Pressure Ulcers and Wound Care
- Author: Christian N Kirman, MD; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA more...
Although the terms decubitus ulcer, pressure sore, and pressure ulcer often are used interchangeably, pressure ulcer is the best term to use. The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) defines a pressure ulcer as an area of unrelieved pressure over a defined area, usually over a bony prominence, resulting in ischemia, cell death, and tissue necrosis. See the image below.
Signs and symptoms
The following important information should be obtained from the history:
Overall physical and mental health, including life expectancy
Previous hospitalizations, operations, or ulcerations
Diet and recent weight changes
Bowel habits and continence status
Presence of spasticity or flexion contractures
Medications and allergies to medications
Tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drug use
Place of residence and the support surface used in bed or while sitting
level of independence, mobility, and ability to comprehend and cooperate with care
Underlying social and financial support structure
Presence of specific cultural, religious, or ethnic issues
Presence of advanced directives, power of attorney, or specific preferences regarding care
Information related to the current ulceration - Pain, foul odor or discharge, natural history of the present ulcer, and associated medical cause of the ulcer
A thorough physical examination is necessary to evaluate the patient’s overall state of health, comorbidities, nutritional status, and mental status. After the general physical examination, attention should be turned to the wound.
For the purposes of workup and treatment, it is helpful to stage the pressure ulcer according to the system promulgated by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), as follows:
(Suspected) deep tissue injury - A purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure or shear
Stage I - Intact skin with signs of impending ulceration, initially presenting blanchable erythema indicating reactive hyperemia
Stage II - A partial-thickness loss of skin involving epidermis and dermis
Stage III - A full-thickness loss of skin with extension into subcutaneous tissue but not through the underlying fascia
Stage IV - A full-thickness tissue loss with extension into muscle, bone, tendon, or joint capsule
Unstageable - A full-thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough or eschar to such an extent that the full depth of the wound cannot be appreciated
Complications of ulceration include the following:
See Presentation for more detail.
Laboratory studies that may be helpful include the following:
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
Albumin and prealbumin
When indicated by the specific clinical situation, the following should be obtained:
Urinalysis and culture in the presence of urinary incontinence
Stool examination for fecal WBCs and Clostridium difficile toxin when pseudomembranous colitis may be the cause of fecal incontinence
Blood cultures if bacteremia or sepsis is suggested
Additional studies that may be considered include the following:
Magnetic resonance imaging
Tissue or bone biopsy
See Workup for more detail.
General principles of wound assessment and treatment are as follows:
Wound care may be broadly divided into nonoperative and operative methods
For stage I and II pressure ulcers, wound care is usually conservative (ie, nonoperative)
For stage III and IV lesions, surgical intervention (eg, flap reconstruction) may be required, though some of these lesions must be treated conservatively because of coexisting medical problems 
Approximately 70%-90% of pressure ulcers are superficial and heal by second intention
Successful medical management of pressure ulcers relies on the following key principles:
Reduction of pressure
Adequate débridement of necrotic and devitalized tissue
Control of infection
Meticulous wound care
If surgical reconstruction of a pressure ulcer is indicated, medical status must be optimized before reconstruction is attempted. General measures for optimizing medical status include the following:
Control of spasticity
Nutritional support as appropriate
Cessation of smoking
Adequate pain control
Maintenance of adequate blood volume
Correction of anemia
Maintenance of the cleanliness of the wound and surrounding intact skin
Management of urinary or fecal incontinence as appropriate
Management of bacterial contamination or infection
Additional nonsurgical treatment measures include the following:
Pressure reduction - Repositioning and use of support surfaces
Wound management - Débridement, cleansing agents, dressings, and antimicrobials
Newer approaches still being studied - Growth factors (eg, becaplermin), negative-pressure wound therapy, and electrotherapy
Surgical interventions that may be warranted include the following:
Diversion of the urinary or fecal stream
Release of flexion contractures
Options available for surgical management of pressure ulcers are as follows:
Direct closure (rarely usable for pressure ulcers being considered for surgical treatment)
Myocutaneous (musculocutaneous) flaps
The choice of reconstruction approach depends on the location of the pressure ulcer (eg, ischial, sacral, or trochanteric).
Prevention, if achievable, is optimal. Prevention of pressure ulcers has 2 main components:
Identification of patients at risk
Interventions designed to reduce the risk
The terms decubitus ulcer (from Latin decumbere, “to lie down”), pressure sore, and pressure ulcer often are used interchangeably in the medical community. However, as the name suggests, decubitus ulcer occurs at sites overlying bony structures that are prominent when a person is recumbent. Hence, it is not an accurate term for ulcers occurring in other positions, such as prolonged sitting (eg, ischial tuberosity ulcer). Because the common denominator of all such ulcerations is pressure, pressure ulcer is the best term to use.
The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) is an independent nonprofit organization formed in 1987 and dedicated to the prevention, management, treatment, and research of pressure ulcers. The NPUAP defines a pressure ulcer as an area of unrelieved pressure over a defined area, usually over a bony prominence, resulting in ischemia, cell death, and tissue necrosis.
Pressure is exerted on the skin, soft tissue, muscle, and bone by the weight of an individual against a surface beneath. These pressures often exceed capillary filling pressure (~32 mm Hg). In patients with normal sensitivity, mobility, and mental faculty, pressure ulcers do not occur. Feedback, conscious and unconscious, from the areas of compression leads them to change their body position, and these changes shift the pressure before any irreversible tissue damage develops. (See Pathophysiology and Etiology.)
Those who cannot avoid long-term uninterrupted pressure over bony prominences (eg, persons who are elderly, have neurologic impairment, or are undergoing acute hospitalization ) are at increased risk for pressure ulcers. They cannot protect themselves from the pressure unless they consciously change position or are helped to do so. Even a highly conscientious patient with an extensive support group and unlimited financial resources may develop ulceration resulting from a brief lapse in avoidance of the ill effects of pressure.[4, 5]
Addressing the overall management of pressure ulcers is now a prominent national healthcare issue. Despite current interest and advances in medicine, surgery, nursing care, and self-care education, pressure ulcers remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and patients with pressure ulcers are important users of medical resources.[2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]
Many factors are involved in the management of pressure ulcers. Nursing plays a pivotal role in this challenging and complex process, using a multifaceted approach that includes skin care, pressure relief, and nutritional support. Prevention is the key to managing pressure ulcers, and it begins with a complete medical and nursing history, a risk assessment, and skin examination when the patient is admitted.[7, 8, 13] (See Treatment.)
Factors that subject the tissue at risk to potential skin breakdown should receive particular attention. Patients should be kept clean and dry and should be repositioned frequently. For patients at risk, adequate pressure relief must be provided, along with adequate nutritional support.
