Azotemia 

  • Author: Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP; Chief Editor: Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN   more...
 
Updated: Dec 1, 2010
 

Background

Azotemia is an elevation of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (reference range, 8-20 mg/dL) and serum creatinine (normal value, 0.7-1.4 mg/dL) levels, as depicted in the following graph.

The graph shows the relationship of the glomerularThe graph shows the relationship of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to steady-state serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. As shown in this figure, in early renal disease, substantial decline in GFR may lead to only a slight elevation in serum creatinine. Elevation in serum creatinine is apparent only when the GFR falls to about 70 mL/min.

Each human kidney contains approximately 1 million functional units, called nephrons, which are primarily involved in urine formation. Urine formation ensures that the body eliminates the final products of metabolic activities and excess water in an attempt to maintain a constant internal environment (homeostasis).

Urine formation by each nephron involves 3 main processes, as follows: filtration at the glomerular level, selective reabsorption from the filtrate passing along the renal tubules, and secretion by the cells of the tubules into this filtrate. Perturbation of any of these processes impairs the kidney's excretory function, resulting in azotemia.

The quantity of glomerular filtrate produced each minute by all nephrons in both kidneys is referred to as the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Average GFR is about 125 mL/min (10% less for women) or 180 L/d. About 99% (178 L/d) is reabsorbed, and the rest (2 L/d) is excreted.

Measuring renal function

Radionuclide assessment of GFR is the criterion standard for measuring kidney function. However, because it is expensive and not widely available, serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance (CrCl) more commonly are used to estimate GFR.

An inverse relationship between serum creatinine and GFR exists. However, the serum creatinine and CrCl are not sensitive measures of kidney damage for 2 reasons. First, substantial renal damage can take place before any decrease in GFR occurs. Second, substantial decline in GFR may lead to only slight elevation in serum creatinine, as seen in the image above. An elevation in serum creatinine is apparent only when the GFR falls to about 60-70 mL/min. This is due to compensatory hypertrophy and hyperfiltration of the remaining healthy nephrons.

Because creatinine normally is filtered as well as secreted into the renal tubules, the CrCl may cause the GFR to be substantially overestimated, especially as kidney failure progresses because of maximal tubular excretion. More accurate determinations of GFR require the use of inulin clearance or a radiolabeled compound, such as iothalamate. In practice, precise knowledge of the GFR is not required, and disease process usually can be monitored by the estimated GFR (eGFR) using different methods, as shown below.

The CrCl is best calculated by obtaining a 24-hour collection for creatinine and volume and then using the following formula: CrCl (mL/min) = U/P X V where U is the 24-hour creatinine in mg/dL, P is the serum creatinine in mg/dL, and V is the 24-hour volume/1440 (number of min in 24 h). Using the 24-hour creatinine in grams and the serum creatinine in milligrams, CrCl (mL/min) = creatinine [g/d]/serum creatinine [mg/dL]) X 70. An adequate 24-hour collection usually reflects a creatinine generation of 15-20 mg/kg in women and 20-25 mg/kg in men. When 24-hour creatinine is measured, the adequacy of the collection must be established prior to calculation of the creatinine clearance.

Alternatively, a bedside formula (Cockroft and Gault) using the patient's serum creatinine, age, and lean weight (in kg) can be used to estimate the GFR, as follows: CrCl (mL/min) = (140 - age) X weight (kg) / (72 X serum creatinine) in mg/dL (X 0.85 for women).

Another formula was derived from data collected in a large study called the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). This formula is known as the MDRD formula, or the Levey formula. It is now widely accepted as more accurate than the Cockroft and Gault formula and is an alternative to radioisotope clearance. Because serum creatinine levels alone cannot detect earlier stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the MDRD formula also takes into account the patient's age and race. Although more accurate, it is much more difficult to calculate manually. However, software for estimating GFR by the MDRD formula is available for most pocket digital assistants (PDA) and can be found on the Internet.

Delanaye et al have argued that the MDRD formula is not applicable to all persons, such as healthy individuals and patients who are anorectic or obese.[1] It has therefore been argued that the formula should be applied with caution.

Next

Pathophysiology

There are 3 pathophysiologic states in azotemia, as follows: prerenal azotemia, intrarenal azotemia, and postrenal azotemia.

Prerenal azotemia

Prerenal azotemia refers to elevation in BUN and creatinine levels because of problems in the systemic circulation that decrease flow to the kidneys. In prerenal azotemia, decrease in renal flow stimulates salt and water retention to restore volume and pressure. When volume or pressure is decreased, the baroreceptor reflexes located in the aortic arch and carotid sinuses are activated. This leads to sympathetic nerve activation, resulting in renal afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and renin secretion through β 1 -receptors. Constriction of the afferent arterioles causes a decrease in the intraglomerular pressure, reducing GFR proportionally. Renin converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II, which, in turn, stimulates aldosterone release. Increased aldosterone levels results in salt and water absorption in the distal collecting tubule.

