Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Immunoglobulin-Related Amyloidosis Workup

  • Author: Slavomir Urbancek, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: Emmanuel C Besa, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jan 29, 2015
 

Laboratory Studies

Once the diagnosis of L chain–type amyloidosis has been established (see Biopsy), the clinician should perform laboratory studies to observe for abnormalities that are commonly found in L chain–type amyloidosis (eg, impairment in renal function or coagulation) and to evaluate for possible multiple myeloma.

Tests for monoclonal immunoglobulin

Monoclonal immunoglobulin L chain, the cardinal laboratory finding in L chain–type amyloidosis, is detected on electrophoresis or immunoelectrophoresisi n the serum or the urine of 80-90% of patients. This percentage reflects the limit to the sensitivity of routine laboratory testing rather than the biology of L chain–type amyloidosis. Because plasma cells in bone marrow (or occasionally in other sites) synthesize immunoglobulin L chains, which are deposited in various organs, the L chains must travel through the bloodstream. Thus, in theory, if a sufficiently sensitive assay were used, monoclonal serum L chains or L-chain fragments would be detected in all patients.

Overall survival is related to the free monoclonal light-chain concentration in the serum, independent of other risk factors, with higher concentrations associated with shorter survival.[5]

The concentration of normal immunoglobulin is often decreased, such as in multiple myeloma. The combination of hypogammaglobulinemia and proteinuria should suggest a diagnosis of L chain–type amyloidosis or monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD). In contrast, renal amyloid of the amyloid A type is usually associated with hypergammaglobulinemia related to persistent inflammation and interleukin-6 (IL-6) production.

A study by Dispenzieri et al showed that the absolute value of immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) as a precursor protein of amyloid is prognostic in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).[6] There was a significantly higher risk of death in patients with higher baseline free light chains, and normalization of the free light chain level after PBSCT predicted for both organ response and complete hematologic response.

Blood counts

The complete blood cell count (CBC) is usually unremarkable. Functional asplenism may occur, leading to mild thrombocytosis and Howell-Jolly bodies in the peripheral blood.

Absolute lymphocyte count recovery at day 15 (ALC-15) after autologous stem cell transplantation seems to be a powerful prognostic indicator for overall survival and progression-free survival.[7] An ALC-15 of 500 or greater is associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes.

Coagulation studies

Many clotting system abnormalities have been described in L chain–type amyloidosis. Occasionally, coagulopathy and prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) arise because of the binding of a clotting factor (most often factor X) to the amyloid deposits.

Acquired factor X deficiency is difficult to correct because infused factor X is cleared quickly from the circulation. Elevation in tissue and urine plasminogen activators and a decrease in tissue plasminogen activator inhibitor, leading to hyperfibrinolytic states, have also been reported.

Urinary protein

When L chain–type amyloidosis involves the kidneys, proteinuria is invariably present. One third to one half of patients excrete at least 1 gram of protein per day in the urine, predominantly albumin.

The 24-hour urinary protein level can be monitored serially to evaluate the response to chemotherapy. Improvement in response to treatment may be associated with a decrease in protein excretion.

Liver and renal function studies

Liver function abnormalities are rare, even in cases with massive deposition. Rarely, extensive liver involvement can lead to decreased levels of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors.

On renal function studies, severe azotemia is a late manifestation of renal L chain–type amyloidosis and is less common than proteinuria. However, mild elevation of the serum creatinine level (at least 2 mg/dL) is often present.

Bone marrow examination

Approximately 40% of patients have more than 10% plasma cells in the bone marrow. L-chain immunophenotyping of the marrow, even in the absence of increased numbers of plasma cells, usually exhibits the distortion in the k:l ratio, reflecting the L-chain type of the amyloid precursor.

Paiva et al reported that the use of multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotyping to demonstrate plasma cell clonality in patients with amyloid-positive tissue staining could help in the differentiation of light chain amyloidosis from other forms of amyloidosis, and that the quantitative distribution of monoclonal and normal plasma cell populations may be useful in establishing the prognosis of individual patients with respect to overall survival.[8] However, the report did not specifically evaluate responses to therapy in general or any specific treatment. This kind of prognostic information requires a much larger patient cohort.