For patients who develop pressure ulcers, these preventive measures must be used in conjunction with the techniques of general wound care. Nonoperative wound care may involve simple topical therapy, as for pressure ulcers with unbroken skin or superficial lesions with nondraining, noninfected granulation tissue. For draining necrotic or infected lesions, treatment also may include absorption agents, calcium alginate dressings, wound coverings, debridement, and antimicrobial therapy.
Other therapeutic modalities, such as whirlpool, physical therapy, and specialty beds, may also be added to the treatment regimen.
Research in the area of pressure ulcers—specifically, in the characterization, prevention, and treatment of these lesions—is important for preventing secondary complications in persons with disabilities. As the standards of acute, posttraumatic, and rehabilitation care improve, the population of persons with lifelong functional impairments continues to grow. Consequently, the prevention of secondary complications has become an increasingly prominent concern.
To date, clinical studies of pressure ulcers have been difficult to assess because they have often been qualitatively based on random observation and uncontrolled studies. To arrive at more reliable conclusions, more fundamental approaches to these ulcers must be considered. Questions that might be asked include the following:
What are the basic histologic, pathologic, and biochemical markers in an evolving pressure ulcer?
Is it ethical to take a biopsy specimen of a human pressure ulcer for purposes of research?
What are the multiple variables in the formation of pressure ulcers in the human environment?
A monograph prepared by the Research Committee of the NPUAP suggested the following research priorities with respect to pressure ulcers :
Intervention and product efficacy studies
Basic research related to staging of ulcers
Refinement of risk assessment methods
Risk-based, multi-interventional trials
Additional issues requiring investigation included cost issues, ethical decision making, guideline dissemination, public policy, and national outcome evaluations. Methodologic issues, such as research design, study population, and control group use, also were considered to warrant further investigation.
Pressure ulcers are typically described in terms of location and depth of involvement. The hip and buttock regions account for up to 70% of all pressure ulcers, with ischial tuberosity, trochanteric, and sacral locations being most common. The lower extremities account for an additional 15-25% of all pressure ulcers, with malleolar, heel, patellar, and pretibial locations being most common (see the images below).
The remaining small percentage of pressure ulcers may occur in any location that experiences long periods of uninterrupted pressure. The nose, chin, forehead, occiput, chest, back, and elbow are among the more common of the infrequent sites for pressure ulceration. No surface of the body can be considered immune to the effects of pressure.
Pressure ulcers can involve different levels of tissue. Muscle has been proved to be most susceptible to pressure. However, Daniel and Faibisoff found that muscle rarely was interposed between bone and skin in normal weight-bearing positions in cadaver and clinical dissections.
In 1873, Sir James Paget described the production of pressure ulcers remarkably well, and his description is still quite accurate today. Many factors contribute to the development of pressure ulcers, but pressure leading to ischemia and necrosis is the final common pathway.
In this view, pressure ulcers result from constant pressure sufficient to impair local blood flow to soft tissue for an extended period. This external pressure must be greater than the arterial capillary pressure (32 mm Hg) to impair inflow and greater than the venous capillary closing pressure (8-12 mm Hg) to impede the return of flow for an extended time.
Tissues are capable withstanding enormous pressures for brief periods, but prolonged exposure to pressures just slightly above capillary filling pressure initiates a downward spiral toward tissue necrosis and ulceration.[17, 18] The inciting event is compression of the tissues against an external object such as a mattress, wheelchair pad, bed rail, or other surface.
Lindan et al documented ranges of pressure applied to various anatomic points in certain positions. The points of highest pressure with the patient supine included the sacrum, heel, and occiput (40-60 mm Hg). With the patient prone, the chest and knees absorbed the highest pressure (50 mm Hg). When the patient is sitting, the ischial tuberosities were under the most pressure (100 mm Hg). Obviously, these pressures are greater than the end capillary pressure, which is why these are the areas where pressure ulcers are most common.
Shear forces and friction aggravate the effects of pressure and are important components of the mechanism of injury (see the image below). Maceration may occur in a patient who has incontinence, predisposing the skin to injury. Pressure, shear forces, and friction cause microcirculatory occlusion and consequent ischemia, which leads to inflammation and tissue anoxia. Tissue anoxia leads to cell death, necrosis, and ulceration.
Of the various tissues at risk for death due to pressure, muscle tissue is damaged first, before skin and subcutaneous tissue, probably because of its increased need for oxygen and higher metabolic requirements.[21, 22] Irreversible changes may occur during as little as 2 hours of uninterrupted pressure. Skin can withstand ischemia from direct pressure for up to 12 hours. By the time ulceration is present through the skin level, significant damage of underlying muscle may already have occurred, making the overall shape of the ulcer an inverted cone.
Reperfusion has been suggested as a cause of additional damage to the ulcerated area, inducing an ulcer to enlarge or become more chronic—as, for example, when a paraplegic or quadriplegic patient is turned from one side to the other in an attempt to combat prolonged pressure on a given side. The exact mechanism of ischemia-reperfusion injury is yet to be fully understood. Continued production of inflammatory mediators and reactive oxygen species during ischemia-reperfusion may contribute to the chronicity of pressure ulcers.
Impaired mobility is probably the most common reason why patients are exposed to the prolonged uninterrupted pressure that causes pressure ulcers. This situation may be present in patients who are neurologically impaired, heavily sedated or anesthetized, restrained, demented, or recovering from a traumatic injury. These patients cannot alter their position far enough or often enough to relieve the pressure. Prolonged immobility may lead to muscle and soft tissue atrophy, decreasing the bulk over which bony prominences are supported.
Contractures and spasticity often contribute to ulcer formation by repeatedly exposing tissues to trauma through flexion of a joint. Contractures rigidly hold a joint in flexion, whereas spasticity subjects tissues to repeated friction and shear forces. Skin breakdown and pressure ulcers may frequently be found under and between toes and on the palm of the hand.
Inability to perceive pain, whether from neurologic impairment or from medication, contributes to pressure ulceration by removing one of the most important stimuli for repositioning and pressure relief. Conversely, pain from surgical incisions, fracture sites, or other sources may make the patient unwilling or unable to change position.
The quality of the skin also influences whether pressure leads to ulceration. Paralysis, insensibility, and aging lead to atrophy of the skin with thinning of this protective barrier. A decrease in epidermal turnover, a flattening of the dermal-epidermal junction, and a loss of vascularity occur with advanced age.
In addition, the skin becomes more susceptible to minor traumatic forces, such as the friction and shear forces typically exerted during the moving of a patient. Trauma that causes de-epithelialization or skin tears removes the barrier to bacterial contamination and leads to transdermal water loss, creating maceration and causing the skin to adhere to clothing and bedding.
