Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treatment & Management
- Author: Talib Najjar, DMD, MDS, PhD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA more...
Low-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) on the trunk and extremities can be treated with electrodessication and curettage (ED&C). For invasive cSCC, surgical excision and Mohs micrographic surgery are the primary treatment options; with appropriate patient selection, these techniques have comparable cure rates. Radiation therapy is typically used as an adjuvant to surgery, to provide improved locoregional control, but it may be used as primary therapy in patients who are unable to undergo surgical excision.
Chemotherapy may be considered as adjuvant therapy in select highest-risk cases of cSCC. In particular, emerging evidence suggests that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors may be useful adjuncts to surgical treatment. Systemic chemotherapy may be considered for metastatic cSCC.
Prevention is an important aspect of managing cSCC. Given the central role that ultraviolet radiation (UVR) plays in the pathogenesis of cSCC, methods aimed at decreasing UVR exposure form the cornerstone of cSCC prevention. Several effective treatment modalities exist for precancerous skin lesions, including carcinoma in situ and actinic keratosis. Most of these treatments are easily performed in an outpatient setting.
Electrodessication and Curettage
ED&C is a simple technique that can be used to treat localized, superficial cSCC. This procedure destroys the tumor and a surrounding margin of clinically unaffected tissue via cauterization and scraping of the area with a curette. The process is repeated several times to maximize the probability of complete tumor extirpation.
The technique is based on the delineation of tumor margins with a curette, because tumor tissue is generally more friable than the surrounding normal tissue. ED&C is known to be very technique dependent, and cure rates improve with a practitioner's experience.
The thick scars that often occur after ED&C can delay the diagnosis of cancer recurrence. Consequently, ED&C should be used with caution in invasive cSCC. The procedure is not appropriate for certain anatomic locations (ie, eyelids, genitalia, lips, ears).
The main disadvantage of ED&C is that no specimen is available for margin evaluation, and most dermatologic surgeons believe the actual long-term cure rate for invasive SCC is much lower than that quoted in the literature. Nevertheless, the 5-year cure rates for small primary cSCC may be as high as 96%. Cure rates for high-risk tumors are much lower, although no well-controlled, prospective studies have been performed.
Tumor recurrence may result from failure of ED&C treatment to eradicate atypical cells residing deep in the hair follicles or in the dermis. Nonetheless, the procedure is fast, minimally invasive, well tolerated, and effective for properly selected lesions.
Standard excision with conventional permanent (ie, paraffin-embedded) tissue sections is a highly effective and well-tolerated therapy for primary cSCCs that lack high-risk features and are located in areas where tissue sparing is not critical. Surgical excision offers the advantages of histologic verification of tumor margins, rapid healing, and improved cosmesis.
Cure rates following simple excision of well-defined T1 lesions may be as high as 95-99%. The generally accepted 5-year cure rate for primary tumors treated with standard excision is 92%; this rate drops to 77% for recurrent cSCC.
A 4-mm margin of healthy tissue is recommended for lower-risk lesions. In this category are well-differentiated tumors smaller than 2 cm in diameter that do not occur on the scalp, ears, eyelids, lips, or nose and do not involve subcutaneous fat. Therefore, simple excision is most valuable in the treatment of small primary SCCs on the trunk, extremities, or neck, where tissue sparing is less essential. Recurrence rates after the excision of low-risk lesions range from 5% to 8%.
A 6-mm margin of healthy tissue is recommended for lesions that are larger than 2 cm, invasive to fat, or in high-risk locations (ie, central face, ears, scalp, genitalia, hands, feet). Given the cosmetic and functional impact of these wider margins, tumors in this latter category are often removed via Mohs surgery to achieve high cure rates while sparing normal tissue. The depth of an excision should always include a portion of the subcutaneous fat.
No large randomized studies have addressed the issue of appropriate margin size in cSCC, as has been done for melanoma. The recommendations for margin size should be taken only as rough guidelines, with the understanding that large, aggressive lesions frequently have substantial extension beyond the apparent superficial boundary. Therefore, a surgeon’s experience and judgment in planning surgical margins is paramount to the successful treatment of cSCC.
