eMedicine Specialties > Nephrology > Hypertension and the Kidney

Hypertension

Author: Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Coauthor(s): Claude Kortas, MD, Program Director, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 6, 2008

Introduction

Background

Hypertension is one of the most common worldwide diseases afflicting humans. Because of the associated morbidity and mortality and the cost to society, hypertension is an important public health challenge. Over the past several decades, extensive research, widespread patient education, and a concerted effort on the part of health care professionals have led to decreased mortality and morbidity rates from the multiple organ damage arising from years of untreated hypertension. Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for coronary heart disease (the leading cause of death in North America), stroke (the third leading cause), congestive heart failure, end-stage renal disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Therefore, health care professionals must not only identify and treat patients with hypertension but also promote a healthy lifestyle and preventive strategies to decrease the prevalence of hypertension in the general population.

Historical perspectives

Blood pressure was measured for the first time by Stephen Hales in 1773. Hales also described the importance of blood volume in blood pressure regulation. The contribution of peripheral arterioles in maintaining blood pressure, described as "tone," was first described by Lower in 1669 and subsequently by Sénac in 1783. The role of vasomotor nerves in the regulation of blood pressure was observed by such eminent investigators as Claude Bernard, Charles E. Edouard, Charles Brown-Séquard, and Augustus Waller. William Dayliss advanced this concept in a monograph published in 1923. Cannon and Rosenblueth developed the concept of humoral control of blood pressure and investigated pharmacologic effects of epinephrine. Three contributors who advanced the knowledge of humoral mechanisms of blood pressure control are T.R. Elliott, Sir Henry Dale, and Otto Loew.

Richard Bright, a physician who practiced in the first half of the 19th century, observed the changes of hypertension on the cardiovascular system in patients with chronic renal disease. George Johnson in 1868 postulated that the cause of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in Bright disease was the presence of muscular hypertrophy in the smaller arteries throughout the body. Further clinical pathologic studies by Sir William Gull and H.G. Sutton (1872) led to further description of the cardiovascular changes of hypertension. Frederick Mahomed was one of the first physicians to systematically incorporate blood pressure measurement as a part of a clinical evaluation.

The recognition of primary, or essential, hypertension is credited to the work of Huchard, Vonbasch, and Albutt. Observations of Janeway and Walhard led to the recognition of target organ damage, which branded hypertension as the "silent killer." The concepts of renin, angiotensin, and aldosterone were advanced by several investigators in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The names of Irwine, Page, van Slyke, Goldblatt, Laragh, and Tuttle prominently appear throughout the hypertension literature, and their work enhances our understanding of the biochemical basis of essential hypertension. Cushman and Ondetti developed an orally acting converting enzyme inhibitor from snake venom peptides and are credited with the successful synthesis of the modern antihypertensive captopril.

Definition

Defining abnormally high blood pressure is extremely difficult and arbitrary. Furthermore, the relationship between systemic arterial pressure and morbidity appears to be quantitative rather than qualitative. A level for high blood pressure must be agreed upon in clinical practice for screening patients with hypertension and for instituting diagnostic evaluation and initiating therapy. Because the risk to an individual patient may correlate with the severity of hypertension, a classification system is essential for making decisions about aggressiveness of treatment or therapeutic interventions.

Based on recommendations of the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VII), the classification of blood pressure (expressed in mm Hg) for adults aged 18 years or older is as follows*:

  • Normal† - Systolic lower than 120, diastolic lower than 80
  • Prehypertension - Systolic 120-139, diastolic 80-99
  • Stage 1 - Systolic 140-159, diastolic 90-99
  • Stage 2 - Systolic equal to or more than 160, diastolic equal to or more than 100

*Based on the average of 2 or more readings taken at each of 2 or more visits after initial screening

†Normal blood pressure with respect to cardiovascular risk is less than 120/80 mm Hg. However, unusually low readings should be evaluated for clinical significance.

Prehypertension, a new category designated in the JNC VII report, emphasizes that patients with prehypertension are at risk for progression to hypertension and that lifestyle modifications are important preventive strategies.

Hypertension may be either essential or secondary. Essential hypertension is diagnosed in the absence of an identifiable secondary cause. Approximately 95% of American adults have essential hypertension, while secondary hypertension accounts for fewer than 5% of the cases.

Pathophysiology

Arterial blood pressure is a product of cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. Therefore, determinants of blood pressure include factors that affect both cardiac output and arteriolar vascular physiology. There is potential relevance of blood viscosity, vascular wall sheer conditions (rate and stress), and blood flow velocity (mean and pulsatile components) on vascular and endothelial function regulating blood pressure in humans. Furthermore, changes in vascular wall thickness affect the amplification of peripheral vascular resistance in hypertensive patients and result in reflection of waves back to the aorta, increasing systolic blood pressure.

