Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Radiation Enteritis and Proctitis Treatment & Management

  • Author: Neelu Pal, MD; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA  more...
 
Updated: Dec 14, 2015
 

Approach Considerations

Most patients initially respond well to conservative therapy; however, recurring symptoms and signs often eventually necessitate surgical intervention. Indications for surgical intervention include the following:

  • To prevent radiation-induced injury to the small bowel
  • To treat complications of radiation-induced injury to the small and large bowel, including perforation, obstruction (the most common presentation of chronic radiation enteritis), fistula, and bleeding (the most common presentation of chronic radiation proctitis)

Debate continues over the timing and extent of surgery for the complications of radiation-induced intestinal injury. Advocates of limited surgical procedures (including bypass procedures and diverting ostomy) suggest that these are safer, with a mortality of 2-10% and a morbidity of 20-30%. Other authors advocate wide resection of affected intestinal segments with anastomosis to the transverse colon. These authors report mortality and morbidity figures similar to those reported for bypass procedures.

Next

Medical Therapy

Preventive measures

Measures designed to decrease or prevent the occurrence of radiation-induced enteropathy are an integral part of radiation therapy administration. Preventive measures include medical therapies to decrease the effects of radiation on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The commonly used methods of prevention include the following:

  • Basic bowel care (including maintenance of adequate hydration) and dietary modifications - Many patients develop transient lactose intolerance
  • Sulfasalazine, 500 mg orally twice daily - This has been shown to help reduce the incidence and severity of radiation-induced enteropathy in patients receiving external beam radiotherapy to the pelvis
  • Amifostine (WR-2721) - This is a prodrug that is converted to its intracellular metabolite, WR-1065, which acts as a radioprotectant; intracellular oxidation of WR-1065 yields active metabolites that protect the cell by scavenging free radicals and stabilizing the DNA; WR-2721 administered intravenously (IV) in a dose of 340 mg/m 2 is proven to decrease the incidence of radiation proctitis in patients who are receiving standard-dose radiotherapy for rectal cancer; WR-2721 has also been used as an intrarectal foam enema (ProctoFoam) with variable results
  • Sucralfate, orally and as enemas - This has been proposed as a mucosal protective agent for prevention of radiation-induced enteropathy, with variable results
  • Glutamine - This is the preferred metabolic fuel for enterocytes; it may be an effective radioprotectant [18]

Prebiotics (eg, inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide) have been suggested as a possible means of helping to prevent acute radiation enteritis in patients with gynecologic cancer.[19]  Scartoni et al found that a zinc-based nutritional supplement to which prebiotics, tyndalized probiotics, and vitamins had been added was a safe and feasible means of protecting against radiation-induced diarrhea in patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy.[20]

Medical control of symptoms

The following medical treatments aim to control the symptoms of radiation-induced enteritis and proctitis:

  • Adequate hydration
  • Antidiarrheals – Loperamide is a commonly used first agent; if diarrhea is not adequately controlled with the use of loperamide, octreotide at a dosage of 100 μg subcutaneously (SC) twice daily has been shown to be effective; cholestyramine also decreases the frequency of diarrhea
  • Antiemetic medication
  • Sucralfate enemas (used to decrease the bleeding associated with chronic radiation-induced proctitis)
  • Sulfasalazine, orally and as enemas (decreases the symptoms of tenesmus, abdominal cramping, and diarrhea associated with radiation enteritis and proctitis)
  • Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (consider in the treatment of intractable radiation proctitis, prior to surgical intervention)

Modification of radiotherapy

Modification in the delivery of radiotherapy may decrease radiation-induced bowel injury. Some of these techniques currently practiced include the following:

  • Multiple-field conformal therapy with prior three-dimensional (3D) planning
  • Pretreatment small-bowel contrast studies (to evaluate the position of the small bowel within the abdominopelvic cavity)
  • Methods to relocate the small bowel from the pelvic cavity into the abdominal cavity - Prone or Trendelenburg positioning; bladder distention; abdominal wall compression; open table-top device (belly board); temporary pneumoperitoneum

Nonsurgical bleeding control

Nonsurgical endoscopic interventions are commonly used to treat recurrent bleeding associated with chronic radiation proctitis.

Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the endoscopic technique of choice to control mucosal bleeding due to chronic radiation proctitis. Compared with laser or heater probe therapy, APC has a limited depth of penetration, resulting in a lower risk of perforation. Multiple treatments are usually required, but bleeding is successfully controlled in 85-90% of patients. The neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser has been used to achieve hemostasis, but less successfully than APC.

