Episiotomy and Repair Technique
- Author: Justin R Lappen, MD; Chief Editor: Christine Isaacs, MD more...
In an episiotomy, the perineum is incised with scissors or a scalpel as the infant’s head is crowning. Two types of episiotomy have been described: midline (median) and mediolateral (see the image below). Generally, midline episiotomies are more commonly performed in the United States, whereas mediolateral episiotomies are more common in other parts of the world.
The incision is generally repaired after delivery of the placenta is completed. Repair of an episiotomy should take place in a setting that contains appropriate instruments, exposure, and lighting.
A midline episiotomy may be performed after adequate anesthesia has been confirmed. Protecting the fetal head during the procedure is of utmost importance. Generally, the index and middle fingers are inserted into the vagina between the fetal head and the perineum. This maneuver provides space for making the incision.
A vertical incision is made in the midline of the perineum from the posterior fourchette toward the anus. Most commonly, the incision is made just before delivery of the fetal head, at the time when the perineum is thinned and stretched. At present, however, the evidence is insufficient to establish any particular time as the most appropriate for performing an episiotomy.
Repair of any perineal laceration, including episiotomy, serves the following 2 important functions:
Tissue reapproximation for lacerated vaginal mucosa, soft tissue, and muscle
Accordingly, delivering providers must have a comprehensive understanding of perineal anatomy.
Various types of sutures have been used for episiotomy repair, and only limited evidence suggests the superiority of one material over another. Both chromic catgut and synthetic materials have been used successfully, and many providers now prefer braided standard or rapid-absorption polyglycolic acid sutures (typically Vicryl, Polysorb), given their minimally reactive nature. Additionally, monofilament sutures with more rapid absorption, such as Caproysn, may be used for perineal laceration repair.
Generally, the smallest-diameter suture that provides adequate tensile and knot strength for the surgical task should be used. In most instances, 2-0 and 3-0 sutures are suitable for reapproximation and repair of soft tissue in an episiotomy repair. For optimal visualization, repair should take place in a labor and delivery room or an operating room with appropriate lighting.
The ensuing description focuses on a standard episiotomy repair without extension, which is equivalent to a second-degree perineal laceration. A thorough examination of the perineum should always be performed to evaluate for extension to a third- or fourth-degree laceration. Further information regarding repair of third- and fourth-degrees lacerations is available in several standard obstetric references.[19, 21, 22, 23]
The repair is initiated by placing a suture approximately 1 cm proximal to the apex of the laceration within the vagina. The suture is secured with a knot, and the repair is continued in a continuous fashion (locked or nonlocked) to the level of the hymenal ring. The vaginal mucosa and submucosal tissue must be sufficiently reapproximated with the continuous suture, and all dead space must be closed. Careful attention must be directed to preventing sutures from passing deep enough to traverse the rectal mucosa.
Next, the hymen is reapproximated with the suture in a nonlocked fashion. This suture is then tucked through the hymenal ring posterior to the perineal body for the remainder of the repair. At this point, the muscular tissue of the perineal body is reapproximated; this includes an interrupted “crown stitch” of the bulbocavernosus muscles and interrupted or running sutures of the transverse perineal muscles.
The suture is then run posteriorly to the posterior apex of the incision to reapproximate the remainder of the perineal body. This is followed by a subcuticular skin closure run anteriorly to the introitus. Finally, the suture is secured with a knot inside the hymenal ring.
As with a midline episiotomy, the data are insufficient to determine the optimal time for performing a mediolateral episiotomy. Most surgeons recommend making the incision immediately before delivery. The index and middle fingers are placed into the vagina between the fetal head and the perineum.
An incision is begun at the posterior fourchette and continued downward at an angle of at least 45° relative to the perineal body. The angle of the incision may approach 90° (perpendicular to the posterior fourchette) if the perineum is significantly stretched by the fetal head, so that upon relaxation of the perineum the angle will approach 45°. The incision can be performed on either side and is generally 3-4 cm in length.
