Septic Arthritis Workup

  • Author: John L Brusch, MD, FACP; Chief Editor: Burke A Cunha, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 18, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

An approach to rapid evaluation of an acutely inflamed joint is to screen the synovial fluid for crystals via polarizing microscopy and for organisms via Gram stain (63-96% sensitive). If crystals are present and the Gram stain findings are negative, treatment for crystal-associated arthritis should be initiated. However, an exception to this would be the presence of significant risk factors for infection (eg, the focus of infection lies somewhere that could lead to bacteremia, such as pneumonia or pyelonephritis). Therapeutic decisions cannot be delayed until results of the synovial fluid culture are available.

If microscopy demonstrates no crystals, treat the patient for presumed infection even if the Gram stain findings are negative. The Gram stain is less than 60% sensitive for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. Always send the fluid for culture, regardless of the result of the screening evaluation. A joint damaged by gout or pseudogout is prone to be infected. Culture of synovial tissue is indicated primarily to detect mycobacteria or fungi.

If the patient's condition does not improve significantly after 5 days, the joint must be reaspirated and examined. Most septic joints have a white blood cell (WBC) count that exceeds 50,000/μL, with more than 75% polymorphonuclear leukocytes. However, various sterile inflammatory processes may exhibit the same cellular profile.

Other considerations

The fluid of an infected bursa closely resembles that of a bacterial joint infection.[15]

An elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) is useful in following response to therapy, as well as in detecting an acute process in chronically affected joints.

Measurement of serum uric acid levels cannot be used to establish or negate the diagnosis of uric acid arthropathy. Values may range widely during an acute attack.

Appropriate serologic tests for the diagnosis of various vasculitides or rheumatologic disorders are often indicated.[19]

Obtaining a biopsy of the synovium may be necessary to diagnose one of the many causes (ie, mycobacterial, fungal) of granulomatous synovitis. Examining the synovium histologically often establishes a diagnosis of fungal or mycobacterial joint infections.

Next

Joint Fluid Analysis and Culture

Always perform joint aspiration under the most sterile conditions possible to prevent the introduction of infection.

Normal joint fluid is clear and colorless and produces a stringlike structure when ejected from a syringe, indicating normal viscosity. Infected joint fluid is typically yellow-green due to elevated levels of nucleated cells. An evaluation of the synovial fluid (ie, via leukocyte count, appearance on Gram stain, polarizing microscopy examination, culture) is the most rewarding approach in assessing a potentially infected joint. Additional stains and/or cultures should be obtained depending on the differential diagnosis considered.[8, 20] Alterations in the glucose and protein concentration of the synovial fluid are nonspecific; these should not be measured routinely.

Culture of the synovial fluid or of synovial tissue itself is the only definitive method of diagnosing septic arthritis. Culture results in patients with nongonococcal septic arthritis are almost always positive, unless the patient has received antibiotics before the joint aspiration. Cultures of the joint fluid in gonococcal infections yield positive results in only about 25% of cases. The effectiveness of standard culture techniques is much more limited in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI). If possible stopping antibiotics for 4 days and holding cultures for 14 days may increase the yield.[21]

In addition, sonication of removed prosthetic material appears to increase the sensitivity of culture, especially in patients who have received antibiotics before surgery.

Lyme disease

Findings from examination of the synovial fluid in Lyme arthritis are similar to those found in infection caused by any other type of bacterium. Positive serology results (ie, antibody measurements, Western blot, polymerase chain reaction [PCR] for Lyme disease) do not establish the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. A positive result on any of these tests simply indicates that the patient has encountered B burgdorferi; a positive result does not necessarily establish a connection between the patient's musculoskeletal symptoms and Lyme disease.

Silver stains can be used to detect organisms in 5% of cases of Lyme arthritis.

Prosthetic joint infection

Evaluation of a possibly infected prosthetic joint is similar to that of a natural joint.[2, 22] The presence of leukocytes in the aspirated fluid is variable. Because many of the potential pathogens are also classic contaminating organisms (eg, coagulase-negative S aureus [CONS], Propionibacterium species, Corynebacterium species), repeat aspirates are often required to confirm the diagnosis. The use of multiple types of media with prolonged incubation times may increase both the sensitivity and specificity of the culture in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The sensitivity of periprosthetic-tissue culture ranges from 65% to 94%.[18] Material from fistulous tracts is associated with a high rate of contamination and is probably best avoided.

Reactive and tuberculous arthritides

The synovial fluid of reactive arthritis demonstrates few signs of inflammation. PCR may reveal the DNA of the purported causative organism.

The synovial fluid of a joint infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis shows marked leukocytosis. Although findings on acid-fast stains are usually negative, culture results are positive in 80% of cases. Culture results of synovial biopsies are positive in 94% of specimens.

