Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Clinical Presentation
- Author: Marcus Monroe, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA more...
History
A detailed patient history often reveals the presence of one or more risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (see Etiology). The clinician should be obtain at least the following information:
- Existing medical conditions such as xeroderma pigmentosum, or previous history of cutaneous malignancies (basal cell carcinoma [BCC], SCC, sebaceous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma)
- Immunocompetency of patient (risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome [AIDS], history of organ transplant, current chemotherapy, immunosuppression, hematologic malignancy [chronic lymphocytic leukemia])
- History of significant sun exposure, occupational exposures (oils, tars, soot)
- Previous history of skin insult or trauma (eg, scars from old burns [Marjolin ulcer][72] or vaccinations)
- Family history of skin cancer
- Previous history of benign lesions (eg, actinic keratosis, chalazion); recurrence after treatment of lesion
- Duration for which lesion has been present
- Change in size, contour, or color of lesion - An assessment of the rate of tumor growth is important, as this often reflects the aggressiveness of the lesion.
The initial presentation of cutaneous SCC typically includes a history of a nonhealing ulcer or abnormal growth in a sun-exposed area (see the image below). Similarly, many precancerous lesions (eg, actinic keratosis, Bowen dermatosis) also appear to be related to ultraviolet light exposure. SCC can develop even if the history of sun exposure occurred decades before development of the skin lesion.[13]
Large, sun-induced squamous cell carcinoma on the forehead/temple with superficial erosion. Image courtesy of Glenn Goldman, MD. Approximately 70% of all cutaneous SCCs occur on the head and neck, most frequently involving the lower lip, external ear, and periauricular region or the forehead and scalp, with an additional 15% found on the upper extremities (see the following image). Frequently, the presentation is preceded by the presence of actinic keratosis. These precancerous lesions appear as scaly plaques or papules, often with an erythematous base. Actinic keratosis is usually only several millimeters in size and ranges from normal skin color to pink or brown; patients with this condition have an estimated 6-10% lifetime risk of developing skin cancer.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the dorsal wrist. Courtesy of Hon Pak, MD. The most common head and neck sites for SCC are the floor of the mouth, the tongue, the soft palate, the anterior tonsillar pillar, and the retromolar trigone. Although most patients with SCC are asymptomatic, symptoms such as bleeding, weeping, pain, or tenderness may be noted, especially with larger tumors. When lesions become palpable masses, symptoms such as a vague persistent sore throat or ear infection occur. Numbness, tingling, or muscle weakness may reflect underlying perineural involvement, and this history finding is important to elicit, because it adversely influences prognosis.[76] Irritation and/or chronic conjunctivitis may accompany conjunctival SCC, such as in chronic wearers of contact lenses[77] ; patients may notice a conjunctival mass, which may be enlarging. Ocular symptoms such as decreased vision, diplopia, increasing proptosis, or ocular surface irritation may be associated with eyelid SCC.
Occult nasopharyngeal carcinoma may present long before the tumor is locally detected. In fact, patients rarely present with this mass and usually present with a cervical neck mass due to lymph node metastasis from the tumor. Other signs or symptoms that may call attention to a neoplasm in the nasopharynx are unilateral serous otitis media, nasal obstruction, epistaxis, hearing loss, headache, and involvement of the cranial nerves. Patients with Marjolin ulcer may report a change in the skin (eg, induration, elevation, ulceration, weeping) at the site of a preexisting scar or ulcer. The average latency period is 35 years[78] ; therefore, the diagnosis requires a high index of clinical suspicion.
Virally induced SCC most commonly manifests as a new or enlarging warty growth on the penis, vulva, perianal area, or periungual region. Patients often present with a history of "warts" that have been refractory to various treatment modalities in the past. A history of previously documented genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection may be elicited.
The location of papillary SCC determines the symptoms. The size of the lesions ranges from smaller than 1 cm to larger than 5 cm. At any site, this exophytic, fungiform mass usually causes mechanical interference, which brings the lesion to attention of the patient or clinician. For example, a large lesion in the oral cavity may interfere with mastication, it may bleed because of trauma, or it may simply annoy the patient. In the larynx, hoarseness is by far the most common first indication of the neoplasm.
Physical Examination
Every patient with suspected squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) should undergo a comprehensive head and neck examination, including the following:
- Location of lesion (eg, eyelid SCC is more common on the lower eyelid)
- Size of lesion
- Character of lesion (smooth/nodular, vascularity, color) – SCC may appear as plaques or nodules with variable degrees of scale, crust, or ulceration
- Presence of ulceration
- Evaluation of subcutaneous tissues (depth of lesion, bony involvement)
- Palpation of preauricular, submandibular, and cervical lymph nodes
In all patients with SCC or suspected SCC, the draining nodal basins should be palpated. If nodes are palpable, a biopsy should be performed using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or excision. If lymph nodes are clinically negative but the tumor meets high-risk criteria, there are few data available to guide what should be done next. Subsequently, management currently varies with regard to further staging.[60]
General appearance of lesion
The overall appearance of any skin lesion must be detailed. Of course, the presenting appearance of each cutaneous SCC varies according to the site and extent of disease. In addition to clinical notes, use photography to document the appearance of the lesion(s).
External photograph of a large, ulcerated, invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the left lower eyelid. This patient also had perineural invasion of the infraorbital nerve extending into the cranial base. The classic presentation of an SCC is that of a shallow ulcer with heaped-up edges, often covered by a plaque. These lesions are termed erythroplasia (see Definitions and Clinical Terminology) and deserve biopsy. One third of lesions are pure white; they are known as leukoplakia, but only 10% of them are carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma.
Surface changes of typical SCC may include scaling, ulceration, crusting, or the presence of a cutaneous horn. Less commonly, the lesion may manifest as a pink cutaneous nodule without overlying surface changes. The absence of surface changes should raise suspicion of a metastatic focus from another skin or nonskin primary site or a different and potentially more lethal tumor such as Merkel cell carcinoma. A background of severely sun-damaged skin, including solar elastosis, mottled dyspigmentation, telangiectasia, and multiple actinic keratoses, is often noted.
Clinically, lesions of SCC in situ (SCCIS) range from a scaly pink patch to a thin keratotic papule or plaque similar to an actinic keratosis. Bowen disease is a subtype of SCCIS characterized by a sharply demarcated pink plaque arising on non–sun-exposed skin (see the first image below). Erythroplasia of Queyrat refers to Bowen disease of the glans penis, which manifests as one or more velvety red plaques (see the second image below).
Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen disease). Courtesy of Hon Pak, MD.
cell carcinoma of the penis. Courtesy of Hon Pak, MD. SCC of the lip usually arises on the vermillion border of the lower lip. It is sometimes predated by a precursor lesion, actinic cheilitis, which manifests as xerosis, fissuring, atrophy, and dyspigmentation. Actinic cheilitis is analogous to actinic keratosis of the skin. SCC on the lip manifests as a new papule, erosion, or focus of erythema/induration. Intraoral SCC typically manifests as a white plaque (leukoplakia) with or without reddish reticulation (erythroplakia). Common locations include the anterior floor of the mouth, the lateral tongue, and the buccal vestibule (see the images below).
This image depicts reddening of the soft palate, perhaps with scattered areas of white and velvet red patches; tobacco-induced squamous cell carcinoma involving the tongue base and/or supraglottis; and a firm, mobile mass that is palpable at the left carotid bifurcation.
