Blunt Abdominal Trauma
- Author: Eric L Legome, MD; Chief Editor: John Geibel, MD, DSc, MSc, MA more...
Blunt abdominal trauma (see the image below) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. Identification of serious intra-abdominal pathology is often challenging; many injuries may not manifest during the initial assessment and treatment period.
Signs and symptoms
The initial clinical assessment of patients with blunt abdominal trauma is often difficult and notably inaccurate. The most reliable signs and symptoms in alert patients are as follows:
Evidence of peritoneal irritation
However, large amounts of blood can accumulate in the peritoneal and pelvic cavities without any significant or early changes in the physical examination findings. Bradycardia may indicate the presence of free intraperitoneal blood.
On physical examination, the following injury patterns predict the potential for intra-abdominal trauma:
Lap belt marks: Correlate with small intestine rupture
Steering wheel–shaped contusions
Ecchymosis involving the flanks (Grey Turner sign) or the umbilicus (Cullen sign): Indicates retroperitoneal hemorrhage, but is usually delayed for several hours to days
Auscultation of bowel sounds in the thorax: May indicate a diaphragmatic injury
Abdominal bruit: May indicate underlying vascular disease or traumatic arteriovenous fistula
Local or generalized tenderness, guarding, rigidity, or rebound tenderness: Suggests peritoneal injury
Fullness and doughy consistency on palpation: May indicate intra-abdominal hemorrhage
Crepitation or instability of the lower thoracic cage: Indicates the potential for splenic or hepatic injuries
See Clinical Presentation for more detail.
Assessment of hemodynamic stability is the most important initial concern in the evaluation of a patient with blunt abdominal trauma. In the hemodynamically unstable patient, a rapid evaluation for hemoperitoneum can be accomplished by means of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) or the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST). Radiographic studies of the abdomen are indicated in stable patients when the physical examination findings are inconclusive.
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage
DPL is indicated for the following patients in the setting of blunt trauma:
Patients with a spinal cord injury
Those with multiple injuries and unexplained shock
Obtunded patients with a possible abdominal injury
Intoxicated patients in whom abdominal injury is suggested
Patients with potential intra-abdominal injury who will undergo prolonged anesthesia for another procedure
Bedside ultrasonography is a rapid, portable, noninvasive, and accurate examination that can be performed by emergency clinicians and trauma surgeons to detect hemoperitoneum.
The current FAST examination protocol consists of 4 acoustic windows (pericardiac, perihepatic, perisplenic, pelvic) with the patient supine.
An examination is interpreted as positive if free fluid is found in any of the 4 acoustic windows, negative if no fluid is seen, and indeterminate if any of the windows cannot be adequately assessed.
Computed tomography is the standard for detecting solid organ injuries. CT scans provide excellent imaging of the pancreas, duodenum, and genitourinary system.
CT scanning often provides the most detailed images of traumatic pathology and may assist in determination of operative intervention[1, 2, 3, 4] Unlike DPL or FAST, CT can determine the source of hemorrhage.
See Workup for more detail.
Treatment of blunt abdominal trauma begins at the scene of the injury and is continued upon the patient’s arrival at the ED or trauma center. Management may involve nonoperative measures or surgical treatment, as appropriate.
Indications for laparotomy in a patient with blunt abdominal injury include the following:
Signs of peritonitis
Uncontrolled shock or hemorrhage
Clinical deterioration during observation
Hemoperitoneum findings on FAST or DPL
In blunt abdominal trauma, including severe solid organ injuries, selective nonoperative management has become the standard of care. Nonoperative management strategies are based on CT scan diagnosis and the hemodynamic stability of the patient, as follows:
For the most part, pediatric patients can be resuscitated and treated nonoperatively; some pediatric surgeons often transfuse up to 40 mL/kg of blood products in an effort to stabilize a pediatric patient
Hemodynamically stable adults with solid organ injuries, primarily those to the liver and spleen, may be candidates for nonoperative management
Splenic artery embolotherapy, although not standard of care, may be used for adult blunt splenic injury
Nonoperative management involves closely monitoring vital signs and frequently repeating the physical examination
Intra-abdominal injuries secondary to blunt force are attributed to collisions between the injured person and the external environment and to acceleration or deceleration forces acting on the person’s internal organs. Blunt force injuries to the abdomen can generally be explained by 3 mechanisms.
