures (biliary strictures) is usually performed with wire guidance across the stricture. A plastic brush collects the cytologic specimen from the lining of the bile duct during an ERCP. There is little morbidity associated with brushing of the bile duct.
    • Histologic sampling of a bile duct stricture is performed with an unguided biopsy forceps. This technique is particularly effective for exophytic lesions.

Procedures

  • ERCP
    • ERCP has been used for the examination of the pancreaticobiliary region for more than 30 years, and it is still the criterion standard.
    • The endoscope used for ERCP is a side-viewing duodenoscope that has the capacity to control the direction of catheters as they exit the instrument channel of the scope. The endoscopist localizes the ampulla of Vater, which is on the medial wall of the second portion of duodenum; and the entrance to the bile and pancreatic ducts contained within the ampulla of Vater is then cannulated with specialized catheters.
    • This is followed by injection of contrast media into the bile and pancreatic ducts under continuous fluoroscopic monitoring, with visualization of the anatomy of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and the pancreatic duct.
    • ERCP is a valuable technique in biliary disease because other diagnostic maneuvers (eg, sphincter of Oddi manometry) and therapeutic interventions (eg, stone extraction, biliary drainage, stent placement) can be carried out at the same time as the primary diagnosis. The success rate of ERCP is often 90-95%, with a complication rate of approximately 3-5%. The success rate of ERCP is decreased in the presence of a Billroth II, Whipple, or Roux-en-Y anatomy.
    • ERCP can help detect intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary dilatation, stones, and the site of bile duct stricture with the highest sensitivity and specificity (both approximately 90-100%). ERCP findings are also valuable for helping differentiate malignant from benign biliary obstruction. Infectious causes of biliary obstruction can be diagnosed using collected bile samples or brushings.
    • Usually, performing ERCP is highly diagnostic for PSC. ERCP findings show areas of irregular stricturing and dilatation (ie, beading) of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree. However, the risk of cholangitis is greater in patients with PSC. Care should be taken to avoid poor biliary drainage after ERCP in patients with PSC.
    • ERCP is also the criterion standard for the diagnosis of AIDS-related cholangitis and is essential for differentiating PSC from AIDS-related cholangitis.
    • Nevertheless, ERCP is associated with significant complications, including pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, infection, and cardiopulmonary depression from conscious sedation.
  • Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)
    • EUS involves the use of echoendoscopes, which have an US transducer mounted at the end of a side-viewing or oblique-viewing endoscope.
    • The linear-array EUS system also has color Doppler capability, enabling the endosonographer to be able to differentiate between vascular and fluid-filled structures. The extrahepatic bile duct is readily imaged from the duodenum.
    • The instrument also has a small biopsy channel for fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and fine-needle injection.
    • The pancreas, CBD, and the gallbladder are in close proximity to the distal stomach and the duodenum and can be viewed. EUS can help detect choledocholithiasis, especially small stones, with a sensitivity of more than 95%.
    • EUS and EUS-guided FNA is a sensitive technique for the diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder, ampullary, and pancreatic cancer because it can also help detect involvement of regional lymph nodes and vascular invasion by the tumor (an advantage over ERCP in this regard).
    • EUS is also superior to CT scanning for tumor, node, and metastases (TNM) staging of luminal and pancreaticobiliary malignancies. Porta hepatis lymph nodes are particularly well seen with EUS, in contrast to the relative inability of CT scanning to evaluate the porta region.
  • PTC
    • Since the 1960s, PTC has been used for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract disorders.
    • The technique consists of introducing a 22- or 23-gauge needle through the skin in the right ninth or tenth intercostal space in the midaxillary line and advancing into the liver parenchyma under fluoroscopic guidance. Contrast material is injected while the needle is slowly withdrawn, until the bile ducts are opacified.
    • Indications for PTC in bile duct strictures (biliary strictures) are the presence of biliary-enteric anastomosis (eg, Roux-en-Y anastomosis with hepaticojejunostomy, choledochojejunostomy, Billroth II gastrectomy), the presence of complex hilar strictures, or when ERCP is unsuccessful. Both the right and left ductal systems can be accessed using this technique.
    • The success rate of PTC approaches 100% when ducts are dilated. This technique is used for complex intrahepatic strictures or when ERCP is not possible.
    • Therapeutic intervention, including biliary drainage, dilation of benign bile duct strictures (biliary strictures), extraction of biliary tract stones, or placement of a stent across a malignant stricture also can be performed at the same time (see Images 13 and 15).
      This image is an example of an intraoperative cho...

