Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis 

  • Author: T K S Rao, MD, FACP; Chief Editor: Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN   more...
 
Updated: Oct 20, 2011
 

Background

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) was first described in 1957. The condition causes asymptomatic proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome (NS) with or without renal insufficiency. A diagnosis of FSGS is confirmed only by histopathology findings, but it can be suggested clinically.[1] FSGS arises through idiopathic or secondary causes.

Next

Pathophysiology

Etiologic agents or mechanisms that initiate glomerular injury and lead to glomerulosclerosis are largely unknown, except in certain animal models of viral-induced renal disease. The primary pathophysiologic process in FSGS is an injury inherent within or directed to podocytes; foot process effacement; proliferation of mesangial, endothelial, and epithelial cells in the early stages, followed by shrinkage/collapse of glomerular capillaries; and ultimately, scarring (glomerulosclerosis).[2, 3]

Proposed mechanisms include viral- or toxin-mediated damage or intrarenal hemodynamic changes such as hyperperfusion and high intraglomerular capillary pressure. FSGS initially begins in the deeper juxtamedullary glomeruli and subsequently extends to the superficial nephrons. The characteristic lesion is a segmental solidification of the glomerular tuft, usually in the perihilar region and sometimes in the peripheral areas, including the tubular pole. The extent of lesions varies in different portions of the kidney, ranging from normal unaffected glomerulus to segmental sclerosis and, eventually, global glomerulosclerosis as the disease evolves. Diffuse foot process fusion occurs, predominantly in the sclerotic segments, although partial effacement may be observed in normal-appearing lobules.

Many morphologic subsets, such as a cellular variant (endocapillary and extracapillary hypercellularity), a collapsing variant (FSGS with mesangial hypercellularity), and FSGS with tip lesions, have been described.[1, 3] Whether these diverse lesions reflect different pathogenesis or account for the differences in the prognoses in patients with FSGS is unclear. To better comprehend some aspects of pathogenesis, FSGS can be classified as follows:

  • Primary (idiopathic) FSGS
    • FSGS with hyalinosis
    • Progression from minimal-change disease
    • Progression from immunoglobulin M (IgM) nephropathy
    • Progression from mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis
    • Superimposed on other primary glomerulonephritis conditions (eg, membranous glomerulonephritis, immunoglobulin A [IgA] nephropathy)
    • Variants of primary FSGS
      • Collapsing form
      • Cellular variant (endocapillary and extracapillary hypercellularity)
      • FSGS with mesangial hypercellularity
      • FSGS with glomerular tip lesions
  • Secondary FSGS
    • Drugs[4]
    • Viruses
    • Hemodynamic factors - With reduced renal mass
      • Solitary kidney
      • Renal allograft
      • Renal dysplasia
      • Renal agenesis
      • Oligomeganephronia
      • Segmental hypoplasia
      • Vesicoureteric reflux
    • Hemodynamic causes - Without reduced renal mass
      • Massive obesity[14]
      • Sickle cell nephropathy
      • Congenital cyanotic heart disease
    • Malignancies
      • Lymphomas
      • Other malignancies
    • Scarring - Postinflammatory in postinfectious glomerulonephritis
    • Miscellaneous
      • Hypertensive nephrosclerosis
      • Alport syndrome
      • Sarcoidosis
      • Radiation nephritis

In other words, factors as diverse as infections, inflammations, toxins, and intrarenal hemodynamic alterations can initiate injury and lead to glomerulosclerosis.

The discovery that mutations in several proteins that play critical roles in podocyte structure, function, or both not only cause FSGS but can predict disease phenotype such as steroid responsiveness has advanced the understanding of the pathophysiology of FSGS.[15, 16, 17] For example, people with causal mutations in TRPC6 or NPHS2 do not respond well to immunosuppressive therapy; however, when they receive kidney transplants, the disease does not usually recur.

Consistent with these findings, Mele et al found that mutations in MYO1E, which encodes a nonmuscle class I myosin, are correlated with childhood-onset, glucocorticoid-resistant FSGS.[18] The finding in some cases that FSGS can occur de novo in transplants and may occur immediately after transplantation, has led to speculation that circulating factors in plasma may engender podocytopathy. The nature of these circulating factors linked to the development of FSGS is being constantly clarified as findings continue to come to light.

