Myelodysplastic Syndrome Workup

  • Author: Emmanuel C Besa, MD; Chief Editor: Koyamangalath Krishnan, MD, FRCP, FACP   more...
 
Updated: Oct 10, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

The workup in patients with possible myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) includes a complete blood count with differential, peripheral blood smear, and bone marrow studies. Findings on these studies are used to stage the disease. Because MDS has heterogeneous clinical manifestations and varying clinical outcomes, staging is necessary to determine prognosis and guide the approach to therapy.

Next

Complete Blood Count and Peripheral Blood Smear

Significant changes are found in the blood counts and morphology of patients with MDS. The peripheral blood count may show a single cytopenia (anemia, thrombocytopenia, or neutropenia) in the early phase or bicytopenia (2 deficient cell lines) or pancytopenia (3 deficient cell lines) in later stages.

Anemia varies in degree from mild to severe. It is usually macrocytic (mean cell volume of >100 fL) with oval-shaped RBCs (macro-ovalocytes). It is usually dimorphic (2 or more populations), with a normal or a hypochromic microcytic population (RARS) coexisting with the macrocytes. Punctate basophilia is observed in RBCs.

Neutropenia may vary from mild to severe. Morphologic abnormalities are often observed in the granulocytes. These can include bilobed or unsegmented nuclei (pseudo–Pelger-Huet abnormality) or hypersegmentation on the nuclei (6-7 lobes) similar to megaloblastic diseases.

Granulation abnormalities vary from an absence of granules to abnormal distribution inside the cytoplasm (Dohle bodies).

Platelet counts are decreased (rarely increased). Abnormalities such as giant hypogranular platelets and megakaryocyte fragments are present.

Previous
Next

Bone Marrow Studies

In most cases, bone marrow changes include hypercellularity with trilineage dysplastic changes. A small number of patients may have a hypocellular marrow. This often overlaps with aplastic anemia. Increased marrow fibrosis may be confused with other MPDs. Dysplastic changes in RBC lineage (dyserythropoiesis) are characteristic. In the absence of vitamin B-12 or folate deficiencies, the bone marrow usually exhibits asynchronous maturation of nuclei and cytoplasm similar to that described in megaloblastic anemias.

Other changes include binuclearity or multinuclearity in the erythroid cell precursor cells and the presence of ringed sideroblasts (iron accumulation in the mitochondria). Refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS) is one of the MDS types in the French-American-British (FAB) Cooperative Group classification system. (See the image below.)

Bone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstratiBone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstrating ring sideroblasts in Prussian blue staining in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.

Dysplastic changes in WBC lineage (dysmyelopoiesis) show myeloid hyperplasia with an increased number of myeloblasts and an expanded myelocyte and metamyelocyte population (midstage bulge). This separates it from acute leukemia (leukemic hiatus or absence of mid stage). In the FAB classification, the percentage of myeloblasts separates RA (< 5%), RAEB (5-20%), RAEB in transformation (>20, < 30%), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; >30%).

The 2008 update of the WHO classification considers single-lineage dysplasia as a valid criterion for diagnosis of MDS, and refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia (RCUD) became an official entity in that classification. In 2004, WHO revised the percentage of blasts that defines AML from 30% to 20%; thus, the RAEB in transformation entity has become officially AML.

Morphologic abnormalities are evident in nuclear-cytoplasm dissociation in maturation and when the pseudo–Pelger forms are also present in bone marrow.

Dysthrombopoiesis in the platelet production cell lineage consists of micromegakaryocytes (dwarf forms) with poor nuclei lobulation and giant platelets budding off from their cytoplasm.

Previous
Next

Cytogenetic Studies

Cytogenetic techniques have evolved from individual chromosome identification by banding techniques to the new, more sensitive color-coded methods. Separating individual chromosomes is dependent on the ability to induce the cell into mitosis to identify abnormalities. The new technique uses fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and color-coded chromosomes to enable observation of the intact cell without requiring mitosis.

Cytogenetic studies of the bone marrow cells indicate mutations into clonal cell lines, with abnormal chromosomes in 48-64% in different series. With higher-resolution techniques (eg, FISH), some practitioners claim a 79% rate of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with primary MDS.

Chromosomal abnormalities are clonal and include 5q-, monosomy 7 (-7) or 7q-, trisomy 8 (+8), and numerous other less frequent abnormalities. Multiple combinations may be present; this indicates a very poor prognosis. A single abnormality, except those involving chromosome 7, usually indicates good prognosis and survival.

