Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)

  • Author: Stephanie L Baer, MD; Chief Editor: Michael Stuart Bronze, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jul 25, 2016
 

Practice Essentials

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infectious diseases and is an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Typical bacterial pathogens that cause CAP include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis (see images below). However, with the advent of novel diagnostic technologies, viral respiratory tract infections are being identified as common etiologies of CAP. The most common viral pathogens recovered from hospitalized patients admitted with CAP include human rhinovirus and influenza.[1]

Gram stain showing Streptococcus pneumoniae. Gram stain showing Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Gram stain showing Haemophilus influenzae. Gram stain showing Haemophilus influenzae.

Presentation and pathogens in typical community-acquired pneumonia

The term “typical” CAP refers to a bacterial pneumonia caused by pathogens such as S pneumoniae, H influenzae, and M catarrhalis. Patients with typical CAP classically present with fever, a productive cough with purulent sputum, dyspnea, and pleuritic chest pain. Characteristic pulmonary findings on physical examination include the following:

  • Tachypnea
  • Rales heard over the involved lobe or segment
  • Increased tactile fremitus, bronchial breath sounds, and egophony may be present if consolidation has occurred.
  • Decreased tactile fremitus and dullness on chest percussion may result from parapneumonic effusion or empyema.

Epidemiologic data may provide clues to the specific pathogen causing CAP, as follows:

  • The most common overall pathogen is S pneumoniae
  • Underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [2] : H influenzae or M catarrhalis
  • Recent influenza infection [3] : Staphylococcus aureus
  • Alcoholic patient presenting with “currant jelly” sputum : Klebsiella pneumoniae [2]

Atypical community-acquired pneumonia

The clinical presentation of so-called “atypical” CAP is often subacute and frequently indolent. In addition, patients with atypical CAP may present with more subtle pulmonary findings, nonlobar infiltrates on radiography, and various extrapulmonary manifestations (eg, diarrhea, otalgia). Atypical CAP pathogens include the following:

  • Mycoplasma pneumoniae
  • Chlamydophila ( Chlamydia) pneumoniae
  • Legionnaires disease ( Legionella pneumophila)
  • Respiratory viruses, including the following:
  • Influenza A and B
  • Rhinovirus
  • Respiratory syncytial virus
  • Human metapneumovirus
  • Adenovirus 4 and 7
  • Parainfluenza virus
  • Other rare viral pneumonias include the following:
  • Coxsackievirus
  • Echovirus
  • Coronavirus (MERS-CoV, SARS)
  • Hantavirus
  • Epstein-Barr virus
  • Cytomegalovirus
  • Herpes simplex virus
  • Human herpesvirus 6
  • Varicella-zoster virus
  • Psittacosis ( Chlamydophila psittaci)
  • Q fever ( Coxiella burnetii)
  • Tularemia ( Francisella tularensis)Endemic fungi (causing subacute or chronic pneumonia), as follows:
  • Histoplasma capsulatum
  • Cryptococcus neoformans neoformans and neoformans gattii
  • Coccidioides immitis
  • Mycobacteria: Mycobacteria tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria (uncommon)

Extrapulmonary signs and symptoms seen in some forms of atypical CAP may include the following:

  • Mental confusion
  • Prominent headaches
  • Myalgias
  • Ear pain
  • Abdominal pain
  • Diarrhea
  • Rash (Horder spots in psittacosis; erythema multiforme in Mycoplasma pneumonia)
  • Nonexudative pharyngitis
  • Hemoptysis
  • Splenomegaly
  • Relative bradycardia

While historical clues and physical examination findings may suggest a causative pathogen, the clinical signs and symptoms of CAP are not sufficiently specific to reliably differentiate the exact etiologic agent.[4] Therefore, additional testing remains necessary to identify the pathogen and to optimize therapy in CAP.

Workup

Standard diagnostic studies for CAP include the following:

  • Chest radiography
  • Sputum Gram stain and/or culture
  • Blood cultures

Other laboratory tests

Depending on the perceived severity of illness and suspected etiology, additional workup may be warranted, including the following:

  • Complete blood cell (CBC) count with differential
  • Serum sodium level
  • Serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine levels
  • Serum transaminase levels
  • Serum phosphorus level
  • Lactic acid level
  • Creatine phosphokinase (CPK)
  • C-reactive protein (CRP)
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
  • Procalcitonin
  • Cold agglutinin titers
  • Urinary antigen testing for Legionella species and S pneumoniae
  • Serologic studies for M pneumoniae, C pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis, C burnetii
  • Molecular diagnostics, ie, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing

Chest radiography

Obtain chest radiographs in all patients with suspected CAP to evaluate for an infiltrate compatible with the presentation of CAP and to help exclude conditions that may mimic CAP (ie, lung cancer, pulmonary emboli).[5, 6] Patients who present very early with CAP may have negative findings on chest radiography. In these patients, repeat chest radiography within 24 hours may be beneficial. CT scanning may also be necessary in immunocompromised patients who present with symptoms that suggest CAP in whom chest radiography findings are negative. Serial chest radiography can be used to observe the progression of CAP; however, radiographic improvement may lag behind clinical improvement.

Hospital admission

Multiple scoring systems are available to assess the severity of CAP and to assist in deciding whether a patient should be hospitalized or admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The CURB-65 (confusion, uremia, respiratory rate, low blood pressure, age >65 years) and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) are currently recommended by the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines.[7] Patients with CURB-65 scores of 2 or more or PSI class IV-V may necessitate hospitalization or more intensive in-home services. ICU is recommended for any patient who requires mechanical ventilation or vasopressors. ICU admission should also be considered in patients with 3 or more minor risk factors, including respiratory rate of 30 or more, PaO2/FiO2<250, multilobar infiltrates, confusion, uremia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypothermia, and hypotension requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation.

Proposed scoring systems may also be helpful in certain populations to predict the severity of CAP. The SMART-COP score emphasizes the ability to predict the need for ventilator or vasopressor support and includes systolic blood pressure, multilobar infiltrates, serum albumin levels, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygenation, and pH level. The A-DROP (age, dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation, systolic blood pressure) is also a severity score. Recently, an expanded CURB-65 has been shown to improve prediction of 30-day mortality. It includes LDH, thrombocytopenia, and serum albumin, along with the traditional CURB-65, and has been shown to have better prediction accuracy.[8]

Antibiotic Therapy

Adequate antimicrobial therapy for CAP includes coverage for S pneumoniae and atypical bacterial pathogens. Outpatient treatment for CAP in patients with no comorbidities and no risk factors for drug-resistant S pneumoniae frequently includes the following:[7]

  •  A macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin)
  •  Doxycycline

Treatment in patients with comorbidities such as chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia; immunosuppression; prior antibiotics within 90 days; or other risk factors for drug-resistant infection includes the following:

  • Respiratory fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin)
  • Beta-lactam (high-dose amoxicillin 1 g 3 times/day) or amoxicillin/clavulanate (2 g twice daily), or ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, or cefuroxime (500 mg twice daily) plus a macrolide or doxycycline

In regions with high rates of macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae, consider a nonmacrolide alternative.

For hospitalized patients, therapy consists of the following:

  • Beta-lactams (ceftriaxone or cefotaxime) plus a macrolide or
  • Respiratory fluoroquinolone

Recent studies have suggested that a beta-lactam alone may be noninferior to a beta-lactam/macrolide combination or fluoroquinolone therapy in hospitalized patients.[9]

Therapy in ICU patients includes the following:

  • Beta-lactam (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ampicillin/sulbactam) plus either a macrolide or respiratory fluoroquinolone
  • For patients with penicillin allergy, a respiratory fluoroquinolone and aztreonam

 If Pseudomonas is suspected, therapy is as follows:

  • Anti-pneumococcal and anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, carbapenem [imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem]) plus ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin or
  • Beta-lactam (as above) plus aminoglycoside and azithromycin or aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone
  • For patients with penicillin allergy, aztreonam instead of the beta-lactam in the regimen listed above

If methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) is suspected, vancomycin, linezolid, or ceftaroline should be added.