Topical formalin therapy controls bleeding inexpensively and effectively. Two main techniques are used to apply formalin to the bleeding mucosa. In the first, formalin (50-mL aliquots of 4% solution for a total volume of 400 mL) may be instilled in the rectum via a proctoscope. The formalin remains in contact with the rectal mucosa for 30 seconds, followed with copious saline irrigation between applications. After each treatment and lavage, the rectal mucosa is examined for cessation of bleeding. This technique is used for diffuse bleeding from the mucosal surface.

In the alternative technique, formalin-soaked gauze is directly applied to an area of localized bleeding. Blind instillation of formalin via a rectal tube is not advised because of the risk of perforation. Anal-fissure formation is a common complication after formalin therapy. Hence, care must be taken with both techniques to protect the perianal skin.

Previous
Next

General Principles of Surgical Management

Choice of procedure

Surgical intervention may prevent or treat the complications of enteritis or proctitis. Preventive surgical procedures are performed in conjunction with the primary surgical procedure for cancer resection. Patients are candidates for a primary surgical preventive procedure if they do not require abdominal or pelvic surgery for treatment of malignancy yet are at high risk to develop radiation-induced injury.

Surgical intervention is reserved for the most refractory cases and for complications such as obstruction, perforation, fistula, or hemorrhage. Operative treatment is individualized on the basis of the following:

  • Patient’s overall condition
  • Preoperative assessment of the lesion
  • Technical feasibility of performing the optimal surgical procedure
  • Intraoperative findings

Typically, patients with complicated small-bowel radiation injuries are best treated with resection if feasible, bypass if necessary, and diversion or exclusion of the affected segment as a last resort. Patients with complicated colorectal radiation injuries are best treated with resection and primary anastomosis, if possible. Proximal diversion should be performed if impaired healing of the anastomosis is a concern. Repair of fistulas may be performed via a transabdominal or perineal approach.

Preoperative evaluation and treatment

The preoperative evaluation for treatment of complications of radiation-induced intestinal injury reveals patients who are surgical candidates. Their overall condition is optimized prior to surgery, and surgical treatment is appropriately individualized in accordance with the severity and extent of the injury.

Radiation enteritis complications

Decompression of small bowel obstruction with placement of a nasogastric tube may be performed.

IV hydration and correction of electrolyte imbalance may be provided. Patients with small-bowel obstruction may be significantly dehydrated and have severe electrolyte abnormalities.

Unless an operation is emergent, preoperative radiologic evaluation with small-bowel follow-through and barium enema should be performed. These studies may reveal synchronous lesions that are common in radiation enteritis and may influence the planned operative procedure.

Radiologic and endoscopic evaluation may exclude recurrent or primary malignancy. Radiation-induced strictures are longer, with gradual tapering to the point of stenosis with edematous, speckled-appearing mucosa. In contrast, malignant strictures have distinct separation from healthy intestine, and the mucosa and bowel wall have a heterogeneous appearance. These radiologic findings are not pathognomonic, and the tissue may have to be obtained endoscopically to differentiate malignant from radiation-induced strictures. Fistulas may also represent areas of recurrent or de-novo malignancy that must be differentiated from radiation-induced injury.

Comorbid conditions should be corrected or treated. Perioperative risks may be reduced through correction of severe anemia and optimization of nutritional status.

Radiation proctitis complications

Exclude recurrent local or disseminated cancer through endoscopic evaluation of tissue biopsy samples from the area of the fistula or stricture.

Evaluate the patient for suitability for major pelvic surgery. Patients who are debilitated may not be candidates for resectional procedures, which may lead to significant blood loss and the risk of anastomotic leak. These patients may be better served by a proximal diverting colostomy or a local fistula repair procedure.

Perform anal manometry to evaluate rectal compliance, anal function, and continence. The presence of a noncompliant rectum is an indication for a resectional procedure rather than a local fistula repair. Incontinence is an indication for a proximal colostomy rather than resection or repair.

Determine the surgical approach (dictated by the location of the fistula or stricture with respect to the levator ani muscle). High lesions are approached transabdominally, while low fistulas may be repaired via a perineal approach. Low-lying strictures may be addressed similarly with repeat anal dilations or transanal strictureplasty. Larger fistulas or those associated with strictures or significant proctitis require a transabdominal approach with resection.

Previous
Next

Surgery for Radiation Enteritis

Prevention

Surgical procedures for prevention of radiation enteritis (see Table 2 below) are based on the principles of reperitonealization and abdominopelvic partitioning.

