eMedicine Specialties > Infectious Diseases > Bone and Joint Infections

Septic Arthritis: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: John L Brusch, MD, FACP, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine and Infectious Disease Service, Cambridge Health Alliance
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 25, 2008

Differential Diagnoses

Other Problems to Be Considered

Primary rheumatological disorders - Vasculitis, crystalline arthritides
Drug-induced arthritis
Reactive arthritis - Postinfectious diarrhea syndrome, postmeningococcal and postgonococcal arthritis, arthritis of intrinsic bowel disease12

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • Normal joint fluid is clear and colorless and produces a stringlike structure when ejected from a syringe, indicating normal viscosity. Infected joint fluid is typically yellow-green due to elevated levels of nucleated cells. An evaluation of the synovial fluid (ie, via leukocyte count, appearance on Gram stain, polarizing microscopy examination, culture) is the most rewarding approach in assessing a potentially infected joint. Additional stains and/or cultures should be obtained depending on the differential diagnoses considered.7,16
  • Culture of the synovial fluid or of synovial tissue itself is the only definitive method of diagnosing septic arthritis. Culture results in patients with nongonococcal septic arthritis are almost always positive unless the patient has received antibiotics prior to the joint aspiration. Cultures of the joint fluid in gonococcal infections yield positive results in only about 25% of cases. The effectiveness of standard culture techniques is much more limited in patients with PJI.
  • Therapeutic decisions cannot be delayed until results of the culture are available. An approach to rapid evaluation of an acutely inflamed joint is to screen the fluid for crystals via polarizing microscopy and for organisms via Gram stain (63-96% sensitive). If crystals are present and the Gram stain findings are negative, treatment for crystal-associated arthritis should be initiated. However, an exception to this would be the presence of significant risk factors for infection (eg, the focus of infection lies somewhere that could lead to bacteremia, such as pneumonia or pyelonephritis).
  • If microscopy demonstrates no crystals, treat the patient for presumed infection even if the Gram stain findings are negative. The Gram stain is less than 60% sensitive for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. Always send the fluid for culture, regardless of the result of the screening evaluation. A joint damaged by gout or pseudogout is prone to be infected. Culture of synovial tissue is indicated primarily to detect mycobacteria or fungi.
  • If the patient's condition does not improve significantly after 5 days, the joint must be reaspirated and examined. Most septic joints have a WBC count that exceeds 50,000/μL, with more than 75% polymorphonuclear leukocytes. However, various sterile inflammatory processes may exhibit the same cellular profile.
  • Findings from examination of the synovial fluid in Lyme arthritis are similar to those found in infection caused by any other type of bacterium. Positive serology results (ie, antibody measurements, Western blot, polymerase chain reaction [PCR] for Lyme disease) do not establish the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. A positive result on any of these tests simply indicates that the patient has encountered B burgdorferi; a positive result does not necessarily establish a connection between the patient's musculoskeletal symptoms and Lyme disease.
  • Alterations in the glucose and protein concentration of the synovial fluid are nonspecific; these should not be measured routinely.
  • Obtain at least 2 sets of blood cultures to rule out a bacteremic origin of the septic joint.
  • In the setting of possible gonococcal infection, obtaining cultures from the patient's rectum, cervix, urethra, and pharynx and from any skin lesions is most helpful. Immediate plating of the joint fluid directly onto appropriate media and/or rapid delivery of the specimen to the laboratory for appropriate plating and culturing are of benefit in improving the relatively low yield.17
  • PCR holds promise for detection of bacterial DNA in joint fluid and synovial tissue. PCR has led to diagnosis of infective arthritis due to Yersinia species, B burgdorferi, Chlamydia species, N gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma species. Caveats concerning this approach are raised because it cannot be used to distinguish between live and dead organisms and it is susceptible to contamination. PCR also techniques hold some promise in detecting pathogens in patients who have recently received antibiotics. Unfortunately, many patients receive empirically administered antibiotics prior to the collection of synovial fluid.
  • Silver stains can be used to detect organisms in 5% of cases of Lyme arthritis.
  • Evaluation of a possibly infected prosthetic joint is similar to that of a natural joint.1,18 The presence of leukocytes in the aspirated fluid is variable. Because many of the potential pathogens are also classic contaminating organisms (eg, CONS, Propionibacterium species, Corynebacterium species), repeat aspirates are often required to confirm the diagnosis. The use of multiple types of media with prolonged incubation times may increase both the sensitivity and specificity of the culture in PJI. The sensitivity of periprosthetic-tissue culture ranges from 65-94%.15 Material from fistulous tracts is associated with a high rate of contamination and is probably best avoided.
  • At times, imaging studies may be required to determine the significance of a given culture (see Imaging Studies).
  • The synovial fluid of reactive arthritis demonstrates few signs of inflammation. PCR may reveal DNA of the purported causative organism.
  • The synovial fluid of a joint infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows marked leukocytosis. Findings on acid-fast stains are usually negative. Culture results are positive in 80% of cases. Culture results of synovial biopsies are positive in 94% of specimens.
  • The fluid of an infected bursa closely resembles that of a bacterial joint infection.13
  • An elevated sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein is useful in following response to therapy, as well as in detecting an acute process in chronically affected joints.
  • Measurement of serum uric acid levels cannot be used to establish or negate the diagnosis of uric acid arthropathy. Values may range widely during an acute attack.
  • Appropriate serological tests for the diagnosis of various vasculitides or rheumatological disorders are often indicated.19

