Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment & Management

  • Author: Muhammad A Mir, MD, FACP; Chief Editor: Emmanuel C Besa, MD  more...
 
Updated: May 23, 2016
 

Approach Considerations

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (chronic lymphoid leukemia, CLL) do not need to be treated with chemotherapy until they become symptomatic or display evidence of rapid progression of disease, as characterized by the following:

  • Weight loss of more than 10% over 6 months
  • Extreme fatigue
  • Fever related to leukemia for longer than 2 weeks
  • Night sweats for longer than 1 month
  • Progressive marrow failure (anemia or thrombocytopenia)
  • Autoimmune anemia or thrombocytopenia not responding to glucocorticoids
  • Progressive or symptomatic splenomegaly
  • Massive or symptomatic lymphadenopathy
  • Progressive lymphocytosis, as defined by an increase of > 50% in 2 months or a doubling time of less than 6 months

Patients with low-risk (Binet A) disease whose CLL is stable require only periodic follow-up. In multiple studies and a meta-analysis, early initiation of chemotherapy has failed to show benefit in CLL; indeed, it may increase mortality.[27, 28] As such, early therapy should be considered only in the setting of a clinical trial.

Attempts to consolidate major clinical, chromosomal, and serum markers into a single nomogram/model are under way. However, as of yet these approaches are far from widespread acceptance.[29]

A variety of chemotherapy regimens are used in CLL. See Chemotherapy Regimens, below, and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment Protocols. These regimens may include nucleoside analogues, alkylating agents, and biologics, often in combination. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only known curative therapy. Complete response (CR) is defined by absence of lymphocytosis, lymphadenopathy, and organomegaly without significant cytopenias.

Patients with CLL are prone to infections, both common and unusual. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccines are recommended. Growth factors may be used to decrease the duration of neutropenia following chemotherapy.

Next

Chemotherapy Regimens

Nucleoside analogues constitute a class of drugs with major activity against indolent lymphoid malignancies, including CLL.[1] Agents in this class include fludarabine, cladribine, and pentostatin. Fludarabine is the most extensively studied of these nucleoside analogues and is currently the most commonly used first-line therapy in CLL.

It should be noted that many clinical trials in CLL represent a younger population, which can tolerate aggressive chemotherapy regimens to show impressive results.

While chlorambucil is a forgotten drug in the United States, likely primarily due to low cost, it is still used as first-line in elderly, fragile populations in Europe, which make up the bulk of true CLL cases. In the CLL5 study comparing fludarabine with chlorambucil (median age 70 y), while there was significantly higher response rate with fludarabine, progression-free survival was similar (19 vs 18 mo). Overall survival was not significantly affected either, although it was 46 months with fludarabine compared with 64 months for chlorambucil.[30]

Ibrutinib is approved for first-line treatment in elderly patients. Approval was based on the RESONATE-2 study (n=269) that compared ibrutinib to chlorambucil in treatment-naïve patients with CLL who were aged 65 y or older. Statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate was observed with ibrutinib compared with chlorambucil.[31]

Various combination regimens have shown improved response rates in several randomized trials but also have failed to show any survival advantage. Common combination regimens include the following:

  • Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) [3, 4]
  • Pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (PCR)
  • Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (FCM)
  • Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP)
  • Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP)

A study by Robak et al showed that cladribine or fludarabine, in combination with cyclophosphamide, are equally effective in previously untreated progressive CLL.[32] The authors concluded that cladribine or fludarabine and cyclophosphamide are safe first-line regimens for progressive CLL; however, both combinations have unsatisfactory activity in patients with 17p13 (TP53 gene) deletion.