Complications of excision include hematoma, seroma, infection, and wound dehiscence. Furthermore, histologic margins can be reported as negative when they are, in fact, positive (false negative), because the traditional bread-loaf method of tissue sectioning typically results in evaluation of less than 1% of the specimen’s margins. For this reason, cure rates for cSCC following excision do not significantly differ from cure rates following ED&C and may even be somewhat lower.
For patients at risk for metastatic spread to lymph nodes, the standard treatment is surgical excision of the primary lesion along with the involved lymph node basins. Skin cancers located in the periauricular region, frontotemporal scalp, and mid-face often drain via lymph nodes in the parotid gland. Consequently, the parotid is the most frequently involved site of metastatic spread. In cases that involve parotid involvement, a parotidectomy with or without a simultaneous neck dissection is the procedure of choice.
Mohs micrographic surgery
Mohs micrographic surgery is a specialized technique for removing many forms of skin cancer, including cSCC. Because of its numerous advantages, Mohs micrographic surgery is the procedure of choice in the following situations:
SCC in which tissue preservation is needed
Mohs surgery, which was developed by Frederic E. Mohs in the 1930s, is a method of tumor excision in which the surgeon first excises the visible tumor with a small margin of normal tissue. Horizontal frozen sections are then prepared, and the entire margin is evaluated under the microscope. Areas that demonstrate residual microscopic tumor involvement are re-excised, and the margins are reexamined. This cycle is completed until no further tumor is visualized.
The main advantage of this procedure over simple excision is the ability to histologically examine nearly 100% of the surgical margins (as compared with < 1% of the margin visualized via standard histologic sectioning) and to carefully map residual foci of invasive carcinoma, making incomplete excision much less likely than with standard pathologic processing.
In addition, the excised specimens are managed in a way that maintains orientation relative to the operative site. Consequently, Mohs surgery offers tissue sparing, which facilitates small, minimally disfiguring reconstructions of the resulting defects. Thus, it is considered ideal for removing small lesions on the face.
However, Mohs surgery is time consuming and highly dependent on technique. Moreover, it is ill suited for large, aggressive, or recurrent cSCC, in which the risk of recurrence or regional metastasis is high. In those cases, en bloc surgical excision is the standard method of treatment.
Radiation therapy as primary treatment for cSCC is typically reserved for patients who are unable to undergo surgical excision. More frequently, radiation therapy is used as an adjuvant to surgery for improved locoregional control. Postoperative radiotherapy is considered for tumors that exhibit perineural invasion or other high-risk features and for those that involve regional metastasis.
No comparative studies of surgery versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk SCC have been performed. With no clear evidence of benefit and the potential of significant morbidity, clinical judgment is required in deciding which patients should receive adjuvant radiation. One systematic review suggests that adjuvant radiation be considered in patients with uncertain or positive surgical margins or advanced nerve involvement.
Adjuvant medication may be considered in select highest-risk cases of cSCC. Options include oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Treatment should be administered through oncology treatment centers. Although survival data are lacking, these medications are generally well tolerated, with few adverse effects.
One study found that the use of topical 5-FU 1% is effective as an adjuvant to surgical excision in treating patients with localized ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Although frequent short-term complications were noted, a low rate of local recurrence was found; a full course is usually tolerated, and serious complications in the study were uncommon.
A variety of different chemotherapeutic agents have been used to treat metastatic cSCC. Although many of these agents have an established role in chemotherapy for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, high-quality data is frequently lacking for their use in cSCC. Among the most common nontargeted agents used in cSCC are cisplatin and carboplatin, 5-FU, and taxanes.
Cetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits EGFR, has been reported as successful in multiple case reports[65, 66, 67, 68] High-quality studies examining these agents in high-risk cSCC are needed.
Treatment of Conjunctival Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Excisional biopsy is the treatment of choice for conjunctival SCC. For extremely large lesions, incisional biopsy may be performed. However, strict notation of the biopsy site and minimal handling of the surrounding tissues are imperative to prevent seeding of the tumor. Surgical excision is best performed under the operating microscope.
