Bile Duct Tumors Treatment & Management

  • Author: Todd A Nickloes, DO, FACOS; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA   more...
 
Updated: Oct 7, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

Medical therapy is indicated for patients who are unfit for surgery or who have an unresectable tumor. Jaundice and itching can be reduced with the placement of an endoprosthesis, either endoscopically or percutaneously, across strictures.

Endoscopic techniques for the relief of obstruction include sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation of the stricture, and the placement of stents.[11] Larger, expandable metal stents, which have better patency rates than do plastic stents, include Metal-Palmaz, Strecker, Gianturco Z stent, and Wall stents.[15] One meta-analysis suggests that covered self-expandable metal stents have a trend toward later obstruction compared with uncovered self-expandable metal stents.[16]

Percutaneous, transhepatic endoprosthetic insertion also is successful, but an increased risk of complications, such as blood and bile leakage, exists. Ninety percent of stents can be placed by a combination of endoscopic and percutaneous techniques after a failed endoscopic attempt.

Chemotherapy has been tried in these patients but has not been proven to be of definite benefit.[17]

Radiotherapy may be administered by external beam therapy; intraoperative radiotherapy using biliary stents with iridium (192 Ir), radium, or cobalt (60 Co); radioimmunotherapy using sodium iodide (131 I) anti-CEA as a component of therapy; or charged particle irradiation. Internal radiotherapy may be combined with biliary drainage, but the value is unproven.[18, 19]

Pain may be relieved with the injection of 50% alcohol for chemical splanchnicectomy.

Next

Surgical Therapy

Resection is the best treatment for bile duct tumors and provides the best palliation in terms of duration and freedom from infectious complications.[20, 21] Benefits of resection include the possibility of cure or long-term survival, especially for patients with distal tumors. The type of surgical procedure performed depends on the site and extent of the disease.

Proximal tumors (Klatskin tumors) may be managed by a variety of techniques, including the following:

  • Patients with perihilar tumors (Bismuth classification I and II), without evidence of vascular invasion, are candidates for local excision. If achieving negative margins are not possible with local excision, resection of the corresponding lobe is indicated.
  • Type III tumors are managed best by right or left hepatic lobectomy. Resection of the adjacent caudate lobe (segment I) may ensure adequate tumor-free margins in cases of involvement of the hepatic duct bifurcation.
  • Sometimes, extended right or left hepatectomy and (rarely) central liver resection may need to be combined for adequate resection of the tumor.

Following resection of the bile duct, which may be combined with hepatic resection, reconstruction can be performed by unilateral or bilateral hepaticojejunostomy, using transhepatic stents.[15]

Surgical exploration is indicated in patients who are fit for surgery when preoperative evidence of metastases is absent or when locally unresectable disease exists. If metastases are detected at the time of surgical exploration, bilateral stents that may have been placed preoperatively are left in situ, and cholecystectomy is performed to prevent the subsequent development of acute cholecystitis. Locally advanced and unresectable perihilar tumors also can be managed by Roux-en-Y cholecysto(docho)jejunostomy with intraoperative placement of silastic biliary catheters or a segment III or V cholangiojejunostomy.

Mid-duct tumors can be managed using bile duct resection and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Distal tumors may be amenable to Whipple resection (radical pancreaticoduodenectomy) (see image below) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Unresectable tumors may be managed by cholecystectomy, a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, or choledochojejunostomy proximal to the tumor, and additional gastrojejunostomy and chemical sympathectomy are considered.

Reconstruction after classic radical pancreaticoduReconstruction after classic radical pancreaticoduodenectomy requires 3 anastomoses: pancreaticojejunostomy, choledochojejunostomy, and gastrojejunostomy. Illustration used with permission from Carol EH Scott-Conner, MD, PhD (ed), Chassin's Operative Strategy in General Surgery, Springer-Verlag, 2002.

Reconstruction involves anastomosis of bile ducts to a loop of jejunum (see image below).

Cholangiogram showing completed choledochojejunostCholangiogram showing completed choledochojejunostomy with widely patent anastomosis.

Palliation

Surgical bypass is indicated in patients in whom placing a stent by either endoscopic or percutaneous techniques is impossible and in patients who are found to have unresectable disease or metastases at exploration.[11]

Bypass may be performed by either a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with intraoperative placement of a silastic transhepatic stent or a segment III bypass to the left intrahepatic ducts. In patients with distal bile duct tumors, the operation of choice is biliary enteric bypass using the upper end of the extrahepatic bile duct or gallbladder. Consider prophylactic gastrojejunostomy in these patients, because some of these individuals may develop gastroduodenal obstruction prior to death. Bypass is less commonly required, because stents have improved, and even duodenal obstruction can now be effectively palliated.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Staging of the disease is determined by evaluating findings of CT scanning and MRI.[6, 7]

Delineation of the tumor and its extent may be assessed by cholangiography (endoscopic and transhepatic) and magnetic resonance cholangiography.[9]

Vascular involvement can be identified and assessed by CT scan, MRI, and angiography, as previously described (see Imaging Studies).