Rapid initiation of therapy is important for improved outcomes in CAP, although blanket measures to hasten treatment are not without potential negative consequences. Quality-improvement efforts aimed at the administration of antibiotics within a certain time period have contributed to increased inappropriate antibiotic use and increased incidence of Clostridium difficile colitis. Nevertheless, in patients with signs of severe CAP or sepsis, antibiotics should be given within the first hour of hypotension onset to reduce mortality.[10] Cultures of respiratory specimens, blood, and pleural fluid; PCR of respiratory samples; or antigen tests should be used to target therapy whenever possible. Inpatient CAP therapy usually consists of intravenous antibiotics followed by transition to an oral course of therapy.[11, 12, 13, 14] Patients who are severely ill or who are unable to tolerate or absorb oral medications may require a longer duration of parenteral therapy before switching to an oral antibiotic.[15]

Mild to moderately ill patients with CAP may be treated entirely via the oral route, on either an inpatient or outpatient basis. The duration of therapy for uncomplicated CAP is usually 5-7 days.[7, 10] Patients should be afebrile for 48-72 hours and have no signs of instability before antibiotic therapy is stopped. The duration of therapy may need to be increased if the initial empiric therapy has no activity against the specific pathogen.

Immunocompromised hosts who present with CAP are treated in the same manner as otherwise healthy hosts but may require a longer duration of therapy. Investigations into pathogens associated with compromised hosts may need to be pursued.

Next

Overview

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infectious diseases addressed by clinicians and is an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide.

Numerous pathogens can cause CAP. Typical bacterial pathogens that cause CAP include S pneumoniae, H influenzae, and M catarrhalis. Numerous other organisms can cause CAP in the appropriate clinical setting. Furthermore, the so-called “atypical CAP” pathogens are actually common causes of CAP and were originally classified as atypical because they are not readily detectable on Gram stain or cultivatable on standard bacteriologic media.

CAP is usually acquired via inhalation or aspiration of a pathogenic organism.

Aspiration pneumonia is commonly caused by various pathogens (eg, aerobic/anaerobic oral organisms).

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

Severe CAP frequently develops in individuals with comorbid factors such as underlying cardiopulmonary disease, diminished splenic function, and/or heightened pathogenic virulence. Even in young and/or healthy hosts, severe CAP can develop if the causative pathogen is sufficiently virulent. For example, influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), and Legionnaires disease may present as severe CAP.[16, 17, 18, 19]

Patients with severe CAP should have the benefit of an infectious disease specialist to assist in the underlying cause of their condition.

Complications associated with community-acquired pneumonia

Complications in CAP depend on the infecting pathogen and the patient’s baseline health. For example, various organisms can cause empyema, including S pneumoniae, K pneumoniae (classically occurring in patients with chronic alcoholism), group A Streptococcus, and S aureus. Cavitation is not a typical feature of pneumococcal pneumonia but is relatively common in K pneumoniae infections.

On occasion, myocardial infarction can be precipitated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Patients with CAP who have impaired splenic function may develop overwhelming pneumococcal sepsis, potentially leading to death within 12-24 hours, regardless of the antimicrobial regimen used.

Morbidity and mortality

Morbidity and mortality associated with CAP are most common in elderly patients and immunocompromised hosts.

Other factors that can predispose to morbidity and mortality in individuals with CAP include significant comorbidities such as an increased respiratory rate, hypotension, fever, multilobar involvement, anemia, and hypoxia.[20]

For more information, see the following:

  • Mycoplasma Pneumonia
  • Bacterial Pneumonia
  • Viral Pneumonia
  • Imaging Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia
  • Aspiration Pneumonia
  • Nosocomial Pneumonia
  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
  • Pneumocystis (carinii) jiroveci Pneumonia
  • Fungal Pneumonia
  • Immunocompromised Pneumonia
  • Nursing Home Acquired Pneumonia
  • Chlamydial Pneumonia
  • Lymphocytic Interstitial Pneumonia
  • Imaging Typical Bacterial Pneumonia
  • Imaging Atypical Bacterial Pneumonia
  • Imaging Viral Pneumonia
Previous
Next

Etiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

The definitive microbiologic etiology is determined in only 38%-63% of patients who develop community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), depending on the patient population and diagnostic testing used.[1, 21] Organisms have been traditionally classified as “typical” or “atypical” CAP pathogens depending on their ability to be detected on Gram stain or standard bacterial cultures.

Typical community-acquired pneumonia pathogens

Typical bacterial pathogens that cause CAP include S pneumoniae, H influenza, and M catarrhalis (Gram stains shown below). The frequency with which CAP is attributable to one of these pathogens varies according to epidemiologic factors (eg, seasonality, patient demographics, exposure history) and the diagnostic testing used. In the past, these organisms had been reported to account for most CAP cases.[22] However, with improvement in diagnostic techniques allowing for better identification of viruses and fastidious bacteria, our understanding of the etiologic agents involved in the development of CAP has evolved. As a result, a smaller percentage of CAP cases are now being attributed to these typical bacterial pathogens.

Gram stain showing Streptococcus pneumoniae. Gram stain showing Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Gram stain showing Haemophilus influenzae. Gram stain showing Haemophilus influenzae.

S pneumoniae remains the most common bacterial agent responsible for CAP. The incidence of S pneumoniae pneumonia varies according to the population studied. A 2015 study of 267 patients with CAP in Norway reported that S pneumoniae accounted for 30% of cases; this represented 48.5% of the cases in which an organism was identified.[21] A separate study of adults with CAP in the United States identified S pneumoniae as the etiologic agent in only 5% of total cases of CAP (13.5% of cases with an identified pathogen).[1]

S aureus has not traditionally been considered a typical cause of CAP in otherwise healthy hosts. However, S aureus is well known to cause potentially severe CAP after influenza infection.[3] In addition, community-acquired methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) has increasingly been associated with multilobar necrotizing CAP, including in previously healthy individuals.

Importantly, K pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are not typical causes of CAP in otherwise healthy hosts. K pneumoniae CAP occurs primarily in individuals with chronic alcoholism or diabetes mellitus. P aeruginosa is a cause of CAP in patients with bronchiectasis or cystic fibrosis.

In certain patients admitted to the ICU, the microbial etiology of pneumonia may be complex. In a study by Cilloniz et al, 11% of cases were polymicrobial. The most frequently identified pathogens in polymicrobial infections were S pneumoniae, respiratory viruses, and P aeruginosa. Chronic respiratory disease and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) criteria were independent predictors of a polymicrobial infection.[23]

Other gram-negative pathogens (eg, Enterobacter species, Serratia species, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia cepacia) rarely cause CAP in patients without underlying lung disease or immunosuppression.

Atypical community-acquired pneumonia pathogens

Atypical bacterial pneumonias can be differentiated into those caused by zoonotic or nonzoonotic atypical pathogens.

Zoonotic atypical CAP pathogens include Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) psittaci (psittacosis), F tularensis (tularemia), and C burnetii (Q fever).

Nonzoonotic atypical CAP pathogens include Legionella species (Legionnaires disease), M pneumoniae, and C pneumoniae.[24]

Respiratory viruses are another important cause of atypical CAP. While certain viruses may be zoonotically transmitted (eg, Hantavirus and avian influenza), most are transmitted person-to-person.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Prevalence in the United States

The number of annual community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) cases is difficult to estimate. One study, in which 46,237 elderly patients were monitored over a 3-year period, showed the rate of CAP among those aged 65-69 years to be 18.2 cases per 1000 person-years. Among person older than 85 years, the rate was 52.3 cases per 1000 person-years. Estimates based on these data suggested that, annually, 1 of 20 persons older than 85 years develop CAP. The investigators also estimated that approximately 915,900 cases of CAP occur among elderly persons annually in the United States.[25, 26, 27]

In a more recent population-based surveillance study of CAP among adults presenting at one of 5 hospitals in Chicago and Nashville, the annual incidence of CAP was estimated to be 24.8 cases (95% CI; 23.5-26.1) per 10,000 adults.[1] The median age of patients presenting with CAP was 57 years (interquartile range, 46-71 years). Similar to the prior studies, the incidence of CAP increased with age.

