eMedicine Specialties > Nephrology > Drug- and Nephrotoxin-Associated Kidney Disorders

Lead Nephropathy: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Pranay Kathuria, MD, MBBS, FACP, FASN, Chief, Section of Nephrology, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine at Tulsa
Coauthor(s): Paresh Jadav, MD, Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Washington School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Feb 5, 2008

Differential Diagnoses

Light Chain-Associated Renal Disorders
Nephritis, Interstitial
Nephritis, Radiation
Nephropathy, Uric Acid
Nephrosclerosis
Toxicity, Arsenic

Workup

Laboratory Studies

  • The diagnosis of lead nephropathy requires a high index of suspicion. Most important is obtaining a detailed history that includes occupational or environmental lead exposure, followed by the measurement of total body burden of lead. In 1973, Emmerson suggested the following diagnostic criteria for chronic lead nephropathy: (1) features of long-standing, slowly progressive chronic kidney disease; (2) moderate-to-considerable contraction of both kidneys; (3) definitive evidence of excessive past lead exposure; and (4) exclusion of alternative causes for chronic kidney disease.
  • CBC count
    • A CBC count may serve to identify lead suppression of hematopoiesis and anemia of chronic kidney disease.
    • Peripheral blood smear analysis may show a hypochromic microcytic anemia and basophilic stippling in red blood cells.
  • Chemistries
    • Acute lead nephrotoxicity is associated with hypophosphatemia and non–gap metabolic acidosis secondary to Fanconi syndrome and occasionally even hypocalcemia.
    • Chronic lead nephrotoxicity causes loss of kidney function and consequent elevated blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. Hyperuricemia is common.
  • Heme enzymes
    • Erythrocyte aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) activity is strongly inhibited by lead because lead oxidizes ALAD's sulfhydryl group and removes zinc from its active site. Consequently, ALAD activity levels are decreased in persons with lead poisoning. Iron deficiency can increase ALAD activity and may mask the lead-induced inhibition of ALAD activity at least in the initial stages; thus, determining iron reserves before examining ALAD activity levels is important.