A bendamustine/rituximab combination has had some renewed interest. In a German phase II study of 72 pretreated patients, overall response rate was 59%, and PFS was almost 15 months.[33]

Bendamustine

A phase III trial comparing bendamustine to chlorambucil in treatment-naive patients who were not deemed candidates for more aggressive regimens like FCR, showed no improvement in overall survival but did show complete response (21% vs 10%) and progression-free survival (21 months vs 9 months) favoring bendamustine without compromising quality of life.[34]

Alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody directed at CD52 that is approved for use in CLL as both a first-line agent and for salvage in patients with fludarabine-refractory disease. Alemtuzumab has been shown to be effective in treating CLL with p53 mutations [del(17p13.1)]. This is in contrast to rituximab, which is not effective in p53 mutation–bearing CLL. Although very effective in clearing the bone marrow of disease, alemtuzumab has shown only limited activity in clearing bulky lymphadenopathy.

Alemtuzumab appears to have a role in consolidation therapy for the elimination of minimal residual disease (MRD).[23, 24, 35, 36] In one study, 38% of patients treated with alemtuzumab consolidation after induction chemotherapy had molecular disease remission. Of note, 3 patients in this study developed Epstein-Barr virus–positive large B-cell lymphoma; 2 of these lymphomas resolved spontaneously and the third responded to cidofovir and immunoglobulin.

Two phase II studies have evaluated aggressive regimens CFAR (FCR and alemtuzumab) for high-risk CLL as frontline[37] and salvage treatment.[38] Although the median PFS was 38 months and the median OS was not reached in the frontline study, the therapy may be of interest as a regimen to achieve CR in the 17p deletion CLL population before allogeneic stem cell transplantation in selected patients with excellent performance status.

In pretreated patients, when used as salvage and compared with FCR, the addition of alemtuzumab to FCR did not show any improvement in PFS or OS. Serious infections developed in 74% of patients at some point during or after treatment.[38]

The German CLL Study Group prematurely closed a phase III trial involving alemtuzumab consolidation due to severe infections in the alemtuzumab arm; however, this has not been seen in other studies to date.

Antiviral prophylaxis and prophylactic antibiotics for Pneumocystis jiroveci are recommended for use in patients receiving alemtuzumab during and for 2-4 months after treatment, or until their CD4 count is >250x109 cells. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is also recommended to monitor for CMV reactivation. If CMV is detected, alemtuzumab should be discontinued, and appropriate treatment initiated until CMV becomes undetectable.

A 2012 Cochrane Database review including 5 randomized controlled trials (845 patients) failed to show improvement in survival or progression-free survival when alemtuzumab was compared with rituximab (2 trials). Progression-free survival (but not overall survival) was improved when alemtuzumab was compared with chrlorambucil at the price of increased CMV infections in the alemtuzumab arm (1 trial). In 2 other trials in this review, alemtuzumab was superior to no therapy for overall survival in one trial but one of the two trials had to be closed prematurely due to severe infections in the alemtuzumab group. We thus continue to recommend alemtuzumab only for those patients with p53 mutation (p17) and those who have failed a fludarabine-based regimen, and not as a first-line agent due to its toxicity.[39]

Monoclonal antibodies

Ofatumumab (Arzerra), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is FDA approved for CLL that is refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab.[40] Ofatumumab is also approved for use in combination with chlorambucil for untreated patients with CLL in whom fludarabine-based therapy is inappropriate.[41] Approval was based on results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label study of 447 patients who were not eligible for fludarabine-based therapy. Median progression-free survival was 22.4 months with combined ofatumumab and chlorambucil treatment vs. 13.1 months with chlorambucil monotherapy (P < .001).[42]  In January 2016, ofatumumab’s indication was expanded to include extended treatment as a single agent for patients who are in complete or partial response after at least 2 lines of therapy for recurrent or progressive CLL.[43]

Obinutuzumab (Gazyva) is another CD20-directed cytolytic monoclonal antibody. It was approved by the FDA in November 2013 for previously untreated CLL in combination with chlorambucil. Obinutuzumab is first drug with a breakthrough-therapy designation to receive FDA approval. That means obinutuzumab has the potential to offer a substantial improvement over available therapies for patients with serious or life-threatening diseases.