Next

Imaging Studies

Cardiac imaging

Cardiac deposition is the most serious complication of L chain–type amyloidosis. Cardiac involvement should be assessed and monitored by means of imaging studies. No noninvasive test is sufficiently sensitive or specific to definitively diagnose cardiac amyloidosis, although two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) and electrocardiography (ECG), particularly when combined, can strongly suggest cardiac amyloidosis. Other cardiac imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT) scanning and nuclear scintigraphy, are of less value than ECG and echocardiography.

Echocardiography

The most useful noninvasive diagnostic test for cardiac amyloidosis is echocardiography, which enables the visualization of increased ventricular wall thickness, increased septal thickness, and an appearance of granular "sparkling." This finding is neither sensitive nor specific enough to be diagnostic, but it is highly suggestive when present.

L chain–type amyloid deposits in the heart occur in the ventricular interstitium, leading to thickening of the ventricular walls and intraventricular septum without an increase in intracardiac volume. Evaluation of diastolic function with Doppler echocardiography reveals impaired ventricular relaxation early in the course of disease, which progresses to short deceleration. The ejection fraction is preserved until late in the disease course.

Other echocardiographic findings include valvular thickening and insufficiency and atrial enlargement. Atrial thrombosis has also been described. Combining ECG and echocardiography appears to provide the most diagnostic value.

Bone imaging

As in any patient with a plasma cell dyscrasia, patients with L chain–type amyloidosis should have a skeletal survey that includes the skull, the entire spine, and the pelvis. Any bony pain that develops can result from plasma cell infiltration; therefore, obtain radiographs of any area where pain develops.

Chest radiography

Systemic L chain–type amyloidosis may deposit in any part of the respiratory tree, from the nasopharynx to the pulmonary alveoli. Involvement is often asymptomatic, although alveolar or diffuse interstitial involvement can cause dyspnea. Chest radiographs reveal a reticular nodular pattern or interstitial infiltration.

Nuclear medicine

Scintigraphy with radioiodine-labeled serum amyloid pentagonal component (SAP) is used in Europe for evaluating the total body burden of amyloid and is a sensitive, noninvasive means of diagnosing amyloid deposits in most organs. Serial studies are useful for monitoring response to therapy. The technique is not useful for diagnosing or monitoring cardiac amyloid, because the concentration of the radiolabeled agent in the intracardiac blood pool obscures the weaker signal from the labeled molecule bound to myocardial amyloid. However, SAP scintigraphy is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration because the SAP is isolated from human sources.[9]

Amyloid imaging agents that would not involve human materials include a synthetic heparin-binding peptide, p5, radiolabeled with technetium 99m (99m Tc-p5). A study by Wall et al that compared radioiodine-labeled SAP with99m Tc-p5 concluded that99m Tc-p5 is an effective amyloid-imaging radiotracer in the murine model of amyloidosis, and may be rapidly translated for imaging patients with visceral amyloidosis.[10]

In an earlier phase I study, Wall and colleagues used a radiolabeled monoclonal amyloid antibody to visualize amyloid deposits in patients with AL amyloidosis. Nine of the 18 subjects showed striking uptake of reagent in liver, lymph nodes, bone marrow, intestine, and spleen (but not kidney or heart). These authors concluded that this method could be used to identify candidates for passive immunotherapy using the chimeric form of the antibody, which has been shown to produce marked regression of human light-chain–associated tumors in mice.[11]

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Obtaining a biopsy sample of an affected organ followed by routine hematoxylin and eosin staining reveals homogeneous, interstitial, eosinophilic material. Amyloid material stained with Congo red and viewed under polarized light appears bright green. Specific staining with antibodies against kappa and lambda L chains proves the diagnosis of L chain–type amyloidosis (as opposed to other types of amyloidosis, which have a similar appearance after hematoxylin and eosin or Congo red staining) (see Amyloidosis).

In monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD), the immunoglobulin deposits do not bind Congo red stain, they do not contain P component or other components of amyloid fibrils, and (unlike in amyloidosis) they are not fibrillar. MIDD occurs most frequently in the kidneys and the heart. Nodular glomerulosclerosis observed on routine histologic examination in the absence of diabetes mellitus suggests MIDD. The pathologic diagnosis of nonamyloid MIDD depends on the identification of immunoglobulin deposits in tissues via immunostaining. MIDD may be underdiagnosed because immunostaining is not routinely performed.

The clinical pathologic feature and diagnostic criteria of tongue amyloidosis is important. Twenty-five patients were pathologically diagnosed as having tongue amyloidosis, although none had an enlarged tongue.[12] Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining were employed to detect the amyloid deposition on the tongue, with amyloid depositions in the basement membrane, muscle cell, vessel wall, and nerve fiber.

Immunohistochemical study demonstrated kappa light-chain deposition in 64% of cases, and lambda light-chain deposition in 36% of them.[12] Thus, biopsy is an important means for the diagnosis of early tongue L chain–type amyloidosis, and the wide variety of amyloid light chains is helpful in the differential diagnosis (see Differential Diagnoses).

Previous
Next

Electrocardiography

The classic ECG finding in patients with cardiac amyloidosis is a low-voltage QRS complex in the limb leads, resulting from replacement of normal cardiac tissue by nonconducting amyloid material. In some cases, loss of anterior forces suggests anteroseptal infarction that is not confirmed at autopsy. A variety of arrhythmias are observed and can be life threatening.

Previous
Next

Biopsy

Amyloidosis of all types is definitively diagnosed by a positive Congo red stain of a biopsy specimen. For many years, a biopsy of the rectum was the procedure of choice. However, it is known that capillaries in subcutaneous fat are frequently involved. These capillaries can provide sufficient tissue for the diagnosis of amyloidosis, and further analysis with immunostaining and, in some cases, amino acid sequence analysis.

Currently, aspiration of subcutaneous abdominal fat is a simple and fast method for obtaining a specimen to detect systemic amyloidosis, with a routine sensitivity of 80%. If analysis of aspirated fat tissue yields negative results, the additional value of a subsequent biopsy of the rectum is negligible.

Thus, obtaining a biopsy from the organ with the most severe clinical involvement is not always necessary. However, a biopsy from an organ with impaired function, such as a kidney or the heart, definitively establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between the organ dysfunction and the amyloid deposition.

L chain – type amyloid deposition in the peripheral nerves leads to axonal degeneration of the small nerve fibers, which leads to polyneuropathy. The diagnosis can often be made through findings from a biopsy of the sural nerve, although the deposits may be proximal to the sural nerve and, therefore, not found in the biopsy sample.

Obtaining a renal biopsy sample is rarely necessary, but findings exhibit deposits in the glomerular mesangium and, later, along the basement membrane.

Other potential biopsy sites include the salivary glands, the stomach, and the bone marrow.

Avoid obtaining a percutaneous liver biopsy. Such biopsies are contraindicated in the presence of coagulopathy. Severe and even fatal bleeding has occurred in this setting.

Immunostaining

After Congo red staining is used to establish a diagnosis of amyloidosis, the specific type of amyloidosis is determined by immunostaining a biopsy specimen using commercially available, specific antisera against k and l chains.

Do not assume that the amyloid is of the L-chain type based on indirect tests, such as serum or urine protein electrophoresis or immunofixation, because monoclonal proteins are common in the elderly population and may be present as incidental findings in patients with other types of amyloidosis.

Distinguishing between L chain–type amyloidosis and TTR cardiac amyloidosis on clinical grounds alone is particularly difficult. Without immunologic identification of the deposited protein, an incorrect presumptive diagnosis of L chain–type amyloidosis could lead to ineffective and perhaps harmful treatment.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Slavomir Urbancek, MD, PhD Head, Department of Dermatology, FD Roosevelt Hospital, Slovakia; Member of executive commitee - Slovak Dermatovenereological Society

Slavomir Urbancek, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Dermatology, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Slovakian Dermatovenerological Society, Slovak Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology

Disclosure: Received honoraria from Abbott for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Pfizer for none; Received honoraria from Janssen for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from MSD for speaking and teaching; Received consulting fee from Roche for speaking and teaching.