Incontinence or the presence of a fistula contributes to ulceration in several ways. These conditions cause the skin to be continually moist, thus leading to maceration. In addition, frequent soiling has the effect of regularly introducing bacteria into an open wound.
Bacterial contamination, though not truly an etiologic factor, must be considered in the treatment of pressure ulcers, in that it can delay or prevent wound healing. These ulcers are warm, moist reservoirs for bacterial overgrowth, where antibiotic resistance may develop. A pressure ulcer may progress from simple contamination (as in any open wound) to gross infection (indicating bacterial tissue invasion). This may lead to uncommon but life-threatening complications (eg, bacteremia, sepsis, myonecrosis, gangrene, or necrotizing fasciitis).
Malnutrition, hypoproteinemia, and anemia reflect the overall status of the patient and can contribute to tissue vulnerability to trauma as well as cause delayed wound healing. Poor nutritional status certainly contributes to the chronicity often seen in these lesions and inhibits the ability of the immune system to prevent infections. Anemia indicates poor oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. Vascular disease and hypovolemia also may impair blood flow to the region of ulceration.
In patients with normal sensitivity, mobility, and mental faculty, pressure ulcers are unlikely. Conscious or unconscious feedback from the areas of compression leads them to change position, thereby shifting the pressure from one area to another long before any irreversible ischemic damage occurs. In individuals who cannot avoid long periods of uninterrupted pressure, the risk of necrosis and ulceration is increased. These individuals cannot protect themselves from the pressure unless they consciously change position or are helped to do so.
United States statistics
Pressure ulcers are common among patients hospitalized in acute- and chronic-care facilities. It has been estimated that about 1 million pressure ulcers occur in the United States; however, definitive information on the epidemiology and natural history of this condition is still limited. Unfortunately, studies to date have been encumbered by methodologic issues and variability in describing the lesions.[2, 23]
Reported incidences of pressure ulcer in hospitalized patients range from 2.7% to 29%, and reported prevalences in hospitalized patients range from 3.5% to 69%.[24, 25, 26, 27, 28] Patients in critical care units have an increased risk of pressure ulcers, as evidenced by a 33% incidence and a 41% prevalence.[29, 30]
The fifth National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey, conducted in 1999 among patients in acute care hospitals, showed an overall prevalence of 14.8%, with 7.1% of ulcers having occurred during that hospital visit. Of the various hospital settings, intensive care units (ICUs) had the highest prevalence, at 21.5%. The largest single age group of patients with pressure ulcers consisted of patients aged 71-80 years (29%).
Elderly patients admitted to acute care hospitals for nonelective orthopedic procedures are at even greater risk for pressure ulcer than other hospitalized patients are, with a 66% incidence.[32, 33] In a study of 658 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent surgery for hip fracture, Baumgarten et al found that 36.1% developed an acquired pressure ulcer within 32 days after hospital admission.
In nursing homes, the prevalence of pressure ulcers is 2.6-24%.[23, 35] ; the incidence is 25% in residents admitted from an acute care hospital. Patients with preexisting pressure ulcers show a 26% incidence of additional pressure ulcer formation over a 6-month period. The incidence in chronic care hospitals is reported to be 10.8%, whereas 33% of those admitted to a chronic care hospital have pressure ulcers. Long-term follow-up demonstrates that most ulcers heal within 1 year.[23, 38]
Among patients with neurologic impairments, pressure ulcers occur with an incidence of 7-8% annually, with a lifetime risk estimated to be 25-85%. Moreover, pressure ulcers are listed as the direct cause of death in 7-8% of all individuals with paraplegia; these individuals also have the highest recurrence rate (80%). In persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and associated comorbidity, the incidence of pressure ulcer is in the range of 25-66%.[42, 43, 44, 45]
A study of the prevalence of pressure ulcers in community residents with SCI demonstrated that those with higher-level SCI lesions carry a greater risk of developing pressure ulcers than those with lower-level lesions do. Of 100 patients with pressure ulcers, 33 had ulcers that were classified as stage 2 or greater. Black patients had more severe ulcers than other racial groups did.
Some authors speculate that detecting erythema can be more difficult with skin that has darker pigmentation. Because prolonged nonblanching erythema is typically an early warning sign of pressure ulcer risk and development, difficulty in detecting erythema can result in failure to recognize grade I pressure ulcers.
In a study from Germany that reviewed the prevalence of pressure ulcer in more than 18,000 patients residing in long-term care facilities, the prevalence was found to have decreased from 12.5% in 2002 to 5% in 2008. This decrease is thought to be due to more effective management strategies and better prevention.
The prevalence of pressure ulcer appears to have a bimodal age distribution. A small peak occurs during the third decade of life, reflecting ulceration in those with traumatic neurologic injury. Immobility and lack of sensation make these patients susceptible to developing pressure ulcers. Treatment of these lesions in this patient population represents a financial challenge, with one hospital reporting an average cost of $78,000 for each admission of a patient with a pressure ulcer.
As patients move from the age category of 40-58 years to the age category of 75 years or older, a larger increase in the incidence of pressure ulcers occurs. Two thirds of pressure ulcers occur in patients older than 70 years. As elderly individuals become the fastest-growing segment of the population, with an estimated 1.5 million people living in extended-care facilities, the problem of pressure ulcers will have an even more profound influence on the American economy.
Most younger individuals suffering from pressure ulceration are males. The higher incidence in males reflects the greater number of men suffering traumatic SCIs. In the older population, most patients with pressure ulcers are women, as a consequence of their survival advantage over men.
A study by Howard and Taylor found the incidence of pressure ulceration in nursing home residents in the southeastern United States to be higher in black patients than in white ones. The authors examined data from 113,869 nursing home residents, none of whom had pressure ulcers at nursing home admission. They determined that 4.7% of black residents developed postadmission ulcerations, compared with 3.4% of white residents.
In addition, the racial differences in pressure ulcer incidence displayed a sex predilection based on patient characteristics. The variation in incidence between black and white males was noted in residents who were dependent in mobility, whereas the difference in incidence between black and white females was noted in residents who were bedfast and living in nursing homes with fewer than 200 beds.
Pressure ulcers are listed as the direct cause of death in 7-8% of all patients with paraplegia.[51, 39] As many as one third of hospitalized patients with pressure ulcers die during their hospitalization. More than half of those who develop a pressure ulcer in the hospital will die within the next 12 months. As a rule, these patients die of their primary disease process rather than of pressure ulceration, but the pressure ulcer may be a contributing factor in some instances.
