Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Stapedectomy

  • Author: Rodney C Diaz, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  more...
 
Updated: Mar 03, 2016
 

Background

History of Procedure

Hearing loss due to stapes fixation was first described by Valsalva in 1704 in his volume on the human ear.[1] It is unknown when the first attempts at stapes surgery were performed, although Kessel is credited as being the founder of stapes surgery in the 1870s.

Early attempts at stapes mobilization were fraught with complications, including fatal labyrinthitis, and provided hearing gain for only days. These results prompted leading otologists in 1899 at the Sixth International Otology Congress to declare stapes surgery useless, dangerous, and unethical,[2] thus ending further work on stapes mobilization procedures.

Following the turn of the 20th century, interest in surgery for stapes fixation was again reignited when Holmgren developed the fenestration procedure, in which a fenestra is created in the lateral semicircular canal, allowing sound to bypass the fixed stapes altogether. This was modified again by Sourdille in the 1930s, but it was Lempert who was credited with popularizing the fenestration procedure when, in 1938, he demonstrated a single-stage endaural fenestration procedure, which was quickly adopted as the procedure of choice for stapes ankylosis.

The current era of stapedectomy was started by Shea in the 1950s, when he created the first stapes prosthesis from Teflon. Various prostheses were then created during the following decade. The concept of stapes footplate surgery also changed, with various authors suggesting removing only portions of the footplate before placement of the prosthesis, and ultimately to the concept of the stapedotomy, in which a small hole is created in the fixated footplate for placement of the prosthesis. This allowed placement of the prosthesis piston into an appropriately sized hole and minimized the potential injury to the inner ear. Such techniques are still used today as the primary method of stapes surgery.

Next

Indications

Indications and selection criteria for stapedectomy are as follows:

  • Reasonably good health to tolerate anesthesia, especially if general anesthesia is needed
  • Conductive hearing loss due to fixation of the stapes
  • Presence of an air-bone gap of at least 15 dB across 3 frequencies confirmed with tuning-fork testing
  • Good cochlear reserve as demonstrated by presence of good speech discrimination, although this is not a universal requirement

The ear with poorer hearing, based on the patient’s report rather than audiography, should undergo the operation first. In bilateral cases, the second ear can be operated on 6 months later, assuming this is now the poorer-hearing ear.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Contraindications to stapedectomy include the following:

  • Poor physical health
  • Current vertigo or balance problems such as active Meniere disease or especially in the case of superior semicircular canal dehiscence, in which the corresponding air-bone gap can potentially mimic otosclerosis
  • A fluctuating type hearing loss
  • Pre-existing tympanic membrane perforation
  • Active external or middle ear infection
  • An air-bone gap less than 15 dB across 3 frequencies
Previous
Next

Technical Considerations

Safe and effective stapedectomy requires a thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the middle ear and proper identification of anatomical variants if present. For more information, see Ear Anatomy.

Previous
Next

Outcomes

Surgery is considered successful when the air-bone gap is closed to less than 10 dB across 90% or more of frequencies on postoperative audiography.

Large studies of thousands of patients who have undergone stapedectomy show that the success rate generally exceeds 95% for primary cases and 50%-70% in revision cases.[3, 4]

The failure rate is approximately 5%-10% overall with stapedectomy, which most commonly results from prosthesis malposition. The second most common cause of failure is necrosis of the incus. Recent reports also suggest that patients with otosclerosis are at a higher risk of sensorineural hearing loss than hearing loss due to presbycusis.[5] The authors of this article suggest continued follow-up, as most patients who undergo this procedure ultimately require auditory rehabilitation or hearing aids.