Patient risk for surgery and anesthesia is determined, and cardiac and pulmonary assessment is performed.

If the clinical condition of the patient does not rule out surgical intervention, the resectability and extent of tumor involvement are assessed, and metastases are sought. Low and mid – bile duct tumors usually are resectable if angiography and venography exclude vascular invasion. Cancer of the hilar region tends to be less amenable to resection.

At surgery, further assessment is performed with intraoperative ultrasonographic scanning and a search for lymph node involvement.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Laparoscopy in patients with bile duct tumors can be useful in the identification of metastases and peritoneal disease and, hence, may assist in assessing resectability.

Intraoperative ultrasonography also is useful and may be combined with laparoscopy.

Exploratory laparotomy is performed in patients who are fit for surgery and who are without any definite evidence of metastases or unresectability on preoperative investigation. One half of these patients are found to have evidence of intraperitoneal dissemination of the tumor or extensive involvement of the porta hepatis; therefore, they are candidates for minimal intervention, including bypass.

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

These patients are at risk for the development of general complications, including pneumonia, deep venous thrombosis, and infection. Routine perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and coagulopathy are administered. Active physiotherapy, breathing exercises, and early ambulation are encouraged.

Complications specific to the procedure performed include anastomotic leak and bile leakage. Stents may be placed across anastomoses and removed after cholangiography confirms the absence or healing of leak.[15]

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Patients who have evidence of positive tumor margins after resection or who develop recurrence may be candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy.[18, 19] This usually takes the form of extracorporeal therapy for positive surgical margins and intraluminal radiotherapy for positive duct margins. Chemotherapy has not been shown to be of benefit.[17]

Previous
Next

Complications

Postoperative complications may be general or local. General complications include the following:

  • Myocardial infarction (MI)
  • Pneumonia
  • Surgical site infection
  • Deep venous thrombosis
  • Pulmonary embolism (PE)

Technical complications related to the procedure performed include the following:

  • Bile leak
  • Stricture
  • Postoperative hemorrhage
  • Pancreatic fistula – May occur after radical pancreaticoduodenectomy

Complications arising from the placement of stents include the following:

  • Early - Cholangitis (7%) and perforation
  • Late - Blockage and migration of stent
Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

In patients with bile duct tumors, the choice of treatment and the prognosis are influenced greatly by the location of the tumor. Prognosis is better for distal bile duct tumors, histologically differentiated, and polypoidal tumors. Factors that suggest poor prognosis include involvement of lymph nodes, vascular invasion, advanced T stage, positive tumor margins of the resected specimen, and the presence of mutations of P53 gene.[5]

With hilar cholangiocarcinoma, the overall resection rate in most series varies form 40-60%. The mean survival rate for patients undergoing curative resection is 67-80% at 1 year and 11-21% at 5 years. Local resection has a lower operative mortality rate (8%) than does major hepatic resection (15%), with a mean survival of 21 months compared with 24 months for major hepatic resection. No clear indication exists that survival is improved significantly by major hepatic resection when compared with local bile duct resection, though some studies suggest that hepatic resection is associated with a greater incidence of tumor-free margins and, consequently, survival.

In distal bile duct cancers, the resection rate is more than 60%, and the prognosis is better than for hilar tumors, the mean survival being 39 months. The survival rate varies from 50-70% at 1 year to 17-39% at 3 years.

Diffuse intrahepatic tumors have a dismal prognosis; most patients with these tumors die within 1 year of diagnosis.

If left untreated, 50% of patients with bile duct cancer may survive for 1 year, 20% may survive for 2 years, and 10% may survive for 3 years.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

The role of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is controversial.[17, 18, 19] The use of hormones in treatment, including somatostatin analogs, cholecystokinin, and cholecystokinin antagonists, is being investigated.

It has been suggested that preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary drainage in patients with tumors of the bile duct increases the risk of implantation metastases after resection of the tumor.[22] Therefore, preoperative radiotherapy is advocated in such patients, but the benefit has not been definitely proven.[23]

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), infusion of 5-fluorouracil into the hepatic artery or bile ducts, and percutaneous injection of ethanol (PEI) into the lesions are other modalities that are investigational.