Approval of obinutuzumab was based on a pivotal phase 3 trial in 356 patients (mean age, 73 y) with previously untreated CLL. Those who received obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil had significantly better median progression-free survival than those treated with chlorambucil alone (23 vs 11.1 mo; P <0.0001). These results effectively end the use of chlorambucil as monotherapy.[44, 45]

Other monoclonal antibodies in development that are undergoing study in CLL include hLL1, epratuzumab, and lumiliximab.

Combination therapy with monoclonal antibodies

Relatively recent trials have investigated the combination of monoclonal antibodies with chemotherapeutic agents. Rituximab as a single agent has shown only partial responses of short duration, but it has been used extensively in combination with chemotherapy drugs (eg, fludarabine). Patients with trisomy 12q may express higher levels of CD20, thus making tumor cells more vulnerable to biologics against CD20.[46]

Fludarabine has been shown to downregulate CD55 and CD59; these are proteins involved in complement resistance, and their loss enhances the action of rituximab. Fludarabine combined with rituximab has been shown to have higher clinical remission rates than fludarabine alone in clinical trials.

The combination of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide with rituximab (FCR) has shown clinical response rates of 76% in trials. This result is better than those seen with either fludarabine or FC in salvage therapy for patients with previously treated CLL.

Robak et al found that outcome in patients with previously treated CLL was significantly better with FCR than with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone (FC).[47] Their study compared 6 cycles of FCR (n = 276) with 6 cycles of FC (n = 276). After a median follow-up time of 25 months, progression-free survival was significantly higher with FCR than with FC (median, 30.6 versus 20.6 mo, respectively).[47]

In addition, patients receiving FCR demonstrated significantly better event-free survival, response rate, complete response rate, duration of response, and time to new CLL treatment or death.

A prospective, single-arm study of patients treated initially with fludarabine and rituximab reported that median overall survival was 85 months.[48] After 5 years, 71% of patients were alive and 27% remained free of disease.

Another study found that the addition of rituximab to a standard chemotherapy regimen of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide improved efficacy with little increase in toxicity.[49] The combination of cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, alemtuzumab, and rituximab (CFAR) is currently under study in clinical trials.

A phase III study is under way in Europe that compares fludarabine with and without alemtuzumab. Alemtuzumab with rituximab appears to be well tolerated and have a high response rate; however, a short time to progression indicates that perhaps the dosing schedule needs further refinement.

The combination of obinutuzumab/chlorambucil was found to be superior to rituximab/chlorambucil in a study of 781 treatment-naive CLL patients who were randomized to treatment with chlorambucil alone, obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil, or rituximab plus chlorambucil.[50]

In the study, obinutuzumab/chlorambucil demonstrated more antileukemia activity than rituximab/chlorambucil. Median progression-free survival was 27 months in the obinutuzumab/chlorambucil group, compared with 15 months in the rituximab/chlorambucil group. The overall response rate was also higher in the obinutuzumab/chlorambucil group (78% vs 65%). At the end of treatment, minimum residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow was 19.5% in patients who received obinutuzumab/chlorambucil, versus 2.6% in patients who received rituximab/chlorambucil, and MRD in blood was 37.7% and 3.3%, respectively.[50]

Ibrutinib

In February 2014, the FDA approved ibrutinib for CLL in patients who had received at least one previous therapy. Accelerated approval was based on of a clinical study of 48 previously treated participants. On average, participants were diagnosed with CLL 6.7 years prior to the study and had received four previous therapies. All study participants received ibrutinib 420 mg/day PO until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The results show an overall response rate of nearly 58%. At the time of the study, the duration of response ranged from 5.6 to 24.2 months. An improvement in survival or disease-related symptoms has not been established.[51]