The anatomic structures involved in a mediolateral episiotomy include the vaginal epithelium, transverse perineal muscle, bulbocavernosus muscle, and perineal skin. A deep or large mediolateral episiotomy may expose the ischiorectal fossa.
First, the delivering provider should examine the extent of the laceration after delivery, carefully evaluating for possible extension to third- or fourth-degree laceration. Either 2-0 or 3-0 sutures (of the same materials as used for midline episiotomy) may be used for the repair.
With 2 fingers placed in the vagina for retraction, the apex of the episiotomy site is identified, and a suture is secured approximately 1 cm proximally. The submucosal tissue and vaginal mucosa are reapproximated in a continuous fashion (either nonlocked or locked). A deep episiotomy or laceration may require additional submucosal sutures for appropriate tissue reapproximation and closure of dead space.
The bulbospongiosus muscle generally must be repaired. The fascial sheath of the muscle on both sides of the incision should be repaired in an interrupted fashion before closure of the skin, which is performed with a subcuticular stitch. Sutures should be placed perpendicular to the angle of the incision to prevent anatomic distortion of the perineum and vaginal opening.
Bleeding is one of the most common complications of episiotomy. The perineum and surrounding tissues have an extensive vasculature, and the blood supply to these areas is increased by the physiologic changes of pregnancy and labor.
Immediately after delivery, the episiotomy site should be inspected for bleeding. Because episiotomy is usually performed at the time of crowning, it sometimes happens that an incision is made through blood vessels that have been rendered invisible by compression from the fetal head. Inspection should include an evaluation for arterial bleeding, which may require suture ligation.
Typical episiotomy site bleeding can generally be controlled with conservative measures (eg, compression) while the repair is being performed to achieve hemostasis. Because of muscle involvement, a mediolateral episiotomy may give rise to more bleeding than a midline episiotomy. Careful inspection prior to and during the repair is required to assess for hematoma formation, which can cause significant maternal morbidity in the rare instances in which deep hematomas dissect proximally toward the upper vagina and the broad ligament.
Extension to higher-order lacerations
Another common complication of episiotomy is extension to higher-order perineal lacerations. Among primiparous women, the reported risk of third- or fourth-degree lacerations is 1% without an episiotomy, 9% with a mediolateral episiotomy, and 20% with a midline episiotomy. Performance of a midline episiotomy may be the biggest risk factor for extension of a laceration into the rectum.[8, 9]
Close inspection and examination of the incision after delivery is of utmost importance; failure to identify an extension or higher-order laceration can result in infection, dehiscence, fecal incontinence, or fistula formation. Various perineal techniques (eg, warm compresses) may also be used in an effort to reduce perineal trauma.
Because the site of the episiotomy is heavily colonized by bacteria and frequently contaminated by fecal matter during the process of delivery, a significant risk of infection exists. Infection generally manifests within the first week following delivery. Signs and symptoms of episiotomy infection include fever, focal tenderness at the wound site, and purulent or malodorous drainage.
Most episiotomy infections are localized and respond to appropriate wound care and oral antibiotics. If an abscess forms, drainage may be required, or spontaneous wound breakdown may ensue. In rare cases, necrotizing fasciitis may occur; this can be life-threatening if not appropriately evaluated and treated.
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended after an episiotomy or repair of an obstetric laceration. However, infection increases the risk of perineal repair breakdown, particularly for higher order (third- or fourth-degree) lacerations. Because breakdown of higher order lacerations may result in incontinence of stool or flatus, sexual dysfunction, or rectovaginal fistula, the use of prophylactic antibiotics in this setting has been evaluated.
Data from a single randomized trial suggests that administration of a second-generation cephalosporin (cefoxitin or cefotetan; if penicillin allergy, clindamycin) decreases the risk of perineal wound complications. However, this study had a high rate of loss to follow-up (27%), and its findings have not been replicated in other studies.
Given the lack of evidence following a meta-analysis of data from the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's trial register, Buppasiri et al indicated that additional data are necessary before routine antibiotic prophylaxis for third- or fourth-degree perineal tears is recommended. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) also does not recommend universal prophylaxis due to lack of evidence, but the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) recommends routine prophylaxis owing to the severity of the outcomes following infection.
