eMedicine Specialties > General Surgery > Abdomen

Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Chat V Dang, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science; Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
Coauthor(s): Jeff Wade, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Long Beach Community Hospital, Greater El Monte Medical Center; Ashis Mandal, MD, Professor, Department of Surgery, Drew University of Medicine and Science and UCLA College of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Sep 2, 2008

Differential Diagnoses

Abdominal Abscess
Esophageal Rupture
Abdominal Angina
Gastric Volvulus
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Helicobacter Pylori Infection
Acute Abdomen and Pregnancy
Ileus
Aortic Dissection
Intestinal Perforation
Appendicitis
Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction: Surgical Perspective
Biliary Colic
Multisystem Organ Failure of Sepsis
Biliary Disease
Myocardial Infarction
Biliary Obstruction
Pancreatitis, Acute
Boerhaave Syndrome
Pneumonia, Bacterial
Cholangitis
Pneumothorax
Cholecystitis
Porphyria, Acute Intermittent
Choledocholithiasis
Pyelonephritis, Acute
Cholelithiasis
Sepsis, Bacterial
Colonic Obstruction
Septic Shock
Diverticulitis
Testicular Torsion
Ectopic Pregnancy

Other Problems to Be Considered

Ovarian torsion
Small bowel obstruction
Volvulus of midgut
Splenic vein thrombosis

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • In general, laboratory studies are not helpful in diagnosing AMI. No serum marker is sensitive or specific enough to establish or exclude the diagnosis of AMI. Waiting for laboratory results should not delay radiographic studies if serious suspicion of AMI exists.
  • CBC may be within the reference range initially, but the WBC count eventually rises as the disease progresses. Leukocytosis and/or leftward shift are observed in over 50% of cases. The hematocrit is elevated initially from hemoconcentration due to third spacing, but it decreases with GI bleeding.
  • Amylase levels are moderately elevated in over 50% of patients, but this finding is nonspecific.
  • Phosphate levels were initially thought to be sensitive, but later studies showed a sensitivity of only 25-33%.
  • ABG: Metabolic acidosis is observed late in disease course, but this is a nonspecific finding.
  • Lactate is elevated late in the clinical course. Levels that are persistently within the reference range strongly indicate a diagnosis other than AMI (sensitivity 96%, specificity 60%).
  • D-dimer has been suggested to possibly be helpful based on one small clinical study reported in 2001 and on one experimental study in rats.6 Clinical experience is lacking to validate the role of D-dimer in the screening and diagnosis of AMI.

Imaging Studies

  • Plain abdominal films  
    • Findings on plain films of the abdomen often are normal in the presence of AMI. However, plain films are warranted to exclude identifiable causes of abdominal pain, such as perforated viscus with free intraperitoneal air.
    • Positive findings are usually late and nonspecific and include ileus, small bowel obstruction, edematous/thickened bowel walls, and paucity of gas in the intestines. More specific signs, such as pneumatosis intestinalis, that is, submucosal gas (see Media file 1); thumbprinting of the bowel wall; and portal vein gas, are late findings. In one study of 23 cases of bowel infarction, 30% of the patients demonstrated focally edematous bowel wall (thumbprinting) and/or pneumatosis intestinalis.
  • Computed tomography scan
    • CT scan helps exclude other causes of abdominal pain.
    • CT angiography has a sensitivity of 71-96% and a specificity of 92-94% for AMI. In clinical practice, CT angiography is ordered much more frequently than classic angiography. CT angiography is noninvasive, readily available, and the preferred modality for MVT (90% sensitivity).
    • CT scan may show pneumatosis intestinalis, portal vein gas, bowel wall and/or mesenteric edema, abnormal gas patterns, thumbprinting, streaking of mesentery, and solid organ infarction. Bowel wall edema is the most common finding on CT scan. It represents submucosal infiltration of fluid or hemorrhage into ischemic bowel. Arterial occlusion may show nonenhancement of the vessels. MVT usually shows a thrombus in the SMV or portal vein.
    • Serial CT angiograms can be used to monitor patients treated nonsurgically with anticoagulation.
  • Angiography
    • Angiography has been the criterion standard to aid in diagnosis and presurgical planning. It also plays an important role in pharmacologic infusion therapy. However, angiography is less and less resorted to in clinical practice. Sensitivity is reported to be 88% for AMI.
    • An embolus appears as a sharp cutoff of flow near the origin of the middle colic artery. Thrombus appears as a more tapered occlusion near the origin of the SMA. NOMI is characterized by narrowing of the origins of multiple SMA branches, alternating dilation and narrowing of the intestinal branches (ie, "string of sausages" sign), spasm of the mesenteric arcades, and impaired filling of the intramural vessels.
    • Angiography is actually a second-line study in patients with a strong suspicion of MVT because false-negative findings are common. Findings with MVT include thrombus in the SMV, reflux of contrast into the aorta, prolonged arterial phase with accumulation of contrast and thickened bowel walls, extravasation of contrast into bowel lumen, and filling defect in the portal vein or complete lack of venous phase.
  • Ultrasonography
    • Duplex sonography studies are highly specific (92-100%) but not as sensitive (70-89%) compared to angiography. The examination cannot detect clots beyond the proximal main vessels nor can it be used to diagnose NOMI. Ultrasound is considered a second-line study for AMI. It is often less useful in the presence of dilated fluid-filled loops of bowel.
    • Some studies show usefulness similar to CT scanning if duplex scanning is performed for MVT. It may show a thrombus or absent flow in the involved arteries or veins. Other possible findings include portal vein gas, biliary disease, free peritoneal fluid, thickened bowel wall, and intramural gas.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography
    • MRI and MRA provide findings similar to CT scan in AMI. Sensitivity of MRA is 100% and specificity is 91%. MRA is particularly effective for evaluating MVT.
    • The main drawbacks are the expense and the time required. In the future, rapid MRA may supplant angiography.
  • Echocardiography findings may confirm the source of embolization or show valvular pathology.