In July 2014, the FDA approved an expanded indication for ibrutinib for the treatment of CLL patients with a deletion in chromosome 17, which is associated with poor response to standard treatments.[52] Approval of the expanded indication was based on an analysis of a subgroup of 127 CLL patients with 17p deletion from the RESONATE study, in which patients treated with ibrutinib experienced a 75% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death.[52, 53]

In March 2016, the FDA further expanded the indication for ibrutinib to include treatment-naïve patients. Approval was based on the RESONATE-2 study (n=269) that compared ibrutinib to chlorambucil in treatment-naïve patients with CLL who were 65 years of age or older. During a median follow-up of 18.4 months, PFS was significantly longer with ibrutinib than with chlorambucil (median, not reached vs. 18.9 mo), with a risk of progression or death that was 84% lower with ibrutinib than with chlorambucil (P<0.001). Ibrutinib significantly prolonged overall survival (estimated 98% vs 85%) with a relative risk of death that was 84% lower in the ibrutinib group than in the chlorambucil group (P=0.001).[31]

Idelalisib

In July 2014, the FDA approved the oral kinase inhibitor idelalisib for the treatment of relapsed CLL, relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma.[54, 55] The drug was approved for the relapsed CLL indication for use in combination with rituximab. Approval was based on a placebo-controlled study in 220 patients in which patients treated with idelalisib plus rituximab showed significantly longer progression-free survival (10.7 months) than those who received placebo plus rituximab (5.5 months).[42]

Venetoclax

Venetoclax (Venclexta) was approved by the FDA in April 2016 for patients with CLL with 17p deletion, as detected by an FDA-approved test, who have received at least one prior therapy. It is a selective inhibitor of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) regulator protein, an antiapoptotic protein. Approval was based on an open-label, multicenter clinical trial of 106 previously treated patients with CLL and 17p deletion, venetoclax was initiated with a weekly ramp-up schedule starting at 20 mg and increasing up to 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and finally 400 mg once daily. Treatment was continued with 400 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median time on treatment at the time of evaluation was 12.1 months (range: 0 to 21.5 months). The primary efficacy endpoint, overall response rate (ORR), was 80%. The median time to first response was 0.8 months (range: 0.1 to 8.1 months). Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached with approximately 12 months of median follow-up. The DOR ranged from 2.9 to 19-plus months.[71]

Lenalidomide

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) currently approved for use in multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndrome with deletion of chromosome 5q. Studies have utilized this medication in treatment of patients with relapsed and refractory CLL.[56] Response rates of 47-38% with complete response rates of 9% and elimination of MRD have also been reported.

Chemotherapy and elderly patients

Although CLL is common in the elderly, few studies have included older patients, who typically cannot tolerate aggressive chemotherapy regimens. However, 2 studies have suggested that chlorambucil plus rituximab is safe and effective in older patients with CLL. The studies evaluated the effectiveness of different regimens in patients aged 70 years or older. They compared the effects of chlorambucil, fludarabine, fludarabine plus rituximab (FR), fludarabine with consolidation alemtuzumab, and FR with consolidation alemtuzumab.[57, 58]

Previous
Next

Transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is the only known curative therapy. The optimal timing of transplantation is still being investigated[59] ; however, it is known that delay of transplantation until development of refractory disease results in worse outcomes. However, remember that most patients are elderly and too fragile to consider upfront stem-cell transplantation in first clinical remission.

The effectiveness of nonmyeloablative transplantation has shown that there is a graft versus leukemia effect in CLL. Autologous transplantation after high-dose conditioning has not been shown to provide a survival advantage and is not recommended outside the setting of a clinical trial.

Alemtuzumab is being investigated for use in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This agent may play an important role in the elimination of MRD in patients undergoing autologous transplantation, while, at the same time, the lack of CD52 on hematopoietic stem cells prevents interference with stem cell collection.

The addition of alemtuzumab to nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for allogeneic HSCT appears to decrease the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD), but it may be associated with increased rates of cytomegalovirus reactivation.