Removal of a cuff of normal conjunctival tissue surrounding the lesion is prudent, and an episclerectomy at the base of the lesion is also advisable if it is adherent to the sclera, in order to remove any superficial cells infiltrating the sclera.
Involved corneal tissues may be best removed following treatment with 100% ethanol. The tissues superficial to the Bowman layer are removed easily in a single sheet, which is sent to the laboratory for analysis. Care should be taken not to incise into the Bowman membrane.
Cryotherapy is performed, in a double freeze-thaw manner, to the edges of the uninvolved conjunctiva and Tenon capsule. It also can be applied to the involved limbal area. The exposed sclera occasionally is treated with 100% ethanol to devitalize any remaining tumor cells. All excised tissues are submitted for histopathologic analysis.
Reconstruction is performed with direct closure, local flaps, or free conjunctival grafts. Extensive lesions with orbital involvement require exenteration.
Radiation therapy may be used as adjunctive therapy in cases of extensive lesions with poorly defined margins and as palliative therapy in cases in which the patient cannot tolerate extensive surgery.
Conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia
Topical cytotoxic therapy (ie, 5-FU, mitomycin C [MMC]) has been used to treat conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia and to debulk large carcinomas before surgical excision. Orbital invasion may be observed despite topical therapy, however, and careful monitoring of patients on these agents is warranted.[69, 70]
Despite its significant potential for deleterious effects on limbal stem cells, mitomycin C 0.04% is effective as a neoadjuvant or postoperative agent in the treatment of conjunctival intraepithelial neoplasia and primary acquired melanosis. Its utility is less well proven for truly invasive tumors, such as melanoma and carcinoma.
Given the central role that UVR plays in the pathogenesis of cSCC, methods aimed at decreasing UVR exposure form the cornerstone of cSCC prevention. The evidence behind other measures to prevent cSCC is lacking; eg, large, well-controlled studies have failed to show a beneficial role for dietary supplements, including selenium, beta-carotene, retinol, and isotretinoin, in the prevention of skin cancers.[72, 73, 74, 75]
Reduction of UV exposure
Reduction of UVR exposure can be accomplished as follows:
Avoiding excessive sun exposure
Avoiding artificial sources of UV light (eg, tanning beds)
Wearing protective clothing
Limiting outdoor activities (especially between 10 am and 4 pm) should be recommended to all patients, particularly fair-skinned, elderly patients. Even young patients should be advised to take precautions against excessive sun exposure, to reduce the risk of developing cutaneous malignancies in future.
Patients who are at risk for cSCC but are not able to avoid sun exposure should use sunscreen scrupulously when outdoors. Sunscreen should be reapplied every 30 minutes during acute sun exposure. Several randomized, controlled clinical trials have shown a protective role for the daily application of a broad-spectrum sunscreen in the prevention of new actinic keratoses and new cSCC.[74, 76, 77]
The efficacy of UV protection is measured by its sun protection factor (SPF), which is the ratio of the least amount of UVB radiation that will induce erythema on covered skin to the amount of UVB required to generate the same amount of erythema on uncovered skin. It is often described as the amount of additional time a person can spend in the sun with protection versus without protection. For patients at risk for cSCC, the minimum recommended SPF is 30 or higher.
All patients should be advised to protect their eyelids from sun exposure. Physical sunblocks with the active ingredients of zinc oxide or titanium oxide provide the most complete protection from UVA and UVB rays. Alternatively, a combination chemical sunblock of octocrylene, ecamsule, and avobenzone also provides excellent broad-spectrum UV protection.
Clothing is the simplest method of protection; however, it is often inadequate. For example, a cotton T-shirt has an SPF of less than 10, which decreases sharply when the cloth is wet. Hats with a wide brim or extra-long bill may offer additional protection. Clothing with a high SPF rating is available, but these are often expensive and restrictive.