Other Tests

  • Intraoperative fluorescein administration: During laparotomy, 1 g of fluorescein is infused. Viable bowel fluoresces brightly under a Wood lamp. This allows the surgeon to better evaluate the segments that need resection. It may be performed at the primary operation or during a 24-hour second-look operation.
  • ECG may show myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation.

Procedures

  • Nasogastric tube decompression helps relieve distension and allows evaluation for upper GI bleeding.
  • Diagnostic peritoneal lavage may recover the serosanguineous fluid associated with bowel infarction; this is not a preferred study if AMI is suspected.
  • Foley catheterization allows for monitoring of urinary output as an indicator for minimal fluid resuscitation.
  • In patients with intestinal angina, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of the celiac and/or mesenteric arteries have been reported with variable short- and long-term patency rates. A multi-institutional, randomized, controlled clinical trial is needed to define the optimal conditions for their application.

More on Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

Overview: Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Treatment & Medication: Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Follow-up: Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
Multimedia: Acute Mesenteric Ischemia
References

References

  1. Cokkinis AJ. Observations on the mesenteric circulation. J Anat. Jan 1930;64:200-205. [Medline].

  2. Leung DA, Schneider E, Kubik-Huch R, Marincek B, Pfammatter T. Acute mesenteric ischemia caused by spontaneous isolated dissection of the superior mesenteric artery: treatment by percutaneous stent placement. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(12):1916-9. [Medline].

  3. Miyamoto N, Sakurai Y, Hirokami M, Takahashi K, Nishimori H, Tsuji K, et al. Endovascular stent placement for isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery: report of a case. Radiat Med. Nov 2005;23(7):520-4. [Medline].

  4. Ko GJ, Han KJ, Han SG, Hwang SY, Choi CH, Gham CW, et al. [A case of spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery treated by percutaneous stent placement]. Korean J Gastroenterol. Feb 2006;47(2):168-72. [Medline].

  5. Casella IB, Bosch MA, Sousa WO Jr. Isolated spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery treated by percutaneous stent placement: case report. J Vasc Surg. Jan 2008;47(1):197-200. [Medline].

  6. Acosta S, Nilsson TK, Bjorck M. Preliminary study of D-dimer as a possible marker of acute bowel ischaemia. Br J Surg. Mar 2001;88(3):385-8. [Medline].

  7. Herbert GS, Steele SR. Acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am. Oct 2007;87(5):1115-34, ix. [Medline].

  8. Altinyollar H, Boyabatli M, Berberoglu U. D-dimer as a marker for early diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Thromb Res. 2006;117(4):463-7. [Medline].

  9. Bassiouny HS. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):319-26. [Medline].

  10. Boley SJ, Brandt LJ, Sammartano RJ. History of mesenteric ischemia. The evolution of a diagnosis and management. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):275-88. [Medline].

