Immunoglobulin-Related Amyloidosis
- Author: Slavomir Urbancek, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: Emmanuel C Besa, MD more...
Background
Immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis is a monoclonal plasma cell disorder in which the secreted monoclonal immunoglobulin protein forms insoluble fibrillar deposits in 1 or more organs. In nearly all cases, the deposits contain immunoglobulin light (L) chains or L-chain fragments, termed L chain–type amyloidosis (AL). In a few reported patients, the amyloid deposits have contained immunoglobulin heavy (H) chains; these are termed H chain–type amyloidosis AH). Before the discovery that the major fibril component in these patients was an immunoglobulin fragment, patients with light chain–type amyloidosis were described as having primary (in the sense of idiopathic) amyloidosis or, when the burden of monoclonal plasma cells was large, myeloma-associated amyloidosis.
Immunoglobulin L and H chains are 2 of 20 different fibril proteins that have been described in human amyloidosis. For a general discussion of the human amyloidoses, the types of human amyloidosis, and an approach to the diagnosis of amyloidosis, see Amyloidosis, Overview.
L chain–type amyloidosis (AL) is related to both multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). These monoclonal plasma cell disorders can be categorized according to the total body burden of monoclonal plasma cells. When this burden is large, the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma are fulfilled; when this burden is lower, MGUS is diagnosed. Multiple myeloma and MGUS fall on a continuum, with 20% of patients with MGUS progressing to multiple myeloma within 10 years.
In most patients with a monoclonal plasma cell disorder, whether multiple myeloma or MGUS, the monoclonal L chain secreted by the clone remains soluble in the bloodstream. However, in some patients, the physicochemical characteristics of the immunoglobulin L chain or L-chain fragment lead to its deposition as amyloid. Thus, some patients with light chain–type amyloidosis meet the diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma, whereas other patients can be considered as having MGUS in which the clonal immunoglobulin product is amyloidogenic.
In addition to cases of monoclonal gammopathy in which the secreted clonal immunoglobulin remains in solution and those in which secreted clonal immunoglobulin forms amyloid deposits, a third group consists of cases in which the monoclonal proteins accumulate in various organs, but the deposits do not form fibrils. Patients with this form are described as having nonamyloid monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD). The relationship among the plasma cell dyscrasias and the amyloidoses is depicted in the image below.
The relationship among light chain–type amyloidosis (AL), the other monoclonal plasma cell disorders, and the other amyloidoses. Ig = immunoglobulin; MGUS = monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Pathophysiology
The most common light chain–type amyloidosis precursor proteins are L chains of the lambda (l) class. The lambda light chain–type amyloidosis is approximately twice as prevalent as the kappa (k) light chain–type amyloidosis, and L chains of the Vl 6 class are the most amyloidogenic. Clonal plasma cell proliferative diseases in which the Vl 6 gene is expressed are always associated with amyloid deposition. Among Vk genes, the Vk 1 subgroup is overrepresented among amyloid-forming L chains.
Within the V region families, certain amino acid residues occurring at particular positions in the L-chain sequence render those chains are more amyloidogenic, with a combination of such residues increasing the chances of a particular L-chain protein being associated with tissue amyloid deposition. Another structural feature that appears to predispose to L chain – type amyloid deposition is enzymatic glycosylation of the L chain. Although 15% of human L chains bear sugar residues, almost one third of amyloidogenic L chains are glycosylated. Why certain amino acid and glycosylation characteristics in L chains predispose to amyloid formation remains unknown.
L chain – type amyloid deposits contain intact L chains, L-chain fragments, or both (most patients). The fragments always include the amino terminus of the chain and range in mass from 5000 to 16,000 d. In 90% of patients, the deposited peptides include at least some constant region sequence; therefore, the peptides react with commercially available anti–L chain sera, which are specific for constant region determinants. These observations explain why 10% of deposits do not bind either commercial anti-k or anti-l antisera.
L chain – type amyloid deposits can develop in any organ system. The most common organs involved are the kidneys, the heart, the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the peripheral nerves, and the liver. In most cases, the deposits affect multiple organ systems. Factors leading to the specific pattern of organ involvement in a particular patient are not understood.
In a minority of cases, localized amyloid deposits, including amyloid masses (amyloidomas), may be found in various sites, even in the absence of systemic disease. The pathogenesis of localized light chain–type amyloidosis is not well understood, but a small, localized clone of plasma cells apparently produces immunoglobulin, which forms deposits near the site of synthesis. In some patients, plasma cells have been demonstrated histologically, accompanying the localized amyloid deposits. In one patient, DNA sequencing revealed that local plasma cells were producing the locally deposited L chains.
Researchers from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) studied the gene profile of more than 500 patients treated for multiple myeloma at UAMS.[1] Of the about 25,000 genes in the body, the UAMS team found the expression of just 17 genes revealed which form of the disease the patients had.[1] A gene is expressed when its DNA is transcribed into RNA, which is later transcribed into protein. The expression level of those 17 genes becomes an overpowering and overriding predictor of outcome in therapy. It is questionable whether a drug that targets those genes will be developed.