Coauthor(s)

Daniel R Jacobson, MD Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine; Chief of Oncology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH Professor and Head of Dermatology, Professor of Pathology, Pediatrics, Medicine, and Preventive Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School; Visiting Professor, Rutgers University School of Public Affairs and Administration

Robert A Schwartz, MD, MPH is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, New York Academy of Medicine, American Academy of Dermatology, American College of Physicians, Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Carol A Bogdan, MD Consultant in Hematology-Oncology, Myrtle Beach, SC

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Joel N Buxbaum, MD Professor, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute

Joel N Buxbaum, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Society for Clinical Investigation, American Society of Human Genetics, Association of American Physicians, Association of Black Cardiologists, Henry Kunkel Society

Disclosure: Received consulting fee from Foldrx pharmaceuticals for consulting; Received consulting fee from Isis pharmaceuticals for consulting; Received consulting fee from alnylam pharmaceutical for consulting; Received consulting fee from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals for consulting.

Pere Gascon, MD, PhD Professor and Director, Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Hematology and Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona Faculty of Medicine, Spain

Pere Gascon, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, New York Academy of Medicine, New York Academy of Sciences, Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Lawrence H Brent, MD Associate Professor of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University; Chair, Program Director, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein Medical Center

Lawrence H Brent, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association of Immunologists, American College of Physicians, American College of Rheumatology

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Janssen<br/>Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Abbvie; Genentech; Pfizer; Questcor.

Chief Editor

Emmanuel C Besa, MD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University

Emmanuel C Besa, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Education, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American College of Clinical Pharmacology, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Hematology, New York Academy of Sciences

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Robert E Wolf, MD, PhD Professor Emeritus, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University School of Medicine in Shreveport; Chief, Rheumatology Section, Medical Service, Overton Brooks Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Robert E Wolf, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Rheumatology, Arthritis Foundation, Society for Leukocyte Biology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Shaughnessy JD Jr, Zhan F, Burington BE, Huang Y, Colla S, Hanamura I, et al. A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood. 2007 Mar 15. 109(6):2276-84. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  2. Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Primary systemic amyloidosis: clinical and laboratory features in 474 cases. Semin Hematol. 1995 Jan. 32(1):45-59. [Medline].

  3. Leibovitch I, Selva D, Goldberg RA, et al. Periocular and orbital amyloidosis: clinical characteristics, management, and outcome. Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep. 113(9):1657-64. [Medline].

  4. Cross TJ, Wendon JA, Quaglia A, et al. Myeloma associated amyloidosis presenting as subacute liver failure. Postgrad Med J. 2006 Jul. 82(969):e13. [Medline].

  5. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, et al. Serum immunoglobulin free light-chain measurement in primary amyloidosis: prognostic value and correlations with clinical features. Blood. 2010 Dec 9. 116(24):5126-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  6. Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Katzmann JA, et al. Absolute values of immunoglobulin free light chains are prognostic in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2006 Apr 15. 107(8):3378-83. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  7. Porrata LF, Gertz MA, Litzow MR, et al. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with primary systemic amyloidosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Feb 1. 11(3):1210-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Paiva B, Vídriales MB, Pérez JJ, López-Berges MC, García-Sanz R, Ocio EM, et al. The clinical utility and prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry immunophenotyping in light-chain amyloidosis. Blood. 2011 Mar 31. 117(13):3613-6. [Medline].

  9. Chopra A. 125I-Labeled single-chain monoclonal antibody, NS4F5, that targets the GlcNS6S-IdoA2S motif of heparan sulfate proteoglycans for the in vivo imaging of peripheral amyloidosis. 2004. [Medline].

  10. Wall JS, Richey T, Williams A, Stuckey A, Osborne D, Martin E, et al. Comparative analysis of peptide p5 and serum amyloid P component for imaging AA amyloid in mice using dual-isotope SPECT. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012 Aug. 14(4):402-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Wall JS, Kennel SJ, Stuckey AC, Long MJ, Townsend DW, Smith GT. Radioimmunodetection of amyloid deposits in patients with AL amyloidosis. Blood. 2010 Sep 30. 116(13):2241-4. [Medline].