A decrease in volume or pressure is a nonosmotic stimulus for antidiuretic hormone production in the hypothalamus, which exerts its effect in the medullary collecting duct for water reabsorption. Through unknown mechanisms, activation of the sympathetic nervous system leads to enhanced proximal tubular reabsorption of salt and water, as well as BUN, creatinine, calcium, uric acid, and bicarbonate. The net result of these 4 mechanisms of salt and water retention is decreased output and decreased urinary excretion of sodium (< 20 mEq/L).

Intrarenal azotemia

Intrarenal azotemia, also known as acute renal failure (ARF), renal-renal azotemia, and acute kidney injury (AKI), refers to elevation in BUN and creatinine levels because of problems in the kidney itself. There are several definitions, including a rise in serum creatinine levels of about 30% from baseline or a sudden decline in output below 500 mL/d. If output is preserved, it is called nonoliguric ARF. If output falls below 500 mL/d, it is called oliguric ARF. Any form of ARF may be so severe to virtually stop formation, a condition called anuria (< 100 mL/d).

The most common causes of nonoliguric ARF are acute tubular necrosis (ATN), aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity, lithium toxicity, or cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Tubular damage is less severe than in oliguric ARF. Normal output in nonoliguric ARF does not reflect normal GFR. Patients may still make 1440 mL/d of urine even when the GFR falls to about 1 mL/min because of decreased tubular reabsorption.

Some studies indicate that nonoliguric forms of ARF are associated with less morbidity and mortality than oliguric ARF. Uncontrolled studies also suggest that volume expansion, potent diuretic agents, and renal vasodilators can convert oliguric to nonoliguric ARF if administered early.

The pathophysiology of acute oliguric or nonoliguric ARF depends on the anatomical location of the injury. In ATN, epithelial damage leads to functional decline in the ability of the tubules to reabsorb salt, water, and other electrolytes. Excretion of acid and potassium also is impaired. In more severe ATN, the tubular lumen is filled with epithelial casts, causing intraluminal obstruction, resulting in the decline of GFR.

Acute interstitial nephritis is characterized by inflammation and edema, resulting in azotemia, hematuria, sterile pyuria, white cell casts with variable eosinophiluria, proteinuria, and hyaline casts. The net effect is a loss of urinary concentrating ability, with low osmolality (usually < 500 mOsm/L), low specific gravity (< 1.015), high urinary sodium (>40 mEq/L), and occasionally, hyperkalemia and renal tubular acidosis. However, in the presence of a superimposed prerenal azotemia, the specific gravity, osmolality, and sodium may be misleading.

Glomerulonephritis or vasculitis is suggested by the presence of hematuria, red cells, white cells, granular and cellular casts, and a variable degree of proteinuria. Nephrotic syndrome usually is not associated with active inflammation and often presents as proteinuria greater than 3.5 g/24 h.

Glomerular diseases may reduce GFR due to changes in basement membrane permeability and because of stimulation of the renin-aldosterone axis. Glomerular diseases often manifest as nephrotic or nephric syndrome. In nephrotic syndrome, the urinary sediment is inactive, and there is gross proteinuria (>3.5 g/d), hypoalbuminemia, hyperlipidemia, and edema. Azotemia and hypertension are uncommon initially, but their presence may indicate advanced disease. Some patients with nephrotic syndrome may present with ARF. Impairment of capillary circulation in the kidney due to edema (nephrosarca) and tubular obstruction from protein casts have been proposed as potential mechanisms for the development of ARF in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

In nephritic syndrome, the urinary sediment is active with white or red cell casts, granular casts, and azotemia. Proteinuria is less obvious, but increased salt and water retention in glomerulonephritis can lead to hypertension, edema formation, decreased output, low urinary excretion of sodium, and increased specific gravity.

Acute vascular diseases include vasculitis syndromes, malignant hypertension, scleroderma renal crisis, and thromboembolic disease, all of which cause renal hypoperfusion and ischemia leading to azotemia. Chronic vascular diseases are due to hypertensive benign nephrosclerosis, which has not been conclusively associated with end-stage renal disease and ischemic renal disease from bilateral renal artery stenosis.[2]

In bilateral renal artery stenosis, maintenance of adequate intraglomerular pressure for filtration greatly depends on efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction. Azotemia sets in when angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin type 2 receptor blockers cause efferent arteriolar dilatation, thereby decreasing intraglomerular pressure and filtration. Therefore, converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers are contraindicated in bilateral renal artery stenosis.

