Lumbar Disc Disease Workup
- Author: Kamran Sahrakar, MD, FACS; Chief Editor: Allen R Wyler, MD more...
Imaging Studies
- MRI is by far the most commonly ordered test to evaluate patients with sciatica.
- Often, MRI is performed prior to plain radiographs.
- MRI is very sensitive in delineating lumbar disc herniations. Far lateral discs are best evaluated with this test.
- In reoperations, MRI can delineate the full extent of scar tissue and, with moderate reliability, differentiate it from recurrent disc herniation.
- CT scan myelography may be preferred by surgeons for evaluating patients before reoperation or for evaluating patients who have severely spondylotic changes. This is because CT scan myelography can delineate bony structures better than MRI.
- Plain radiographs, especially with weight-bearing flexion and extension views, can be a useful adjunct to other radiographic evaluations. Some spine tumors, instabilities, malalignments, and congenital anomalies can be identified best with plain radiographs. Obtain plain films on all patients prior to surgery.
Other Tests
Electromyography is rarely helpful in the diagnosis or management of lumbar disc disease. Occasionally, a diabetic patient can be identified as having a polyradiculopathy or plexopathy. On this basis, some surgeons proceed to surgery with more caution.
Histologic Findings
Some surgeons continue to submit disc material for histologic diagnosis. The yield of this is exceedingly low and of questionable benefit.
Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Takahara K, et al. Optimal duration of conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation depending on the type of herniation. J Clin Neurosci. Feb 2007;14(2):104-9. [Medline].
Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B, et al. Effect of caudal epidural steroid or saline injection in chronic lumbar radiculopathy: multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. Sep 13 2011;343:d5278. [Medline].
Mirzai H, Tekin I, Yaman O, et al. The results of nucleoplasty in patients with lumbar herniated disc: a prospective clinical study of 52 consecutive patients. Spine J. Jan-Feb 2007;7(1):88-92; discussion 92-3. [Medline].
Celik SE, Celik S, Kara A, et al. Lumbar facet joint angle and its importance on joint violation in lumbar microdiscectomy. Neurosurgery. Jan 2008;62(1):168-72; discussion 172-3. [Medline].
Eugene J. Carragee, MD, Anthony O. et al. A Prospective Controlled Study of Limited VersusSubtotal Posterior Discectomy: Short-Term Outcomesin Patients With Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Discsand Large Posterior Anular Defect. Spine. 2006;31:653-657.
Rihn JA, Hilibrand AS, Radcliff K, et al. Duration of Symptoms Resulting from Lumbar Disc Herniation: Effect on Treatment Outcomes: Analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 19 2011;93(20):1906-14. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. Nov 22 2006;296(20):2441-50. [Medline].
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. Nov 22 2006;296(20):2451-9. [Medline].
Mazanec D, Okereke L. Interpreting the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Medical vs surgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation: implications for future trials. Cleve Clin J Med. Aug 2007;74(8):577-83. [Medline].
Sørensen IG, Jacobsen P, Gyntelberg F, Suadicani P. Occupational and Other Predictors of Herniated Lumbar Disc Disease-A 33-Year Follow-up in The Copenhagen Male Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Sep 1 2011;36(19):1541-6. [Medline].
Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, et al. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine. Apr 20 2008;33(9):973-8. [Medline].
Arts M, Brand R, van der Kallen B, Lycklama à Nijeholt G, Peul W. Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J. Jan 2011;20(1):51-7. [Medline].
Bussieres AE, Taylor JA, Peterson C. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. Jan 2008;31(1):33-88. [Medline].
Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: assessment of functional outcome. J Neurosurg Spine. Jun 2005;2(6):639-46. [Medline].
Ehni BL, Benzel EC. Lumbar Discectomy. Spine Surgery. 1999;1:389-400.
Hardy RW. Extradural Cauda Equina and Nerve Root Compression from Benign Lesions of the Lumbar Spine. Neurological Surgery. 1996;3:2357-2374.
Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, et al. Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine. Nov 15 1999;24(22):2313-7. [Medline].
Williams RW. Lumbar disc disease. Microdiscectomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. Jan 1993;4(1):101-8. [Medline].
Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Breme K, et al. Variability of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Spine. Apr 15 1999;24(8):807-11. [Medline].