Each year, approximately 60,000 people die of complications of pressure ulcers. Individuals with pressure ulcers have a 4.5-times greater risk of death than persons with the same risk factors but without pressure ulcers. A secondary complication, wound-related bacteremia, can increase the risk of mortality to 55%.[52, 53, 54, 55]
The most common causes of fatality for patients with chronic pressure ulcers are renal failure and amyloidosis. In general, mortality is higher for patients who develop a new pressure ulcer and in whom the ulcer fails to heal.
Infection is the most common major complication of pressure ulcers. The offending pathologic organisms can be either anaerobic or aerobic. Aerobic pathogens commonly are present in all pressure ulcers, whereas anaerobes tend to be present more often in larger wounds (65% in grade III and above).
The organisms most commonly isolated from pressure ulcers are as follows:
Group D streptococci
Patients with bacteremia are more likely to have Bacteroides species in their pressure ulcers. These wounds need not be cultured routinely unless systemic signs of infection are present (eg, malodorous drainage, leukocytosis, fever, hypotension, increased heart rate, changes in mental status).
Clinical alertness is vital because the signs commonly associated with impeding or fulminating infection are frequently absent in elderly or immunocompromised patients. In geriatric patients with pressure ulcers, bacteremia is reported to occur at a rate of 3.5 per 10,000 hospital discharges.
In view of the high mortality in this population (nearly 50%), it is important that antibiotic treatment of wound infection or secondary bacteremia provide the appropriate spectrum of coverage specific to the offending organisms. Because indiscriminate use of antibiotics leads to resistant organisms and because the specific drugs of choice and antimicrobial agents change rapidly, management of these complex problems may be facilitated by consulting an infectious disease specialist.
Sepsis also can occur secondary to osteomyelitis, which has been reported to occur in 26% of nonhealing ulcers. A prospective study demonstrated that osteomyelitis was associated with nonhealing grade IV pressure ulcers in 86% of the study population.[58, 59] This study utilized 3-phase technetium methyl diphosphate radionuclide flow to detect early osteomyelitis.
Various tests can be used to diagnose osteomyelitis in patients with pressure ulcers. Plain radiographs have a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 50%, but radiographic findings often are not present in the early stages of infection. Bone scans are more sensitive, but their specificity is low (50%). Bone biopsy has the highest specificity (96%) and sensitivity (73%).[58, 59]
A combination of diagnostic tests (eg, white blood cell [WBC] count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and plain radiography) provides a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 88%. If all 3 test results are positive, the positive predictive value of this combination is 69%. If all 3 test results are negative, the negative predictive value is 96%.[58, 59]
Osteomyelitis should be considered whenever an ulcer does not heal, especially if the ulcer is over a bony prominence. Clinicians also should rule out other conditions associated with nonhealing ulcers, such as heterotopic calcification or ossification. Most findings indicate that antibiotic treatment for osteomyelitis should last 6-8 weeks. Surgery is needed for some cases of chronic osteomyelitis.
Systemic amyloidosis can result from chronic suppurative pressure ulcers. Additional complications of pressure ulcers include spreading cellulitis, a sinus tract abscess, septic arthritis, squamous cell carcinoma in the ulcer, a periurethral fistula, and heterotopic ossification. Because some of the secondary complications of pressure ulcers can preclude wound healing, they should be aggressively prevented and treated. Complications may include infection, pain, depression, and even death.
Patients and their support system must realize that it is their responsibility to avoid recurrent and new ulceration and that this is a lifelong process. Education on the proper avoidance of pressure should begin in the hospital and continue into the home.
Woolsey RM, McGarry JD. The cause, prevention, and treatment of pressure sores. Neurol Clin. 1991 Aug. 9(3):797-808. [Medline].
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure ulcers: incidence, economics, risk assessment. Consensus Development Conference Statement. West Dundee, Ill: SN Publications; 1989.
Abrussezze RS. Early assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers. Lee BY, ed. Chronic Ulcers of the Skin. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1985. 1-9.
Schweinberger MH, Roukis TS. Effectiveness of instituting a specific bed protocol in reducing complications associated with bed rest. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Jul-Aug. 49(4):340-7. [Medline].
Zhao G, Hiltabidel E, Liu Y, Chen L, Liao Y. A cross-sectional descriptive study of pressure ulcer prevalence in a teaching hospital in China. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Feb 1. 56(2):38-42. [Medline].
Bergstrom N, Braden B. A prospective study of pressure sore risk among institutionalized elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Aug. 40(8):747-58. [Medline].
Bergstrom N, Bennett MA, Carlson CE, et al. Treatment of Pressure Ulcers. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 14. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1994. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642.:
Frantz RA. Pressure ulcer costs in long term care. Decubitus. 1989 Aug. 2(3):56-7. [Medline].
Hibbs P. The economics of pressure ulcer prevention. Decubitus. 1988 Aug. 1(3):32-8. [Medline].
Pham B, Stern A, Chen W, Sander B, John-Baptiste A, Thein HH, et al. Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14. 171(20):1839-47. [Medline].
Pham B, Teague L, Mahoney J, Goodman L, Paulden M, Poss J, et al. Early prevention of pressure ulcers among elderly patients admitted through emergency departments: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Nov. 58(5):468-78.e3. [Medline].
Bergstrom N. Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Adults. Prediction and Prevention Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 3. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public Health Service. AHCPR Publication No. 920047. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1992.
Leblebici B, Turhan N, Adam M, Akman MN. Clinical and epidemiologic evaluation of pressure ulcers in patients at a university hospital in Turkey. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 Jul-Aug. 34(4):407-11. [Medline].
Daniel RK, Faibisoff B. Muscle coverage of pressure points--the role of myocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 1982 Jun. 8(6):446-52. [Medline].
Paget J. Clinical lecture on bed sores. Students J Hosp Gaz. 1873. 1:144-7. [Medline].
Gefen A. Reswick and Rogers pressure-time curve for pressure ulcer risk. Part 1. Nurs Stand. 2009 Jul 15-21. 23(45):64, 66, 68 passim. [Medline].
Gefen A. Reswick and Rogers pressure-time curve for pressure ulcer risk. Part 2. Nurs Stand. 2009 Jul 22-28. 23(46):40-4. [Medline].
LINDAN O, GREENWAY RM, PIAZZA JM. PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION ON THE SURFACE OF THE HUMAN BODY. I. EVALUATION IN LYING AND SITTING POSITIONS USING A "BED OF SPRINGS AND NAILS". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965 May. 46:378-85. [Medline].
Reuler JB, Cooney TG. The pressure sore: pathophysiology and principles of management. Ann Intern Med. 1981 May. 94(5):661-6. [Medline].