A study by Michallet et al indicated that patients who had responded to first-line or second-line therapy experienced a longer duration of time until progression, death, or subsequent treatment if they underwent autologous stem cell transplantation instead of observation.[60]

Previous
Next

Autoimmune Manifestations

Autoimmune manifestations in CLL are myriad, as follows[61] :

  • Positive DAT (Coombs test) without autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA)
  • AIHA
  • Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)
  • Pure red cell aplasia
  • Autoimmune neutropenia
  • Cold agglutinin disease
  • Paraneoplastic pemphigus
  • Neuropathies
  • Evans syndrome

Up to 25% of patients with CLL demonstrate autoimmune anemia, thrombocytopenia, or both. Simultaneously, immune incompetence is present, characterized by a progressive profound hypogammaglobulinemia, predisposing patients to a number of infections, the most common being bacterial pneumonias.

Patients experiencing frequent bacterial infections associated with hypogammaglobulinemia are likely to benefit from monthly infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Studies of prophylactic IVIG in patients with CLL have not demonstrated a survival benefit, but have shown a significant decrease in the occurrence of major infections and a significant reduction in clinically documented infections.[62]

Prednisone alone, usually in a dose of 20-60 mg daily initially, with subsequent gradual dose reduction, may be useful in patients with AIHA. Rituximab, alone or as part of a combination regimen, can be very effective in eliminating the B-cell clone that induces autoimmune disorders, particularly for patients with autoimmune thrombocytopenia. IVIG can be used as a short-term measure in patients who have severe thrombocytopenias or pending surgery. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists have been used with some success as in primary ITP.[63]

The previous notion that purine analogs are more prone to result in autoimmune cytopenias has been recently challenged by data from studies such as the UK CLL4 trial.[64]

Extremely high white blood cell counts (>300,000/µL) may produce a hyperviscosity syndrome with altered central nervous system function and/or respiratory insufficiency. Leukocytapheresis and urgent therapy with prednisone and chemotherapy may be required. Virtually all patients requiring therapy should also be given allopurinol to prevent uric acid nephropathy.

Occasionally, nonimmune manifestations due to antibodies may occur, such as renal toxicity from monoclonal gammopathy due to CLL.[65]

Previous
Next

Splenectomy

Refractory splenomegaly and pancytopenia is a common problem in patients with advanced CLL. Occasionally, these patients require splenectomy. Substantial improvements in hemoglobin and platelet counts are observed in up to 90% of patients undergoing splenectomy. All patients with CLL who are to undergo splenectomy should be immunized at least 1 week in advance against the pneumococcus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Muhammad A Mir, MD, FACP Assistant Professor of Medicine (Hematology, Blood/Marrow Transplant) Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine

Muhammad A Mir, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hematology, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Clinical Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Haleem J Rasool, MD, FACP Chair, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Health System, La Crosse, WI

Haleem J Rasool, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Delong Liu, MD, PhD Professor of Medicine, Division of Oncology/Hematology, New York Medical College; Chief of Hematology, Phelps Memorial Hospital Center; Director of Non-ablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Program, Westchester Medical Center; Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Hematology and Oncology

Delong Liu, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hematology, American Society of Clinical Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Samir C Patel, MD Fellow, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, New York Medical College

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Emmanuel C Besa, MD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Emmanuel C Besa, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Education, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American College of Clinical Pharmacology, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Hematology, New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Michael Perry, MD, MS, MACP† Former Nellie B Smith Chair of Oncology Emeritus, Former Director, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Former Deputy Director, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine

Clarence Sarkodee-Adoo, MD Consulting Staff, Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, City of Hope Samaritan BMT Program

Disclosure: Takeda Millenium Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Elter T, Hallek M, Engert A. Fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006 Aug. 7(12):1641-51. [Medline].

  2. PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board. Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment (PDQ®): Health Professional Version. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; January 29, 2016. [Full Text].