Regulation of blood pressure

Regulation of normal blood pressure is a complex process. Although a function of cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance, both of these variables are influenced by multiple factors.

The factors affecting cardiac output include sodium intake, renal function, and mineralocorticoids; the inotropic effects occur via extracellular fluid volume augmentation and an increase in heart rate and contractility. Peripheral vascular resistance is dependent upon the sympathetic nervous system, humoral factors, and local autoregulation. The sympathetic nervous system produces its effects via the vasoconstrictor alpha effect or the vasodilator beta effect. The humoral actions on peripheral resistance are also mediated by other mediators such as vasoconstrictors (angiotensin and catecholamines) or vasodilators (prostaglandins and kinins). For additional resource, please visit Angiotensin II Receptor Blockade.

Autoregulation of blood pressure occurs by way of intravascular volume contraction and expansion, as well as by transfer of transcapillary fluid. Interactions between cardiac output and peripheral resistance are autoregulated to maintain a set blood pressure in an individual. For example, constriction of the arterioles elevates arterial pressure by increasing total peripheral resistance, whereas venular constriction leads to redistribution of the peripheral intravascular volume to the central circulation, thereby increasing preload and cardiac output.

Pathogenesis of hypertension

The pathogenesis of essential hypertension is multifactorial and highly complex. Multiple factors modulate the blood pressure for adequate tissue perfusion and include humoral mediators, vascular reactivity, circulating blood volume, vascular caliber, blood viscosity, cardiac output, blood vessel elasticity, and neural stimulation. A possible pathogenesis of essential hypertension has been proposed in which multiple factors, including genetic predisposition, excess dietary salt intake, and adrenergic tone, may interact to produce hypertension. Although genetics appears to contribute to essential hypertension, the exact mechanism has not been established.

The natural history of essential hypertension evolves from occasional to established hypotension. After a long invariable asymptomatic period, persistent hypertension develops into complicated hypertension, in which target organ damage to the aorta and small arteries, heart, kidneys, retina, and central nervous system is evident. The progression begins with prehypertension in persons aged 10-30 years (by increased cardiac output) to early hypertension in persons aged 20-40 years (in which increased peripheral resistance is prominent) to established hypertension in persons aged 30-50 years, and, finally, to complicated hypertension in persons aged 40-60 years.

The early stage of hypertension has been described as high-output hypertension. High-output hypertension results from decreased peripheral vascular resistance and concomitant cardiac stimulation by adrenergic hyperactivity and altered calcium homeostasis. In contrast, the chronic phase of essential hypertension characteristically has normal or reduced cardiac output and elevated systemic vascular resistance.

The vasoreactivity of the vascular bed, an important phenomenon mediating changes of hypertension, is influenced by the activity of vasoactive factors, reactivity of the smooth muscle cells, and structural changes in the vessel wall and vessel caliber, expressed by a lumen-to-wall ratio. Patients who develop hypertension are known to develop a systemic hypertensive response secondary to vasoconstrictive stimuli. Alterations in structural and physical properties of resistance arteries, as well as changes in endothelial function, are probably responsible for this abnormal behavior of vasculature. Furthermore, vascular remodeling occurs over the years as hypertension evolves, thereby maintaining increased vascular resistance irrespective of the initial hemodynamic pattern.

Genetic factors

Hypertension is likely to be related to multiple genes. Hypertension develops secondary to multiple environmental factors, as well as to several genes, whose inheritance appears to be complex. Very rare secondary causes are related to single genes.

Role of the vascular endothelium

The vascular endothelium is presently considered a vital organ, where synthesis of various vasodilating and constricting mediators occurs. The interaction of autocrine and paracrine factors takes place in the vascular endothelium, leading to growth and remodeling of the vessel wall and to the hemodynamic regulation of blood pressure.

Numerous hormonal, humeral vasoactive, and growth and regulating peptides are produced in the vascular endothelium. These mediators include angiotensin II, bradykinin, endothelin, nitric oxide, and several other growth factors. Endothelin is a potent vasoconstrictor and growth factor that likely plays a major role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Angiotensin II is a potent vasoconstrictor synthesized from angiotensin I with the help of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Another vasoactive substance manufactured in the endothelium is nitric oxide. Nitric oxide is an extremely potent vasodilator that influences local autoregulation and other vital organ functions. Additionally, several growth factors are manufactured in the vascular endothelium; each of these plays an important role in atherogenesis and target organ damage. These factors include platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, insulin growth factor, and many others.