The prevalence and cost of CAP in 2011 in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals was examined, including 35,380 episodes of CAP among 7,824,850 veterans, or 452 cases per 100,000 person-years. The estimated excess cost was $750,170,631, with over half incurred in patients older than 65 years.[28]

International prevalence

A retrospective study using a nationwide claims database to determine the incidence of CAP in the Netherlands identified 195,372 cases of CAP between 2008 and 2011.[29] This represented an average incidence of 295 cases per 100,000 population per year. The authors concluded that the mean annual cost of CAP in this population was 178 million euros, with a disproportionate amount (76%) of the cost being incurred by people older than 50 years.

Age

Advanced age is associated not only with a higher incidence of CAP but also with more severe disease, greater need for hospitalization, and higher mortality.[7, 30]

CAP encountered in the ambulatory setting is more common among young adults and is usually due to atypical CAP pathogens (eg, Mycoplasma pneumoniae).[31]

Previous
Next

Prognosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Negative prognostic factors in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) include preexisting lung disease, underlying cardiac disease, poor splenic function, advanced age, multilobar involvement, and delayed initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy.[32]

Previous
Next

Extrapulmonary Findings in Atypical Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Atypical community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has classically been associated with more extrapulmonary manifestations than typical bacterial CAP. However, there can be considerable overlap in the clinical presentation of CAP due to various pathogens such that a definitive microbiologic diagnosis cannot be made based on signs and symptoms alone. Certain constellations of findings in the setting of appropriate historical clues may suggest an increased likelihood of a specific pathogen, thus warranting a targeted investigation for that organism. A detailed review of all potential extrapulmonary findings in CAP is beyond the scope of this article; however, some classic associations are included below:

M pneumoniae CAP is associated with the following findings:[33]

  • Headache, fever, malaise, sore throat in young adult with insidious onset of cough
  • Erythema multiforme major (Stevens-Johnson syndrome)
  • Cardiac conduction abnormalities
  • Hemolytic anemia and cold-agglutinin syndrome
  • Neurologic abnormalities, including aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, transverse myelitis
  • Associated with epidemic outbreaks, eg, in schools or military barracks

Legionella pneumophila CAP (Legionnaires disease) is associated with the following findings:[34]

  • Gastrointestinal and neurologic symptoms in the setting of pneumonia
  • Positive history of waterborne exposure
  • Relative bradycardia during febrile episode
  • Hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level, elevated ferritin level, myoglobinuria
  • Leukocytosis with relative lymphopenia
  • Unresponsive to beta-lactam antibiotics
A case of Legionnaires disease from the Philadelph A case of Legionnaires disease from the Philadelphia outbreak, showing characteristics of relative bradycardia and extrapulmonary involvement.
This graph outlines a case of Legionella pneumonia This graph outlines a case of Legionella pneumonia, showing characteristics of bradycardia and extrapulmonary involvement. Also shown is an initial lack of response to beta-lactam antibiotics, followed by effective treatment with doxycycline.

C burnetii CAP (Q fever) is associated with the following findings:[35, 36]

  • Acute infection
  • Severe retrobulbar headache, myalgias, fever, rigors, nonproductive cough
  • Elevated levels of transaminases and thrombocytopenia
  • Maculopapular or purpuric rash
  • Zoonotic exposure (goats, sheep, cattle most common)

Community-acquired pneumonia and shock

With the exception of CAP due to particularly virulent organisms (eg, MRSA, Hantavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS], Legionella), CAP does not typically present with shock in otherwise healthy hosts. Therefore, in addition to considering the possibility of CAP due to a hypervirulent pathogen, patients who present with fever, dyspnea, leukocytosis, pulmonary infiltrates, and shock in the absence of conditions associated with hyposplenism should be evaluated for imitators of pneumonia, such as acute myocardial infarction or acute pulmonary embolism.

Conditions that predispose to severe CAP should be considered in patients presenting with CAP and shock in the absence of one of the aforementioned cardiopulmonary diseases. The following disorders and therapies have been associated with severe CAP:

  • Chronic alcoholism
  • Amyloidosis
  • Chronic active hepatitis
  • Fanconi syndrome
  • Hyposplenism in elderly patients
  • Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency
  • Intestinal lymphangiectasia
  • Myeloproliferative disorders
  • Waldenström macroglobulinemia
  • Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • Celiac disease
  • Regional enteritis
  • Sézary syndrome
  • Congenital asplenia
  • Splenectomy
  • Sickle cell trait/disease
  • Splenic infarcts
  • Splenic malignancies
  • Corticosteroid therapy
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
  • Systemic mastocytosis
  • Systemic necrotizing vasculitis
Previous
Next

Patient History

Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) due to typical bacterial CAP pathogens typically present with fever, dyspnea, and productive cough, often with pleuritic chest pain.

The clinical presentation of atypical CAP is more often subacute and associated with extrapulmonary manifestations that may provide a clue to the etiology.

Zoonotic infection

Contact with the appropriate zoonotic vector or its by-product (eg, milk, urine, feces, placenta) is needed to develop a zoonotic CAP. A history of occupational exposure to livestock (eg, farmers, veterinarians) or close contact with a parturient animal should be sought in patients with suspected Q fever. Psittacosis is preceded by recent contact with birds infected with C psittaci. Occupations and avocations associated with increased risk include poultry farming, pet shops, veterinary clinics, and ownership of pet birds (classically of the psittacine, or parrot, family). Hantavirus is transmitted via exposure to wild rodents, specifically to aerosolized rodent urine or feces; thus, queries as to whether a patient presenting with severe CAP works or recreates in a setting conducive to rodent exposure (eg, farms, ranches, forests) is warranted.

Previous
Next

Physical Examination

Purulent sputum is characteristic of pneumonia caused by bacterial community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens and is not usually a feature of pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens, with the exception of Legionnaires disease. Blood-tinged sputum may be found in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia, Klebsiella pneumonia, or Legionella pneumonia.

Rales are heard over the involved lobe or segment. Consolidation may be accompanied by an increase in tactile fremitus, bronchial breathing, and egophony.

Legionella pneumonia, Q fever, and psittacosis are atypical pneumonias that may present with signs of consolidation. Consolidation is not a typical feature of pneumonia caused by M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae.[24]

Be wary when a patient presents with severe CAP, with or without hypotension or shock. In these patients, be sure to exclude an underlying immunocompromise, asplenia, or acute pulmonary or cardiac event that could explain the severity of the CAP.

Pleural effusion

Pleural effusion, if large enough, may be detectable on physical examination. In addition, patients with pleural effusion also have decreased tactile fremitus and dullness on chest percussion.

Empyema

On physical examination, empyema has the same findings as pleural effusion.

Previous
Next

Differential Diagnoses of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Aside from those mentioned above, the differential diagnoses to consider in the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) include the following:

  • Acute bronchitis
  • Acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis
  • Aspiration pneumonitis
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema
  • Pulmonary fibrosis
  • Sarcoidosis
  • SLE pneumonitis
  • Pulmonary drug hypersensitivity reactions (nitrofurantoin)
  • Drug-induced pulmonary disease
  • Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia
  • Pulmonary embolus or infarction
  • Bronchogenic carcinomas
  • Radiation pneumonitis
  • Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener granulomatosis)
  • Lymphomas
  • Tracheobronchitis
Previous
Next

Sputum Studies and Blood Culture

Send sputum samples from patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) for Gram stain and/or culture. Keep in mind that many patients, especially elderly persons, are not able to produce an adequate suitable sputum sample.

Sputum Gram stain is reliable and diagnostic if performed on a well-collected specimen without many squamous epithelial cells (saliva contamination) and if a predominant organism is present. Gram stain shows few or no predominant organisms in patients with atypical CAP.

Obtain blood cultures from all patients with CAP upon admission because some bacterial pathogens, such as S pneumoniae and H influenzae, are frequently associated with positive blood cultures. M catarrhalis bacteremia is rare.

Previous
Next

Studies in HIV-Positive Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

The differential diagnoses of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is broader than in HIV-negative patients. The patient’s immunologic status, as reflected by the CD4 count, the clinical course, and the chest radiographic appearance, provides clues to the most likely etiologic organism.

