Viral Pharyngitis Workup

  • Author: KoKo Aung, MD, MPH, FACP; Chief Editor: Burke A Cunha, MD   more...
 
Updated: Sep 26, 2011
 

Laboratory Studies

The similarity of signs and symptoms of viral pharyngitis make a specific etiological diagnosis virtually impossible without various laboratory tests. In many circumstances, etiological diagnosis is of no practical use because it may not alter the treatment and prognosis. Viral cultures are not needed to diagnose pharyngitis other than in a research setting.

The total WBC count may initially be slightly elevated without bandemia, followed by a decrease to fewer than 5000 cells/µL after 4-7 days of illness in about 50% of cases.

Atypical lymphocytosis is frequently associated with EBV and CMV infections.

Results from a rapid streptococcal antigen test and a bacterial culture of throat swab in viral pharyngitis may be positive (approximately 30% of patients with EBV infectious mononucleosis are colonized with group A streptococci).

Common cold

Specific virological diagnosis is unnecessary for practical purposes because it may not alter the management. Cultures of nasal secretions, serological tests, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques can be used for specific virological diagnosis. Rapid viral antigen detection tests are not sensitive enough to be useful.

EBV infectious mononucleosis

After week one of illness, peripheral blood film reveals relative and absolute lymphocytosis, with more than 10% atypical lymphocytes. Hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia secondary to anti-i antibodies are occasionally observed. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is elevated and liver function test results are mildly abnormal in about 90% of cases. Heterophile agglutination test (immunoglobulin M [IgM] antibody) results are positive with a titer of 40-fold or greater in 90% of affected adolescents and adults within the first few weeks after the onset of infectious mononucleosis symptoms. A mononucleosis spot test (Monospot) allows rapid screening for heterophile antibodies. Heterophile test results are usually negative in children younger than 4 years. Positive results for IgM antibody to viral capsid antigen and positive results for antibody to early antigen are useful to diagnose acute infection, particularly in cases that are heterophile negative.

Influenza

Leukopenia and proteinuria are nonspecific findings in influenza. Virus isolation or detection of viral antigen in respiratory secretions is very useful to diagnose acute illness. Virus can be readily isolated from nasal swab specimens, throat swab specimens, nasal washes, or combined nose-and-throat swab specimens by inoculation of embryonated eggs or cell cultures. Rapid detection of viral antigen directly in respiratory secretions can be accomplished by immunofluorescent (IF) studies, time-resolved immunofluorescence assay (TRFIA), radioenzyme immunoassay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

PCR techniques have been described for rapid detection of influenza virus RNA in clinical samples. Serological tests can be used, but they are not helpful for diagnosis and treatment of acute disease secondary to delay in obtaining the antibody titers in convalescent sera. Serological tests are useful for epidemiological purposes. A rise in complement-fixing and hemagglutination-inhibiting antibody levels during the second week is considered diagnostic of acute infection.

Enterovirus infection

Positive results on an enteroviral-specific reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test of throat swabs are diagnostic. Etiological diagnosis is not necessary for clinical purposes because it may not alter treatment.

RSV infection

RSV antigen in nasal secretions can be reliably detected with commercially available rapid tests.

CMV infection

A relative lymphocytosis is characteristic of acute CMV pharyngitis. Atypical lymphocytes may represent 10% or more of the total. CMV can be readily isolated from a throat swab. Positive results on the CMV-specific IgM antibody titers are diagnostic of acute infection. Results of heterophile tests are usually negative (heterophile-negative mononucleosis syndrome). A 4-fold or greater rise in antibody titers is confirmatory but useful only for epidemiological purposes.

Acute retroviral syndrome (primary HIV infection)

Serological test results for HIV are usually negative during the phase of acute retroviral syndrome because the test takes approximately 4 weeks for seroconversion. HIV RNA assay by PCR technique and p24 antigen assay can be used to help confirm the diagnosis. HIV viral load is usually extremely high. The peripheral blood picture may resemble infectious mononucleosis. Heterophile test results are usually negative (heterophile-negative mononucleosis syndrome).

 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

KoKo Aung, MD, MPH, FACP  Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Adjunct Associate Professor of Public Health, University of Texas School of Public Health

KoKo Aung, MD, MPH, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Ambrish Ojha, MD  Staff Physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Ambrish Ojha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Carson Lo  MD, Consultant, West Houston Infectious Disease Associates

Carson Lo is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Gregory William Rutecki  MD, Professor of Medicine, University of South Alabama Medical School

Gregory William Rutecki is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, and Society of General Internal Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Gordon L Woods, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center

Gordon L Woods, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Society of General Internal Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD  Clinical and Research Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital

Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Society for Microbiology, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Burke A Cunha, MD  Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital

Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Perkins A. An approach to diagnosing the acute sore throat. Am Fam Physician. Jan 1997;55(1):131-8, 141-2. [Medline].