Previous
Next

Blood and Other Cultures

Obtain at least 2 sets of blood cultures to rule out a bacteremic origin of the septic joint.

In the setting of possible gonococcal infection, obtaining cultures from the patient's rectum, cervix, urethra, and pharynx and from any skin lesions is most helpful. Immediate plating of the joint fluid directly onto appropriate media and/or rapid delivery of the specimen to the laboratory for appropriate plating and culturing are of benefit in improving the relatively low yield.[23]

Previous
Next

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) holds promise for detection of bacterial DNA in joint fluid and synovial tissue. PCR has led to diagnosis of infective arthritis due to Yersinia species, B burgdorferi, Chlamydia species, N gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma species. However, caveats concerning this approach are raised, because it cannot be used to distinguish between live and dead organisms and it is susceptible to contamination.

PCR also techniques hold some promise in detecting pathogens in patients who have recently received antibiotics. Unfortunately, many patients receive empirically administered antibiotics before the collection of synovial fluid.

Previous
Next

Radiologic Studies

At times, imaging studies may be required to determine the significance of a given culture.

Radiography and ultrasonography

Plain radiography is of limited value in evaluating a joint for infection[17] ; periarticular soft-tissue swelling is the most common finding. This imaging modality is most useful in ruling out underlying osteomyelitis or periarticular osteomyelitis caused by the joint infection itself.

In addition, plain radiography can reveal the linear deposition of calcium pyrophosphate. The radiographic findings of reactive arthritis are usually limited to those of soft-tissue swelling. Periarticular osteoporosis may be detected.

Ultrasonography may be used to diagnose effusions in chronically distorted joints (secondary to trauma or rheumatoid arthritis).

CT scanning, MRI, and radionuclide scanning

Computed tomography (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are more sensitive for distinguishing osteomyelitis, periarticular abscesses, and joint effusions. The information gained usually does not justify the increased cost; however, these tests are most helpful in patients with sacroiliac or sternoclavicular joint infection to rule out extension into the mediastinum or pelvis. MRI is preferred because of its greater ability to image soft tissue.

Radionuclide scans (ie, technetium-99m [99m Tc], gallium-67 [67 Ga], indium-111 [111 In] leukocyte scans) are used to nonspecifically localize areas of inflammation. They cannot be used to distinguish infectious from sterile processes. However, radionuclide scans may be of use in diagnosing septic arthritis in relatively sequestered areas, such as the hip and sacroiliac joints.

Imaging in prosthetic joint infection

In prosthetic joint infection [PJI], plain radiography can reveal new subperiosteal bone growth and transcortical sinus tracts.[2] These findings are specific for infection. Arthrography can demonstrate loosening of the prosthesis and abscesses. Nuclear scans of all types are of limited diagnostic use in patients with prosthetic joint infection, and MRIs are limited by the type of implanted material (this diagnostic modality can safely image only titanium or tantalum devices). However, CT scans are useful in ascertaining the state of the surrounding soft tissue.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

John L Brusch, MD, FACP  Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Consulting Staff, Department of Medicine and Infectious Disease Service, Cambridge Health Alliance

John L Brusch, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Maria D Mileno, MD  Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Maria D Mileno, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Society of Travel Medicine, and Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Aaron Glatt, MD  Professor of Clinical Medicine, New York Medical College; President and CEO, Former Chief Medical Officer, Departments of Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St Joseph Hospital (formerly New Island Hospital)

Aaron Glatt, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, American Thoracic Society, American Venereal Disease Association, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International AIDS Society, and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Burke A Cunha, MD  Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital

Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Goldenberg DL, Cohen AS. Acute infectious arthritis. A review of patients with nongonococcal joint infections (with emphasis on therapy and prognosis). Am J Med. Mar 1976;60(3):369-77. [Medline].

  2. Ross JJ, Shamsuddin H. Sternoclavicular septic arthritis: review of 180 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). May 2004;83(3):139-48. [Medline].

  3. Del Pozo JL, Patel R. Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med. Aug 20 2009;361(8):787-94. [Medline].

  4. Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, et al. Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis. Nov 1 2007;45(9):1113-9. [Medline].

  5. Cucurull E, Espinoza LR. Gonococcal arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. May 1998;24(2):305-22. [Medline].

  6. Broy SB, Schmid FR. A comparison of medical drainage (needle aspiration) and surgical drainage (arthrotomy or arthroscopy) in the initial treatment of infected joints. Clin Rheum Dis. Aug 1986;12(2):501-22. [Medline].

  7. McGuire NM, Kauffman CA. Septic arthritis in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. Mar 1985;33(3):170-4. [Medline].