  12. Pan WH, Li NP. Clinical pathological feature of early tongue amyloidosis. Chin Med Sci J. 2006 Jun. 21(2):104-6. [Medline].

  13. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Greipp PR, et al. A trial of three regimens for primary amyloidosis: colchicine alone, melphalan and prednisone, and melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine. N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 24. 336(17):1202-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  14. Skinner M, Anderson J, Simms R, et al. Treatment of 100 patients with primary amyloidosis: a randomized trial of melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine versus colchicine only. Am J Med. 1996 Mar. 100(3):290-8. [Medline].

  15. Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Lust JA, et al. Prospective randomized trial of melphalan and prednisone versus vincristine, carmustine, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone in the treatment of primary systemic amyloidosis. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan. 17(1):262-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. Anderson K, Richardson P, Chanan-Khan A, et al. Single-agent bortezomib in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM): results of a phase II multicenter study [abstract 7504]. J Clin Oncol. 2006. 24:423s.

  17. Dispenzieri A, Zhang L, Fonseca R, et al. Single agent bortezomib is associated with a high response rate in patients with high risk myeloma. A phase II study from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E2A02) [abstract 3527]. Blood. 2006. 108(11):1006s. [Full Text].

  18. Mateos MV, Richardson PG, Schlag R, Khuageva NK, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone compared with melphalan and prednisone in previously untreated multiple myeloma: updated follow-up and impact of subsequent therapy in the phase III VISTA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1. 28(13):2259-66. [Medline].

  19. Harousseau JL, Palumbo A, Richardson PG, Schlag R, Dimopoulos MA, Shpilberg O, et al. Superior outcomes associated with complete response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with nonintensive therapy: analysis of the phase 3 VISTA study of bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone versus melphalan-prednisone. Blood. 2010 Nov 11. 116(19):3743-50. [Medline].

  20. Harousseau JL, Attal M, Leleu X, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of an IFM phase II study. Haematologica. 2006 Nov. 91(11):1498-505. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  21. San Miguel J, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, et al. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct. 14(11):1055-66. [Medline].

  22. Gianni L, Bellotti V, Gianni AM, Merlini G. New drug therapy of amyloidoses: resorption of AL-type deposits with 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin. Blood. 1995 Aug 1. 86(3):855-61. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  23. Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Cheson BD, Barlogie B, Kyle RA, et al. A multicenter phase II trial of 4'-iodo-4'deoxydoxorubicin (IDOX) in primary amyloidosis (AL). Amyloid. 2002 Mar. 9(1):24-30. [Medline].

  24. Tran Thang NN, Abdo G, Martin JB, et al. Percutaneous cementoplasty in multiple myeloma: a valuable adjunct for pain control and ambulation maintenance. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Aug. 16(8):891-6. [Medline].

  25. Apridonidze T, Steingart RM, Comenzo RL, Hoffman J, Goldsmith Y, Bella JN, et al. Clinical and Echocardiographic Correlates of Elevated Troponin in Amyloid Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 5. [Medline].

  26. Nelson LM, Gustafsson F, Gimsing P. Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Systemic Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis. Acta Haematol. 2014 Dec 16. 133(4):336-346. [Medline].

  27. Warsame R, Bang SM, Kumar SK, Gertz MA, Lacy MQ, Buadi F, et al. Outcomes and treatments of patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis who progress or relapse postautologous stem cell transplant. Eur J Haematol. 2014 Jun. 92(6):485-90. [Medline].

  28. Biehn SE, Moore DT, Voorhees PM, et al. Extended follow-up of outcome measures in multiple myeloma patients treated on a phase I study with bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. Ann Hematol. 2007 Mar. 86(3):211-6. [Medline].

  29. Browning MJ, Banks RA, Tribe CR, et al. Ten years' experience of an amyloid clinic--a clinicopathological survey. Q J Med. 1985 Mar. 54(215):213-27. [Medline].

  30. Buxbaum J, Gallo G. Nonamyloidotic monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease. Light-chain, heavy-chain, and light- and heavy-chain deposition diseases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999 Dec. 13(6):1235-48. [Medline].