  3. Klepfish A, Gilles L, Ioannis K, Eliezer R, Ami S. Enhancing the action of rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by adding fresh frozen plasma: complement/rituximab interactions & clinical results in refractory CLL. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Sep. 1173:865-73. [Medline].

  4. Badoux XC, Keating MJ, Wang X, et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab chemoimmunotherapy is highly effective treatment for relapsed patients with CLL. Blood. 2011 Jan 18. [Medline].

  5. Zenz T, Benner A, Duhrsen U, Durig J, Dohner H, Siffert W, et al. BCL2-938C>A polymorphism and disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009 Sep 11. 1-6. [Medline].

  6. Nicoloso MS, Kipps TJ, Croce CM, Calin GA. MicroRNAs in the pathogeny of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2007 Dec. 139(5):709-16. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. Hanlon K, Rudin CE, Harries LW. Investigating the targets of MIR-15a and MIR-16-1 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PLoS One. 2009 Sep 25. 4(9):e7169. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Fabbri M, Bottoni A, Shimizu M, et al. Association of a microRNA/TP53 feedback circuitry with pathogenesis and outcome of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. JAMA. 2011 Jan 5. 305(1):59-67. [Medline].

  9. Wang L, Lawrence MS, Wan Y, et al. SF3B1 and other novel cancer genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29. 365(26):2497-506. [Medline].

  10. Slager SL, Kay NE. Familial Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: What Does it Mean to Me?. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009 Sep 1. 9:S194-S197. [Medline].

  11. Berndt SI, Camp NJ, Skibola CF, Vijai J, Wang Z, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies discovers multiple loci for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Commun. 2016 Mar 9. 7:10933. [Medline].

  12. Cancer Facts & Figures 2016. American Cancer Society. Available at http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-047079.pdf. Accessed: March 10, 2016.

  13. Rai KR, Keating HJ. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Holland JF, Bast RC, Morton DL, et al, eds. Cancer Medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1997. Vol II: 2697-728.

  14. Kristinsson SY, Dickman PW, Wilson WH, et al. Improved survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the past decade: a population-based study including 11,179 patients diagnosed between 1973-2003 in Sweden. Haematologica. 2009 Sep. 94(9):1259-65. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Maurer MJ, Cerhan JR, Katzmann JA, et al. Monoclonal and polyclonal serum free light chains and clinical outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011 Sep 8. 118(10):2821-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008 Jun 15. 111(12):5446-56. [Medline].

  17. Bouley J, Deriano L, Delic J, Merle-Béral H. New molecular markers in resistant B-CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 May. 47(5):791-801. [Medline].

  18. Abbott BL. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Oncologist. 2006 Jan. 11(1):21-30. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  19. Zwiebel JA, Cheson BD. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: staging and prognostic factors. Semin Oncol. 1998 Feb. 25(1):42-59. [Medline].

  20. [Guideline] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas Version 2. 2016. NCCN. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nhl.pdf. Accessed: March 11, 2016.

  21. Parikh SA, Strati P, Tsang M, West CP, Shanafelt TD. Should IGHV status and FISH testing be performed in all CLL patients at diagnosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2016 Feb 3. 39 (8A):935-7. [Medline].

  22. Hillmen P, Skotnicki AB, Robak T, et al. Alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10. 25(35):5616-23. [Medline].

  23. Montillo M, Tedeschi A, Miqueleiz S, et al. Alemtuzumab as consolidation after a response to fludarabine is effective in purging residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 20. 24(15):2337-42. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Moreton P, Kennedy B, Lucas G, et al. Eradication of minimal residual disease in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia after alemtuzumab therapy is associated with prolonged survival. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 1. 23(13):2971-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  25. Visone R, Veronese A, Rassenti LZ, et al. miR-181b is a biomarker of disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011 Sep 15. 118(11):3072-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  26. Rai KR, Sawitsky A, Cronkite EP, et al. Clinical staging of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1975 Aug. 46(2):219-34. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  27. Bosch F, Ferrer A, Villamor N, et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone as initial therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: high response rate and disease eradication. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jan 1. 14(1):155-61. [Medline].