Photodynamic therapy may be useful in relieving obstruction, especially when obstruction occurs as a result of tumor outgrowth into an endoprosthesis.[24]

Liver transplantation, when performed for cholangiocarcinoma, is associated with poor survival.[25]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Todd A Nickloes, DO, FACOS  Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville

Todd A Nickloes, DO, FACOS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Osteopathic Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, Association for Academic Surgery, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Southeastern Surgical Congress, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Brian Reed, MD  Staff Physician, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Brian Reed, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

LaMar O Mack, MD  Resident Physician, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center

LaMar O Mack, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association, National Medical Association, and Student National Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Ravi Pokala Kiran, MBBS, MS, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Glas)  Staff Physician, Department of General Surgery, St Mary's Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Naveen Pokala, MBBS, MS, FRCS  Staff Physician, Department of Surgery, Bronx Lebanon Hospital

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS  Professor, Chair, Department of Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Development in Research, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Gastroenterological Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Michael A Grosso, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Francis Hospital

Michael A Grosso, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society of University Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Paolo Zamboni, MD  Professor of Surgery, Chief of Day Surgery Unit, Chair of Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy

Paolo Zamboni, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Venous Forum and New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA  Vice Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director, Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, and Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: AMGEN Royalty Consulting; ARdelyx Ownership interest Board membership

Additional Contributors

The editors wish to thank Carol E H Scott-Conner, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine, for her previous contributions to this article.

The editors also wish to thank Richard E Glass, MBBS, MS, FRCS, Consultant General and Gastrointestinal Surgeon, Department of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Princess Margaret Hospital, UK, for his previous contributions to this article.

References
  1. Smits NJ, Reeders JW. Imaging and staging of biliopancreatic malignancy: role of ultrasound. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:20-4. [Medline].

  2. Elfaki DH, Gossard AA, Lindor KD. Cholangiocarcinoma: expanding the spectrum of risk factors. J Gastrointest Cancer. Jan 14 2009;[Medline].

  3. Chapman RW. Risk factors for biliary tract carcinogenesis. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:308-11. [Medline].

  4. Saurin JC, Joly-Pharaboz MO, Pernas P, Henry L, Ponchon T, Madjar JJ. Detection of Ki-ras gene point mutations in bile specimens for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign biliary strictures. Gut. Sep 2000;47(3):357-61. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  5. Rijken AM, Offerhaus GJ, Polak MM. p53 expression as a prognostic determinant in resected distal bile duct carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. Jun 1999;25(3):297-301. [Medline].

  6. Freeny PC. Computed tomography in the diagnosis and staging of cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:12-7. [Medline].

  7. Tani K, Kubota Y, Yamaguchi T. MR imaging of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Nov-Dec 1991;15(6):975-8. [Medline].

  8. Kim HJ, Lee JM, Kim SH, et al. Evaluation of the longitudinal tumor extent of bile duct cancer: value of adding gadolinium-enhanced dynamic imaging to unenhanced images and magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 2007;31(3):469-74. [Medline].

  9. Hanninen EL, Pech M, Jonas S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging including magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for tumor localization and therapy planning in malignant hilar obstructions. Acta Radiol. Aug 2005;46(5):462-70. [Medline].

  10. Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Tsuchiya S, et al. Clinical utility of peroral cholangioscopy for mucin-producing bile duct tumor. Hepatogastroenterology. Sep-Oct 2008;55(86-87):1509-12. [Medline].

  11. Rumalla A, Baron TH. Evaluation and endoscopic palliation of cholangiocarcinoma. Management of cholangiocarcinoma. Dig Dis. 1999;17(4):194-200. [Medline].

  12. Desa LA, Akosa AB, Lazzara S, Domizio P, Krausz T, Benjamin IS. Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture. Gut. Oct 1991;32(10):1188-91. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  13. Furmanczyk PS, Grieco VS, Agoff SN. Biliary brush cytology and the detection of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation of specific cytomorphologic features and CA19-9 levels. Am J Clin Pathol. Sep 2005;124(3):355-60. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  14. Lamerz R. Role of tumour markers, cytogenetics. Ann Oncol. 1999;10 Suppl 4:145-9. [Medline].

  15. Kawamoto H, Ishida E, Okamoto Y, et al. Evaluation of covered metallic stents in malignant biliary stenosis--prominent effectiveness in gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. Sep-Oct 2005;52(65):1351-6. [Medline].

  16. Saleem A, Leggett CL, Murad MH, Baron TH. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the patency of covered and uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of distal malignant bile duct obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. Aug 2011;74(2):321-327.e1-3. [Medline].