      • Uremic patients, besides those with lead exposure, may also have lower ALAD activity. The ratio of ALAD to restored ALAD has been suggested as a superior marker of chronic lead exposure.
      • Erythrocyte ALAD levels can be restored by replacing the lead with zinc and by the negative sulfhydryl donor, dithiothreitol. Restored ALAD is increased following exposure to lead, presumably as a compensatory effect. In a 2002 study, Fontanellas et al found that patients with a history of chronic lead exposure and those with renal failure and positive EDTA chelation test results showed a marked reduction in the ratio of ALAD to restored ALAD (0.16 and 0.19, respectively). In contrast, normal controls and patients with chronic kidney disease and normal lead excretion (ratio 0.5 and 0.47) had higher ratios.
      • Inhibition of ALAD results in an increase in blood and urinary concentrations of aminolevulinic acid. The urinary excretion of aminolevulinic acid has also been widely used as a measure of the biologic effect of lead in workers who are occupationally exposed.
    • Similarly, heme enzymes, such as zinc-protoporphyrin and free erythrocyte protoporphyrin, are known to be altered by lead and have been used in the past for lead detection. Results from these tests reflect lead exposure in the previous 3 months (approximate life of a red blood cell) and cannot be used to assess the body burden of lead. Furthermore, erythrocyte protoporphyrin levels are elevated in persons with iron deficiency anemia.
  • Urinary markers
    • Chronic lead nephropathy occurs as a progressive interstitial nephropathy, which is difficult to diagnose at an early stage. Urinary analysis shows mild-to-moderate proteinuria. Blood urea nitrogen levels, serum creatinine values, and the GFR are abnormal only in late stages of nephropathy, when the changes are already irreversible.
    • A number of potential markers of early kidney changes have been studied in individuals exposed to lead. Of the early markers of nephrotoxicity, urinary N -acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase excretion has been shown to increase in early lead nephropathy. However, more recent studies have questioned its usefulness as a marker of chronic lead nephropathy, reporting that the elevation in urinary N -acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase activity may be an overly sensitive indicator and the rise could be secondary to concomitant cadmium exposure and even may be secondary to a sharp increase in lead burden, rather than cumulative exposure of lead.
    • The renal excretion of 6-keto-prostaglandin factor 1-alpha is reduced in patients exposed to lead, and excretion of thromboxane is enhanced.
  • Blood lead level
    • In the United States, the average blood lead level in unexposed individuals is 3 mcg/dL. Medical surveillance is needed for children when their blood level exceeds 10 mcg/dL.
    • Acute lead poisoning is recognized when classic symptoms of acute intoxication are present and the blood lead level is elevated (>40 mcg/dL). When the blood lead level exceeds 150 mcg/dL, encephalopathy is common and may be accompanied by fatal seizures. However, blood lead levels correlate best with recent exposure, and a normal value does not exclude remote exposure with an increased body burden of lead. Thus, blood lead levels are not useful for investigating chronic lead nephropathy.
    • The best measure for assessing the total accumulation of lead in the body is CaNa2 EDTA lead mobilization test.
  • CaNa2 EDTA lead mobilization test
    • The test is performed by administering 2 g of CaNa2 EDTA intramuscularly in 2 divided doses 12 hours apart or 1 g intravenously and collecting urine for 24 hours. Patients with kidney disease should collect urine over 3-6 days. EDTA is a chelation agent for lead sequestered in body storage sites and mobilizes it for renal excretion in the form of lead-EDTA chelate. Individuals without any unusual prior exposure to lead would excrete less than 650 mcg of lead over the collection period. Cumulative excretion greater than this level is indicative of excessive lead burden.
    • In children, a dose of 30-50 mg/kg of CaNa2 EDTA is administered intramuscularly or intravenously and urine is collected over 8 hours. A positive mobilization test result is a ratio of the dose of EDTA administered (in mg) to the quantity of lead excreted (in mcg) of greater than 0.6.

Imaging Studies

  • Kidney ultrasound: Kidneys are contracted with chronic lead nephropathy.
  • X-ray fluorescence
    • X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is a safe, noninvasive, and reliable technique to measure lead in the skeleton. XRF works by emitting x-rays at bone to activate electrons in different electron shells. Lead atoms respond to x-ray excitation by fluorescing, with greater fluorescence associated with higher concentrations of lead. The photons are collected in a detector and counted, yielding an estimate of bone lead.
    • Two types of XRF are used. L-line XRF stimulates electrons in the L electron shell, whereas K-line XRF acts only on electrons in the K shell. The L-line XRF uses weakly penetrating radiation, and measurements reflect lead in the subperiosteal bone, which is a mobilizable compartment of lead. Accurate calibration is somewhat difficult with this technique. The latter technique permits detection of lead molecules from the full thickness of bone and allows accurate assessment of the lead-to-calcium ratio. The exposure to radiation in this technique is much less compared with that of a conventional x-ray film.
    • The XRF technique to determine skeletal lead stores has been proposed as an epidemiological tool to help screen large populations because the CaNa2 EDTA mobilization test is too cumbersome, invasive, and expensive to be used in the general population.

Procedures

  • Bone lead measurements
    • More than 90% of the total burden of lead is in bone, with 70% in dense bone. Therefore, a direct measurement of dense bone lead content can be an accurate diagnostic test.
    • In 1988, Wedeen et al suggested that iliac crest bone lead-to-calcium ratios exceeding 100 X 10-6 and transiliac lead-to-calcium ratios exceeding 140 X 10-6 are consistent with the diagnosis of lead nephropathy. However, data from Antwerp, Belgium, have demonstrated that the chelation test provides as accurate an estimate of body lead burden when compared with transiliac biopsy results. Thus, bone biopsies are not indicated for the diagnosis of lead poisoning.
  • Kidney biopsy: Kidney biopsy is not needed for diagnosis. Results may show nonspecific changes of a chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis.