  28. Byrd JC, Gribben JG, Peterson BL, et al. Select high-risk genetic features predict earlier progression following chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine and rituximab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: justification for risk-adapted therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20. 24(3):437-43. [Medline].

  29. Wierda WG, O'Brien S, Wang X, et al. Multivariable model for time to first treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1. 29(31):4088-95. [Medline].

  30. Eichhorst BF, Busch R, Stilgenbauer S, et al. First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009 Oct 15. 114(16):3382-91. [Medline].

  31. Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, Robak T, Owen C, Ghia P, et al. Ibrutinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17. 373 (25):2425-37. [Medline].

  32. Robak T, Jamroziak K, Gora-Tybor J, et al. Comparison of cladribine plus cyclophosphamide with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase III randomized study by the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG-CLL3 Study). J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10. 28(11):1863-9. [Medline].

  33. Fischer K, Cramer P, Busch R, et al. Bendamustine combined with rituximab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 10. 29(26):3559-66. [Medline].

  34. Knauf WU, Lissitchkov T, Aldaoud A, Liberati AM, Loscertales J, Herbrecht R, et al. Bendamustine compared with chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: updated results of a randomized phase III trial. Br J Haematol. 2012 Oct. 159(1):67-77. [Medline].

  35. Nabhan C, Coutré S, Hillmen P. Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: is it ready for primetime?. Br J Haematol. 2007 Feb. 136(3):379-92. [Medline].

  36. Sayala HA, Rawstron AC, Hillmen P. Minimal residual disease assessment in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2007 Sep. 20(3):499-512. [Medline].

  37. Parikh SA, Keating MJ, O'Brien S, et al. Frontline chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, alemtuzumab, and rituximab for high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011 Aug 25. 118(8):2062-8. [Medline].

  38. Badoux XC, Keating MJ, Wang X, et al. Cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, alemtuzumab, and rituximab as salvage therapy for heavily pretreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011 Aug 25. 118(8):2085-93. [Medline].

  39. Skoetz N, Bauer K, Elter T, Monsef I, Roloff V, Hallek M, et al. Alemtuzumab for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012.

  40. Lemery SJ, Zhang J, Rothmann MD, Yang J, Earp J, Zhao H. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval: ofatumumab for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 1. 16(17):4331-8. [Medline].

  41. Nelson R. FDA Grants Full Approval to Ofatumumab (Arzerra) for CLL. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/823837. Accessed: March 10, 2016.

  42. Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE, Cheson BD, Pagel JM, Hillmen P, et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 13. 370(11):997-1007. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  43. van Oers MH, Kuliczkowski K, Smolej L, Petrini M, Offner F, Grosicki S, et al. Ofatumumab maintenance versus observation in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (PROLONG): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct. 16 (13):1370-9. [Medline].

  44. Goede V, Fischer K, Humphrey K, Asikanius E, Busch R, Engelke A, et al. Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus chlorambucil (Clb) or rituximab (R) plus Clb versus Clb alone in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and preexisting medical conditions (comorbidities): Final stage 1 results of the CLL11 (BO21004) phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 7004).

  45. B McCall. Obinutuzumab Active in Elderly Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Medscape Medical News from the: 18th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA). June 21, 2013. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/806700. Accessed: November 11, 2013.

  46. Mougalian SS, O'Brien S. Adverse prognostic features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncology (Williston Park). 2011 Jul. 25(8):692-6, 699. [Medline].

  47. Robak T, Dmoszynska A, Solal-Celigny P, et al. Rituximab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide prolongs progression-free survival compared with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1. 28(10):1756-65. [Medline].

  48. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, Peterson BL, Gribben JG, Morrison VA, et al. Chemoimmunotherapy With Fludarabine and Rituximab Produces Extended Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Long-Term Follow-Up of CALGB Study 9712. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1. 29(10):1349-55. [Medline].