Table 2. Surgical Procedures to Prevent Radiation Enteritis (Open Table in a new window)

Native tissue Prosthetic materials
Reperitonealization procedures Omentum-based procedures
Peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath Omental transposition flap Synthetic pelvic mold (spacer)
Uterine broad ligaments Omentopexy - Omental apron or envelope Saline-filled tissue expanders
Bladder Omental hammock or sling Absorbable mesh sling

With respect to abdominopelvic partitioning, surgical preventive procedures are used to exclude the mobile small bowel from the pelvic cavity, keeping it away from the area of maximal irradiation. Native tissue or prosthetic material may be used to create a partition between the abdominal and pelvic cavities or to enclose and contain the small bowel within the abdomen.

In reperitonealization procedures, native tissue (eg, peritoneum, bladder, uterine broad ligaments) may be used to create a separation between the abdominal and pelvic cavities. In omental-based procedures, an omental flap based on the left gastroepiploic pedicle is used to create the partition and to contain the small bowel within the abdominal cavity.

The absorbable mesh sling procedure is performed most often (of the operations that use prosthetic materials to exclude the small bowel from the pelvic cavity). Procedures performed less often use pelvic space–occupying devices to displace the small-bowel loops.

Technical considerations

Postoperative adhesions result in fixation of the small bowel, especially within the postoperative pelvis. The limited mobility of this bowel makes it more susceptible to radiation injury. Multiple surgical techniques to exclude the small bowel from the pelvis have been described in the literature. Typically, these procedures are performed with the primary surgical procedure for the malignancy. Occasionally, patients who do not require surgery to treat the primary malignancy still require a small bowel exclusion procedure, because they are at high risk of developing radiation-induced intestinal injury.

Small-bowel exclusion from the pelvis is best achieved using the omentum. Various techniques have been reported in the literature, three of which are commonly performed (see below).

In 1984, Russ et al described the omental transposition flap procedure. An omental pedicle flap based on the left gastroepiploic vessels is placed along the left paracolic gutter and sutured into place. The remainder of the omental bulk is packed into the pelvic cavity, effectively excluding the small bowel from occupying this space and providing protection from radiation injury (see the image below).

Omental transposition flap based on left gastroepi Omental transposition flap based on left gastroepiploic vascular bundle is sutured in place along the left paracolic gutter, and the omental bulk is packed into the pelvic cavity.

In 1985, DeLuca and Ragins described the omental envelope technique.[7] The omentum is draped over the small bowel as an apron. The lower edge of the omentum is sutured to the posterior abdominal wall at the level of the sacral promontory. The lateral borders are sutured to the ascending and descending colon (see the image below). This procedure is also known as abdominopelvic omentopexy .

Omental envelope is created by draping the omentum Omental envelope is created by draping the omentum over the small bowel and suturing the lateral edges to the peritoneum in the paracolic gutters. The lower edge is sutured to the posterior abdominal wall at the level of the sacral promontory.

In 1995, Choi and Lee described the omental pedicle hammock technique.[9] An omental pedicle based on the left gastroepiploic vessels is created and sutured circumferentially to the parietal peritoneum at the level of the sacral promontory and umbilicus. This creates a sling, or hammock, which contains the bowel and prevents it from entering the pelvis (see the image below).

An omental pedicle based on the left gastroepiploi An omental pedicle based on the left gastroepiploic vessels is sutured circumferentially to the parietal peritoneum at the level of the sacral promontory and umbilicus. This creates a sling, or hammock, which contains the bowel and prevents it from entering the pelvis.

Reperitonealization procedures use native tissue to isolate the pelvis from the abdominal cavity. The tissue is seldom adequate or strong enough to achieve adequate exclusion; thus, these are not commonly performed procedures.

In 1979, Freund et al described a technique of suturing the anterolateral peritoneum to the bladder to the posterior retroperitoneal tissues.[6] In women, the uterus and broad ligaments may be used in addition to the posterior tissue. Chen et al described the approximation of the peritoneum and the posterior rectus sheath to create a peritoneal reconstruction after resection of rectal cancer.

Many patients lack adequate peritoneum and omentum, often because of previous surgical procedures or the presence of extensive omental adhesions that make the tissue impossible to use. Alternative abdominopelvic partitioning procedures using prosthetic materials have been described. Currently, the prosthetic mesh sling procedure is performed most often.

In 1984, Devereux et al first described the absorbable mesh sling technique.[12] A polyglycolic acid or polyglactin mesh sling is sutured in place at the level of the sacral promontory and circumferentially attached to the retroperitoneum and lateral abdominal wall. Anteriorly, the mesh is attached at the level of the umbilicus. The small bowel loops are effectively encased within the mesh sling and separated from the pelvic cavity (see the image below). Care is taken to avoid injury to ureters and iliac vessels.