This image shows scattered red and white patches, some of which are thick, with inflammation of the underlying mucosa. Periungual SCC typically mimics a verruca and is frequently misdiagnosed for years as a wart before biopsy. Less commonly, the lesions may resemble chronic paronychia with swelling, erythema, and tenderness of the nail fold; onychodystrophy also may be noted. Periungual SCC is frequently associated with human papillomavirus (HPV).[79]
Marjolin ulcer appears as a new area of induration, elevation, or ulceration at the site of a preexisting scar or ulcer. The diagnosis of Marjolin ulcer should be considered in any ulcer that fails to heal with standard therapy.
SCC in the anogenital region may manifest as a moist, red plaque on the glans penis; indurated or ulcerated lesions may be seen on the vulva, external anus, or scrotum. Verrucous carcinoma is a subtype of SCC that can be locally destructive but rarely metastasizes. Lesions appear as exophytic, fungating, verrucous nodules or plaques, which may be described as cauliflowerlike. Verrucous carcinoma is further subdivided based on its location in the anogenital region (Buschke-Löwenstein tumor), the oral cavity (oral florid papillomatosis), and the plantar foot (epithelioma cuniculatum).
Invasive SCC involves the epidermis and invades the dermis. The tumors initially appear as skin patches, plaques, and nodules that enlarge and develop central areas of inflammation, induration, and, subsequently, necrosis and oozing.
Size and location of lesion
In addition to the general appearance of the lesion, the size and location of the SCC should be recorded, as both have prognostic and therapeutic importance. For instance, lesions larger than 2 cm and those located on the external ear and lip have been shown to have a higher rate of metastatic spread (see the image below). Additionally, tumor size and location affect the cosmetic and functional outcome of surgical excision. Therefore, reconstructive options should be carefully considered in the assessment of every head and neck cutaneous SCC. Lesions located near critical areas, such as around the eyes, may require additional evaluation by a dedicated reconstructive surgeon before excision.
External photograph of a large, ulcerated, invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the left lower eyelid. This patient also had perineural invasion of the infraorbital nerve extending into the cranial base. Up to 14% of cutaneous SCCs exhibit perineural invasion. Evidence of cranial nerve dysfunction on examination should raise concern of significant perineural invasion. The most frequently involved cranial nerves are the facial and trigeminal nerves, underscoring the importance of assessment of facial movement and sensation. Therefore, every patient with head and neck cutaneous SCC should undergo systematic evaluation of cranial nerve function.
Finally, regional lymphatics should be assessed for metastatic spread. Regional metastasis of cutaneous SCC occurs in 2-6% of cases. The risk of metastasis correlates roughly with tumor size and differentiation. The most frequently involved lymphatics include those located within the parotid gland and upper cervical lymph node levels. Investigate regional spread by palpating for enlarged lymph nodes in the head and neck region.
Rarely, cutaneous SCC presents as a parotid or neck mass because of lymphatic spread from an occult cutaneous lesion or remotely treated skin cancer (see image below). The median time from initial treatment to presentation with a parotid or neck mass ranges from 10 to 13 months. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy can be of assistance in the evaluation of any mass suspected to represent occult metastasis.
Preauricular and helical scars (black arrows) from previous excisions are noted in a patient who presented with cervical metastases (white arrow) from an occult cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Distinguishing conjunctival SCC from conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia is difficult on clinical examination alone[80] ; conjunctival SCC represents a type of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia that has either broken through the basement membrane to involve the subepithelial tissue or has metastasized. Epithelial tumors of the conjunctiva are similar to conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia.[81, 82, 83]
Most SCCs involving the conjunctiva manifest as chronic, unilateral, localized patches of redness or more diffuse conjunctivitis; they can also present as a mass in the interpalpebral fissure at the nasal or temporal limbus with a gelatinous and velvety, papilliform, or leukoplakic appearance. Prominent feeder vessels may be seen. The corneoscleral limbus is the most common location, although the palpebral conjunctiva or cornea may be involved, particularly in the interpalpebral region.
Given its variable appearance, conjunctival SCC may pose a diagnostic challenge as a masquerade syndrome. Patients with an atypical pterygium may have a conjunctival tumor. These patients should be observed much more closely than patients with a classic pterygium. Individuals who are HIV positive and patients with xeroderma pigmentosa are more likely to develop conjunctival SCC, probably because of their diminished immune status. Often, small conjunctival masses are noted on routine eye examinations.
The examination of conjunctival SCC should determine the full extent of the lesion; rose Bengal dye is helpful for this evaluation. In addition, assess any suspicion for intraocular involvement via slit lamp examination, gonioscopy, and echography. Orbital involvement should be investigated with computed tomography (CT) scanning or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Unsuspected ocular surface neoplasia may be present within excised pterygia, and, for this reason, one study recommends the submission of all excised pterygia for histopathological analysis.[84]
Verrucous carcinoma of the head and neck most commonly occurs anywhere in the oral cavity but most frequently on the buccal mucosa. It is also found in the larynx. Outside of the head and neck region, the anogenital region is a common site. Because of these anatomic locations and because this neoplasm resembles virally induced warts, human papillomavirus (HPV) is frequently implicated in its genesis. Findings from sophisticated molecular studies confirm the viral etiology of many of these lesions.
Identifying high-risk lesions
Advanced-stage cutaneous SCC exhibits an aggressive clinical course with a greater likelihood of recurrence and cervical metastasis (see Prognosis). Therefore, recognition of these higher risk lesions and subsequent treatment by a qualified specialist is critical.
Lesions found on or around the ear have a 5-18% rate of metastatic spread, roughly 3 times the average rate. Those located in the preauricular region are particularly troublesome given their propensity to invade the parotid gland (see the image below). Cutaneous SCC of the lip also shows a high rate of nodal involvement. Therefore, prophylactic neck dissection for select cutaneous SCC located at these sites may be warranted.
Contrast-enhanced, axial computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient with soft-tissue invasion of the right parotid gland (arrow) by an ulcerative cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). As discussed in Prognosis, size is the most important determinant of outcome for patients with cutaneous SCC. Both the depth and width of the lesion influence the potential for recurrence and metastasis. Lesions larger than 2 cm have a higher rate of recurrence (15.2% vs 7.4%) and metastasis (30.3% vs 9.1%) than those smaller than 2 cm. Similarly, lesions that extend to a depth greater than 4 mm have a 45.7% rate of metastatic spread versus 6.7% for those less than 3 mm.
Cutaneous SCC that arises in immunocompromised patients has a high incidence of both initial and recurrent lesions, as well as has the potential for rapid growth and early metastatic spread. Some evidence suggests that these lesions metastasize at a more shallow depth and smaller width than those in nonimmunocompromised patients.
Definitions and Clinical Terminology
In this section, the following are reviewed briefly in relation to pathology:
- Keratosis
- Atypia and dysplasia
- Pleomorphism, anaplasia, and desmoplasia
- Leukoplakia
- Erythroplasia and erythroplakia
- Metaplasia
- Malignancy
- Carcinoma
Keratosis
Keratinization is the response of the squamous epithelium to physical trauma, which includes not only mechanical trauma but also thermal and chemical trauma. Wherever friction or exposure to other irritating stimuli are present, keratin deposition occurs at the surface. Therefore, skin is keratinized over most of its surface, but mucosal surfaces are selectively keratinized.
