Wound Infection Differential Diagnoses
- Author: Hemant Singhal, MD, MBBS, FRCSE, FRCS(C); Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA more...
Breasted D. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus. University of Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1930.
Bryan PW. The Papyrus Ebers. London/Washington DC: Government Printing Office; 1883.
Cohen IK. A Brief History of Wound Healing. Yardley, Pa: Oxford Clinical Communications Inc; 1998.
Lister J. On a new method of treating compound fractures. Lancet. 1867;1:326-329,387-389,507-509.
Qvist G. Hunterian Oration, 1979. Some controversial aspects of John Hunter's life and work. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. Jul 1979;61(4):309-11. [Medline].
Helling TS, Daon E. In Flanders fields: the Great War, Antoine Depage, and the resurgence of débridement. Ann Surg. Aug 1998;228(2):173-81. [Medline].
Emori TG, Gaynes RP. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. Oct 1993;6(4):428-42. [Medline].
Mayon-White RT, Ducel G, Kereselidze T, et al. An international survey of the prevalence of hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect. Feb 1988;11 Suppl A:43-8. [Medline].
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. Apr 1999;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80. [Medline].
Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. Nov 1999;20(11):725-30. [Medline].
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. NNIS report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996. A report from the NNIS System. Am J Infect Control. Oct 1996;24(5):380-8. [Medline].
Di Leo A, Piffer S, Ricci F, et al. Surgical site infections in an Italian surgical ward: a prospective study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). Aug 18 2009;[Medline].
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System. NNIS report, data summary from January 1992 to June 2002, issued August 2002. Am J Infect Control. Dec 2002;30(8):458-75. [Medline].
Krizek TJ, Robson MC. Evolution of quantitative bacteriology in wound management. Am J Surg. Nov 1975;130(5):579-84. [Medline].
Hsiao CH, Chuang CC, Tan HY, Ma DH, Lin KK, Chang CJ, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Ocular Infection: A 10-Year Hospital-Based Study. Ophthalmology. Dec 14 2011;[Medline].
Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. Feb 1980;60(1):27-40. [Medline].
Burke JF. The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery. Jul 1961;50:161-8. [Medline].
Barchitta M, Matranga D, Quattrocchi A, Bellocchi P, Ruffino M, Basile G, et al. Prevalence of surgical site infections before and after the implementation of a multimodal infection control programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. Nov 29 2011;[Medline].
Gupta R, Sinnett D, Carpenter R, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for post-operative wound infection in clean elective breast surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. Jun 2000;26(4):363-6. [Medline].
Platt R, Zucker JR, Zaleznik DF, et al. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound infection following breast surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 1993;31 Suppl B:43-8. [Medline].
Woodfield JC, Beshay N, van Rij AM. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials assessing the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone. A study of wound, chest, and urinary infections. World J Surg. Aug 2 2009;[Medline].
Woods RK, Dellinger EP. Current guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wounds. Am Fam Physician. Jun 1998;57(11):2731-40. [Medline].
Mahmoud NN, Turpin RS, Yang G, et al. Impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and costs in selected colorectal procedures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). Aug 26 2009;[Medline].
Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. Sep 16 1991;91(3B):152S-157S. [Medline].
Anesthesiology. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111.
Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part I. Intravascular device-related infections: an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. Aug 1996;24(4):262-77. [Medline].
Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. May 1 2001;32(9):1249-72. [Medline].
Dettenkofer M, Wilson C, Gratwohl A, et al. Skin disinfection with octenidine dihydrochloride for central venous catheter site care: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect. Aug 17 2009;[Medline].
Haley RW, Schaberg DR, Crossley KB, et al. Extra charges and prolongation of stay attributable to nosocomial infections: a prospective interhospital comparison. Am J Med. Jan 1981;70(1):51-8. [Medline].
Eagye KJ, Kim A, Laohavaleeson S, et al. Surgical site infections: does inadequate antibiotic therapy affect patient outcomes?. Surg Infect (Larchmt). Aug 2009;10(4):323-31. [Medline].
Baquero F. Gram-positive resistance: challenge for the development of new antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. May 1997;39 Suppl A:1-6. [Medline].
Belda FJ, Aguilera L, Garcia de la Asuncion J, et al. Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Oct 26 2005;294(16):2035-42. [Medline].
Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. Jun 15 2004;38(12):1706-15. [Medline].
Buggy D. Can anaesthetic management influence surgical-wound healing?. Lancet. Jul 29 2000;356(9227):355-7. [Medline].
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevent antimicrobial resistance in health care settings. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/healthcare/problem.htm.
Coello R, Charlett A, Wilson J, et al. Adverse impact of surgical site infections in English hospitals. J Hosp Infect. Jun 2005;60(2):93-103. [Medline].