An absorbable mesh sling is created by suturing a An absorbable mesh sling is created by suturing a Vicryl or Dexon mesh to the sacral promontory, lateral abdominal wall, and anterior abdominal wall at the level of the umbilicus. Within this mesh sling, the small bowel loops are contained and held out of the pelvic cavity.

In 1979, Lavery et al reported the use of gauze packs encased in a latex dam to protect the abdominal viscera during high-dose radiotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma of the iliac bone.[10] Placement and removal of the pack required additional surgical procedures.

In 1983, Sugarbaker described the use of a silicone breast implant covered with a mesh baffle to fill the pelvis and to exclude the small bowel.[11] Likewise, Durig et al described the use of a solid synthetic pelvic spacer. More recently, Hoffman et al published their experience using saline-filled tissue expanders to occupy the pelvic cavity (see the image below).

Pelvic-space–occupying device. Pelvic-space–occupying device.

Treatment of complications

Surgical procedures to treat radiation enteritis complications (see Table 3 below) are selected on the basis of the extent of the involved bowel, as well as the technical feasibility of completing the procedure.

Table 3. Surgical Procedures to Treat Complications of Radiation Enteritis (Open Table in a new window)

Obstruction Fistula Perforation Hemorrhage
Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis
Bypass of multiple/long strictures Bypass of fistula area    
Strictureplasty Diversion with proximal ostomy    
Diversion with proximal ostomy  

Obstruction is the most common chronic complication affecting the irradiated small bowel. In patients with chronic radiation enteritis who require surgical intervention, 75-80% require treatment of an obstruction. Long or multiple stricture segments may be more appropriately treated with bypass.

Strictureplasty has been reported to successfully treat the obstruction. Strictureplasty involves performing a repair of enterotomies created over irradiated tissue and is associated with a higher risk of leak. Dissecting densely adherent bowel loops free within the pelvis may be impossible without significant risk of creating multiple enterotomies. Bypass of the affected bowel is preferable in these instances as well. Extremely debilitated patients are candidates for a proximal decompressing ostomy.

Fistulas account for 5-10% of irradiated bowel complications that necessitate surgery. Adjacent pelvic structures (ie, bladder, rectum, vagina) are areas in which fistulas often form with small bowel. Surgery entails resection of the involved small bowel up to healthy margins. Primary anastomosis of the divided ends of bowel is performed. The defect in the involved bladder, vagina, or rectum is closed primarily. Diversion of the enteric contents via a proximal ostomy is an option in the presence of a hostile abdomen or in patients who are severely debilitated.

Perforation is a rare complication of delayed effects of radiation and is often associated with obstruction. The treatment of perforation involves resection of the area of perforation with exteriorization of the divided ends of the bowel (if intraperitoneal contamination is extensive). Performing a primary anastomosis may be possible if the area of contamination is localized.

Hemorrhage rarely requires surgical intervention. An area of uncontrolled bleeding that can be localized within the small bowel but cannot be treated conservatively may require surgical resection of the involved bowel segment.

Technical considerations

Certain technical principles are crucial to the success of procedures performed to treat the complications of radiation-induced intestinal injury.

Lysis of adhesions should be limited because of the risk of inadvertent enterotomies and denudation of intestinal serosa. This increases the risk of peritonitis, sepsis, and fistula formation. Intestinal fistulas often form in patients who have undergone laparotomy to treat intestinal obstruction, which developed as a consequence of radiation injury. Enterotomies, serosal injuries, and nonhealing anastomoses in irradiated tissue results in the formation of fistulas.

Intestinal obstruction from dense adhesions of fixed bowel loops within the pelvis is best treated with bypass of the adherent strictured segments. In these patients, excessive attempts to lyse adhesions leads to a high complication rate, including short-bowel syndrome.

Perforation should be treated with resection of the involved segment, because bypass inevitably leads to the complications of fistula, peritonitis, or sepsis.

If resection is performed, at least one end of the anastomosis should include intestine that is located outside the irradiated field. Most often, this is the transverse colon or splenic flexure. Almost 50% of anastomoses that are performed in diseased bowel result in a breakdown because of the poor healing of irradiated tissue.

If the viability of an anastomosis is questionable, preferably, a stoma should be constructed.

Previous
Next

Surgery for Radiation Proctitis

Treatment of complications

The rectum, with its fixed position and proximity to the area undergoing treatment, is the most common site of injury following radiation to the pelvis. As such, long-term complications include hemorrhagic proctitis, rectovaginal fistulas, and rectal strictures (see Table 4 below).