The dorsum of the tongue and the hard palate are subjected to masticatory stress, hot foods, noxious industrial vapors, dry air, and other stimuli. Therefore, these areas are always keratinized. Likewise, the linea alba, literally white line, is a horizontal line on both buccal mucosal surfaces. It corresponds to the bite line and is the response to frequent bite trauma of the buccal mucosa in the occlusal plane of teeth. The rest of the head and neck mucosa is not normally keratinized. However, physical trauma produces keratinization, which appears as a white line or patch in the area where the injury took place.
Any area is susceptible to this keratinization. Keratin is frequently seen on the vocal cords, epiglottis, soft palate, and anywhere the mucosa is exposed to physical stimuli.
The white patch is referred to clinically as leukoplakia. Of importance, this patch is not diagnostic of malignancy or even in situ carcinoma. The most abundant keratinization often overlies an entirely benign epithelium. It is reasonable to suppose that this keratinization protects the epithelium from the noxious stimuli and, therefore, no dysplasia has resulted.
Atypia and dysplasia
The 28th edition of Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, defines atypia as the condition of being irregular or not conforming to type; it defines dysplasia as abnormality of development.[85] In pathology, alteration is size, shape, and organization of adult cells. Empirically, most pathologists reserve the term atypia for individual cells and dysplasia for the cells and the organization or architecture of a structure.
The term atypia is largely applied with a focus on the nuclear details. Even when the term cytoplasm is invoked, it almost always refers to the size relationship of the cytoplasm to the nucleus, or the nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. Atypia of an individual cell refers to an enlarged nucleus (ie, an increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio), darkening of the nucleus (hyperchromasia), increased lobulation, angulation, or other geometric distortions of the nuclear outline. These phenomena are really just a reflection of increased DNA content (ie, polyploidy). Included in this category of nuclear atypia is the prominence of a nucleolus, intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions, and abnormal mitotic figures.
Dysplasia is almost always associated with individual cell atypia but not always. In one particular lesion of the salivary glands (eg, low-grade polymorphous adenocarcinoma) the cells are necessarily bland and monotonous, as defined by established criteria for the diagnosis. Only the architecture is polymorphous.
Architectural distortion ranges from hyperplasia, which is simply an increase in the number of cell layers seen at a particular anatomic site, to carcinoma in situ (CIS). This latter term, when used in the context of SCC of the head and neck, is virtually synonymous with severe dysplasia. Squamous CIS can and should be thought of as full-thickness atypia.
For decades, experienced pathologists have used the following trick to determine if CIS or moderate to severe dysplasia is present: The pathologist simply imagines the stroma to be nonexistent and focuses on only the epithelial-cell layers. If they cannot determine the top from the bottom by viewing the epithelium alone, the lesion is CIS, for this is truly full-thickness atypia. If, however elongated basal cells or flattened surface cells are present, these give away the original orientation, and the lesion is downgraded to moderate to severe dysplasia at most.
By convention, head and neck pathologists heavily rely on keratinization and mitotic figures to determine the degree of dysplasia. If a mitotic figure is observed halfway up the epithelial layers to the surface, full-thickness atypia is extremely likely.
Similarly, keratin should not be below the top 2-3 cell layers. Its presence lower than these layers is virtually always associated with full-thickness atypia nearby.
Pleomorphism, anaplasia, and desmoplasia
Pleomorphism is the term used for variance of the size, shape, and staining properties of cells with respect to their neighbors.
Anaplasia is the term applied to the most severe grades of pleomorphism. This term is used when the index cell (eg, the squamous cell) is no longer easily discernible. With anaplasia, the origin, type, and differentiation of the tumor are highly speculative. Simply put, the cells in anaplasia do not resemble their neighbors, and they do not even vaguely resemble any normal differentiated cells.
Desmoplasia is a fascinating phenomenon and an interesting word. Desmo is the Greek prefix for band or ligament, and plasia is the Greek term for molding. What is so intriguing about this term is that desmoplasia has numerous synonyms in medicine, because the ultimate outcome of many pathologic events in the body result in end-stage scarring—that is, a desmoplastic reaction.
The terms, scarring, fibrous deposition, sclerosis, desmoplasia, scirrhous reaction, and collagen deposition are all virtually interchangeable. In addition, other terms are frequently applied, especially with exuberant reactions involving collagen deposition. In essence, both hypertrophic scar and keloid formation are exaggerated desmoplastic reactions. These terms are frequently used to describe squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and really indicate a reaction to the tumor or therapy by the stromal cells. Desmoplasia is especially prominent after irradiation.
Leukoplakia
Taken literally, leukoplakia should be restricted to clinical use and not used in pathologic assessments. The term simply refers to a white patch on a mucous membrane that does not rub off. Glycogen and fungi can cause this clinical appearance. However, in most cases, this is the gross correlation to the microscopic finding of keratosis or hyperkeratosis. Keratosis refers to any deposition of keratin on a surface that is not normally keratinized, whereas hyperkeratosis is a somewhat subjective term that refers to excessive keratin deposition on a normally keratinized surface.
Leukoplakia is an indication that something is not right with the underlying epithelium. This something is not necessarily malignancy or even premalignancy. Although leukoplakia may be the first clinical presentation of a neoplastic process, it may also be a simple reaction to trauma, as in callus formation, or part of a mucocutaneous disease, as in some forms of psoriasis. The finding of leukoplakia should alert the clinician to examine the area. After that, the clinician can decide to order biopsy or not on the basis of the clinical setting.
Erythroplasia and erythroplakia
Both erythroplasia and erythroplakia have come into clinical use over the years. Erythroplasia is used far more frequently than erythroplakia; however, strictly speaking, these 2 terms are etymologically different. The 28th edition of Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary defines these terms as follows[85] : Erythroplasia is a condition of the mucous membrane characterized by erythematous papular lesions, and erythroplakia is a slow-growing, erythematous, velvety red lesion with well-defined margins occurring on a mucous membrane.
As is apparent, the erythroplakia involves observation over time. Practically speaking, the 2 terms refer to red patches. These are more often associated with dysplastic or neoplastic changes than is leukoplakia.
Once again, it is ultimately the clinician's decision to order biopsy or to watch. However, given the association of erythroplasia with neoplastic and preneoplastic change, the threshold to perform biopsy should be lowered in this context.
Metaplasia
Metaplasia is the change of an adult differentiated cell to a different type of an adult differentiated cell that is not normal in that location. In most cases in the head and neck, glandular or respiratory cells are undergoing metamorphosis to squamous cells.
Physical trauma, such as prolonged hot or cold thermal excesses causes metaplasia of the respiratory lining cells to squamous cells. Normal respiratory, ciliated columnar cells of the false vocal cords are not unusually lined by squamous cells instead. The stimulus that precipitates this event is typically known and may be exposure to industrial or natural noxious gases, heated air, or cigarette smoke. These cells are not definitely committed to undergo malignant degeneration. However, this process does suggest that some irritant is causing cellular change; therefore, investigation is merited.
The widely held notion that metaplasia is synonymous with simplification of the epithelium is untrue. Although ciliated, columnar, and mucus-secreting cells that are converting into squamous cells may be simplification, this is not always the case. In fact, chronic reflux with the concomitant exposure of esophageal squamous mucosa to gastric acids and enzymes produces the opposite result. The squamous cells evolve into mucous-secreting cells. Examples of this type of metaplasia occurring in the body are numerous. What the various forms of metaplasia have in common is that the cells change their type to one that is better suited than the former type to deal with the new environment.
Malignancy
Malignancy is surprisingly one of the most loosely defined terms in the field of oncology. Ask any group of medical students, residents, or attending physicians what this term means, and the variety of answers is startling. Given the essential importance of determining what is malignant and what is not simply underscores the need to clarify this term.