Skin cancer screening
Current recommendations from the American Cancer Society for skin screening call for a skin examination every 3 years for persons aged 20-39 years and annually after age 40 years. The American Academy of Dermatology recommends annual screening for all patients. However, the US Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to issue a recommendation either for or against skin examination by a primary care clinician or patient skin self-examination, for the early detection of skin cancer in the adult general population.
Treatment of Precancerous Lesions
Several effective treatment modalities exist for precancerous skin lesions, including squamous cell carcinoma in situ (SCCIS) and actinic keratosis. Most of these treatments are easily performed in an outpatient setting.
Topical application of 5-FU or imiquimod is effective in treating precancerous skin lesions. Similarly, liquid nitrogen cryotherapy or electrocautery and curettage may be used, with cure rates reported at greater than 95%. The risks associated with cryotherapy include transient pain, edema, and blistering. Hypopigmentation and alopecia are also common and may be permanent, so treatment of hair-bearing areas and in darkly pigmented individuals is generally not recommended.
Many patients with light skin and a history of extensive sun exposure develop epidermal atypia in the form of actinic keratosis and SCCIS over large areas of their skin. Most of these patients also develop multiple invasive cSCCs. The management of such patients is highly labor intensive and involves the following steps:
Surgically remove all tumors that clinically appear to have to have an invasive (dermal) component and confirm clearance of histologic margins
Evaluate for underlying immunosuppression, such as from chronic lymphocytic leukemia or from overimpairment of the immune system by immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy; if this last is suspected, discuss with the patient’s other doctors whether the immunosuppression can be safely remedied or lessened
Perform field treatment of the areas of epidermal atypia
Follow the patient closely for recurrence of actinic keratosis/SCCIS and for new invasive SCCs; field treatment may need to be repeated every 6-12 months to keep precursor actinic keratosis and SCCIS lesions to a minimum
Options for field treatment include topical chemotherapy with 5-FU or photodynamic therapy. Imiquimod has limited utility in diffuse disease because adverse effects increase when this agent is applied to large surface areas. If 5-FU therapy is planned, remove any hyperkeratotic lesions with a curette just before beginning therapy, to enhance penetration of the medication to the basal layer.
5-florouracil, capecitabine, and diclofenac sodium
A full course of 5-FU therapy is twice-daily administration for 4 weeks. However, even if the newer, low-concentration 5-FU cream is used (0.5% vs previously available 5% concentration), significant discomfort and irritation are inevitable, and residual erythema at the site of application may persist for months. Patients who cannot tolerate this duration may try shorter courses and then resume treatment after a healing phase. Subsequent treatments become more tolerable as the epidermal damage is corrected.
An oral form of a 5-FU prodrug (capecitabine), which is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for other forms of cancer, may be considered in patients with diffuse SCCIS over large skin areas on which topical 5-FU is difficult to apply. However, studies of efficacy have not yet been performed.
Topical diclofenac sodium gel has been approved for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Twice-daily applications for 60-90 days may similarly clear actinic damage, with the longer course potentially offset by a lesser degree of cutaneous irritation.
Actinic keratosis can also be treated with photodynamic therapy, which uses light, a photosensitizing drug, and oxygen to induce targeted cell death of neoplastic or abnormal tissue. In this treatment, sensitization of the target tissue is selective and occurs through the topically or systemically administered photosensitizing agent. The resulting photochemical reaction causes inflammation and destruction of the targeted lesion(s) via highly reactive oxygen intermediates and free radicals.
Photodynamic therapy is used primarily to treat large numbers of actinic keratoses in a single session. SCCIS is also amenable to photodynamic therapy, although a wide range of recurrence rates (0-52%) have been reported.
The efficacy of topical medications for the treatment of actinic damage is difficult to measure because biopsies are rarely performed before and after treatment (to compare results). Instead, improved skin appearance is used as a gauge for apparent resolution of early SCCIS lesions. For a full discussion of treatment of these lesions, see Actinic Keratosis .
