Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Fluoroscopy Technique

  • Author: Vinod K Panchbhavi, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: Gowthaman Gunabushanam, MD, FRCR  more...
 
Updated: Mar 04, 2014
 

Approach Considerations

Reduction of risks due to ionizing radiation can be achieved by various measures, which involve the design and usage of equipment, use of targeting devices and certain measures that can be taken by the personnel involved.

Next

C-arm Positioning

In vertical positioning, the x-ray source is under the table and the image intensifier is above (see the images below). This positioning is preferable because it reduces scatter radiation, because even the scattered x-rays must pass through the patient before they reach medical personnel in the patient's vicinity. Therefore, exposure due to scatter x-rays is less. The patient should be positioned as far from the x-ray source as practicable to minimize patient skin entrance dose. The image intensifier should be positioned as close to the patient as practicable. This results in a lower patient dose and sharper image.

C-arm being used in for an orthopedic procedure on C-arm being used in for an orthopedic procedure on calcaneus in a vertical orientation, with the image intensifier end above and the x-ray tube end under the table.
Illustration to show optimal options for vertical Illustration to show optimal options for vertical positioning of the C-arm.

Scatter is great in horizontal positioning for cross-table fluoroscopy and in vertical positioning in which the tube is above the table and the part to be screened closer to the image intensifier (see image below). Such positioning should be avoided if possible.

C-arm being used in a horizontal orientation durin C-arm being used in a horizontal orientation during intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture for a cross-table lateral projection.

Lead Shielding

Protection of the patient and other personnel in the vicinity during the conduct of fluoroscopy is an important safety requirement. Lead aprons, lead gloves, lead neck or thyroid shields, lead eyeglasses, lead drapes, and lead glass barriers help reduce the radiation exposure to the personnel. A lead barrier of 0.25-mm lead equivalent thickness typically stops 90% of the x- rays, and a 0.5-mm lead equivalent apron typically absorbs 97% of x-rays.

Safety regulations require that all persons, including staff or other patients, within 2 meters of the tube head, direct beam, or exposed area of the patient’s body be protected by lead shielding of a thickness equivalent to 0.25 mm of lead (Pb). Furthermore, gonadal lead shielding of at least 0.5 mm Pb-equivalent shielding must be used for patients who have not passed reproductive age for radiographic procedures. Since staff aprons are frequently used for this function, current recommendations state that all lead or lead-equivalent aprons be of 0.5 mm Pb-equivalence.

Distance

Radiation dose rate varies inversely to the square of the distance from the source. The main source of radiation exposure to medical personnel is from scattered radiation from the patient, not from the x-ray tube. In the interest of radiation safety, all persons, including staff or other patients, must be as far as possible (at least 2 meters) from the tube head, direct beam, or exposed area of the patient’s body unless protected by lead barriers.

Targeting

The use of a laser-aiming device to help position during fluoroscopy is recommended in an effort to reduce radiation exposure.

Panchbhavi et al reported a prospective study on whether the use of a laser-aiming device attached to the C-arm improves the accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy, in order to reduce, by implication, radiation exposure in the operating room.[4] From March to October 2004, they had 92 consecutive cases requiring use of fluoroscopy for foot and ankle surgery. The number of accurate and inaccurate images with or without the presence of a radiology technician and a laser-aiming device were compared. They found that the accuracy of imaging with the laser-aiming device was higher than the imaging without the device (P < .001). The accuracy of the images obtained by the surgeon was higher than the technicians’ images when laser guidance was used (P = .027). There was no significant difference between the images obtained by the surgeon or the technicians when the aiming device was not used (P = .09).

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Vinod K Panchbhavi, MD, FACS Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Chief, Division of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Director, Foot and Ankle Fellowship Program, Department of Orthopedics, University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine

Vinod K Panchbhavi, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Association, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Orthopaedic Trauma Association, Texas Orthopaedic Association

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Styker.

Chief Editor

Gowthaman Gunabushanam, MD, FRCR Assistant Professor, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine

Gowthaman Gunabushanam, MD, FRCR is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Connecticut State Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges Ms. Suzanne Simpson for literary edits and Mr. Randal P. Morris for the illustration.

References
  1. Rockville, MD. Food and Drug Administration. Public Health Advisory: Avoidance of Serious X-Ray-Induced Skin Injuries to Patients During Fluoroscopically-Guided Procedures. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, FDA. 1994.

  2. Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA. Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994 Jan-Feb. 5(1):71-84. [Medline].

  3. Huda W, Peters KR. Radiation-induced temporary epilation after a neuroradiologically guided embolization procedure. Radiology. 1994 Dec. 193(3):642-4. [Medline].

  4. Panchbhavi VK, Mays MM, Trevino S. Accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy with and without laser guidance in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 May. 33(5):415-9. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
C-arm being used in for an orthopedic procedure on calcaneus in a vertical orientation, with the image intensifier end above and the x-ray tube end under the table.
C-arm being used in a horizontal orientation during intramedullary nail fixation of a tibial fracture for a cross-table lateral projection.
Illustration to show optimal options for vertical positioning of the C-arm.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.