Patients with HIV infection and a normal or slightly decreased CD4 count with focal infiltrates have approximately the same pathogen distribution as otherwise healthy hosts (eg, S pneumoniae is most common) and thus warrant the same diagnostic strategies as the general population. Pneumocystis (carinii) jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) should be suspected in patients with a CD4 count of less than 200 cells/µL presenting with gradually progressive dyspnea, nonfocal infiltrates on chest radiography, nonproductive cough, and hypoxemia. A definitive diagnosis of PJP requires visualization of the P jirovecii cysts (ie, using special stains such as Giemsa or methenamine silver); bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is often necessary to obtain an adequate specimen.

Individuals with HIV infection are also at increased risk for active pulmonary tuberculosis; the radiographic appearance of tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients varies, so tuberculosis should be considered in all patients with HIV and a pulmonary infiltrate. Patients with HIV and CAP should therefore be placed on airborne isolation (unless other etiology identified) until tuberculosis is excluded with three negative findings on acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears/sputum cultures.

Additional uncommon CAP pathogens, such as histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and cryptococcosis, should also be considered in HIV-positive patients who present with pulmonary infiltrates, with risk stratified according to potential exposure history. Antigen testing (urine antigen for histoplasmosis; serum antigen for cryptococcosis) may be helpful in these cases.

Previous
Next

Other Laboratory Tests for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Several nonspecific laboratory tests are often performed during the workup of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), particularly if atypical CAP is suspected.

Serum transaminase, serum sodium, serum ferritin, serum phosphorus, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels may provide evidence supporting a particular pathogen, such as Legionella. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and procalcitonin may help predict the likelihood of a bacterial origin for CAP. Serum lactic acid, white blood cell (WBC) count, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine may be used in categorizing the severity of illness.

Cold agglutinin titers of 1:32 or greater may support a diagnosis of M pneumoniae, however this test is neither sensitive nor specific.

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels

A prospective study of 75 children with CAP, including 37 who met the criteria for presumed pneumococcal CAP (P-CAP), found procalcitonin (PCT) and CRP levels to be reliable markers of P-CAP.[37] High levels of these markers were strongly associated with P-CAP. Whereas a PCT value of 0.5 ng/mL or lower ruled out P-CAP in more than 90% of cases, a value of 1.5 ng/mL or higher in association with a positive pneumococcal urinary antigen test result, yielded a diagnostic probability of almost 80% for P-CAP.[38]

Agglutinin levels

Cold-agglutinin antibodies (immunoglobulin M [IgM] autoantibodies directed against the erythrocyte) develop in 50%-75% of patients with M pneumoniae infection, peaking approximately 2 weeks into the illness. However, this finding is nonspecific, as low-titer cold-agglutinin elevations occur in various viral and neoplastic illnesses. Furthermore, a negative cold agglutinin titer finding does not exclude Mycoplasma infection.

Direct fluorescent antibody testing

Direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing of the sputum can be performed to try to assist with the diagnosis of atypical CAP pathogens, including Legionella, P jiroveci, and Chlamydophila; however, the utility of this test is hampered by suboptimal sensitivity and is relatively difficult to perform. A DFA stain showing Legionella infection is seen in the image below.

Sputum direct fluorescent antibody stain showing L Sputum direct fluorescent antibody stain showing Legionella infection.

Serology

Serology can be useful in identifying fastidious organisms, particularly when dealing with pathogens with potential epidemiologic implications (ie, epidemic or biohazard situations), such as B pertussis, M pneumoniae, L pneumophila, or C burnetii. Serologic diagnosis is based on a 4-fold or greater increase in titers between acute- and convalescent-phase serum specimens so is generally not useful in the acute-care setting. A significantly elevated IgM titer (typically present in the acute phase of infection) may help support a diagnosis, and some experts have suggested that combining IgM and nucleic acid amplification testing may be the optimal method for diagnosing M pneumoniae infection.[39]

Urinary antigen test

Pneumococcal urinary antigen testing is a useful non–culture-based test for diagnosing pneumococcal infection that has a reported sensitivity of 50%-80% and specificity of more than 90%.[40] Availability of the assay is the main perceived barrier to its routine use.[40]

Urinary antigen testing is considered the first-line diagnostic test for L pneumophila. The sensitivity of the test ranges from 55%-99%, with improved sensitivity paralleling disease severity.[34] The urinary antigen test is applicable only for L pneumophila serogroup type I, which accounts for approximately 80% of infections. The urinary antigen test remains positive for Legionella for long periods but may be negative within the first 48 hours of infection.

Polymerase chain reaction

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as an important diagnostic tool for determining the etiology of CAP, particularly with regard to respiratory viruses and fastidious organisms, including Legionella, Mycoplasma, and Chlamydophila.[2] PCR is a very sensitive and specific method for isolating these pathogens. The increasing commercial availability of various PCR assays (including multiplex) will allow for increased implementation in the clinical setting. However, interpreting the isolation of organisms known to colonize the upper airway or those that may be associated with protracted shedding, such as rhinovirus, remains a challenge. Quantitative PCR methods have shown some promise in improving interpretability of such findings.[41]

A 2016 study in the United Kingdom assessed the use of comprehensive molecular testing of a single lower respiratory tract specimen to detect a pathogen in CAP.[42] The study compared (1) a combination of real-time multiplex PCR assays targeting 26 different pathogens, including bacteria and viruses, with (2) culture-based diagnostic testing of the same specimens. Quantification of bacterial load was performed for 8 common bacteria, including S pneumoniae, H influenzae, and M catarrhalis. A pathogen was detected in 87% of patients with CAP using the multiplex assay, whereas culture achieved a diagnosis in only 39% of cases. Viruses were detected in 30% of cases. H influenzae and S pneumoniae were the most commonly detected bacteria. Pathogen detection was not significantly decreased when a quantitative threshold for detection of ≥105 CFU/mL for all bacterial loads was applied, although the mean bacterial load was lower in patients who had received prior antibiotics than in those who had not. Interestingly, of the 268 patients who received antibiotics prior to testing, 77.6% had a positive bacterial PCR finding, but only 32% were culture-positive. The authors concluded that comprehensive molecular testing on a lower respiratory tract specimen has the potential to positively affect targeted antibiotic therapy in most patients with CAP.

Previous
Next

Chest Radiography and CT Scanning

Chest radiography

Obtain chest radiographs in all patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to exclude conditions that mimic CAP and to confirm the presence of an infiltrate compatible with the presentation of CAP.[5, 6] (See the images below.)

Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection, Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection, bilateral perihilar infiltrates, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.
Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection a Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection and focal infiltrates due to tuberculosis.

Chest radiography findings may be negative in patients who present very early with CAP. In these patients, repeat chest radiography within 24 hours is recommended.

Chest radiography may assist with the differentiation of viral pneumonias from nonviral pneumonias. Viral pneumonias tend to display few or no infiltrates on chest radiography, but, when infiltrates are present, they are almost always bilateral, perihilar, symmetric, and interstitial.

Bacterial pneumonias have a predominantly focal segmental or lobar distribution, with or without pleural effusions. Atypical bacterial pathogens have variable radiographic findings, ranging from focal segmental to bilateral interstitial disease. P jiroveci (PJP) pneumonia typically manifests as bilateral patchy interstitial infiltrates. Of note, radiographic findings alone are not reliable for differentiating specific etiologies of CAP.

Chest radiographic findings should be negative in patients with asthma or exacerbation of chronic bronchitis who do not have CAP.

The infiltrates observed with congestive heart failure (CHF) appear as increased interstitial markings and show vascular redistribution to the upper lobes. Patients with preexisting heart failure usually have cardiomegaly.

Rapid cavitation is not a typical feature of CAP.

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant S aureus (CA-MRSA) CAP presents as a fulminant CAP with rapid cavitation and necrotizing pneumonia caused by CA-MRSA (SCC mec IV) with the PVL gene, which sometimes occurs after influenza.

Serial chest radiography can be used to observe the progression of CAP. Chest radiographic findings worsen rapidly and require a significant period to improve. It is important to note that clinical resolution occurs long before radiologic resolution.