  8. Smith JW, Piercy EA. Infectious arthritis. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1995;20(2):225-30; quiz 231. [Medline].

  9. Baraboutis I, Skoutelis A. Streptococcus pneumoniae septic arthritis in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. Dec 2004;10(12):1037-9. [Medline].

  10. Raad J, Peacock JE Jr. Septic arthritis in the adult caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: a report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Oct 2004;34(2):559-69. [Medline].

  11. Corvec S, Illiaquer M, Touchais S, et al. Clinical features of group B Streptococcus prosthetic joint infections and molecular characterization of isolates. J Clin Microbiol. Jan 2011;49(1):380-2. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  12. [Best Evidence] Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, Bent S. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis?. JAMA. Apr 4 2007;297(13):1478-88. [Medline].

  13. Rice PA. Gonococcal arthritis (disseminated gonococcal infection). Infect Dis Clin North Am. Dec 2005;19(4):853-61. [Medline].

  14. Manadan AM, Block JA. Daily needle aspiration versus surgical lavage for the treatment of bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Am J Ther. Sep-Oct 2004;11(5):412-5. [Medline].

  15. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. Oct 14 2004;351(16):1645-54. [Medline].

  16. Hsieh PH, Lee MS, Hsu KY, Chang YH, Shih HN, Ueng SW. Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: risk factors and outcome of treatment. Clin Infect Dis. Oct 1 2009;49(7):1036-43. [Medline].

  17. Kaandorp CJ, Krijnen P, Moens HJ, et al. The outcome of bacterial arthritis: a prospective community-based study. Arthritis Rheum. May 1997;40(5):884-92. [Medline].

  18. Zimmermann B 3rd, Mikolich DJ, Ho G Jr. Septic bursitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. Jun 1995;24(6):391-410. [Medline].

  19. Garcia-De La Torre I. Advances in the management of septic arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. Feb 2003;29(1):61-75. [Medline].

  20. Wilson ML, Winn W. Laboratory diagnosis of bone, joint, soft-tissue, and skin infections. Clin Infect Dis. Feb 1 2008;46(3):453-7. [Medline].

  21. Schäfer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L. Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis. Dec 1 2008;47(11):1403-9. [Medline].

  22. Goldenberg DL. Septic arthritis and other infections of rheumatological significance. Rheum Clin NA. 1991;17:149. [Medline].

  23. Wise CM, Morris CR, Wasilauskas BL, et al. Gonococcal arthritis in an era of increasing penicillin resistance. Presentations and outcomes in 41 recent cases (1985-1991). Arch Intern Med. Dec 12-26 1994;154(23):2690-5. [Medline].

  24. Kaandorp CJ, Dinant HJ, van de Laar MA, et al. Incidence and sources of native and prosthetic joint infection: a community based prospective survey. Ann Rheum Dis. Aug 1997;56(8):470-5. [Medline].

  25. Koeppe J, Johnson S, Morroni J, Siracusa-Rick C, Armon C. Suppressive antibiotic therapy for retained infected prosthetic joints: case series and review of the literature. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2008;16(4):224-9. [Full Text].

  26. Martínez-Pastor JC, Muñoz-Mahamud E, Vilchez F, García-Ramiro S, Bori G, Sierra J, et al. Outcome of acute prosthetic joint infections due to gram-negative bacilli treated with open debridement and retention of the prosthesis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov 2009;53(11):4772-7. [Medline].

  27. Berbari EF, Osmon DR, Carr A, et al. Dental procedures as risk factors for prosthetic hip or knee infection: a hospital-based prospective case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 1 2010;50(1):8-16. [Medline].

  28. Suprax [package insert]. Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Baltimore, Md; 2008. [Full Text].

  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Availability of cefixime 400 mg tablets--United States, April 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Apr 25 2008;57(16):435. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Table 1. Clinical Features of Viral Septic Arthritis
VirusClinical Features of Viral Septic Arthritis
Parvovirus B19Occurs in adult women with erythema infectiosum, often an itchy rash
Hepatitis AMuscle aches and rash in 10% of cases
Hepatitis BOnset in the preicteric phase; usually resolves as jaundice develops; chronic arthritis possible in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection
Hepatitis CHistory similar to hepatitis B joint infection
Rubella (natural infection and vaccine related)Onset is possible before, during, or after the appearance of the rash; usually resolves in a few weeks; may recur and, more commonly, may persist
Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] (2 types occur, both with noninflammatory, sterile joint fluid)Develops over several days, and severe knee or ankle pain is characteristic; excellent response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS)
Sudden onset of severe pain in the shoulders and elbows, closely resembling an acute gouty attack; Opiates often necessary to control pain
MumpsOccurs in adult men 2 weeks after the presentation of parotitis
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.