Most cases of cSCC are easily and successfully treated by dermatologists or Mohs surgeons. In certain cases, however, such as the following, a multidisciplinary approach may be needed:
Large or deep tumors in which excision and reconstruction under local anesthesia is not feasible
Surgical margins that are not clear or are in doubt
Nodal or distant metastasis
A multidisciplinary approach using Mohs micrographic surgery performed in conjunction with an otolaryngologist, a plastic surgeon, or both may aid in completely removing deeply invasive SCC, preserving a vital structure (eg, the facial nerve), and facilitating the reconstruction of a large operative defect.
For example, Mohs micrographic surgery may be used in cases of SCC of the scalp that involve bone, to establish peripheral margins to the level of the galea. This would be followed by resection of the deep margin, including bone, with the patient under general anesthesia, performed by a head and neck or plastic surgeon. A surgical focus on the deep margin and reconstruction often spares the patient hours of anesthesia time, lowering surgical morbidity.
Metastatic disease also requires aggressive management by a multidisciplinary team. Surgical treatment of metastatic disorder may require the expertise of an otolaryngologist, a general surgeon, or a surgical oncologist. Adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy may be administered by a radiation oncologist. A medical oncologist should be consulted if systemic chemotherapy is considered for metastatic disease.
With exposure to risk factors, patients require vigilant follow-up care even after successful treatment, because they continue to be at risk for development of additional cutaneous skin malignancies (eg, basal cell carcinoma and SCC of the eyelid). The incidence of multiple primaries is 40% in long-term survivors. Therefore, minimization of modifiable risk factors and early detection of new skin cancers are essential to improve prognosis.
Low-risk tumors are usually cured with appropriate surgical therapy; however, patients who develop 1 SCC have a 40% risk of developing additional SCCs within the next 2 years. This risk likely becomes even greater as more time elapses. Thus, patients with a history of SCC should be evaluated with a complete skin examination every 6-12 months.
Patients with high-risk tumors require skin and lymph node examinations at 3- to 6-month intervals for at least 2 years after diagnosis. In very ̶ high-risk cases, surveillance with CT scanning or MRI may be considered. Recurrent lesions should be treated aggressively. Success in treating recurrences with topical mitomycin C has been reported. In areas of bare sclera, however, pyogenic granulomas occasionally occur soon after tumor excision. These lesions typically respond quickly to topical steroid treatment and must be differentiated from recurrent tumor.
Brash DE. Roles of the transcription factor p53 in keratinocyte carcinomas. Br J Dermatol. 2006 May. 154 Suppl 1:8-10. [Medline].
Hanneman KK, Cooper KD, Baron ED. Ultraviolet immunosuppression: mechanisms and consequences. Dermatol Clin. 2006 Jan. 24(1):19-25. [Medline].
Schwaederle M, Elkin SK, Tomson BN, Carter JL, Kurzrock R. Squamousness: Next-generation sequencing reveals shared molecular features across squamous tumor types. Cell Cycle. 2015 Jun 1. 1-7. [Medline].
Harper JG, Pilcher MF, Szlam S, Lind DS. Squamous cell carcinoma in an African American with discoid lupus erythematosus: a case report and review of the literature. South Med J. 2010 Mar. 103(3):256-9. [Medline].
Mohan SV, Chang J, Li S, Henry AS, Wood DJ, Chang AL. Increased Risk of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Vismodegib Therapy for Basal Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2016 May 1. 152 (5):527-32. [Medline].
Gilberg SM, Tse DT. Malignant eyelid tumors. Ophthalmol Clin. 5:261-85.
de Gruijl FR, Rebel H. Early events in UV carcinogenesis--DNA damage, target cells and mutant p53 foci. Photochem Photobiol. 2008 Mar-Apr. 84(2):382-7. [Medline].
Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffell DJ, Simon JA, Sharma HW, Kimmelman J, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature. 1994 Dec 22-29. 372(6508):773-6. [Medline].
Perry PK, Silverberg NB. Cutaneous malignancy in albinism. Cutis. 2001 May. 67(5):427-30. [Medline].