Wei et al have shown that elevated levels of soluble form of urokinase receptor (suPAR) was present in the plasma of two-thirds of patients with FSGS.[19] Furthermore, high levels of suPAR were predictive of FSGS recurrence, and lowering suPAR levels by plasmapheresis led to disease remission. In some cases of idiopathic FSGS, other yet-to-be identified circulating factors may be involved. Not all patients with FSGS have elevated suPAR levels, a fact consistent with the suggestion that FSGS is not a disease but a pattern of renal injury that may follow many forms of primary podocyte insults.

The search for other permeability factors is the focus of ongoing research efforts. Genetic variation in the circulating apolipoprotein Apol1 predisposes to FSGS in African Americans, although the putative mechanisms are unknown.[20]

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

United States

Typically, idiopathic FSGS is observed in persons aged 18-45 years, although no age group is exempt from the disease. In children with NS, FSGS is found in 7-10% of renal biopsies; incidence is much greater in those who are resistant to steroid and cyclophosphamide therapy.[21] In adults, the lesion is more common in men and is observed in 20-30% of patients with NS. Incidence of FSGS is 3-7 times higher in young black men as compared with whites.[22]

The annual incidence of secondary FSGS in patients who are addicted to intravenous heroin is 30 times higher (611 cases per million population). In selected urban centers in the United States, heroin-associated FSGS accounted for 11.4% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in the 1970s and 1980s, although the disease gradually disappeared in the 1990s. Most patients with HIV-associated FSGS are young black men (mean age, 33 y; male-to-female ratio, 10:1),[5, 6, 22] 50% are intravenous drug abusers, and the remaining are either gay or bisexual men, heterosexual contacts of infected persons, or children with HIV infection. HIV-associated FSGS is distinctly rare in whites. In the United States and elsewhere, more than 95% of patients are black.[22]

The annual incidence of ESRD attributed to idiopathic FSGS increased 11 fold (from 0.2% to 2.3%) between 1980 and 2000. In black and white patients in the United States, idiopathic FSGS is now the commonest cause of ESRD resulting from primary glomerular disease.

International

FSGS lesions are observed in about 10% of renal biopsies performed for the evaluation of proteinuria.

Mortality/Morbidity

The natural history of FSGS varies a great deal. A typical course runs from edema that is difficult to manage to proteinuria refractory to corticosteroids[21] and other immunosuppressive agents to worsening hypertension and progressive loss of renal function. In patients who do not respond to therapy, the average time from the onset of gross proteinuria to ESRD is 6-8 years, although wide variations in the time course occur. One of the key factors that determines renal survival is the persistence and degree of proteinuria. Achievement of a remission, whether spontaneous or induced by immunosuppressive therapy, is associated with a good renal outcome.[23]

In patients with unresponsive massive proteinuria of greater than 10 g/d, most will develop ESRD within 5 years. The prognosis is much worse in blacks compared to whites. In the collapsing form of FSGS, the disease is marked by severe hypertension, more massive proteinuria, a very poor response to corticosteroids, and a much faster rate of progression to ESRD.

Race

The prevalence rate is much higher in blacks than in whites.[22] In one large epidemiologic study, the annual incidence of FSGS in patients aged 18-45 years was 20 cases per million population in blacks, a rate 7 times higher than that of individuals who are not black. On the other hand, the annual incidence of secondary FSGS in patients addicted to intravenous heroin is 30 times higher (611 cases per million population). As previously noted, most subjects with HIV-associated FSGS are young black men.

Sex

In adults, the lesion is 3-4 times more common in men than women.