The first mechanism is deceleration. Rapid deceleration causes differential movement among adjacent structures. As a result, shear forces are created and cause hollow, solid, visceral organs and vascular pedicles to tear, especially at relatively fixed points of attachment. For example, the distal aorta is attached to the thoracic spine and decelerates much more quickly than the relatively mobile aortic arch. As a result, shear forces in the aorta may cause it to rupture. Similar situations can occur at the renal pedicles and at the cervicothoracic junction of the spinal cord.
Classic deceleration injuries include hepatic tear along the ligamentum teres and intimal injuries to the renal arteries. As bowel loops travel from their mesenteric attachments, thrombosis and mesenteric tears, with resultant splanchnic vessel injuries, can result.
The second mechanism involves crushing. Intra-abdominal contents are crushed between the anterior abdominal wall and the vertebral column or posterior thoracic cage. This produces a crushing effect, to which solid viscera (eg, spleen, liver, kidneys) are especially vulnerable.
The third mechanism is external compression, whether from direct blows or from external compression against a fixed object (eg, lap belt, spinal column). External compressive forces result in a sudden and dramatic rise in intra-abdominal pressure and culminate in rupture of a hollow viscous organ (ie, in accordance with the principles of Boyle law).
The liver and spleen seem to be the most frequently injured organs, though reports vary. The small and large intestines are the next most frequently injured organs. Recent studies show an increased number of hepatic injuries, perhaps reflecting increased use of CT scanning and concomitant identification of more injuries.
Vehicular trauma is by far the leading cause of blunt abdominal trauma in the civilian population. Auto-to-auto and auto-to-pedestrian collisions have been cited as causes in 50-75% of cases. Other common etiologies include falls and industrial or recreational accidents. Rare causes of blunt abdominal injuries include iatrogenic trauma during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, manual thrusts to clear an airway, and the Heimlich maneuver.
The care of the trauma patient is demanding and requires speed and efficiency. Evaluating patients who have sustained blunt abdominal trauma remains one of the most challenging and resource-intensive aspects of acute trauma care.[5, 6]
Blunt abdominal trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among all age groups. Identification of serious intra-abdominal pathology is often challenging. Many injuries may not manifest during the initial assessment and treatment period. Missed intra-abdominal injuries and concealed hemorrhage are frequent causes of increased morbidity and mortality, especially in patients who survive the initial phase after an injury.
Physical examination findings are notoriously unreliable. One reason is that mechanisms of injury often result in other associated injuries that may divert the physician’s attention from potentially life-threatening intra-abdominal pathology. Other common reasons are an altered mental state and drug and alcohol intoxication.
Coordinating a trauma resuscitation demands a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of trauma and shock, excellent clinical and diagnostic acumen, skill with complex procedures, compassion, and the ability to think rationally in a chaotic milieu.
Blunt abdominal trauma usually results from motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), assaults, recreational accidents, or falls. The most commonly injured organs are the spleen, liver, retroperitoneum, small bowel, kidneys (see the image below), bladder, colorectum, diaphragm, and pancreas. Men tend to be affected slightly more often than women.
For more information, see the following:
The abdomen can be arbitrarily divided into 4 areas. The first is the intrathoracic abdomen, which is the portion of the upper abdomen that lies beneath the rib cage. Its contents include the diaphragm, liver, spleen, and stomach. The rib cage makes this area inaccessible to palpation and complete examination.
The second is the pelvic abdomen, which is defined by the bony pelvis. Its contents include the urinary bladder, urethra, rectum, small intestine, and, in females, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and uterus. Injury to these structures may be extraperitoneal in nature and therefore difficult to diagnose.