CT scanning

Obtain a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest when an underlying bronchogenic carcinoma is suggested or if any abnormalities are not consistent with the diagnosis of pneumonia. Immunocompromised patients may benefit from further narrowing of differential diagnoses with chest CT scanning.

Previous
Next

Fine-Needle Aspiration, Transtracheal Aspiration, and Bronchoscopy With Bronchoalveolar Lavage

Diagnostic bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be useful in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) when Pneumocystis, mycobacteria, or fungal pathogens are likely. Diagnostic bronchoscopy with BAL with or without biopsy may also be useful in unresolving CAP that does not respond to appropriate therapy.

Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the infiltrate can be performed and is most useful in determining the cause of nodules or non–infection-associated infiltrates that are not responding to antibiotic treatment.

Transtracheal aspiration (TTA) is a potentially hazardous procedure and offers no additional diagnostic information in patients with CAP.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Lung sections with typical bacterial pneumonias show the progression from red hepatization to white hepatization during the resolution process. The lung is repaired or scarred after bacterial pneumonia is complete and the infectious process resolves.

Previous
Next

Hospital Care in Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Although patients with mild community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) may be treated in an ambulatory setting, patients with CAP who are moderately to severely ill should be hospitalized. Patients with severe CAP require admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Oxygen and/or ventilatory support may be required.[18, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47]

Because the severity of CAP is frequently due to underlying chronic disease, provide evidence-based sepsis management while administering antibiotics for CAP.

Patients admitted with severe CAP and hypotension or shock are often hypotensive because of sepsis.

If no acute cardiopulmonary explanation can be found (eg, exacerbation of severe underlying lung disease, exacerbation of preexisting CHF), patients with shock likely have diminished or absent splenic function or immunocompromise.

Previous
Next

Pharmacologic Therapy

There is no optimal therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Most experts feel that coverage should be divided against typical and atypical CAP pathogens.[48] Excellent practice guidelines have been promulgated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS). These resources provide evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of outpatients, inpatients, and ICU patients with CAP.[7]

Adequate therapy for CAP includes coverage for S pneumoniae and atypical bacterial pathogens. Treatment options for CAP in outpatients with no comorbidities and no risk factors for drug-resistant S pneumoniae include the following:[7]

  • A macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin or erythromycin)
  • Doxycycline

Treatment options in patients with comorbidities such as chronic heart, lung, liver or renal disease; diabetes mellitus; alcoholism; malignancy; asplenia; immunosuppression; prior antibiotics within 90 days; or other risk for drug resistant infection include the following:

  • Respiratory fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin)
  • Beta-lactam (high-dose amoxicillin 1 g three times/day) or amoxicillin/clavulanate (2 g twice a day), or ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, or cefuroxime (500 mg twice daily) plus a macrolide or doxycycline

In regions with high rates of macrolide-resistant S pneumoniae, consider a nonmacrolide alternative.

In hospitalized patients, therapy consists of the following:

  • Beta-lactam (ceftriaxone) plus a macrolide or
  • Respiratory fluoroquinolone

Recent studies have suggested that the use of a beta-lactam alone may be noninferior to a beta-lactam/macrolide combination or fluoroquinolone therapy in hospitalized patients.[9]

Therapy in ICU patients includes the following:

  • Beta-lactam (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ampicillin/sulbactam) plus either a macrolide or respiratory fluoroquinolone
  • For patients with penicillin allergy, a respiratory fluoroquinolone and aztreonam

Patients who are severely ill or unable to tolerate or absorb oral medications require a longer duration of intravenous therapy before switching to an oral antibiotic.[15] If Pseudomonas is suspected, an antipseudomonal beta-lactam (piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, imipenem, or meropenem) plus ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin is recommended. If MRSA is suspected, vancomycin or linezolid is recommended. For patients with penicillin allergy, aztreonam is used instead of the beta-lactam in the regimen listed above.

Mild to moderately ill patients with CAP may be treated entirely via the oral route, on either an inpatient or outpatient basis. Patients receiving oral antibiotics may be admitted for hospital services (eg, pulmonary toilet and additional diagnostic tests) that are not obtainable on an outpatient basis.

If the patient is switched to an oral regimen and is doing well, earlier discharge from the hospital is possible. The oral therapy regimen can be completed at home. Optimal intravenous-to-oral switch therapy consists of a single agent that has an appropriate spectrum, has excellent bioavailability, is well tolerated, has a low resistance potential, and is relatively inexpensive.

The duration of therapy for uncomplicated CAP is approximately 5-7 days.[7, 10] Patients should be afebrile 48-72 hours and have no signs of instability before antibiotic therapy is stopped. The duration of therapy may need to be longer if initial empiric therapy did not have activity against the detected pathogen. Very healthy young adults and children may be treated for shorter periods.

The use of systemic corticosteroids in patients with CAP may reduce the length of time until clinical stability, reduce hospital length of stay, reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, and reduce the incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).[49, 50] Recent clinical trials have also shown a possible overall reduction in mortality, although these later results remain in doubt.[51, 52] Furthermore, there is insufficient data or agreement on the dose or duration of the steroid therapy. Adverse effects noted in the studies have included hyperglycemia.[49] There are current ongoing double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials to examine the short- and long-term effects of corticosteroid use in the management of CAP.[50]

Comorbid conditions

Comorbid conditions do not affect the selection of antimicrobial therapy. The addition and/or change of antibiotics based on the severity of illness and/or comorbidities makes little sense. Antimicrobial therapy is directed against the pathogen rather than against the comorbid factors. Comorbidities are an important prognostic factor and contribute to the severity index.[32]

Severity

The severity of CAP may be estimated with scoring systems that consider age, end organ damage manifested as uremia and/or confusion, respiratory rate, and blood pressure (CURB-65).

Other scoring systems include the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), SMART-COP, A-DROP, and expanded CURB-65 (see Hospital admission). Prognosis is significantly affected by underlying conditions of the lungs, heart, and spleen.

Appropriate spectrum

In otherwise healthy hosts with CAP, therapy does not need to cover S aureus, Klebsiella species, or P aeruginosa. S aureus coverage should be included in patients with influenza who have focal infiltrates.

Most antibiotics used to treat community-acquired aspiration pneumonia (eg, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor) are highly effective against oral anaerobes. Metronidazole and clindamycin are unnecessary unless anaerobic lung infection is suspected. For aerobic lung abscesses, clindamycin or moxifloxacin is preferable.[53, 54, 55, 56] Coverage should include typical (S pneumoniae, H influenzae, M catarrhalis) and atypical (Legionella and Mycoplasma species, C pneumoniae) pathogens.

Monotherapy

Monotherapy coverage of typical and atypical pathogens in CAP is preferred over double-drug therapy; monotherapy is less expensive than double-drug regimens, while being as effective.[57]

Preferred monotherapy for CAP includes doxycycline or a respiratory quinolone. This is the most cost-effective way to optimally treat CAP. It is well-tolerated in oral and intravenous forms. It is ideal for intravenous-to-oral switch monotherapy in terms of patient compliance, safety, and cost.[58, 59]

Penicillin resistance

Most penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae infections may also be treated with beta-lactams. Alternately, doxycycline or respiratory quinolones may be used. Vancomycin is rarely, if ever, needed.

High-level penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae (MIC 6 µg/mL) strains are a rare cause of CAP, although they remain susceptible to ceftriaxone.

Proton-pump inhibitors

Avoid using proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in combination with respiratory quinolones for CAP drug therapy. The PPI should be discontinued or replaced with a histamine-2 (H2) blocker for the duration of therapy. However, there is conflicting evidence as to the safety of using PPIs and H2 blockers.[60, 61, 62, 63]

Eurich et al concluded that acid suppressants substantially increase the risk of recurrent pneumonia in high-risk elderly patients. In a cohort of elderly patients who had previously been hospitalized for pneumonia, the investigators studied PPI and H2 blocker use during 5.4 years of follow-up, matching 248 patients with recurrent pneumonia with 2476 controls.[60] Patients in the study who were currently using PPI/H2 blocker had a higher rate of recurrent pneumonia than did nonusers (12% vs 8%, respectively).