Pathophysiology of target organ damage

Hypertension and the cardiovascular system

Cardiac involvement in hypertension manifests as LVH, left atrial enlargement, aortic root dilatation, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, systolic and diastolic heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. LVH is associated with an increased risk of premature death and morbidity. A higher frequency of cardiac atrial and ventricular dysrhythmias and sudden cardiac death may exist. Possibly, increased coronary arteriolar resistance leads to reduced blood flow to the hypertrophied myocardium, resulting in angina despite clean coronary arteries. Hypertension, along with reduced oxygen supply and other risk factors, accelerates the process of atherogenesis, thereby further reducing oxygen delivery to the myocardium.

Hypertension remains the most common cause of congestive heart failure. Antihypertensive therapy has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of death from stroke and coronary heart disease. Two published meta-analyses have shown 14% and 26% reductions in cardiovascular mortality rates.

Left ventricular hypertrophy

The myocardium undergoes structural changes in response to increased afterload. Cardiac myocytes respond by hypertrophy, allowing the heart to pump more strongly against the elevated pressure. However, the contractile function of the left ventricle remains normal until later stages. Eventually, LVH lessens the chamber lumen, limiting diastolic filling and stroke volume. The left ventricular diastolic function is markedly compromised in long-standing hypertension.

The mechanisms of diastolic dysfunction have been elucidated only recently. An aberration in the passive relaxation of the left ventricle during diastole appears to exist. Over time, fibrosis may occur, further contributing to the poor compliance of the ventricle. As the left ventricle does not relax during early diastole, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increases, further increasing left atrial pressure in late diastole. The exact determinants of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction have not been well studied; possibly, the abnormality is governed by abnormal calcium kinetics.

The central nervous system

Long-standing hypertension may manifest as hemorrhagic and atheroembolic stroke or encephalopathy. Both the high systolic and diastolic pressures are harmful; a diastolic pressure of more than 100 mm Hg and a systolic pressure of more than 160 mm Hg have led to a significant incidence of strokes. Other cerebrovascular manifestations of complicated hypertension include hypertensive hemorrhage, hypertensive encephalopathy, lacunar-type infarctions, and dementia.

Renal disease

Despite widespread treatment of hypertension in the United States, the incidence of end-stage renal disease continues to rise. The explanation for this rise may be concomitant diabetes mellitus, the progressive nature of hypertensive renal disease despite therapy, or a failure to reduce blood pressure to a protective level. A reduction in renal blood flow in conjunction with elevated afferent glomerular arteriolar resistance increases glomerular hydrostatic pressure secondary to efferent glomerular arteriolar constriction. The result is glomerular hyperfiltration, followed by development of glomerulosclerosis and further impairment of renal function.

Two studies have demonstrated that a reduction in blood pressure may result in improved renal function. Therefore, earlier detection of hypertensive nephrosclerosis using means to detect microalbuminuria and aggressive therapeutic interventions, particularly with ACE inhibitor drugs, may prevent progression to end-stage renal disease.

Nephrosclerosis is one of the possible complications of long-standing hypertension. The risk of hypertension-induced end-stage renal disease is higher in black patients, even when the blood pressure is under good control. Furthermore, patients with diabetic nephropathy who are hypertensive are also at high risk for developing end-stage renal disease. The renin-angiotensin system activity influences the progression of renal disease. Angiotensin II acts at both the afferent and the efferent arterioles, but more so on the efferent arteriole, which leads to an increase of the intraglomerular pressure. The excess glomerular pressure leads to microalbuminuria. Reducing intraglomerular pressure using an ACE inhibitor has been shown to be beneficial in patients with diabetic nephropathy, even in those who are not hypertensive. The beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on the progression of renal insufficiency in patients who are nondiabetic is less clear.

Hypertension in renal disease

Hypertension is commonly observed in patients with kidney disease. Volume expansion is the main cause of hypertension in patients with glomerular disease (nephrotic and nephritic syndrome). Hypertension in patients with vascular disease is the result of the activation of the renin-angiotensin system, which is often secondary to ischemia. Most patients with chronic renal failure are hypertensive (80-90%). The combination of volume expansion and the activation of the renin-angiotensin system is believed to be the main factor behind hypertension in patients with chronic renal failure.

Metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is an assemblage of metabolic risk factors that directly promote the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia are the most widely recognized metabolic risk factors. The combination of these risk factors leads to a prothrombotic, proinflammatory state in humans and identifies individuals who are at elevated risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

The predominant underlying risk factors for the metabolic syndrome appear to be abdominal obesity and insulin resistance. Other associated conditions are physical inactivity, aging, hormonal imbalance, and atherogenic diet. Insulin resistance, an essential cause of the metabolic syndrome, predisposes to hyperglycemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Individuals who insulin resistant may not be clinically obese, but they commonly have an abnormal fat distribution that is characterized by predominant upper body fat. Upper body obesity can occur either intraperitoneally (visceral fat) or subcutaneously, both of which correlate strongly with insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome.