Histologic Findings

The potential effects of lead extend from reversible proximal tubular changes to interstitial nephritis and chronic kidney disease.

Acute lead nephropathy

The characteristic histological finding is the presence of acid-fast nuclear inclusion bodies in the proximal tubular cells, which are lead-protein complexes. Three types of characteristic changes in the nuclei are described: (1) lead-induced nuclear inclusion bodies, (2) clumped granular chromatin, and (3) pseudo inclusions or nuclear invagination of cytoplasmic contents.

Other ultrastructural changes include swollen mitochondria in the tubular lining cells, with distorted cristae. Endoplasmic reticula are swollen and increased in number. Lysosomes are often numerous, some of which may have a laminated appearance and may contain dense bodies of varying sizes. Brush border structures are distorted, with a reduced number of microvilli or with swollen microvilli. Most of these histopathologic changes are reversible with treatment.

Chronic lead nephropathy

Changes in chronic lead nephropathy are nonspecific. Macroscopically, kidneys appear contracted and have a granular surface. The cut surface shows general loss of cortical tissue, corticomedullary demarcation, and vascular markings. The pyramids are small but intact.

Upon histopathologic analysis, the tissue shows varying degrees of relatively acellular interstitial nephritis. Areas of dilated tubules alternate with atrophic tubules, rendering a granular appearance to the kidney surface. A large proportion of glomeruli are lost without leaving a trace, which is a characteristic feature. The remaining glomeruli are irregularly distributed, some with periglomerular fibrosis.

Glomerular cells have nonspecific abnormalities, such as occasional swelling and distortion of organelles in the cytoplasm, but have normal basement membranes. The glomeruli also show adhesive glomerulitis, with damage varying from single adhesions to complete obliteration of the capsular space. The inclusion bodies described in acute lead nephropathy are usually absent. The vessels show arteriolar nephrosclerotic changes. Immunofluorescence reveals a variety of immunoglobulin deposits in glomerular capillaries and tubular basement membranes, suggesting a role for immune mechanisms.

More on Lead Nephropathy

Overview: Lead Nephropathy
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Lead Nephropathy
Treatment & Medication: Lead Nephropathy
Follow-up: Lead Nephropathy
Multimedia: Lead Nephropathy
References

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Screening for elevated blood lead levels. Pediatrics. Jun 1998;101(6):1072-8. [Medline].

  2. Batuman V. Lead nephropathy, gout, and hypertension. Am J Med Sci. Apr 1993;305(4):241-7. [Medline].

  3. Bennett WM. Lead nephropathy. Kidney Int. Aug 1985;28(2):212-20. [Medline].

  4. Brewster UC, Perazella MA. A review of chronic lead intoxication: an unrecognized cause of chronic kidney disease. Am J Med Sci. Jun 2004;327(6):341-7. [Medline].

  5. Buchet JP, Roels H, Bernard A, Lauwerys R. Assessment of renal function of workers exposed to inorganic lead, calcium or mercury vapor. J Occup Med. Nov 1980;22(11):741-50. [Medline].

  6. Cardenas A, Roels H, Bernard AM, et al. Markers of early renal changes induced by industrial pollutants. II. Application to workers exposed to lead. Br J Ind Med. Jan 1993;50(1):28-36. [Medline].

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Blood lead levels in young children--United States and selected states, 1996-1999. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Dec 22 2000;49(50):1133-7. [Medline].

  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: blood lead levels--United States, 1991-1994. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Feb 21 1997;46(7):141-6. [Medline].

  9. Cheng Y, Schwartz J, Sparrow D, et al. Bone lead and blood lead levels in relation to baseline blood pressure and the prospective development of hypertension: the Normative Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol. Jan 15 2001;153(2):164-71. [Medline].

  10. Cheng Y, Willett WC, Schwartz J, et al. Relation of nutrition to bone lead and blood lead levels in middle-aged to elderly men. The Normative Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol. Jun 15 1998;147(12):1162-74. [Medline].