  2. Bisno AL. Acute pharyngitis. N Engl J Med. Jan 18 2001;344(3):205-11. [Medline].

  3. Weckx LL, Ruiz JE, Duperly J, et al. Efficacy of celecoxib in treating symptoms of viral pharyngitis: a double-blind, randomized study of celecoxib versus diclofenac. J Int Med Res. Mar-Apr 2002;30(2):185-94. [Medline].

  4. Graham A, Fahey T. Evidence based case report. Sore throat: diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. BMJ. Jul 17 1999;319(7203):173-4. [Medline].

  5. Rimantadine for prevention and treatment of influenza. Med Lett Drugs Ther. Nov 26 1993;35(910):109-10. [Medline].

  6. Two neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment of influenza. Med Lett Drugs Ther. Oct 8 1999;41(1063):91-3. [Medline].

  7. Jefferson T, Jones M, Doshi P, Del Mar C. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. Dec 8 2009;339:b5106. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Jefferson T, Doshi P, Thompson M, Heneghan C. Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes?. BMJ. Jan 11 2011;342:c7258. [Medline].

  9. Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Heneghan CJ, Hama R, Thompson MJ. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children - a review of clinical study reports (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD008965 [database online]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011. Updated 4 May 2011.

  10. CDC. Seansonal Flu Weekly Report. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm. Accessed July 29, 2011.

  11. WHO. Infleunza Update. Available at http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/latest_update_GIP_surveillance/en/. Accessed July 29, 2011.

  12. Cingi C, Songu M, Ural A, Yildirim M, Erdogmus N, Bal C. Effects of chlorhexidine/benzydamine mouth spray on pain and quality of life in acute viral pharyngitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Ear Nose Throat J. Nov 2010;89(11):546-9. [Medline].

  13. Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, et al. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat?. JAMA. Dec 13 2000;284(22):2912-8. [Medline].

  14. Little P, Gould C, Williamson I, Warner G, Gantley M, Kinmonth AL. Reattendance and complications in a randomised trial of prescribing strategies for sore throat: the medicalising effect of prescribing antibiotics. BMJ. Aug 9 1997;315(7104):350-2. [Medline].

  15. McIsaac WJ, White D, Tannenbaum D, et al. A clinical score to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in patients with sore throat. CMAJ. Jan 13 1998;158(1):75-83. [Medline].

  16. Singh S, Dolan JG, Centor RM. Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis--a multi-criteria decision analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Mar 13 2006;6:14. [Medline].

  17. Cunha BA. Group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Emerg Med. 1990;22:93-96.

  18. Cunha BA. Group A streptococcal pharyngitis versus colonization. Intern Med. 1994;15:18-19.

  19. Cunha BA. The Sore Throat: Mycoplasma pneumoniae pharyngitis. Emerg Med. 1988;20:245-252.

  20. Gwaltney JM Jr, Bisno AL. Pharyngitis. In: Mandell GI, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas & Bennett's Principles of Infectious Diseases. Vol 1. Churchill Livingstone; 2000:656-62.

  21. Huovinen P, Lahtonen R, Ziegler T, et al. Pharyngitis in adults: the presence and coexistence of viruses and bacterial organisms. Ann Intern Med. Apr 15 1989;110(8):612-6. [Medline].

  22. McIsaac WJ, Goel V, Slaughter PM. Reconsidering sore throats. Part 2: Alternative approach and practical office tool. Can Fam Physician. Mar 1997;43:495-500. [Medline].

  23. McIsaac WJ, Goel V, Slaughter PM, et al. Reconsidering sore throats. Part I: Problems with current clinical practice. Can Fam Physician. Mar 1997;43:485-93. [Medline].

  24. Paradise JL. Etiology and management of pharyngitis and pharyngotonsillitis in children: a current review. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. Jan 1992;155:51-7. [Medline].

  25. Pichichero ME. Sore throat after sore throat after sore throat. Are you asking the critical questions?. Postgrad Med. Jan 1997;101(1):205-6, 209-12, 215-8, passim. [Medline].

  26. Wolter JM. Management of a sore throat. Antibiotics are no longer appropriate. Aust Fam Physician. Apr 1998;27(4):279-81. [Medline].

  27. Yoda K, Sata T, Kurata T, et al. Oropharyngotonsillitis associated with nonprimary Epstein-Barr virus infection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Feb 2000;126(2):185-93. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.