The rising prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is secondary to the increasing burden of obesity in our society. The adipose tissue in people who are obese is insulin resistant, raises nonesterified fatty acid levels, alters hepatic metabolism, and produces several adipokines. These include increased production of inflammatory cytokines, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and other bioactive products, while the synthesis of potentially protective adipokine, adiponectin, is reduced. Recently, this syndrome has been noted to be associated with a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation. Although the metabolic syndrome unequivocally predisposes to type 2 diabetes mellitus, this syndrome is multidimensional risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Frequency

United States

Forty-three million people are estimated to have hypertension, defined by a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or greater and/or diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater or defined as those taking antihypertensive medications. The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension varies from 18-32%, according to data from the National Health Examination Surveys. According to the National Center for Health Statistic Surveys, the awareness for hypertension increased from 53% in 1960-1962 to 89% in 1988-1991. The percentage of patients engaged in hypertension treatment increased from 35% to 79% during this period.

  • The National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP) has reported estimates of hypertension prevalence in United States. The hypertension survey was conducted from 1989-1994, and actual blood pressure and self-reported information was used. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure equal to or more than 140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure equal or more than 90 mm Hg, or taking medication for hypertension. The data estimated 43.3 million adults with hypertension in November 1991. The prevalence according to age group, sex, and race is shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Prevalence (%) of Hypertension in the United States, 1989-1994*

Open table in new window

Table
Age GroupsAll RacesWhiteBlack
Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)
18-242.64.60.72.54.60.52.64.11.4
25-345.48.42.44.98.11.68.210.66.2
35-4413.016.010.211.314.38.525.929.522.9
45-5427.630.025.225.829.122.646.944.348.8
55-6443.744.243.242.143.041.460.058.063.0
65-7459.655.862.758.654.961.771.065.275.6
75+ 70.360.576.269.759.076.175.571.377.9
Total23.423.523.323.223.423.128.127.928.2
Age GroupsAll RacesWhiteBlack
Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)Men (%)Women (%)Total (%)
18-242.64.60.72.54.60.52.64.11.4
25-345.48.42.44.98.11.68.210.66.2
35-4413.016.010.211.314.38.525.929.522.9
45-5427.630.025.225.829.122.646.944.348.8
55-6443.744.243.242.143.041.460.058.063.0
65-7459.655.862.758.654.961.771.065.275.6
75+ 70.360.576.269.759.076.175.571.377.9
Total23.423.523.323.223.423.128.127.928.2

*Includes racial/ethnic groups not shown separately because of small sample sizes

  • A 2005 survey in the United States found that in the population aged 20 years or older, an estimated 41.9 million men and 27.8 million women have prehypertension, 12.8 million men and 12.2 million women have stage 1 hypertension, and 4.1 million men and 6.9 million women have stage 2 hypertension. Age- and sex-adjusted rates of prehypertension and stage I hypertension increased among non-Hispanic white, African American, and Hispanic persons between 1988-1992 and 1999-2000. Age- and sex-adjusted rates of stage 2 hypertension decreased among non-Hispanic whites between 1988-1992 and 1999-2000, but they were unchanged for African American and Hispanic persons.

International

National health surveys in various countries have shown a high prevalence of poor control of hypertension. These studies have reported that prevalence of hypertension is 22% in Canada, of which 16% is controlled; 26.3% in Egypt, of which 8% is controlled; and 13.6% in China, of which 3% is controlled. Hypertension is a worldwide epidemic; in many countries, 50% of the population older than 60 years has hypertension. Overall, approximately 20% of the world's adults are estimated to have hypertension. The 20% prevalence is for hypertension defined as blood pressure in excess of 140/90 mm Hg. The prevalence dramatically increases in patients older than 60 years.

Mortality/Morbidity

  • In the Framingham Heart Study, the age-adjusted risk of congestive heart failure was 2.3 times higher in men and 3 times higher in women when highest blood pressure was compared to the lowest. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) data showed that the relative risk for coronary heart disease mortality varied from 2.3-6.9 times higher for persons with mild-to-severe hypertension compared to persons with normal blood pressure.
  • The relative risk for stroke ranged from 3.6-19.2. The population-attributable risk percentage for coronary artery disease varied from 2.3-25.6%, whereas the population-attributable risk for stroke ranged from 6.8-40%.

Race

Blacks have a higher prevalence and incidence of hypertension than whites. The prevalence of hypertension was increased by 50% in African Americans. In Mexican Americans, the prevalence and incidence of hypertension is similar to or lower than in whites. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III reported an age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension at 20.6% in Mexican Americans and 23.3% in non-Hispanic whites.