Le KM, Madsen BL, Barth PW, Ksander GA, Angell JB, Vistnes LM. An in-depth look at pressure sores using monolithic silicon pressure sensors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Dec. 74(6):745-56. [Medline].
Witkowski JA, Parish LC. Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982 Jun. 6(6):1014-21. [Medline].
Brandeis GH, Morris JN, Nash DJ, Lipsitz LA. The epidemiology and natural history of pressure ulcers in elderly nursing home residents. JAMA. 1990 Dec 12. 264(22):2905-9. [Medline].
Fogerty M, Guy J, Barbul A, Nanney LB, Abumrad NN. African Americans show increased risk for pressure ulcers: a retrospective analysis of acute care hospitals in America. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep-Oct. 17(5):678-84. [Medline].
Manley MT. Incidence, contributory factors and costs of pressure sores. S Afr Med J. 1978 Feb 11. 53(6):217-22. [Medline].
Gerson LW. The incidence of pressure sores in active treatment hospitals. Int J Nurs Stud. 1975. 12(4):201-4. [Medline].
Shannon ML, Skorga P. Pressure ulcer prevalence in two general hospitals. Decubitus. 1989 Nov. 2(4):38-43. [Medline].
Meehan M. Multisite pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Decubitus. 1990 Nov. 3(4):14-7. [Medline].
Bergstrom N, Demuth PJ, Braden BJ. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun. 22(2):417-28. [Medline].
Robnett MK. The incidence of skin breakdown in a surgical intensive care unit. J Nurs Qual Assur. 1986 Nov. 1(1):77-81. [Medline].
Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM. The 1999 National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey: a benchmarking approach. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001 Nov-Dec. 14(6):297-301. [Medline].
Roberts BV, Goldstone LA. A survey of pressure sores in the over sixties on two orthopaedic wards. Int J Nurs Stud. 1979. 16(4):355-64. [Medline].
Baumgarten M, Margolis DJ, Orwig DL, Shardell MD, Hawkes WG, Langenberg P, et al. Pressure ulcers in elderly patients with hip fracture across the continuum of care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 May. 57(5):863-70. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Reed JW. Pressure ulcers in the elderly: prevention and treatment utilizing the team approach. Md State Med J. 1981 Nov. 30(11):45-50. [Medline].
Barbenel JC, Jordan MM, Nicol SM, Clark MO. Incidence of pressure-sores in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area. Lancet. 1977 Sep 10. 2(8037):548-50. [Medline].
Schols JM, Heyman H, Meijer EP. Nutritional support in the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers: an overview of studies with an arginine enriched oral nutritional supplement. J Tissue Viability. 2009 Aug. 18(3):72-9. [Medline].
Berlowitz DR, Wilking SV. Risk factors for pressure sores. A comparison of cross-sectional and cohort-derived data. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989 Nov. 37(11):1043-50. [Medline].
Kenkel JM. Pressure Sores (overview). Kenkel JM. Selected Read Plast Surg. Texas: Baylor University Medical Center; 1998. Vol 8, No 39: 1-29.
Klitzman B, Kalinowski C, Glasofer SL, Rugani L. Pressure ulcers and pressure relief surfaces. Clin Plast Surg. 1998 Jul. 25(3):443-50. [Medline].
Evans GR, Dufresne CR, Manson PN. Surgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center: is it efficacious?. Adv Wound Care. 1994 Jan. 7(1):40-6. [Medline].
Fuhrer MJ, Garber SL, Rintala DH, Clearman R, Hart KA. Pressure ulcers in community-resident persons with spinal cord injury: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Nov. 74(11):1172-7. [Medline].
Basson MD, Burney RE. Defective wound healing in patients with paraplegia and quadriplegia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Jul. 155(1):9-12. [Medline].
Regan MA, Teasell RW, Wolfe DL, Keast D, Mortenson WB, Aubut JA. A systematic review of therapeutic interventions for pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb. 90(2):213-31. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Okamoto GA, Lamers JV, Shurtleff DB. Skin breakdown in patients with myelomeningocele. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Jan. 64(1):20-3. [Medline].
Basset A, Liautaud B, Ndiaye B. Dermatology of Black Skin. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
Lahmann NA, Dassen T, Poehler A, Kottner J. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates from 2002 to 2008 in German long-term care facilities. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Apr. 22(2):152-6. [Medline].
Fogerty MD, Abumrad NN, Nanney L, Arbogast PG, Poulose B, Barbul A. Risk factors for pressure ulcers in acute care hospitals. Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb. 16(1):11-8. [Medline].
Paletta C, Bartell T, Shehadi S. Applications of the posterior thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1993 Jan. 30(1):41-7. [Medline].
Howard DL, Taylor YJ. Racial and gender differences in pressure ulcer development among nursing home residents in the Southeastern United States. J Women Aging. 2009. 21(4):266-78. [Medline].
Dinsdale SM. Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1974 Apr. 55(4):147-52. [Medline].
Allman RM. Pressure ulcers among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 30. 320(13):850-3. [Medline].
Allman RM, Walker JM, Hart MK, Laprade CA, Noel LB, Smith CR. Air-fluidized beds or conventional therapy for pressure sores. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Nov. 107(5):641-8. [Medline].
Maklebust J. Pressure ulcers: etiology and prevention. Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun. 22(2):359-77. [Medline].
Doughty D. The process of wound healing: a nursing perspective. Prog Develop Ostomy Wound Care. 1990. 2:3-12.
Vaziri ND, Cesarior T, Mootoo K, Zeien L, Gordon S, Byrne C. Bacterial infections in patients with chronic renal failure: occurrence with spinal cord injury. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Jul. 142(7):1273-6. [Medline].
Peromet M, Labbe M, Yourassowsky E, Schoutens E. Anaerobic bacteria isolated from decubitus ulcers. Infection. 1973. 1(4):205-7. [Medline].
Deloach ED, Christy RS, Ruf LE, et al. Osteomyelitis underlying severe pressure sores. Contemp Surg. 1992. 40:25-32.
Deloach ED, DiBenedetto RJ, Womble L, Gilley JD. The treatment of osteomyelitis underlying pressure ulcers. Decubitus. 1992 Nov. 5(6):32-41. [Medline].
Yarkony GM. Pressure ulcers: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Aug. 75(8):908-17. [Medline].
Relander M, Palmer B. Recurrence of surgically treated pressure sores. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1988. 22(1):89-92. [Medline].
Stausberg J, Kiefer E. Classification of pressure ulcers: a systematic literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009. 146:511-5. [Medline].
Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, Dorner B, Edsberg L, Langemo D, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system. Dermatol Nurs. 2007 Aug. 19(4):343-9; quiz 350. [Medline].
Copcu E. Marjolin's ulcer: a preventable complication of burns?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul. 124(1):156e-64e. [Medline].