In contrast, a population-based, nested case-control study by Dublin et al concluded that PPIs and H2 blockers do not increase the risk of pneumonia in older adults.[62]

Compared with H2 blockers, PPIs were associated with an increased risk of C difficile colitis.[64]

Previous
Next

Outpatient Care in Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Monitor patients with mild community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who are being treated on an outpatient basis to ensure compliance with their medications and improvement. After 1 week, a repeat visit is advisable. If the patient is improving and parapneumonic complications are not evident, posttherapy chest radiography is unnecessary.[65, 66, 67]

The diet in patients with CAP is as tolerated. Guide activity with common sense.

Previous
Next

Vaccination

Pneumococcal vaccines have been shown to have some efficacy in preventing vaccine-strain pneumococcal pneumonia, bacteremia, and invasive disease. They have not been shown to prevent community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of all kinds.[68, 69] Annual influenza vaccination has been shown to decrease pneumonia diagnoses, hospitalizations, and cardiac events in certain populations.[70, 71, 72, 73]

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended in all persons older than 6 months. The options for vaccination include the trivalent inactivated vaccine, the quadrivalent inactivated vaccine, the live attenuated intranasal quadrivalent vaccine, the trivalent inactivated cell culture vaccine, and the trivalent inactivated recombinant vaccine. The live attenuated nasal spray is approved for patients aged 2-49 years who are not pregnant, children receiving aspirin therapy, immunosuppressed persons, children with asthma in the past 12 months, individuals receiving antiviral medications, and caretakers of immunocompromised persons. Persons aged 18 years or older with egg allergy are eligible for the recombinant vaccine, which should be administered by a physician experienced in the management of allergic conditions. People with severe allergy to the flu vaccine should not receive it, and persons with history of Guillain-Barré syndrome should consult with their physician prior to being vaccinated.[74]

Two pneumococcal vaccines are approved in the United States; 13-valent polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13; Prevnar 13) is approved for children aged 6 weeks to 17 years and adults aged 50 years or older. The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23; Pneumovax 23) is approved for adults aged 65 years or older and persons aged 2 years or older who are at increased risk for pneumococcal disease.

On February 1, 2016, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) published updated recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in adults. The committee now recommends routine use of PCV13 in addition to PPSV23 for adults older than 65 years. It is recommended that an initial dose of PCV13 be given, followed by PPSV23 at least one year later. If PPSV23 has already been given, it should be followed by PCV13 a year later. A second dose of PPSV23 is not needed in immunocompetent hosts. If PPSV23 is inadvertently given prior to 1 year after PCV13, it does not need to be repeated.

In adults aged 19 years and older with immunocompromising conditions (eg, HIV, cancer, renal disease), functional or anatomic asplenia, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, or cochlear implants, it is recommended that they receive PCV13, followed by PPSV23 at least 8 weeks later. In patients who have previously received PPSV23 vaccine, administer 1 dose of PCV13 at least 1 year after the last PPSV23 dose. A second dose of PPSV23 is recommended 5 years after the first dose in persons in this category aged 19-64 years. If the first dose of PPSV23 was administered prior to age 65 years, an additional dose should be administered at age 65 years or at least 5 years after the prior dose. Subsequent doses of PPSV23 should not be given sooner than 8 weeks after a dose of PCV13 and 5 years after the most recent dose of PPSV23.[75]

Nonleukopenic compromised hosts, such as those with rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, or alcoholism, may not develop an antibody response to the pneumococcal vaccine and may therefore remain susceptible to pneumococcal pneumonia. The same is true concerning the use of the Haemophilus vaccine.

Previous
Next

Patient Instructions

Remind patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to comply with the medication even after they experience clinical improvement. Except in patients with heart failure, adequate hydration and preservation of the cough reflex during the convalescent period are important.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Stephanie L Baer, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University; Chief, Epidemiology and Infection Control, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center

Stephanie L Baer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Federation for Medical Research, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Jose A Vazquez, MD, FACP, FIDSA Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Georgia Regents University

Jose A Vazquez, MD, FACP, FIDSA is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International AIDS Society, International Immunocompromised Host Society, International Society for Infectious Diseases, Medical Mycological Society of the Americas, International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, HIV Medicine Association, Michigan Infectious Disease Society, National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, Mycological Society of America, Immunocompromised Host Society

Disclosure: Serve(d) as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: Allergan; Astellas; Pfizer<br/>Received research grant from: Merck; Astellas<br/>Received grant/research funds from Merck for independent contractor; Received honoraria from Forest for speaking and teaching; Received honoraria from Astellas for speaking and teaching; Received consulting fee from Cidara for consulting.

Rhonda E Colombo, MD, MHS Assistant Professor of Medicine, Director, Infectious Diseases Fellowship Program, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University

Rhonda E Colombo, MD, MHS is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Received salary from Medscape for employment. for: Medscape.

Charles V Sanders, MD Edgar Hull Professor and Chairman, Department of Internal Medicine, Professor of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine at New Orleans; Medical Director, Medicine Hospital Center, Charity Hospital and Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans; Consulting Staff, Ochsner Medical Center

Charles V Sanders, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics, The Foundation for AIDS Research, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation, Southwestern Association of Clinical Microbiology, Association of Professors of Medicine, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, American Clinical and Climatological Association, Infectious Disease Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orleans Parish Medical Society, Southeastern Clinical Club, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association of University Professors, American Association for Physician Leadership, American Federation for Medical Research, American Geriatrics Society, American Lung Association, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, American Thoracic Society, American Venereal Disease Association, Association of American Medical Colleges, Association of American Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Louisiana State Medical Society, Royal Society of Medicine, Sigma Xi, Society of General Internal Medicine, Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Received royalty from Baxter International for other.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD David Ross Boyd Professor and Chairman, Department of Medicine, Stewart G Wolf Endowed Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center; Master of the American College of Physicians; Fellow, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Medical Association, Oklahoma State Medical Association, Southern Society for Clinical Investigation, Association of Professors of Medicine, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Fred A Lopez, MD Associate Professor and Vice Chair, Department of Medicine, Assistant Dean for Student Affairs, Louisiana State University School of Medicine

Fred A Lopez, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Louisiana State Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Burke A Cunha, MD Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital

Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, Fakhran S, Balk R, Bramley AM, et al. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization among U.S. Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 30. 373 (5):415-27. [Medline].

  2. Musher DM, Thorner AR. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23. 371 (17):1619-28. [Medline].

  3. Cunha BA. Swine Influenza (H1N1) Pneumonia: Clinical Considerations. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2010. 24:203-228.

  4. Huijskens EG, Koopmans M, Palmen FM, van Erkel AJ, Mulder PG, Rossen JW. The value of signs and symptoms in differentiating between bacterial, viral and mixed aetiology in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Med Microbiol. 2014 Mar. 63 (Pt 3):441-52. [Medline].

  5. Boersma WG, Daniels JM, Löwenberg A, Boeve WJ, van de Jagt EJ. Reliability of radiographic findings and the relation to etiologic agents in community-acquired pneumonia. Respir Med. 2006 May. 100(5):926-32. [Medline].

  6. Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, Prokop M, Lammers JW, Hak E, Hoepelman AI. Patterns of resolution of chest radiograph abnormalities in adults hospitalized with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 15. 45(8):983-91. [Medline].

  7. [Guideline] Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1. 44 Suppl 2:S27-72. [Medline].

  8. Liu JL, Xu F, Hui Zhou, Wu XJ, Shi LX, Lu RQ, et al. Expanded CURB-65: a new score system predicts severity of community-acquired pneumonia with superior efficiency. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 18. 6:22911. [Medline].

  9. Postma DF, van Werkhoven CH, van Elden LJ, Thijsen SF, Hoepelman AI, Kluytmans JA, et al. Antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2. 372 (14):1312-23. [Medline].

  10. Wunderink RG, Waterer GW. Clinical practice. Community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 6. 370 (6):543-51. [Medline].

  11. Blasi F, Tarsia P. Value of short-course antimicrobial therapy in community-acquired pneumonia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec. 26 Suppl 3:S148-55. [Medline].

  12. Dunbar LM, Khashab MM, Kahn JB, Zadeikis N, Xiang JX, Tennenberg AM. Efficacy of 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Apr. 20(4):555-63. [Medline].