The terms metastatic, locally invasive, monoclonal, neoplastic, autonomous, and numerous others have been used to define malignancy. However, tumors can have some but not all of the properties of each type and thus easily refute the usefulness of these terms.
For example, most malignant brain tumors do not metastasize. Conversely, the entity benign metastasizing leiomyoma is an oxymoron if one considers metastases identical to malignancy. Endometriosis is another example in which tissue somehow metastasizes to a site distant from its origin. Therefore, it is best to think of the term malignant as Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary defines it[85] : (1) tending to become progressively worse and to result in death and (2) having the properties of anaplasia, invasion, and metastasis. The second half of the definition must be tempered with the understanding that not every malignant tumor possesses all of these features.
Therefore, the term malignancy is probably best understood as an empirical or working definition. Malignant tumors are those that continue to produce severe damage.
Carcinoma
Carcinoma is an epithelial malignancy. That is, it is epithelial tissue that causes severe damage. SCC causes local invasion, it becomes ulcerated, and it metastasizes to produce its damage. Basal cell carcinomas are locally invasive, and they become ulcerated, but they only rarely metastasize. Every head and neck surgeon is aware that, despite the lack of metastasis, these lesions can cause death by causing infection or by eroding the brain or other vital structures.
Histologic Nomenclature
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is an epithelial malignancy with morphologic features of squamous cell differentiation without additional features suggestive of other differentiated tissues. The features of squamous differentiation, observable on routine stained tissues under light microscopy, include one or more of the following: (1) flattened polyhedral, round, or ovoid epithelial cells; (2) intracellular or extracellular keratinization; and (3) intercellular bridges.
If features of spindle cell differentiation, glandular differentiation, or basal-cell differentiation are present with the squamous features just listed, the tumors are named to reflect these distinctive features (see the following image).
Squamous cell carcinoma with spindle cell elements illustrates the totipotential nature of epithelial-cell malignancies. The overall architecture is also included in the nomenclature of some select variants of SCC. Papillary carcinomas have cytologic features necessary for the lesions to be referred to as SCCs, but the unusual gross morphologic appearance and the microscopic architecture justifies special subcategorization.
The head and neck possesses more tissue types than any other comparably sized anatomic region. In the head and neck region, salivary glands, squamous epithelium, neural tissue, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, parathyroid tissue, thyroid tissue, ceruminous glands, sebaceous glands, sweat glands, retinal tissue, corneal tissue, lymphoid tissue and numerous other tissue types are all present in close proximity.
See Histologic Findings.
SCC Staging and Classification
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is staged according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union Against Cancer (UICC) guidelines, which use the "tumor, node, metastasis" (TNM) classification system.[58] This clinical staging system used for head and neck cancers is one that allows physicians to compare results across patients, assess prognosis, and design appropriate treatment regimens. The same system is employed for laryngeal tumors. The basic premise of these systems is that smaller cancers with no nodal disease have a better prognosis than a larger lesion with positive neck nodes.
The staging system previously classified tumor stage based solely on tumor diameter and invasion of deep structures (ie, cartilage, muscle, or bone). Along with tumor diameter, the new system incorporates high-risk features and incorporates information about tumor factors that influence prognosis (see Prognosis).Cutaneous SCC of the eyelid is excluded from the updated system.
High-risk tumor features include the following:
- Greater than 2 mm thickness or Clark level IV or higher
- Perineural invasion
- Primary anatomic location on the ear or non–hair-bearing lip
- Poorly differentiated or undifferentiated cellular histology
Primary tumor (T)
The T classification is as follows:
- TX - Primary tumor cannot be assessed (minimum requirements to assess primary tumor cannot be met).
- T0 - No evidence of primary tumor
- Tis - Carcinoma in situ (preinvasive cancer)
- T1 - Tumor 2 cm or smaller in greatest dimension and with 0 or 1 high-risk features
- T2 - Tumor larger than 2 cm but smaller than 4 cm in greatest dimension or with 2 or more high-risk features
- T3 - Tumor larger than 4 cm or involving facial bones (maxilla, mandible, orbit, or temporal
- T4 - Tumor invades deep extradermal structures (ie, extension to other bones, muscle, cartilage) or with perineural invasion involving the skull base
Regional lymph nodes (N)
The new TNM staging system also revised nodal staging. Previously, the system had only had a single N1 level to signify nodal involvement. The new system has 5 levels. The decision to stage patients according to extent of nodal disease was based on significant findings of several studies, both prospective and retrospective, showing that the number and size of lymph node involvement correlated with patient prognosis.[86, 87, 88, 89, 90]
In the new staging system, N1 disease involves a single ipsilateral node 3 cm or smaller in its largest dimension. N2a disease includes cases with a single ipsilateral node greater than 3 cm but less than or equal to 6 cm. N2b refers to those with multiple ipsilateral nodes smaller than or equal to 6 cm. N2c includes cases of bilateral or contralateral involvement less than or equal to 6 cm. N3 disease is reserved for cases with any involved node greater than 6 cm.
The N classification is as follows:
- NX - Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed (ie, minimum requirements to assess the regional nodes cannot be met
- N0 - No evidence of regional lymph node metastasis
- N1 - Regional lymph node metastases in a single ipsilateral lymph node and 3 cm or smaller in greatest dimension
- N2a - Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node larger than 3 cm but not larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension
- N2b - Metastasis in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension
- N2c - Metastasis in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension
- N3 - Metastasis in a lymph node larger than 6 cm in greatest dimension
In early 2010, Milross et al proposed an alternative nodal staging system (the N1S3), which also stages cutaneous SCC based on the number (single or multiple) and size (< or >3 cm) of lymph nodes involved, as well as incorporates the parotid as one of the regional levels, as follows[91] :
- Stage I nodal disease refers to those with a single lymph node measuring less than or equal to 3 cm.
- Stage II nodal disease includes cases with a single lymph node greater than 3 cm or multiple lymph nodes less than or equal to 3 cm,
- Stage III nodal disease consists of any patient with multiple lymph nodes greater than 3 cm.
Milross et al’s system was found to have a significant predictive capacity for locoregional control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival in a group of 215 patients and was reproduced on external validation in a cohort of 250 patients.[91]
Distant metastasis (M)
Distant metastases are staged according to the presence (M1) or absence (M0) of metastases in distant organs or sites outside of regional lymph nodes. This remains unchanged from the previous TNM staging system and is as follows:
- MX - Distant metastasis cannot be assessed (ie, minimum requirements to assess the presence of distant metastases cannot be met).
- M0 - No distant metastasis
- M1 - Distant metastasis
TNM Staging Classification
Stage 0 is equivalent with in situ disease. Disease stages I and II include patients with T1 and T2 tumors, respectively, who have no nodal or distant metastasis (N0, M0). Stage III disease includes T3 cases without nodal involvement (N0) or cases with N1 involvement. Stage IV includes those with T4 disease, or N2 or N3 disease, or distant metastasis (M1). The TNM staging classification is as follows (see also Table 2, below):
- Stage 0 - Tis/N0/M0
- Stage I - T1/N0/M0
- Stage II - T2/N0/M0
- Stage III - T3/N0/M0, T1/N1/M0, T2/N1/M0, or T3/N1/M0
- Stage IV - T4/N0, N1/M0; any T/N2, N3/M0; any T/any N/M1
Table 2. TNM Stage Grouping (Open Table in a new window)
| Stage | Primary Tumor | Regional Lymph Nodes | Distant Metastasis |
| Stage 0 | Tis | N0 | M0 |
| Stage I | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage II | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage III | T3 | N0 | M0 |
| T1, T2, T3 | N1 | M0 | |
| Stage IV | T4 | N0, N1 | M0 |
| Any T | N2, N3 | M0 | |
| Any T | Any N | M1 |
Johnson TM, Rowe DE, Nelson BR, Swanson NA. Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (excluding lip and oral mucosa). J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 1992;26(3 Pt 2):467-84. [Medline].