      This image is an example of an intraoperative cholangiogram performed during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

      This image is an example of an intraoperative cho...

      This image is an example of an intraoperative cholangiogram performed during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.


      Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram with ball...

      Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram with balloon dilation of a postoperative bile duct stricture.

      Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram with ball...

      Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram with balloon dilation of a postoperative bile duct stricture.

    • Complications, including sepsis, bile leak, intraperitoneal hemorrhage, hemobilia, hepatic and perihepatic abscess, pneumothorax, and skin infection and granuloma at the catheter entry site, can occur in as many as 10% of cases.
    • PTC is contraindicated in patients with bleeding diatheses and significant ascites. Patients should be warned before the procedure about the possibility of external drainage.
  • Fistulography
    • In postsurgery patients with an external biliary fistula or T tube, contrast medium can be injected into the biliary system through the tube or the fistula.
    • This outlines the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and delineates the site of stricture and the anatomy of the fistula.
    • This study can precipitate cholangitis; therefore, patients should receive antibiotic prophylaxis.

Histologic Findings

Surgically resected segments of the biliary tree will show the etiology of the bile duct stricture. In benign lesions the involved segment of the bile duct is surrounded by a collar of fibrosis causing a narrowing of the lumen (see Image 8 or below). This is accompanied by a variable amount of inflammatory cellular infiltrate comprising a mixture of neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells, and eosinophils. The mucosa of the strictured segment usually is atrophic, with areas of squamous metaplasia.

Periductal onion skin fibrosis seen in primary sc...

Periductal onion skin fibrosis seen in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Periductal onion skin fibrosis seen in primary sc...

Periductal onion skin fibrosis seen in primary sclerosing cholangitis.


In cholangiocarcinoma, there will be evidence of adenocarcinoma in the cross-sectional histology of the bile duct. In contrast, in autoimmune disease, the hallmark finding is dense lymphocytic infiltration (see Image 9 or below).

Periductal lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate...

Periductal lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate that is consistent with autoimmune cholangiopathy.

Periductal lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate...

Periductal lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate that is consistent with autoimmune cholangiopathy.


Staging

Staging systems have been developed for bile duct strictures (biliary strictures) due to operative trauma, cholangiocarcinoma, and HIV disease. The choice of operative repair of a bile duct stricture depends on the location of the stricture. Strictures involving the CBD and low common hepatic duct are easier to repair compared with strictures that are more proximal.

  • In 1982, Bismuth proposed an anatomic classification of bile duct strictures (biliary strictures), based on location, into the following 5 types:
    • Type 1: This is a low common hepatic duct stricture. At least 2 cm of the hepatic duct is intact.
    • Type 2: This is a mid common hepatic duct stricture. The hepatic duct stump is smaller than 2 cm.
    • Type 3: This is a hilar stricture. The common hepatic duct is not involved, but the confluence of right and left hepatic ducts is intact.
    • Type 4: In this type of bile duct stricture, the hilar confluence is destroyed. The right and left hepatic ducts are separated.
    • Type 5: The aberrant right sectorial duct is involved, alone or with the CBD.
  • The modified Bismuth and Corlett classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most widely adopted anatomic classification of this tumor. The following 4 types are recognized:
    • Type 1: The confluence of the hepatic ducts is not involved, but the tumor is generally within 2 cm of the hilum.
    • Type 2: The obstruction is limited to the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts.
    • Type 3a: The confluence is involved, with extension of the tumor into the right hepatic duct.
    • Type 3b: The confluence is involved, with extension of the tumor into the left hepatic duct.
    • Type 4: The tumor is multicentric or extends into the right and left hepatic ducts.
  • Using ERCP, 4 distinct patterns of HIV cholangiopathy have been described, as follows:
    • Papillary stenosis: This occurs in approximately 15-25% of patients. A smooth distal tapering of the CBD associated with proximal dilatation to wider than 8 mm is present. Contrast is retained beyond 30 minutes.
    • Sclerosing cholangitis: This pattern is observed in 20% of patients and is characterized by focal strictures and dilatations involving intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. The caliber of extrahepatic ducts is normal.
    • Combined papillary stenosis and sclerosing cholangitis: This is the most common pattern of HIV cholangiopathy and is observed in more than 50% of cases.
    • Long strictures of extrahepatic bile ducts: This pattern is observed in approximately 15% of patients. The strictures are 1-2 cm long and do not have features suggesting another cause, such as prevous biliary surgery or pancreatitis.