The WHO classification is helpful in predicting subgroup differences in prognosis and response to treatment in patients with MDS. Refractory cytopenias are divided into those without (RCMD-) or with multi-lineage dysplasia (RCMD+) and with ringed sideroblasts (RCMD+/+RS) or without ringed sideroblasts (RCMD/-RS).

A new subcategory includes patients with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q (5q-) and less than 5% blasts called the 5q- syndrome. Identification of the syndrome or presence of this particular cytogenetic abnormality is useful because the majority of these patients will respond to the new drug lenalidomide (Revlimid).

Unclassified by the WHO are the group of patients with MDS whose conditions overlap with severe aplastic anemia and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. A group of MDS patients with the FAB-RA subtype who may have a hypoplastic marrow, usually human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR15 phenotype, are young (< 60 y) and may have negative cells to CD55 and CD59 respond to immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or cyclosporin.[11]

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

The presence of dysplastic changes in the peripheral blood smear and trilineage dysplasia and hypercellular marrow in the absence of vitamin deficiency is diagnostic of MDS. The presence of typical chromosomal abnormalities supports the diagnosis and contributes to determining the prognosis of MDS. (See the following images.)

Blood film (1000× magnification) demonstrating a vBlood film (1000× magnification) demonstrating a vacuolated blast in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland. This bone marrow film (400× magnification) demonstThis bone marrow film (400× magnification) demonstrates an almost complete replacement of normal hematopoiesis by blasts in a refractory anemia with an excess of blasts in transformation. Note the signs of abnormal maturation such as vacuolation, double nucleus, and macrocytosis. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland. Bone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstratiBone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstrating ring sideroblasts in Prussian blue staining in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland. Bone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstratiBone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstrating granular and clotlike positive reaction in periodic acid-Schiff staining in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Previous
Next

Staging

An international group of experts, the MDS Risk Analysis Workshop, developed the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for staging MDS.[12] (See Table 2, below.)

Table 2. IPSS Score for Staging MDS[12] (Open Table in a new window)

Prognostic Variable0 Points0.5 Points1 Point1.5 Points2 Points
Bone marrow blasts, %< 55-1011-2021-30
Karyotype*GoodIntermediatePoor
Cytopenias0/12/3
*Good is no abnormality (46,XX or 46,XY), -Y, del(5q), del(20q); intermediate is other abnormalities, such as trisomy 8 (+8); and poor is complex (33 abnormalities or chromosome 7 abnormality [ie, 7q- or -7]).

The first prognostic factor is the amount or percentage of myeloblasts identified in the patient's bone marrow study. Each increase of 10% over the reference range is equivalent to a half point.

The number of cytopenias is scored by the presence of 2-3 (anemia plus thrombocytopenia or neutropenia or pancytopenia), which is worth a half point. The presence of no cytopenias or a single one indicates a good prognosis.

The total score is added, and the patient is staged according to the following:

  • Low: 0
  • Intermediate 1: 0.5-1
  • Intermediate 2: 1.5-2
  • High: ≥ 2.5

Classification of the subtypes or categories of MDS has changed from the FAB classification to the WHO classification. (See Table 3, below.)

Table 3. Categories of FAB Classification Versus WHO Classification for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) (Open Table in a new window)

FAB



Classification



WHO-2004



Classification



WHO-2008



Classification



RARA RCMD 5q-RCUD RCMD 5q-
RARSRARS RCMD-RSRARS RCMD-RS RARS-T
RAEBRAEB-1 RAEB-2RAEB-1 RAEB-2
CMMLCMML-1 CMML-2CMML-1 CMML-2
RAEB-TAMLAML

FAB – French-American-British Cooperative Group; WHO – World Health Organization; RA – Refractory anemia; RARS – RA with ringed sideroblasts; RAEB – RA with excess blasts; RAEB-T – RAEB in transition to AML; AML – Acute myelogenous leukemia; CMML – Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; RCMD – Refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia; RCUD – Refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia

CMML in the FAB classification requires an actual monocyte count of more than 1000/μL with trilineage dysplasia.

WHO classifies CMML into the following:

  • Juvenile and proliferative CMML under MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasma (MPN have more than 13,000/μL monocytes plus splenomegaly.
  • CMML under MDS is limited to monocytosis of less than 13,000/μL with trilineage dysplasia.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Emmanuel C Besa, MD  Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Emmanuel C Besa, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Education, American College of Clinical Pharmacology, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ulrich Josef Woermann, MD  Consulting Staff, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Koyamangalath Krishnan, MD, FRCP, FACP  Paul Dishner Endowed Chair of Excellence in Medicine, Professor of Medicine and Chief of Hematology-Oncology, James H Quillen College of Medicine at East Tennessee State University

Koyamangalath Krishnan, MD, FRCP, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Society of Hematology, and Royal College of Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

References
  1. Besa EC. Myelodysplastic syndromes (refractory anemia). A perspective of the biologic, clinical, and therapeutic issues. Med Clin North Am. May 1992;76(3):599-617. [Medline].

