Ehrlichiosis Differential Diagnoses
- Author: Burke A Cunha, MD; Chief Editor: Michael Stuart Bronze, MD more...
Diagnostic Considerations
Ehrlichiosis is a difficult infectious disease to diagnose because it manifests as an acute, undifferentiated, febrile, RMSF-like illness with few or no physical findings. Most patients who are diagnosed with RMSF without rash probably have ehrlichiosis. Co-infections of various tick-borne pathogens transmitted by the same vector are rare, but they do occur.
Ehrlichiosis has the same distribution as RMSF and is transmitted by the same tick species (eg, Amblyomma, Dermacentor). However, RMSF causes physical findings that ehrlichiosis does not, including bilateral periorbital edema, edema of the dorsum of the hands and feet, and conjunctival suffusion. The petechial rash of RMSF is absent in ehrlichiosis.
Laboratory findings associated with RMSF and ehrlichiosis are similar (eg, thrombocytopenia, relative lymphopenia, increased levels of serum transaminases, atypical lymphocytes). However, neutropenia is more common in ehrlichiosis than in RMSF.
Most patients with ehrlichiosis present with fever and a severe headache but do not have nuchal rigidity, as opposed to patients with aseptic or bacterial meningitis. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) profile in patients with ehrlichiosis is normal, in contrast to patients with viral or bacterial meningitis.
Other differential diagnostic possibilities include typhoid fever, malaria, and babesiosis. All of these infectious diseases manifest as acute, undifferentiated, febrile illnesses with a paucity of physical signs. The diagnosis of typhoid fever and malaria are suggested by an appropriate epidemiologic profile and/or travel history. Exposure to large Dermacentor ticks would suggest RMSF, whereas exposure to small Ixodes ticks would suggest the possibility of babesiosis.
Differential Diagnoses
CDC. Ehrlichiosis. Accessed May 16 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/ehrlichiosis.
Chapman AS, Bakken JS, Folk SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of tickborne rickettsial diseases: Rocky Mountain spotted fever, ehrlichioses, and anaplasmosis--United States: a practical guide for physicians and other health-care and public health professionals. MMWR Recomm Rep. Mar 31 2006;55:1-27. [Medline].
Buller RS, Arens M, Hmiel SP, et al. Ehrlichia ewingii, a newly recognized agent of human ehrlichiosis. N Engl J Med. Jul 15 1999;341(3):148-55. [Medline].
Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Horowitz HW, Wormser GP, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis: a case series from a medical center in New York State. Ann Intern Med. Dec 1 1996;125(11):904-8. [Medline].
Bakken JS, Dumler JS, Chen SM, et al. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in the upper Midwest United States. A new species emerging?. JAMA. Jul 20 1994;272(3):212-8. [Medline].
Heilpern KL. Update: human ehrlichiosis--Maryland and Wisconsin, 1994. Ann Emerg Med. Jul 1998;32(1):108-10. [Medline].
Lovrich SD, Jobe DA, Kowalski TJ, Policepatil SM, Callister SM. Expansion of the midwestern focus for human granulocytic anaplasmosis into the region surrounding la crosse, wisconsin. J Clin Microbiol. Nov 2011;49(11):3855-9. [Medline].
Pritt BS, Sloan LM, Johnson DK, Munderloh UG, Paskewitz SM, McElroy KM, et al. Emergence of a new pathogenic Ehrlichia species, Wisconsin and Minnesota, 2009. N Engl J Med. Aug 4 2011;365(5):422-9. [Medline].
Strle F. Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in Europe. Int J Med Microbiol. Apr 2004;293 Suppl 37:27-35. [Medline].
Hamburg BJ, Storch GA, Micek ST, Kollef MH. The importance of early treatment with doxycycline in human ehrlichiosis. Medicine (Baltimore). Mar 2008;87(2):53-60. [Medline].
Everett ED, Evans KA, Henry RB, McDonald G. Human ehrlichiosis in adults after tick exposure. Diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction. Ann Intern Med. May 1 1994;120(9):730-5. [Medline].
| Human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) | Human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA) | |
| Cell type Affected | Monocytes | Granulocytes |
| Organism | E chaffeensis | A phagocytophilum |
| Vector | Amblyomma americanum (Lone Star tick) | Ixodes scapularis (black-legged tick), Ixodes pacificus (Western black-legged tick) in California, Ixodes ricinus in Europe, and probably Ixodes persulcatus in parts of Asia |
| Location | Southeastern and south-central United States | Wisconsin and Minnesota, less active in New York and Connecticut, also California |
| Rash | 30% of adults, 60% of children | Rare |
| Prognosis | ~3% mortality | < 1% mortality |