Table 4. Surgical Treatment of Radiation Proctitis Complications (Open Table in a new window)

Hemorrhagic proctitis Rectovaginal fistulas and strictures
Transabdominal procedures Perineal procedures
Proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis Proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis Transanal flap
Proctectomy with end colostomy Proctectomy with end colostomy Transvaginal flap
  Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis  
  Ileocecal reservoir  
  Sigmoid colon onlay patch (Bricker-Johnston)  

Most often, hemorrhagic proctitis is adequately treated with endoscopic APC or Nd:YAG laser treatment, heater probe coagulation, or application of formalin. Patients with recalcitrant bleeding from the rectal mucosa may undergo proctectomy. This is a morbid procedure in the irradiated pelvis and is associated with significant blood loss. Primary anastomosis should be performed, if possible. If technically difficult, an end colostomy may have to be created. Creation of a proximal ostomy without resection has been reported in the literature; however, this procedure rarely controls the bleeding, since the diseased rectum remains in place.

Rectovaginal fistulas and rectal strictures are a common problem with irradiation. The treatment approach is transabdominal for high fistulas and perineal for low fistulas. The optimal surgical procedure is resection of the fistula and the affected bowel segment, followed with primary colorectal anastomosis. The vaginal defect is repaired or allowed to heal through secondary intention. Patients who are debilitated may benefit from a proximal diverting colostomy. Strictures are treated with resection and primary anastomosis, if possible. Proximal colostomy is an option for severely debilitated patients or in patients who are not good surgical candidates.

Technical considerations

In low-risk patients, rectal strictures and fistulas are best treated with proctectomy with reconstruction. The sigmoid and descending colon is mobilized, the rectum is resected down to the pelvic floor, and dissection within the rectovaginal septum is undertaken to separate the vagina from the rectum. The left colon and splenic flexure are adequately mobilized to obtain sufficient bowel length. The left colic artery and the inferior mesenteric vein at the inferior border of the pancreas are ligated to allow for the mobilization. Preserving the blood supply to the left colon is important. The distal transverse colon should be used as the proximal limb if the blood supply is questionable.

To reconstruct, the descending colon is anastomosed to the rectal remnant just proximal to the dentate line. The anastomosis is performed in an end-to-side manner using a stapling device. A colonic J pouch may be created to allow for improved fecal reservoir capacity. Stapling devices are used to create the colonic reservoir from 5- to 6-cm segments of the colon. The pouch is then either handsewn or stapled to the anus.

If a concomitant high vaginal fistula was resected, the vaginal vault is repaired in layers and omentum is interposed between the areas of resected tissue and anastomosis.

A proximal diverting colostomy may be created if healing of the anastomosis is a concern. The stoma is closed in approximately 3 months, once contrast imaging studies have demonstrated satisfactory healing of the anastomosis or J-pouch reservoir.

Patients who are not candidates for extensive resection procedures benefit from undergoing a proximal diverting colostomy.

Rectovaginal fistulas and strictures located in the distal rectum or anal canal are treated via perineal approaches.

The transanal technique is performed with the patient in jackknife prone position. A trapezoid flap of mucosa, submucosa, and circular muscle is mobilized for several centimeters above the fistula. To ensure adequate blood supply, the width of the base of the flap is twice the width of the apex. The fistula tract is excised and the edges are debrided. The flap is advanced to cover the defect and sutured in place, approximating the muscularis and the mucosa in two layers using long-lasting absorbable suture material. The vaginal side of the fistula is left open to permit drainage.

Transvaginal repair is performed in the dorsal lithotomy position. The vaginal mucosa is incised around the fistula and mobilized circumferentially. The fistula tract is excised and the tissue is debrided. A purse-string suture is placed around the fistula opening to invert the opening toward the rectum, and the vaginal mucosa is closed.

A transperineal approach follows the same principles of excision of the fistula tract, closure of the defect in layers without tension, and possible incorporation of well-vascularized tissue into the repair. A portion of the bulbocavernosus muscle or an island of vulvar skin and adipose tissue (Lehoczky island flap) may be used to close the defect created by the resected area of fistula tract.

The Bricker-Johnston onlay sigmoid patch procedure is rarely used to treat rectovaginal fistula. The fistula tract and surrounding rectal wall is resected. The mobilized sigmoid colon is anastomosed to this area of rectal wall.

Previous
Next

Complications

Factors that contribute to postoperative complications include the following:

  • Poor nutritional status
  • More than one laparotomy prior to radiation
  • Short interval (<12 months) between radiation and surgical intervention

Surgery on irradiated tissue may lead to the following severe complications:

  • Significant blood loss
  • Inadvertent enterotomies
  • Fistula formation
  • Extensive bowel resection resulting in short-bowel syndrome
  • Creation of blind loops because of excessively long bypassed segments
  • Nonhealing of anastomoses performed on irradiated tissue
  • Anastomotic leak with peritonitis and sepsis
Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Neelu Pal, MD General Surgeon

Neelu Pal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Chief Editor

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA Vice Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine, and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director, Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital; American Gastroenterological Association Fellow

John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA is a member of the following medical societies: American Gastroenterological Association, American Physiological Society, American Society of Nephrology, Association for Academic Surgery, International Society of Nephrology, New York Academy of Sciences, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract

Disclosure: Received royalty from AMGEN for consulting; Received ownership interest from Ardelyx for consulting.