Complications

Potential complications of stapedectomy include the following:

  • Tympanic membrane perforation
  • Floating or subluxed stapes footplate
  • Perilymph gusher
  • Facial nerve injury
  • Dysgeusia
  • Hearing loss
  • Vertigo
  • Failure of prosthesis

Tympanic membrane perforation

If a small perforation occurs during surgery, a fat or fascia myringoplasty or medial graft tympanoplasty can be performed to repair the defect intraoperatively, and stapes surgery can proceed. If a larger perforation is created or encountered, the safest choice is to perform tympanoplasty only and stage the stapedectomy to a subsequent procedure.

Floating or subluxed stapes footplate

This may occur during down-fracture of the stapes superstructure when the footplate can become separated from the annular ligament that attaches it to the oval window. If this occurs, the footplate may be completely pushed into the vestibule. If the footplate does enter the vestibule, the operation should be aborted and the oval window covered with fascia and the prosthesis placed. If the footplate is not completely submerged, it can be removed with small hooks if a pre-existing control hole was made.

Once retrieved, a fascial graft and the prosthesis can be placed. An alternative is to allow the footplate to become re-fixed and then return for the placement of the prosthesis later.

Perilymph gusher

If the cochlear aqueduct is widely patent, there may be excessive perilymph flow once the fenestration has been created. In such cases, it is usually not noted until the footplate has already been opened or removed. Usually, the flow of fluid diminishes and stops.

The head of the bed should be immediately elevated if a gusher is encountered. A fascia plug that can underlie the prosthesis should be fashioned, and this should be held in place while the prosthesis is placed. In rare cases, a lumbar drain is necessary to reduce intracranial pressure sufficiently to stop the flow of perilymph. The middle ear and external auditory canal should also be packed to reduce flow as much as possible.

Facial nerve injury

The facial nerve is frequently dehiscent in its tympanic segment; however, this dehiscence is on the undersurface and rarely appreciated in most cases. If the dehiscent segment is sufficiently large, the nerve may prolapse and partially cover the footplate. If this is the case, the nerve may be gently retracted superiorly in order to expose the footplate and place the prosthesis. Generally, if the prosthesis must be bent to be placed, it will not provide a satisfactory hearing result. Additionally, when the nerve is dehiscent, extreme care must be used with the laser, as the heat damage from a direct hit with the laser can lead to a facial palsy.

The facial nerve monitor may aid the surgeon by providing feedback during microdissection in the vicinity of the nerve but will not eliminate the risk of facial nerve injury.

Dysgeusia

Taste disturbances can result from injury to the chorda tympani. During the procedure, the chorda tympani is frequently in a position that obstructs a full view of the oval window. If this is the case, the nerve can be gently retracted superiorly or inferiorly. If, however, a significant stretch or partial tear develops, the nerve should be completely severed, since patients will have shorter-lived dysgeusia if the nerve is completely sectioned rather than partially injured. Some patients report of a metallic taste on the operated side if the nerve is cut.

Unilateral chorda tympani loss is usually not a devastating injury for patients; however, in patients who will undergo bilateral middle ear surgery, great care should be taken to ensure that at least one fully functional nerve remains. Patients in whom bilateral chorda tympani have been sacrificed can suffer from dry mouth and severe taste disturbances.

Hearing loss

Sensorineural hearing loss can result from damage to the cochlea during excessive manipulation of the stapes or inadvertent injury to the cochlea. Thankfully, this is an uncommon complication and is slightly more common in revision cases. Generally, the only therapy is amplification in appropriate patients.

Vertigo

Vertigo can result from excessive manipulation of the stapes during surgery. This is slightly more common in revision cases and is ascertainable only if the patient is undergoing surgery under local anesthesia. If this occurs, the patient can be treated with intravenous droperidol and ondansetron to treat the vertigo.

This can also be caused by a prosthesis that is too long. If this is the case, the prosthesis should be removed and a shorter prosthesis used.