Breakdown of an episiotomy repair is infrequent (< 2% of cases of higher-order lacerations) but may be a particularly challenging complication for patients and providers. Dehiscence can occur with or without wound infection. Small defects may heal spontaneously without closure; however, many defects require surgical closure.
Historically, delayed closure (2-3 months after delivery) was performed. Over the past 20 years, early closure has been reported to represent an appropriate and successful approach.[32, 33, 34] . Measures such as debridement or parenteral antibiotic therapy may be necessary before wound closure.
Ould F. A Treatise on Midwifery in Three Parts. Dublin: Nelson & Connor; 1742.
DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1920. 1:34-44.
Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretive review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 1983. 38(6):322-38.
Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers D. The West Berkshire perineal management trial. BMJ. 1984. 289(6445):587-90.
DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ, Podgornik MN. 2003 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance data; No. 359. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2005. Retrieved December 29, 2005. [Full Text].
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005. 54(2):1-116.
Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. (1):CD000081.
Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005. 293(17):2141-8.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Episiotomy. ACOG Practice Bulletin #71. Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 107:957-62.
Haelle T. ACOG: New Recommendations on Obstetric Lacerations. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/865296. June 24, 2016; Accessed: June 24, 2016.
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. London: RCOG Press; 2007.
The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears. RCOG. Green-top Guideline No. 29. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-29.pdf. Published online June 12, 2015; Accessed: June 24, 2016.
Barclay L. RCOG Guidelines Update Management of Severe Perineal Tears. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/846503. June 15, 2015; Accessed: June 26, 2016.
Chauhan SP, Gherman R, Hendrix NW, Bingham JM, Hayes E. Shoulder dystocia: comparison of the ACOG practice bulletin with another national guideline. Am J Perinatol. 2010 Feb. 27(2):129-36. [Medline].
Paris AE, Greenberg JA, Ecker JL, McElrath TF. Is an episiotomy necessary with a shoulder dystocia?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep. 205(3):217.e1-3. [Medline].
Varner MW. Episiotomy: techniques and indications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986. 29:309.
Quilligan EJ, Zuspan F. Douglass-Stromme Operative Obstetrics. 5th ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1988. 698.
Hale RW, Ling FW. Episiotomy: Procedure and Repair Techniques. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2007.
Kilpatrick S, Garrison E. Normal labor and delivery. Gabbe S, ed. Obstetrics, Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2007. 303-21.
Gilstrap LC III, Cunningham FG, VanDorsten JP. Operative Obstetrics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
Graves CR. Obstetric problems. Rock JA, Jones HW III, eds. TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. 825-41.
Toglia MR. Repair of episiotomy and perineal lacerations associated with childbirth. UpToDate, Version 19.3. August 2011.
Owen J, Hauth, JC. Episiotomy infection and dehiscence. Gilstrap LC III, Faro S, eds. Infections in Pregnancy. New York: Alan R Liss; 1990.
Aasheim V, Nilsen AB, Lukasse M, Reinar LM. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7. 12:CD006672. [Medline].
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. Green-top guideline No. 29, March 2007.
Duggal N, Mercado C, Daniels K, Bujor A, Caughey AB, El-Sayed YY. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postpartum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun. 111(6):1268-73. [Medline].
Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Thinkhamrop B. Antibiotic prophylaxis for third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10. CD005125. [Medline].
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 120: use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun. 117(6):1472-83. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Fernando RJ, Williams AA, Adams EJ, on behalf of the Guidelines and Audit Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. London, UK: RCOG. Green-top guideline no. 29. Mar 2007. [Full Text].
Ramin SM, Gilstrap LC 3rd. Episiotomy and early repair of dehiscence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 37:816.
Ramin SM, Ramus RM, Little BB, Gilstrap LC 3rd. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence associated with infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992. 167:1104.
Hankins GD, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC 3rd, et al. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 1990. 75:48.
Arona AJ, al-Marayati L, Grimes DA, Ballard CA. Early secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after outpatient wound preparation. Obstet Gynecol. 1995. 86:294.