Azotemia Workup

  • Author: Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP; Chief Editor: Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN   more...
 
Updated: Dec 1, 2010
 

Laboratory Studies

  • Obtain CBC count, biochemical profile, urinalysis, and urine electrolytes for the initial evaluation. In addition to establishing the presence of systemic disease, clues for the origin of azotemia may emerge from these tests. Diagnostic indices commonly used to differentiate prerenal from intrarenal or postrenal azotemia are summarized in the image below. Diagnostic Images in Azotemia: Although these indiDiagnostic Images in Azotemia: Although these indices are helpful, it is not necessary to perform all these tests on a particular patient. Comparison should always be made with the patients baseline values to identify trends consistent with increase or decrease in effective circulating volume. It should be noted that use of some of these indices may be limited in certain clinical conditions, such as in anemia (hematocrit), hypocalcemia (serum calcium), decreased mucle mass (serum creatinine), liver disease (BUN, total protein, albumin), poor nutritional state (BUN, total protein, albumin) and use of diuretics (urine Na). FEUrea and FELi appear to be better in assessing prerenal status in patients on diuretics.
  • Prerenal azotemia
    • In prerenal azotemia, hemoconcentration results in elevation of hematocrit, total protein/albumin, calcium, bicarbonate, and uric acid from their baselines.
    • Oliguria (urine volume is < 500 mL/d), anuria (< 100 mL/d), high urine specific gravity (>1.015), normal urinary sediment, and low urinary sodium (< 20 fractional excretion of sodium [FENa] < 1.0%) are seen.
    • When volume depletion is predominant, exaggerated proximal tubular reabsorption results in azotemia, hypernatremia, elevated levels of calcium, uric acid, and bicarbonate, while hemoconcentration results in the elevation of total protein, albumin, and hematocrit levels from their baselines. When hypoperfusion due to decreased cardiac output or effective arterial volume is present, patients exhibit edema, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia. The hematocrit, calcium, uric acid, and bicarbonate levels vary widely in this category. These patients often are critically ill.
    • The FENa has traditionally been used to differentiate prerenal azotemia from ATN. An FENa below 1% is suggestive of a prerenal cause (eg, volume depletion), while an FENa above 2% is suggestive of ATN. Since the FENa is based on the fact that sodium reabsorption is enhanced in the setting of volume depletion, active use of diuretics may elevate the FENa even when volume depletion is present. The fractional excretion of urea or fractional excretion of urea nitrogen (FEUrea), or the fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA), are the alternatives, because urea and uric acid excretion are not influenced by diuretics. An FEUrea of less than 35% or an FEUA of less than 25% is suggestive of a prerenal etiology of ARF, while an FEUrea of more than 50% or an FEUA above 25% suggests ATN.[3]
  • Intrarenal azotemia
    • Anemia, thrombocytopenia, hypocalcemia, and high anion gap metabolic acidosis may suggest intrarenal azotemia.
    • Low urine specific gravity (< 1.015), active urinary sediment (see Pathophysiology), high urinary sodium (>40 mEq/L), FENa (>5%), plasma BUN–creatinine ratio (< 20), and low urine osmolality may suggest intrarenal azotemia.
    • For patients with long-standing CKD, a renal sonogram usually shows small, contracted kidneys. Some causes of CKD can be associated with normal or large-sized kidneys, such as HIV nephropathy, diabetes, and renal amyloidosis. The renal sonogram usually is diagnostic for patients with polycystic kidney disease. In patients with active urinary sediment, progressive azotemia, proteinuria, and/or normal-sized kidneys on sonogram, a renal biopsy should be considered. Consultation with a nephrologist is imperative in all such patients.
  • Postrenal azotemia
    • Urinary indices in postrenal azotemia due to complete bilateral obstruction are usually nondiagnostic. The prima facie finding here is anuria and, occasionally, hypertension. Urine output still may be present if overflow (in bladder outlet obstruction) or partial ureteral obstruction is present.
    • A Foley catheter should be inserted as part of the initial evaluation to rule out obstruction below the bladder outlet. Unilateral ureteral obstruction rarely leads to azotemia; it occurs acutely (due to obstruction from calculi, papillary necrosis, or hematoma), producing renal colic, or may be chronic and asymptomatic, producing hydronephrosis.
    • Bilateral partial obstruction may be associated with azotemia in the presence of normal urine output. When patients are subjected to maneuvers that increase urinary flow (eg, diuretic renogram, perfusion pressure flow studies), they may exhibit an increase in size or pressure of the collecting system or experience pain.
    • In addition to azotemia, polyuria due to loss of concentrating ability and type 1 renal tubular acidosis, with hyperkalemia, hypercalcemia from metastatic pelvic tumor, and elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), may be clues to postrenal azotemia. Hydronephrosis in the absence of hydroureter may be seen in early (< 3 d) obstruction, retroperitoneal process, or partial obstruction. Renal sonogram is the test of choice to rule out obstructive uropathy. If renal sonogram is equivocal, a Lasix washout scan, as discussed below in Imaging Studies, should be performed.
Next