Additional Contributors

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS Associate Dean for Medicine, Professor of Surgery and Basic Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences

Marc D Basson, MD, PhD, MBA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Gastroenterological Association, Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Shadad AK, Sullivan FJ, Martin JD, Egan LJ. Gastrointestinal radiation injury: symptoms, risk factors and mechanisms. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14. 19 (2):185-98. [Medline].

  2. Shadad AK, Sullivan FJ, Martin JD, Egan LJ. Gastrointestinal radiation injury: prevention and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 14. 19 (2):199-208. [Medline].

  3. Kalaiselvan R, Theis VS, Dibb M, Teubner A, Anderson ID, Shaffer JL, et al. Radiation enteritis leading to intestinal failure: 1994 patient-years of experience in a national referral centre. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec 11. [Medline].

  4. Walsh D. Deep tissue traumatism from roentgen ray exposure. Br Med J. 1897. 2:272.

  5. Warren S, Friedman NB. Pathology and Pathologic Diagnosis of Radiation Lesions in the Gastro-Intestinal Tract. Am J Pathol. 1942 May. 18 (3):499-513. [Medline].

  6. Freund H, Gunderson L, Krause R, et al. Prevention of radiation enteritis after abdominoperineal resection and radiotherapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Aug. 149(2):206-8. [Medline].

  7. DeLuca FR, Ragins H. Construction of an omental envelope as a method of excluding the small intestine from the field of postoperative irradiation to the pelvis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. Apr/1985. 160(4):365-6. [Medline].

  8. Lechner P, Cesnik H. Abdominopelvic omentopexy: preparatory procedure for radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Dec. 35(12):1157-60. [Medline].

  9. Choi HJ, Lee HS. Effect of omental pedicle hammock in protection against radiation-induced enteropathy in patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Mar. 38(3):276-80. [Medline].

  10. Lavery IC, Harford FJ Jr, Fazio VW. Protection of the intestine during radiation of the pelvic bone. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Jul. 149(1):33-5. [Medline].

  11. Sugarbaker PH. Intrapelvic prosthesis to prevent injury of the small intestine with high dosage pelvic irradiation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Sep. 157(3):269-71. [Medline].

  12. Devereux DF, Kavanah MT, Feldman MI, et al. Small bowel exclusion from the pelvis by a polyglycolic acid mesh sling. J Surg Oncol. 1984 Jun. 26(2):107-12. [Medline].

  13. Deore SM, Shrivastava SK, Supe SJ, et al. Alpha/beta value and importance of dose per fraction for the late rectal and recto-sigmoid complications. Strahlenther Onkol. 1993 Sep. 169(9):521-6. [Medline].

  14. Abayomi J, Kirwan J, Hackett A. The prevalence of chronic radiation enteritis following radiotherapy for cervical or endometrial cancer and its impact on quality of life. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Sep. 13(4):262-7. [Medline].

  15. Sampath S, Schultheiss TE, Hitchcock YJ, Randall RL, Shrieve DC, Wong JY. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma: multi-institutional analysis of 821 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1. 81(2):498-505. [Medline].

  16. Ruiz-Tovar J, Morales V, Hervas A, et al. Late gastrointestinal complications after pelvic radiotherapy: radiation enteritis. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Aug. 11(8):539-43. [Medline].

  17. Webb GJ, Brooke R, De Silva AN. Chronic radiation enteritis and malnutrition. J Dig Dis. 2013 Jul. 14(7):350-7. [Medline].

  18. Vidal-Casariego A, Calleja-Fernández A, de Urbina-González JJ, Cano-Rodríguez I, Cordido F, Ballesteros-Pomar MD. Efficacy of Glutamine in the Prevention of Acute Radiation Enteritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013 Mar 7. [Medline].

  19. Garcia-Peris P, Velasco C, Hernandez M, Lozano MA, Paron L, de la Cuerda C, et al. Effect of inulin and fructo-oligosaccharide on the prevention of acute radiation enteritis in patients with gynecological cancer and impact on quality-of-life: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Nov 25. [Medline].