  2. Goldberg H, Lusk E, Moore J, Nowell PC, Besa EC. Survey of exposure to genotoxic agents in primary myelodysplastic syndrome: correlation with chromosome patterns and data on patients without hematological disease. Cancer Res. Nov 1 1990;50(21):6876-81. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. Kristinsson SY, Bjorkholm M, Hultcrantz M, et al. Chronic immune stimulation might act as a trigger for the development of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2011;29(21):2897-903. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Ma X, Does M, Raza A, Mayne ST. Myelodysplastic syndromes: incidence and survival in the United States. Cancer. Apr 15 2007;109(8):1536-42. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  5. Rollison DE, Hayat M, Smith M, et al. First report of national estimates of the incidence of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders from the U.S. SEER program [abstract 247]. Blood. 2006;108:77a. [Full Text].

  6. Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, et al. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs. Blood. Jul 1 2008;112(1):45-52. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med. Oct 1985;103(4):620-5. [Medline].

  8. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, et al. World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1999;17(12):3835-49. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  9. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. Jul 30 2009;114(5):937-51. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  10. General Information About Myelodysplastic Syndromes. National Cancer Institute. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/myelodysplastic/HealthProfessional/page1#Reference1.9.

  11. Molldrem JJ, Leifer E, Bahceci E, et al. Antithymocyte globulin for treatment of the bone marrow failure associated with myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. Aug 6 2002;137(3):156-63. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. Mar 15 1997;89(6):2079-88. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  13. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. May 15 2002;20(10):2429-40. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  14. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. Feb 10 2005;352(6):549-57. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  15. Musto P, Lanza F, Balleari E, et al. Darbepoetin alpha for the treatment of anaemia in low-intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. Jan 2005;128(2):204-9. [Medline].

  16. Jädersten M, Montgomery SM, Dybedal I, Porwit-MacDonald A, Hellström-Lindberg E. Long-term outcome of treatment of anemia in MDS with erythropoietin and G-CSF. Blood. Aug 1 2005;106(3):803-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  17. [Best Evidence] Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, et al. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study. Lancet Oncol. Mar 2009;10(3):223-32. [Medline].

  18. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, Pinto A, Schiffer CA, Nimer SD, et al. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. Dec 1 2000;96(12):3671-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

Previous
Next
 
Blood film (1000× magnification) demonstrating a vacuolated blast in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.
This bone marrow film (400× magnification) demonstrates an almost complete replacement of normal hematopoiesis by blasts in a refractory anemia with an excess of blasts in transformation. Note the signs of abnormal maturation such as vacuolation, double nucleus, and macrocytosis. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Bone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstrating ring sideroblasts in Prussian blue staining in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Bone marrow film (1000× magnification) demonstrating granular and clotlike positive reaction in periodic acid-Schiff staining in a refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation. Courtesy of U. Woermann, MD, Division of Instructional Media, Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Table 1. International Prognostic Scoring System Risk Groups and Prognosis[10]
Risk GroupTime to Development of AML (y)Median Survival (y)
Low risk9.45.7
Intermediate risk – 13.33.5
Intermediate risk – 21.11.2
High risk0.20.4
AML – Acute myelogenous leukemia
Table 2. IPSS Score for Staging MDS[12]
Prognostic Variable0 Points0.5 Points1 Point1.5 Points2 Points
Bone marrow blasts, %< 55-1011-2021-30
Karyotype*GoodIntermediatePoor
Cytopenias0/12/3
*Good is no abnormality (46,XX or 46,XY), -Y, del(5q), del(20q); intermediate is other abnormalities, such as trisomy 8 (+8); and poor is complex (33 abnormalities or chromosome 7 abnormality [ie, 7q- or -7]).
Table 3. Categories of FAB Classification Versus WHO Classification for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
FAB



Classification



WHO-2004



Classification



WHO-2008



Classification



RARA RCMD 5q-RCUD RCMD 5q-
RARSRARS RCMD-RSRARS RCMD-RS RARS-T
RAEBRAEB-1 RAEB-2RAEB-1 RAEB-2
CMMLCMML-1 CMML-2CMML-1 CMML-2
RAEB-TAMLAML
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.