Salehi Z, Mashayekhi F, Shahosseini F. Significance of eIF4E expression in skin squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Biol Int. Nov 2007;31(11):1400-4. [Medline].
Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1992;26(6):976-90. [Medline].
Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schönfisch B, Trilling B, Wehner-Caroli J, Röcken M, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2008;9(8):713-20. [Medline].
Newman MD, Weinberg JM. Topical therapy in the treatment of actinic keratosis and basal cell carcinoma. Cutis. Apr 2007;79(4 Suppl):18-28. [Medline].
Katiyar SK. UV-induced immune suppression and photocarcinogenesis: chemoprevention by dietary botanical agents. Cancer Lett. Sep 18 2007;255(1):1-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffell DJ, Simon JA, Sharma HW, Kimmelman J, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature. Dec 22-29 1994;372(6508):773-6. [Medline].
Brash DE. Roles of the transcription factor p53 in keratinocyte carcinomas. Br J Dermatol. May 2006;154 Suppl 1:8-10. [Medline].
Brown VL, Harwood CA, Crook T, Cronin JG, Kelsell DP, Proby CM. p16INK4a and p14ARF tumor suppressor genes are commonly inactivated in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. May 2004;122(5):1284-92. [Medline].
Maclean H, Dhillon B, Ironside J. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb 1996;121(2):219-21. [Medline].
Maurer TA, Christian KV, Kerschmann RL, Berzin B, Palefsky JM, Payne D, et al. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. A study of epidemiologic risk factors, human papillomavirus, and p53 expression. Arch Dermatol. May 1997;133(5):577-83. [Medline].
Verma V, Shen D, Sieving PC, Chan CC. The role of infectious agents in the etiology of ocular adnexal neoplasia. Surv Ophthalmol. Jul-Aug 2008;53(4):312-31. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Gilberg SM, Tse DT. Malignant eyelid tumors. Ophthalmol Clin. 5:261-85.
de Gruijl FR, Rebel H. Early events in UV carcinogenesis--DNA damage, target cells and mutant p53 foci. Photochem Photobiol. Mar-Apr 2008;84(2):382-7. [Medline].
Perry PK, Silverberg NB. Cutaneous malignancy in albinism. Cutis. May 2001;67(5):427-30. [Medline].
Zghal M, El-Fekih N, Fazaa B, Fredj M, Zhioua R, Mokhtar I, et al. [Xeroderma pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular, and neurologic abnormalities in 49 Tunisian cases]. Tunis Med. Dec 2005;83(12):760-3. [Medline].
Berg D, Otley CC. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2002;47(1):1-17; quiz 18-20. [Medline].
Jensen P, Hansen S, Møller B, Leivestad T, Pfeffer P, Geiran O, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1999;40(2 Pt 1):177-86. [Medline].
Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Decullier E, Butnaru AC, Lefrançois N, Boissonnat P, et al. Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma. Transplantation. Apr 27 2006;81(8):1093-100. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Quinn DI, Ong CS, Keogh AM, Macdonald PS, Cooper SG, et al. Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience. Cancer. Apr 15 1999;85(8):1758-64. [Medline].
Black AP, Bailey A, Jones L, Turner RJ, Hollowood K, Ogg GS. p53-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in individuals with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. Nov 2005;153(5):987-91. [Medline].
Farshadpour F, Kranenborg H, Calkoen EV, et al. Survival analysis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Influence of smoking and drinking. Head Neck. Jun 2011;33(6):817-23. [Medline].
Wong SS, Tan KC, Goh CL. Cutaneous manifestations of chronic arsenicism: review of seventeen cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1998;38(2 Pt 1):179-85. [Medline].
Mallipeddi R. Epidermolysis bullosa and cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. Nov 2002;27(8):616-23. [Medline].
Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Li KP, Suchindran C. Epidermolysis bullosa and the risk of life-threatening cancers: the National EB Registry experience, 1986-2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 2009;60(2):203-11. [Medline].
Reed WB, College J Jr, Francis MJ, Zachariae H, Mohs F, Sher MA, et al. Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica with epidermal neoplasms. Arch Dermatol. Dec 1974;110(6):894-902. [Medline].
Mallipeddi R, Keane FM, McGrath JA, Mayou BJ, Eady RA. Increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. Sep 2004;18(5):521-6. [Medline].
Arbiser JL, Fan CY, Su X, Van Emburgh BO, Cerimele F, Miller MS, et al. Involvement of p53 and p16 tumor suppressor genes in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-associated squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. Oct 2004;123(4):788-90. [Medline].
Chang F, Syrjänen S, Kellokoski J, Syrjänen K. Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and their associations with oral disease. J Oral Pathol Med. Aug 1991;20(7):305-17. [Medline].
Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and neck cancer: changing epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. Apr 2008;83(4):489-501. [Medline].
Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens--Part B: biological agents. Lancet Oncol. Apr 2009;10(4):321-2. [Medline].
Stockfleth E, Nindl I, Sterry W, Ulrich C, Schmook T, Meyer T. Human papillomaviruses in transplant-associated skin cancers. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2004;30(4 Pt 2):604-9. [Medline].
Alam M, Caldwell JB, Eliezri YD. Human papillomavirus-associated digital squamous cell carcinoma: literature review and report of 21 new cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2003;48(3):385-93. [Medline].
Della Torre G, Donghi R, Longoni A, Pilotti S, Pasquini G, De Palo G, et al. HPV DNA in intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma of the vulva and penis. Diagn Mol Pathol. Mar 1992;1(1):25-30. [Medline].
Lobo DV, Chu P, Grekin RC, Berger TG. Nonmelanoma skin cancers and infection with the human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Dermatol. May 1992;128(5):623-7. [Medline].
Nguyen P, Vin-Christian K, Ming ME, Berger T. Aggressive squamous cell carcinomas in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Arch Dermatol. Jun 2002;138(6):758-63. [Medline].
Karagas MR, Nelson HH, Zens MS, Linet M, Stukel TA, Spencer S, et al. Squamous cell and basal cell carcinoma of the skin in relation to radiation therapy and potential modification of risk by sun exposure. Epidemiology. Nov 2007;18(6):776-84. [Medline].
Faustina M, Diba R, Ahmadi MA, Esmaeli B. Patterns of regional and distant metastasis in patients with eyelid and periocular squamous cell carcinoma. Ophthalmology. Oct 2004;111(10):1930-2. [Medline].
Howard GR, Nerad JA, Carter KD, Whitaker DC. Clinical characteristics associated with orbital invasion of cutaneous basal cell and squamous cell tumors of the eyelid. Am J Ophthalmol. Feb 15 1992;113(2):123-33. [Medline].
Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer--the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;624:89-103. [Medline].
Masini C, Fuchs PG, Gabrielli F, Stark S, Sera F, Ploner M, et al. Evidence for the association of human papillomavirus infection and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in immunocompetent individuals. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2003;139(7):890-4. [Medline].