Age

Typically, idiopathic FSGS is observed in persons aged 18-45 years, although no age group is exempt from the disease. In children with NS, FSGS is found in 7-10% of renal biopsy specimens; incidence is much greater in those who are resistant to steroid and cyclophosphamide therapy.[21]

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

T K S Rao, MD, FACP  Professor, Department of Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center

T K S Rao, MD, FACP is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Anjana S Soman, MD  Staff Physician, Department of Pathology, Quest Diagnostics

Anjana S Soman, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Clinical Pathology and College of American Pathologists

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Chike Magnus Nzerue, MD  Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Vice-Chairman of Internal Medicine, Meharry Medical College

Chike Magnus Nzerue, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Society of Nephrology, and National Kidney Foundation

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Eleanor Lederer, MD  Professor of Medicine, Chief, Nephrology Division, Director, Nephrology Training Program, Director, Metabolic Stone Clinic, Kidney Disease Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Louisville Veterans Affairs Hospital

Eleanor Lederer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Federation for Medical Research, American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, American Society of Nephrology, American Society of Transplantation, International Society of Nephrology, Kentucky Medical Association, National Kidney Foundation, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Dept of Veterans Affairs Grant/research funds Research

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section Chief, Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University School of Medicine

Rebecca J Schmidt, DO, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Medical Association, American Society of Nephrology, International Society of Nephrology, National Kidney Foundation, Renal Physicians Association, and West Virginia State Medical Association

Disclosure: Renal Ventures Ownership interest Other

Chief Editor

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN  Professor of Medicine, Section of Nephrology-Hypertension, Tulane University School of Medicine; Chief, Medicine Service, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System

Vecihi Batuman, MD, FACP, FASN is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, and International Society of Nephrology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Thomas DB. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a morphologic diagnosis in evolution. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Feb 2009;133(2):217-23. [Medline].

  2. D'Agati VD. The spectrum of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. May 2008;17(3):271-81. [Medline].

  3. Barisoni L, Schnaper HW, Kopp JB. Advances in the biology and genetics of the podocytopathies: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Feb 2009;133(2):201-16. [Medline].

  4. Rao TKS, Nicastri AD, Friedman EA. The nephropathies of drug addiction and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In: Renal Pathology. New York, NY: JB Lippincott; 1989:340-56.

  5. Cunningham EE, Brentjens JR, Zielezny MA, et al. Heroin nephropathy. A clinicopathologic and epidemiologic study. Am J Med. Jan 1980;68(1):47-53. [Medline].

  6. Cunningham EE, Zielezny MA, Venuto RC. Heroin-associated nephropathy. A nationwide problem. JAMA. Dec 2 1983;250(21):2935-6. [Medline].

  7. Friedman EA, Tao TK. Disappearance of uremia due to heroin-associated nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. May 1995;25(5):689-93. [Medline].

  8. Rao TKS, Nicastri AD, Friedman EA. Natural history of heroin-associated nephropathy. N Engl J Med. Jan 3 1974;290(1):19-23. [Medline].

  9. Bruggeman LA, Dikman S, Meng C, et al. Nephropathy in human immunodeficiency virus-1 transgenic mice is due to renal transgene expression. J Clin Invest. Jul 1 1997;100(1):84-92. [Medline].

  10. D'Agati V, Appel GB. HIV infection and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. Jan 1997;8(1):138-52. [Medline].

  11. Kimmel PL, Bosch JP, Vassalotti JA. Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. Jul 1998;18(4):446-58. [Medline].

  12. Rao TKS. Renal complications in HIV disease. Med Clin North Am. Nov 1996;80(6):1437-51. [Medline].

  13. Winston JA, Burns GC, Klotman PE. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic and HIV-associated nephropathy. Semin Nephrol. Jul 1998;18(4):373-7. [Medline].

  14. Verani RR. Obesity-associated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: pathological features of the lesion and relationship with cardiomegaly and hyperlipidemia. Am J Kidney Dis. Dec 1992;20(6):629-34. [Medline].

  15. Tryggvason K, Patrakka J, Wartiovaara J. Hereditary proteinuria syndromes and mechanisms of proteinuria. N Engl J Med. Mar 30 2006;354(13):1387-401. [Medline].

  16. Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL, et al. A mutation in the TRPC6 cation channel causes familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science. Jun 17 2005;308(5729):1801-4. [Medline].

  17. Shankland SJ, Pollak MR. A suPAR circulating factor causes kidney disease. Nat Med. Aug 4 2011;17(8):926-7. [Medline].