  11. Chia KS, Jeyaratnam J, Lee J, et al. Lead-induced nephropathy: relationship between various biological exposure indices and early markers of nephrotoxicity. Am J Ind Med. Jun 1995;27(6):883-95. [Medline].

  12. Chisolm JJ Jr. BAL, EDTA, DMSA and DMPS in the treatment of lead poisoning in children. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1992;30(4):493-504. [Medline].

  13. Chisolm JJ Jr. The road to primary prevention of lead toxicity in children. Pediatrics. Mar 2001;107(3):581-3. [Medline].

  14. Chow KM, Liu ZC, Szeto CC. Lead nephropathy: early leads from descriptive studies. Intern Med J. Oct 2006;36(10):678-82.

  15. Clark CS, Thuppil V, Clark R, et al. Lead in paint and soil in Karnataka and Gujarat, India. J Occup Environ Hyg. Jan 2005;2(1):38-44.

  16. Craswell PW, Price J, Boyle PD, et al. Chronic lead nephropathy in Queensland: alternative methods of diagnosis. Aust N Z J Med. Feb 1986;16(1):11-9. [Medline].

  17. Ekong EB, Jaar BG, Weaver VM. Lead-related nephrotoxicity: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Kidney Int. Dec 2006;70(12):2074-84.

  18. Emmerson BT. Chronic lead nephropathy. Kidney Int. Jul 1973;4(1):1-5. [Medline].

  19. Fels LM, Herbort C, Pergande M, et al. Nephron target sites in chronic exposure to lead. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(12):1740-6. [Medline].

  20. Fontanellas A, Navarro S, Moran-Jimenez MJ, et al. Erythrocyte aminolevulinate dehydratase activity as a lead marker in patients with chronic renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 40(1):43-50. [Medline].

  21. Gardella C. Lead exposure in pregnancy: a review of the literature and argument for routine prenatal screening. Obstet Gynecol Surv. Apr 2001;56(4):231-8. [Medline].

  22. Gerhardsson L, Chettle DR, Englyst V, et al. Kidney effects in long term exposed lead smelter workers. Br J Ind Med. Mar 1992;49(3):186-92. [Medline].

  23. Greenberg A, Parkinson DK, Fetterolf DE, et al. Effects of elevated lead and cadmium burdens on renal function and calcium metabolism. Arch Environ Health. Mar-Apr 1986;41(2):69-76. [Medline].

  24. Harlan WR. The relationship of blood lead levels to blood pressure in the U.S. population. Environ Health Perspect. Jun 1988;78:9-13. [Medline].

  25. Henderson DA. A follow-up of cases of plumbism in children. Australas Ann Med. Aug 1954;3(3):219-24. [Medline].

  26. Hu H. A 50-year follow-up of childhood plumbism. Hypertension, renal function, and hemoglobin levels among survivors. Am J Dis Child. Jun 1991;145(6):681-7. [Medline].

  27. Hu H, Aro A, Payton M, et al. The relationship of bone and blood lead to hypertension. The Normative Aging Study. JAMA. Apr 17 1996;275(15):1171-6. [Medline].

  28. Inglis JA, Henderson DA, Emmerson BT. The pathology and pathogenesis of chronic lead nephropathy occurring in Queensland. J Pathol. Feb 1978;124(2):65-76. [Medline].

  29. Khalil-Manesh F, Gonick HC, Cohen AH, et al. Experimental model of lead nephropathy. I. Continuous high-dose lead administration. Kidney Int. May 1992;41(5):1192-203. [Medline].

  30. Kim R, Rotnitsky A, Sparrow D, et al. A longitudinal study of low-level lead exposure and impairment of renal function. The Normative Aging Study. JAMA. Apr 17 1996;275(15):1177-81. [Medline].

  31. Kumar BD, Krishnaswamy K. Detection of occupational lead nephropathy using early renal markers. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1995;33(4):331-5. [Medline].