Herman S, Rogers HD, Ratner D. Immunosuppression and squamous cell carcinoma: a focus on solid organ transplant recipients. Skinmed. Sep-Oct 2007;6(5):234-8. [Medline].
Mehrany K, Weenig RH, Pittelkow MR, Roenigk RK, Otley CC. High recurrence rates of squamous cell carcinoma after Mohs' surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2005;31(1):38-42; discussion 42. [Medline].
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Human papillomaviruses. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2007;90:1-636. [Medline].
Harper JG, Pilcher MF, Szlam S, Lind DS. Squamous cell carcinoma in an African American with discoid lupus erythematosus: a case report and review of the literature. South Med J. Mar 2010;103(3):256-9. [Medline].
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures: 2004. Accessed February 2, 2011. Available at http://ww2.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF_finalPWSecured.pdf.
Hampton T. Skin cancer's ranks rise: immunosuppression to blame. JAMA. Sep 28 2005;294(12):1476-80. [Medline].
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Murray T, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2008;58(2):71-96. [Medline].
Gray DT, Suman VJ, Su WP, Clay RP, Harmsen WS, Roenigk RK. Trends in the population-based incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin first diagnosed between 1984 and 1992. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1997;133(6):735-40. [Medline].
Mehta M, Fay A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid and conjunctiva. Int Ophthalmol Clin. Winter 2009;49(1):111-21. [Medline].
Reifler DM, Hornblass A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Surv Ophthalmol. May-Jun 1986;30(6):349-65. [Medline].
KWITKO ML, BONIUK M, ZIMMERMAN LE. Eyelid tumors with reference to lesions confused with squamous cell carcinoma. I. Incidence and errors in diagnosis. Arch Ophthalmol. Jun 1963;69:693-7. [Medline].
McCarty JH, Barry M, Crowley D, Bronson RT, Lacy-Hulbert A, Hynes RO. Genetic ablation of alphav integrins in epithelial cells of the eyelid skin and conjunctiva leads to squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol. Jun 2008;172(6):1740-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Doxanas MT, Iliff WJ, Iliff NT, Green WR. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelids. Ophthalmology. May 1987;94(5):538-41. [Medline].
Buettner PG, Raasch BA. Incidence rates of skin cancer in Townsville, Australia. Int J Cancer. Nov 23 1998;78(5):587-93. [Medline].
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2005;55(2):74-108. [Medline].
McCall CO, Chen SC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the legs in African Americans. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 2002;47(4):524-9. [Medline].
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, eds. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and other cutaneous carcinomas. In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009:301-9.
Palme CE, MacKay SG, Kalnins I, Morgan GJ, Veness MJ. The need for a better prognostic staging system in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Apr 2007;15(2):103-6. [Medline].
Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess S, Berg D, Schmults CD. Equipoise exists in the peri-operative management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: A survey study of American College of Mohs Surgery surgeons. Manuscript under review.
Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, Zhou X, Duvic M, El-Naggar AK, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2005;23(4):759-65. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope. May 2005;115(5):870-5. [Medline].
Ross AS, Schmults CD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the English literature. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2006;32(11):1309-21. [Medline].
Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an incidence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology. Apr 1999;106(4):746-50. [Medline].
Dailey JR, Kennedy RH, Flaharty PM, Eagle RC Jr, Flanagan JC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1994;10(3):153-9. [Medline].
Thosani MK, Schneck G, Jones EC. Periocular squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. May 2008;34(5):585-99. [Medline].
Bowyer JD, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead KJ, Kelly LE, Allison RW. The management of perineural spread of squamous cell carcinoma to the ocular adnexae. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 2003;19(4):275-81. [Medline].
Donaldson MJ, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead KJ, Williamson RM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelids. Br J Ophthalmol. Oct 2002;86(10):1161-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Fleming MD, Hunt JL, Purdue GF, Sandstad J. Marjolin's ulcer: a review and reevaluation of a difficult problem. J Burn Care Rehabil. Sep-Oct 1990;11(5):460-9. [Medline].
Møller R, Reymann F, Hou-Jensen K. Metastases in dermatological patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1979;115(6):703-5. [Medline].
Novick M, Gard DA, Hardy SB, Spira M. Burn scar carcinoma: a review and analysis of 46 cases. J Trauma. Oct 1977;17(10):809-17. [Medline].
Kowal-Vern A, Criswell BK. Burn scar neoplasms: a literature review and statistical analysis. Burns. Jun 2005;31(4):403-13. [Medline].
Ross AS, Whalen FM, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Troxel AB, Schmults CD. Diameter of involved nerves predicts outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigator-blinded retrospective cohort study. Dermatol Surg. Dec 2009;35(12):1859-66. [Medline].
Frierson HF Jr, Deutsch BD, Levine PA. Clinicopathologic features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Hum Pathol. Dec 1988;19(12):1397-402. [Medline].
Straif K, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan R, Grosse Y, Secretan B, El Ghissassi F, et al. A review of human carcinogens--part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. Lancet Oncol. May 2009;10(5):453-4. [Medline].
Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM. Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 15 2001;49(4):1061-9. [Medline].
Robinson JW, Brownstein S, Jordan DR, Hodge WG. Conjunctival mucoepidermoid carcinoma in a patient with ocular cicatricial pemphigoid and a review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. Sep-Oct 2006;51(5):513-9. [Medline].
Türegün M, Nisanci M, Güler M. Burn scar carcinoma with longer lag period arising in previously grafted area. Burns. Sep 1997;23(6):496-7. [Medline].
Moy RL, Eliezri YD, Nuovo GJ, Zitelli JA, Bennett RG, Silverstein S. Human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in periungual squamous cell carcinomas. JAMA. May 12 1989;261(18):2669-73. [Medline].
Barros JN, Lowen MS, Ballalai PL, Mascaro VL, Gomes JA, Martins MC. Predictive index to differentiate invasive squamous cell carcinoma from preinvasive ocular surface lesions by impression cytology. Br J Ophthalmol. Feb 2009;93(2):209-14. [Medline].
Pe'er J. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. Mar 2005;18(1):1-13, vii. [Medline].
Papaioannou IT, Melachrinou MP, Drimtzias EG, Gartaganis SP. Corneal-conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma. Cornea. Sep 2008;27(8):957-8. [Medline].
Gökmen Soysal H, Ardiç F. Malignant conjunctival tumors invading the orbit. Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(5):338-43. [Medline].
Hirst LW, Axelsen RA, Schwab I. Pterygium and associated ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Arch Ophthalmol. Jan 2009;127(1):31-2. [Medline].
Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary. 28th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1994.
O'Brien CJ, McNeil EB, McMahon JD, Pathak I, Lauer CS, Jackson MA. Significance of clinical stage, extent of surgery, and pathologic findings in metastatic cutaneous squamous carcinoma of the parotid gland. Head Neck. May 2002;24(5):417-22. [Medline].
Palme CE, O'Brien CJ, Veness MJ, McNeil EB, Bron LP, Morgan GJ. Extent of parotid disease influences outcome in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 2003;129(7):750-3. [Medline].
Andruchow JL, Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Gao K, Clifford A, Shannon KF, et al. Implications for clinical staging of metastatic cutaneous squamous carcinoma of the head and neck based on a multicenter study of treatment outcomes. Cancer. Mar 1 2006;106(5):1078-83. [Medline].
Audet N, Palme CE, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW, Brown DH, Irish J, et al. Cutaneous metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland: analysis and outcome. Head Neck. Aug 2004;26(8):727-32. [Medline].