Imaging Studies

  • Plain film of abdomen
    • If symptoms suggest nephrolithiasis, a plain film of the abdomen is performed to screen for presence of a radiopaque stone.
    • Calcium-containing, struvite, and cystine stones can be identified, but radiolucent ones, such as uric acid stones, will be missed.
  • Renal sonogram is the most commonly used renal imaging study because of its ease of use and broad application for the following:
    • Renal sonogram can determine renal size, which is important when considering renal biopsy. Small kidneys (< 9 cm) may be suggestive of scarring from advanced renal disease, whereas normal or large kidneys with smooth contours may indicate a potentially reversible process.
    • It can differentiate cystic lesions from solid lesions.
    • It is a test of choice for diagnosing urinary tract obstruction.
    • Renal sonogram can detect kidney stones.
  • Doppler renal ultrasonography can be used to evaluate renal vascular flow (eg, renal vein thrombosis, renal infarction, renal artery stenosis).
  • Intravenous pyelogram
    • The risk of contrast nephrotoxicity should be weighed against the benefits of making a diagnosis that will not change management.
    • Intravenous pyelogram can provide detailed information concerning calyceal anatomy and the size and shape of the kidney.
    • It is extremely useful for detecting renal stones.
    • It is the preferred technique in the evaluation and diagnosis of certain structural disorders, such as chronic pyelonephritis, medullary sponge kidney, and papillary necrosis.
    • It can provide data on the degree of obstruction.
  • Computed tomography (CT) scanning[4] is complementary to ultrasonography, especially when the diagnosis is uncertain. Contrast nephrotoxicity should be weighed against the benefits. CT scanning does the following:
    • It can be used to distinguish (in most cases) neoplastic lesions from simple cyst and is the criterion standard for radiologic diagnosis of renal stone disease, including radiolucent stones.
    • It can be used to evaluate and stage renal cell carcinoma and to diagnose renal vein thrombosis. It can diagnose polycystic kidney disease with higher sensitivity than ultrasonography, particularly in younger patients.
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)
    • MRI or MRA is used only when CT scanning and ultrasonography are nondiagnostic.
    • They are the criterion standard for diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis.
    • They are used in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma and renal artery stenosis or vasculitis.
  • Renal arteriography
    • The availability of procedures not requiring contrast material (ie, sonography, MRI, MRA) and the risk of contracting contrast nephrotoxicity have reduced use of this test.
    • Renal arteriography is used in polyarteritis nodosa and renal artery stenosis to demonstrate multiple aneurysms and/or stenoses.
  • Renal venography
    • Risk of contrast nephrotoxicity is present.
    • Renal venography is the criterion standard for diagnosis of renal vein thrombosis.
  • Radionuclide studies
    • Technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid (99m Tc DMSA) distributes heavily within the renal parenchyma at first pass and so is best for detecting renal parenchymal scarring.
    • Technetium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (99m Tc DTPA) is heavily filtered at first pass and therefore is best for qualitative assessment of renal function (filtration, and excretion). Because it is heavily filtered, it is most sensitive in detecting urine leaks after renal transplant. For the same reason, it is also used concomitantly with Lasix washout scan (see below) for assessing functional obstruction of the collecting system.
    • Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) scan is evenly distributed at first pass in the kidney and so is best for qualitative assessment of perfusion, filtration, and excretion. It is the preferred test after renal transplantation, to assess the 3 aspects of function. It can be used to detect urine leaks or functional obstruction with Lasix, although99m Tc DTPA scan remains the test of choice for these conditions. Voiding cystourethrogram can be performed with a radionuclide study, to detect vesicoureteral reflux.
  • Retrograde or anterograde pyelography
    • This test has limited use because of the availability of sonography.
    • It may be used in patients with a high index of suspicion for hydronephrosis for whom sonogram results are normal, such as in retroperitoneal fibrosis.
  • Lasix washout scan
    • The 2 agents used in performing Lasix washout renal scans are99m Tc DTPA and MAG3.
    • Usually, the renal scan is performed first. Then, if needed, the Lasix washout is performed after the radionuclide has accumulated in the collecting system. Lasix is used as a part of the renogram to separate nonobstructive hydronephrosis from obstructive hydronephrosis. If there is no obstruction, flow induced by Lasix and containing little or no radionuclide will fill the collecting system, washing out urine that contains radionuclide from the system. However, in the presence of obstruction, the radionuclide is not washed out as quickly.
    • The half life or clearance of the radioisotope is plotted on a curve. A half life of less than 10 minutes is considered normal, of greater than 20 minutes is considered obstruction, and of between 10-20 minutes is subject to further interpretation.
    • Conditions that can make it difficult to interpret the Lasix washout curve include a megaureter or pelvis that accepts a large bolus of urine and poor renal function. In patients with a megaureter, it can be difficult to determine when the renal pelvis is full, and, in patients with renal disease, Lasix onset of action may be prolonged. To overcome the problem of poor renal function or relative hypovolemia if a patient has been fasting, the patient should be well hydrated with IV fluids prior to the study.
    • The test also is operator dependent, as the Lasix should be administered when it is thought that the renal pelvis is full. A full bladder also delays washout of isotope. Therefore, the patient's bladder needs to be catheterized before the study can be performed.
Previous
Next