  20. Scartoni D, Desideri I, Giacomelli I, DI Cataldo V, DI Brina L, Mancuso A, et al. Nutritional Supplement Based on Zinc, Prebiotics, Probiotics and Vitamins to Prevent Radiation-related Gastrointestinal Disorders. Anticancer Res. 2015 Oct. 35 (10):5687-92. [Medline].

  21. Brooks JP, Perry BW. Radiation injury to the small and large bowel. Cameron JL. Current Surgical Therapy. 8. USA: Mosby; 2004. 43.

  22. Buie LA, Malmgren GE. Factitial proctitis. Trans Am Proctol Soc. 1930. 29:80.

  23. Busch DB. Radiation and chemotherapy injury: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. Aug/1993. 15(1):49-89. [Medline].

  24. Cho LC, Antoine JE. Radiation Injury to the Gastrointestinal Tract. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ. Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8. Canada: W.B. Saunders; 2006. 2: 38/813-820.

  25. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30. 31(5):1341-6. [Medline].

  26. Cross MJ, Frazee RC. Surgical treatment of radiation enteritis. Am Surg. Feb/1992. 58(2):132-5. [Medline].

  27. Deveney CW, Lewis FR Jr, Schrock TR. Surgical management of radiation injury of the small and large intestine. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976 Jan-Feb. 19(1):25-9. [Medline].

  28. Draper KR, Sharp KW. Radiation Enteritis. Zuidema GA, Yeo CJ. Zuidema: Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 5. USA: W. B. Saunders; 2002. 2: 31.

  29. Eifel PJ, Levenback C, Wharton JT, et al. Time course and incidence of late complications in patients treated with radiation therapy for FIGO stage IB carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Jul 30. 32(5):1289-300. [Medline].

  30. Fransson P, Widmark A. Late side effects unchanged 4-8 years after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: a comparison with age-matched controls. Cancer. 1999 Feb 1. 85(3):678-88. [Medline].

  31. Franz K, Orth J Falleiner. Roentgen shading. Klin Wochenschr. 1917. 45:662.

  32. Galland RB, Spencer J. Natural history and surgical management of radiation enteritis. Br J Surg. 1987 Aug. 74(8):742-7. [Medline].

  33. Harling H, Balslev I. Long-term prognosis of patients with severe radiation enteritis. Am J Surg. 1988 Mar. 155(3):517-9. [Medline].

  34. Keefe DM, Schubert MM, Elting LS, et al. Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis. Cancer. 2007 Mar 1. 109(5):820-31. [Medline].

  35. Kinsella TJ, Bloomer WD. Tolerance of the intestine to radiation therapy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1980 Aug. 151(2):273-84. [Medline].

  36. Kneebone A, Mameghan H, Bolin T, et al. The effect of oral sucralfate on the acute proctitis associated with prostate radiotherapy: a double-blind, randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Nov 1. 51(3):628-35. [Medline].

  37. Letschert JG, Lebesque JV, Aleman BM, et al. The volume effect in radiation-related late small bowel complications: results of a clinical study of the EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group in patients treated for rectal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 1994 Aug. 32(2):116-23. [Medline].

  38. Letschert JG, Lebesque JV, de Boer RW, et al. Dose-volume correlation in radiation-related late small-bowel complications: a clinical study. Radiother Oncol. 1990 Aug. 18(4):307-20. [Medline].

  39. Lorusso D, Ferrandina G, Greggi S, et al. Phase III multicenter randomized trial of amifostine as cytoprotectant in first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2003 Jul. 14(7):1086-93. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  40. Ludgate SM, Merrick MV. The pathogenesis of post-irradiation chronic diarrhoea: measurement of SeHCAT and B12 absorption for differential diagnosis determines treatment. Clin Radiol. 1985 May. 36(3):275-8. [Medline].

  41. Mak AC, Rich TA, Schultheiss TE, et al. Late complications of postoperative radiation therapy for cancer of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Feb 1. 28(3):597-603. [Medline].

  42. Mameghan H, Fisher R, Mameghan J, et al. Bowel complications after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: the volume effect. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990 Feb. 18(2):315-20. [Medline].

  43. Mendelson RM, Nolan DJ. The radiological features of chronic radiation enteritis. Clin Radiol. 1985 Mar. 36(2):141-8. [Medline].

  44. Morgenstern L, Thompson R, Friedman NB. The modern enigma of radiation enteropathy: sequelae and solutions. Am J Surg. 1977 Jul. 134(1):166-72. [Medline].

  45. Ooi BS, Tjandra JJ, Green MD. Morbidities of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: an overview. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Mar. 42(3):403-18. [Medline].

  46. Perez CA, Lee HK, Georgiou A, et al. Technical factors affecting morbidity in definitive irradiation for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 1. 28(4):811-9. [Medline].