  32. Landrigan PJ, Todd AC. Lead poisoning. West J Med. Aug 1994;161(2):153-9. [Medline].

  33. Lane WG, Kemper AR. American College of Preventive Medicine Practice Policy Statement. Screening for elevated blood lead levels in children. Am J Prev Med. Jan 2001;20(1):78-82. [Medline].

  34. Lin JL, Ho HH, Yu CC. Chelation therapy for patients with elevated body lead burden and progressive renal insufficiency. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. Jan 5 1999;130(1):7-13. [Medline].

  35. Lin JL, Lin-Tan DT, Hsu KH, Yu CC. Environmental lead exposure and progression of chronic renal diseases in patients without diabetes. N Engl J Med. Jan 23 2003;348(4):277-86. [Medline].

  36. Lin JL, Tan DT, Hsu KH, Yu CC. Environmental lead exposure and progressive renal insufficiency. Arch Intern Med. Jan 22 2001;161(2):264-71. [Medline].

  37. Loghman-Adham M. Renal effects of environmental and occupational lead exposure. Environ Health Perspect. Sep 1997;105(9):928-39. [Medline].

  38. Madden EF, Fowler BA. Mechanisms of nephrotoxicity from metal combinations: a review. Drug Chem Toxicol. Feb 2000;23(1):1-12. [Medline].

  39. Mahaffey KR, Annest JL, Roberts J, Murphy RS. National estimates of blood lead levels: United States, 1976-1980: association with selected demographic and socioeconomic factors. N Engl J Med. Sep 2 1982;307(10):573-9. [Medline].

  40. Markowitz M. Lead poisoning. Pediatr Rev. Oct 2000;21(10):327-35. [Medline].

  41. Moel DI, Sachs HK. Renal function 17 to 23 years after chelation therapy for childhood plumbism. Kidney Int. Nov 1992;42(5):1226-31. [Medline].

  42. Nye LJJ. An investigation of the extraordinary incidence of chronic nephritis in young people in Queensland. Med J Aust. 1929;2:145-59.

  43. Olivier AO. De l'albuminurie saturnine. Arch Gen Med. 1863;2:530.

  44. Omae K, Sakurai H, Higashi T, et al. No adverse effects of lead on renal function in lead-exposed workers. Ind Health. 1990;28(2):77-83. [Medline].

  45. Payton M, Hu H, Sparrow D, Weiss ST. Low-level lead exposure and renal function in the Normative Aging Study. Am J Epidemiol. Nov 1 1994;140(9):821-9. [Medline].

  46. Perazella MA. Lead and the kidney: nephropathy, hypertension, and gout. Conn Med. Sep 1996;60(9):521-6. [Medline].

  47. Philip AT, Gerson B. Lead poisoning--Part I. Incidence, etiology, and toxicokinetics. Clin Lab Med. Jun 1994;14(2):423-44. [Medline].

  48. Philip AT, Gerson B. Lead poisoning--Part II. Effects and assay. Clin Lab Med. Sep 1994;14(3):651-70. [Medline].

  49. Pinto de Almeida AR, Carvalho FM, Spinola AG, Rocha H. Renal dysfunction in Brazilian lead workers. Am J Nephrol. 1987;7(6):455-8. [Medline].

  50. Pirkle JL, Schwartz J, Landis JR, Harlan WR. The relationship between blood lead levels and blood pressure and its cardiovascular risk implications. Am J Epidemiol. Feb 1985;121(2):246-58. [Medline].

  51. Pocock SJ, Shaper AG, Ashby D, et al. The relationship between blood lead, blood pressure, stroke, and heart attacks in middle-aged British men. Environ Health Perspect. Jun 1988;78:23-30. [Medline].

  52. Ritz E, Wiecek A, Stoeppler M. Lead Nephropathy. Contrib Nephrol. 1987;55:185-91. [Medline].

  53. Schwartz J. Lead, blood pressure, and cardiovascular disease in men. Arch Environ Health. Jan-Feb 1995;50(1):31-7. [Medline].