Berkwits L, Yarkony GM, Lewis V. Marjolin's ulcer complicating a pressure ulcer: case report and literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Nov. 67(11):831-3. [Medline].
Mustoe T, Upton J, Marcellino V, Tun CJ, Rossier AB, Hachend HJ. Carcinoma in chronic pressure sores: a fulminant disease process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Jan. 77(1):116-21. [Medline].
Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Alpert BS. The muscle flap in the treatment of chronic lower extremity osteomyelitis: results in patients over 5 years after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Aug. 88(2):311-8. [Medline].
Evans GR, Lewis VL Jr, Manson PN, Loomis M, Vander Kolk CA. Hip joint communication with pressure sore: the refractory wound and the role of Girdlestone arthroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Feb. 91(2):288-94. [Medline].
Lewis VL Jr, Bailey MH, Pulawski G, Kind G, Bashioum RW, Hendrix RW. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Feb. 81(2):229-32. [Medline].
James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini Ed, Secor P, Sestrich J, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb. 16(1):37-44. [Medline].
Kirker KR, Secor PR, James GA, Fleckman P, Olerud JE, Stewart PS. Loss of viability and induction of apoptosis in human keratinocytes exposed to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep-Oct. 17(5):690-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Schierle CF, De la Garza M, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD. Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 May-Jun. 17(3):354-9. [Medline].
Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL. Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care. 2008 Nov. 17(11):502-8. [Medline].
Knauer CJ. Management of malignant fungating breast lesions. Prog Develop Ostomy Wound Care. 1990. 2:3-11.
Gorecki C, Nixon J, Madill A, Firth J, Brown JM. What influences the impact of pressure ulcers on health-related quality of life? A qualitative patient-focused exploration of contributory factors. J Tissue Viability. 2012 Feb. 21(1):3-12. [Medline].
[Guideline] Qaseem A, Mir TP, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Risk assessment and prevention of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the american college of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3. 162(5):359-69. [Medline].
[Guideline] Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Forciea MA, Starkey M, Denberg TD. Treatment of pressure ulcers: a clinical practice guideline from the american college of physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Mar 3. 162(5):370-9. [Medline].
Banks MD, Graves N, Bauer JD, Ash S. Cost effectiveness of nutrition support in the prevention of pressure ulcer in hospitals. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan. 67(1):42-6. [Medline].
Cereda E, Gini A, Pedrolli C, Vanotti A. Disease-specific, versus standard, nutritional support for the treatment of pressure ulcers in institutionalized older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug. 57(8):1395-402. [Medline].
Beeckman D, Clays E, Van Hecke A, Vanderwee K, Schoonhoven L, Verhaeghe S. A multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement an electronic clinical decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: a two-armed randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Apr. 50(4):475-86. [Medline].
Benbow M, Bateman S. Working towards clinical excellence Pressure ulcer prevention and management in primary and secondary care. J Wound Care. 2012 Sep. 21(9):S25-40. [Medline].
Allen V, Ryan DW, Murray A. Air-fluidized beds and their ability to distribute interface pressures generated between the subject and the bed surface. Physiol Meas. 1993 Aug. 14(3):359-64. [Medline].
Allen V, Ryan DW, Murray A. Potential for bed sores due to high pressures: influence of body sites, body position, and mattress design. Br J Clin Pract. 1993 Jul-Aug. 47(4):195-7. [Medline].
Maklebust JA, Mondoux L, Sieggreen M. Pressure relief characteristics of various support surfaces used in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. J Enterostomal Ther. 1986 May-Jun. 13(3):85-9. [Medline].
Patel UH, Jones JT, Babbs CF, Bourland JD, Graber GP. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat. Decubitus. 1993 May. 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. [Medline].
Seiler WO, Allen S, Stähelin HB. Influence of the 30 degrees laterally inclined position and the 'super-soft' 3-piece mattress on skin oxygen tension on areas of maximum pressure--implications for pressure sore prevention. Gerontology. 1986. 32(3):158-66. [Medline].
Heyneman A, Vanderwee K, Grypdonck M, Defloor T. Effectiveness of two cushions in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009. 6(2):114-20. [Medline].
Aronovitch SA. A retrospective study of the use of specialty beds in the medical and surgical intensive care units of a tertiary care facility. Decubitus. 1992 Jan. 5(1):36-42. [Medline].
Reddy N, Cochran G. Phenomenological theory underlying pressure-time relationship in decubitus ulcer formation. Fed Proc. 1979. 38:1153.
Thompson-Bishop JY, Mottola CM. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces. Decubitus. 1992 Mar. 5(2):42-6, 48. [Medline].
McInnes E, Dumville JC, Jammali-Blasi A, Bell-Syer SE. Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7. CD009490. [Medline].
Bryant R. Acute and Chronic Wounds: Nursing Management. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1992.
Exton-Smith AN, Overstall PW, Wedgwood J, Wallace G. Use of the 'air wave system' to prevent pressure sores in hospital. Lancet. 1982 Jun 5. 1(8284):1288-90. [Medline].
Watanabe S, Yamada K, Ono S, Ishibashi Y. Skin changes in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: light and electron microscopic observations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987 Dec. 17(6):1006-12. [Medline].
Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ, Rutledge FS, Clark BJ. Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of an air suspension bed in the prevention of pressure ulcers. JAMA. Mar 3 1993. 269(9):1139-43.
Conine TA, Daechsel D, Lau MS. The role of alternating air and Silicore overlays in preventing decubitus ulcers. Int J Rehabil Res. 1990. 13(1):57-65. [Medline].
Jackson BS, Chagares R, Nee N, Freeman K. The effects of a therapeutic bed on pressure ulcers: an experimental study. J Enterostomal Ther. Nov-Dec 1988. 15(6):220-6.
Strauss MJ, Gong J, Gary BD, Kalsbeek WD, Spear S. The cost of home air-fluidized therapy for pressure sores. A randomized controlled trial. J Fam Pract. 1991 Jul. 33(1):52-9. [Medline].
Warner DJ. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers. Decubitus. 1992 May. 5(3):52-5, 58-60, 62-4. [Medline].
Cullum N, McInnes E, Bell-Syer SE, Legood R. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. CD001735:
McInnes E, Jammali-Blasi A, Bell-Syer SE, Dumville JC, Cullum N. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13. CD001735. [Medline].
Clark M, Hiskett G, Russell L. Evidence-based practice and support surfaces: are we throwing the baby out with the bath water?. J Wound Care. 2005 Nov. 14(10):455-8. [Medline].
University Hospital Consortium. Guidelines for the Use of Pressure Relief Devices in the Treatment and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers. Oak Brook, IL: University Hospital Consortium Technology Advancement Center; 1990.