More on Bile Duct Strictures

Overview: Bile Duct Strictures
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Bile Duct Strictures
Treatment & Medication: Bile Duct Strictures
Follow-up: Bile Duct Strictures
Multimedia: Bile Duct Strictures
References
Further Reading

References

  1. Vecchio R, Ferrara M, Pucci L, Meli G, Latteri S. [Treatment of iatrogenic lesions of the common bile duct] [Italian]. Minerva Chir. Jan-Feb 1995;50(1-2):29-38. [Medline].

  2. Hanau LH, Steigbigel NH. Acute (ascending) cholangitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Sep 2000;14(3):521-46. [Medline].

  3. Hastier P, Buckley JM, Peten EP, Dumas R, Delmont J. Long term treatment of biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis with a metallic stent. Am J Gastroenterol. Jul 1999;94(7):1947-8. [Medline].

  4. Deviere J, Cremer M, Baize M, et al. Management of common bile duct stricture caused by chronic pancreatitis with metal mesh self expandable stents. Gut. Jan 1994;35(1):122-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  5. Kamisawa T, Tu Y, Egawa N, et al. Involvement of pancreatic and bile ducts in autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28 2006;12(4):612-4. [Medline][Full Text].

  6. Magistrelli P, Masetti R, Coppola R, et al. Changing attitudes in the palliation of proximal malignant biliary obstruction. J Surg Oncol Suppl. 1993;3:151-3. [Medline].

  7. Klein AS, Savader S, Burdick JF, et al. Reduction of morbidity and mortality from biliary complications after liver transplantation. Hepatology. Nov 1991;14(5):818-23. [Medline].

  8. Orons PD, Sheng R, Zajko AB. Hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients: prevalence and cholangiographic appearance of associated biliary complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1995;165(5):1145-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  9. Mosca S, Militerno G, Guardascione MA, et al. Late biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Jun 2000;15(6):654-60. [Medline].

  10. Pozsar J, Sahin P, Laszlo F, Topa L. Endoscopic treatment of sphincterotomy-associated distal common bile duct strictures by using sequential insertion of multiple plastic stents. Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 2005;62(1):85-91. [Medline].

  11. Schwartz DA, Petersen BT, Poterucha JJ, Gostout CJ. Endoscopic therapy of anastomotic bile duct strictures occurring after liver transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 2000;51(2):169-74. [Medline].

  12. Cherqui D, Palazzo L, Piedbois P, et al. Common bile duct stricture as a late complication of upper abdominal radiotherapy. J Hepatol. Jun 1994;20(6):693-7. [Medline].

  13. Nakakubo Y, Kondo S, Katoh H, Shimizu M. Biliary stricture as a possible late complication of radiation therapy. Hepatogastroenterology. Nov-Dec 2000;47(36):1531-2. [Medline].

  14. Cello JP. Human immunodeficiency virus-associated biliary tract disease. Semin Liver Dis. May 1992;12(2):213-8. [Medline].

  15. Nash JA, Cohen SA. Gallbladder and biliary tract disease in AIDS. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. Jun 1997;26(2):323-35. [Medline].

  16. Colonna JO 2nd, Shaked A, Gomes AS, et al. Biliary strictures complicating liver transplantation. Incidence, pathogenesis, management, and outcome. Ann Surg. Sep 1992;216(3):344-50; discussion 350-2. [Medline][Full Text].

  17. Fan ST, Ng IO, Choi TK, Lai EC. Tuberculosis of the bile duct: a rare cause of biliary stricture. Am J Gastroenterol. Apr 1989;84(4):413-4. [Medline].