  • Are there ethnic differences in the pathogenesis of hypertension, and do these differences influence the choice of treatment? To understand ethnic influence, an understanding of the renin angiotensin system is essential. Renin secretion is suppressed when the kidney detects that the amount of sodium excretion is increased; thus, a clue to the excess sodium in the circulation. Black people tend to develop hypertension at an earlier age and have lower rennin activity; target organ damage also differs in black people from that in white people.
  • Most studies in the United Kingdom and the United States report a higher prevalence and lower awareness of hypertension in black people than in white people. Mortality from hypertension in African-Caribbean–born people is 3.5 times the national rate; similar data have been published for African American citizens. Strokes are more common in black people, but coronary heart disease is more common in Asians. Both groups have a higher incidence of chronic renal failure than white people, but this is more due to hypertension in black people and diabetes in Asians.
  • Black people have a poorer response to treatment with ACE inhibitors compared to white people; the evidence for beta-blockers being less effective in black people is also clear. However, diuretics are more effective at a young age in black people.

Sex

The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was 34%, 25.4%, and 23.2% for men and 31%, 21%, and 21.6% for women among African Americans, whites, and Mexican Americans, respectively. In the NHANES III study, the prevalence of hypertension was 12% for white men and 5% for white women aged 18-49 years. However, the age-related blood pressure rise for women exceeds that of men. The prevalence of hypertension was reported at 50% for white men and 55% for white women aged 70 years or older.

Age

A progressive rise in blood pressure with increasing age is observed. The third NHANES survey reported that the prevalence of hypertension grows significantly with increasing age in all sex and race groups. The age-specific prevalence was 3.3% in white men (aged 18-29 y); this increased to 13.2% in the group aged 30-39 years. The prevalence further increased to 22% in the group aged 40-49 years, to 37.5% in the group aged 50-59 years, and to 51% in the group aged 60-74 years. In another study, the incidence of hypertension appeared to increase approximately 5% for each 10-year interval of age. Age-related hypertension appears to be predominantly systolic rather than diastolic. The systolic blood pressure rises into the eighth or ninth decade, while the diastolic blood pressure remains constant or declines after age 40 years.1

Clinical

History

  • Following the documentation of hypertension, which is confirmed after an elevated blood pressure, properly measured, has been documented on at least 3 separate occasions (based on the average of 2 or more readings taken at each of 2 or more visits after initial screening), a detailed history should extract the following information:
    • Extent of target organ damage
    • Assessment of patients' cardiovascular risk status
    • Exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension
  • Patients may have undiagnosed hypertension for years without having had their blood pressure checked. Therefore, a careful history of end organ damage should be obtained.
  • A history of cardiovascular risk factors includes hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, and tobacco use (including chewing tobacco).
  • Obtain a history of over-the-counter medication use, current and previous unsuccessful antihypertensive medication trials, and ethanol intake.
  • The historical and physical findings that suggest the possibility of secondary hypertension are a history of known renal disease, abdominal masses, anemia, and urochrome pigmentation.
  • A history of sweating, labile hypertension, and palpitations suggests the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
  • A history of cold or heat tolerance, sweating, lack of energy, and bradycardia or tachycardia may indicate hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.
  • A history of weakness suggests hyperaldosteronism. Abdominal bruit suggests the possibility of renal artery stenosis. Absence of femoral pulses suggests coarctation of aorta.
  • Kidney stones raise the possibility of hyperparathyroidism. The presence of papilledema and other neurologic signs raises the possibility of increased intracranial pressure. A history of drug ingestion, including oral contraceptives, licorice, and sympathomimetics, should be obtained.

Physical

An accurate measurement of blood pressure is the key to diagnosis. Several determinations should be made over a period of several weeks.

At any given visit, an average of 3 blood pressure readings taken 2 minutes apart using a mercury manometer is preferable. Blood pressure should be measured in both the supine and sitting positions, auscultating with the bell of the stethoscope. On the first visit, blood pressure should be checked in both arms and in one leg to avoid missing the diagnosis of coarctation of aorta or subclavian artery stenosis.

As the improper cuff size may influence blood pressure measurement, a wider cuff is preferable, particularly if the patient's arm circumference exceeds 30 cm.

The patient should rest quietly for at least 5 minutes before the measurement.

Although somewhat controversial, the common practice is to document phase V (a disappearance of all sounds) of Korotkoff sounds as the diastolic pressure.

  • A funduscopic evaluation of the eyes should be performed to detect any evidence of hypertensive retinopathy. These are flame-shaped hemorrhages and cotton wool exudates.
  • Palpation of all peripheral pulses should be performed.
  • Look for renal artery bruit over the upper abdomen; the presence of a unilateral bruit with both a systolic and diastolic component suggests renal artery stenosis.
  • A careful cardiac examination is performed to evaluate signs of LVH. These include displacement of apex, a sustained and enlarged apical impulse, and the presence of an S4. Occasionally, a tambour S2 is heard with aortic root dilatation.