Imaging Studies

  • Plain radiography is of limited value in evaluating a joint for infection.14
    • Periarticular soft-tissue swelling is the most common finding. Radiography is most useful in ruling out underlying osteomyelitis or periarticular osteomyelitis caused by the joint infection itself.
    • Plain radiography can reveal the linear deposition of calcium pyrophosphate. The radiographic findings of reactive arthritis are usually limited to those of soft-tissue swelling. Periarticular osteoporosis may be detected.
  • Ultrasonography may be used to diagnose effusions in chronically distorted joints (secondary to trauma or rheumatoid arthritis).
  • CT scans and MRIs are more sensitive for distinguishing osteomyelitis, periarticular abscesses, and joint effusions. The information gained usually does not justify the increased cost; however, these tests are most helpful in patients with sacroiliac or sternoclavicular joint infection to rule out extension into the mediastinum or pelvis. MRI is preferred because of its greater ability to image soft tissue.
  • Radionuclide scans (ie, technetium Tc 99m, gallium Ga 67, indium In 111 leukocyte scans) are used to nonspecifically localize areas of inflammation. They cannot be used to distinguish infectious from sterile processes. However, they may be of use in diagnosing septic arthritis in relatively sequestered areas, such as the hip and sacroiliac joints.
  • In PJI, plain radiography can reveal new subperiosteal bone growth and transcortical sinus tracts.1 These findings are specific for infection. Arthrography can demonstrate loosening of the prosthesis and abscesses. Nuclear scans of all types are of limited diagnostic use in patients with PJI. CT scans are useful in ascertaining the state of the surrounding soft tissue. MRIs are limited by the type of implanted material. This diagnostic modality can safely image only titanium or tantalum devices.

Other Tests

Sonication of removed prosthetic material appears to increase the sensitivity of culture, especially in patients who have received antibiotics prior to surgery. 

Procedures

  • Always perform joint aspiration under the most sterile conditions possible to prevent the introduction of infection.
  • Obtaining a biopsy of the synovium may be necessary to diagnose one of the many causes (ie, mycobacterial, fungal) of granulomatous synovitis.

Histologic Findings

Examining the synovium histologically often establishes a diagnosis of fungal or mycobacterial joint infections.

More on Septic Arthritis

Overview: Septic Arthritis
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Septic Arthritis
Treatment & Medication: Septic Arthritis
Follow-up: Septic Arthritis
References

References

  1. Ross JJ, Shamsuddin H. Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: review of 180 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). May 2004;83(3):139-48. [Medline].

  2. Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, et al. Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis. Nov 1 2007;45(9):1113-9. [Medline].

  3. Cucurull E, Espinoza LR. Gonococcal arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. May 1998;24(2):305-22. [Medline].

  4. Goldenberg DL, Cohen AS. Acute infectious arthritis. A review of patients with nongonococcal joint infections (with emphasis on therapy and prognosis). Am J Med. Mar 1976;60(3):369-77. [Medline].

  5. Broy SB, Schmid FR. A comparison of medical drainage (needle aspiration) and surgical drainage (arthrotomy or arthroscopy) in the initial treatment of infected joints. Clin Rheum Dis. Aug 1986;12(2):501-22. [Medline].

  6. McGuire NM, Kauffman CA. Septic arthritis in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. Mar 1985;33(3):170-4. [Medline].