  49. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2. 376(9747):1164-74. [Medline].

  50. Nelson R. New Drug Combo Potentially 'Practice Changing' in CLL. Medscape [serial online]. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/817454. Accessed: December 16, 2013.

  51. Byrd JC, Furman RR, Coutre SE, Flinn IW, Burger JA, Blum KA, et al. Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 4. 369(1):32-42. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  52. Chustecka Z. Ibrutinib in CLL: indication expanded, benefit confirmed. July 28, 2014. [Full Text].

  53. Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, Barrientos JC, Kay NE, Reddy NM, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 17. 371 (3):213-23. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  54. Chustecka Z. Idelalisib (Zydelig) approved for CLL and lymphoma. Medscape Medical News. July 23, 2014. [Full Text].

  55. FDA news release: FDA approves Zydelig for three types of blood cancers. US Food and Drug Administration. July 23, 2014. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm406387.htm.

  56. Molica S. Immunomodulatory drugs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a new treatment paradigm. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 May. 48(5):866-9. [Medline].

  57. Boggs W. Chlorambucil Effective for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Elderly. Medscape Medical News. December 13, 2012. [Full Text].

  58. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Rai K, Lin TS, Geyer S, Kolitz J, et al. Impact of Age on Outcomes After Initial Therapy With Chemotherapy and Different Chemoimmunotherapy Regimens in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of Sequential Cancer and Leukemia Group B Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10. [Medline].

  59. Gribben JG, Hosing C, Maloney DG. Stem cell transplantation for indolent lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan. 17(1 Suppl):S63-70. [Medline].

  60. Michallet M, Dreger P, Sutton L, et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of European intergroup randomized trial comparing autografting versus observation. Blood. 2011 Feb 3. 117(5):1516-1521. [Medline].

  61. Hodgson K, Ferrer G, Montserrat E, Moreno C. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and autoimmunity: a systematic review. Haematologica. 2011 May. 96(5):752-61. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  62. Raanani P, Gafter-Gvili A, Paul M, Ben-Bassat I, Leibovici L, Shpilberg O. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009 May. 50(5):764-72. [Medline].

  63. Koehrer S, Keating MJ, Wierda WG. Eltrombopag, a second-generation thrombopoietin receptor agonist, for chronic lymphocytic leukemia-associated ITP. Leukemia. 2010 May. 24(5):1096-8. [Medline].

  64. Borthakur G, O'Brien S, Wierda WG, et al. Immune anaemias in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab--incidence and predictors. Br J Haematol. 2007 Mar. 136(6):800-5. [Medline].

  65. Moulin B, Ronco PM, Mougenot B, Francois A, Fillastre JP, Mignon F. Glomerulonephritis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related B-cell lymphomas. Kidney Int. 1992 Jul. 42(1):127-35. [Medline].

  66. Chustecka Z. Ibrutinib (Imbruvica) Approved for CLL in US. Medscape [serial online]. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/820537. Accessed: February 19, 2014.

  67. FDA News Release. FDA approves Gazyva for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Medscape [serial online]. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm373209.htm. Accessed: November 4, 2013.

  68. FDA News Release. FDA approves Imbruvica to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available at http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm385764.htm. Accessed: February 19, 2014.

  69. Nelson R. FDA Gives Arzerra Breakthrough Therapy Designation for CLL. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/811307. Accessed: September 24, 2013.

  70. Shanafelt T, Lanasa MC, Call TG, et al. Ofatumumab-based chemoimmunotherapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Cancer. 2013 Aug 6. [Medline].

  71. Venclexta (venetoclax) [package insert]. North Chicago, IL: AbbVie, Inc. April 2016. Available at [Full Text].

 
Previous
Next
 
Peripheral smear from a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic variety.
Peripheral smear from a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, large lymphocytic variety. Smudge cells are also observed; smudge cells are the artifacts produced by the lymphocytes damaged during the slide preparation.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.