  11. Brandt LJ, Boley SJ. AGA technical review on intestinal ischemia. American Gastrointestinal Association. Gastroenterology. May 2000;118(5):954-68. [Medline].

  12. Fink S, Chaudhuri TK, Davis HH. Acute mesenteric ischemia and malpractice claims. South Med J. Feb 2000;93(2):210-4. [Medline].

  13. Hansen KJ, Deitch JS. Transaortic mesenteric endarterectomy. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):397-407. [Medline].

  14. Hassan HA, Raufman JP. Mesenteric venous thrombosis. South Med J. Jun 1999;92(6):558-62. [Medline].

  15. Hladík P, Raupach J, Lojík M, Krajina A, Voboril Z, Jon B, et al. Treatment of acute mesenteric thrombosis/ischemia by transcatheter thromboaspiration. Surgery. Jan 2005;137(1):122-3. [Medline].

  16. Kirkpatrick ID, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM. Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology. Oct 2003;229(1):91-8. [Medline].

  17. Klempnauer J, Grothues F, Bektas H, Pichlmayr R. Long-term results after surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia. Surgery. Mar 1997;121(3):239-43. [Medline].

  18. Kozuch PL, Brandt LJ. Review article: diagnosis and management of mesenteric ischaemia with an emphasis on pharmacotherapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Feb 1 2005;21(3):201-15. [Medline].

  19. Kumar S, Sarr MG, Kamath PS. Mesenteric venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med. Dec 6 2001;345(23):1683-8. [Medline].

  20. Mansour MA. Management of acute mesenteric ischemia. Arch Surg. Mar 1999;134(3):328-30; discussion 331. [Medline].

  21. McKinsey JF, Gewertz BL. Acute mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):307-18. [Medline].

  22. Mohammed A, Teo NB, Pickford IR, Moss JG. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of coeliac artery stenosis in the treatment of mesenteric angina: a case report and review of therapeutic options. J R Coll Surg Edinb. Dec 2000;45(6):403-7. [Medline][Full Text].

  23. Nicoloff AD, Williamson WK, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Porter JM. Duplex ultrasonography in evaluation of splanchnic artery stenosis. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):339-55. [Medline].

  24. Rhee RY, Gloviczki P. Mesenteric venous thrombosis. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):327-38. [Medline].

  25. Rosenblum JD, Boyle CM, Schwartz LB. The mesenteric circulation. Anatomy and physiology. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 1997;77(2):289-306. [Medline].

  26. Ruotolo RA, Evans SR. Mesenteric ischemia in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. Aug 1999;15(3):527-57. [Medline].

  27. Sanabria JR, Hiruki T, Szalay DA, Tandan V, Gallinger S. Superior mesenteric vein thrombosis after the Whipple procedure: an aggressive, combined treatment approach. Can J Surg. Dec 1997;40(6):467-70. [Medline].

  28. Yamaguchi T, Saeki M, Iwasaki Y, Ishikawa M, Hayakawa M, Sakuyama K, et al. Local thrombolytic therapy for superior mesenteric artery embolism: complications and long-term clinical follow-up. Radiat Med. Jan-Feb 1999;17(1):27-33. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

acute mesenteric ischemia, mesenteric vascular occlusion, occlusive mesenteric arterial ischemia, acute mesenteric arterial embolus, acute mesenteric arterial thrombosis, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, acute mesenteric venous thrombosis, acute mesenteric infarction, acute mesenteric occlusive disease, AMI, NOMI, OMAI, AMAE, AMAT, MVT

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Chat V Dang, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine, Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science; Clinical Professor, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles
Chat V Dang, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Wound Management and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jeff Wade, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Long Beach Community Hospital, Greater El Monte Medical Center
Jeff Wade, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine and American College of Emergency Physicians
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ashis Mandal, MD, Professor, Department of Surgery, Drew University of Medicine and Science and UCLA College of Medicine
Ashis Mandal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Burt Cagir, MD, FACS, Assistant Professor of Surgery, State University of New York, Upstate Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Director of Surgical Research, Robert Packer Hospital; Associate Program Director, Department of Surgery, Guthrie Clinic
Burt Cagir, MD, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, and Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

David L Morris, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Surgery, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Australia
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Paolo Zamboni, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief of Day Surgery Unit, Chair of Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy
Paolo Zamboni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Venous Forum and New York Academy of Sciences
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA, Vice Chairman, Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital
John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
Disclosure: AMGEN Royalty Other; AstraZeneca Grant/research funds Other

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.