  31. Camoriano JK, Greipp PR, Bayer GK, Bowie EJ. Resolution of acquired factor X deficiency and amyloidosis with melphalan and prednisone therapy. N Engl J Med. 1987 Apr 30. 316(18):1133-5. [Medline].

  32. Davern S, Tang LX, Williams TK, et al. Immunodiagnostic capabilities of anti-free immunoglobulin light chain monoclonal antibodies. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Nov. 130(5):702-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  33. [Guideline] Dimopoulos MA., Weise K, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, et al. Final Analysis, Cytogenetics, Long-Term Treatment, and Long-Term Survival In MM-003, A Phase 3 Study Comparing Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDEX) Vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDEX) In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). www.myelomabeacon.com. Available at http://www.myelomabeacon.com/resources/mtgs/ash2013/abs/408/. Accessed: May, 18, 2014.

  34. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia. 2008 Nov 20. epub ahead of print. [Medline].

  35. Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Response rates and survival in primary systemic amyloidosis. Blood. 1991 Jan 15. 77(2):257-62. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  36. Harousseau JL. The allogeneic dilemma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Dec. 40(12):1123-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  37. Jagannath S, Durie BG, Wolf J, et al. Bortezomib therapy alone and in combination with dexamethasone for previously untreated symptomatic multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun. 129(6):776-83. [Medline].

  38. Jagannath S, Durie BGM, Wolf JL, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients treated with bortezomib alone and in combination with dexamethasone as frontline therapy for multiple myeloma [abstract 796]. Blood. Nov 2006. 108:238a. [Full Text].

  39. Jakubowiak AJ, Al-Zoubi A, Kendall T, et al. High rate of complete and near complete responses (CR/nCR) after initial therapy with bortezomib (Velcade®), Doxil®, and dexamethasone (VDD) is further increased after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) [abstract 3093]. Blood. 2006. 108:882a. [Full Text].

  40. Kyle RA. High-dose therapy in multiple myeloma and primary amyloidosis: an overview. Semin Oncol. 1999 Feb. 26(1):74-83. [Medline].

  41. Lee AI, Munshi NC. Integration of novel agents into treatment of myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2007 Aug. 7(suppl 5):S215-21. [Medline].

  42. Oakervee HE, Popat R, Curry N, et al. PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, doxorubicin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2005 Jun. 129(6):755-62. [Medline].

  43. Pelosi F Jr, Capehart J, Roberts WC. Effectiveness of cardiac transplantation for primary (AL) cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 15. 79(4):532-5. [Medline].

  44. Popat R, Oakervee HE, Curry N, et al. Reduced dose PAD combination therapy (PS-341/bortezomib, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) for previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma [abstract 2554]. Blood. 2005. 106:171a-718a. [Full Text].

  45. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26. 348(26):2609-17. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  46. Richardson PG1, Siegel DS, Vij R, Hofmeister CC, Baz R, Jagannath S, et al. Pomalidomide alone or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 study. Blood. 2014. 123:1826-32. [Full Text].

  47. Rubinow A, Skinner M, Cohen AS. Digoxin sensitivity in amyloid cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1981 Jun. 63(6):1285-8. [Medline].

  48. Simons M, Isner JM. Assessment of relative sensitivities of noninvasive tests for cardiac amyloidosis in documented cardiac amyloidosis. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Feb 1. 69(4):425-7. [Medline].

  49. Solomon A, Weiss DT, Murphy C. Primary amyloidosis associated with a novel heavy-chain fragment (AH amyloidosis). Am J Hematol. 1994 Feb. 45(2):171-6. [Medline].

  50. van Gameren II, Hazenberg BP, Bijzet J, van Rijswijk MH. Diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue aspiration for detecting systemic amyloidosis and its utility in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun. 54(6):2015-21. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  51. Yood RA, Skinner M, Rubinow A, Talarico L, Cohen AS. Bleeding manifestations in 100 patients with amyloidosis. JAMA. 1983 Mar 11. 249(10):1322-4. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
The relationship among light chain–type amyloidosis (AL), the other monoclonal plasma cell disorders, and the other amyloidoses. Ig = immunoglobulin; MGUS = monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.