The third is the retroperitoneal abdomen, which contains the kidneys, ureters, pancreas, aorta, and vena cava. Injuries to these structures are very difficult to diagnose on the basis of physical examination findings. Evaluation of the structures in this region may require computed tomography (CT) scanning, angiography, and intravenous pyelography (IVP).
The fourth is the true abdomen, which contains the small and large intestines, the uterus (if gravid), and the bladder (when distended). Perforation of these organs is associated with significant physical findings and usually manifests with pain and tenderness from peritonitis. Plain x-ray films are helpful if free air is present. Additionally, diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) is a useful adjunct.
United States statistics
By nearly every measure, injury ranks as one of the most pressing health issues in the United States. More than 150,000 people die each year as a result of injuries, such as motor vehicle crashes, fires, falls, drowning, poisoning, suicide, and homicide. Injuries are the leading cause of death and disability for US children and young adults.
According to the 2000 statistics from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, trauma (unintentional and intentional) was the leading cause of death in persons aged 1-44 years. Further review of the data reveals that in those aged 15-25 years, 14,113 persons died from unintentional injuries, 73% of which were related to vehicular trauma. In individuals aged 25-34 years, 57% of the 11,769 deaths reported were from motor vehicle collisions.
In 2001, approximately 30 million people visited emergency departments (EDs) for the treatment of nonfatal injuries, and more than 72,000 people were disabled by injuries. Injury imposes exceptional costs, both in health care dollars and in human losses, to society.
The true frequency of blunt abdominal trauma, however, is unknown. Data collected from trauma centers reflect patients who are transported to or seek care at these centers; these data may not reflect patients presenting to other facilities. The incidence of out-of-hospital deaths is unknown.
One review from the National Pediatric Trauma Registry by Cooper et al reported that 8% of patients (total=25,301) had abdominal injuries. Eighty-three percent of those injuries were from blunt mechanisms. Automobile-related injuries accounted for 59% of those injuries. Similar reviews from adult trauma databases reflect that blunt trauma is the leading cause of intra-abdominal injury and that MVC is the leading mode of injury. Blunt injuries account for approximately two thirds of all injuries.
Hollow viscus trauma is more frequent in the presence of an associated, severe, solid organ injury, particularly to the pancreas. Approximately two thirds of patients with hollow viscus trauma are injured in MVCs.
In 1990, approximately 5 million people died worldwide as a result of injury. The risk of death from injury varied strongly by region, age, and sex. Approximately 2 male deaths due to violence were reported for every female death. Injuries accounted for approximately 12.5% of all male deaths, compared with 7.4% of female deaths.
Globally, injury accounts for 10% of all deaths; however, injuries in sub-Saharan Africa are far more destructive than in other areas. In sub-Saharan Africa, the risk of death from trauma is highest in those aged 15-60 years, and the proportion of such deaths from trauma is higher than in any other region of the world. South Africa, for instance, has a traffic death rate per unit of distance traveled that is surpassed only by those of Korea, Kenya, and Morocco.
Estimates indicate that by 2020, 8.4 million people will die yearly from injury, and injuries from traffic collisions will be the third most common cause of disability worldwide and the second most common cause in the developing world.
Data from the World Health Organization (WHO) indicate that falls from heights of less than 5 meters are the leading cause of injury, and automobile crashes are the next most frequent cause. These data reflect all injuries, not just blunt injuries to the abdomen.
A review from Singapore described trauma as the leading cause of death in those aged 1-44 years. Traffic accidents, stab wounds, and falls from heights were the leading modes of injury. Blunt abdominal trauma accounted for 79% of cases.
A similar paper from India reported that blunt abdominal trauma is more frequent in males aged 21-30 years; the majority of patients were injured in automobile accidents. A German study indicated that, of patients with vertical deceleration injuries (ie, falls from heights), only 5.9% had blunt abdominal injuries.