Parish LC, Witkowski JA. Clinitron therapy and the decubitus ulcer: preliminary dermatologic studies. Int J Dermatol. 1980 Nov. 19(9):517-8. [Medline].
St. Clair M. Survey of the uses of the Pegasus airwave system in the United Kingdom. J Tissue Viabil. 1992. 12:9-16.
Crewe R. Problems of rubber ring nursing cushions and a clinical survey of alternative cushions for ill patients. Care Sci Pract. 1987. 5:9-11.
Andersen KE, Jensen O, Kvorning SA, Bach E. Decubitus prophylaxis: a prospective trial on the efficiency of alternating-pressure air-mattresses and water-mattresses. Acta Derm Venereol. 1983. 63(3):227-30.
Daechsel D, Conine TA. Special mattresses: effectiveness in preventing decubitus ulcers in chronic neurologic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Apr. 66(4):246-8. [Medline].
Jester J, Weaver V. A report of clinical investigation of various tissue support surfaces used for the prevention, early intervention and management of pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. Jan-Feb 1990. 26:39-45.
Whitney JD, Fellows BJ, Larson E. Do mattresses make a difference?. J Gerontol Nurs. 1984 Sep. 10(9):20-5. [Medline].
Lindan O. Etiology of decubitus ulcers: an experimental study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1961. 42:774-83.
DeLateur BJ, Berni R, Hangladarom T, Giaconi R. Wheelchair cushions designed to prevent pressure sores: an evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976 Mar. 57(3):129-35. [Medline].
Fergson-Pell M, Cochran G, Cardi M, Trachtman L. A knowledge-based program for pressure sore prevention. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1986. 463:284-286.
Garber SL, Krouskop TA, Carter RE. A system for clinically evaluating wheelchair pressure-relief cushions. Am J Occup Ther. 1978 Oct. 32(9):565-70. [Medline].
VanEtten NK, Sexton P, Smith R. Development and implementation of a skin care program. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1990 Mar-Apr. 27:40-54. [Medline].
International Association of Enterostomal Therapy. Dermal wounds: pressure sores. Philosophy of the IAET. J Enterostomal Ther. Jan-Feb 1988. 15(1):4-17.
Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk. Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug. 36(4):205-10. [Medline].
Norton D. Calculating the risk: reflections on the Norton Scale. Decubitus. 1989 Aug. 2(3):24-31. [Medline].
Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith A. An Investigation of Geriatric Nursing Problems in Hospital. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.
Smoot EC 3rd. Clinitron bed therapy hazards. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Jan. 77(1):165. [Medline].
Nimit K. Guidelines for home air-fluidized bed therapy, 1989. Health Technol Assess Rep. 1989. 1-11. [Medline].
Bruce TA, Shever LL, Tschannen D, Gombert J. Reliability of pressure ulcer staging: a review of literature and 1 institution's strategy. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012 Jan-Mar. 35(1):85-101. [Medline].
Black JM, Black SB. Surgical management of pressure ulcers. Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun. 22(2):429-38. [Medline].
Cooper DM. Challenge of open wound assessment in the home setting. Prog Develop Ostomy Wound Care. 1990. 2:11-18.
Rodeheaver GT, Kurtz L, Kircher BJ, Edlich RF. Pluronic F-68: a promising new skin wound cleanser. Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Nov. 9(11):572-6. [Medline].
Johnson AR, White AC, McNalley B. Comparison of common topical agents for wound treatment: cytotoxicity for human fibroblast in culture. Wounds. 1989. 1:186-92.
Bryant CA, Rodeheaver GT, Reem EM, Nichter LS, Kenney JG, Edlich RF. Search for a nontoxic surgical scrub solution for periorbital lacerations. Ann Emerg Med. 1984 May. 13(5):317-21. [Medline].
Hutchinson JJ, McGuckin M. Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review. ; Am J Infect Control. Aug 1990. 18(4):257-68.
Krasner D. Shifting paradigms for wound care: dressing decisions; multidisciplinary care; effectiveness. Portnow J, ed. Wound Care. Vol 1. Durable Medical Equipment Review;: . 1994. 12.
Gilchrist T, Martin AM. Wound treatment with Sorbsan--an alginate fibre dressing. Biomaterials. 1983 Oct. 4(4):317-20. [Medline].
McMullen D. Clinical experience with a calcium alginate dressing. Dermatol Nurs. 1991 Aug. 3(4):216-9, 270. [Medline].
Ho CH, Bensitel T, Wang X, Bogie KM. Pulsatile lavage for the enhancement of pressure ulcer healing: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Jan. 92(1):38-48. [Medline].
Flemming K, Cullum N. Electromagnetic therapy for the treatment of pressure sores. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. CD002930. [Medline].
Levine SP, Kett RL, Gross MD, Wilson BA, Cederna PS, Juni JE. Blood flow in the gluteus maximus of seated individuals during electrical muscle stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Aug. 71(9):682-6. [Medline].
Rees RS, Robson MC, Smiell JM, Perry BH. Becaplermin gel in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 May-Jun. 7(3):141-7. [Medline].
Landi F, Aloe L, Russo A, et al. Topical treatment of pressure ulcers with nerve growth factor: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. Oct 21 2003. 139(8):635-41.
Falanga V, Zitelli JA, Eaglstein WH. Wound healing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 Sep. 19(3):559-63. [Medline].
Salcido R, Carney J, Fisher S, et al. A reliable animal model of pressure sore development: The role of free radicals. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1993. 16:61.
Salcido R, Donofrio JC, Fisher SB, LeGrand EK, Dickey K, Carney JM, et al. Histopathology of pressure ulcers as a result of sequential computer-controlled pressure sessions in a fuzzy rat model. Adv Wound Care. 1994 Sep. 7(5):23-4, 26, 28 passim. [Medline].
Salcido R, Fisher SB, Donofrio JC, Bieschke M, Knapp C, Liang R, et al. An animal model and computer-controlled surface pressure delivery system for the production of pressure ulcers. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995 May. 32(2):149-61. [Medline].
Ford CN, Reinhard ER, Yeh D, Syrek D, De Las Morenas A, Bergman SB, et al. Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Jul. 49(1):55-61; discussion 61. [Medline].
Evans D, Land L. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. CD001898. [Medline].
Gupta S, Baharestani M, Baranoski S, et al. Guidelines for managing pressure ulcers with negative pressure wound therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care. Nov-Dec 2004. 17 Suppl 2.
Niezgoda JA. Combining negative pressure wound therapy with other wound management modalities. Ostomy Wound Manage. Feb 2005. 51(2A Suppl):36-8.