Ch'ng S, Maitra A, Allison RS, Chaplin JM, Gregor RT, Lea R, et al. Parotid and cervical nodal status predict prognosis for patients with head and neck metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. Aug 1 2008;98(2):101-5. [Medline].
Forest VI, Clark JJ, Veness MJ, Milross C. N1S3: a revised staging system for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases: results of 2 Australian Cancer Centers. Cancer. Mar 1 2010;116(5):1298-304. [Medline].
Lin LF, Chang CY, Cherng SC. Advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the bulbar conjunctiva seen on PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. Dec 2008;33(12):929-30. [Medline].
Dammann F, Horger M, Mueller-Berg M, Schlemmer H, Claussen CD, Hoffman J, et al. Rational diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region: comparative evaluation of CT, MRI, and 18FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 2005;184(4):1326-31. [Medline].
Land R, Herod J, Moskovic E, King M, Sohaib SA, Trott P, et al. Routine computerized tomography scanning, groin ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration cytology in the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer. Jan-Feb 2006;16(1):312-7. [Medline].
Cho SB, Chung WG, Yun M, Lee JD, Lee MG, Chung KY. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: retrospective analysis of 12 patients. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2005;31(4):442-6; discussion 446-7. [Medline].
Gündüz K, Hosal BM, Zilelioglu G, Günalp I. The use of ultrasound biomicroscopy in the evaluation of anterior segment tumors and simulating conditions. Ophthalmologica. 2007;221(5):305-12. [Medline].
Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, Smith N, Klein RQ, Schmults CD. Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2009;35(4):574-85. [Medline].
Tan PY, Ek E, Su S, Giorlando F, Dieu T. Incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: a prospective observational study. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 15 2007;120(4):910-6. [Medline].
Holmkvist KA, Roenigk RK. Squamous cell carcinoma of the lip treated with Mohs micrographic surgery: outcome at 5 years. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1998;38(6 Pt 1):960-6. [Medline].
Rudkin AK, Muecke JS. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of localised ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. Jul 2011;95(7):947-50. [Medline].
Harwood CA, Leedham-Green M, Leigh IM, Proby CM. Low-dose retinoids in the prevention of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients: a 16-year retrospective study. Arch Dermatol. Apr 2005;141(4):456-64. [Medline].
Char DH, Crawford JB. Orbital invasion despite topical anti-metabolite therapy for conjunctival carcinoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Mar 2008;246(3):459-61. [Medline].
Shields CL, Demirci H, Marr BP, Masheyekhi A, Materin M, Shields JA. Chemoreduction with topical mitomycin C prior to resection of extensive squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. Jan 2005;123(1):109-13. [Medline].
Russell HC, Chadha V, Lockington D, Kemp EG. Topical mitomycin C chemotherapy in the management of ocular surface neoplasia: a 10-year review of treatment outcomes and complications. Br J Ophthalmol. Oct 2010;94(10):1316-21. [Medline].
Bargman H, Hochman J. Topical treatment of Bowen's disease with 5-Fluorouracil. J Cutan Med Surg. Mar-Apr 2003;7(2):101-5. [Medline].
Rosen T, Harting M, Gibson M. Treatment of Bowen's disease with topical 5% imiquimod cream: retrospective study. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2007;33(4):427-31; discussion 431-2. [Medline].
Mackenzie-Wood A, Kossard S, de Launey J, Wilkinson B, Owens ML. Imiquimod 5% cream in the treatment of Bowen's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. Mar 2001;44(3):462-70. [Medline].
Smith KJ, Hamza S, Skelton H. Topical imidazoquinoline therapy of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma polarizes lymphoid and monocyte/macrophage populations to a Th1 and M1 cytokine pattern. Clin Exp Dermatol. Sep 2004;29(5):505-12. [Medline].
Perrett CM, McGregor JM, Warwick J, Karran P, Leigh IM, Proby CM, et al. Treatment of post-transplant premalignant skin disease: a randomized intrapatient comparative study of 5-fluorouracil cream and topical photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol. Feb 2007;156(2):320-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Willey A, Mehta S, Lee PK. Reduction in the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients treated with cyclic photodynamic therapy. Dermatol Surg. May 2010;36(5):652-8. [Medline].
Marmur ES, Schmults CD, Goldberg DJ. A review of laser and photodynamic therapy for the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. Feb 2004;30(2 Pt 2):264-71. [Medline].
Rossi R, Puccioni M, Mavilia L, Campolmi P, Mori M, Cappuccini A, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid treated with photodynamic therapy. J Chemother. Jun 2004;16(3):306-9. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Brewster AM, Lee JJ, Clayman GL, Clifford JL, Reyes MJ, Zhou X, et al. Randomized trial of adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alfa for patients with aggressive skin squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. May 20 2007;25(15):1974-8. [Medline].
Braathen LR, Szeimies RM, Basset-Seguin N, Bissonnette R, Foley P, Pariser D, et al. Guidelines on the use of photodynamic therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer: an international consensus. International Society for Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology, 2005. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 2007;56(1):125-43. [Medline].
Rio E, Bardet E, Ferron C, Peuvrel P, Supiot S, Campion L, et al. Interstitial brachytherapy of periorificial skin carcinomas of the face: a retrospective study of 97 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Nov 1 2005;63(3):753-7. [Medline].
Veness M, Richards S. Role of modern radiotherapy in treating skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol. Aug 2003;44(3):159-66; quiz 167-8. [Medline].
Wollina U, Hansel G, Koch A, Köstler E. Oral capecitabine plus subcutaneous interferon alpha in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. May 2005;131(5):300-4. [Medline].
Bauman JE, Eaton KD, Martins RG. Treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with cetuximab. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2007;143(7):889-92. [Medline].
Suen JK, Bressler L, Shord SS, Warso M, Villano JL. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma responding serially to single-agent cetuximab. Anticancer Drugs. Aug 2007;18(7):827-9. [Medline].
Arnold AW, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Zuger C, Itin PH. Cetuximab therapy of metastasizing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with severe recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatology. 2009;219(1):80-3. [Medline].
Hitt R, Jimeno A, Rodríguez-Pinilla M, Rodríguez-Peralto JL, Millán JM, López-Martín A, et al. Phase II trial of cisplatin and capecitabine in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and correlative study of angiogenic factors. Br J Cancer. Dec 13 2004;91(12):2005-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Bentzen JD, Hansen HS. Phase II analysis of paclitaxel and capecitabine in the treatment of recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Head Neck. Jan 2007;29(1):47-51. [Medline].
Kim JG, Sohn SK, Kim DH, Baek JH, Jeon SB, Chae YS, et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer. Nov 14 2005;93(10):1117-21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris RL. Head and neck cancer. Lancet. May 17 2008;371(9625):1695-709. [Medline].
Otley CC, Cherikh WS, Salasche SJ, McBride MA, Christenson LJ, Kauffman HM. Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: effect of pretransplant end-organ disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2005;53(5):783-90. [Medline].
Abou Ayache R, Thierry A, Bridoux F, Bauwens M, Belmouaz M, Desport E, et al. Long-term maintenance of calcineurin inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk for squamous cell carcinomas after kidney transplantation compared with bi- or tritherapy. Transplant Proc. Oct 2007;39(8):2592-4. [Medline].
Schena FP, Pascoe MD, Alberu J, del Carmen Rial M, Oberbauer R, Brennan DC, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. Jan 27 2009;87(2):233-42. [Medline].