  18. Mele C, Iatropoulos P, Donadelli R, et al. MYO1E mutations and childhood familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med. Jul 28 2011;365(4):295-306. [Medline].

  19. Wei C, El Hindi S, Li J, Fornoni A, et al. Circulating urokinase receptor as a cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Med. Jul 31 2011;17(8):952-60. [Medline].

  20. Genovese G, Friedman DJ, Ross MD, et al. Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science. Aug 13 2010;329(5993):841-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  21. Del Rio M, Kaskel F. Evaluation and management of steroid-unresponsive nephrotic syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr. Apr 2008;20(2):151-6. [Medline].

  22. Freedman BI, Hicks PJ, Bostrom MA, et al. Polymorphisms in the non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) are strongly associated with end-stage renal disease historically attributed to hypertension in African Americans. Kidney Int. Jan 28 2009;[Medline].

  23. Deegens JK, Wetzels JF. Immunosuppressive treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: lessons from a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int. Oct 2011;80(8):798-801. [Medline].

  24. Gipson DS, Trachtman H, Kaskel FJ, et al. Clinical trial of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children and young adults. Kidney Int. Oct 2011;80(8):868-78. [Medline].

  25. Cattran DC, Appel GB, Hebert LA, et al. A randomized trial of cyclosporine in patients with steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. North America Nephrotic Syndrome Study Group. Kidney Int. Dec 1999;56(6):2220-6. [Medline].

  26. Choi MJ, Eustace JA, Gimenez LF, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil treatment for primary glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. Mar 2002;61(3):1098-114. [Medline].

  27. Chun MJ, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, et al. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic adults: presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy of the histologic variants. J Am Soc Nephrol. Aug 2004;15(8):2169-77. [Medline].

  28. Cotran RS. Nephrology Forum. Glomerulosclerosis in reflux nephropathy. Kidney Int. Mar 1982;21(3):528-34. [Medline].

  29. Crook ED, Habeeb D, Gowdy O, et al. Effects of steroids in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a predominantly African-American population. Am J Med Sci. Jul 2005;330(1):19-24. [Medline].

  30. D'Agati V. The many masks of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. Oct 1994;46(4):1223-41. [Medline].

  31. D'Agati V, Appel GB. Renal pathology of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Semin Nephrol. Jul 1998;18(4):406-21. [Medline].

  32. de Jong PE, Statius van Eps LW. Sickle cell nephropathy: new insights into its pathophysiology. Kidney Int. May 1985;27(5):711-7. [Medline].

  33. Falk RJ, Scheinman J, Phillips G, et al. Prevalence and pathologic features of sickle cell nephropathy and response to inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme. N Engl J Med. Apr 2 1992;326(14):910-5. [Medline].

  34. Glassock RJ, Cohen AH, Adler SG. Primary glomerular diseases. In: Brenner BM, ed. The Kidney. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:1446-52.

  35. Kitiyakara C, Eggers P, Kopp JB. Twenty-one-year trend in ESRD due to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. Nov 2004;44(5):815-25. [Medline].

  36. Korbet SM. Angiotensin antagonists and steroids in the treatment of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Semin Nephrol. Mar 2003;23(2):219-28. [Medline].

  37. Korbet SM. Treatment of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. Dec 2002;62(6):2301-10. [Medline].

  38. Meyer TW, Baboolal K, Brenner BM. Nephron adaptation to renal injury. In: Brenner BM, ed. The Kidney. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1996:2031-37.

  39. Moudgil A, Bagga A, Nast CC. Detection of parvovirus B19 in renal biopsies of patients with idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy. J Amer Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:94A.

  40. Stirling CM, Mathieson P, Boulton-Jones JM, et al. Treatment and outcome of adult patients with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in five UK renal units. QJM. Jun 2005;98(6):443-9. [Medline].

  41. Troyanov S, Wall CA, Miller JA, et al. Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis: definition and relevance of a partial remission. J Am Soc Nephrol. Apr 2005;16(4):1061-8. [Medline].

  42. Valeri A, Barisoni L, Appel GB, et al. Idiopathic collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a clinicopathologic study. Kidney Int. Nov 1996;50(5):1734-46. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.