  18. Patel AH, Harnois DM, Klee GG, LaRusso NF, Gores GJ. The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. Jan 2000;95(1):204-7. [Medline].

  19. Lempinen M, Isoniemi H, Makisalo H, et al. Enhanced detection of cholangiocarcinoma with serum trypsinogen-2 in patients with severe bile duct strictures. J Hepatol. Nov 2007;47(5):677-83. [Medline].

  20. Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna E, Battezzati P, Stevens P. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy. Aug 2005;37(8):715-21. [Medline].

  21. Best Evidence: Nandalur KR, Hussain HK, Weadock WJ, et al. Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology. Dec 2008;249(3):883-90. [Medline].

  22. Mansfield JC, Griffin SM, Wadehra V, Matthewson K. A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures. Gut. May 1997;40(5):671-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  23. Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Halling SA, et al. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. Sep 2004;99(9):1675-81. [Medline].

  24. [Best Evidence] Best Evidence: Gong Y, Huang ZB, Christensen E, Gluud C. Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jul 16 2008;CD000551. [Medline][Full Text].

  25. [Best Evidence] Best Evidence: Mahid SS, Jafri NS, Brangers BC, et al. Meta-analysis of cholecystectomy in symptomatic patients with positive hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan results without gallstones. Arch Surg. Feb 2009;144(2):180-7. [Medline].

  26. [Best Evidence] Best Evidence: Olsen JC, McGrath NA, Schwarz DG, Cutcliffe BJ, Stern JL. A double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluating the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac versus butorphanol for patients with suspected biliary colic in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. Aug 2008;15(8):718-22. [Medline].

  27. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. Jan 1992;215(1):31-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  28. Bjornsson E, Lindqvist-Ottosson J, Asztely M, Olsson R. Dominant strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. Mar 2004;99(3):502-8. [Medline].

  29. Brugge WR. Endoscopic techniques to diagnose and manage biliary tumors. J Clin Oncol. Jul 10 2005;23(20):4561-5. [Medline].

  30. Bueno JT, Gerdes H, Kurtz RC. Endoscopic management of occluded biliary Wallstents: a cancer center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 2003;58(6):879-84. [Medline].

  31. Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Pappalardo G. Benign biliary strictures: a review of 21 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg. Nov 1996;183(5):506-13. [Medline].

  32. Gibbons JC, Williams SJ. Progress in the endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 1998;13(2):116-24. [Medline].

  33. Ishizuka D, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Ischemic biliary stricture due to lymph node dissection in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Hepatogastroenterology. Nov-Dec 1998;45(24):2048-50. [Medline].

  34. Itani KM, Taylor TV. The challenge of therapy for pancreatitis-related common bile duct stricture. Am J Surg. Dec 1995;170(6):543-6. [Medline].

  35. Kadir S, White RI Jr. Biliary stricture dilatation: multicenter review of clinical management in 73 patients. Radiology. Jan 1987;162(1 pt 1):286. [Medline][Full Text].

  36. Kim KH, Sung CK, Park BG, et al. Clinical significance of intrahepatic biliary stricture in efficacy of hepatic resection for intrahepatic stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(3):303-8. [Medline].

  37. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC, et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. May 2008;103(5):1263-73. [Medline].

  38. Lipsett PA, Pitt HA, Colombani PM, Boitnott JK, Cameron JL. Choledochal cyst disease. A changing pattern of presentation. Ann Surg. Nov 1994;220(5):644-52. [Medline][Full Text].

  39. Lombard M, Farrant M, Karani J, Westaby D, Williams R. Improving biliary-enteric drainage in primary sclerosing cholangitis: experience with endoscopic methods. Gut. Nov 1991;32(11):1364-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  40. Maier M, Kohler B, Benz C, Korber H, Riemann JF. [Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS)--an important supplement in diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract diseases (indications, technique and results)] [German]. Z Gastroenterol. Aug 1995;33(8):435-9. [Medline].

  41. McDonald ML, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Ilstrup DM, Kutch JM. Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach. Surgery. Oct 1995;118(4):582-90; discussion 590-1. [Medline].

  42. Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, et al. Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. Dec 1998;93(12):2482-90. [Medline].