Age-related differences in incidence
Most studies indicate that the peak incidence is in persons aged 14-30 years. A review of 19,261 patients with blunt abdominal trauma revealed equal incidence of hollow viscus injuries in both children (ie, ≤14 y) and adults.
Sex-related differences in incidence
According to national and international data, blunt abdominal trauma is more common in men. The male-to-female ratio is 60:40.
Overall prognosis for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma is favorable. Without statistics that indicate the number of out-of-hospital deaths and the total number of patients with blunt trauma to the abdomen, a description of the specific prognosis for patients with intra-abdominal injuries is difficult. Mortality rates for hospitalized patients are approximately 5-10%.
The National Pediatric Trauma Registry reported that 9% of pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma died. Of these, only 22% were reported as having intra-abdominal injuries as the likely cause of death.
A review from Australia of intestinal injuries in blunt trauma reported that 85% of injuries occurred from vehicular accidents. The mortality rate was 6%. In a large review of operating room deaths in which blunt trauma accounted for 61% of all injuries, abdominal trauma was the primary identified cause of death in 53.4% of cases.
Proper adjustment of restraints in motor vehicles is an important aspect of patient education. The following are key recommendations:
Wear lap belts in conjunction with shoulder restraints.
Adjust lap belts so that they fit snugly, and place them across the lower abdomen and below the iliac crests.
Wear restraints even in vehicles equipped with supplemental vehicle restraints (eg, airbags).
Adjust seats and steering wheels so that the distance between the abdominal wall and the steering wheel is as wide as possible while still allowing proper control of the vehicle.
Advise patients to practice defensive driving by observing speed limits and keeping a safe distance between them and other automobiles on the road.
Brasel KJ, Olson CJ, Stafford RE, Johnson TJ. Incidence and significance of free fluid on abdominal computed tomographic scan in blunt trauma. J Trauma. 1998 May. 44(5):889-92. [Medline].
Holmes JF, Offerman SR, Chang CH, Randel BE, Hahn DD, Frankovsky MJ, et al. Performance of helical computed tomography without oral contrast for the detection of gastrointestinal injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2004 Jan. 43(1):120-8. [Medline].
Christiano JG, Tummers M, Kennedy A. Clinical significance of isolated intraperitoneal fluid on computed tomography in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun. 44(6):1242-8. [Medline].
Shanmuganathan K. Multi-detector row CT imaging of blunt abdominal trauma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Apr. 25(2):180-204. [Medline].
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Abdominal Trauma. In: ATLS Student Course Manual. 8th. American College of Surgeons; 2008.
Cooper A, Barlow B, DiScala C, String D. Mortality and truncal injury: the pediatric perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Jan. 29(1):33-8. [Medline].
Ong CL, Png DJ, Chan ST. Abdominal trauma--a review. Singapore Med J. 1994 Jun. 35(3):269-70. [Medline].
Powell DC, Bivins BA, Bell RM. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Aug. 155(2):257-64. [Medline].
Hankin AD, Baren JM. Should the digital rectal examination be a part of the trauma secondary survey?. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb. 53(2):208-12. [Medline].
Enderson BL, Reath DB, Meadors J, Dallas W, DeBoo JM, Maull KI. The tertiary trauma survey: a prospective study of missed injury. J Trauma. 1990 Jun. 30(6):666-9; discussion 669-70. [Medline].
Janjua KJ, Sugrue M, Deane SA. Prospective evaluation of early missed injuries and the role of tertiary trauma survey. J Trauma. 1998 Jun. 44(6):1000-6; discussion 1006-7. [Medline].
Lewis R. Pelvic Radiography Unnecessary in Children if CT Is Planned. Medscape Medical News. Aug 12 2014. [Full Text].
Kwok MY, Yen K, Atabaki S, et al. Sensitivity of Plain Pelvis Radiography in Children With Blunt Torso Trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jul 29. [Medline].
Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Barmparas G, Eberle BM, Lustenberger T, Lam L, et al. Serial white blood cell counts in trauma: do they predict a hollow viscus injury?. J Trauma. 2010 Aug. 69(2):302-7. [Medline].
Ritchie AH, Williscroft DM. Elevated liver enzymes as a predictor of liver injury in stable blunt abdominal trauma patients: case report and systematic review of the literature. Can J Rural Med. 2006 Fall. 11(4):283-7. [Medline].
Akhrass R, Yaffe MB, Brandt CP, Reigle M, Fallon WF Jr, Malangoni MA. Pancreatic trauma: a ten-year multi-institutional experience. Am Surg. 1997 Jul. 63(7):598-604. [Medline].
Knudson MM, McAninch JW, Gomez R, Lee P, Stubbs HA. Hematuria as a predictor of abdominal injury after blunt trauma. Am J Surg. 1992 Nov. 164(5):482-5; discussion 485-6. [Medline].
Tso P, Rodriguez A, Cooper C, Militello P, Mirvis S, Badellino MM, et al. Sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: a preliminary progress report. J Trauma. 1992 Jul. 33(1):39-43; discussion 43-4. [Medline].
Kawaguchi S, Toyonaga J, Ikeda K. Five point method: An ultrasonographic quantification formula of intra-abdominal fluid collection. Jpn J Acute Med. 1987;7:993-7.
Tiling T, Boulion B, Schmid A, et al. Ultrasound in blunt abdominothoracic trauma. In: Border JR, ed. Blunt Multiple Trauma: Comprehensive Pathophysiology and Care. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990:415-33.
Blaivas M, Brannam L, Hawkins M, Lyon M, Sriram K. Bedside emergency ultrasonographic diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture in blunt abdominal trauma. Am J Emerg Med. 2004 Nov. 22(7):601-4. [Medline].
Branney SW, Moore EE, Cantrill SV, Burch JM, Terry SJ. Ultrasound based key clinical pathway reduces the use of hospital resources for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1997 Jun. 42(6):1086-90. [Medline].
Kornezos I, Chatziioannou A, Kokkonouzis I, Nebotakis P, Moschouris H, Yiarmenitis S, et al. Findings and limitations of focused ultrasound as a possible screening test in stable adult patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a Greek study. Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan. 20(1):234-8. [Medline].
Kendall JL, Faragher J, Hewitt GJ, Burcham G, Haukoos JS. Emergency Department Ultrasound Is not a Sensitive Detector of Solid Organ Injury. West J Emerg Med. 2009 Feb. 10(1):1-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Rozycki GS, Ochsner MG, Schmidt JA, Frankel HL, Davis TP, Wang D, et al. A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. J Trauma. 1995 Sep. 39(3):492-8; discussion 498-500. [Medline].
Chiu WC, Cushing BM, Rodriguez A, Ho SM, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, et al. Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). J Trauma. 1997 Apr. 42(4):617-23; discussion 623-5. [Medline].
Matsumoto S, Sekine K, Yamazaki M, Sasao K, Funabiki T, Shimizu M, et al. Predictive value of a flat inferior vena cava on initial computed tomography for hemodynamic deterioration in patients with blunt torso trauma. J Trauma. 2010 Dec. 69(6):1398-402. [Medline].
Holmes JF, Lillis K, Monroe D, Borgialli D, Kerrey BT, Mahajan P, et al. Identifying Children at Very Low Risk of Clinically Important Blunt Abdominal Injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan 29. [Medline].
Mahajan P, Kuppermann N, Tunik M, Yen K, Atabaki SM, Lee LK, et al. Comparison of Clinician Suspicion Versus a Clinical Prediction Rule in Identifying Children at Risk for Intra-abdominal Injuries After Blunt Torso Trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep. 22 (9):1034-41. [Medline].
Benjamin ER, Siboni S, Haltmeier T, Lofthus A, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Negative Finding From Computed Tomography of the Abdomen After Blunt Trauma. JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec 1. 150 (12):1194-5. [Medline].
Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stewart RM, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Kudsk KA. A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma. Ann Surg. 1993 May. 217(5):557-64; discussion 564-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Ivatury RR, Simon RJ, Weksler B, Bayard V, Stahl WM. Laparoscopy in the evaluation of the intrathoracic abdomen after penetrating injury. J Trauma. 1992 Jul. 33(1):101-8; discussion 109. [Medline].
Ortega AE, Tang E, Froes ET, Asensio JA, Katkhouda N, Demetriades D. Laparoscopic evaluation of penetrating thoracoabdominal traumatic injuries. Surg Endosc. 1996 Jan. 10(1):19-22. [Medline].
ROOT HD, HAUSER CW, MCKINLEY CR, LAFAVE JW, MENDIOLA RP Jr. DIAGNOSTIC PERITONEAL LAVAGE. Surgery. 1965 May. 57:633-7. [Medline].
Liu M, Lee CH, P'eng FK. Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1993 Aug. 35(2):267-70. [Medline].
Cryer HG, Larmon B. Patient care phase: prehospital and resuscitation care. In: Greenfield LJ, Mulholland MW, Oldham KT, Zelenock GB, Lillemoe KD, eds. Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;. 1997:280-4.
Pryor JP, Pryor RJ, Stafford PW. Initial phase of trauma management and fluid resuscitation. Trauma Reports. 2002;3(3):1-12.
Nirula R, Maier R, Moore E, Sperry J, Gentilello L. Scoop and run to the trauma center or stay and play at the local hospital: hospital transfer's effect on mortality. J Trauma. 2010 Sep. 69(3):595-9; discussion 599-601. [Medline].
Perel P, Roberts I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17. CD000567. [Medline].
Bunn F, Trivedi D, Ashraf S. Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23. CD001319. [Medline].
Hauser CJ, Boffard K, Dutton R, Bernard GR, Croce MA, Holcomb JB, et al. Results of the CONTROL trial: efficacy and safety of recombinant activated Factor VII in the management of refractory traumatic hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2010 Sep. 69(3):489-500. [Medline].
Requarth JA, D'agostino RB Jr, Miller PR. Nonoperative Management of Adult Blunt Splenic Injury With and Without Splenic Artery Embolotherapy: A Meta-Analysis. J Trauma. 2011 Oct. 71(4):898-903. [Medline].
Mora MC, Wong KE, Friderici J, Bittner K, Moriarty KP, Patterson LA, et al. Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Blunt Pancreatic Trauma: Evaluation of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Dec 18. [Medline].
Crookes BA, Shackford SR, Gratton J, Khaleel M, Ratliff J, Osler T. "Never be wrong": the morbidity of negative and delayed laparotomies after blunt trauma. J Trauma. 2010 Dec. 69(6):1386-91; discussion 1391-2. [Medline].
Mayglothling JA, Haan JM, Scalea TM. Blunt splenic injuries in the adolescent trauma population: the role of angiography and embolization. J Emerg Med. 2011 Jul. 41(1):21-8. [Medline].
Pommerening MJ, DuBose JJ, Zielinski MD, Phelan HA, Scalea TM, Inaba K, et al. Time to first take-back operation predicts successful primary fascial closure in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy. Surgery. 2014 Aug. 156 (2):431-8. [Medline].
Barone JE. Minimize Time Between Damage Control Laparotomy and Take-Back Operation. Reuters Health Information. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/827634. July 02, 2014; Accessed: June 26, 2015.
Boggs W. Routine Urinalysis Not Helpful After Blunt Abdominal Trauma. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/812180. Accessed: October 15, 2013.
Olthof DC, Joosse P, van der Vlies CH, de Reijke TM, Goslings JC. Routine urinalysis in patients with a blunt abdominal trauma mechanism is not valuable to detect urogenital injury. Emerg Med J. 2013 Sep 16. [Medline].