Failure of prosthesis

Failure of the prosthesis most commonly results from an inappropriately measured prosthesis. Rarely, the crimping is too tight on the incus, leading to necrosis of the end of the incus long process and displacement of the prosthesis. If this occurs, the prosthesis must be replaced in a modified fashion farther up on the incus long process or, occasionally, on the malleus manubrium.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Rodney C Diaz, MD Associate Professor of Otology, Neurotology, and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center

Rodney C Diaz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, North American Skull Base Society, Acoustical Society of America, Politzer Society, The International Society for Otologic Surgery and Science

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Levi G Ledgerwood, MD Resident Physician, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center

Levi G Ledgerwood, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA Professor of Otolaryngology, Dentistry, and Engineering, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Head and Neck Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a director, officer, partner, employee, advisor, consultant or trustee for: Cerescan;RxRevu;SymbiaAllergySolutions<br/>Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: Symbia<br/>Received from Allergy Solutions, Inc for board membership; Received honoraria from RxRevu for chief medical editor; Received salary from Medvoy for founder and president; Received consulting fee from Corvectra for senior medical advisor; Received ownership interest from Cerescan for consulting; Received consulting fee from Essiahealth for advisor; Received consulting fee from Carespan for advisor; Received consulting fee from Covidien for consulting.

References
  1. Valsalva, A. The Human Ear (Latin). Bononaie: C. Pisarri. 1704.

  2. Hausler R. General history of stapedectomy. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007. 65:1-5. [Medline].

  3. Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M. Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec. 27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47. [Medline].

  4. Gros A, Vatovec J, Zargi M, Jenko K. Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Nov. 26(6):1143-8. [Medline].

  5. Redfors YD, Moller C. Otosclerosis: thirty-year follow-up after surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Sep. 120(9):608-14. [Medline].

  6. Perkins RC. Laser stepedotomy for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope. 1980 Feb. 90(2):228-40. [Medline].

  7. Hodgson RS, Wilson DF. Argon laser stapedotomy. Laryngoscope. 1991 Mar. 101(3):230-3. [Medline].

  8. Bartels LJ. KTP laser stapedotomy: is it safe?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Nov. 103(5 ( Pt 1)):685-92. [Medline].

  9. Lesinski SG, Palmer A. Lasers for otosclerosis: CO2 vs. Argon and KTP-532. Laryngoscope. 1989 Jun. 99(6 Pt 2 Suppl 46):1-8. [Medline].

  10. Cuda D, Murri A, Mochi P, Solenghi T, Tinelli N. Microdrill, CO2-laser, and piezoelectric stapedotomy: a comparative study. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec. 30(8):1111-5. [Medline].

  11. Somers T, Vercruysse JP, Zarowski A, Verstreken M, Offeciers E. Stapedotomy with microdrill or carbon dioxide laser: influence on inner ear function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006 Dec. 115(12):880-5; discussion 886. [Medline].

  12. Somers T, Vercruysse JP, Zarowski A, Verstreken M, Schatteman I, Offeciers FE. Transient depression of inner ear function after stapedotomy: skeeter versus CO(2) laser technique. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2007. 65:267-72. [Medline].

  13. Caner G, Olgun L, Gultekin G, Aydar L. Local anesthesia for middle ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Aug. 133(2):295-7. [Medline].

  14. Farrior JB. Incisions in tympanoplasty: anatomic considerations and indications. Laryngoscope. 1983 Jan. 93(1):75-86. [Medline].

  15. Sedwick JD, Louden CL, Shelton C. Stapedectomy vs stapedotomy. Do you really need a laser?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Feb. 123(2):177-80. [Medline].

  16. Persson P, Harder H, Magnuson B. Hearing results in otosclerosis surgery after partial stapedectomy, total stapedectomy and stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997 Jan. 117(1):94-9. [Medline].

  17. Langman AW, Lindeman RC. Revision stapedectomy. Laryngoscope. 1993 Sep. 103(9):954-8. [Medline].

  18. Liang S, Irwin MG. Review of anesthesia for middle ear surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2010 Sep. 28(3):519-28. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.