  47. Potish RA, Jones TK Jr, Levitt SH. Factors predisposing to radiation-related small-bowel damage. Radiology. 1979 Aug. 132(2):479-82. [Medline].

  48. Regimbeau JM, Panis Y, Gouzi JL, et al. Operative and long term results after surgery for chronic radiation enteritis. Am J Surg. 2001 Sep. 182(3):237-42. [Medline].

  49. Saclarides T. Radiation injuries of the Rectum. Zuidema GA, Yeo CJ. Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 5. USA: W.B. Saunders; 2002. 2: 34.

  50. Saclarides TJ. Radiation injuries of the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997 Feb. 77(1):261-8. [Medline].

  51. Shiraishi M, Hiroyasu S, Ishimine T, et al. Radiation enterocolitis: overview of the past 15 years. World J Surg. 1998 May. 22(5):491-3. [Medline].

  52. Sigmon WR, Randall ME, Olds WW, et al. Increased chronic bowel complications with split-course pelvic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Jan 15. 28(2):349-53. [Medline].

  53. Waddell BE, Lee RJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, et al. Absorbable mesh sling prevents radiation-induced bowel injury during "sandwich" chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2000 Oct. 135(10):1212-7. [Medline].

  54. Waddell BE, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Lee RJ, et al. Prevention of chronic radiation enteritis. J Am Coll Surg. Dec/1999. 189(6):611-24. [Medline].

  55. Yeoh E, Horowitz M, Russo A, et al. Effect of pelvic irradiation on gastrointestinal function: a prospective longitudinal study. Am J Med. 1993 Oct. 95(4):397-406. [Medline].

  56. Yeoh E, Sun WM, Russo A, Ibanez L, et al. A retrospective study of the effects of pelvic irradiation for gynecological cancer on anorectal function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jul 15. 35(5):1003-10. [Medline].

  57. Zhang H, Williams GM. Capillary and venule proliferation in the healing process of Dacron venous grafts in rats. Surgery. 1992 Apr. 111(4):409-15. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Contrast study of the small bowel revealing areas of extensive strictures with a loop of bowel fixed in the pelvis.
Diffuse inflammation and areas of superficial ulceration observed endoscopically in acute radiation enteritis.
Omental transposition flap based on left gastroepiploic vascular bundle is sutured in place along the left paracolic gutter, and the omental bulk is packed into the pelvic cavity.
Omental envelope is created by draping the omentum over the small bowel and suturing the lateral edges to the peritoneum in the paracolic gutters. The lower edge is sutured to the posterior abdominal wall at the level of the sacral promontory.
An omental pedicle based on the left gastroepiploic vessels is sutured circumferentially to the parietal peritoneum at the level of the sacral promontory and umbilicus. This creates a sling, or hammock, which contains the bowel and prevents it from entering the pelvis.
An absorbable mesh sling is created by suturing a Vicryl or Dexon mesh to the sacral promontory, lateral abdominal wall, and anterior abdominal wall at the level of the umbilicus. Within this mesh sling, the small bowel loops are contained and held out of the pelvic cavity.
Pelvic-space–occupying device.
Table 1. Scoring System for Organ-Specific Radiation-Related Morbidity
  Grade 0 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Signs and symptoms None Mild diarrhea, mild cramping, bowel movements 5 times per day, slight rectal discharge or bleeding Moderate diarrhea and colic, bowel movements >5 times per day, excessive rectal mucus or intermittent bleeding Obstruction or bleeding requiring surgery Necrosis, perforation, fistula Death directly related to late effects of radiation
Table 2. Surgical Procedures to Prevent Radiation Enteritis
Native tissue Prosthetic materials
Reperitonealization procedures Omentum-based procedures
Peritoneum and posterior rectus sheath Omental transposition flap Synthetic pelvic mold (spacer)
Uterine broad ligaments Omentopexy - Omental apron or envelope Saline-filled tissue expanders
Bladder Omental hammock or sling Absorbable mesh sling
Table 3. Surgical Procedures to Treat Complications of Radiation Enteritis
Obstruction Fistula Perforation Hemorrhage
Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis Resection and anastomosis
Bypass of multiple/long strictures Bypass of fistula area    
Strictureplasty Diversion with proximal ostomy    
Diversion with proximal ostomy  
Table 4. Surgical Treatment of Radiation Proctitis Complications
Hemorrhagic proctitis Rectovaginal fistulas and strictures
Transabdominal procedures Perineal procedures
Proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis Proctectomy with coloanal anastomosis Transanal flap
Proctectomy with end colostomy Proctectomy with end colostomy Transvaginal flap
  Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis  
  Ileocecal reservoir  
  Sigmoid colon onlay patch (Bricker-Johnston)  
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.