Procedures

  • Renal biopsy is indicated when glomerulonephritis, vasculitis, and, occasionally, interstitial nephritis are suspected to establish correct diagnosis and to guide therapy. The following are common indications for renal biopsy:
    • Isolated glomerular proteinuria or hematuria
    • Nephrotic syndrome
    • Acute nephritic syndrome
    • Unexplained acute or subacute renal failure
  • Percutaneous renal biopsy complications
    • Severe bleeding causing hypotension occurs in 1-2% of patients.
    • Bleeding requiring transfusion occurs in about 0.1-0.3% of patients. Bleeding complications can be minimized by data obtained from tests for bleeding time, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and platelet count. NSAIDs should be stopped at least 1 week prior to a scheduled elective biopsy. Patients on Coumadin should be started on heparin at least 3 days prior to renal biopsy. Patients on heparin for other reasons should be stopped for at least 1 day.
  • Percutaneous renal biopsy contraindications
    • Contraindications include uncorrectable bleeding diathesis, small kidneys, severe hypertension, multiple bilateral cysts or renal tumor, hydronephrosis, active renal or perirenal infection, and uncooperative patient.
    • Percutaneous biopsy may be performed in selected patients with a solitary kidney because of the generally low risk of bleeding.
  • Open renal biopsy may be performed if a percutaneous attempt either is unsuccessful or contraindicated and if the benefits of diagnosis outweigh the risks.
  • When percutaneous biopsy is contraindicated but a diagnosis is necessary, a transvenous transjugular renal core biopsy can be performed.[5] With this approach, bleeding occurs intravascularly, thereby reducing the risk of hematoma.
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP  Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Chief, Division of Nephrology, Director of Nephrology Fellowship Program and Transplant Nephrology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center

Moro O Salifu, MD, MPH, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, American Society of Diagnostic and Interventional Nephrology, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Transplantation, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Onyekachi Ifudu, MD  Director of Inpatient Dialysis Services, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Frank C Brosius III, MD  Nephrology Program Director, Professor of Internal Medicine and Physiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Michigan School of Medicine

Frank C Brosius III, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Diabetes Association, American Society of Nephrology, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine

Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment

George R Aronoff, MD  Director, Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Section of Nephrology, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine

George R Aronoff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, International Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, Renal Physicians Association, and West Virginia State Medical Association

Disclosure: Abbott Grant/research funds Speaking and teaching; AMAG Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Amgen Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Ortho Biotech Honoraria Speaking and teaching; Renal Ventures Ownership interest Other

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Delanaye P, Cohen EP. Formula-based estimates of the GFR: equations variable and uncertain. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110(1):c48-53. [Medline].

  2. Eklof H, Bergqvist D, Hagg A, et al. Outcome after endovascular revascularization of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Acta Radiol. Apr 2009;50(3):256-64. [Medline].

  3. Carvounis CP, Nisar S, Guro-Razuman S. Significance of the fractional excretion of urea in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Kidney Int. Dec 2002;62(6):2223-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  4. Holmquist F, Hansson K, Pasquariello F, et al. Minimizing contrast medium doses to diagnose pulmonary embolism with 80-kVp multidetector computed tomography in azotemic patients. Acta Radiol. Mar 2009;50(2):181-93. [Medline].

  5. Sofocleous CT, Bahramipour P, Mele C, et al. Transvenous transjugular renal core biopsy with a redesigned biopsy set including a blunt-tipped needle. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. Mar-Apr 2002;25(2):155-7. [Medline].