Epidemiology
Frequency
United States
Annually, 1-5 cases of immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis per 100,000 people occur.
The best available direct data on L chain–type amyloidosis prevalence in the United States come from Olmstead County, Minn, where the annual prevalence of L chain–type amyloidosis was calculated to be approximately 1 case per 100,000 people. The population in this location is primarily of northern European ancestry. Whether this prevalence applies to different populations is not known.
Based on indirect calculations, the prevalence may be higher. The annual incidence of multiple myeloma is approximately 5 cases per 100,000 people, and the prevalence of L chain–type amyloidosis in patients with myeloma is approximately 20-35%, producing an overall incidence of combined L chain–type amyloidosis and myeloma of 1-1.5 cases per 100,000 people. Only 1 in 5 patients with L chain–type amyloidosis has frank myeloma; therefore, the total number of patients with L chain–type amyloidosis type is 5 times the number of patients with L chain–type amyloidosis and myeloma, or at least 5 cases per 100,000 people.
International
The prevalence of L chain–type amyloidosis appears to be the same in all populations. The only population-based direct measurement comes from the United States.
Mortality/Morbidity
Symptoms of immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis reflect the organs containing amyloid deposits. Factors that cause deposits in different organs in different patients are unknown. Cardiac deposition is the most severe consequence of systemic L chain–type amyloidosis, eventually occurring in most patients. Cardiac L chain–type amyloidosis is the cause of death in most patients with systemic L chain–type amyloidosis.
Race
L chain–type amyloidosis affects people of all racial and ethnic groups. No data are available comparing the incidence of disease in different groups.
Sex
The male-to-female incidence ratio of L chain–type amyloidosis is 2:1.
Age
The median age at diagnosis of immunoglobulin-related amyloidosis in the largest published series (from the Mayo Clinic) was 64 years.[2]
UAMS researchers ID 17 genes that lead to high-risk myeloma. Updated: April 9, 2007. Fox16.com. Available at http://www.fox16.com/news/local/story/UAMS-researchers-ID-17-genes-that-lead-to-high/km2T2OFQGEKoCaRCIcjv3Q.cspx. Accessed February 11, 2009.
Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases. Semin Hematol. Jan 1995;32(1):45-59. [Medline].
Leibovitch I, Selva D, Goldberg RA, et al. Periocular and orbital amyloidosis: clinical characteristics, management, and outcome. Ophthalmology. Sep 2006;113(9):1657-64. [Medline].
Cross TJ, Wendon JA, Quaglia A, et al. Myeloma associated amyloidosis presenting as subacute liver failure. Postgrad Med J. Jul 2006;82(969):e13. [Medline].
Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, et al. Serum immunoglobulin free light-chain measurement in primary amyloidosis: prognostic value and correlations with clinical features. Blood. Dec 9 2010;116(24):5126-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Katzmann JA, et al. Absolute values of immunoglobulin free light chains are prognostic in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. Apr 15 2006;107(8):3378-83. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Porrata LF, Gertz MA, Litzow MR, et al. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with primary systemic amyloidosis. Clin Cancer Res. Feb 1 2005;11(3):1210-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Paiva B, Vídriales MB, Pérez JJ, López-Berges MC, García-Sanz R, Ocio EM, et al. The clinical utility and prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotyping in light-chain amyloidosis. Blood. Mar 31 2011;117(13):3613-6. [Medline].
Wall JS, Kennel SJ, Stuckey AC, Long MJ, Townsend DW, Smith GT. Radioimmunodetection of amyloid deposits in patients with AL amyloidosis. Blood. Sep 30 2010;116(13):2241-4. [Medline].
Pan WH, Li NP. Clinical pathological feature of early tongue amyloidosis. Chin Med Sci J. Jun 2006;21(2):104-6. [Medline].
Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Greipp PR, et al. A trial of three regimens for primary amyloidosis: colchicine alone, melphalan and prednisone, and melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine. N Engl J Med. Apr 24 1997;336(17):1202-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Skinner M, Anderson J, Simms R, et al. Treatment of 100 patients with primary amyloidosis: a randomized trial of melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine versus colchicine only. Am J Med. Mar 1996;100(3):290-8. [Medline].
Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Lust JA, et al. Prospective randomized trial of melphalan and prednisone versus vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1999;17(1):262-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Anderson K, Richardson P, Chanan-Khan A, et al. Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM): results of a phase II multicenter study [abstract 7504]. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:423s.
Dispenzieri A, Zhang L, Fonseca R, et al. Single agent bortezomib is associated with a high response rate in patients with high risk myeloma. A phase II study from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02) [abstract 3527]. Blood. 2006;108(11):1006s. [Full Text].