  17. Todoroki T. Chemotherapy for bile duct carcinoma in the light of adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. May-Jun 2000;47(33):644-9. [Medline].

  18. Oh D, Lim do H, Heo JS, et al. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in microscopic tumor control after extrahepatic bile duct cancer surgery. Am J Clin Oncol. Feb 2007;30(1):21-5. [Medline].

  19. Pitt HA, Nakeeb A, Abrams RA, Coleman J, Piantadosi S, Yeo CJ, et al. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival. Ann Surg. Jun 1995;221(6):788-97; discussion 797-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  20. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M. Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg. Nov 1999;230(5):663-71. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  21. Havlik R, Sbisa E, Tullo A. Results of resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with analysis of prognostic factors. Hepatogastroenterology. Jul-Aug 2000;47(34):927-31. [Medline].

  22. Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Vigano L, et al. Preoperative biliary drainage increases infectious complications after hepatectomy for proximal bile duct tumor obstruction. World J Surg. Feb 2009;33(2):318-25. [Medline].

  23. Gerhards MF, Gonzalez DG, ten Hoopen-Neumann H. Prevention of implantation metastases after resection of proximal bile duct tumours with pre-operative low dose radiation therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. Aug 2000;26(5):480-5. [Medline].

  24. Ortner MA. Photodynamic therapy of cholangiocarcinoma cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. Jul 2000;10(3):481-6. [Medline].

  25. Jeyarajah DR, Klintmalm GB. Is liver transplantation indicated for cholangiocarcinoma?. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1998;5(1):48-51. [Medline].

  26. Burke EC, Jarnagin WR, Hochwald SN, Pisters PW, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system. Ann Surg. Sep 1998;228(3):385-94. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  27. Chamberlain RS, Blumgart LH. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a review and commentary. Ann Surg Oncol. Jan-Feb 2000;7(1):55-66. [Medline].

  28. Chan C, Medina-Franco H, Bell W. Carcinoid tumor of the hepatic duct presenting as a Klatskin tumor in an adolescent and review of world literature. Hepatogastroenterology. Mar-Apr 2000;47(32):519-21. [Medline].

  29. Chen MF. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma (cholangiocellular carcinoma): clinical features, diagnosis and treatment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Dec 1999;14(12):1144-9. [Medline].

  30. Fan ZM, Yamashita Y, Harada M. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1993;161(2):313-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  31. Hanack U, Lorf T, Binder L. Surgical treatment of cholangiocellular carcinoma. Swiss Surg. 1999;5(3):111-5. [Medline].

  32. Jarnagin WR. Cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Semin Surg Oncol. Sep-Oct 2000;19(2):156-76. [Medline].

  33. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. Oct 8 2005;366(9493):1303-14. [Medline].

  34. Kimura Y, Nishikawa N, Okita K, et al. Biliary tract malignancy and chronic inflammation from the perspective of pancreaticobiliary maljunction. Oncology. 2005;69 Suppl 1:41-5. [Medline].

  35. Lee SG, Lee YJ, Park KM. One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):135-41. [Medline].

  36. Marcos-Alvarez A, Jenkins RL. Cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. Apr 1996;5(2):301-16. [Medline].

  37. Martin RF, Rossi RL. Multidisciplinary considerations for patients with cancer of the pancreas or biliary tract. Surg Clin North Am. Apr 2000;80(2):709-28. [Medline].

  38. Neuhaus P, Jonas S. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma--the German experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):142-7. [Medline].

  39. Schmassmann A. Nonsurgical therapies for hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Swiss Surg. 1999;5(3):116-21. [Medline].

  40. Shuangshoti S Jr, Shuangshoti S. Primary mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the intrahepatic bile duct: a case report with review of literature. J Med Assoc Thai. Feb 2000;83(2):197-203. [Medline].

  41. Zervos EE, Osborne D, Goldin SB, et al. Stage does not predict survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinomas promoting an aggressive operative approach. Am J Surg. Nov 2005;190(5):810-5.

Previous
Next
 
Operative photograph of choledochojejunostomy, showing ample size of common duct.
Distal common bile duct tumor excised by radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. The tumor measured 1.2 cm in diameter.
Reconstruction after classic radical pancreaticoduodenectomy requires 3 anastomoses: pancreaticojejunostomy, choledochojejunostomy, and gastrojejunostomy. Illustration used with permission from Carol EH Scott-Conner, MD, PhD (ed), Chassin's Operative Strategy in General Surgery, Springer-Verlag, 2002.
Cholangiogram showing completed choledochojejunostomy with widely patent anastomosis.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) shows a narrowed area in the distal common bile duct with dilatation of the proximal biliary tree.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.