Gaynes RP. Surgical-site infections (SSI) and the NNIS Basic SSI Risk Index, part II: room for improvement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. May 2001;22(5):266-7. [Medline].
Heinzelmann M, Scott M, Lam T. Factors predisposing to bacterial invasion and infection. Am J Surg. Feb 2002;183(2):179-90. [Medline].
Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med. May 9 1996;334(19):1209-15. [Medline].
Latham R, Lancaster AD, Covington JF, et al. The association of diabetes and glucose control with surgical-site infections among cardiothoracic surgery patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. Oct 2001;22(10):607-12. [Medline].
Nathens AB, Dellinger EP. Surgical site infections. Curr Treatment Options Infect Dis. 2000;2:347-348.
Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Service (NINSS). Surgical site infection in English hospitals: a national surveillance and quality improvement program. Public Health Laboratory Service. 2002.
- Table 1. Pathogens Commonly Associated with Wound Infections and Frequency of Occurrence[11]
- Table 2: Surgical Wound Classification and Subsequent Risk of Infection (If No Antibiotics Used)[11, 16]
- Table 3. Recommendations for Prophylactic Antibiotics as Indicated by Probable Infective Microorganism Involved[11, 22]
- Table 4. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification of Physical Status[25]
- Table 5. Predictive Percentage of SSI Occurrence by Wound Type and Risk Index*[24]
- Table 6. Data Support Recommendations
| Pathogen | Frequency (%) |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 20 |
| Coagulase-negative staphylococci | 14 |
| Enterococci | 12 |
| Escherichia coli | 8 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 8 |
| Enterobacter species | 7 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 3 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 3 |
| Other streptococci | 3 |
| Candida albicans | 3 |
| Group D streptococci | 2 |
| Other gram-positive aerobes | 2 |
| Bacteroides fragilis | 2 |
| Classification | Description | Infective Risk (%) |
| Clean (Class I) | Uninfected operative wound No acute inflammation Closed primarily Respiratory, gastrointestinal, biliary, and urinary tracts not entered No break in aseptic technique Closed drainage used if necessary | < 2 |
| Clean-contaminated (Class II) | Elective entry into respiratory, biliary, gastrointestinal, urinary tracts and with minimal spillage No evidence of infection or major break in aseptic technique Example: appendectomy | < 10 |
| Contaminated (Class III) | Nonpurulent inflammation present Gross spillage from gastrointestinal tract Penetrating traumatic wounds < 4 hours Major break in aseptic technique | About 20 |
| Dirty-infected (Class IV) | Purulent inflammation present Preoperative perforation of viscera Penetrating traumatic wounds >4 hours | About 40 |
| Operation | Expected Pathogens | Recommended Antibiotic |
| Orthopedic surgery (including prosthesis insertion), cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, breast surgery, noncardiac thoracic procedures | S aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Appendectomy, biliary procedures | Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Colorectal surgery | Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes | Cefotetan 1-2 g or cefoxitin 1-2 g plus oral neomycin 1 g and oral erythromycin 1 g (start 19 h preoperatively for 3 doses) |
| Gastroduodenal surgery | Gram-negative bacilli and streptococci | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Vascular surgery | S aureus, Staphylococcusepidermidis, gram-negative bacilli | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Head and neck surgery | S aureus, streptococci, anaerobes and streptococci present in an oropharyngeal approach | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Obstetric and gynecological procedures | Gram-negative bacilli, enterococci, anaerobes, group B streptococci | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| Urology procedures | Gram-negative bacilli | Cefazolin 1-2 g |
| ASA Score | Characteristics |
| 1 | Normal healthy patient |
| 2 | Patient with mild systemic disease |
| 3 | Patient with a severe systemic disease that limits activity but is not incapacitating |
| 4 | Patient with an incapacitating systemic disease that is a constant threat to life |
| 5 | Moribund patient not expected to survive 24 hours with or without operation |
| At Risk Index | Predictive Percentage of SSI |
| 0 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 2.9 |
| 2 | 6.8 |
| 3 | 13.0 |
| *Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) recommendations (partial) for the prevention of SSIs, April 1999 (non–drug based) | |
| Category | Description |
| Category IA | Well designed, experimental, strong; recommended (Category I*) clinical or epidemiological best practice; should be studies; adapted by all practices |
| Category IB | Some experimental, fairly strong; recommended (Category II*) clinical or epidemiological best practice; should be studies and theoretical grounds; adapted by all practices |
| Category II | Fewer scientific supporting data; limited to specific nosocomial (Category III*) problems |
| No recommendation | Insufficient scientific personnel judgment for use (Category III*) supporting data |
| *Previous nomenclature of 1992 CDC guidelines | |