In addition to accumulation of urea creatinine and other waste products, a substantial reduction in GFR in CKD results in decreased production of erythropoietin (causing anemia) and vitamin D-3 (causing hypocalcemia, secondary hyperparathyroidism, hyperphosphatemia, and renal osteodystrophy); reduction in acid, potassium, salt, and water excretion (causing acidosis, hyperkalemia, hypertension, and edema); and platelet dysfunction, which leads to increased bleeding tendencies.

The syndrome associated with the signs and symptoms of accumulation of toxic waste products (uremic toxins) is termed uremia and often occurs at a GFR of about 10 mL/min. Some of the uremic toxins (ie, urea, creatinine, phenols, guanidines) have been identified, but none has been found responsible for all the manifestations of uremia.

Postrenal azotemia

Postrenal azotemia refers to elevation in BUN and creatinine levels because of obstruction in the collecting system. Obstruction to flow leads to a reversal of Starling forces responsible for glomerular filtration. Progressive bilateral obstruction causes hydronephrosis with an increase in the Bowman capsular hydrostatic pressure and tubular blockage resulting in progressive decline and ultimate cessation in glomerular filtration, azotemia, acidosis, fluid overload, and hyperkalemia.

Unilateral obstruction rarely causes azotemia. With relief of complete ureteral obstruction within 48 hours of onset, there is evidence that relatively complete recovery of GFR can be achieved within a week, while little or no further recovery occurs after 12 weeks. Complete or prolonged partial obstruction can lead to tubular atrophy and irreversible renal fibrosis. Hydronephrosis may be absent if obstruction is mild or acute or if the collecting system is encased by retroperitoneal tumor or fibrosis.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Considerable variability exists in reports about the incidence of hospital or community-acquired ARF. In one report, community-acquired ARF occurred in about 1% of all hospital admissions. Overall, ARF occurs in about 5% of all hospital admissions. However, differences exist in ARF occurring in the intensive care unit (about 15%) and in the coronary care unit (about 4%). In CKD, progressive azotemia leading to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation occurs in a number of chronic diseases with frequencies for diabetes (36%), hypertension (24%), glomerulonephritis (15%), cystic kidney disease (4%), uncertain (5%), and all other known miscellaneous renal disorders (15%).

International

A report from Madrid evaluated 748 cases of ARF at 13 tertiary hospital centers. The most frequent causes were ATN (45%); prerenal (21%); acute or chronic renal failure, mostly due to ATN and prerenal disease (13%); urinary tract obstruction (10%); glomerulonephritis or vasculitis (4%); acute interstitial nephritis (2%); and atheroemboli (1%). Etiologies of CKD differ around the world. Diabetic nephropathy as a cause of CKD is on the rise in developed and developing countries.

Mortality/Morbidity

  • Prognosis in ARF generally is poor and depends on the severity of the underlying disease and the number of failed organs. While mortality rate in simple ARF without other underlying disease is 7-23%, the mortality in the patient in the intensive care unit on mechanical ventilation is as high as 80%.
  • The prognosis of patients with CKD depends on the etiology of the failure. Patients with diabetic kidney disease, hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and ischemic nephropathy (ie, large-vessel arterial occlusive disease) tend to have progressive azotemia resulting in end-stage renal disease. Different types of glomerulonephritis have major differences in prognosis, with some being quite benign and rarely progressing to end-stage renal disease, whereas others have rapid progression to end-stage renal disease within months. About 50% of patients with polycystic kidney disease progress to end-stage renal disease by the fifth or sixth decade of life.

Race

In the 2008 annual report of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), more than 500,000 patients with end-stage renal disease were receiving dialysis or a kidney transplant in the United States. Racial distribution was reported as Asian/Pacific Islander (4.7%), black (32.0%), white (61.0%), American Indian (1.3%), and other/unknown (0.6%).

Sex

Of the patients reported in the 2008 annual report of the USRDS, male frequency is 56.0% and female frequency is 44.0%.

Age

Of the patients reported in the 2008 annual report of the USRDS, frequencies for patients aged 0-19 years is 1.5%; aged 20-44 years, 19.1%; aged 45-64 years, 44.0%; aged 65-74 years, 19.6%; and older than 75 years, 15.7%.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP  Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Chief, Division of Nephrology, Director of Nephrology Fellowship Program and Transplant Nephrology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center

Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Transplantation, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Onyekachi Ifudu, MD  Director of Inpatient Dialysis Services, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Frank C Brosius III, MD  Nephrology Program Director, Professor of Internal Medicine and Physiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan School of Medicine

Frank C Brosius III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Diabetes Association, American Society of Nephrology, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

George R Aronoff, MD  Director, Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Section of Nephrology, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine

George R Aronoff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, International Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, Renal Physicians Association, and West Virginia State Medical Association

Disclosure: Abbott Grant/research funds Speaking and teaching; AMAG Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Amgen Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Ortho Biotech Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Renal Ventures Ownership interest Other

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Delanaye P, Cohen EP. Formula-based estimates of the GFR: equations variable and uncertain. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(1):c48-53. [Medline].