  54. Sokas RK, Besarab A, McDiarmid MA, et al. Sensitivity of in vivo X-ray fluorescence determination of skeletal lead stores. Arch Environ Health. Sep-Oct 1990;45(5):268-72. [Medline].

  55. Staessen J, Yeoman WB, Fletcher AE, et al. Blood lead concentration, renal function, and blood pressure in London civil servants. Br J Ind Med. Jul 1990;47(7):442-7. [Medline].

  56. Staudinger KC, Roth VS. Occupational lead poisoning. Am Fam Physician. Feb 15 1998;57(4):719-26, 731-2. [Medline].

  57. Tepper LB. Renal function subsequent to childhood plumbism. Arch Environ Health. Jul 1963;158:76-85. [Medline].

  58. Van de Vyver FL, D''Haese PC, Visser WJ, et al. Bone lead in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. Feb 1988;33(2):601-7. [Medline].

  59. Verschoor M, Wibowo A, Herber R, et al. Influence of occupational low-level lead exposure on renal parameters. Am J Ind Med. 1987;12(4):341-51. [Medline].

  60. Wedeen RP. Bone lead, hypertension, and lead nephropathy. Environ Health Perspect. Jun 1988;78:57-60. [Medline].

  61. Wedeen RP. Lead and hypertension: who cares?. Int J Occup Environ Health. Oct-Dec 2000;6(4):348-50. [Medline].

  62. Wedeen RP, D''Haese P, Van de Vyver FL, et al. Lead nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. Nov 1986;8(5):380-3. [Medline].

  63. Wedeen RP, Malik DK, Batuman V. Detection and treatment of occupational lead nephropathy. Arch Intern Med. Jan 1979;139(1):53-7. [Medline].

  64. Wedeen RP, Van de Vyver FL, D''Haese PC, et al. Bone lead and the diagnosis of lead nephropathy. Contrib Nephrol. 1988;64:102-8. [Medline].

  65. Weeden RP. Poison in the Pot: The Legacy of Lead. Carbondale, Ill: Illinois University Press; 1984.

  66. Yu TF. Lead nephropathy and gout. Am J Kidney Dis. Mar 1983;2(5):555-8. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

saturnine nephropathy, lead toxicity, lead poisoning, industrial lead exposure, lead exposure, lead paint, lead intoxication, nephrotoxicity, lead-induced nephropathy, acute lead poisoning, chronic lead nephropathy, interstitial nephritis, lead hypertension, lead encephalopathy, kidney transplant, renal replacement, chronic renal failure, CRF, end-stage renal disease, ESRD, end stage renal disease, pica, saturnine gout, hyperuricemia, hypertension, illegal corn whiskey, moonshine, huffing, gun shot wound, GSW, kohl, surma, Fanconi syndrome, Fanconi's syndrome

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Pranay Kathuria, MD, MBBS, FACP, FASN, Chief, Section of Nephrology, Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine at Tulsa
Pranay Kathuria, MD, MBBS, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and National Kidney Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Paresh Jadav, MD, Fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Washington School of Medicine
Paresh Jadav, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, and American Medical Student Association/Foundation
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

James W Lohr, MD, Fellowship Program Director, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, State University of New York at Buffalo
James W Lohr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Heart Association, American Society of Nephrology, and Central Society for Clinical Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Managing Editor

Eleanor Lederer, MD, Consulting Staff, Louisville VA Hospital; Professor of Medicine, Director of Nephrology Training Program, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Director, Metabolic Stone Clinic
Eleanor Lederer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Transplantation, International Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, National Kidney Foundation, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine
Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Osteopathic Internists, American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, International Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, Renal Physicians Association, and West Virginia State Medical Association
Disclosure: Abbott Grant/research funds Speaking and teaching; Genzyme Honoraria Consulting; Roche Honoraria Consulting

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN, Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System
Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.