Zghal M, El-Fekih N, Fazaa B, et al. [Xeroderma pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular, and neurologic abnormalities in 49 Tunisian cases]. Tunis Med. 2005 Dec. 83(12):760-3. [Medline].
Black AP, Bailey A, Jones L, Turner RJ, Hollowood K, Ogg GS. p53-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in individuals with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Nov. 153(5):987-91. [Medline].
Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Claudy A. Skin cancers after organ transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 24. 348(17):1681-91. [Medline].
Jensen P, Hansen S, Moller B, et al. Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Feb. 40(2 Pt 1):177-86. [Medline].
Euvrard S, Kanitakis J, Decullier E, et al. Subsequent skin cancers in kidney and heart transplant recipients after the first squamous cell carcinoma. Transplantation. 2006 Apr 27. 81(8):1093-100. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Quinn DI, Ong CS, et al. Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience. Cancer. 1999 Apr 15. 85(8):1758-64. [Medline].
Wilkins K, Turner R, Dolev JC, LeBoit PE, Berger TG, Maurer TA. Cutaneous malignancy and human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Feb. 54(2):189-206; quiz 207-10. [Medline].
Mallipeddi R. Epidermolysis bullosa and cancer. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002 Nov. 27(8):616-23. [Medline].
Fine JD, Johnson LB, Weiner M, Li KP, Suchindran C. Epidermolysis bullosa and the risk of life-threatening cancers: the National EB Registry experience, 1986-2006. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Feb. 60(2):203-11. [Medline].
Reed WB, College J Jr, Francis MJ, et al. Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica with epidermal neoplasms. Arch Dermatol. 1974 Dec. 110(6):894-902. [Medline].
Kowal-Vern A, Criswell BK. Burn scar neoplasms: a literature review and statistical analysis. Burns. 2005 Jun. 31(4):403-13. [Medline].
Mallipeddi R, Keane FM, McGrath JA, Mayou BJ, Eady RA. Increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004 Sep. 18(5):521-6. [Medline].
Arbiser JL, Fan CY, Su X, et al. Involvement of p53 and p16 tumor suppressor genes in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa-associated squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Oct. 123(4):788-90. [Medline].
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures: 2013. [Full Text].
Reifler DM, Hornblass A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986 May-Jun. 30(6):349-65. [Medline].
Gray DT, Suman VJ, Su WP, Clay RP, Harmsen WS, Roenigk RK. Trends in the population-based incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin first diagnosed between 1984 and 1992. Arch Dermatol. 1997 Jun. 133(6):735-40. [Medline].
Hampton T. Skin cancer's ranks rise: immunosuppression to blame. JAMA. 2005 Sep 28. 294(12):1476-80. [Medline].
Staples MP, Elwood M, Burton RC, Williams JL, Marks R, Giles GG. Non-melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. Med J Aust. 2006 Jan 2. 184(1):6-10. [Medline].
Buettner PG, Raasch BA. Incidence rates of skin cancer in Townsville, Australia. Int J Cancer. 1998 Nov 23. 78(5):587-93. [Medline].
McCall CO, Chen SC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the legs in African Americans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Oct. 47(4):524-9. [Medline].
Christenson LJ, Borrowman TA, Vachon CM, et al. Incidence of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas in a population younger than 40 years. JAMA. 2005 Aug 10. 294(6):681-90. [Medline].
Housman TS, Feldman SR, Williford PM, et al. Skin cancer is among the most costly of all cancers to treat for the Medicare population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Mar. 48(3):425-9. [Medline].
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, eds. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and other cutaneous carcinomas. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. 301-9.
Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Hess SD, Katz KA, Berg D, Schmults CD. Uncertainty in the perioperative management of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma among Mohs surgeons. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Nov. 146(11):1225-31. [Medline].
Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al. Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 1. 23(4):759-65. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope. 2005 May. 115(5):870-5. [Medline].
Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Jun. 26(6):976-90. [Medline].
Ross AS, Schmults CD. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the English literature. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Nov. 32(11):1309-21. [Medline].
Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Epidemiologic characteristics and clinical course of patients with malignant eyelid tumors in an incidence cohort in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr. 106(4):746-50. [Medline].
Dailey JR, Kennedy RH, Flaharty PM, Eagle RC Jr, Flanagan JC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Sep. 10(3):153-9. [Medline].
Thosani MK, Schneck G, Jones EC. Periocular squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg. 2008 May. 34(5):585-99. [Medline].
Bowyer JD, Sullivan TJ, Whitehead KJ, Kelly LE, Allison RW. The management of perineural spread of squamous cell carcinoma to the ocular adnexae. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jul. 19(4):275-81. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Palme CE, Morgan GJ. High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from 266 treated patients with metastatic lymph node disease. Cancer. 2006 Jun 1. 106(11):2389-96. [Medline].
Fleming MD, Hunt JL, Purdue GF, Sandstad J. Marjolin's ulcer: a review and reevaluation of a difficult problem. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990 Sep-Oct. 11(5):460-9. [Medline].
Novick M, Gard DA, Hardy SB, Spira M. Burn scar carcinoma: a review and analysis of 46 cases. J Trauma. 1977 Oct. 17(10):809-17. [Medline].
Brantsch KD, Meisner C, Schonfisch B, et al. Analysis of risk factors determining prognosis of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug. 9(8):713-20. [Medline].
Ross AS, Whalen FM, Elenitsas R, Xu X, Troxel AB, Schmults CD. Diameter of involved nerves predicts outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with perineural invasion: an investigator-blinded retrospective cohort study. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Dec. 35(12):1859-66. [Medline].
Manyam BV, Gastman B, Zhang AY, et al. Inferior outcomes in immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and radiation therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 May 29. [Medline].
Mehrany K, Weenig RH, Pittelkow MR, Roenigk RK, Otley CC. High recurrence rates of squamous cell carcinoma after Mohs' surgery in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Dermatol Surg. 2005 Jan. 31(1):38-42; discussion 42. [Medline].
Frierson HF Jr, Deutsch BD, Levine PA. Clinicopathologic features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Hum Pathol. 1988 Dec. 19(12):1397-402. [Medline].
Straif K, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Baan R, et al. A review of human carcinogens--part C: metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. Lancet Oncol. 2009 May. 10(5):453-4. [Medline].
Salasche SJ. Epidemiology of actinic keratoses and squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Jan. 42(1 Pt 2):4-7. [Medline].
Goepfert H, Dichtel WJ, Medina JE, Lindberg RD, Luna MD. Perineural invasion in squamous cell skin carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1984 Oct. 148(4):542-7. [Medline].
Hong TS, Kriesel KJ, Hartig GK, Harari PM. Parotid area lymph node metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: implications for diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Head Neck. 2005 Oct. 27(10):851-6. [Medline].
Barros JN, Lowen MS, Ballalai PL, Mascaro VL, Gomes JA, Martins MC. Predictive index to differentiate invasive squamous cell carcinoma from preinvasive ocular surface lesions by impression cytology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb. 93(2):209-14. [Medline].
Pe'er J. Ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar. 18(1):1-13, vii. [Medline].
Papaioannou IT, Melachrinou MP, Drimtzias EG, Gartaganis SP. Corneal-conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma. Cornea. 2008 Sep. 27(8):957-8. [Medline].
Gokmen Soysal H, Ardic F. Malignant conjunctival tumors invading the orbit. Ophthalmologica. 2008. 222(5):338-43. [Medline].
Hirst LW, Axelsen RA, Schwab I. Pterygium and associated ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan. 127(1):31-2. [Medline].
Forest VI, Clark JJ, Veness MJ, Milross C. N1S3: a revised staging system for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases: results of 2 Australian Cancer Centers. Cancer. 2010 Mar 1. 116(5):1298-304. [Medline].
Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Aug. 27(2 Pt 1):241-8. [Medline].
Nelson BR, Railan D, Cohen S. Mohs' micrographic surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Clin Plast Surg. 1997 Oct. 24(4):705-18. [Medline].
Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope. 2005 May. 115(5):870-5. [Medline].
Rudkin AK, Muecke JS. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of localised ocular surface squamous neoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul. 95(7):947-50. [Medline].
Bauman JE, Eaton KD, Martins RG. Treatment of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with cetuximab. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Jul. 143(7):889-92. [Medline].
Suen JK, Bressler L, Shord SS, Warso M, Villano JL. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma responding serially to single-agent cetuximab. Anticancer Drugs. 2007 Aug. 18(7):827-9. [Medline].
Arnold AW, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Zuger C, Itin PH. Cetuximab therapy of metastasizing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with severe recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Dermatology. 2009. 219(1):80-3. [Medline].
Reeves TD, Hill EG, Armeson KE, Gillespie MB. Cetuximab therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the data. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 May. 144(5):676-84. [Medline].
Char DH, Crawford JB. Orbital invasion despite topical anti-metabolite therapy for conjunctival carcinoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar. 246(3):459-61. [Medline].
Shields CL, Demirci H, Marr BP, Masheyekhi A, Materin M, Shields JA. Chemoreduction with topical mitomycin C prior to resection of extensive squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan. 123(1):109-13. [Medline].
Russell HC, Chadha V, Lockington D, Kemp EG. Topical mitomycin C chemotherapy in the management of ocular surface neoplasia: a 10-year review of treatment outcomes and complications. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct. 94(10):1316-21. [Medline].
Duffield-Lillico AJ, Slate EH, Reid ME, et al. Selenium supplementation and secondary prevention of nonmelanoma skin cancer in a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Oct 1. 95(19):1477-81. [Medline].
Frieling UM, Schaumberg DA, Kupper TS, Muntwyler J, Hennekens CH. A randomized, 12-year primary-prevention trial of beta carotene supplementation for nonmelanoma skin cancer in the physician's health study. Arch Dermatol. 2000 Feb. 136(2):179-84. [Medline].
Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999 Aug 28. 354(9180):723-9. [Medline].
Levine N, Moon TE, Cartmel B, et al. Trial of retinol and isotretinoin in skin cancer prevention: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Southwest Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 Nov. 6(11):957-61. [Medline].
Naylor MF, Boyd A, Smith DW, Cameron GS, Hubbard D, Neldner KH. High sun protection factor sunscreens in the suppression of actinic neoplasia. Arch Dermatol. 1995 Feb. 131(2):170-5. [Medline].
Thompson SC, Jolley D, Marks R. Reduction of solar keratoses by regular sunscreen use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Oct 14. 329(16):1147-51. [Medline].
Seite S, Colige A, Piquemal-Vivenot P, et al. A full-UV spectrum absorbing daily use cream protects human skin against biological changes occurring in photoaging. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2000 Aug. 16(4):147-55. [Medline].
Seite S, Moyal D, Richard S, et al. Mexoryl SX: a broad absorption UVA filter protects human skin from the effects of repeated suberythemal doses of UVA. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1998 Jun 15. 44(1):69-76. [Medline].
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Skin Cancer: Recommendation Statement. AHRQ Publication No. 09-05128-EF-2, Feb 2009. Available at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf09/skincancer/skincanrs.htm. Accessed: Nov 7, 2013.
Kuflik EG, Gage AA. The five-year cure rate achieved by cryosurgery for skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Jun. 24(6 Pt 1):1002-4. [Medline].
Lewis R. NSAIDs May Protect Against Common Skin Cancer. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/836938. Accessed: December 20, 2014.
Muranushi C, Olsen CM, Pandeya N, Green AC. Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can prevent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Apr. 135(4):975-83. [Medline].
Gloster HM Jr, Brodland DG. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 1996 Mar. 22(3):217-26. [Medline].
Beadle BM, Liao KP, Elting LS, et al. Improved survival using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: a SEER-Medicare analysis. Cancer. 2014 Mar 1. 120(5):702-10. [Medline].
Boggs W. Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Improves Head and Neck Cancer Survival. Medscape [serial online]. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/819080. Accessed: Jan 28 2014.