Causes

  • Primary or essential hypertension (90-95%)
  • Secondary hypertension: A small percentage of patients (2-10%) have a secondary cause. The following is a list of secondary causes of hypertension:
    • Renal (2.5-6%)
      • Renal parenchymal disease
      • Polycystic kidney disease
      • Urinary tract obstruction
      • Renin-producing tumor
      • Liddle syndrome
    • Renovascular hypertension (0.2-4%)
    • Vascular
      • Coarctation of aorta
      • Vasculitis
      • Collagen vascular disease
    • Endocrine (1-2%) - Oral contraceptives
    • Adrenal
      • Primary aldosteronism
      • Cushing syndrome
      • Pheochromocytoma
      • Congenital adrenal hyperplasia
    • Hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism
    • Hypercalcemia
    • Hyperparathyroidism
    • Acromegaly
    • Neurogenic
      • Brain tumor
      • Bulbar poliomyelitis
      • Intracranial hypertension
    • Pregnancy-induced hypertension
    • Drugs and toxins
      • Alcohol
      • Cocaine
      • Cyclosporin
      • Erythropoietin
      • Adrenergic medications

More on Hypertension

Overview: Hypertension
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Hypertension
Treatment & Medication: Hypertension
Follow-up: Hypertension
References

References

  1. Cornoni-Huntley J, LaCroix AZ, Havlik RJ. Race and sex differentials in the impact of hypertension in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med. Apr 1989;149(4):780-8. [Medline].

  2. Svetkey LP, Moore TJ, Simons-Morton DG, Appel LJ, Bray GA, Sacks FM, et al. Angiotensinogen genotype and blood pressure response in the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) study. J Hypertens. Nov 2001;19(11):1949-56. [Medline].

  3. Dunnick NR, Sfakianakis GN. Screening for renovascular hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am. May 1991;29(3):497-510. [Medline].

  4. Svetkey LP, Kadir S, Dunnick NR. Similar prevalence of renovascular hypertension in selected blacks and whites. Hypertension. May 1991;17(5):678-83. [Medline].

  5. Olin JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, DeAnna S, Grubb M, Childs MB. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med. Jun 1 1995;122(11):833-8. [Medline].

  6. Abergel E, Chatellier G, Battaglia C, Menard J. Can echocardiography identify mildly hypertensive patients at high risk, left untreated based on current guidelines?. J Hypertens. Jun 1999;17(6):817-24. [Medline].

  7. Alderman MH. JNC 7: brief summary and critique. Clin Exp Hypertens. Oct-Nov 2004;26(7-8):753-61. [Medline].

  8. Alderman MH, Madhavan S, Ooi WL, Cohen H, Sealey JE, Laragh JH. Association of the renin-sodium profile with the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with hypertension. N Engl J Med. Apr 18 1991;324(16):1098-104. [Medline].

  9. ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. Apr 19 2000;283(15):1967-75. [Medline].

  10. Bianchi S, Bigazzi R, Campese VM. Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension: significance, pathophysiology, and therapeutic implications. Am J Kidney Dis. Dec 1999;34(6):973-95. [Medline].

  11. Boissel JP, Collet JP, Lion L, Ducruet T, Moleur P, Luciani J, et al. A randomized comparison of the effect of four antihypertensive monotherapies on the subjective quality of life in previously untreated asymptomatic patients: field trial in general practice. The OCAPI Study Group. Optimiser le Choix d'un Anti-hypertenseur de Première Intention. J Hypertens. Sep 1995;13(9):1059-67. [Medline].

  12. Brown MJ. Hypertension and ethnic group. BMJ. Apr 8 2006;332(7545):833-6. [Medline].

  13. Brunner HR, Menard J, Waeber B, Burnier M, Biollaz J, Nussberger J, et al. Treating the individual hypertensive patient: considerations on dose, sequential monotherapy and drug combinations. J Hypertens. Jan 1990;8(1):3-11; discussion 13-9. [Medline].

  14. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. Dec 2003;42(6):1206-52. [Medline].

  15. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. May 21 2003;289(19):2560-72. [Medline].

  16. Choudhri AH, Cleland JG, Rowlands PC, Tran TL, McCarty M, al-Kutoubi MA. Unsuspected renal artery stenosis in peripheral vascular disease. BMJ. Nov 24 1990;301(6762):1197-8. [Medline].

  17. Chrysant SG, Fagan T, Glazer R, Kriegman A. Effects of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide, given alone and in low- and high-dose combinations, on blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Arch Fam Med. Jan 1996;5(1):17-24; discussion 25. [Medline].