  7. Smith JW, Piercy EA. Infectious arthritis. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1995;20(2):225-30; quiz 231. [Medline].

  8. Baraboutis I, Skoutelis A. Streptococcus pneumoniae septic arthritis in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. Dec 2004;10(12):1037-9. [Medline].

  9. Raad J, Peacock JE Jr. Septic arthritis in the adult caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: a report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Oct 2004;34(2):559-69. [Medline].

  10. [Best Evidence] Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, Bent S. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis?. JAMA. Apr 4 2007;297(13):1478-88. [Medline].

  11. Rice PA. Gonococcal arthritis (disseminated gonococcal infection). Infect Dis Clin North Am. Dec 2005;19(4):853-61. [Medline].

  12. Manadan AM, Block JA. Daily needle aspiration versus surgical lavage for the treatment of bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Am J Ther. Sep-Oct 2004;11(5):412-5. [Medline].

  13. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. Oct 14 2004;351(16):1645-54. [Medline].

  14. Kaandorp CJ, Krijnen P, Moens HJ, et al. The outcome of bacterial arthritis: a prospective community-based study. Arthritis Rheum. May 1997;40(5):884-92. [Medline].

  15. Zimmermann B 3rd, Mikolich DJ, Ho G Jr. Septic bursitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Jun 1995;24(6):391-410. [Medline].

  16. Wilson ML, Winn W. Laboratory diagnosis of bone, joint, soft-tissue, and skin infections. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2008;46(3):453-7. [Medline].

  17. Wise CM, Morris CR, Wasilauskas BL, et al. Gonococcal arthritis in an era of increasing penicillin resistance. Presentations and outcomes in 41 recent cases (1985-1991). Arch Intern Med. Dec 12-26 1994;154(23):2690-5. [Medline].

  18. Goldenberg DL. Septic arthritis and other infections of rheumatological significance. Rheum Clin NA. 1991;17:149. [Medline].

  19. Garcia-De La Torre I. Advances in the management of septic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Feb 2003;29(1):61-75. [Medline].

  20. Koeppe J, Johnson S, Morroni J, Siracusa-Rick C, Armon, C. Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy for Retained Infected Prosthetic Joints: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice. July 2008;16(4):224-9.

  21. Kaandorp CJ, Dinant HJ, van de Laar MA, et al. Incidence and sources of native and prosthetic joint infection: a community based prospective survey. Ann Rheum Dis. Aug 1997;56(8):470-5. [Medline].

  22. Aliabadi P, Nikpoor N. Imaging osteomyelitis. Arthritis Rheum. May 1994;37(5):617-22. [Medline].

  23. Ince A, Rupp J, Frommelt L, et al. Is "aseptic" loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection?. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1 2004;39(11):1599-603. [Medline].

  24. Rosenthal J, Bole GG, Robinson WD. Acute nongonococcal infectious arthritis. Evaluation of risk factors, therapy, and outcome. Arthritis Rheum. Aug 1980;23(8):889-97. [Medline].

  25. Steere AC, Sikand VK. The presenting manifestations of Lyme disease and the outcomes of treatment. N Engl J Med. Jun 12 2003;348(24):2472-4. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

septic arthritis, infectious arthritis, infective arthritis, suppurative arthritis, reactive arthritis, inflammatory arthritis, bacterial septic arthritides, acute bacterial arthritis, bacterial septic arthritis, bacterial arthritis, viral arthritis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, N gonorrhoeae, Staphylococcus aureus, S aureus, Streptococcus viridans, S viridans, Streptococcus pneumoniae, S pneumoniae, group B streptococci, crystalline arthritis, Lyme disease, Lyme arthritis, prosthetic joint infections, PJI, rheumatoid arthritis

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

John L Brusch, MD, FACP, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine and Infectious Disease Service, Cambridge Health Alliance
John L Brusch, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and Infectious Diseases Society of America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Maria D Mileno, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Brown University
Maria D Mileno, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Society of Travel Medicine, and Sigma Xi
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Aaron Glatt, MD, Professor of Clinical Medicine, New York Medical College; President and CEO, Former Chief Medical Officer, Departments of Medicine and Infectious Diseases, New Island Hospital
Aaron Glatt, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, American Thoracic Society, American Venereal Disease Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International AIDS Society, and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD, Clinical and Research Fellow, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital
Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Society for Microbiology, and Infectious Diseases Society of America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Burke A Cunha, MD, Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital
Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and Infectious Diseases Society of America
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.