  13. Harrington Z, Barnes DJ. One drug or two? Step-down therapy after i.v. antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. Intern Med J. 2007 Nov. 37(11):767-71. [Medline].

  14. Scalera NM, File TM Jr. How long should we treat community-acquired pneumonia?. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Apr. 20(2):177-81. [Medline].

  15. Aliberti S, Blasi F, Zanaboni AM, Peyrani P, Tarsia P, Gaito S, et al. Duration of antibiotic therapy in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2010 Jul. 36(1):128-34. [Medline].

  16. Alvarez-Lerma F, Torres A. Severe community-acquired pneumonia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Oct. 10(5):369-74. [Medline].

  17. Brown SM, Jones BE, Jephson AR, Dean NC. Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec. 37(12):3010-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. Carron M, Freo U, Zorzi M, Ori C. Predictors of failure of noninvasive ventilation in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. J Crit Care. 2010 Sep. 25(3):540.e9-14. [Medline].

  19. Cunha BA. Severe Community-acquired Pneumoniae in the Critical Care Unit. Cunha BA (ed). Infectious Disease in Critical Care Medicine. 3rd Ed. New York, New York: Informa Healthcare; 2010. pp. 164-177.

  20. Nakanishi M, Yoshida Y, Takeda N, Hirana H, Horita T, Shimizu K, et al. Significance of the progression of respiratory symptoms for predicting community-acquired pneumonia in general practice. Respirology. 2010 Aug. 15(6):969-74. [Medline].

  21. Holter JC, Müller F, Bjørang O, Samdal HH, Marthinsen JB, Jenum PA, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia and diagnostic yields of microbiological methods: a 3-year prospective study in Norway. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 15. 15:64. [Medline].

  22. Howard LS, Sillis M, Pasteur MC, Kamath AV, Harrison BD. Microbiological profile of community-acquired pneumonia in adults over the last 20 years. J Infect. 2005 Feb. 50(2):107-13. [Medline].

  23. Cilloniz C, Ewig S, Ferrer M, et al. Community acquired polymicrobial pneumonia in the intensive care unit: aetiology and prognosis. Crit Care. 2011 Sep 14. 15(5):R209. [Medline].

  24. Burillo A, Bouza E. Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2010 Mar. 24(1):61-71. [Medline].

  25. File TM Jr, Marrie TJ. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med. 2010 Mar. 122(2):130-41. [Medline].

  26. Fung HB, Monteagudo-Chu MO. Community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Feb. 8(1):47-62. [Medline].

  27. Jackson ML, Neuzil KM, Thompson WW, Shay DK, Yu O, Hanson CA, et al. The burden of community-acquired pneumonia in seniors: results of a population-based study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Dec 1. 39(11):1642-50. [Medline].

  28. McLaughlin JM, Johnson MH, Kagan SA, Baer SL. Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia in the Veterans Health Administration, 2011: a retrospective cohort study. Infection. 2015 Dec. 43 (6):671-80. [Medline].

  29. Rozenbaum MH, Mangen MJ, Huijts SM, van der Werf TS, Postma MJ. Incidence, direct costs and duration of hospitalization of patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia: A nationwide retrospective claims database analysis. Vaccine. 2015 Jun 22. 33 (28):3193-9. [Medline].

  30. Teramoto S, Yamamoto H, Yamaguchi Y, Hanaoka Y, Ishii M, Hibi S, et al. Lower respiratory tract infection outcomes are predicted better by an age >80 years than by CURB-65. Eur Respir J. 2008 Feb. 31 (2):477-8; author reply 478. [Medline].

  31. Marrie TJ, Poulin-Costello M, Beecroft MD, Herman-Gnjidic Z. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia treated in an ambulatory setting. Respir Med. 2005 Jan. 99(1):60-5. [Medline].

  32. Falguera M, Pifarre R, Martin A, Sheikh A, Moreno A. Etiology and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with diabetes mellitus. Chest. 2005 Nov. 128(5):3233-9. [Medline].

  33. Baum S. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and atypical pneumonia. Mandell, Bennett, & Dolin, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2010. Chapter 185.

  34. Cunha BA, Burillo A, Bouza E. Legionnaires' disease. Lancet. 2016 Jan 23. 387 (10016):376-85. [Medline].

  35. Anderson A, Bijlmer H, Fournier PE, Graves S, Hartzell J, Kersh GJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of Q fever--United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q Fever Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013 Mar 29. 62 (RR-03):1-30. [Medline].

  36. Marrie TJ, Raoult D. Coxiella burnetti (Q fever). Mandell G, BennettJ, Dolin R, eds. PPID. 7th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2009. Chapter 189.

  37. Galetto-Lacour A, Alcoba G, Posfay-Barbe KM, Cevey-Macherel M, Gehri M, Ochs MM, et al. Elevated Inflammatory Markers Combined with Positive Pneumococcal Urinary Antigen are a Good Predictor of Pneumococcal Community Acquired Pneumonia in Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013 May 20. [Medline].

  38. Giulia B, Luisa A, Concetta S, Bruna LS, Chiara B, Marcello C. Procalcitonin and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children. Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Dec 7. 451 (Pt B):215-8. [Medline].

  39. Loens K, Ieven M. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Current Knowledge on Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques and Serological Diagnostics. Front Microbiol. 2016. 7:448. [Medline].

  40. Harris AM, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Moore MR. Rapid urine antigen testing for Streptococcus pneumoniae in adults with community-acquired pneumonia: clinical use and barriers. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Aug. 79 (4):454-7. [Medline].

  41. Huijskens EG, Rossen JW, Kluytmans JA, van der Zanden AG, Koopmans M. Evaluation of yield of currently available diagnostics by sample type to optimize detection of respiratory pathogens in patients with a community-acquired pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014 Mar. 8 (2):243-9. [Medline].

  42. Gadsby NJ, Russell CD, McHugh MP, Mark H, Conway Morris A, Laurenson IF, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Testing for Respiratory Pathogens in Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1. 62 (7):817-23. [Medline].

  43. Davydov L, Ebert SC, Restino M, Gardner M, Bedenkop G, Uchida KM. Prospective evaluation of the treatment and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia according to the Pneumonia Severity Index in VHA hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Apr. 54(4):267-75. [Medline].

  44. Fishbane S, Niederman MS, Daly C, Magin A, Kawabata M, de Corla-Souza A. The impact of standardized order sets and intensive clinical case management on outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Aug 13-27. 167(15):1664-9. [Medline].

  45. Marrie TJ, Huang JQ. Low-risk patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 2005 Dec. 118(12):1357-63. [Medline].

  46. Marrie TJ, Shariatzadeh MR. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to an intensive care unit: a descriptive study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007 Mar. 86(2):103-11. [Medline].

  47. Yoshimoto A, Nakamura H, Fujimura M, Nakao S. Severe community-acquired pneumonia in an intensive care unit: risk factors for mortality. Intern Med. 2005 Jul. 44(7):710-6. [Medline].

  48. Genné D, Sommer R, Kaiser L, Saaïdia A, Pasche A, Unger PF. Analysis of factors that contribute to treatment failure in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Mar. 25(3):159-66. [Medline].

  49. Siemieniuk RA, Meade MO, Alonso-Coello P, Briel M, Evaniew N, Prasad M, et al. Corticosteroid Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6. 163 (7):519-28. [Medline].

  50. Restrepo MI, Anzueto A, Torres A. Corticosteroids for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Time to Change Clinical Practice. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Oct 6. 163 (7):560-1. [Medline].

  51. Snijders D, Daniels JM, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Efficacy of corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 1. 181 (9):975-82. [Medline].

  52. Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Menendez R, Mensa J, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015 Feb 17. 313 (7):677-86. [Medline].

  53. An MM, Zou Z, Shen H, Gao PH, Cao YB, Jiang YY. Moxifloxacin monotherapy versus beta-lactam-based standard therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010 Jul. 36(1):58-65. [Medline].

  54. Anzueto A, Niederman MS, Pearle J, Restrepo MI, Heyder A, Choudhri SH. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Recovery in the Elderly (CAPRIE): efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin therapy versus that of levofloxacin therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1. 42(1):73-81. [Medline].