  18. Croog SH, Levine S, Testa MA, Brown B, Bulpitt CJ, Jenkins CD, et al. The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life. N Engl J Med. Jun 26 1986;314(26):1657-64. [Medline].

  19. Culleton BF, Larson MG, Kannel WB, Levy D. Serum uric acid and risk for cardiovascular disease and death: the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. Jul 6 1999;131(1):7-13. [Medline].

  20. Cummings DM, Amadio P Jr, Nelson L, Fitzgerald JM. The role of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of essential hypertension. Arch Intern Med. Feb 1991;151(2):250-9. [Medline].

  21. Dickerson JE, Hingorani AD, Ashby MJ, Palmer CR, Brown MJ. Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes. Lancet. Jun 12 1999;353(9169):2008-13. [Medline].

  22. Duprez DA. Role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in vascular remodeling and inflammation: a clinical review. J Hypertens. Jun 2006;24(6):983-91. [Medline].

  23. Epstein M. Calcium antagonists and renal disease. Kidney Int. 54(5):1771-84. [Medline].

  24. Epstein M, Bakris G. Newer approaches to antihypertensive therapy. Use of fixed-dose combination therapy. Arch Intern Med. 156(17):1969-78. [Medline].

  25. Fahey T, Schroeder K, Ebrahim S. Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD005182. [Medline].

  26. Gradman AH, Cutler NR, Davis PJ, Robbins JA, Weiss RJ, Wood BC. Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension. Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group. Am J Cardiol. Feb 15 1997;79(4):431-5. [Medline].

  27. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. Oct 25 2005;112(17):2735-52. [Medline].

  28. Hansson L, Hedner T, Lund-Johansen P, Kjeldsen SE, Lindholm LH, Syvertsen JO, et al. Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study. Lancet. Jul 29 2000;356(9227):359-65. [Medline].

  29. Hebert PR, Moser M, Mayer J, Glynn RJ, Hennekens CH. Recent evidence on drug therapy of mild to moderate hypertension and decreased risk of coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. Mar 8 1993;153(5):578-81. [Medline].

  30. Jackson R, Barham P, Bills J, Birch T, McLennan L, MacMahon S, et al. Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document. BMJ. Jul 10 1993;307(6896):107-10. [Medline].

  31. Kaplan NM. Calcium entry blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Current status and future prospects. JAMA. 262(6):817-23. [Medline].

  32. Kaplan NM, Gifford RW Jr. Choice of initial therapy for hypertension. JAMA. May 22-29 1996;275(20):1577-80. [Medline].

  33. Kendall MJ, Lynch KP, Hjalmarson A, Kjekshus J. Beta-blockers and sudden cardiac death. Ann Intern Med. Sep 1 1995;123(5):358-67. [Medline].

  34. Khan NA, McAlister FA, Lewanczuk RZ, Touyz RM, Padwal R, Rabkin SW, et al. The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part II - therapy. Can J Cardiol. Jun 2005;21(8):657-72. [Medline].

  35. Khoury AF, Kaplan NM. Alpha-blocker therapy of hypertension. An unfulfilled promise. JAMA. Jul 17 1991;266(3):394-8. [Medline].

  36. Kugler J, Schmitz N, Seelbach H, Rollnik J, Kruskemper GM. Rise in systolic blood pressure during sphygmomanometry depends on the maximum inflation pressure of the arm cuff. J Hypertens. Jul 1994;12(7):825-9. [Medline].

  37. Lancet. Calcium antagonist caution. Lancet. 337(8746):885-6. [Medline].

  38. MacMillan LB, Hein L, Smith MS, Piascik MT, Limbird LE. Central hypotensive effects of the alpha2a-adrenergic receptor subtype. Science. Aug 9 1996;273(5276):801-3. [Medline].

  39. Materson BJ, Reda DJ. Correction: single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. N Engl J Med. 330(23):1689. [Medline].

  40. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, et al. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men. A comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. N Engl J Med. Apr 1 1993;328(13):914-21. [Medline].

  41. MRFIT. Mortality after 10 1/2 years for hypertensive participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Circulation. 82(5):1616-28. [Medline].

  42. Narkiewicz K. Diagnosis and management of hypertension in obesity. Obes Rev. May 2006;7(2):155-62. [Medline].

  43. Neaton JD, Grimm RH Jr, Prineas RJ, Stamler J, Grandits GA, Elmer PJ, et al. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study. Final results. Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study Research Group. JAMA. Aug 11 1993;270(6):713-24. [Medline].

  44. Nicholson JP, Resnick LM, Laragh JH. The antihypertensive effect of verapamil at extremes of dietary sodium intake. Ann Intern Med. Sep 1987;107(3):329-34. [Medline].