  2. Eklof H, Bergqvist D, Hagg A, et al. Outcome after endovascular revascularization of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Acta Radiol. Apr 2009;50(3):256-64. [Medline].

  3. Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. Dec 2002;62(6):2223-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, et al. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol. Mar 2009;50(2):181-93. [Medline].

  5. Sofocleous CT, Bahramipour P, Mele C, et al. Transvenous transjugular renal core biopsy with a redesigned biopsy set including a blunt-tipped needle. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. Mar-Apr 2002;25(2):155-7. [Medline].

  6. Fenske W, Stork S, Koschker AC, et al. Value of fractional uric acid excretion in differential diagnosis of hyponatremic patients on diuretics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2008;93(8):2991-7. [Medline].

  7. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. Jun 29 2006;354(26):2773-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Recio-Mayoral A, Chaparro M, Prado B, et al. The reno-protective effect of hydration with sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: the RENO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 27 2007;49(12):1283-8. [Medline].

  9. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med. Jul 20 2000;343(3):180-4. [Medline].

  10. Liu KD, Matthay MA, Chertow GM. Evolving practices in critical care and potential implications for management of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Jul 2006;1(4):869-73. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Bellomo R. Defining, quantifying, and classifying acute renal failure. Crit Care Clin. Apr 2005;21(2):223-37. [Medline].

  12. Burgess E. Conservative treatment to slow deterioration of renal function: evidence-based recommendations. Kidney Int Suppl. Jun 1999;70:S17-25. [Medline].

  13. Espinel CH, Gregory AW. Differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Clin Nephrol. Feb 1980;13(2):73-7. [Medline].

  14. Johnson CA, Levey AS, Coresh J, Levin A, Lau J, Eknoyan G. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in adults: Part I. Definition, disease stages, evaluation, treatment, and risk factors. Am Fam Physician. Sep 1 2004;70(5):869-76. [Medline].

  15. Kassirer JP. Clinical evaluation of kidney function--glomerular function. N Engl J Med. Aug 12 1971;285(7):385-9. [Medline].

  16. Kimmel PL. Management of the patient with chronic renal disease. In: Greenberg A, ed. Primer on Kidney Diseases. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1994:289.

  17. Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease [clinical conference]. Kidney Int. Jul 1990;38(1):167-84. [Medline].

  18. Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int. Jul 1990;38(1):167-84. [Medline].

  19. Martinez FD, Solomon S, Holberg CJ, Graves PE, Baldini M, Erickson RP. Linkage of circulating eosinophils to markers on chromosome 5q. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 1998;158(6):1739-44. [Medline].

  20. Memoli B, Libetta C, Conte G, Andreucci VE. Loop diuretics and renal vasodilators in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9 Suppl 4:168-71. [Medline].

  21. Michel DM, Kelly CJ. Acute interstitial nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. Mar 1998;9(3):506-15. [Medline].

  22. Nissenson AR. Acute renal failure: definition and pathogenesis. Kidney Int Suppl. May 1998;66:S7-10. [Medline].

  23. Pilote L, Eisenberg MJ. Prevention of radiocontrast-induced renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. Apr 13 1995;332(15):1035-6. [Medline].

  24. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J Med. Aug 19 1999;341(8):577-85. [Medline].

  25. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. Aug 17 2005;294(7):813-8. [Medline].

  26. Venkataraman R. Prevention of acute renal failure. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21:281-9. [Medline].

  27. Steinhäuslin F, Burnier M, Magnin JL, Munafo A, Buclin T, Diezi J, et al. Fractional Excretion of Trace Lithium and Uric Acid inAcute Renal Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. Jan 1994;4(7):1429-37. [Medline].

  28. Anderson RJ, Schrier RW:. Edited by Schrier RW, Gottschalk CW. Acute renal failure. In Diseases of theKidney. Boston: Little, Brown; 1997:1069-1113. [Full Text].

Previous
Next
 
The graph shows the relationship of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to steady-state serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. As shown in this figure, in early renal disease, substantial decline in GFR may lead to only a slight elevation in serum creatinine. Elevation in serum creatinine is apparent only when the GFR falls to about 70 mL/min.
Diagnostic Images in Azotemia: Although these indices are helpful, it is not necessary to perform all these tests on a particular patient. Comparison should always be made with the patients baseline values to identify trends consistent with increase or decrease in effective circulating volume. It should be noted that use of some of these indices may be limited in certain clinical conditions, such as in anemia (hematocrit), hypocalcemia (serum calcium), decreased mucle mass (serum creatinine), liver disease (BUN, total protein, albumin), poor nutritional state (BUN, total protein, albumin) and use of diuretics (urine Na). FEUrea and FELi appear to be better in assessing prerenal status in patients on diuretics.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.