  43. Moore AV Jr, Illescas FF, Mills SR, et al. Percutaneous dilation of benign biliary strictures. Radiology. Jun 1987;163(3):625-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  44. Morrison MC, Lee MJ, Saini S, Brink JA, Mueller PR. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of benign biliary strictures. Radiol Clin North Am. Nov 1990;28(6):1191-201. [Medline].

  45. Nealon WH, Urrutia F. Long-term follow-up after bilioenteric anastomosis for benign bile duct stricture. Ann Surg. Jun 1996;223(6):639-45; discussion 645-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  46. Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Maier M, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting for the palliation of pancreatic cancer: results, survival predictive factors, and comparison of 10-French with 11.5-French gauge stents. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 1996;91(10):2179-84. [Medline].

  47. Rosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, et al. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 2004;60(3):390-6. [Medline].

  48. Roslyn JJ, Binns GS, Hughes EF. Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients. Ann Surg. Aug 1993;218(2):129-37. [Medline].

  49. Shah RJ, Langer DA, Antillon MR, Chen YK. Cholangioscopy and cholangioscopic forceps biopsy in patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2006;4(2):219-25. [Medline].

  50. Smits ME, Rauws EA, van Gulik TM, et al. Long-term results of endoscopic stenting and surgical drainage for biliary stricture due to chronic pancreatitis. Br J Surg. Jun 1996;83(6):764-8. [Medline].

  51. Tenner S, Roston A, Lichtenstein D, et al. Eosinophilic cholangiopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 1997;45(3):307-9. [Medline].

  52. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, et al. Management of benign biliary strictures: biliary enteric anastomosis vs endoscopic stenting. Arch Surg. Feb 2000;135(2):153-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  53. Vitale GC, George M, McIntyre K. Endoscopic management of benign and malignant biliary strictures. Am J Surg. Jun 1996;171(6):553-7. [Medline].

  54. Vitale GC, Larson GM, George M, Tatum C. Management of malignant biliary stricture with self-expanding metallic stent. Surg Endosc. Oct 1996;10(10):970-3. [Medline].

Further Reading

Best Evidence

Clinical Trials

National Guidelines Clearinghouse

Keywords

bile duct strictures, biliary stricture, biliary stenosis, bile duct stenosis, bile duct constriction,  operative trauma, surgical trauma, ascending cholangitis, liver abscess, secondary biliary cirrhosis, pancreatic cancer, benign strictures, malignant strictures, bile duct injury, pancreatitis, bile duct stones, choledocholithiasis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, PSC, postoperative bile duct stricture, cholecystectomy, Charcot triad, cholangiocarcinoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

William R Brugge, MD, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Director, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital
William R Brugge, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Clinical Research, American Gastroenterological Association, American Pancreatic Association, American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and Crohns and Colitis Foundation of America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ashraf Saleemuddin, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Hemant Pande, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Gastroenterology, Leesville Surgical Clinic and Digestive Disease Center
Hemant Pande, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Parviz Nikoomanesh, MD, Clinical Director of Gastroenterology, Director of Endoscopy, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Parviz Nikoomanesh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Lawrence J Cheskin, MD, Associate Professor, International Health/Human Nutrition, JH Bloomberg School of Public Health; Joint Appointment, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lawrence J Cheskin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, and American Gastroenterological Association
Disclosure: Medifast Salary Employment; Mushroom Council Grant/research funds research grant; Pharmaceutical Companies Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Medical Editor

David Greenwald, MD, Fellowship Program Director, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
David Greenwald, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

James L Achord, MD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
James L Achord, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Mississippi State Medical Association, New York Academy of Sciences, Sigma Xi, and Southern Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP, Associate Dean for Undergraduate Medical Education, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Alex J Mechaber, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, and Society of General Internal Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Julian Katz, MD, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital of the Medical College of Pennsylvania
Julian Katz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Gastroenterology, American College of Physicians, American Gastroenterological Association, American Geriatrics Society, American Medical Association, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Society of Law Medicine and Ethics, American Trauma Society, Association of American Medical Colleges, and Physicians for Social Responsibility
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

RELATED EMEDICINE ARTICLES
Patient Education
 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.