  6. Fenske W, Stork S, Koschker AC, et al. Value of fractional uric acid excretion in differential diagnosis of hyponatremic patients on diuretics. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Aug 2008;93(8):2991-7. [Medline].

  7. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Marana I, et al. N-acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. Jun 29 2006;354(26):2773-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Recio-Mayoral A, Chaparro M, Prado B, et al. The reno-protective effect of hydration with sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention: the RENO Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 27 2007;49(12):1283-8. [Medline].

  9. Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N Engl J Med. Jul 20 2000;343(3):180-4. [Medline].

  10. Liu KD, Matthay MA, Chertow GM. Evolving practices in critical care and potential implications for management of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. Jul 2006;1(4):869-73. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Bellomo R. Defining, quantifying, and classifying acute renal failure. Crit Care Clin. Apr 2005;21(2):223-37. [Medline].

  12. Burgess E. Conservative treatment to slow deterioration of renal function: evidence-based recommendations. Kidney Int Suppl. Jun 1999;70:S17-25. [Medline].

  13. Espinel CH, Gregory AW. Differential diagnosis of acute renal failure. Clin Nephrol. Feb 1980;13(2):73-7. [Medline].

  14. Johnson CA, Levey AS, Coresh J, Levin A, Lau J, Eknoyan G. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in adults: Part I. Definition, disease stages, evaluation, treatment, and risk factors. Am Fam Physician. Sep 1 2004;70(5):869-76. [Medline].

  15. Kassirer JP. Clinical evaluation of kidney function--glomerular function. N Engl J Med. Aug 12 1971;285(7):385-9. [Medline].

  16. Kimmel PL. Management of the patient with chronic renal disease. In: Greenberg A, ed. Primer on Kidney Diseases. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1994:289.

  17. Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease [clinical conference]. Kidney Int. Jul 1990;38(1):167-84. [Medline].

  18. Levey AS. Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int. Jul 1990;38(1):167-84. [Medline].

  19. Martinez FD, Solomon S, Holberg CJ, Graves PE, Baldini M, Erickson RP. Linkage of circulating eosinophils to markers on chromosome 5q. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Dec 1998;158(6):1739-44. [Medline].

  20. Memoli B, Libetta C, Conte G, Andreucci VE. Loop diuretics and renal vasodilators in acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9 Suppl 4:168-71. [Medline].

  21. Michel DM, Kelly CJ. Acute interstitial nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. Mar 1998;9(3):506-15. [Medline].

  22. Nissenson AR. Acute renal failure: definition and pathogenesis. Kidney Int Suppl. May 1998;66:S7-10. [Medline].

  23. Pilote L, Eisenberg MJ. Prevention of radiocontrast-induced renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. Apr 13 1995;332(15):1035-6. [Medline].

  24. Schrier RW, Abraham WT. Hormones and hemodynamics in heart failure. N Engl J Med. Aug 19 1999;341(8):577-85. [Medline].

  25. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. Aug 17 2005;294(7):813-8. [Medline].

  26. Venkataraman R. Prevention of acute renal failure. Crit Care Clin. 2005;21:281-9. [Medline].

  27. Steinhäuslin F, Burnier M, Magnin JL, Munafo A, Buclin T, Diezi J, et al. Fractional Excretion of Trace Lithium and Uric Acid inAcute Renal Failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. Jan 1994;4(7):1429-37. [Medline].

  28. Anderson RJ, Schrier RW:. Edited by Schrier RW, Gottschalk CW. Acute renal failure. In Diseases of theKidney. Boston: Little, Brown; 1997:1069-1113. [Full Text].

Previous
Next
 
The graph shows the relationship of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to steady-state serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. As shown in this figure, in early renal disease, substantial decline in GFR may lead to only a slight elevation in serum creatinine. Elevation in serum creatinine is apparent only when the GFR falls to about 70 mL/min.
Diagnostic Images in Azotemia: Although these indices are helpful, it is not necessary to perform all these tests on a particular patient. Comparison should always be made with the patients baseline values to identify trends consistent with increase or decrease in effective circulating volume. It should be noted that use of some of these indices may be limited in certain clinical conditions, such as in anemia (hematocrit), hypocalcemia (serum calcium), decreased mucle mass (serum creatinine), liver disease (BUN, total protein, albumin), poor nutritional state (BUN, total protein, albumin) and use of diuretics (urine Na). FEUrea and FELi appear to be better in assessing prerenal status in patients on diuretics.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.