  45. Oster JR, Epstein M. Use of centrally acting sympatholytic agents in the management of hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 151(8):1638-44. [Medline].

  46. Pickering TG, James GD, Boddie C, Harshfield GA, Blank S, Laragh JH. How common is white coat hypertension?. JAMA. Jan 8 1988;259(2):225-8. [Medline].

  47. Pollare T, Lithell H, Berne C. A comparison of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide and captopril on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension. N Engl J Med. 321(13):868-73. [Medline].

  48. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Divani AA. Prevalence and trends of prehypertension and hypertension in United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1976 to 2000. Med Sci Monit. Sep 2005;11(9):CR403-9. [Medline].

  49. Radack K, Deck C. Beta-adrenergic blocker therapy does not worsen intermittent claudication in subjects with peripheral arterial disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. Sep 1991;151(9):1769-76. [Medline].

  50. Redon J, Campos C, Narciso ML, Rodicio JL, Pascual JM, Ruilope LM. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension. Feb 1998;31(2):712-8. [Medline].

  51. Sahloul MZ, al-Kiek R, Ivanovich P, Mujais SK. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and antihypertensives. Cooperative malfeasance. Nephron. 1990;56(4):345-52. [Medline].

  52. Schmieder RE, Martus P, Klingbeil A. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. A meta-analysis of randomized double-blind studies. JAMA. 275(19):1507-13. [Medline].

  53. Setaro JF, Black HR. Refractory hypertension. N Engl J Med. Aug 20 1992;327(8):543-7. [Medline].

  54. Singer DR, Markandu ND, Sugden AL, Miller MA, MacGregor GA. Sodium restriction in hypertensive patients treated with a converting enzyme inhibitor and a thiazide. Hypertension. Jun 1991;17(6 Pt 1):798-803. [Medline].

  55. Siscovick DS, Raghunathan TE, Psaty BM, Koepsell TD, Wicklund KG, Lin X, et al. Diuretic therapy for hypertension and the risk of primary cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. Jun 30 1994;330(26):1852-7. [Medline].

  56. Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhager WH, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators. Lancet. Sep 13 1997;350(9080):757-64. [Medline].

  57. Swales JD. First line treatment in hypertension. BMJ. 301(6762):1172-3. [Medline].

  58. Townsend RR, Holland OB. Combination of converting enzyme inhibitor with diuretic for the treatment of hypertension. Arch Intern Med. Jun 1990;150(6):1175-83. [Medline].

  59. Veteran's Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive agents. Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg. JAMA. 213(7):1143-52. [Medline].

  60. Weber MA. Hypertension treatment and implications of recent cardiovascular outcome trials. J Hypertens Suppl. Apr 2006;24(2):S37-44. [Medline].

  61. Williams GH. Converting-enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension. N Engl J Med. 319(23):1517-25. [Medline].

  62. Wolz M, Cutler J, Roccella EJ, Rohde F, Thom T, Burt V. Statement from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program: prevalence of hypertension. Am J Hypertens. Jan 2000;13(1 Pt 1):103-4. [Medline].

  63. World Health Organization. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens. 17(2):151-83. [Medline].

  64. Yakovlevitch M, Black HR. Resistant hypertension in a tertiary care clinic. Arch Intern Med. Sep 1991;151(9):1786-92. [Medline].

  65. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. Jan 20 2000;342(3):145-53. [Medline].

Further Reading

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC, Professor and Head, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba; Site Director, Respiratory Medicine, St. Boniface General Hospital
Sat Sharma, MD, FRCPC is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Thoracic Society, Canadian Medical Association, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Royal Society of Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and World Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Claude Kortas, MD, Program Director, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, Canada
Claude Kortas, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Nephrology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Ontario Medical Association, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

L Michael Prisant, MD, FACC, Director of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia
L Michael Prisant, MD, FACC is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Clinical Pharmacology, American College of Forensic Examiners, American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, and American Medical Association
Disclosure: Abbott Grant/research funds Investigator; Boehringer-Ingelheim Grant/research funds Other; Eli Lilly None Investigator; Novartis None Investigator; Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Forest, Gilead, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Novartis, Oscient, Sciele, SunTech Medical Consulting fee Consulting; Abbott, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck, Merck/Schering-Plough, Novartis, Oscient Honoraria Speaking and teaching

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

George R Aronoff, MD, Director, Professor, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Section of Nephrology, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine
George R Aronoff, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Federation for Medical Research, American Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, and National Kidney Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine
Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Osteopathic Internists, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, International Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, Renal Physicians Association, and West Virginia State Medical Association
Disclosure: Abbott Grant/research funds Speaking and teaching; Genzyme Honoraria Consulting; Roche Honoraria Consulting

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.