Harousseau JL, Attal M, Leleu X, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of an IFM phase II study. Haematologica. Nov 2006;91(11):1498-505. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Lee AI, Munshi NC. Integration of novel agents into treatment of myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. Aug 2007;7(suppl 5):S215-21. [Medline].
Jagannath S, Durie BG, Wolf J, et al. Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. Jun 2005;129(6):776-83. [Medline].
Oakervee HE, Popat R, Curry N, et al. PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. Jun 2005;129(6):755-62. [Medline].
Popat R, Oakervee HE, Curry N, et al. Reduced dose PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma [abstract 2554]. Blood. 2005;106:171a-718a. [Full Text].
Jakubowiak AJ, Al-Zoubi A, Kendall T, et al. High rate of complete and near complete responses (CR/nCR) after initial therapy with bortezomib (Velcade®), Doxil®, and dexamethasone (VDD) is further increased after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) [abstract 3093]. Blood. 2006;108:882a. [Full Text].
Tran Thang NN, Abdo G, Martin JB, et al. Percutaneous cementoplasty in multiple myeloma: a valuable adjunct for pain control and ambulation maintenance. Support Care Cancer. Aug 2008;16(8):891-6. [Medline].
Gianni L, Bellotti V, Gianni AM, Merlini G. New drug therapy of amyloidoses: resorption of AL-type deposits with 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin. Blood. Aug 1 1995;86(3):855-61. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Biehn SE, Moore DT, Voorhees PM, et al. Extended follow-up of outcome measures in multiple myeloma patients treated on a phase I study with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Ann Hematol. Mar 2007;86(3):211-6. [Medline].
Browning MJ, Banks RA, Tribe CR, et al. Ten years' experience of an amyloid clinic--a clinicopathological survey. Q J Med. Mar 1985;54(215):213-27. [Medline].
Buxbaum J, Gallo G. Nonamyloidotic monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease. Light-chain, heavy-chain, and light- and heavy-chain deposition diseases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. Dec 1999;13(6):1235-48. [Medline].
Camoriano JK, Greipp PR, Bayer GK, Bowie EJ. Resolution of acquired factor X deficiency and amyloidosis with melphalan and prednisone therapy. N Engl J Med. Apr 30 1987;316(18):1133-5. [Medline].
Davern S, Tang LX, Williams TK, et al. Immunodiagnostic capabilities of anti-free immunoglobulin light chain monoclonal antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol. Nov 2008;130(5):702-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia. Nov 20 2008;epub ahead of print. [Medline].
Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Response rates and survival in primary systemic amyloidosis. Blood. Jan 15 1991;77(2):257-62. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Harousseau JL. The allogeneic dilemma. Bone Marrow Transplant. Dec 2007;40(12):1123-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Jagannath S, Durie BGM, Wolf JL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone as frontline therapy for multiple myeloma [abstract 796]. Blood. Nov 2006;108:238a. [Full Text].
Kyle RA. High-dose therapy in multiple myeloma and primary amyloidosis: an overview. Semin Oncol. Feb 1999;26(1):74-83. [Medline].
Pelosi F Jr, Capehart J, Roberts WC. Effectiveness of cardiac transplantation for primary (AL) cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. Feb 15 1997;79(4):532-5. [Medline].
Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. Jun 26 2003;348(26):2609-17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Rubinow A, Skinner M, Cohen AS. Digoxin sensitivity in amyloid cardiomyopathy. Circulation. Jun 1981;63(6):1285-8. [Medline].
Simons M, Isner JM. Assessment of relative sensitivities of noninvasive tests for cardiac amyloidosis in documented cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. Feb 1 1992;69(4):425-7. [Medline].
Solomon A, Weiss DT, Murphy C. Primary amyloidosis associated with a novel heavy-chain fragment (AH amyloidosis). Am J Hematol. Feb 1994;45(2):171-6. [Medline].
van Gameren II, Hazenberg BP, Bijzet J, van Rijswijk MH. Diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue aspiration for detecting systemic amyloidosis and its utility in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum. Jun 2006;54(6):2015-21. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Yood RA, Skinner M, Rubinow A, Talarico L, Cohen AS. Bleeding manifestations in 100 patients with amyloidosis. JAMA. Mar 11 1983;249(10):1322-4. [Medline].
| Trial | N | ORR % | CR/Near CR % | Very good PR % |
| Bortezomib Monotherapy Jagannath et al[18] Anderson et al[14] Dispenzieri et al[15] | 49 63 42 | 49 40 52 | 10 10 0 | 2 NR 5 |
| Bortezomib/Dexamethasone Jagannath et al[18] Harousseau et al[16] | 49 48 | 88 67 | 18 21 | 20 10 |
| Bortezomib/ Doxorubicin/ Dexamethasone Oakervee et al (standard dose)[19] Popat et al (reduced dose)[20] | 21 19 | 95 89 | 29 16 | 33 26 |
| Bortezomib/PLD/Dexamethasone Jakubowiak et al[21] | 28 | 89 | 32 | 21 |