Rival-Tringali AL, Euvrard S, Decullier E, Claudy A, Faure M, Kanitakis J. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus reduces vascularization and thickness of post-transplant cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Anticancer Res. Jun 2009;29(6):1927-32. [Medline].
Graham GF, Clark LC. Statistical analysis in cryosurgery of skin cancer. Clin Dermatol. Jan-Mar 1990;8(1):101-7. [Medline].
Kuflik EG, Gage AA. The five-year cure rate achieved by cryosurgery for skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1991;24(6 Pt 1):1002-4. [Medline].
Matsuo T, Ohara N, Namba Y, Koshima I, Ida K, Kanazawa S. Ophthalmic artery embolization as pretreatment of orbital exenteration for conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. May 2009;32(3):554-7. [Medline].
Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1992;27(2 Pt 1):241-8. [Medline].
Mohs FE. Micrographic surgery for the microscopically controlled excision of eyelid cancers. Arch Ophthalmol. Jun 1986;104(6):901-9. [Medline].
Seidler AM, Bramlette TB, Washington CV, Szeto H, Chen SC. Mohs versus traditional surgical excision for facial and auricular nonmelanoma skin cancer: an analysis of cost-effectiveness. Dermatol Surg. Nov 2009;35(11):1776-87. [Medline].
Rogers HW, Coldiron BM. A relative value unit-based cost comparison of treatment modalities for nonmelanoma skin cancer: effect of the loss of the Mohs multiple surgery reduction exemption. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jul 2009;61(1):96-103. [Medline].
Robins P, Dzubow LM, Rigel DS. Squamous-cell carcinoma treated by Mohs' surgery: an experience with 414 cases in a period of 15 years. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Oct 1981;7(10):800-1. [Medline].
Bischoff JR, Kirn DH, Williams A, Heise C, Horn S, Muna M, et al. An adenovirus mutant that replicates selectively in p53-deficient human tumor cells. Science. Oct 18 1996;274(5286):373-6. [Medline].
Roman S, Lindeman R, O'Toole G, Poole MD. Gene therapy in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Curr Gene Ther. Feb 2005;5(1):81-99. [Medline].
Rea S, O'Sullivan ST. The polymerase chain reaction and its application to clinical plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(2):113-21. [Medline].
Lee BJ, Wang SG, Choi JS, Lee JC, Goh EK, Kim MG. The prognostic value of telomerase expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of head and neck cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol. Apr 2006;29(2):163-7. [Medline].
Haddad R. Current and future directions in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: multidisciplinary symposium on head and neck cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. Apr 2006;10(2):333-6. [Medline].
Seité S, Colige A, Piquemal-Vivenot P, Montastier C, Fourtanier A, Lapière C, et al. A full-UV spectrum absorbing daily use cream protects human skin against biological changes occurring in photoaging. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. Aug 2000;16(4):147-55. [Medline].
Séite S, Moyal D, Richard S, de Rigal J, Lévêque JL, Hourseau C, et al. Mexoryl SX: a broad absorption UVA filter protects human skin from the effects of repeated suberythemal doses of UVA. J Photochem Photobiol B. Jun 15 1998;44(1):69-76. [Medline].
Chen K, Craig JC, Shumack S. Oral retinoids for the prevention of skin cancers in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Dermatol. Mar 2005;152(3):518-23. [Medline].
Mrass P, Rendl M, Mildner M, Gruber F, Lengauer B, Ballaun C, et al. Retinoic acid increases the expression of p53 and proapoptotic caspases and sensitizes keratinocytes to apoptosis: a possible explanation for tumor preventive action of retinoids. Cancer Res. Sep 15 2004;64(18):6542-8. [Medline].
Papoutsaki M, Lanza M, Marinari B, Nisticò S, Moretti F, Levrero M, et al. The p73 gene is an anti-tumoral target of the RARbeta/gamma-selective retinoid tazarotene. J Invest Dermatol. Dec 2004;123(6):1162-8. [Medline].
Miller DL, Weinstock MA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol. May 1994;30(5 Pt 1):774-8. [Medline].
- Table 1. Estimated Number of New Cancer Cases and Deaths in Both Sexes in the United States in 2004
- Table 2. TNM Stage Grouping
- Table 3. Histologic and Clinical Features of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) Variants
- Table 4. Summary of Characteristics of Papillary Epithelial Lesions and Verrucous Carcinoma
| Cancer | New Cases | Deaths |
| Oral cavity and pharynx | 28,260 | 7230 |
| Tongue | 7320 | 1700 |
| Mouth | 10,080 | 1890 |
| Pharynx | 8250 | 2070 |
| Other oral cavity | 2160 | 1570 |
| Larynx | 10,270 | 3830 |
| Source: American Cancer Society, 2004.[46] Note: The US Census Bureau estimated that the US population was approximately 282,000,000. | ||
| Stage | Primary Tumor | Regional Lymph Nodes | Distant Metastasis |
| Stage 0 | Tis | N0 | M0 |
| Stage I | T1 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage II | T2 | N0 | M0 |
| Stage III | T3 | N0 | M0 |
| T1, T2, T3 | N1 | M0 | |
| Stage IV | T4 | N0, N1 | M0 |
| Any T | N2, N3 | M0 | |
| Any T | Any N | M1 |
| Tumor | Histologic Characteristics | Clinical Characteristics |
| Keratoacanthoma | Keratin-filled crater Well-differentiated (mild atypia) Neutrophil microabscesses Eosinophils in dermal infiltrate Elastic tissue trapping Lack of acantholysis | Solitary nodule Central craterlike depression Rapid growth May spontaneously involute |
| Spindle cell carcinoma | Atypical spindle cells Foci of squamous differentiation May resemble other spindle cell tumors (eg, atypical fibroxanthoma) | Resembles typical SCC May be clinically aggressive |
| Acantholytic (adenoid) SCC | Glandlike differentiation Acantholysis May resemble adenocarcinoma or sweat gland carcinoma | Arises on sun-damaged skin Elderly patients Resembles typical SCC Clinically aggressive |
| Verrucous carcinoma | Well-differentiated (glassy atypia) Surface resembles verruca Bulbous downward proliferation "Bulldozing" invasion | Oral, genital, or plantar foot Indolent growth Locally destructive Rarely metastasizes |
| Sarcomatoid SCC | Poorly differentiated cells resembling sarcoma | Clinical appearance may be that of typical SCC or may have more nodular appearance with less surface change Elevated risk of local recurrence and metastasis |
| Tumor | Epithelium | Invasion and Inflammation |
| Benign squamous papilloma | Minimal to no epithelial atypia without any stromal invasion | No inflammation in stroma; no epithelial cells, nests, or broad fronts in stroma |
| Papillary SCCIS | Full-thickness epithelial atypia without invasion | No invasive epithelial component in stroma; minimal inflammatory reaction |
| Papillary SCC, invasive | Epithelial atypia, which may or may not be full thickness, overlying stromal invasion; invasion occurs by means of elongated, stabbing fronts, small nests or individual cells | Pointed, narrow epithelium extending into stroma, with epithelial nests and/or individual cells surrounded by inflammatory cells, which may be eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, plasma cells, and/or lymphocytes in any combination |
| Verrucous carcinoma | Bland, highly keratinized, squamous epithelium, with invasion in broad, rounded, pushing fronts | No individual cells or squamous nests in stroma; advanced portion of the epithelial pushing front surrounded by tightly hugging infiltrate of mononuclear inflammatory cells |

