Diabetic Foot Infections Workup

  • Author: Michael Stuart Bronze, MD; Chief Editor: Michael Stuart Bronze, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jul 27, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

The patient’s complete blood count (CBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) vary according to the type of diabetic foot infection.[6] Gram stain and cultures can aid in determining the etiology of infection in skin and soft-tissue infections, while in acute osteomyelitis and cellulitis, blood cultures can help to identify causative organisms. In chronic osteomyelitis, bone biopsy can be used to find the infecting microbe.

Imaging studies do not play a role in the diagnosis of cellulitis, but they are a valuable tool in the assessment of the other infection types.

Next

Cellulitis

The complete blood count (CBC) count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are slightly or moderately elevated in cellulitis. However, the elevations are not diagnostic and, therefore, are unhelpful. Blood culture results are usually negative; if positive, they usually indicate the presence of group A or group B streptococci. Cultures of skin via aspiration or biopsy are generally unrewarding.

Imaging studies are not applicable in cellulitis.

Previous
Next

Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections

The CBC and ESR are mildly or moderately elevated in these tissue infections. If bullae are present, Gram stain and culture results from aspirated exudate from a bullous lesion may provide clues to the etiology of the infection. Blood culture results may be positive.

In a patient with diabetes considered to have a deep soft-tissue infection, plain radiography, computed tomography (CT) scanning, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be performed to rule out a compartment syndrome, which may present as extreme pain and tenderness of the affected limb, and to demonstrate the presence of gas or a foreign body in the deep tissues.[7] A finding of excessive gas signifies a mixed aerobic-anaerobic infection, in contrast to gas gangrene (clostridial myonecrosis).

Aspiration of a sample from the leading edge of the erythematous border in a patient with cellulitis is usually not necessary, but a sample may be aspirated if the likely organism must be identified on initial presentation. However, the yield is low, likely to be less than 5%.

Samples from deep-skin and soft-tissue infections may be aspirated. Gram stains and/or cultures may be used to identify the organism.

Previous
Next

Acute Osteomyelitis

The CBC usually reveals leukocytosis, and the ESR is moderately or highly elevated, in acute osteomyelitis.[6] Blood culture results are usually negative; when positive, the findings most frequently indicate the presence of S aureus.

For affected long bones, plain radiographic findings generally become abnormal after 10-14 days. Soft-tissue swelling and periosteal elevation are the earliest signs of acute osteomyelitis on a plain radiograph. Bone scans are preferred to gallium or indium scans in the assessment of acute osteomyelitis, as the latter imaging studies offer no additional information, and the findings are not more specific than those of bone scans. In addition, indium scans often show false-negative results in acute or chronic osteomyelitis. Bone-scan findings are positive within 24 hours.

Bone biopsy is not necessary in acute osteomyelitis, because the pathogens are predictable.

Previous
Next

Chronic Osteomyelitis

In chronic osteomyelitis, the CBC is often within the reference range. Usually, the ESR is very highly elevated and may exceed 100 mm/h.[6] The platelet count is also often elevated in chronic osteomyelitis. Blood culture results are usually negative.

When osteomyelitis becomes chronic, plain radiographic findings are invariably abnormal, as shown in the image below.

Chronic diabetic ulceration with underlying osteomChronic diabetic ulceration with underlying osteomyelitis. Plain film radiograph exhibiting cortical disruption at the medial aspect of the first MTP joint.

Bone scans are usually unnecessary unless diagnostic confusion exists with another disorder, as when a bone tumor must be differentiated from chronic osteomyelitis before definitive bone biopsy. An MRI would also be helpful in such a situation.

Bone biopsy performed under aseptic conditions in the operating room is the preferred way to identify the causative pathogen in chronic osteomyelitis. P aeruginosa is usually not the causative organism; however, B fragilis is an important bone pathogen in chronic osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes, as are E coli, P mirabilis, and K pneumoniae.

Because surgical debridement is critical in treating chronic osteomyelitis, bone biopsy specimens are usually not obtained during the surgical debridement procedure.

Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Subperiosteal elevation and/or infection may involve the cortex in acute osteomyelitis. Involucrum and/or sequestrum may be present in the cortical bone in cases of chronic osteomyelitis.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD  Professor, Stewart G Wolf Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Oklahoma State Medical Association, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Burke A Cunha, MD  Professor of Medicine, State University of New York School of Medicine at Stony Brook; Chief, Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital

Burke A Cunha, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, and Infectious Diseases Society of America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Charles S Levy, MD  Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Disease, George Washington University School of Medicine

Charles S Levy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Medical Society of the District of Columbia

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Richard B Brown, MD, FACP  Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baystate Medical Center; Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine

Richard B Brown, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Massachusetts Medical Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD  Professor, Stewart G Wolf Chair in Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center

Michael Stuart Bronze, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, Association of Professors of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Oklahoma State Medical Association, and Southern Society for Clinical Investigation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Lipsky BA, Armstrong DG, Citron DM, Tice AD, Morgenstern DE, Abramson MA. Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for diabetic foot infections (SIDESTEP): prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, multicentre trial. Lancet. Nov 12 2005;366(9498):1695-703. [Medline].

  2. Lipsky BA, Giordano P, Choudhri S, Song J. Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate. J Antimicrob Chemother. Aug 2007;60(2):370-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. Lipsky BA, Stoutenburgh U. Daptomycin for treating infected diabetic foot ulcers: evidence from a randomized, controlled trial comparing daptomycin with vancomycin or semi-synthetic penicillins for complicated skin and skin-structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. Feb 2005;55(2):240-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Stein GE, Schooley S, Peloquin CA, Missavage A, Havlichek DH. Linezolid tissue penetration and serum activity against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in diabetic patients with foot infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. Oct 2007;60(4):819-23. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  5. Wang S, Cunha BA, Hamid NS, Amato BM, Feuerman M, Malone B. Metronidazole single versus multiple daily dosing in serious intraabdominal/pelvic and diabetic foot infections. J Chemother. Aug 2007;19(4):410-6. [Medline].

  6. Malabu UH, Al-Rubeaan KA, Al-Derewish M. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: usefulness of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in its diagnosis. West Afr J Med. Apr-Jun 2007;26(2):113-6. [Medline].

  7. Tan PL, Teh J. MRI of the diabetic foot: differentiation of infection from neuropathic change. Br J Radiol. Nov 2007;80(959):939-48. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Serious CNS reactions possible when linezolid (Zyvox®) is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm265305.htm. Accessed July 27, 2011.

Previous
Next
 
Chronic diabetic ulceration with underlying osteomyelitis. Plain film radiograph exhibiting cortical disruption at the medial aspect of the first MTP joint.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.