Mendez-Eastman S. Guidelines for using negative pressure wound therapy. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001 Nov-Dec. 14(6):314-22; quiz 324-5. [Medline].
Anthony JP, Huntsman WT, Mathes SJ. Changing trends in the management of pelvic pressure ulcers: a 12-year review. Decubitus. 1992 May. 5(3):44-7, 50-1. [Medline].
Becker H. The distally-based gluteus maximus muscle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 May. 63(5):653-6. [Medline].
Bruck JC, Büttemeyer R, Grabosch A, Gruhl L. More arguments in favor of myocutaneous flaps for the treatment of pelvic pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. 1991 Jan. 26(1):85-8. [Medline].
Fincham JE. Smoking cessation: treatment options and the pharmacist's role. Am Pharm. 1992 May. NS32(5):62-70. [Medline].
Read RC. Presidential address. Systemic effects of smoking. Am J Surg. 1984 Dec. 148(6):706-11. [Medline].
Brand P. Pressure sores, the problem. Kenedi R, Cowden J, Scales J, eds. Bed Sore Biomechanics. London: MacMillan Press; 1976. 19-23.
Sanchez S, Eamegdool S, Conway H. Surgical treatment of decubitus ulcers in paraplegics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969 Jan. 43(1):25-8. [Medline].
Exton-Smith AN, Sherwin RW. The prevention of pressure sores. Significance of spontaneous bodily movements. Lancet. Nov 18 1961. 2:1124-6.
Kroll SS, Rosenfield L. Perforator-based flaps for low posterior midline defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Apr. 81(4):561-6. [Medline].
Vyas SC, Binns JH, Wilson AN. Thoracolumbar-sacral flaps in the treatment of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Feb. 65(2):159-63. [Medline].
Daniel RK, Hall EJ, MacLeod MK. Pressure sores-a reappraisal. Ann Plast Surg. 1979 Jul. 3(1):53-63. [Medline].
Vasconez LO, Schneider WJ, Trukiewicz MJ. Pressure sores. Curr Probl Surg. 1977. 24:23.
He J, Xu H, Wang T, Ma S, Dong J. Treatment of complex ischial pressure sores with free partial lateral latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps in paraplegic patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 May. 65(5):634-9. [Medline].
Lin H, Hou C, Chen A, Xu Z. Treatment of ischial pressure sores using a modified gracilis myofasciocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2010 Apr. 26(3):153-7. [Medline].
Gould WL, Montero N, Cukic J, Hagerty RC, Hester TR. The "split" gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Feb. 93(2):330-6. [Medline].
Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Apr. 91(4):678-83. [Medline].
Hill HL, Brown RG, Jurkiewicz MJ. The transverse lumbosacral back flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978 Aug. 62(2):177-84. [Medline].
Nahai F, Silverton JS, Hill HL, Vasconez LO. The tensor fascia lata musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1978 Jul. 1(4):372-9. [Medline].
Wound, ostomy and continence nurses society position statement on avoidable versus unavoidable pressure ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug. 36(4):378-81. [Medline].
Bozzetti F, Terno G, Longoni C. Parenteral hyperalimentation and wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975 Nov. 141(5):712-4. [Medline].
Schoonhoven L, Grobbee DE, Donders AR, et al. .Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment. Qual Saf Health Care. Feb 2006. 15(1):65-70.
Walton-Geer PS. Prevention of pressure ulcers in the surgical patient. AORN J. 2009 Mar. 89(3):538-48; quiz 549-51. [Medline].
Saleh M, Anthony D, Parboteeah S. The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among hospitalised patients. J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jul. 18(13):1923-9. [Medline].
Kosiak M. Prevention and rehabilitation of pressure ulcers. Decubitus. May 1991. 4(2):60-2, 64, 66 passim.
Smith AM, Malone JA. Preventing pressure ulcers in institutionalized elders: assessing the effects of small, unscheduled shifts in body position. Decubitus. 1990 Nov. 3(4):20-4. [Medline].
Milne CT, Trigilia D, Houle TL, Delong S, Rosenblum D. Reducing pressure ulcer prevalence rates in the long-term acute care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009 Apr. 55(4):50-9. [Medline].
|Air||Low maintenance; inexpensive; multipatient use; durable||Can be punctured; requires proper inflation|
|Gel||Low maintenance; easy to clean; multipatient use; resists puncture||Heavy; expensive; little research|
|Foam||Lightweight; resists puncture; no maintenance||Retains heat and moisture; limited life|
|Water||Readily available in community; easy to clean||Requires heater; transfers are difficult; can leak; heavy; difficult to maintain; procedures difficult|
|Dynamic overlays||Easy to clean; moisture control; deflates for transfers; reusable pump||Noisy; can be damaged by sharp objects; requires assembly; requires power|
|Replacement mattresses||Reduced staff time; multipatient use; easy to clean; low maintenance||High initial cost’ may not control moisture; loses effectiveness|
|Low air loss||Head and foot of bed can be raised; less frequent turning required; relieves pressure; reduces shear and friction; moisture control||Noisy; expensive; transfers are difficult; requires energy source; restricts mobility; requires skilled setup; rental charge|
|Air fluidized||Reduces shear and friction; lowest interface pressure; low moisture; less frequent turning required||Expensive; noisy; heavy; dehydration and electrolyte imbalances can occur; may cause disorientation; transfers are difficult; hot|
|Major Dressing Type||Key Performance Characteristics|
|Alginates (sheets and fillers)||Exudate absorption; obliteration of dead space; autolytic débridement|
|Foams (sheets and fillers)||Obliteration of dead space; retention of moisture; exudate absorption; mechanical débridement|
|Gauzes (woven and nonwoven)||Obliteration of dead space; retention of moisture; exudate absorption; mechanical débridement|
|Hydrocolloids (wafers and fillers)||Occlusion; retention of moisture; obliteration of dead space; autolytic débridement|
|Hydrogels (sheets and fillers)||Retention of moisture; autolytic débridement|
|Transparent films||Occlusion; retention of moisture; autolytic débridement|
|Wound fillers||Obliteration of dead space; exudate absorption; retention of moisture; autolytic débridement|
|Wound pouches||Exudate control|
|Area of Comparison||Norton Scale||Braden Scale|
|Assessment criteria||Physical condition; mental condition; activity; mobility; incontinence (score ≥12 is at risk)||Activity; mobility; sensory perception; moisture; nutrition; friction; shear|
|Attributes||Tested on elderly persons in hospital settings||Evaluated in diverse sites (eg, medical-surgical, intensive care units, nursing homes)|
|Replications||Tested extensively||Tested extensively|
|Reliability||Not available||Good interrater reliability|