  55. Davis SL, Delgado G Jr, McKinnon PS. Pharmacoeconomic considerations associated with the use of intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jul 15. 41 Suppl 2:S136-43. [Medline].

  56. Welte T, Petermann W, Schürmann D, Bauer TT, Reimnitz P,. Treatment with sequential intravenous or oral moxifloxacin was associated with faster clinical improvement than was standard therapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia who received initial parenteral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Dec 15. 41(12):1697-705. [Medline].

  57. Chokshi R, Restrepo MI, Weeratunge N, Frei CR, Anzueto A, Mortensen EM. Monotherapy versus combination antibiotic therapy for patients with bacteremic Streptococcus pneumoniae community-acquired pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Jul. 26(7):447-51. [Medline].

  58. Restrepo MI, Frei CR. Health economics of use fluoroquinolones to treat patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Med. 2010 Apr. 123(4 Suppl):S39-46. [Medline].

  59. Ailani RK, Agastya G, Ailani RK, Mukunda BN, Shekar R. Doxycycline is a cost-effective therapy for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Feb 8. 159(3):266-70. [Medline].

  60. Eurich DT, Sadowski CA, Simpson SH, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR. Recurrent community-acquired pneumonia in patients starting acid-suppressing drugs. Am J Med. 2010 Jan. 123(1):47-53. [Medline].

  61. Herzig SJ, Howell MD, Ngo LH, Marcantonio ER. Acid-suppressive medication use and the risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 2009 May 27. 301(20):2120-8. [Medline].

  62. Dublin S, Walker RL, Jackson ML, Nelson JC, Weiss NS, Jackson LA. Use of proton pump inhibitors and H2 blockers and risk of pneumonia in older adults: a population-based case-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug. 19(8):792-802. [Medline].

  63. Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Anzueto A. Common medications that increase the risk for developing community-acquired pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2010 Apr. 23(2):145-51. [Medline].

  64. Ro Y, Eun CS, Kim HS, Kim JY, Byun YJ, Yoo KS, et al. Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection with the Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients. Gut Liver. 2016 Jul 15. 10 (4):581-6. [Medline].

  65. Bjerre LM, Verheij TJ, Kochen MM. Antibiotics for community acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7. CD002109. [Medline].

  66. Carrie AG, Kozyrskyj AL. Outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: evolving trends and a focus on fluoroquinolones. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2006. 13(1):e102-11. [Medline].

  67. Segreti J, House HR, Siegel RE. Principles of antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in the outpatient setting. Am J Med. 2005 Jul. 118 Suppl 7A:21S-28S. [Medline].

  68. Bonten MJ, Huijts SM, Bolkenbaas M, Webber C, Patterson S, Gault S, et al. Polysaccharide conjugate vaccine against pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 19. 372 (12):1114-25. [Medline].

  69. Kim DK, Bridges CB, Harriman KH, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), ACIP Adult Immunization Work Group. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older--United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Feb 5. 65 (4):88-90. [Medline].

  70. Talbot HK, Zhu Y, Chen Q, Williams JV, Thompson MG, Griffin MR. Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations in adults, 2011-2012 influenza season. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jun. 56 (12):1774-7. [Medline].

  71. Phrommintikul A, Kuanprasert S, Wongcharoen W, Kanjanavanit R, Chaiwarith R, Sukonthasarn A. Influenza vaccination reduces cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul. 32 (14):1730-5. [Medline].

  72. Udell JA, Zawi R, Bhatt DL, Keshtkar-Jahromi M, Gaughran F, Phrommintikul A, et al. Association between influenza vaccination and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013 Oct 23. 310 (16):1711-20. [Medline].

  73. Powner J, Gallaher T, Colombo R, Baer S, Huber L, Kheda M, et al. Influenza vaccination reduced pneumococcal disease in incident dialysis patients. American Society of Nephrology. 2014.

  74. Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA. Prevention and Control of Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015-16 Influenza Season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Aug 7. 64 (30):818-25. [Medline].

  75. Kobayashi M, Bennett NM, Gierke R, Almendares O, Moore MR, Whitney CG, et al. Intervals Between PCV13 and PPSV23 Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Sep 4. 64 (34):944-7. [Medline].

  76. Mortensen EM, Halm EA, Pugh MJ, Copeland LA, Metersky M, Fine MJ, et al. Association of azithromycin with mortality and cardiovascular events among older patients hospitalized with pneumonia. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4. 311(21):2199-208. [Medline].

  77. Busko M. Azithromycin Benefits Outweigh MI Risks in Older Pneumonia Patients. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/826175. Accessed: June 9, 2014.

  78. Cunha BA. Elevated Serum Transaminases in Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005. 11:1051-1054.

  79. Cunha BA. Hypophosphatemia: Diagnostic Significance in Legionnaires' Disease. Am J Med. 2006. 119:5-6.

  80. Bradley, JS et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: Clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011. 53:e25-e76.

  81. Boselli E, Breilh D, Rimmelé T, Djabarouti S, Saux MC, Chassard D. Pharmacokinetics and intrapulmonary diffusion of levofloxacin in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan. 33(1):104-9. [Medline].

  82. Mokabberi R, Haftbaradaran A, Ravakhah K. Doxycycline vs. levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Apr. 35(2):195-200. [Medline].

  83. Noreddin AM, Elkhatib WF. Levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010 May. 8(5):505-14. [Medline].

  84. Cunha BA (ed). Pneumonia Essentials. 3rd Ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2010.

  85. Boulware DR, Daley CL, Merrifield C, Hopewell PC, Janoff EN. Rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia among HIV-infected adults with urine antigen detection. J Infect. 2007 Oct. 55(4):300-9. [Medline].

  86. Westley BP, Chan PA. Questions remain regarding mandatory use of macrolides in community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Oct. 36(10):1787; author reply 1789-90. [Medline].

  87. Iannini PB, Paladino JA, Lavin B, Singer ME, Schentag JJ. A case series of macrolide treatment failures in community acquired pneumonia. J Chemother. 2007 Oct. 19(5):536-45. [Medline].

  88. Lodise TP, Kwa A, Cosler L, Gupta R, Smith RP. Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov. 51(11):3977-82. [Medline].

  89. Johnstone J, Marrie TJ, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR. Effect of pneumococcal vaccination in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 8. 167(18):1938-43. [Medline].

  90. Tomczyk S, Bennett NM, Stoecker C, Gierke R, Moore MR, Whitney CG, et al. Use of 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine and 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine Among Adults Aged =65 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Sep 19. 63(37):822-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  91. Bonten M, Bolkenbaas M, Huijts S, et al. Community Acquired Pneumonia Immunization Trial in Adults (CAPiTA). Abstract no. 0541. Pneumonia 2014;3:95. Available at https://pneumonia.org.au/public/journals/22/PublicFolder/ABSTRACTBOOKMASTERforwebupdated20-3-14.pdf.

  92. Boggs W. Narrow-Spectrum Antibiotics Effective as Empiric Therapy for Pediatric Pneumonia. Medscape [serial online]. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/818253. Accessed: January 5, 2014.

  93. Queen MA, Myers AL, Hall M, Shah SS, Williams DJ, Auger KA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of empiric antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2014 Jan. 133(1):e23-9. [Medline].

  94. Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Pugh JA, Anzueto A. COPD is associated with increased mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2006 Aug. 28(2):346-51. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Gram stain showing Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Gram stain showing Haemophilus influenzae.
Gram stain showing Moraxella catarrhalis.
Clinical diagnostic approach in community-acquired pneumonias.
Sputum direct fluorescent antibody stain showing Legionella infection.
A case of Legionnaires disease from the Philadelphia outbreak, showing characteristics of relative bradycardia and extrapulmonary involvement.
This graph outlines a case of Legionella pneumonia, showing characteristics of bradycardia and extrapulmonary involvement. Also shown is an initial lack of response to beta-lactam antibiotics, followed by effective treatment with doxycycline.
Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection, bilateral perihilar infiltrates, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.
Chest radiograph in a patient with HIV infection and focal infiltrates due to tuberculosis.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.